[Bug 696546] Re: Crypic error comment
Interesting that a bug from 2010 should still be around. I haven't had this problem lately, but if it still shows up in testing, it should be fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696546 Title: Crypic error comment To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/696546/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936257] Re: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry
Just installed trusty (14.04) and this upstream problem is still present. Someone should send a message upstream that the system is for the end user. This has been present for several releases and as a programmer myself, I know this is a simple fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936257 Title: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/936257/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1270966] [NEW] Brasero fails to start from dash menu
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu 13.10 Release:13.10 brasero: Installed: 3.8.0-1ubuntu3 Candidate: 3.8.0-1ubuntu3 Version table: *** 3.8.0-1ubuntu3 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ saucy/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status When invoked from the Dash, brasero fails to put up its gui, then terminates. When invoked by double clicking on an ISO file, it cannot find the optical drive. Very annoying, as I really want to make a hard copy of the 13.10 ISO for my archive. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: brasero 3.8.0-1ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-15.23-generic 3.11.10 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-15-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Jan 20 17:11:30 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-22 (454 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: brasero UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-18 (94 days ago) ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug saucy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1270966 Title: Brasero fails to start from dash menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/1270966/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1236089] [NEW] Nautilus does not sense the presence of wine
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu Saucy Salamander (development branch) Release:13.10 nautilus: Installed: 1:3.8.2-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 1:3.8.2-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1:3.8.2-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ saucy/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Installed today: Description:Ubuntu Saucy Salamander (development branch) Release:13.10 wine: Installed: 1.6-0ubuntu1~ppa3 Candidate: 1.6-0ubuntu1~ppa3 Version table: *** 1.6-0ubuntu1~ppa3 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-wine/ppa/ubuntu/ saucy/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.4.1-0ubuntu7 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ saucy/universe amd64 Packages The right click facility to open a windows exe does not present the wine windows program loader as an option. I prepared a screen shot for this but was unable to crop it using the GIMP because nautilus doesn't recognize that it is also present (installed yesterday). Description:Ubuntu Saucy Salamander (development branch) Release:13.10 gimp: Installed: 2.8.6-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.8.6-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.8.6-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ saucy/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Yes, I did a boot. No joy. I realise this is beta software, but wouldn't it be sensible to get the file system interface up almost before anything else? Installed packages such as this must appear in the application choice listing after they've been installed. This may turn out to be a problem with the installer (apt), but the symptoms are that nautilus is sick. Hoping for an early fix, the frozen north signs out. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: nautilus 1:3.8.2-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-11.17-generic 3.11.3 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Oct 6 17:27:24 2013 GsettingsChanges: b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'geometry' b'840x550+907+24' InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-10-05 (1 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 Saucy Salamander - Beta amd64 (20130925.1) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug saucy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1236089 Title: Nautilus does not sense the presence of wine To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1236089/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1236089] Re: Nautilus does not sense the presence of wine
Forgot to mention that the work around is to run the wine command from the correct directory in the console. Works just fine thank you, but the shortcut would be nice. One gets into operating habits, and find the facilities missing is rather more than slightly annoying. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1236089 Title: Nautilus does not sense the presence of wine To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1236089/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1075354] Re: Assertion failure in gedit but program continues.
Still present in 13.04. (gedit:3667): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_list_store_set_column_types: assertion `priv-columns_dirty == 0' failed Description:Ubuntu 13.04 Release:13.04 gedit: Installed: 3.6.2-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 3.6.2-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 3.6.2-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Only shows up when starting gedit from a console, but probably otherwise hits the bit bucket. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075354 Title: Assertion failure in gedit but program continues. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1075354/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 951439] Re: [soundnua]: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV
no recurrence, so closing is appropriate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951439 Title: [soundnua]: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/951439/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936257] Re: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry
I look forward to testing 13.04. Hard to believe that a few windows properties settings can be such a pain, but I do understand that the man-power shortage can cause problems. I think a lot of it can be solved by doing a more assiduous QA inside the heads of the programmers. They seem to be an uncaring lot. Wastn't true of them when I was running a programming shop. The rule should be Think what you are doing to users other than yourselves. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936257 Title: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/936257/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1075354] [NEW] Assertion failure in gedit but program continues.
Public bug reported: $ gedit stat.txt (gedit:6108): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_list_store_set_column_types: assertion `priv-columns_dirty == 0' failed Description:Ubuntu 12.10 Release:12.10 gedit: Installed: 3.6.0-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 3.6.0-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 3.6.0-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status This appears to be harmless but the developers should be made aware of it. Compressed version of the file attached. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: gedit 3.6.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-17.28-generic 3.5.5 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-17-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov 5 18:11:56 2012 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-22 (13 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: gedit UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity ** Attachment added: The text file that provoked the above assertion failure. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075354/+attachment/3425135/+files/stat.txt.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075354 Title: Assertion failure in gedit but program continues. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1075354/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936257] Re: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry
One tends to wonder if invalid is simply a way of getting rid of this problem without a statement that it has been addressed. I am currently running the 12.10 Beta2 in test mode, and will have to examine this to see if it is fixed or ameliorated in any way. It most certainly wasn't in 12.04 LTS. The windows do NOT resise if you change the font size. Either put the controls back to default (all on) or fix the programs. Something I've also noticed, is that some programs get overhauled on the basis of a new release when it probably is not necessary. If it is not broken, don't fix it. More care needs to be taken with the desktops to maintain compatibility with apps, especially apps written by the client base. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to get management to agree to migrate to a new version when all the in-house apps not only have to be tested, but in all likelihood entered into a repair cycle for which there is no allowance in a very busy development shop? Lack of resources on your part must not cause a problem on my part. A little more care and QA is needed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936257 Title: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/936257/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936257] Re: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry
Thanks for taking a second look at this, Dylan. This carelessness with respect to the controls is like telling your corporate receptionist that she is irrelevant to the business and is just a pretty face. The settings panel and all the sub-pages are the opening shot when a new users or one who is upgrading gets his first impression of the software. I've been a programmer for over 50 years and I think this kind of thing is unforgivable. I wouldn't do it, and there is no reason somebody who wasn't even a twinkle in his grandpa's eye when I started out should do it. I am pretty sure Ada Lovelace wouldn't do it either. If slight changes in the user interface in the system invalidates everything, it is time to talk about stability in the product. New version of the desktops [sic] is not an excuse to revisit the source code of every component under the sun (and under the moon too). If you can't get better programmers, I may have to come out of retirement. John C. Winterton, CCP, Professor - Computer Science (retired). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936257 Title: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/936257/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 951859] Re: [soundnua]: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 951439 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951439 I don't seem to be allowed to see that page, so I am unable to comment. I did fix my sound problem (wrong driver selected). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951859 Title: [soundnua]: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/951859/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936257] Re: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry
Dylan, jgv: I suggest, Dylan, you just try it and see what the effects are. They are rather retarted, IMHO. As a matter of interest, yesterday I pulled in all the necessary software and tried the very first item in the Getting Started section of GTK+ 3 reference manual. It runs without a hitch, producing the default widget form which is both resizable, and in general what a window should be. Frankly, I don't understand why developers go out of their way to turn some of these controls off. I've discovered another frog in alarmclock, an app that I rather depend on to keep me going through the day. In this version, while adding a new alarm, the text box for adding dialog to the static popup doesn't appear to be enabled. I am going to report this as a separate bug after I have nailed it down a little better. I suggest that whoever is writing these specifications needs to shake his head. There is a distinct trend in this version of Ubuntu (11.10) to over-restrict some apps that were not previously so poor. This is definitely a retreat from quality. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936257 Title: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/936257/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 936257] Re: Gnome-Control-Center window poorly programmed
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936257 Title: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/936257/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936257] Re: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry
Considering that this kind of thing is a simply poor decision on the part of a programmer/developer, I believe it should be fixed for 12.04 LTS. Most GUI systems I have used default to full control of the widget window. I believe that this and similar sins of omission such as the same problem with alacarte should be assigned to someone as an urgent ongoing problem. This affects everyone who, like me, has difficulty with the tiny default font sizes. It is a fairly simple thing for me to increase my font size, but not very helpful if the widgets are insensitive to this issue. On the internationalization front, this kind of thing must be very bad for users whose languges are more verbose than English. Please pass this to the upstream developers. I think this is just a matter of carelessness, and they need to become more aware of the user community. The idea of casting pearls before swine is becoming endemic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936257 Title: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/936257/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936257] Re: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry
Thanks, Seb. I do understand the point about software cycles. I sometimes think that fixed software cycles are rules made to be broken. I also understand the dearth of good developers. I am sorry to say that I've been retired from programming now for nearly 25 years. I haven't written any real code since then so I am thoroughly out of date. I do, however, insist that the stuff I get should have at least been passed though a more thorough quality assurance than I've been seeing on 11.10. As an aside, I've given up on the Unity desktop. It is a matter of personal preference, but I am now running xfce. I am not much oriented to unexplained mysterious icons that jump into my face. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936257 Title: the system settings grid shouldn't use a fixed geometry To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/936257/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936257] [NEW] Gnome-Control-Center window poorly programmed
Public bug reported: Because i have visual acuity problems it is necessary for me to use a larger font on my desktop. This program and several others have fixed windows boundaries and cannot be resized. Another example is the Menu Editor (alacarte) which is insensitive of the font size along with this rather inconvenient new item. As a programmer of long experience, I find this sort of thing to be careless and sloppy. Who is doing QA on this stuff before you send it out??? Description:Ubuntu 11.10 Release:11.10 gnome-control-center: Installed: 1:3.2.2-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 1:3.2.2-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1:3.2.2-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:3.2.0-0ubuntu6 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main amd64 Packages What should happen? All utility windows should be both resizable and sensitive to the font in use. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.2.2-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-16.28-generic 3.0.17 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-16-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Feb 19 09:42:45 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2012-02-17 (2 days ago) usr_lib_gnome-control-center: deja-dup 20.1-0ubuntu0.2 gnome-bluetooth3.2.0-0ubuntu2 indicator-datetime 0.3.1-0ubuntu1 ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936257 Title: Gnome-Control-Center window poorly programmed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/936257/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936257] Re: Gnome-Control-Center window poorly programmed
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936257 Title: Gnome-Control-Center window poorly programmed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/936257/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 747772] Re: gdm fails to come up completely.
I have upgraded to the official release of 11.10 and this problem does not appear. I think it can now be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747772 Title: gdm fails to come up completely. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/747772/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 850336] Re: Oneiric beta desktop non-functional.
Fine, glad to help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850336 Title: Oneiric beta desktop non-functional. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/850336/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 850336] Re: Oneiric beta desktop non-functional.
Fixed by subsequent updates. Not surprising, I suppose, but this can now be closed as being transient. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850336 Title: Oneiric beta desktop non-functional. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/850336/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 795558] Re: Cannot change pointer
Agreed. It is always good to have confirmed testing before a feature is offered. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795558 Title: Cannot change pointer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/795558/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 850336] [NEW] Oneiric beta desktop non-functional.
Public bug reported: I applied the published updates to oneiric beta this morning, and now I no longer get any controls except for a menu in nautilus. ALT+F2 is not working, so I can't get get a console command in. Hope you will be able to fix this soon. Since I can't open a console, I am unable to give the usual version information. Unity appears to be broken. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850336 Title: Oneiric beta desktop non-functional. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/850336/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 666380] Re: The case of the missing desktop
I think you can close this. I have switched to 11.04 and have not have a recurrence. There has also been an upgrade to the ATI driver (fglrx) that has fixed some other problems, It appears that there was an initialization problem with gdm coming from some complication with Xorg that has either been fixed or no longer exists because of revisions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666380 Title: The case of the missing desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/666380/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 795558] Re: Cannot change pointer
This should be removed from the list. Fixed in last update. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795558 Title: Cannot change pointer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/795558/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 795558] Re: Cannot change pointer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795558 Title: Cannot change pointer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/795558/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 795558] [NEW] Cannot change pointer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm Description:Ubuntu 11.04 Release:11.04 gdm: Installed: 2.32.1-0ubuntu3.2 Candidate: 2.32.1-0ubuntu3.2 Version table: *** 2.32.1-0ubuntu3.2 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.32.1-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main amd64 Packages With neither compiz, nor metacity am I able to change the pointer from small white (default) on this theme (Ambiance). Since I have visual impairment problems, this is getting to be beyond annoying. I do not choose to use other, high contrast themes because I find them annoying. Instead of trying to me-too smart phones, the alternate desktops should have been better debugged. The default desktop with this release, which arrived unannounced, is totally unacceptable to me. Trash like that should be offered as an option, not as default. You are doing your best to turn yourselves into Microsoft. If this goes on, I will find a different distribution. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gdm 2.32.1-0ubuntu3.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jun 10 09:47:27 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gdm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795558 Title: Cannot change pointer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/795558/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 795558] Re: Cannot change pointer
Subsequent note. I did change the pointer to black. I cannot get the redglass pointer to work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795558 Title: Cannot change pointer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/795558/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 747772] [NEW] gdm fails to come up completely.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm Description:Ubuntu Natty (development branch) Release:11.04 gdm: Installed: 2.32.0-0ubuntu14 Candidate: 2.32.0-0ubuntu14 Version table: *** 2.32.0-0ubuntu14 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status After today's rather large update using recovery boot (update-manager known to be sick), proceeded to regular terminal login and called gdm using 'sudo gdm'. Login was OK. However, some failure, perhaps with restoring panels caused large black areas to appear on the desktop which could not be reversed. Mousing around made them worse. This is being submitted from low-graphics mode. That update was so large it is hard to pin this down, and I hope you are able to say what happened. BTW, since the update is after the Beta release date, can I consider this the beta now or is it still alpha? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gdm 2.32.0-0ubuntu14 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Apr 1 16:40:04 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gdm UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-28 (4 days ago) ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747772 Title: gdm fails to come up completely. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 747772] Re: gdm fails to come up completely.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747772 Title: gdm fails to come up completely. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 696546] Re: Crypic error comment
Most intriguing. I created an account and now it says my password is invalid. I don't understand why there should be such a dichotomy for bug reporting, and since I can't use GNOME Bugzilla until I get some clarification, I will have to rest here. Frankly, I have had contretemps with Bugzilla software in the past, and I am not impressed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696546 Title: Crypic error comment -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 696546] [NEW] Crypic error comment
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: file-roller Description:Ubuntu 10.10 Release:10.10 file-roller: Installed: 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status The package says An error occurred while adding files to archive. This is about as helpful as the old IBM 7000 Series console message 'Operator must do something'. Even running this from console does not produce a log of the errors. If I have missed a report file, I crave enlightenment. If there is a log, the message could at least say where it is. If there is not a log, then the package needs to create one. I need to know whether my archive is any good or not. And if it is bad, what parts of it are untrustworthy. I have run this twice to two different external hard drives with the same result, and I am not amused. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: file-roller 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jan 2 11:35:49 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_CA.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: file-roller ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696546 Title: Crypic error comment -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 696546] Re: Crypic error comment
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696546 Title: Crypic error comment -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 673141] [NEW] Nautilus fails to detect the manual removal of media
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Description:Ubuntu 10.10 Release:10.10 nautilus: Installed: 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I manually changed media from a DVD to a CD without dismounting it first in Nautilus or other application. I was surprised to find that the change of media was ignored by the system. I don't know what happens to the associated interrupts, but they should be serviced. They seem to be ignored. I suspect that Nautilus is being mushroom managed by the kernel and its driver. I don't think it is good software policy to suppress or ignore interrupts having to do with the presence or absence of media. In fact, I think it is totally inappropriate to do so. Operating silliness like this went out with the ATLAS-8. And yes, I am angry. There must be someone who knows this system that can get this right. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: nautilus 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-23.37-generic 2.6.35.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-23-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Nov 9 13:03:40 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_CA.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- Nautilus fails to detect the manual removal of media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 673141] Re: Nautilus fails to detect the manual removal of media
-- Nautilus fails to detect the manual removal of media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 673141] Re: Nautilus fails to detect the manual removal of media
Admittedly, this is a cosmetic fix, but I don't think it should be let go past the next release. -- Nautilus fails to detect the manual removal of media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 666380] [NEW] The case of the missing desktop
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 gdm: Installed: 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu4 Candidate: 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu4 Version table: *** 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu4 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.30.0-0ubuntu5 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages I was working on the Internet, and when I finished, the folders and files from my desktop directory were not on the screen. So, having had this before, I logged off and logged back on. The wall paper was displayed, but neither the desktop content nor the panels appeared. A reboot was required to restore normality. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gdm 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Oct 25 12:25:17 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gdm ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- The case of the missing desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 666380] Re: The case of the missing desktop
-- The case of the missing desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 659927] Re: brasero fails to launch
I am sorry, it was all lost in a system crash yesterday. In light of events, I had to format my disks, and I lost my archives as well, which puts me back to square zero. I was so disgusted with 10.10 that I retreated to 10.04 LTS. Frankly, 10.10 has overtones of Vista. Rushed on to the scene for some purpose other than providing the best software for its users. -- brasero fails to launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659927 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 659927] Re: brasero fails to launch
Program runs correctly from CLI. Clearly, something serious has happened to your implementation of xorg and related items. Not only have several programs failed to perform in the GUI environment, but you have also broken my nvidia-96 driver, disabling my high graphics environment. This release should have been held back, no matter what the marketing people wanted. The disk I just burned was for openSUSE. -- brasero fails to launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659927 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 659927] [NEW] brasero fails to launch
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero Description:Ubuntu 10.10 Release:10.10 brasero: Installed: 2.32.0-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 2.32.0-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 2.32.0-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status At attempt to launch brasero, both from the file system submenus and from the applications menu fail. The application does not start. I expected to be able to burn a new iso boot cd. Nothing happened at all, except the system recognized by blank CD-R This package was working before this release. Why did you 'fix' it? Comment: There are a number of decor changes in this release that undoubtedly took several man-hours of development time, but were truly unneeded. You are starting to look like a branch of Microsoft. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: brasero 2.32.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.34-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Oct 13 09:53:40 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en_US:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: brasero ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- brasero fails to launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659927 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 659927] Re: brasero fails to launch
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659927/+attachment/1691009/+files/Dependencies.txt -- brasero fails to launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659927 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 645472] Re: Alarm Clock panel applet has several disfeatures.
I upgraded to 10.10. The bugs reported here are fixed in that release. This bug should be closed out. -- Alarm Clock panel applet has several disfeatures. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 645472] Re: Alarm Clock panel applet has several disfeatures.
I don't know how to add a picture to this site, so I created a web page on my site. Here is the URL http://www.ezlink.ca/~jwinterton/Alarm%20applet%20bug%20illustrated.html This really is a small error either in specification or programming. I think it falls into the area of public relations. The same applies to the other problem which looks like this: Edit-key-depressed-interrupt: If no-alarm-selected then return 0 else get on with the edit end-if -- Alarm Clock panel applet has several disfeatures. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 645472] [NEW] Alarm Clock panel applet has several disfeatures.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 gdm: Installed: 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu3 Candidate: 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu3 Version table: *** 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.30.0-0ubuntu5 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages I have notices two misfeature's in the Alarm Clock panel applet 1. When a periodic alarm fires, the manager continues to show the countdown of the next occurrence of that alarm. It should move on to the next alarm with the least time left. 2. If you press the edit button, and no alarm is selected, it converts to add. It should simply ignore the button if no alarm is selected or ask the user which one he wants to edit. I would prefer a simple ignore (exit from the button routine). These are easy to work around, but they are slightly annoying. A simple search of the list would solve item 1 and a simple if statement would fix item 2. I am sure that we all want this operating system to be the best around, and it very nearly is. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gdm 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Sep 22 14:43:18 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gdm ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Alarm Clock panel applet has several disfeatures. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 645472] Re: Alarm Clock panel applet has several disfeatures.
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645472/+attachment/1623818/+files/Dependencies.txt -- Alarm Clock panel applet has several disfeatures. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 605637] Re: Brasero will not copy cd to image file because cdrdao is not present. False!
The only cdrkit I could find was cdrkit-doc. I widened my scope of updates to include the proposed objects, and got a big update. Strangely, before the update, but after the chanve, cdrdao showed as uninstalled where it showed as installed before this. If brasero was looking for a specific version, its error message leaves something to be desired. Will try this again and see if this is now cleared up. -- Brasero will not copy cd to image file because cdrdao is not present. False! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 605637] Re: Brasero will not copy cd to image file because cdrdao is not present. False!
Widening the scope of updates was no help. An apparently new cdrdao was loaded, but no soap. The matter is not so urgent that I am going to wade through all the stuff in the cdrkit documentation to try and do this by hand. However, whatever is going on should be solved. I think brasero is looking for cdrdao in the wrong place. On my machine it is in /usr/bin. If brasero is looking anywhere else, it explains why it doesn't find it. -- Brasero will not copy cd to image file because cdrdao is not present. False! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 605637] [NEW] Brasero will not copy cd to image file because cdrdao is not present. False!
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero I have a mounted data CD and I asked Brasero to copy it to an image file. I would have preferred an ISO image, but would have taken anything if it could only do it at all. Brasero went through the formalities then claimed that the module cdrdao was not available. I checked with synaptic and found that the module was present. Just to be sure, I flagged it for re-installation and ran dpkg using synaptic. After the re-install completed, Brasero continued to refuse in the same way. This has not been a useful package for some time, and it should be cleaned up. Maybe there are just too many cooks in this pot. Brasero version: 2.30.2-0ubuntu1\ UBUNTU version 10.04 plus upgrades to date. I was trying to create a short-cut to mounting these disks repeatedly as this may damage them. I have used the disks directly to iinstall the relevant software, but would rather not if I could keep an on-line copy. Brasero's score: F- ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: brasero 2.30.2-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Jul 14 17:47:24 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: brasero ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Brasero will not copy cd to image file because cdrdao is not present. False! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 605637] Re: Brasero will not copy cd to image file because cdrdao is not present. False!
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51945048/Dependencies.txt -- Brasero will not copy cd to image file because cdrdao is not present. False! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 572603] [NEW] Can't log in to suspended session
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm Lucid Lynx (10.4) released today. I suspect this may not be a problem with gdm but the infrastructure governing logins. Here is the scenario: 1. Perform a switch user from my ID 2. Login to root (yes, I need root user access) 3. Some maintenance activity 4. Log out of root expecting to return to my ID via a lock screen 5. Blank screen requiring a power off restart Workaround: Log off instead of switch user. Everything works fine then. Comment: The new version seems to have a lot of vulnerabilities related to signing on. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gdm 2.30.0-0ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Apr 30 16:06:44 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gdm ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Can't log in to suspended session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 572603] Re: Can't log in to suspended session
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/46708003/Dependencies.txt -- Can't log in to suspended session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 477085] Re: Screen is presented blank with no content.
Yes, please do. I should have closed it myself as it was fixed by a published update (I don't know which one). -- Screen is presented blank with no content. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477085 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 477085] Re: Screen is presented blank with no content.
-- Screen is presented blank with no content. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477085 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 488534] [NEW] Blank combo box when wanting to change Font
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gucharmap This doesn't seem to be quite what has been previously reported. Version is Karmic. This package worked quite well up until today when I switched to webdings to pick up an oddball character. When I went to switch fonts for another need, the combo box presented was blank. This was not previously the case. I am getting a lot of blank screens with this release, mostly to do with consoles or popups. If this is a symptom of the same thing, I hope it helps you all to find this clearly generic problem. Maybe it is me, but I think I have a more or less standard set of software. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Nov 25 19:49:01 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gucharmap NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: gucharmap 1:2.28.0-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-15.50-generic SourcePackage: gucharmap Uname: Linux 2.6.31-15-generic i686 ** Affects: gucharmap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Blank combo box when wanting to change Font https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488534 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gucharmap in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 488534] Re: Blank combo box when wanting to change Font
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36085330/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36085331/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36085332/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36085333/XsessionErrors.txt -- Blank combo box when wanting to change Font https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488534 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gucharmap in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 477085] Re: Screen is presented blank with no content. Happens on others as well. Grrrr.
** Attachment added: BugInRootTerminal.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35668309/BugInRootTerminal.png -- Screen is presented blank with no content. Happens on others as well. G. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477085 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
