[Bug 570949] Re: the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video
On that front, even though gnome-screensaver is the default installed package, since xscreensaver is an officially supported package (because it has the Ubuntu logo next to in Synaptic, yes?), should you also test against xscreensaver? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570949 Title: the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 570949] Re: the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video
Erm, I'm new to this aspect. 1. Is it still building? That link doesn't seem to work for me. 2. Do I need to be running Natty? I'm currently running Maverick. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570949 Title: the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
@reif: The short answer is that this bug will not be fixed. For more context, please read these comments in this thread: Comment #110 Comment #188 Comment #197 Comment #201 Comment #202 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 Title: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 570949] Re: the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630711 I think this is the correct bug to watch, but maybe should also be watching id=567908 inhibit session instead of screensaver ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #630711 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630711 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570949 Title: the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 570949] Re: the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video
@Pedro: for what it's worth, I had the reporting of this bug upstream on my TODO list, but it was so far down (as apparently I work under a stack), that I hadn't yet gotten back to it. I've now cherry-picked it. :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570949 Title: the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 675603] Re: rhythmbox crash when opening .pls file from command line
-- rhythmbox crash when opening .pls file from command line https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 675603] [NEW] rhythmbox crash when opening .pls file from command line
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Based on Bug #62430, it appears that Rhythmbox does not yet (?) support .pls playlists via the command line. This bug is very similar to Bug #62430, but is different because rather than just doing nothing, Rhythmbox crashes now. Before I send upstream I figured I'd first ask if others can recreate this. Very simple to recreate: - $ rhythmbox g\'morning.pls ** Message: pygobject_register_sinkfunc is deprecated (GstObject) Segmentation fault - Anyone else? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: rhythmbox 0.13.1-0ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.35-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov 15 10:50:32 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: rhythmbox ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- rhythmbox crash when opening .pls file from command line https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 427168] Re: usb keyboard settings (repeat rate and delay) reset on plugin
I will update my machine in about a week, and will run through this as a test. I always do a fresh install of my system partition rather than the update procedure I gather you've done. I don't expect there to be a difference, but we'll know for sure then. Darn, I was hoping this would be fixed, especially after Oliver's good work (and upstream too!) -- usb keyboard settings (repeat rate and delay) reset on plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
sk8erbender: Thank you for the bug confirmation. However, Dylan McCall put it succinctly in comment #202: The source of this problem is really close to the heart of the panel's design. It allows user-defined positions for applets, and these are stored with absolute values (in pixels). No amount of fiddling will change that that is a very poor, inflexible design. Unless a dev corrects me, this bug will not be fixed. It will only go away when a replacement is enacted, or there is a complete redesign of the fundamental panel code architecture and assumptions. In the meantime, there are a number of workarounds in the discussion above, but for now, this paper cut will continue to bleed. Some workaround suggestions in the comments above: Comment #110 Comment #197 Comment #201 -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 435008] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in pa_dbus_wrap_connection_free()
This was a bug report for Karmic *alpha*, my attempt to be helpful a year ago. My guess is it no longer has much of a chance to be so, especially as *loads* of work has been done on the sound subsystem in the intervening year. If the problem reoccurs, I'll open a new ticket. Closing this ticket ... ** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in pa_dbus_wrap_connection_free() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 285999] Re: gnome-terminal tabs switch is slow when maximized
I have noticed this for awhile, and finally have had the nerve to investigate. Like SabreWolfy, I can confirm that it still exists for Lucid 10.04.1. I'll upgrade to Maverick likely this weekend, and will test it then. If it still exists, I'll change the Fix Released setting of this bug as I'm not the only one still experiencing this bug. $ apt-cache policy libvte9 libvte9: Installed: 1:0.23.5-0ubuntu1.1 Candidate: 1:0.23.5-0ubuntu1.1 Version table: *** 1:0.23.5-0ubuntu1.1 0 500 http://archive.linux.duke.edu/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:0.23.5-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.linux.duke.edu/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages $ apt-cache policy gnome-terminal gnome-terminal: Installed: 2.30.2-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.30.2-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.30.2-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.linux.duke.edu/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.29.6-0ubuntu5 0 500 http://archive.linux.duke.edu/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages -- gnome-terminal tabs switch is slow when maximized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285999 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 285999] Re: gnome-terminal tabs switch is slow when maximized
I believe these to be the relevant upstream bug reports. Unfortunately, it would appear that fixing this performance issue is not high on the priority list: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350015 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439247 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532816 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572210 (And unfortunately for us power users, a paper cut this is not since, by the fact that we use the terminal extensively, we are not the average user!) ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #350015 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350015 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #439247 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439247 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #532816 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532816 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #572210 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572210 -- gnome-terminal tabs switch is slow when maximized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285999 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 259186] Re: gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk
Just tested this in Lucid. This does indeed seem fixed. Thanks, bug watch updater. -- gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
Given the number of duplicates and people subscribed to this bug, I thought I'd offer a workaround that I recently discovered: Docky. As I currently see it, the gist of docky is to recreate, in open-source fashion, the OS X dock. On OS X I find the dock annoying, but since installing Docky, I rather enjoy it. I believe it only available if you're running Karmic or newer. For Lucid, it's already part of the repositories: $ sudo apt-get install docky If you're running Karmic, I direct you to the docky site, but it's basically 3 command line operations, not one: http://www.go-docky.com/ For myself, I've even gained some vertical space on my screen because I'm now able to remove the bottom panel, after enabling fade away in Docky. A suggestion. -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
Thank you Chancellor, I stand corrected on that front. Apologies to any I might have insulted by my OS X Dock recreation description. Regardless, I suggest it's a good concept, or at least a usable workaround to this fairly annoying bug. -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 570949] Re: the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video
I'd report this upstream (as upstream is where things get fixed!), but, like Charlie, I don't know where to report it. I am happy to do the hard work of sending this upstream if someone could direct me to the correct project. -- the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 570949] Re: the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video
This bug was marked incomplete. Why? It still very much exists. ** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 367512] Re: unnecessary screensaver interruption
Heh, I was fully prepared to be patient when I reported this wishlist item over a year ago. :-) I didn't know how to report this bug to Jamie Zawinksi (xscreensaver fella), so I ended up writing him an email. I imagine he gets hundreds of emails per day, and since I didn't get a response back I didn't know if it had been lost. Then I posted it here. I'm actually not sure if this is a screensaver issue, or a window manager issue, so I punted and just posted. In other words, does the screensaver need to even know that those events happened? I don't think so. Some other thoughts: if screen has been turned off (not just black or running a screensaver), then there's no need to turn the screen back on. For example, from the decibel output of the speakers it will be clear if the volume has been turned up or down. -- unnecessary screensaver interruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 367512] Re: unnecessary screensaver interruption
P.S. Thanks for posting upstream. I should have done that last year, but apparently got overwhelmed at that point in time. -- unnecessary screensaver interruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 570949] Re: the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video
I can confirm on Lucid. With both gnomescreensaver and and xscreensaver installed. I not sure where the problem lies, but judging as best I can with my rudimentary debugging skills, the attached dbus output would seem to imply that - totem (1.774) is sending an Inhibit signal, - the ScreenSaver (1.602) receives that request and then informs the SessionManager. - Meanwhile, the SessonManager turns around and responds false for a check of IsInhibited for some reason (return reply_serial=1926: boolean false). ** Attachment added: Totem dbus interaction. Why won't it inhibit the screensaver? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47168042/totem.dbus -- the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 570949] Re: the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video
For reference, attached is the output of $ dpkg -l | grep -E totem|screensaver In other words the exact packages I'm using and other info. ** Attachment added: package versions, uname, etc. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47168729/installed_packages.txt -- the screen is blanked even if totem is playing a video https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 569649] Re: workspace switcher mouseover text incorrect
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 145704 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145704 Damn, sorry. I tried to search thoroughly first. Obviously not thoroughly enough. -- workspace switcher mouseover text incorrect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to libwnck in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 569649] Re: workspace switcher mouseover text incorrect
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 145704 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145704 Err, if it's been reported, do you have a bug number? That would make this report a duplicate, not invalid, right? -- workspace switcher mouseover text incorrect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to libwnck in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 569649] Re: workspace switcher mouseover text incorrect
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 145704 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145704 Ah there it is. The bug report is active since Sep, 2007, but has a misleading subject: Bug #145704 ** Changed in: libwnck (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 145704 Same tooltip on both workspaces when using Compiz -- workspace switcher mouseover text incorrect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to libwnck in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 569649] [NEW] workspace switcher mouseover text incorrect
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel With a default Ubuntu Lucid RC install, all updates applied as of 24 Apr 2010, the workspace switcher mouseover text always reads: Current workspace: Workspace 1 Even if the current workspace is 2, 3, or 4, it always reads as Workspace 1 This is obviously a low priority bug, but I don't know how to mark it as such. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gnome-panel 1:2.30.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Apr 25 00:30:19 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Beta amd64 (20100406.1) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-panel ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- workspace switcher mouseover text incorrect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 569649] Re: workspace switcher mouseover text incorrect
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45271132/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45271133/GConfNonDefault.txt -- workspace switcher mouseover text incorrect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 569649] Re: workspace switcher mouseover text incorrect
Oh, of note, I can confirm this behavior on two separate installs of Lucid, 64bit. -- workspace switcher mouseover text incorrect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 317855] Re: Shut Down the Computer-window spawns behind active window
This is still an issue in Karmic, as of today. It's definitely low priority, as I haven't researched it for over a year, but it is annoying. Unfortunately, it's not something that I can reproduce reliably. That's why it's so low priority ... because it only happens between 50 and 75 percent of the time. Further note: have only noticed it when I push the power button on my laptop. That is, the window usually pops up in response to me pushing the power button. When it doesn't, I have to hunt for it's flashing taskbar icon so that I can shut down or suspend my computer. -- Shut Down the Computer-window spawns behind active window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317855 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 510238] [NEW] small screen resolution: taskbar icons on top of system menu
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-control-center I normally have 1280x800 resolution. However, sometimes I need to mirror my display to a project or presentation. Depending on the projector, this can reduce my screen resolution to 800x600. The issue is with the taskbar quicklaunch icons. As shown in after.png, the icons are drawn behind the System menu. This isn't so bad, except that if I click on the system menu to restore my screen resolution, the action of the taskbar is to click the underlying icon. 1. The presentation of icon and system menu is not consistent with the Behind the scenes of what actually happens during interaction. They should be consistent. 2. I think the correct behavior is to leave access to the system menus, not the icons, so the behind the scenes is what should change; the icons should *not* be drawn over top of the system menus. A plan of action: if there is not enough room to display the quicklaunch icons, don't. Instead, either do a slideshow effect, or place a down triangle there which can be clicked to expand to the list of quicklaunch icons. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jan 20 12:11:14 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: gnome-control-center 1:2.28.1-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.53-generic SourcePackage: gnome-control-center Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic x86_64 ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug gnome resolution taskbar -- small screen resolution: taskbar icons on top of system menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510238 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 510238] Re: small screen resolution: taskbar icons on top of system menu
** Attachment added: System menus and icons at full screen resolution http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38154359/before.png ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38154360/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38154361/XsessionErrors.txt -- small screen resolution: taskbar icons on top of system menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510238 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 510238] Re: small screen resolution: taskbar icons on top of system menu
** Attachment added: System menus and icons at reduced screen resolution http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38154382/after.png -- small screen resolution: taskbar icons on top of system menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510238 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 510238] Re: small screen resolution: taskbar icons on top of system menu
Yep, thank goodness I'm a keyboard person so I could figure that out. Is there an upstream bug related to this? I looked in a couple of places, but I'm not really sure for what I'm looking. This is a bigger deal to folks less Linux savvy than us. Case in point: I've known about and dealt this problem for over 3 years. My advisor, however, recently made the switch to Ubuntu, and re-pointed this out to me when he couldn't resize his screen back to a normal usage. (He regularly switches back and forth as he uses his tablet to teach classes and give class notes.) -- small screen resolution: taskbar icons on top of system menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510238 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 429852] Re: Please implement ability to move audio streams in gnome-volume-control
Sounds good. Thank you for the summary change and specificity correction. -- Please implement ability to move audio streams in gnome-volume-control https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429852 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-media in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 435008] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in pa_dbus_wrap_connection_free()
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32295117/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32295119/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32295120/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32295121/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32295122/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32295123/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32295124/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32295125/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in pa_dbus_wrap_connection_free() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 228297] Re: shift+alt+tab semi-reverses window switcher
A data point: this bug appears to be fixed in Jaunty. (Gnome v2.26.1) -- shift+alt+tab semi-reverses window switcher https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228297 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 225475] Re: return from dim not to full brightness
A data point: on Jaunty, this has slightly improved. Now, it reverts back to what it was when I plug in the power. But, it always seems to go to 50% brightness or less when I unplug the power. So, if I had set battery to 85% brightness and power to 100% brightness, unplugging would then result in 50% brightness: 1- AC power (100%) 2- Battery (50%) - manually change to 85% 3- AC power (100%) 4- Battery (50%) - it lost my settings. -- return from dim not to full brightness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225475 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 367325] Re: show file name while burning image
Heh, I wasn't vying for a back-port. I was vying for a let-the-devs- know. Rereading what I wrote a couple of months ago, I suppose it came across confrontational. That was not my intent. Suffice it to say, this is a low priority bug. If it's still there in Karmic, I'll sound the alarm. Until then, I wouldn't worry about it. -- show file name while burning image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367325 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified
Apologies. Forgot about this bug in my inbox, after 3 weeks of traveling. Yes, this is reproducible. The steps I provided in the description still produce the issue, even in Jaunty. What more would you like? Shall I create a script? -- trash file systems not unified https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified
Hmm, this now seems to work /almost/ flawlessly for USB keys, and I assume as well for filesystems that get mounted ad-hoc. It still doesn't work for the use case of a file system owned by me and mounted automatically by fstab (as suggested in the description). I'll post a semi-script shortly. -- trash file systems not unified https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified
Human script: 1. Open a terminal # Part 1: create empty directory in $HOME, and mount different file system to it. # Different filesystem will exist entirely in RAM, and will take at most 5M. $ cd ~ $ mkdir tmp_tester $ sudo mount -t tmpfs -o size=5M,uid=1000,gid=1000 trash_test tmp_tester # Part 2: create 512K file in new file system $ cd tmp_tester $ dd if=/dev/zero of=./aFile bs=512K count=1 # Part 3: recreate behavior, note new Trash area not accessible via GUI $ ls -lA # list files, including hidden stuffs. Note lack of .Trash-1000/ directory. $ gnome-open .# should open a window viewing the contents of this directory [ ... remove the file by striking delete on your keyboard ... ] [ *** Where did the file go? It's still there, the bytes are still tied up, but you can't empty this file system's trash.*** ] [ ... either close the window or otherwise return to the terminal ... ] $ ls -lA # Note that .Trash-1000/ now exists. In it you find the file you removed via the GUI. Thus, it's possible to finally remove the file, but not via the GUI. -- trash file systems not unified https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified
Still exists, although in a semi-reduced form, as explained in the comments below. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- trash file systems not unified https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 370615] Re: video thumbnailer uses too many resources.
No news. I did send the bug upstream. It's such a small issue, and one that is likely only noticed by geeks, power nuts, or folks who haven't yet put 2 and 2 together (and they will because they're savvy enough to use Bittorrent or otherwise mess with large files) that I didn't worry about it. Besides, it's easily enough remedied by simply closing the nautilus window. Maybe I'll have time to do a proper upstream bug search in about a month, but until then, I have only 3 minute intervals. -- video thumbnailer uses too many resources. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 370615] Re: video thumbnailer uses too many resources.
Blast. That would be did *not* send the bug upstream. ** Package changed: totem (Ubuntu) = nautilus (Ubuntu) -- video thumbnailer uses too many resources. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified
** Package changed: ubuntu = nautilus (Ubuntu) -- trash file systems not unified https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 367325] Re: show file name while burning image
Having been through this before, I'll get a very similar response. There is a very wide gap between the end-user-seeing-a-bug-in-in- use-software and the developer-developing-on-the-cutting-edge. As a semi-educated end-user, I don't know how to cross that bridge effectively enough for developers. In some sense, launchpad *is* that interface for me (and I imagine lots of others). I'd love to help the open source and Free software worlds, but a developer I am not. I'm an end-user, and there are folks (such as yourself?) who know how to effectively talk to developers. In the mean time, I'm *not* running Jaunty, nor will I be in the near future. This bug will have to wait until someone either cares, or I update to the latest and greatest. Given the stability factor of Jaunty, I'm guessing my update won't be coming first. -- show file name while burning image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367325 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 367325] Re: show file name while burning image
No, Intrepid. Given the reports of lack-of-stability, I'll be waiting to upgrade for at least a month, if not just skip the cycle. These seem to be the pertinent details devs want: $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: . . Ubuntu Description: . . . Ubuntu 8.10 Release: . . . . . 8.10 Codename: . . . . . intrepid $ uname -a Linux hani 2.6.27-11-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 20:53:41 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ dpkg -l | grep brasero ii brasero . . . . . . . 0.9.1-0ubuntu3~intrepid1 . . CD/DVD burning application for GNOME ii libbrasero-media0 . . 0.9.1-0ubuntu3~intrepid1 . . CD/DVD burning application for GNOME - runtime librarie -- show file name while burning image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367325 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 367325] Re: show file name while burning image
Would set priority of this bug to low, but I don't seem to know how, or maybe I don't have the access ... -- show file name while burning image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367325 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 367325] Re: show file name while burning image
A further thought ... if normally only make the basename were initially visible, but on some sort of interaction (mouseover? button?) display the complete path name, I'd say that could be helpful as well. I *usually* don't need the complete path name, but it would have been useful a couple of times in the past. ** Package changed: ubuntu = brasero (Ubuntu) -- show file name while burning image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367325 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 335255] Re: incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention
1. Yes, every time. 2. Just tried on Jaunty. The issue is still there, although it takes a *much* longer time to reach it: It takes 300 seconds to timeout. Now, it correctly removes the interaction dialog (user credentials), but still has the explanation dialog. I think the reaction from Ubuntu in this particular use case should just remove the interaction and be done. When it's clear that the user just forgot about it, there's no need to clutter the interface with Yet Another box saying what happened. This is a semi-cosmetic thing, so no big deal really, but I can't imagine it would be that hard to either add a timeout function to just make it disappear, or to not have it timeout at all. Tangentially, the Intrepid version did at least give possible reasons, which for other NoReply reasons, is a good thing. Jaunty now has *just*: DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Message did not receive a reply (timeout by message bus) -- incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 335255] [NEW] incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gvfs Mounting a file system times out, with (forgetful) user-intervention is required. Steps to reproduce: 1. Create a partition on your local hard drive, something that nautilus will place under Places in the left pane. 2. Click on it, so that Nautilus tries to mount it. -- You should be presented with an Authenticate dialog -- 3. Intentionally forget about the box, and don't enter a password. In a few seconds, you should see an Unable to mount ... dialog box, with the error message DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible ... I believe this dialog box should not appear. In this case, the delay is not a failure of the system or hardware, but of the user to type a password. Possible remedies: - Include a (visible) timer so as to remove the dialog box if there is no interaction. - Leave the dialog box there. Either way, the NoReply error message is unnecessary in this known context. ** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 335255] Re: incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention
This is obviously a low-priority bug. -- incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 335255] Re: incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention
This is likely related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/288543. However, I claim it is unique because the behavior in this case should instead either have no timeout, or should timeout and remove the user interface part. -- incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 335255] Re: incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention
$ uname -a Linux hani 2.6.27-11-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 29 19:28:32 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 Codename: intrepid ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gvfs - Mounting a file system times out, with (forgetful) user-intervention is + Mounting a file system times out, when (forgetful) user-intervention is required. Steps to reproduce: 1. Create a partition on your local hard drive, something that nautilus will place under Places in the left pane. 2. Click on it, so that Nautilus tries to mount it. -- You should be presented with an Authenticate dialog -- 3. Intentionally forget about the box, and don't enter a password. In a few seconds, you should see an Unable to mount ... dialog box, with the error message DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible ... I believe this dialog box should not appear. In this case, the delay is not a failure of the system or hardware, but of the user to type a password. Possible remedies: - Include a (visible) timer so as to remove the dialog box if there is no interaction. - Leave the dialog box there. Either way, the NoReply error message is unnecessary in this known context. ** Tags added: dbus mount nautilus timeout user -- incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 259186] Re: gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk
No need to reopen this bug if it's fixed, but a data point: I wonder if the internal issue was that the vfs/gnome-screenshot was checking for enough free space prior to saving? If so, I believe the RAMFS doesn't report that. So, my workaround was to change that dir to tmpfs: $ sudo mount -t tmpfs -o size=4M,noatime,mode=755,uid=kevin,gid=kevin kevins_ram_disk ~/ram The tmpfs requires a size (e.g. 4M) and therefore lets the VFS check this. It's still a bug that it couldn't deal well with ramfs , but it's actually better to have a size limitation for my uses anyway ... -- gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically
No, not yet. As per usual, things in my life have cropped up. I won't even attempt until after 23 Nov. Suggest to close this bug. I have it marked in my TODO list for after 23 Nov to send upstream, and then send a pointer to y'all. -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically
No, not yet. Given Sebastien's indication that I haven't clearly explained the problem, I need to refine the problem I think I'm seeing. I haven't yet taken the time to do that. Given your attentions to other, more important bugs and the upcoming releases, suggest you close this ticket, and I'll reopen it when there's some activity. -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically
Alright, pardon the noise, I'll take it upstream. -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically
* Is this reproducible? It seems to be. I haven't put 100% effort into drilling out how because I'm used to just using the underlying command line utility (tar, zip, etc.). In the mean time, I got lazy and went with the double-click on email attachments, hence file-roller. * If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? The attachment image is indicative of the last few email attachments I've received ... which I suppose would be all zip files with a few nested directories and files. I'll make a few dummy zip and/or tar files this evening and attach those. -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically
Okay, researching it more thoroughly now, I think the issue is that even when I sort by location, file-roller wants to keep the directories sorted together. This is incorrect, in my opinion. If I sort by location, the entries should be sorted *by location*. In the BaseDir screenshots I've posted (tarred so as to make one attachment), you'll note that the BaseDir is not sorted properly, I suspect because the directories are sorted alphabetically together, then the rest. The directory BaseDir contains all the rest, is rooted at / as far as file-roller is concerned (another bug, in my opinion), and so should be sorted first. In the Dirs-sorted-wrong series, note that Edir is separated from it's sibling Edir entries in the images. This is not correct for sorted by location, in my opinion. Does this help to explain what I think is incorrect? ** Attachment added: gzipped tarball of file-roller screenshots and associated archives to highlight Location sorting error http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18452817/file-roller-bug-pix-and-zips.tgz -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 281440] [NEW] archive should order contents hierarchically
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: file-roller In using file-roller, I note that I'm unable to order the contents hierarchically and whatever-else-ically. That is, if I order by date, and then by hierarchy, I should see the root of a folder, then it's contents. If you wanted to be clever, you might make it a tree hierarchy that could be dynamically expanded and reduced, like the common paradigm of a file system. Besides, what are archive files but a just another file system? In the attached screenshot, the location column should help explain what I'm talking about. I've ordered the archive by the location column, yet I can't see any discernible order. Since the SC08-Matlab directory contains all the other items, shouldn't it sort to the top or bottom of the list? Similarly, it should be possible to order by multiple columns. Like how you can in OO.o/Calc or MS/Excel. A user interface paradigm might be to just stable-sort the items based on the column the user clicks. Thus, to sort by location, then size, I'd click on Size column, then the Location column. $ apt-cache policy file-roller file-roller: Installed: 2.22.3-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.22.3-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.22.3-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.22.2-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release:8.04 Codename: hardy ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Oct 10 16:11:15 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/file-roller NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: file-roller 2.22.3-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: PATH=/home/username/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: file-roller Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic x86_64 ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically
** Attachment added: Shows weird ordering of file-roller http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18419288/file-roller-ordering-screenshot.png ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18419289/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18419290/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18419291/ProcStatus.txt -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically
Sorry, I didn't reread after writing my train-of-thought. The first paragraph should have said: ... else-ically. That is, if I order location (hierarchy), I should see a folder, then it's contents. If ... -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically
Sorry for previous comment noise: totally forgot that I could just update the description. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: file-roller In using file-roller, I note that I'm unable to order the contents - hierarchically and whatever-else-ically. That is, if I order by date, - and then by hierarchy, I should see the root of a folder, then it's - contents. If you wanted to be clever, you might make it a tree - hierarchy that could be dynamically expanded and reduced, like the - common paradigm of a file system. Besides, what are archive files but a - just another file system? + hierarchically and whatever-else-ically. That is, if I order by + location (hierarchy), I should see a folder, then it's contents. If you + wanted to be clever, you might make it a tree hierarchy that could be + dynamically expanded and reduced, like the common paradigm of a file + system. Besides, what are archive files but a just another file system? In the attached screenshot, the location column should help explain what I'm talking about. I've ordered the archive by the location column, yet I can't see any discernible order. Since the SC08-Matlab directory contains all the other items, shouldn't it sort to the top or bottom of the list? Similarly, it should be possible to order by multiple columns. Like how you can in OO.o/Calc or MS/Excel. A user interface paradigm might be to just stable-sort the items based on the column the user clicks. Thus, to sort by location, then size, I'd click on Size column, then the Location column. $ apt-cache policy file-roller file-roller: Installed: 2.22.3-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.22.3-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.22.3-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.22.2-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release: 8.04 Codename: hardy ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Oct 10 16:11:15 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/file-roller NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: file-roller 2.22.3-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: PATH=/home/username/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: file-roller Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic x86_64 -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes
Sorry, I should have gotten back to this sooner. My point with this bug report was not that I had my settings set properly for the exact setup (I do, but I have to remember to start pulseaudio, currently), but that Rhythmbox dies. A program should /not/ just die; Rhythmbox should *gracefully* handle the error and not just crash. Juxtapose this behavior with, say, Amarok. Amarok deals with no sound- server much more gracefully. I'll give you that it could be an ALSA configuration issue, but if so, it's a parallel issue. This may be related as well: if I'm using Rhythmbox and switch to a tty (e.g. Ctrl+Alt+F1), the connection gets broken (or something) and Rhythmbox dies. Again, juxtapose this behavior with Amarok: it doesn't die, and continues to play sound normally. Suggest not closing this bug, or otherwise help me better articulate where to find the bug *in Rhythmbox*. -- no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes
For the record: aplay *successfully* plays wav files when pulseaudio is running (as expected) aplay does *not* work when pulseaudio is stopped (as expected) (*** PULSEAUDIO: Unable to connect: Connection refused) Again: the issue is whether Rhythmbox gracefully handles an unexpected condition, not whether my settings are correct. -- no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes
** Description changed: + Problem (added after discussion): + + Rhythmbox freezes when no sound-server is available. This is *not* + correct behavior. Though there may be another configuration issue as + well, Rhythmbox freezing is the issue. It should not freeze, and should + gracefully handle unexpected conditions. To enable healthy competition, + I'll note that Amarok handles this unexpected condition just fine. + Short version: If there is no sound server started, and I attempt to play a song, Rhythmbox freezes. Starting the sound server manually afterward does not help, and I have to force-quit Rhythmbox and reopen. System info: $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release: 8.04 Codename: hardy $ uname -a Linux hani 2.6.24-19-generic #1 SMP Wed Jun 18 14:15:37 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux Long version: PulseAudio rocks, and I prefer it when applications play nicely. I therefore don't use ESD (who needs system sounds, since that what seems to start the ESD server automatically on startup?) However I do have some applications still that want direct access to certain devices (notably Twinkle), so I need to manually start and stop PulseAudio. But I forget to hit Alt+F2 and run it sometimes when I boot the machine, and then Rhythmbox just freezes when I try to play media files. Shouldn't the behavior be Whoops! Unable to find a sound server. Do you need to give your sound-server a nudge or set your Ubuntu preferences properly? (or something user-friendly message) instead of just freezing? I also suspect it *may* be a timeout issue, but I've never waited long enough to test for that since I want to listen when I want to listen! ;-) ** Tags added: error freeze rhythmbox server sound unexpected -- no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes
@ Mike, I've updated the description. Even included a healthy competition charge. :-) Does that work? @Sebastien, hmm, okay. From an end-user point of view, all I know is that Rhythmbox freezes. Good call in deducing *where* the problem is, as I mentioned this on the Rhythmbox mailing lists or discussion room (don't remember anymore) and their general reaction was it ain't our fault, but didn't help pinpoint where it might be. Thanks. -- no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 33349] Re: Timeout is too short on dimming
Any news? Has this turned into a blueprint yet? I'm not finding it if it is. -- Timeout is too short on dimming https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33349 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 259186] Re: gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk
Good call. I didn't do a proper cut and paste (again!), but I also do a $ sudo chown kevin:kevin $HOME/ram so that I can write to it, etc. The touch is a good test. I haven't run it from the CLI, so I can't confirm that it's crashing, just that it doesn't work. Helpful, I know. :-) -- gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 259186] [NEW] gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk
Public bug reported: From the department of random-bugs: I've created a ramdisk in my $HOME directory as such: $ pwd /home/kevin $ sudo mount -t ramfs kevins_ram_disk ram/ $ mount | grep kevins_ram_disk kevins_ram_disk on /home/kevin/ram type ramfs (rw) Now, when I try to save a screenshot to that directory: it silently seems to just not work. I don't see the file in the normal Desktop or kevin ($HOME), or /tmp directories. I wonder if this is related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71492 Other information $ uname -a Linux hani 2.6.24-19-generic #1 SMP Fri Jul 11 21:01:46 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release:8.04 Codename: hardy ** Affects: gnome-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 259186] Re: gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk
Bah, I can't operate cut and paste properly. The similar bug would be https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31994 , not 71492. Sorry for my CP ineptitude. -- gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes
what did you select in the system menu, preferences, sounds, music and video option? They're all set to ALSA. Not PulseAudio. Setting to PulseAudio will likely solve my immediate issue but is *not* the point of the bug report. The point is that Rhythmbox should not crash if no sound server is available. It should gracefully handle the unexpected condition. As for the DebuggingProgramCrash, I get this: $ sudo apt-get install rhythmbox-dbgsym=0.11.5-0ubuntu8 ... WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! rhythmbox-dbgsym ... I'm not willing to install software that can't be authenticated, and the instructions on the provided link do not give me a key to add. I will note that I can reproduce this every time. I just turn off or kill any and all sound daemons, then start Rhythmbox and try to play something. -- no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes
I can give you Rhythmbox's debug output, as obtained by $ rhythmbox -d rhythmbox.dbg 21 ... I'm snipped most of the unimportant precursor stuffs up to the point I switched to the window and tried to play a song. ** Attachment added: rhythmbox debug output http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16477611/rhythmbox.dbg -- no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes
Rhythmbox v0.11.5 $ dpkg -l *rhythmbox* [snip] ii rhythmbox 0.11.5-0ubuntu music player and organizer for GNOME -- no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 244324] [NEW] no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes
Public bug reported: Short version: If there is no sound server started, and I attempt to play a song, Rhythmbox freezes. Starting the sound server manually afterward does not help, and I have to force-quit Rhythmbox and reopen. System info: $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release:8.04 Codename: hardy $ uname -a Linux hani 2.6.24-19-generic #1 SMP Wed Jun 18 14:15:37 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux Long version: PulseAudio rocks, and I prefer it when applications play nicely. I therefore don't use ESD (who needs system sounds, since that what seems to start the ESD server automatically on startup?) However I do have some applications still that want direct access to certain devices (notably Twinkle), so I need to manually start and stop PulseAudio. But I forget to hit Alt+F2 and run it sometimes when I boot the machine, and then Rhythmbox just freezes when I try to play media files. Shouldn't the behavior be Whoops! Unable to find a sound server. Do you need to give your sound-server a nudge or set your Ubuntu preferences properly? (or something user-friendly message) instead of just freezing? I also suspect it *may* be a timeout issue, but I've never waited long enough to test for that since I want to listen when I want to listen! ;-) ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 33349] Re: Timeout is too short on dimming
I suppose this is a request for a feature. I /could/ do the command line, but what I love about Ubuntu is that for the most part, I don't have to. It's not a decent enough work around to satisfy this (admittedly picky) user. How does one go about making this a blueprint request? -- Timeout is too short on dimming https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33349 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 33349] Re: Timeout is too short on dimming
slider_idea++; To put some more meat on this from another user, I often will sit idle reading a long web page, figuring out a page of code, or deciding what to write next, and inevitably the screen will get dimmer while I'm in the middle of a thought process. This comes at just the right time to be annoying and distracting to me. If the timeout was shorter, I would turn the feature off completely. If it was longer, I don't think I'd recognize the benefits of the dimming before my screen saver cut in, dimming the screen entirely. What I think would be helpful is two-fold: * People think differently, at different speeds, and with different queues acting as distractions. An option to change the timeout before dim would be awfully nice. Here is where the slider option might fit well. * Other times, I think the timeout would be great set to a shorter value, except for key moments when I'm clearly working. In these moments, it should not interfere at all. An option to perform a mouse gesture / keystroke combination / mouse placement that would temporarily disable or increase the timeout length would be awfully useful. Perhaps the upper right of the screen, or something similar to OS X's hot corners. -- Timeout is too short on dimming https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33349 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 195125] [NEW] accessability enhancement: 5 min fix?
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcalctool I just accidentally maximized gcalctool. Slightly suprisingly that I could maximize it. Then I noticed the buttons all got bigger to fill the space. Also cool. Surprising again, but actually perhaps handy. What if I'm (partially) blind? Then I noticed that the font size of the buttons was still the same (size 12?) as when the calculator was a normal size window. It would be helpful, I think, that since the buttons already scale to fill the container size, why not also have the character font scale to fill the button size? If this is /not/ a desirable action, this could be added as an accessibility option. Merits: - this should be an easy fix, perhaps 30 minutes for someone new to the code, or 5 minutes for a regular maintainer. - another bonus for gcalctool. (Accessibility) - if done properly, should not bloat the binaries since font information is already compiled in or shared. Cool. P.S. Sorry if there's extra information attached to this bug. I'm a lazy snit and clicked the Help-Report a Problem link to get here . . . ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Feb 24 12:23:37 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gcalctool Package: gcalctool 5.20.2-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: gcalctool ProcCwd: /home/kevin ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gcalctool Uname: Linux lina 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 07:42:25 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: gcalctool (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: accessability button fontsize gcalctool -- accessability enhancement: 5 min fix? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195125 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gcalctool in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 195125] Re: accessability enhancement: 5 min fix?
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12174143/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12174144/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12174145/ProcStatus.txt -- accessability enhancement: 5 min fix? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195125 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gcalctool in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 109709] Re: feisty - installed applets (invest, weather) on panel; they don't respond, and I can't remove them
This is directed at Sebastien Bacher, hoping that this adds some more info. I'm not clear on what was needed for the bug report, but I'll try to be responsive if asked a direct question. I can't comment on 7.10 Alpha 5, but with 7.04, the invest applet doesn't work. I'm not sure to what degree it doesn't work, because it /is/ responsive for me, but not at all useful as I understand how to use it: * I can add it to the top panel with right-click - Add to Panel. Doing that places an the Invest purple and white graph icon on top panel, with an associated darker gray area to it's right. * The only mouse action to which it seems to respond is a right-click on the darker gray area on the right. Doing that brings up a menu with Refresh, Preferences, About, and the three Move/Lock/Remove items. * Refresh appears to do nothing. * About brings up dialog box. Only thing of note here is that the link Invest Website points to http://raphael.slinckx.net/invest which gives a 404 error currently. Also, it's linked to the Preferences dialog such that if I open the About first, then Preferences, I have to close Preferences before I can interact with the About box again. Weird. * The Preferences Dialog is responsive for me. Clicking the Add button adds a new symbol with GOOG as the default. I can click on the newly added GOOG text and it allows me to change the symbol. The problem is that the data for each symbol is a flat-zero. Just clicking around now . . . it appears that I can edit all the datum points. Hrm. Perhaps a help dialog explaining what's going on would be helpful. If I knew what was going on, I'd offer to write the text for you . . . With my current guess as to what is supposed to happen and what the Invest applet is supposed to do, the problem seems to me to be that the applet is not collecting any data from the web. Perhaps relevant info: Ubuntu Feisty, Up-to-date $ ps waux | grep invest kevin30389 0.0 3.8 77960 19960 ?SSep14 0:05 python /usr/lib/gnome-applets/invest-applet --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:Invest_Applet_Factory --oaf-ior-fd=33 $ ping www.google.com PING www.l.google.com (64.233.161.103) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from od-in-f103.google.com (64.233.161.103): icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=45.1 ms $ uname -a Linux lina 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Fri Aug 31 00:55:27 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux Anything else I should add? Kevin -- feisty - installed applets (invest, weather) on panel; they don't respond, and I can't remove them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
