[Bug 389857] Re: inhibit applet does not inhibit some user initiated events
I provided a replacement for the inhibit applet ages ago. The replacement supports both the Gnome Applet API and the App Indicator API. ** Attachment added: Replacement for stock Gnome Inhibit Applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/389857/+attachment/2299669/+files/inhibitapplet -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389857 Title: inhibit applet does not inhibit some user initiated events To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/389857/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 697241] Re: [natty] G-P-M Applets Missing
Actually, the report isn't invalid, as the behavior is a regression. gnome-power-manager should depend on gnome-panel-bonobo to support the existing applets or replacement code added to gnome-power-manager. ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697241 Title: [natty] G-P-M Applets Missing -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 697241] Re: [natty] G-P-M Applets Missing
Actually, I checked the rdepends on gnome-panel-bonobo, and gnome-panel depends on it. I believe that the problem on my system must have been due to pre-alpha upgrade of an existing Maverick install. So re-marking as invalid. ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697241 Title: [natty] G-P-M Applets Missing -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 697241] Re: [natty] G-P-M Applets Missing
The applets are present, but unless gnome-panel-bonobo is installed in Natty, none of the bonobo applets are available. So the bug report is invalid, but since we're moving away from those applets, the patch should still be adopted as the replacement for the old, bonobo-based, applet. ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697241 Title: [natty] G-P-M Applets Missing -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 697241] Re: [natty] G-P-M Applets Missing
Attached is a working App Inhibitor fo the Gnome Session Manager that can replace the missing Inhibit Applet. it just needs to be packaged, and to have the icon reference replaced. ** Attachment added: Python AppIndicator for Gnome Session Manager Inhibits. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/697241/+attachment/1789724/+files/inhibitapplet ** Attachment removed: Simple command line work-a-like for Inhibit Applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/697241/+attachment/1783439/+files/toggleinhibit -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697241 Title: [natty] G-P-M Applets Missing -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 697241] [NEW] [natty] G-P-M Applets Missing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager The Gnome Power Manager Applets, e.g. (and specifically) the Inhibit Applet, are missing from Natty. This is also a known issue for Fedora 14. From my understanding of the Fedora bug report, it is a packaging issue. Certainly the code is still present in the G-P-M source repository. I have written a command-line utility to control the inhibit state, which I will attach to provide people with a workaround. It could be grown into a suitable GUI replacement, e.g., for Unity. ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Fedora) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #648072 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648072 ** Also affects: gnome-power-manager (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648072 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697241 Title: [natty] G-P-M Applets Missing -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 697241] Re: [natty] G-P-M Applets Missing
toggleinhibit is a simple command line work-a-like for Inhibit Applet, written in python and using the same D-Bus interface that the standard (missing) applet uses. ** Attachment added: Simple command line work-a-like for Inhibit Applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/fedora/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/697241/+attachment/1783439/+files/toggleinhibit -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697241 Title: [natty] G-P-M Applets Missing -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 688013] Re: Unable to login to any session with gdm
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 654578 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654578 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 654578 Returned to gdm screen after logging in * You can subscribe to bug 654578 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/654578/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/688013 Title: Unable to login to any session with gdm -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 648283] Re: Brasero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files
I have tested the upstream fix at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630651#c12, and it does work. -- Brasero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 648283] Re: Brasero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files
Please note: this bug is marked CRITICAL upstream, and the patch should be applied ASAP for Maverick! The current code distributed with Maverick corrupts/loses data. The fix is a patch to a single file (plugins/burn-libisofs.c). -- Brasero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 648283] Re: Brasero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files
Still broken in 2.32. -- Brasero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 648283] [NEW] Basero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero I was testing to see if Brasero 2.31.92 fixed Bug 614522, but when I made the test burn, Basero only claimed to burn 750MB (see screen capture) of the ~5GB that should have been burnt, and the actual image size is shown below (smaller than even just the md5sum file should be), along with a good burn made using Fedora 11. $ ls -l *.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 noel noel2097152 2010-09-26 12:30 brasero.iso -rw-rw-r-- 1 noel noel 5090373632 2010-03-18 12:17 piccolo.iso This problem is reproducible. I have not tried burning this project to a disc, but it totally fails to create the ISO image. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: brasero 2.31.92-0ubuntu2 Uname: Linux 2.6.36-020636rc5-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Sep 26 13:40:55 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Alpha amd64 (20100601) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: brasero ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- Basero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 648283] Re: Basero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648283/+attachment/1640130/+files/Dependencies.txt -- Basero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 639834] Re: Brasero is useless
Have you tried burning to an ISO file and checking it? As noted in Bug 648283, this version of Brasero is producing total crap for image files, too. Perhaps Maverick needs to revert to a known working version, although it has been a while since there was a working version of Brasero. -- Brasero is useless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639834 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 648283] Re: Basero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #637591 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637591 ** Also affects: brasero via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637591 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Description changed: Binary package hint: brasero - I was testing to see if Brasero 2.31.92 fixed Bug 614522, but when I + I was testing to see if Brasero 2.31.92 fixed Bug 541019, but when I made the test burn, Basero only claimed to burn 750MB (see screen capture) of the ~5GB that should have been burnt, and the actual image size is shown below (smaller than even just the md5sum file should be), along with a good burn made using Fedora 11. - $ ls -l *.iso - -rw-r--r-- 1 noel noel2097152 2010-09-26 12:30 brasero.iso - -rw-rw-r-- 1 noel noel 5090373632 2010-03-18 12:17 piccolo.iso + $ ls -l *.iso + -rw-r--r-- 1 noel noel2097152 2010-09-26 12:30 brasero.iso + -rw-rw-r-- 1 noel noel 5090373632 2010-03-18 12:17 piccolo.iso This problem is reproducible. I have not tried burning this project to a disc, but it totally fails to create the ISO image. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: brasero 2.31.92-0ubuntu2 Uname: Linux 2.6.36-020636rc5-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Sep 26 13:40:55 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Alpha amd64 (20100601) ProcEnviron: - LANG=en_US.utf8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANG=en_US.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: brasero -- Basero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 648283] Re: Basero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #630651 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630651 ** Changed in: brasero Remote watch: Red Hat Bugzilla #637591 = GNOME Bug Tracker #630651 ** Also affects: brasero (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637591 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Basero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 648283] Re: Brasero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files
** Summary changed: - Basero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files + Brasero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files -- Brasero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 24430] Re: connect to server feature don't manage NFS shares
Why is this marked as fix released when it is still a bug in Maverick, et al? -- connect to server feature don't manage NFS shares https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24430 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 630768] Re: brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_builder_add_value()
Same problem here. I think we can confirm this bug. See bug 632078 for the stack trace, et al. ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_builder_add_value() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630768 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 620813] Re: evince crashed with signal 5 in g_malloc()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 622344 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622344 I'm seeing the same, uniquely with Maverick. Selecting, and dragging dropping are really poor in this version of evince. There are quite a few of these bug reports; most marked incomplete. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 622344 evince crashed with signal 5 in g_malloc() -- evince crashed with signal 5 in g_malloc() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620813 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 614402] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 614039 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614039 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 614039 gnome-power-manager crashed with signal 5 in _XError() -- gnome-power-manager crashed with signal 5 in _XError() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614402 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 336416] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
See the currently open bug 614039. -- gnome-power-manager crashed with signal 5 in _XError() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336416 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 616405] Re: gnome-backlight-helper needs policykit password on every gnome-power-manager start
I see it when trying to do a CHECK from update-manager. Same details as posted in comment #2. -- gnome-backlight-helper needs policykit password on every gnome-power-manager start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 202853] Re: Keyboard accelerators interfere with keyboard input
Diuncan, This bug is fixed, and the quoted message describes it. Basically, Jonh changed Vinagre to default to doing the right thing, while leaving in the option for an end user to revert to the old, broken, behavior. ** Changed in: vinagre (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Keyboard accelerators interfere with keyboard input https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202853 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 202853] Re: Keyboard accelerators interfere with keyboard input
See Bug 223060 for the Fix Released information. -- Keyboard accelerators interfere with keyboard input https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202853 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 595555] Re: screensaver can't be interrupted once fade begins
** Tags added: regression-potential x64 -- screensaver can't be interrupted once fade begins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 601401] Re: Monitor dim fails to cancel
** Also affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Monitor dim fails to cancel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
could users having the issue gives detail on what user configuration they use Local user, pam fprint -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
I'm seeing this problem with Maverick today. Installed packages are: ii gnome-keyring2.92.92.is.2.30.1-0ubuntu2 ii libpam-gnome-keyring 2.92.92.is.2.30.1-0ubuntu2 -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 542300] Re: Missing Menu Entries - Lucid Beta 1
Should I see sometihng new when I go into the menu editor? I still don't see the missing entries. -- Missing Menu Entries - Lucid Beta 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-menus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 542300] Re: Missing Menu Entries - Lucid Beta 1
Nevermind. I thought I had seen it update, but I only have gnome-menus 2.30.0-0ubuntu1, not -ubuntu2. -- Missing Menu Entries - Lucid Beta 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-menus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 541019] Re: Brasero silently loses directories
I've confirmed it in the newly dropped 2.30.0 release, and reported it upstream. ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #614522 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=614522 ** Changed in: brasero Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: brasero Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: brasero Remote watch: None = GNOME Bug Tracker #614522 ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New -- Brasero silently loses directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 542300] Re: Missing Menu Entries - Lucid Beta 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 542343 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542343 How is this a duplicate of bug 542343, which had to do with corrupt .desktop entries? What are you expecting to have under System Tools? The only things I have under there are non-core, e.g., VMware and Device Manager. nvidia settings, for example, is under System-Administration. I don't see the Control Center anywhere in the menus, and I've checked the menu editor on 3 separate Lucid installs. -- Missing Menu Entries - Lucid Beta 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-menus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 542300] Re: Missing Menu Entries - Lucid Beta 1
** Changed in: gnome-menus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- Missing Menu Entries - Lucid Beta 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-menus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 542343] Re: gnome-panel will not autostart on lucid
I had checked the .desktop entries, and did not see the type of corruption present in this bug. In fact, some of them were dated to March 8, predating these problems. -- gnome-panel will not autostart on lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 542371] Re: gnome-panel does not start on login
I'm experiencing the same thing. During the last batch of upgrades, there were parsing errors about invalid desktop files missing an entry. ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- gnome-panel does not start on login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 542371] Re: gnome-panel does not start on login
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 542343 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542343 From the log: Mar 19 22:36:07 lucid gnome-session[1630]: WARNING: Unable to find provider 'gnome-panel' of required component 'panel' -- gnome-panel does not start on login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 541019] [NEW] [CRITICAL] Brasero silently loses directories
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero I can reproduce this with brasero on both Lucid and Karmic. I add a directory tree to brasero, and when it finishes adding, there are files silently discarded. The lost directory is: converted-to-tar/DRIVE-I\ \(WORK\)/NJB/DEVTECH/2BPORTED/YACL/ which contains files and a subdirectory. A weird thing is that I have a second, parallel, directory tree: recovered-drives/DRIVE-I\ \(WORK\)/NJB/DEVTECH/2BPORTED/YACL/ which appears completely when I drag both to brasero. The primary difference is that the latter directory contains everything, and the former (failing) tree contains the same tree structure, but only tar files converted from older archive formats found in the source tree. brasero on Karmic works a bit differently than on Lucid. On Karmic, I'll be asked if I want to add the directory, because it is so far down in the tree, and that question will be repeated. On Lucid, I am asked just one. On Karmic, if I had *just* that one tree, it actually works, but if I add that tree along with its peers, it silently fails. On Lucid, it fails in all cases. FWIW, I prefer Karmic's handling, where it offered NEVER, NOT THIS ONE, JUST THIS ONE, and ALWAYS, rather than NO and ALWAYS. I agree that if I want the option at all, I'm inclined to chose ALWAYS, but at least having the options was better than now. Even if I manually repair the project by dragging the missing directory into its place in brasero, brasero will silently drop the contents when burning! ALL FAILURES ARE SILENT. The image contains over 33,000 files and over 1200 directories. Were it not for the fact that I always store an md5sum.txt file in the root of the image, and always verify the burn with it, I would likely not have noticed the missing files until after the data might have been permanently lost. I CONSIDER THIS CRUCIAL TO RESOLVE ASAP! Silent data loss is unacceptable. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Mar 18 11:02:31 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/installer/media-info' NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: brasero 2.29.91-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=C SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic SourcePackage: brasero Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic x86_64 ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- [CRITICAL] Brasero silently loses directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 541019] Re: [CRITICAL] Brasero silently loses directories
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41227931/Dependencies.txt -- [CRITICAL] Brasero silently loses directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 541019] Re: [CRITICAL] Brasero silently loses directories
The same burn works perfectly with Fedora 11 (brasero 2.26.3). And look at the difference in the .ISO file sizes: -rw-r--r--. 1 noel noel 5074489344 2010-03-18 11:36 piccolo-bad.iso -rw-rw-r--. 1 noel noel 5090373632 2010-03-18 12:17 piccolo.iso -- [CRITICAL] Brasero silently loses directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 527721] Re: gnome randomly crashes back to GDM login screen
I believe that this is likely a duplicate of Bug 535316, and should be fixed when plymouth is fixed. toffyrn, can you confirm that the problem goes away if you purge plymouth, or get an upgrade that is expect to happen today? -- gnome randomly crashes back to GDM login screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 527721] Re: gnome randomly crashes back to GDM login screen
Oh, sorry, I hadn't seen that you are on Karmic. I've never seen this issue on Karmic. We have one with the same symptoms on Lucid, but it is related to plymouth. Nevermind, then. :-) -- gnome randomly crashes back to GDM login screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 535318] Re: gdm / X spontaneously restarts
I believe that this is an artifact of bug 535316. -- gdm / X spontaneously restarts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 535316] Re: random garbage on TTY1
Fully upgraded Lucid with plymouth exhibits this problem, which goes away as soon as plymouth (not libplymouth2) is purged. -- random garbage on TTY1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535316 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 527721] Re: gnome randomly crashes back to GDM login screen
Try purging plymouth (not libplymouth2) and see if the problem goes away for you, too. -- gnome randomly crashes back to GDM login screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 535318] [NEW] gdm / X spontaneously restarts
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm This just started after the latest gdm updates. The gdm / X session spontaneously restarts. I am also reporting bug 535316, which started happening at the same time, and wondering if they might be related in terms of a random garbage to a VT causing gdm / X to restart. See also bug 527721, although my X session is on TTY7. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Mar 9 14:59:42 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20091209.1) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: gdm 2.29.92-0ubuntu1 [modified: var/lib/gdm/.gconf.defaults/%gconf-tree.xml] ProcEnviron: LANG=C SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.24-generic SourcePackage: gdm Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic x86_64 ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- gdm / X spontaneously restarts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 535318] Re: gdm / X spontaneously restarts
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40635229/Dependencies.txt -- gdm / X spontaneously restarts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 535316] [NEW] random garbage on TTY1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm See attached image of random garbage being put on TTY1. This is a new phenomena, after the recent updates. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Mar 9 15:00:12 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/installer/media-info' NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: gdm 2.29.92-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=C SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.24-generic SourcePackage: gdm Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic x86_64 ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- random garbage on TTY1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535316 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 535316] Re: random garbage on TTY1
** Attachment added: Photo of TTY1 showing random garbage http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40636615/2010-03-09%2014.53.49.jpg ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40635228/Dependencies.txt -- random garbage on TTY1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535316 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 527721] Re: gnome randomly crashes back to GDM login screen
I'm seeing this now, too, an with TTY7. See bug 535318. -- gnome randomly crashes back to GDM login screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 535316] Re: random garbage on TTY1
Actually, it may have been happening earlier, too. -- random garbage on TTY1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535316 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 535316] Re: random garbage on TTY1
This appears to be related to plymouth. Reverting plymouth to the last known working version,. 0.8.0~-7, clears up the garbage, but mountall depends on 0.8.0~-10ubuntu1. ** Also affects: plymouth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- random garbage on TTY1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535316 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 535316] Re: random garbage on TTY1
I don't believe that this is gdm related at all. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- random garbage on TTY1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535316 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 428115] Re: Does not lock screen on lid close
@Martin, This configured g-p-m to _not_ suspend any more on any lid actions -- Exactly. Perhaps should discuss this on IRC rather than back-and-forth here, but as you note, the bug title is does not lock screen on lid close, not the system does not suspend on lid close. My entries in comment 51 are exactly what I am using on a clean install of Karmic, and they work perfectly. I simply want it to lock. I never want it to suspend just because I close the lid. I, in fact, *hate* that feature. Perfectly happy with how karmic works now, with those gconf entries. :-) -- Does not lock screen on lid close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 428115] Re: Does not lock screen on lid close
I found, on a clean karmic install, that I had to do this: # blank screen and lock on lid close gconftool -s --type bool /apps/gnome-power-manager/lock/blank_screen true gconftool -s --type string /apps/gnome-power-manager/buttons/lid_battery blank gconftool -s --type string /apps/gnome-power-manager/buttons/lid_ac blank to get the laptop to work as desired. -- Does not lock screen on lid close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 77010] Re: Overuse of system beep without volume control
If we are talking about the completion-beep, etc., as described by the original post, SOME OF US WANT IT. I opened a bug report a week or so ago (now fixed) when Karmic started muting the beep on reboot all the time; I had to go in via ALSAMIXER to re-enable the beep after each reboot, and adjust its volume down to about 20% or so (yes, full volume is far too loud). -- Overuse of system beep without volume control https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to libgnome in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 77010] Re: Overuse of system beep without volume control
If we are talking about the completion-beep, etc., as described by the original post, SOME OF US WANT IT. I opened a bug report a week or so ago (now fixed) when Karmic started muting the beep on reboot all the time; I had to go in via ALSAMIXER to re-enable the beep after each reboot, and adjust its volume down to about 20% or so (yes, full volume is far too loud). -- Overuse of system beep without volume control https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to libgnome in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 77010] Re: Overuse of system beep without volume control
beandog, the alsa mixer allows beep to be muted and/or the volume controlled. ** Attachment added: GNOME ALSA Mixer control http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34263119/alsa-mixer-beep.png -- Overuse of system beep without volume control https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to libgnome in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 77010] Re: Overuse of system beep without volume control
Mat, The beep could be re-enabled by the user if he specifically requires it, but I've no doubt that by default all beeps should be muted. In case it wasn't clear, I have no problem with that at all. I only object(ed) when the system changes my settings after I've made them, forcing me to re-do them on each reboot (side effect, I believe, of addressing comment #78). Daniel very quickly fixed that problem, and I've no issue with how karmic is today, nor with the default being set to off. -- Overuse of system beep without volume control https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to libgnome in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 77010] Re: Overuse of system beep without volume control
Mat, The beep could be re-enabled by the user if he specifically requires it, but I've no doubt that by default all beeps should be muted. In case it wasn't clear, I have no problem with that at all. I only object(ed) when the system changes my settings after I've made them, forcing me to re-do them on each reboot (side effect, I believe, of addressing comment #78). Daniel very quickly fixed that problem, and I've no issue with how karmic is today, nor with the default being set to off. -- Overuse of system beep without volume control https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to libgnome in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 454384] Re: Password after screen-saver lock should have the new login lookfeel
** Package changed: ubuntu = gdm (Ubuntu) -- Password after screen-saver lock should have the new login lookfeel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 225210] Re: Nautilus behavior in Hardy changes over NFS mount
@psyco.babe, in what way was this fixed? -- Nautilus behavior in Hardy changes over NFS mount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 448419] [NEW] login screen never powers off display
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm When a computer boots and is at the login screen, after a while the screen will go blank, but the back-light never shuts off. If I were, instead, logged into a gnome session, eventually the display would shut off. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Oct 10 22:19:30 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: gdm 2.28.0-0ubuntu14 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-13.44-generic SourcePackage: gdm Uname: Linux 2.6.31-13-generic x86_64 ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- login screen never powers off display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 448419] Re: login screen never powers off display
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33430015/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33430016/XsessionErrors.txt -- login screen never powers off display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 445674] Re: gdm login displays 12 hour (AM/PM) clock -- I want a 24 hour clock
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33241341/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33241342/XsessionErrors.txt -- gdm login displays 12 hour (AM/PM) clock -- I want a 24 hour clock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 445674] [NEW] gdm login displays 12 hour (AM/PM) clock -- I want a 24 hour clock
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm Karmic insists on presenting a 12 hour clock in the login screen. I want a 24 hour clock. System-Administration-Login Screen no longer has an option for setting a 24 hour clock. If there is an option elsewhere, I haven't found it. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Oct 7 13:45:57 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: gdm 2.28.0-0ubuntu14 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-12.40-generic SourcePackage: gdm Uname: Linux 2.6.31-12-generic x86_64 ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- gdm login displays 12 hour (AM/PM) clock -- I want a 24 hour clock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 445674] Re: gdm login displays 12 hour (AM/PM) clock -- I want a 24 hour clock
In the meantime, what about a non-GUI way? Is there a gconf setting that can go under /var/lib/gdm? -- gdm login displays 12 hour (AM/PM) clock -- I want a 24 hour clock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 349312] Re: Evolution 2.26 does not support import of outlook .pst
@C de-Avillez, thank you! I have installed from your PPA, and imported e-mail, calendar, contacts, and tasks using a couple of my PST files. At first glance, it appears to run OK. There are issues with UI timeouts on large (2GB) files, but at least the process appears to work. I'll take more time to look at it next week, with the goal of switching over all 10GB of Outlook content. -- Evolution 2.26 does not support import of outlook .pst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 413168] Re: Karmic upgrade not shutting off backlight after time
What I see is that after the appropriate idle time, the screen goes blank, I can see the backlight turn off, and then a few seconds later, the backlight comes back on, although the screen stays blank (my screensaver is set to simply blank the screen). -- Karmic upgrade not shutting off backlight after time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 397839] Re: Screen randomly goes off in karmic
@anagor, thanks. :-) -- Screen randomly goes off in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 349312] Re: Evolution 2.26 does not support import of outlook .pst
@C de-Avillez, thank you! If I install the libpst from your PPA, is that sufficient, or do I need an updated Evolution, too? -- Evolution 2.26 does not support import of outlook .pst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 428115] Re: Computer no longer locks on suspend or lid close
FWIW, the indicator-session lock menu item does work for me, as does the Fn-F2 (lock) button, lid close (recently fixed again), etc. -- Computer no longer locks on suspend or lid close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 397839] Re: Screen randomly goes off in karmic
I see a problem: after the appropriate idle time, the screen goes blank, I can see the backlight turn off, and then a few seconds later, the backlight comes back on, although the screen stays blank (that's my screensaver). Is anyone else seeing this failure to keep the screen turned off, and should I start this as a separate bug report? -- Screen randomly goes off in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 349312] Re: Evolution 2.26 does not support import of outlook .pst
I will echo the sentiments of others that I consider this a far more important issue than it is being credited with. Many users have substantial content in .PST files and need to migrate it. Just do a Google search and you'll find so many hits, including from the Ubuntu Forums. -- Evolution 2.26 does not support import of outlook .pst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 349312] Re: Evolution 2.26 does not support import of outlook .pst
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #493049 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493049 ** Also affects: evolution (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493049 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Evolution 2.26 does not support import of outlook .pst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 349312] Re: Evolution 2.26 does not support import of outlook .pst
@Sebastian, I know how Open Source works, and I wasn't personally addressing you. I do feel that there ought to be a higher priority, generally, with respect to migrating users from Outlook, the remaining piece of Office that keeps many users captive to Microsoft. I've had this discussion with folks from Sun in the past, too, who said that they had 20,000 reasons to see it happen. Personally, I have about 10GB of data in an XP VM (for Outlook 2K) to migrate. there is command lines tools doing the job as a workaround for those who really need to do that ... Which command line tool(s) to use to migrate 10GB of mail, contacts and calendar? Mind you, if I wanted to use a usine à gaz approach, I could have done that by now. :-) ... until the change lands I may try using Fedora to do the migration, and then copy the files over to my Ubuntu environment, and see whether Evolution will support putting the data on a volume. I would be happy to sponsor a libpst update if anybody manage to get it to build though What needs to be done? -- Evolution 2.26 does not support import of outlook .pst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 431055] Re: gnome doesn't 'see' cdroms/dvds
gvfs-mount -li shows only my hard drive and media reader (SDHC is inserted); devkit-disks --dump shows: Showing information for /org/freedesktop/DeviceKit/Disks/devices/sr0 native-path: /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1f.1/host3/target3:0:0/3:0:0:0/block/sr0 device: 11:0 device-file: /dev/sr0 by-path: /dev/disk/by-path/pci-:00:1f.1-scsi-0:0:0:0 detected at: Wed 16 Sep 2009 06:39:31 PM EDT system internal: 0 removable: 1 has media: 1 (detected at Wed 16 Sep 2009 06:40:53 PM EDT) detects change:1 detection by polling: 1 detection inhibitable: 1 detection inhibited: 0 is read only:0 is mounted: 1 mount paths: /tmp/cdrom mounted by uid: 0 presentation hide: 0 presentation nopolicy: 0 presentation name: presentation icon: size:5552111616 block size: 2048 job underway:no usage: type: version: uuid: label: partition table: scheme:apm count: 0 optical disc: blank: 0 appendable:0 closed:1 num tracks:1 num audio tracks: 0 num sessions: 1 drive: vendor:MATSHITA model: DVD-RAM UJ-852 revision: RB02 serial: detachable:0 can spindown: 0 rotational media: 1 ejectable: 1 media: optical_dvd_plus_r_dl compat: optical_cd optical_cd_r optical_cd_rw optical_dvd optical_dvd_plus_r optical_dvd_plus_r_dl optical_dvd_plus_rw optical_dvd_r optical_dvd_ram optical_dvd_rw optical_mrw optical_mrw_w interface: scsi if speed: (unknown) ATA SMART: not available -- gnome doesn't 'see' cdroms/dvds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 412152] Re: gnome-disk-utility nags me too much that my disk is failing
There is a patch to fix the bogus reports, and that we should already have that in Karmic. The patch is http://git.0pointer.de/?p=libatasmart.git;a=commitdiff;h=b7f3834654cb05f5a8aae6b2381d548f49d72987. I have verified that the fix IS in the current Karmic package. So is anyone STILL seeing this problem? -- gnome-disk-utility nags me too much that my disk is failing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 412152] Re: gnome-disk-utility nags me too much that my disk is failing
Alan,
Can you see what in the list is claimed as failing? If not, that's a
problem in and of itself -- I hate idiot light reports. Tell the user
WHAT is wrong, not just that something is wrong.
As you note, It should not be the sectors, at least not from
libatasmart4, given the presence of:
+/* We use log2(n_sectors) as a threshold here. We had to pick
+ * something, and this makes a bit of sense, or doesn't it? */
+sector_threshold = u64log2(d-size/512);
+
+if (sectors = sector_threshold) {
+*overall = SK_SMART_OVERALL_BAD_SECTOR_MANY;
+return 0;
+}
+}
and the fact that you don't have any marked as failing. Lennart
Poettering seems to be entirely pragmatic and willing to adjust, so
let's just see if we can find out exactly what is being complained
about, and tweak that too, as necessary.
I don't get errors on either of my 500GB drives, but I'll check my older
SATA drives to see if they have any. That would make it easier for me
to track down.
--
gnome-disk-utility nags me too much that my disk is failing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 412152] Re: gnome-disk-utility nags me too much that my disk is failing
Alan, I have a drive here that generates the warning, but it does have some reallocated sectors, although far below the threshold. Same as the one of yours with 5 reallocated sectors. As I said to mac_v earlier today, I'll pull the code later this afternoon or evening and start digging at this thing. -- gnome-disk-utility nags me too much that my disk is failing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 422234] Re: vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder()
I'm well aware of Karmic's status. Have spent more time running development builds than release builds for more than two years. And *I* can (and did) build my own. But I also care and respect all of those who can't. I think that PulseAudio, Network Manager, Transmission, and others have the right idea: one (or sometimes more) PPA is built regularly, people test early and often, and what goes into the main repository has been better vetted. -- vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 422234] Re: vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder()
Confirming that the upstream patch works. I've build the .deb locally. -- vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 422234] Re: vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder()
OK, after talking with folks on IRC, I've subscribed Ubuntu Main Sponsors. -- vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 422234] Re: vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder()
Håkan, if you look at the top of this page, you'll see that there are two listings. Vinagre: VNC client for GNOME, which is marked Fix Released; and vinagre (Ubuntu), which is marked triaged. Basically, the bug is already fixed upstream, where development happens, and we're just waiting for that to filter down to Ubuntu. Why this hasn't been done by Robert Ancell, who wrote the patch; Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, who is listed as the current maintainer; or Jonh Wendell, the primary author, is a mystery to me. In the meantime, I am attaching a debdiff, in the hopes that it helps move this process along. This is done as a proper patch, using the patch system. ** Attachment added: Incorporates *only* Robert Ancell's approved patch from upstream http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31395582/LP422234.debdiff -- vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 422234] Re: vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder()
Adding again, remembering to click the patch checkbox this time. ** Attachment added: Incorporates *only* Robert Ancell's approved patch from upstream (marked as a patch this time) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31395594/LP422234.debdiff -- vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 422234] Re: vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder()
tomorrow vinagre 2.27.92 tarball will be released, and it will get updated into karmic Good to know. :-) But in the meantime, for the past week, anyone testing on Karmic had a broken VNC client with no functionality, unless they fixed it them-self or installed an alternative. So in my view, either the update should have been rolled back, or the rather trivial fix put in place. -- vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 424688] Re: can't install new software
/home/tay/Desktop/setup.exe Is there some reason why you would expect an MS-Windows application installer to work on Linux? ** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- can't install new software https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 422234] Re: vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder()
** Changed in: vinagre (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu) -- vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 418300] Re: gdu-notification-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_devices()
** Attachment added: .xsession-errors http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31320608/.xsession-errors ** Changed in: gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- gdu-notification-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_devices() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 416529] Re: gdu-notification-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_devices()
Martin, Just got it again today, reporting as Bug 424502. See also bug 418300, which has 66+ dups and is for amd64. I'll let you review my bug 424502, and re-open this if appropriate. -- gdu-notification-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_devices() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416529 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 389857] Re: [karmic] inhibit applet does not inhibit some user initiated events
the new version in the above linked ppa has a patch which might also inhibit the screen saver as well since it will inhibit the gnome session from going idle. I'm not 100% sure though. Does either version (karmic official repo No our the above ppa) inhibit the screen saver? Yes. I am liking your new code, so far. -- [karmic] inhibit applet does not inhibit some user initiated events https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 389857] Re: [karmic] inhibit applet not working
Scott, should this also be inhibiting screen-saving? -- [karmic] inhibit applet not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 422892] Re: vinagre crashed when connected or settings it
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 422234 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422234 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 422234 vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder() -- vinagre crashed when connected or settings it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 422888] Re: [Karmic] Vinagre crashes with fontconfig error
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 422234 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422234 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 422234 vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder() -- [Karmic] Vinagre crashes with fontconfig error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422888 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 422234] Re: vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 422054 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422054 See also Bug 422364 -- vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 422234] Re: vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder()
Unmarking as duplicate of Bug 422054, since that one is not visible. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 422054 vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder() -- vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 422234] Re: vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder()
** Changed in: vinagre (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- vinagre crashed with signal 5 in vinagre_utils_get_builder() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 389857] Re: [karmic] inhibit applet not working
Scott, I have gnome-power-manager2.27.91-0ubuntu1 and I still have a problem. Here are the specifics: I am running VMware. I turn on the inhibit applet so that it says automatic sleep inhibited. The system stays awake while I am working in VMware, but as soon as I move the mouse outside of the VM, the system immediately acts as if the entire period had been idle, rather than ignoring it due to the inhibit applet. -- [karmic] inhibit applet not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 389857] Re: [karmic] inhibit applet not working
Even without VMware, the applet fails to inhibit the screensaver. -- [karmic] inhibit applet not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 43363] Re: network: should list NFS shares too
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 24430 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24430 Still broken, even if I publish the NFS shares via AVAHI, which probably ought to be the connection. My SAMBA shares are shown, and my SSH shares (published by AVAHI) are shown, but NOT the NFS shares, despite being published. If NFS shares are published via AVAHI, they ought to be shown. Ironically, NFS shared published by AVAHI do appear on the Mac, just not on Gnome, q.v., http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=523928 -- network: should list NFS shares too https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
