[Bug 1000537] [NEW] Ignores the fact a sever url has been passed in displays the server list
Public bug reported: when passing url like this xchat-gnome --existing --url=irc://irc.freenode.net/#ubuntu-bugs it still shows the servers dialog box, it also doesn't connect ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: xchat-gnome 1:0.30.0~git20110821.e2a400-0.2ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu May 17 13:52:12 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: xchat-gnome UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-03-31 (46 days ago) ** Affects: xchat-gnome (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xchat-gnome in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000537 Title: Ignores the fact a sever url has been passed in displays the server list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xchat-gnome/+bug/1000537/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1000537] Re: Ignores the fact a sever url has been passed in displays the server list
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xchat-gnome in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000537 Title: Ignores the fact a sever url has been passed in displays the server list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xchat-gnome/+bug/1000537/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 998281] [NEW] Brasero in Precise burns coasters for data projects
Public bug reported: Brasero in precise 3.4.1-0ubuntu1 burns coasters on data dvd projects. It goes through the burn process but once the CD is ejected and reinserted , the CD fails to mount. The CD also fails to mount on 10.10. Burning the same files in Ubuntu 10.10 using Brasero (2.32) was successful. ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998281 Title: Brasero in Precise burns coasters for data projects To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/998281/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 780117] Re: Brasero finishes without error but unusable media [on-the-fly mode] (Ubuntu 11.04 -12.04)
the bug is still is there in Precise, as usual very little change of it being fixed upstream (Gnome) hopefully ayan's ppa would fix this -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780117 Title: Brasero finishes without error but unusable media [on-the-fly mode] (Ubuntu 11.04 -12.04) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/brasero/+bug/780117/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 780117] Re: Brasero finishes without error but unusable media [on-the-fly mode] (Ubuntu 11.04 -12.04)
changing the priority of libisofs to -1 fixed the problem in 12.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780117 Title: Brasero finishes without error but unusable media [on-the-fly mode] (Ubuntu 11.04 -12.04) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/brasero/+bug/780117/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 388904] Re: Nautilus 'Computer' displays redundant labels
Sweet, is it possible to post a screenshot of the result from this patch? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388904 Title: Nautilus 'Computer' displays redundant labels To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/388904/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 725426] [NEW] Brasero ignores CDR burn speed setting
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero I using maverick to burn a ubuntu ISO, I usually use a low speed otherwise the installation CD is not read and fails. On Brasero (2.32) Maverick I put the lowest available (8x) and it ends up burning at 30x ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725426 Title: Brasero ignores CDR burn speed setting -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 626712] [NEW] Rhythmbox opens in minimized mode when plugging in Mp3 player
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Rhythmbox opens in minimized mode when plugging in an Mp3 player device, rather than showing up on the new screen. This is undesirable when considering the device is selected as open with. It gives the false impression to the user something has gone wrong, either system has ignored the request or it has crashed. This is worse for new users. ** Affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: papercut ** Also affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Rhythmbox opens in minimized mode when plugging in Mp3 player https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626712 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 388904] Re: Nautilus 'Computer' displays redundant labels
is there any mentioning upstream why they think incorrectly labeling a partition with size of the disk it is on appropriate? -- Nautilus 'Computer' displays redundant labels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 204434] Re: Thumbnails for 200% zoom are regenerated each time a folder is opened.
open a new bug report -- Thumbnails for 200% zoom are regenerated each time a folder is opened. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 501440] Re: A cleaner Nautilus computer:/// window
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 388904 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388904 I have added to that bug report, but it is confusing as 2 statuses say that it is fixed -- A cleaner Nautilus computer:/// window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 388904] Re: Nautilus 'Computer' displays redundant labels
Is there anyway of removing the eyesore 500 GB Hardisk: in front of the drives. It is rather unnecessary and takes the focus from most info the Name/Label/MountPoint of the partition. Or it should be shown in a smaller and lighter text below the Name/Label/MountPoint. Do I really need to see 500GB so many times, I bought the hard disk I know it is 500GB, I don't need to be reminded of it every day. When one has given a label for a partition there is no need to mention how large the drive the partition sits on, after all it is limited by the partition size. ** Attachment added: currently on Karmic http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37296836/Screenshot-Computer%20-%20File%20Browser2.png -- Nautilus 'Computer' displays redundant labels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 388904] Re: Nautilus 'Computer' displays redundant labels
before on Jaunty ** Attachment added: Screenshot-Computer - File Browser-After Icons.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37296853/Screenshot-Computer%20-%20File%20Browser-After%20Icons.png -- Nautilus 'Computer' displays redundant labels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 501440] [NEW] A cleaner Nautilus computer:/// window
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus In Jaunty the computer:/// of Nautilus was very neat. It only showed you the name of the partition and not the size of the hard disk it is on (like Karmic) Is there anyway of removing the eyesore 500 GB Hardisk: in front of the drives. It is rather unnecessary and takes the focus from most info the Name/Label/MountPoint of the partition. Or it should be shown in a smaller and lighter text below the Name/Label/MountPoint. Do I really need to see 500GB so many times, I bought the hard disk I know it is 500GB, I don't need to be reminded of it every day. When one has given a label for a partition there is no need to mention how large the drive the partition sits on, after all it is limited by the partition size. attached are screenshots of now (Karmic) and before (on Jaunty) Using Nautilus 2.28.1, ** Affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- A cleaner Nautilus computer:/// window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 501440] Re: A cleaner Nautilus computer:/// window
** Attachment added: Karmic with ugly 500GB http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37276010/Screenshot-Computer%20-%20File%20Browser.png -- A cleaner Nautilus computer:/// window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 501440] Re: A cleaner Nautilus computer:/// window
** Attachment added: Neat in Jaunty http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37276035/Screenshot-Computer%20-%20File%20Browser-After%20Icons.png -- A cleaner Nautilus computer:/// window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 501440] Re: A cleaner Nautilus computer:/// window
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- A cleaner Nautilus computer:/// window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 501440] Re: A cleaner Nautilus computer:/// window
I have added a comment on https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578574 not sure if it will trigger interest -- A cleaner Nautilus computer:/// window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 475174] Re: Restore functions like Open in new tab and file association issues with the new webkit-based epiphany
What is everyone on Karmic meant to do ? Can't we just have the option of installing Epiphany Gecko -- Restore functions like Open in new tab and file association issues with the new webkit-based epiphany https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 439818] Re: epiphany-gecko can't be installed
another premature ... from Ubuntu. Epiphany Gecko is far superior to the webkit one. Which is a joke it can't even open in new tabs. If you want a Webkit browser use Chromium, bring back Epiphay Gecko. -- epiphany-gecko can't be installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 275495] Re: nautilus search, when several places are choosen only the latest is searched
Kompute's proposals are cluttered and not pleasing on the eye. Nautilus' current search is great for most of your searches. When you have a folder with many files, you press ctrl + F and you are presented with the cursor already in the search textbox and all you need to enter a portion of the name and press enter. Simple and quick. Unlike Windows XP where you have to answer so many questions before you are even allowed to enter your search text. Please avoid cluttering the basic search window. -- nautilus search, when several places are choosen only the latest is searched https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 409219] [NEW] Computer location incorrectly displays custom icons for the partition once a removable drive is attached
Public bug reported: One of the useful features in Nautilus is to select your own icon for directory items. In the Computer:/// location this is very useful as you can assign meaningful icons to your partitions. But when you plug an external hard disk and new partitions populate the computer:/// location, and when you have removed the drive , on your next reboot all the custom icons you assigned get jumbled and they are incorrectly given to the wrong partitions. I am guessing the issue is how these icons are stored to which partition. Doesn't happen with folders. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: hundredpapercuts -- Computer location incorrectly displays custom icons for the partition once a removable drive is attached https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409219 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 388500] Re: Eye of GNOME appears to conflict with Nautilus' file sorting preferences
couldn't this be fixed if Nautilus used DBUS. Then other applications might know what is going on with the file passed in relation to its surroundings -- Eye of GNOME appears to conflict with Nautilus' file sorting preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
Archive is the correct term in English. Next you will have to change Search to Google in the menus. If there is a need to be more verbose it could be Archive (incl. Compress) , where (incl. Compress) can be in a less contrast text. -- Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 203782] Re: Support low color depth to improve speed
Yes please remove Vinagre, a better gui (one which remembers the password) for the VNC client in the Terminal Server Client would be better. -- Support low color depth to improve speed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203782 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 276036] Re: X BadImplementation error when starting
it might be fixed in Jaunty but not in Intrepid -- X BadImplementation error when starting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xchat-gnome in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 204434] Re: Thumbnails for 200% zoom are regenerated each time a folder is opened.
I am using this version in Jaunty 1:2.26.1-0ubuntu1 and this bugs seems to be there. It might not be regenerating the higher quality thumbnails but it still appears to be. If I reopen the folder (which was set to 200% earlier) the thumbnails it shows are the low quality ones (i.e. they are blurry) then after a while it starts showing the better quality thumbnails. It does it in such a slow manner that it appears to be recreating those thumbnails again. The only difference I have seen is that lack of a white border that appears when a zoom level is increased. I have attached a screenshot comparison, the first is the high quality thumb, the second is the thumb after reopening the folder (i.e. the low quality.) ** Attachment added: comparison, the first is the high quality thumb, the second is the thumb after reopening http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25170824/before%20and%20after.png -- Thumbnails for 200% zoom are regenerated each time a folder is opened. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 201396] Re: Unable to change numeric vaules in about:config
are there any plans on fixing this bug, considering the epiphany webkit has faced so many issues, and in Gnome 2.26 Epiphany Gecko has had worked done it to include a Firefox awesome bar. -- Unable to change numeric vaules in about:config https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 204434] Re: Thumbnails for 200% zoom are regenerated each time a folder is opened.
Great news didn't think this bug would be fixed. Well done. I will now have to test out Jaunty. So did this make Alpha 6 or do I have to wait for the Beta on Match 26th -- Thumbnails for 200% zoom are regenerated each time a folder is opened. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 203782] Re: [Wishlist] Vinagre is very bandwith demaning and should support using lower color depth
What is the deal with all these new remote desktop applications even though they are newer they are so slow compared xvnc4viewer which was developed so long ago. I thought with open source, applications improve over time as the previous code is available. Vinagre and gtkvncviewer suffer from this. https://launchpad.net/gtkvncviewer The only hope left for us is this application called Grdc - GTK+/Gnome Remote Desktop Client http://grdc.sourceforge.net/ Which seems to support color depth http://sourceforge.net/project/screenshots.php?group_id=248852ssid=97818 But unfortunate there are no Ubuntu packages to test -- [Wishlist] Vinagre is very bandwith demaning and should support using lower color depth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203782 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 204434] Re: Thumbnails for 200% zoom are regenerated each time a folder is opened.
Happens in intrepid i.e. there is still a recreation of thumbnails even though you were there before. -- Thumbnails for 200% zoom are regenerated each time a folder is opened. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 225361] Re: Superuser cannot access ~/.gvfs folder when mounted
Me too same problem as Ralph sudo strace -e trace=lstat64 stat /home/pt123/.gvfs/ [sudo] password for pt123: lstat64(/home/pt123/.gvfs/, 0xbffba7b4) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) stat: cannot stat `/home/pt123/.gvfs/': Permission denied Process 8670 detached Linux 2.6.24-18-generic #1 SMP Wed May 28 20:27:26 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux Also before when tar-ing adding an exlude for .gvfs folder still threw an error ( if I recall correctly), but now it doesn't. :) -- Superuser cannot access ~/.gvfs folder when mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225361 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 203782] Re: vinagre should support low colour (color) depth, encodings
It is more of a bug and than an enhancement as Vinagre is practically unusable because of the slowness. -- vinagre should support low colour (color) depth, encodings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203782 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 237990] [NEW] Appearance preferances background doesn't respond to mouse clicks
Public bug reported: Not sure if it is Nautilus but I couldn't select gnome-appearance- properties as a package. I am unable to choose the background in the gnome-appearance-properties using a mouse , but can with the keyboard's arrow keys. Also the CPU usage shot to 95% for gnome-appearance-properties and I had to kill it. I noticed this only after an update to Nautilus yesterday (1:2.22.3-0ubuntu2). Firstly after the update no background image was displayed. For some reason the draw_background value in Gconf editor was turned off. Turning it back on draws the WP. However changing the WP in the gnome-appearance-properties becomes extremely slow and non-responsive to the mouse, you can select the wallpaper using the keyboard. Though the CPU usage shoots to 95% for gnome-appearance-properties till you close the applet. This never happened before the update but there were other gnome packages that were updated at this time. More discussion about it here http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5130635 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Appearance preferances background doesn't respond to mouse clicks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237990 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 201396] Re: Unable to change numeric vaules in about:config
Me too, not being able to change the number of lines scrolled is frustrating -- Unable to change numeric vaules in about:config https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 224162] Re: Cannot add new emblems in Nautilus
Thanks hopefully the patch will arrive soon for Hardy, -- Cannot add new emblems in Nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224162 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 217196] Re: Totem-gstreamer produces artifacts during encoding
I can confirm it too When playing xvid files there isn't a smooth play back in the video. Parts of the picture will get blurry every so often. It has more do with decoding because if you play back around the position where this occurred, the picture is fine. I don't get this problem in Smplayer. ** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Attachment added: Screenshot1.jpg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13420188/Screenshot1.jpg -- Totem-gstreamer produces artifacts during encoding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217196 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 208467] Re: Camera Device button Open F-spot Photo Manager doesn't work
The problem seems to be fixed now. GThumb picks up the camera when it is plugged into the computer using this command in gnome-volume-manager-gthumb %h The camera doesn't get mounted in the Computer section. Even when ignore is selected when Gthumb asks if you want to import the photos. When you open Fspot and choose import photos, it is able to access the camera. Thanks for the fix. -- Camera Device button Open F-spot Photo Manager doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208467 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 208467] Re: Camera Device button Open F-spot Photo Manager doesn't work
I am not sure how you have assign it to Fspot when the same problem occurs for GThumb. -- Camera Device button Open F-spot Photo Manager doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208467 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 208467] [NEW] Camera Device button Open F-spot Photo Manager doesn't work
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Description:Ubuntu hardy (development branch) Release:8.04 Fspot : 0.4.2-1ubuntu (hardy) GThumb: 2.10.6 -- When you attach a camera, it gets placed in the Computer area in Nautilus eg. Canon, Inc. PowerShot A400 / PowerShot A400 (PTP mode) Then when you open it in Nautilus, that on top of the files window appears: This media contains digital photos and a button Open F-spot Photo Manager See Attached screenshot. When you click on this button it opens F-spot manager. Then when you click on import in F-spot you get the error: Error Connecting to the Camera Received could not lock the device while connecting to the camera The problem is that soon as you open camera (as mention earlier) it gets mounted and for some reason it looks other applications including fspot from gthumb from accessing it. But if you right click on the camera in nautilus and unmount it fspot gthumb can access the camera fine. So soon as one clicks the Open F-spot manager it needs to unmount the camera either that or remove that button completely. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Camera Device button Open F-spot Photo Manager doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208467 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 208467] Re: Camera Device button Open F-spot Photo Manager doesn't work
** Attachment added: open_Fspot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12953108/open_Fspot.png -- Camera Device button Open F-spot Photo Manager doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208467 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207566] [NEW] NTFS Trash Problem
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Now in Hardy when you delete a file on the NTFS partition it says it can not move to trash and that you can only immediately delete it. This permanently deletes the file. In Gutsy it would move the file into the .Trash-username folder. This setting in Hardy is very dangerous. esp. for new users that trying out Ubuntu. The Gutsy method was a lot safer, because when you accidentally delete something a standard ubuntu user would know to check the .Trash-username folder. As for a new ubuntu user, they might have a panic attack and end up searching the internet for a solution. Finding that it is in the .Trash-username folder is re-assuring, compared to it is gone forever. Even the warning message is not clear enough too. Do want to delete immediately it should have in it will be permanently lost/deleted. Then you have to ponder how useful is a warning message that comes immediately after the user has requested to delete a file. It is usually after minutes or hours when one recognises they have incorrectly deleted a file. A lot of these new users trying out Ubuntu will have NTFS drives holding their valuable data. This is going to give them an awful experience. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- NTFS Trash Problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 37694] Re: Automatic photo import doesn't work with Canon PowerShot S30
on hardy I am using a Canon Powershot A400. The f-spot-import command is not being run when the Camera is plugged in. Camera gets mounted on Computer:// As Canon, Inc. PowerShot A400 / PowerShot A400 (PTP mode) -- Automatic photo import doesn't work with Canon PowerShot S30 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/37694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207593] [NEW] This media contains digital photos is problematic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Hardy problem. When I connect the USB connection of my camera. The f-spot-import command is not being run when the Camera is plugged in. But the camera gets mounted on Computer:// As Canon, Inc. PowerShot A400 / PowerShot A400 (PTP mode) Then when you open in Nautilus , that on top of the files window appears: This media contains digital photos and a button Open Fspot Manager When you click on this button it opens F-spot manager, the F-spot import dialog doesn't open up. Then when you click on import in F-spot, it doesn't even default to the camera, you have to manually select the camera. Then you get another hurdle Error Connecting to the Camera Received could not lock the device while connecting to the camera So what you end up having to do is re-plugging the camera, and then you shouldn't not opening the camera in Nautilus as that locks the camera. Open F-spot and go from there. I am guessing the heart of the problem is that it is not being recognised as a camera. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- This media contains digital photos is problematic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207593 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207593] Re: This media contains digital photos is problematic
0.4.2-1ubuntu (hardy) -- This media contains digital photos is problematic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207593 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207566] Re: NTFS Trash Problem
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 192629 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192629 But looking at the referred bug, fat32 deletion works fine for me. It is just NTFS drives. -- NTFS Trash Problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 192629] Re: Cannot send files to thrascan from a vfat partition
I was referred to this bug from this bug I reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/207566 But looking at this referred bug, fat32 deletion works fine for me. It is just NTFS drives. -- Cannot send files to thrascan from a vfat partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192629 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 148701] Re: Search function in File browser does not function
remove the asterisks and search for .mp3 or even mp3 This works for me in Hardy beta for me -- Search function in File browser does not function https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148701 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 204434] [NEW] Thumbnails for 200% zoom are regenerated each time a folder is opened.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus When I open a folder with images (around 20 wallpaper sizes), and change the zoom level to 200%. It resizes the thumbnail image, so obviously it becomes blurry. Note this process is completed quickly. Then it seems to create a new thumbnail from the original image with the larger thumbnail dimensions, providing sharper and aesthetically pleasing thumbnails. This process is slow but understandable. If I close Nautilus and open the same folder (it remembers the zoom level), it's using the smaller thumbnails, than the larger sharper ones it created earlier. Then it goes around re-creating the larger thumbnails. Slows the systems down in the process. This it deters you from setting the zoom level up in a folder, it isn't caching/saving thumbnails at a higher zoom. This also occurs if you navigate back and forth to the folder. This only affects the Hardy Alphas. I tried this on Gutsy, it doesn't have a problem as it never tries to get a better thumbnail when you increase the zoom level. When you are testing make sure the images are of wallpaper sizes then you can really see Nautilus upgrading the original thumbnail. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Thumbnails for 200% zoom are regenerated each time a folder is opened. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 203666] Re: Thumbnails for high-resolution images are generated each time folders are opened.
Not sure why is it Gthumb but I can confirm this on Nautilus, Here is the scenario: When I open a folder with images (around 60, large i.e. wallpaper sizes), and change the zoom level to 200%. It resizes the thumbnail image, so obviously it becomes blurry. Note this process is completed quickly. Then it seems to create a new thumbnail from the original image with the larger thumbnail dimensions, providing sharper and aesthetically pleasing thumbnails. This process is slow but understandable. But if I close Nautilus and open the same folder, it remembers the zoom level. But it's using the smaller thumbnails, than the larger sharper ones it created earlier. Then it goes around re-creating the larger thumbnails. Slows the systems down in the process. Because of this it deters you from setting the zoom level up, it isn't caching/saving thumbnails at a higher zoom. It also does this if you back and forth to the folder. I tried this on Gutsy, it doesn't have a problem as it never tries to get a better thumbnail when you increase the zoom level. When you are testing make sure the images are of wallpaper sizes then you can really see Nautilus upgrading the original thumbnail. -- Thumbnails for high-resolution images are generated each time folders are opened. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203666 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 203782] [NEW] Vinagre unusable because of the slowness
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vinagre I installed Hardy Alpha 4, and updated the packages so I am up to date with Alpha 6. When I tried to remotely connect to a computer on my LAN and it was so slow (and unusable)on Vinagre / Remote Desktop client. I noticed TS Client had disabled the option for VNC, installing xvnc4viewer enabled it. Xvnc4viewer was much faster and usable. Are there other settings in Hardy that can be tweaked to fix the awful slowness in Vinagre ? In Vinagre I couldn't find anyway to change settings for the connection. Is there some way of doing this? ** Affects: vinagre (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Vinagre unusable because of the slowness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203782 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 150379] Re: Nautilus built-in search doesn't work if tracker is disabled
If anything it should only be given as a non default option to use a third party application. As mentioned above Tracker it is not practical to have Tracker index remote folders, (in a work environment you will get in serious trouble if pull this stunt) or your / folder.. Nautilus is a not a simple file manager like Thunar, it can open Network shares, and it would be counter-productive if one couldn't search for a file on a network drive, because of Tracker. -- Nautilus built-in search doesn't work if tracker is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150379 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 150379] Re: Nautilus built-in search doesn't work if tracker is disabled
Khashayar Naderehvandi , Why don't you assign a key in Gnome like F6 for Tracker? I do something similar for Gnome-Do Ctrl+F should be for the application itself. In Firefox when I use Ctrl+F it is to search the page I have opened. -- Nautilus built-in search doesn't work if tracker is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150379 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 150379] Re: Nautilus built-in search doesn't work if tracker is disabled
Great news, Ctrl + F here I come -- Nautilus built-in search doesn't work if tracker is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150379 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 148701] Re: Search function in File browser does not function
Great news, I thought this wasn't going to be fixed for Hardy. I am assuming this will reach Hardy? -- Search function in File browser does not function https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148701 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 148701] Re: Search function in File browser does not function
I have opened a thread on the new Ubuntu Ideas website for this. Please log in and vote for it http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/476/ -- Search function in File browser does not function https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148701 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 148701] Re: Search function in File browser does not function
Giving us a reason such as lack of man power is very helpful. It is better for us to know the reason why it is allocated low priority than holding us in the dark. -- Search function in File browser does not function https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148701 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 148701] Re: Search function in File browser does not function
That is ridiculous if they expect Hardy to be LTS. How do they expect to deliver an OS in a corporate function without a basic search tool. -- Search function in File browser does not function https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148701 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 148701] Re: Search function in File browser does not function
I don't know if many of the developers have worked in a non IT work environment. Because in these environments the Project folder and filenames are often used to differentiate files, not the contents as most companies use templates. It would also be silly to expect one to index the data from all the company's projects, as the number of files is so vast. The old Nautilus (6.10) used to do this beautifully and better than Windows XP. The lack of feedback from the developers is very discouraging, and a big deterrent in reporting future bugs. -- Search function in File browser does not function https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148701 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 150379] Re: Nautilus built-in search doesn't work if tracker is disabled
What does Wishlist mean in regards to Importance, I searched the https://help.launchpad.net/FAQ for Importance Wishlist and could not find anything. I found bug statuses but it has nothing on 'wishlist'. https://help.launchpad.net/BugStatuses -- Nautilus built-in search doesn't work if tracker is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150379 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 148701] Re: Search function in File browser does not function
How could this be rated as low priority. It is using Tracker's results when it shouldn't be. There needs to be an option to let Nautilus not use tracker If I navigate to a folder and then do a search all I want is results within the folder. This is annoying before you could navigate to the /usr/share/icons folder and search for contact-new.png and you will get all the varieties of it in thumbnails. With this Tracker search you can't expect us to index our root folder. Also if you search for a general term like you .jpg you will get a zillion results. While with the old search it was specific to a folder. This used to be on feature that Ubuntu excelled over XP now its worse, and useless. -- Search function in File browser does not function https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148701 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 150379] Re: Nautilus built-in search doesn't work if tracker is disabled
There is a some what of a work around, An application called nautilus-search-tool http://saettaz.altervista.org/softwa...arch_tool.html Deb http://www.getdeb.net/app.php?name=nautilus-search-tool That lets your right click on folder and search in it. It brings the search dialog found under places, it sets the folder for you so you don't have to browse to it. But still an option should let you choose what Nautilus search should use. -- Nautilus built-in search doesn't work if tracker is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150379 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 150379] Re: Nautilus built-in search doesn't work if tracker is disabled
Even if Tracker is installed there needs to be an option to let Nautilus not use tracker If I navigate to a folder and then do a search all I want is results with in the folder. This is annoying before you could navigate to the /usr/share/icons folder and search for contact-new.png and you will get all the varieties of it in thumbnails. With this Tracker search you can't expect us to index our root folder. Also if you search for a general term like you .jpg you will get a zillion results. While with the old search it was specific to a folder. -- Nautilus built-in search doesn't work if tracker is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150379 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 126104] Re: emblems are too small
They are in the final Gutsy, and in all themes. Once again what is the point of small emblems. Is anyone here that is pro small emblems? If not why isn't it going to be fixed. -- emblems are too small https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126104 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-icon-theme in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 111830] Re: Make Rhythmbox look decent
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 106462 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106462 I agree the shuffle repeat icons are plain fugly, circa. 1995. -- Make Rhythmbox look decent https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111830 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
