[Bug 424956] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-10-09 Thread twipley
Happens even without a Nautilus window having been opened in the current
session.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424956

Title:
  nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/424956/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1039594] Re: evolution-calendar-factory crashed with SIGSEGV in g_rec_mutex_get_impl()

2012-10-08 Thread twipley
Same than the above poster: evolution-calendar-factory crashed with
SIGFPE in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECTv()

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039594

Title:
  evolution-calendar-factory crashed with SIGSEGV in
  g_rec_mutex_get_impl()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/1039594/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 904323] Re: [Printing] White-margins problem

2012-09-15 Thread twipley
I revert what I said just above: this bug report is no duplicate at all.

The proportion of space margins take upon printing is just too large --
margins are not intended to be _that_ wide.

Anyone else suffering from the same issue, needing to enable select
page size using document page size ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904323

Title:
  [Printing] White-margins problem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/904323/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 551480] Re: pdf: wrong proportions and margins

2012-09-15 Thread twipley
I am not affected by this issue, I have just realized -- the issue that
affects me is present only on page printing:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/904323

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551480

Title:
  pdf: wrong proportions and margins

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/551480/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1043039] [NEW] rhythmbox: plugins required for radio playback

2012-08-28 Thread twipley
Public bug reported:

A few minutes after having begun default-radio-stations playback (this
has been tested for all of the Absolute stations), playback stops;
message appears: Python (v2.7) requires to install plugins to play
media files of the following type: text/html decoder

Under every fresh Ubuntu installation I have seen, it happens that way,
and Rhythmbox has to be restarted for playback to be started back again,
for a sole few minutes before halting the same way as described before.


A workaround for this issue is to right-click the radio station, select 
properties, copy its URL, and then paste it back into a browser, download the 
playlist file, open it using a text editor, tweak it if desired, then open it 
using Rhythmbox -- a new radio station will appear, working this time.

For Absolute Classic Rock, this is the content of the .pls file to be
opened using Rhythmbox:

[playlist]
Title1=Absolute Classic Rock
File1=http://ogg2.as34763.net/vc160.ogg

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: rhythmbox 2.96-0ubuntu4.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic-pae 3.2.24
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Aug 28 21:20:53 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 
(20120817.3)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: rhythmbox
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043039

Title:
  rhythmbox: plugins required for radio playback

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1043039/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1043039] Re: rhythmbox: plugins required for radio playback

2012-08-28 Thread twipley
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043039

Title:
  rhythmbox: plugins required for radio playback

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1043039/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 424956] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-07-24 Thread twipley
Happened to me under 12.10 (quantal).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424956

Title:
  nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/424956/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1014264] Re: totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values

2012-06-20 Thread twipley
Just to be clear, crop values should be unobtrusively detected and
applied, but there would be no need whatsoever, as far as I am seeing
it, for the implementation of crop-values-modification capabilities from
the totem settings.

(The goal merely being to respect the own predefined idiosyncrasies of
the projected media file.)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014264

Title:
  totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1014264/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1014264] [NEW] totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values

2012-06-17 Thread twipley
Public bug reported:

MKV-file headers may contains values to be used for players affecting
top-, left-, right-, and bottom-pixels cropping. Totem does not
currently recognize those header values, and just ignores them.

This can be demonstrated using the mkvmerge GUI program and its header
editor to fiddle with such values, and them running the resulting files
through totem. Another player than totem (VLC) was tried, which
recognized those values, and therefore cropped the video upon playing to
remove the annoying border flickering that was experienced in that given
file, without the need for the stream to be reencoded, and either
suffering from a deterioration in quality, or becoming huge through
lossless reencoding. (Consider this as an argument for the pertinence of
this bug.)

This bug can be experienced under Precise, using the as-of-current
latest build of totem.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: totem 3.0.1-0ubuntu21
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic-pae 3.2.18
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Jun 17 06:41:52 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/totem
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20120423)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: totem
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: totem (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014264

Title:
  totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1014264/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1014264] Re: totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values

2012-06-17 Thread twipley
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014264

Title:
  totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1014264/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 551480] Re: pdf: wrong proportions and margins

2012-02-08 Thread twipley
madbiologist: It is a HP Deskjet F380 All-in-one.

I am just curious, also, as to the reason why that option is not ticked
in by default.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551480

Title:
  pdf: wrong proportions and margins

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/551480/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 551480] Re: pdf: wrong proportions and margins

2012-02-05 Thread twipley
[11.10] -- I too am suffering from this white-margins, improper-scaling
problem.

Printing a PDF file through the Evince document viewer may by default
add white margins both on top and bottom and on both sides. (I have been
able to reproduce this issue using PDF files created through the
LibreOffice PDF-file export, for it to be noted.)

One method to fix the issue -- and it seems to work for all cases in
which a PDF file gets printed with too-wide margins, whether having or
not been outputted through LibreOffice -- is to enable select page size
using document page size by default.

That way, it seems to me, PDF files would get printed the way they
really were intended to be printed.

Should it not, in that case, be best for that parameter to be selected
in Evince right out of the box?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551480

Title:
  pdf: wrong proportions and margins

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/551480/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 904323] Re: [Printing] White-margins problem

2012-02-05 Thread twipley
Actually, this report may be a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/551480

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904323

Title:
  [Printing] White-margins problem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/904323/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 840940] Re: Some resolutions missing from oneiric

2011-10-16 Thread twipley
Alright, I will open a new one with the relevant info -- meet you there!

** Attachment removed: natty-log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+attachment/2372692/+files/natty-log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840940

Title:
  Some resolutions missing from oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 875917] [NEW] Some resolutions missing from Gnome Control Center

2011-10-16 Thread twipley
Public bug reported:

Using a 1680x1050 monitor (in this case, an Acer AL2216W), under
System Settings  Displays, the (double-scaling) 840x525 resolution is
unavailable, even though it is listed in xrandr (see posted log).

That seems to be a regression from natty, as Gnome Control Center
previously would be listing that resolution.

A workaround to this issue of course is running xrandr -s 840x525
through the terminal, even though that way it takes some time for the
system to switch to that resolution (for it to be noted, there was no
such waiting time in natty).

I hope all this information to be helpful to you developers in
investigating the current issue. If any more information would be
needed, do not hesitate to prompt for it; I would then acquiesce in as
much as the situation would require.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.2.0-0ubuntu6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Oct 16 14:46:16 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111012)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
usr_lib_gnome-control-center:
 deja-dup   20.0-0ubuntu3
 gnome-bluetooth3.2.0-0ubuntu1
 indicator-datetime 0.3.0-0ubuntu3

** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 oneiric running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875917

Title:
  Some resolutions missing from Gnome Control Center

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/875917/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 875917] Re: Some resolutions missing from Gnome Control Center

2011-10-16 Thread twipley
** Attachment added: oneiric-xrandr-log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875917/+attachment/2551334/+files/oneiric-xrandr-log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875917

Title:
  Some resolutions missing from Gnome Control Center

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/875917/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 840940] Re: Some resolutions missing from oneiric

2011-10-16 Thread twipley
Bug moved to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-
center/+bug/875917

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840940

Title:
  Some resolutions missing from oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 840940] Re: Some resolutions missing from oneiric

2011-09-08 Thread twipley
@Sebastien Bacher: yes, it does.

Switching to it through xrandr -s 840x525, though, takes nearly as
much as thirty seconds. Same thing for switching back to the native
resolution. Switching to available-in-monitor-settings-window
resolutions was almost instantaneous, conversely. However, as I
previously mentioned, the desired resolution is lacking from that
monitor-settings window (it was present in natty).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840940

Title:
  Some resolutions missing from oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 840940] Re: Some resolutions missing from oneiric

2011-09-08 Thread twipley
I am no longer using Oneiric, unfortunately. I am currently under natty.
Does such a log still matters, then?

** Attachment added: natty-log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+attachment/2372692/+files/natty-log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840940

Title:
  Some resolutions missing from oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 574187] Re: Screensaver asks password when the user is in the password-less login group

2011-07-14 Thread twipley
Would that mean that upon LiveCD installation, one choosing automatic
login to not be nagged by password-input prompts at every reboot
instance also would implicitly be telling the installer  do not ask me
for password every time I am leaving my desktop for more than a few
minutes and the screensaver springs up?

Because to my mind, both go hand-in-hand. Either an user wants to be
protected at his home and wants to be asked about passwords here and
there, or he wants not to be nagged by such incessant normal-computer-
usage password prompts.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574187

Title:
  Screensaver asks password when the user is in the password-less login
  group

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/574187/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs