[Bug 1208993] Re: Ubuntu slows down and hangs while copying file from/to USB

2016-10-31 Thread ullix
Same problem on Ubuntu Mate 16.04.01 with caja, nautilus and nemo. 
Moving only a few dozen files can take several minutes. Files are on one disk 
in same directory tree.

Moving files with mv is almost instantaeous, too fast to measure.

Intel i74771 and SSD and HDs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208993

Title:
  Ubuntu slows down and hangs while copying file from/to USB

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1208993/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1409291] Re: missing toolbar

2016-01-12 Thread ullix
Highly inconvenient!  I am using Okular now, but I liked the old evince
better

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409291

Title:
  missing toolbar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1409291/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 721856] [NEW] Nautilus can't count beyond 4GB in DVD copying

2011-02-19 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: nautilus

Copying a DVD of e.g. 7GB into an *.iso file ends up correctly copied
with a size of 7GB, and during copying the dialog box also shows correct
final size, but once the copy is finished the dialog box shows the size
apparently only modulo 4GB.

Using Ubuntu Lucid 10.4.2 I insert a DVD, the right-click on the dvd icon on 
the desktop and chose CD/DVD copy  I believe this uses a function of 
nautilus. The first screenshot shows an ongoing copy; the dvd size is correct 
at 7131MiB. Second screenshot shows the incorrect finished dvd size of 3.18GB.
When this procedure is done with a dvd of only 2.5GB, the correct dvd size is 
shown both during and after copy.

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721856

Title:
  Nautilus can't count beyond 4GB in DVD copying

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 721856] Re: Nautilus can't count beyond 4GB in DVD copying

2011-02-19 Thread ullix
** Attachment added: big dvd during copy
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721856/+attachment/1860206/+files/Screenshot-DVD7.0GB-copying.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721856

Title:
  Nautilus can't count beyond 4GB in DVD copying

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 721856] Re: Nautilus can't count beyond 4GB in DVD copying

2011-02-19 Thread ullix
** Attachment added: big dvd copy finished
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/721856/+attachment/1860207/+files/Screenshot-DVD7.0GB-finished.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721856

Title:
  Nautilus can't count beyond 4GB in DVD copying

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 721856] Re: Nautilus can't count beyond 4GB in DVD copying

2011-02-19 Thread ullix
** Attachment added: small dvd during copying
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/721856/+attachment/1860209/+files/Screenshot-DVD2.5GB-copying.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721856

Title:
  Nautilus can't count beyond 4GB in DVD copying

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 721856] Re: Nautilus can't count beyond 4GB in DVD copying

2011-02-19 Thread ullix
** Attachment added: small dvd copy finished
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/721856/+attachment/1860210/+files/Screenshot-DVD2.5GB-finished.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721856

Title:
  Nautilus can't count beyond 4GB in DVD copying

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 682347] [NEW] Rhythmbox can't deal with UPnP media from Fritz!Box

2010-11-28 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: rhythmbox

On Ubuntu Lucid with the package rhythmbox-plugin-coherence installed:
Rhythmbox encounters myriads of errors when reading media served by an
AVM Fritz!Mediaserver. On the very same system, totem can find and play
the media (both music and video) perfectly well.

The mediaserver is an internal part of the DSL router Fritz!Box 7270
from company AVM. It reads from an external USB-disk, set up with some
2000 music files and a dozen video files.

Upon starting totem it finds this mediaserver and offers the files
almost instantaneously, but when starting rhythmbox from the command
line, first this is shown in the terminal (note: there is an additional
mythtv video server):

~$ rhythmbox
WARN  coherence   Nov 28 13:32:19  Coherence UPnP framework 
version 0.6.6.2 starting... (coherence/base.py:283)
WARN  webserver   Nov 28 13:32:19  WebServer on port 55235 
ready (coherence/base.py:124)
WARN  rb_coherence_plugin Nov 28 13:32:19  Media Store available with 
UUID uuid:63e3f640-b98c-4e9e-9746-3a646662cddf (coherence/__init__.py:124)
WARN  rb_coherence_plugin Nov 28 13:32:19  Media Renderer available 
with UUID uuid:60942b56-b942-4d0c-a34b-82828e349e64 (coherence/__init__.py:158)
WARN  rb_coherence_plugin Nov 28 13:32:19  start looking for media 
servers (coherence/__init__.py:161)
WARN  rb_media_store  Nov 28 13:32:20  __init__ MediaStore 
{'urlbase': 'http://10.0.0.20:55235/63e3f640-b98c-4e9e-9746-3a646662cddf', 
'no_thread_needed': True, 'uuid': 'uuid:63e3f640-b98c-4e9e-9746-3a646662cddf', 
'plugin': CoherencePlugin object at 0x92d0964 (RBPlugin at 0x9065da8), 'db': 
__main__.RhythmDBTree object at 0x9713414 (RhythmDBTree at 0x89b0040), 
'version': 2, 'icon': {'url': 'file:///home/ullix/.face', 'mimetype': 
'image/jpeg', 'depth': '24', 'height': '96', 'width': '96'}} 
(coherence/MediaStore.py:341)
WARN  rb_media_renderer   Nov 28 13:32:20  __init__ RhythmboxPlayer 
{'shell': rb.Shell object at 0x8f32b44 (RBShell at 0x8929000), 
'no_thread_needed': True, 'uuid': 'uuid:60942b56-b942-4d0c-a34b-82828e349e64', 
'urlbase': 'http://10.0.0.20:55235/60942b56-b942-4d0c-a34b-82828e349e64', 
'version': 2, 'rb_mediaserver': 
coherence.upnp.devices.media_server.MediaServer object at 0x975b64c, 'icon': 
{'url': 'file:///home/ullix/.face', 'mimetype': 'image/jpeg', 'depth': '24', 
'height': '96', 'width': '96'}} (coherence/MediaPlayer.py:37)
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/coherence/extern/louie.py:44: UserWarning: 
extern.louie will soon be deprecated in favor of coherence.dispatcher.
  warnings.warn(extern.louie will soon be deprecated in favor of 
coherence.dispatcher.)
WARN  rb_media_store  Nov 28 13:32:20  __init__ MediaStore 
initialized (coherence/MediaStore.py:431)
WARN  mediaserver Nov 28 13:32:20  Rhythmbox on 10.0.0.20 
MediaServer (upnp_coherence.MediaStore.MediaStore object at 0x97635ac) 
activated with 63e3f640-b98c-4e9e-9746-3a646662cddf 
(coherence/upnp/devices/media_server.py:636)
WARN  mediarenderer   Nov 28 13:32:20  Rhythmbox on 10.0.0.20 
MediaRenderer (RhythmboxPlayer') activated with 
60942b56-b942-4d0c-a34b-82828e349e64 
(coherence/upnp/devices/media_renderer.py:142)


When I then click on the AVM Fritz!Mediaserver under Shared, after a
delay of about 30 sec this output comes up, and these error reports seem
to continue indefinitely:


Unhandled error in Deferred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/coherence/upnp/core/utils.py, line 507, 
in handleResponse
self.factory.page(response)
  File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/coherence/upnp/core/utils.py, line 561, 
in page
self.deferred.callback((page, self.response_headers))
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py, line 280, 
in callback
self._startRunCallbacks(result)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py, line 354, 
in _startRunCallbacks
self._runCallbacks()
--- exception caught here ---
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py, line 371, 
in _runCallbacks
self.result = callback(self.result, *args, **kw)
  File /usr/lib/rhythmbox/plugins/upnp_coherence/UpnpSource.py, line 135, in 
new_process_media_server_browse
seconds = int(h)*3600 + int(m)*60 + int(s)
exceptions.ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '00.000'
Unhandled error in Deferred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/coherence/upnp/core/utils.py, line 507, 
in handleResponse
self.factory.page(response)
  File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/coherence/upnp/core/utils.py, line 561, 
in page
self.deferred.callback((page, self.response_headers))
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py, line 280, 
in callback
self._startRunCallbacks(result)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py, line 354

[Bug 682347] Re: Rhythmbox can't deal with UPnP media from Fritz!Box

2010-11-28 Thread ullix
For completeness:
When instead of clicking on the AVM Fritz!Mediaserver as shown above I click 
on the Mythtv AV Media Server, which serves a copy of the identical files as 
the Fritz-server  (but from the internal hard disk), the files do show up after 
about 20 sec, with these messages in the terminal:


WARN  soapNov 28 13:50:00  error requesting url 
'http://10.0.0.20:6544/CDS_Control' (coherence/upnp/core/soap_proxy.py:60)
WARN  action  Nov 28 13:50:00  error on Browse request with 
urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:ContentDirectory:1 CDS_Control 
(coherence/upnp/core/action.py:112)
WARN  soapNov 28 13:50:01  error requesting url 
'http://10.0.0.20:6544/CDS_Control' (coherence/upnp/core/soap_proxy.py:60)
WARN  action  Nov 28 13:50:01  error on Browse request with 
urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:ContentDirectory:1 CDS_Control 
(coherence/upnp/core/action.py:112)
WARN  soapNov 28 13:50:02  error requesting url 
'http://10.0.0.20:6544/CDS_Control' (coherence/upnp/core/soap_proxy.py:60)
WARN  action  Nov 28 13:50:02  error on Browse request with 
urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:ContentDirectory:1 CDS_Control 
(coherence/upnp/core/action.py:112)
WARN  soapNov 28 13:50:03  error requesting url 
'http://10.0.0.20:6544/CDS_Control' (coherence/upnp/core/soap_proxy.py:60)
WARN  action  Nov 28 13:50:03  error on Browse request with 
urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:ContentDirectory:1 CDS_Control 
(coherence/upnp/core/action.py:112)
WARN  soapNov 28 13:50:03  error requesting url 
'http://10.0.0.20:6544/CDS_Control' (coherence/upnp/core/soap_proxy.py:60)

-- 
Rhythmbox can't deal with UPnP media from Fritz!Box
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682347
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 413799] Re: [ubuntu karmic] Power History is completely wrong

2010-10-16 Thread ullix
see my comment at Bug #451557

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] Power History is completely wrong
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413799
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] Re: [ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?

2010-10-16 Thread ullix
compare with Bug #413799

I am now running Lucid on my netbook, and the history and stats as shown
by the gnome-power-manager do seem to be realistic.

However, I do note one logical glitch in the display of Time to empty:
when this time is, let's say, 2h, and the AC power is connected, the
Time to empty shows 0h (zero hours). If anything, this should be
infinity, though simply omitting a data point of zero might be more
adequate.

Likewise, when AC is connected and the removed, the Time to full is
shown as 0s (zero second). That would also have to be infinity (or again
omitted altogether).

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 580910] [NEW] evolution allows deletion of inbox

2010-05-15 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: evolution

I began using evolution for my email, and suddenly noticed that the inbox of 
one account had completely disappeared. Fortunately, all emails resurfaced in 
the inbox of a different, and supposedly unrelated account.
Upon further investigation I noticed that while the folders for 'junk' and 
'trash' are protected against deletion, every other folder can be deleted, 
including the Inbox! 

It cannot possibly be right that you are pulling the rug under the
inbox' feet by removing the only other folder besides trash and junk?

** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
evolution allows deletion of inbox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 560237] Re: Ubuntu upgrade to Lucid failed badly!

2010-04-16 Thread ullix
Sebastian,
testing a guest session for the presence of the session function on the panel, 
missing on my desktop,  would first require the presence of that session 
function on my desktop, which would render testing the guest session irrelevant 
:-(
Or is there a different way to login as guest?

-- 
Ubuntu upgrade to Lucid failed badly!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560237
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 560237] Re: Ubuntu upgrade to Lucid failed badly!

2010-04-15 Thread ullix
Sebastian, 
the indicator-session remained installed with version 0.2.7-0ubuntu3. I have 
now upgraded to 0.2.8-0ubuntu2. 

I believe this package is in charge of showing the
suspend/hibernate/shutdown as well as user change/logout options? It is
still not showing

-- 
Ubuntu upgrade to Lucid failed badly!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560237
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 560237] Re: Ubuntu upgrade to Lucid failed badly!

2010-04-15 Thread ullix
Michael,
I used iotop and found that I have 2 instances of kjournald running, which both 
are doing a lot(!) of disk access. I also saw rsyslogd -c4 which also does a 
lot of disk access. The latter probably was due to another failed upgrade part, 
namely mythtv is solidly broken by the upgrade. The mythbackend perpetually 
terminates and respawns, which may be creating much/most/all of this logging 
activity:
...
Apr 15 19:38:06 athlon--80gb init: mythtv-backend main process (6014) 
terminated with status 254
Apr 15 19:38:06 athlon--80gb init: mythtv-backend main process ended, respawning
Apr 15 19:38:11 athlon--80gb init: mythtv-backend main process (6020) 
terminated with status 254
Apr 15 19:38:11 athlon--80gb init: mythtv-backend main process ended, respawning
Apr 15 19:38:16 athlon--80gb init: mythtv-backend main process (6026) 
terminated with status 254
Apr 15 19:38:16 athlon--80gb init: mythtv-backend main process ended, respawning
Apr 15 19:38:21 athlon--80gb init: mythtv-backend main process (6037) 
terminated with status 254
Apr 15 19:38:21 athlon--80gb init: mythtv-backend main process ended, respawning
...
killing the mythbackend brought some peace

I still have these network outgoing bursts every 3 second. Is there
something like iotop for network ('nettop') to see which programs are
doing this?

-- 
Ubuntu upgrade to Lucid failed badly!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560237
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 559459] [NEW] [ubuntu lucid] evolution dialogs do not fit on netbook screens

2010-04-09 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: evolution

running post beta2 ubuntu lucid.
evolution has several configuration dialog boxes, which do not fit - even after 
maximizing - on a netbook screen of 1024x600, and do not offer vertikal 
scrolls. changing anything in the bottom parts becomes very tricky.

Options and tabs effected are e.g. Mail Preferences - General
(sreenshot attached) , Calendar and Tasks -General,

while e.g Mail Preferences - Junk exceeds the screen but already does
offer a vertcal scroll bar

** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[ubuntu lucid] evolution dialogs do not fit on netbook screens
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559459
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 559459] Re: [ubuntu lucid] dialogs do not fit on netbook screens

2010-04-09 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: screenshot of Evolution Preferences - Mail Preferences 
-General with window size maximized
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43578761/Screenshot-Evolution%20Preferences.png

** Summary changed:

- [ubuntu lucid] dialogs do not fit on netbook screens
+ [ubuntu lucid] evolution dialogs do not fit on netbook screens

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: evolution
  
  running post beta2 ubuntu lucid.
- evolution has several configuration dialog boxes, which do not fit - even 
after maximizing - on a netbook screen of 1024x600, and do not offer vertikal 
scrolls. changing anything in the bottom parts becomes very tricky. 
+ evolution has several configuration dialog boxes, which do not fit - even 
after maximizing - on a netbook screen of 1024x600, and do not offer vertikal 
scrolls. changing anything in the bottom parts becomes very tricky.
  
  Options and tabs effected are e.g. Mail Preferences - General
  (sreenshot attached) , Calendar and Tasks -General,
  
  while e.g Mail Preferences - Junk exceeds the screen but already does
  offer a vertcal scroll bar

-- 
[ubuntu lucid] evolution dialogs do not fit on netbook screens
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559459
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 559496] [NEW] [ubuntu lucid] evolution not adapted to netbook screens

2010-04-09 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: evolution

running ubuntu lucid post beta2 on netbook with screen size 1024x600

when replying to a message it is shown on the bottom of the window an
area for attachments. when clicking on the plus before 'Show Attachment
Bar' makes the whole window jump upwards so that the top is covered by
the top panel. But then clicking anywhere makes the window jump up and
down, and you can't hit any item on the screen, like in these catch-me-
if-you-can plays.

Screenshots attached

** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[ubuntu lucid] evolution not adapted to netbook screens
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559496
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 559496] Re: [ubuntu lucid] evolution not adapted to netbook screens

2010-04-09 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: screenshot of reply mail BEFORE clicking on the show 
attachment plus sign
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43581238/Screenshot-Re%3A%20%5BBug%20289239%5D%20Re%3A%20%5Bintrepid%20ubuntu%5D%20gnome-ppp%20lacks%20permissions-1.png

-- 
[ubuntu lucid] evolution not adapted to netbook screens
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559496
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 559496] Re: [ubuntu lucid] evolution not adapted to netbook screens

2010-04-09 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: Screenshot of reply mail AFTER clicking on Show 
Attachment + sign
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43581409/Screenshot-Re%3A%20%5BBug%20289239%5D%20Re%3A%20%5Bintrepid%20ubuntu%5D%20gnome-ppp%20lacks%20permissions.png

-- 
[ubuntu lucid] evolution not adapted to netbook screens
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559496
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 559496] Re: [ubuntu lucid] evolution not adapted to netbook screens

2010-04-09 Thread ullix
I noticed that on the AFTER screenshot the bottom of the top panel is
visible, although the screenshot was taken with 'Alt Print', so only the
window, excluding the panel, should have been in the screenshot

-- 
[ubuntu lucid] evolution not adapted to netbook screens
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559496
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 554686] [NEW] [ubuntu lucid] Disk Utility not usable on netbook

2010-04-03 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-disk-utility

Trying the Disk utility 2.30.1 results in some catch-me-if-you-can game
as the window is jumping away when I attempt to click some buttons.

running latest ubuntu lucid desktop version on netbook Acer Aspire One
A110L (8GB SSD). Screen size is 1024x600.

Starting Disk Utility from System - Administration opens a the Disk
Utility window filling approx 80% of the screen width and 100% of the
space between top and bottom panel, i.e. the complete program window is
shown. Clicking on my hard drive in the left panel extends the screen
horizontally and vertically. The bottom two rows of buttons are now
invisible even when the bottom panel is removed. (window can be moved
with Alt-Left mouse)

Maximizing the window only extends the window to full width, but
vertically it still does not show the bottom rows. But when I now click
anywhere on the window, the window jumps up by approx 100-150 pixels, on
the next click down. The mouse clicks, though, go into dead space, or
land on a completely different button. Apparently the mouse-click-
location is interpreted after the jump of the screen.

** Affects: gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[ubuntu lucid] Disk Utility not usable on netbook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554686
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] apport-collect data

2010-02-04 Thread ullix
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5)
Package: gnome-power-manager 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.3
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-18.55-generic
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-18-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin mythtv netdev plugdev sambashare
XsessionErrors:
 (gnome-settings-daemon:1626): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion 
`src != NULL' failed
 (gnome-settings-daemon:1626): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion 
`src != NULL' failed
 (nautilus:1722): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion 
`preferences_is_initialized ()' failed
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1743): GLib-CRITICAL **: 
g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed
 (thunderbird-bin:4190): GLib-WARNING **: g_set_prgname() called multiple times

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] Dependencies.txt

2010-02-04 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38758646/Dependencies.txt

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] DevkitPower.txt

2010-02-04 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: DevkitPower.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38758647/DevkitPower.txt

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] GConfNonDefault.txt

2010-02-04 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38758653/GConfNonDefault.txt

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] gnome-power-bugreport.txt

2010-02-04 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: gnome-power-bugreport.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38758654/gnome-power-bugreport.txt

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] Re: [ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?

2010-02-04 Thread ullix
If I am not mistaken then the above apport-collect data say that the
charge rate is 0W, not 720W. (That is closer to the real 10W, but still
not satisfactory ;-)) . I therefore checked the power history and saw no
power data collected for the last week, although this computer was
continuously on for a few days. I then clicked a few tabs and graphing
options on the Power Statistics history and voila, the 720W is back!

I do the apport-collect again right now, and expect it to show 720W
charging:

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] apport-collect data

2010-02-04 Thread ullix
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5)
Package: gnome-power-manager 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.3
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-18.55-generic
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-18-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin mythtv netdev plugdev sambashare
XsessionErrors:
 (gnome-settings-daemon:1626): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion 
`src != NULL' failed
 (gnome-settings-daemon:1626): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion 
`src != NULL' failed
 (nautilus:1722): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion 
`preferences_is_initialized ()' failed
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1743): GLib-CRITICAL **: 
g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed
 (thunderbird-bin:4190): GLib-WARNING **: g_set_prgname() called multiple times

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] Dependencies.txt

2010-02-04 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38759493/Dependencies.txt

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] DevkitPower.txt

2010-02-04 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: DevkitPower.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38759495/DevkitPower.txt

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] GConfNonDefault.txt

2010-02-04 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38759506/GConfNonDefault.txt

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] gnome-power-bugreport.txt

2010-02-04 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: gnome-power-bugreport.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38759507/gnome-power-bugreport.txt

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] Re: [ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?

2010-02-04 Thread ullix
... and back to 720W we are!

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 460565] apport-collect data

2010-02-04 Thread ullix
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5)
Package: gnome-power-manager 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.3
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-18.55-generic
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-18-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin mythtv netdev plugdev sambashare

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] gnome-power-manager ignores its settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460565
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 460565] Dependencies.txt

2010-02-04 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38762611/Dependencies.txt

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] gnome-power-manager ignores its settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460565
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 460565] DevkitPower.txt

2010-02-04 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: DevkitPower.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38762612/DevkitPower.txt

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] gnome-power-manager ignores its settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460565
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 460565] GConfNonDefault.txt

2010-02-04 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38762613/GConfNonDefault.txt

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] gnome-power-manager ignores its settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460565
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 460565] XsessionErrors.txt

2010-02-04 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38762614/XsessionErrors.txt

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] gnome-power-manager ignores its settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460565
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 460565] gnome-power-bugreport.txt

2010-02-04 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: gnome-power-bugreport.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38762615/gnome-power-bugreport.txt

** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

** Tags added: apport-collected

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] gnome-power-manager ignores its settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460565
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 350826] Re: Rhythmbox no longer showing UPnP devices

2010-02-04 Thread ullix
rhythmbox still not showing upnp devices, neither on up-to-date karmic,
nor on intrepid

-- 
Rhythmbox no longer showing UPnP devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350826
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 486282] Re: [ubuntu karmic] epiphany extensions have wrong dependencies

2009-11-21 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: synaptic screenshot showing the depencies issue
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35917817/Screenshot-Synaptic%20Package%20Manager%20.png

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] epiphany extensions have wrong dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486282
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 486282] [NEW] [ubuntu karmic] epiphany extensions have wrong dependencies

2009-11-21 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: epiphany-browser

the epiphany-extensions-more (for the web browser) cannot be installed
because of wrong dependencies, see attached screenshot, forcing 2.27
while 2.28 is installed

** Affects: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] epiphany extensions have wrong dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486282
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 453377] Re: [ubuntu karmic] mythtv-frontend does not prevent display being put to sleep during tv watching

2009-10-20 Thread ullix
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 428884 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428884

with all updates from uo to this evening (Oct 20, 2009):

nothing is fixed. with the gnome-power-manager set to put the display to
sleep in 1 min, nothing happens at this time, wjhile the display dims
off slowly at 5 min, which is not set, neither for battery nor for AC.

mythtv is also not switched off at 1min (not sruprising given above) I
can't determine if it is switched off at 5min, because it is always
chrashing between 2 and 5min.

Killing gnome-screensaver results in the display switched fast-off at
1min. mythtv sometimes crashes at 2min, sometimes goes up to +8min.

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] mythtv-frontend does not prevent display being put to sleep 
during tv watching
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453377
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 453377] Re: [ubuntu karmic] mythtv-frontend does not prevent display being put to sleep during tv watching

2009-10-18 Thread ullix
running on battery; looks like it's poking every 50 seconds?

$ mythfrontend -v important,general,playback | grep save
2009-10-18 19:06:18.074 ScreenSaverX11Private: Gnome screen saver support 
enabled
ALSA lib control.c:909:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) Invalid CTL /dev/mixer
2009-10-18 19:07:22.240 ScreenSaverX11Private: Calling 
gnome-screensaver-command --poke
2009-10-18 19:08:12.251 ScreenSaverX11Private: Calling 
gnome-screensaver-command --poke
2009-10-18 19:09:02.254 ScreenSaverX11Private: Calling 
gnome-screensaver-command --poke
2009-10-18 19:09:52.237 ScreenSaverX11Private: Calling 
gnome-screensaver-command --poke

after this mythtv crashed again

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] mythtv-frontend does not prevent display being put to sleep 
during tv watching
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453377
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] [NEW] [ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?

2009-10-14 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager

The gnome-power-manager (2.28.0) has multiple problems on my netbook, but the 
most obvious nonsense is to report being charged at 720 Watts of my netbook 
AcerAspireOne 110L .
attached screenshots show graph type 'Rate'
cold boot on battery:  after a cold boot. Reported Power of about 10+Watt seems 
reasonable.

plug-in/plug-out: at about 5.8min the netbook was plugged-in to power.
The power jumps to 720Watt, which is obvious nonsense. At 2min the
netbook was unplugged, and runs again on battery. After some blank
period the graph continuous at about 10W.

** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] Re: [ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?

2009-10-14 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: cold boot on battery
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33673592/Screenshot-Power%20Statistics.png

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 451557] Re: [ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?

2009-10-14 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: plug-in/plug-out
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33673600/Screenshot-Power%20Statistics-1.png

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] 720Watt netbooks?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 425121] [NEW] [ubuntu karmic] nonsense reports of gnome-power-manager

2009-09-06 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager

on my little netbook acer aspire one A110L (8.9 screen, 8GB SSD) the
gnome power manager is consistent in giving wrong information. Attached
only one example: selecting Power HISTORY from right-clicking on the
battery icon in the panel provides a window labelled Power STATISTICS.
And in the left column the AC Adapter is highlighted, while in the
right column the Statistics (or history) is shown for the Laptop
battery.

And the power on my tiny netbok clearly is not 720W! This jump-up from
~10W (sounds about right) to 720W occured when I plugged in the AC power
supply.

Hower, this gnome-power-manager has more difficulties. Sometimes after
removing the AC supply the gpm contiues to show being on AC supply.
Sometimes, on battery,  it does not update and continues to show 100%
chsarge up to the point of the netbook switching off for lack of juice.
Suspending seems to confuse gpm also. And so on.

** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] nonsense reports of gnome-power-manager
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425121
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 425121] Re: [ubuntu karmic] nonsense reports of gnome-power-manager

2009-09-06 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: screenshot from gnome-power-manager's Power History
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31386917/Screenshot-1.png

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] nonsense reports of gnome-power-manager
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425121
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 425121] Re: [ubuntu karmic] nonsense reports of gnome-power-manager

2009-09-06 Thread ullix
just an additional curiosity: No data to display reported by gpg,
while the netbook had been running contiuously since the last picture
attaches (opened, and NOT in suspend) and top reports 7:38h runtime

** Attachment added: no data to display screenshot
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31392625/Screenshot.png

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] nonsense reports of gnome-power-manager
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425121
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 350826] Re: [jaunty] Rhythmbox no longer showing UPnP devices

2009-08-15 Thread ullix
this issue continues to exist in karmic alpha4. Furthermore, it appears
that the 'python-coherence' package for the framework is either missing
completely or is being renamed to 'coherence'. If so then neither
rhythmbox nor totem knows about this, as the 'DLNA/UPnP sharing and
control' plugin cannot be activated in neither of the two.

Using the tools from the gupnp-tools package I can see the various upnp
devices on my net.

** Summary changed:

- [jaunty] Rhythmbox no longer showing UPnP devices
+ [jaunty ... karmic] Rhythmbox no longer showing UPnP devices

-- 
[jaunty ... karmic] Rhythmbox no longer showing UPnP devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350826
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 413799] [NEW] [ubutu karmic] Power History is completely wrong

2009-08-14 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager

700 Watts in my little netbook - that's why it is so hot! The
screenshot, see attachement, shows a power history graph of some 700 W
for my Acer Aspire One netbook, which consumes something like 10Watt.
Some previous versions of the power manager did show this correctly, but
now it is way off.

Also, upon opening Power History the left side shows that the AC Adapter
is selected, but the right side provides battery information. Only after
clicking again on AC Adapter is the AC information shown

** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[ubutu karmic] Power History is completely wrong
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413799
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 413799] Re: [ubutu karmic] Power History is completely wrong

2009-08-14 Thread ullix

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager
  
- 700 Watts in my little netbook - that's why it is so hot!
+ 700 Watts in my little netbook - that's why it is so hot! The
+ screenshot, see attachement, shows a power history graph of some 700 W
+ for my Acer Aspire One netbook, which consumes something like 10Watt.
+ Some previous versions of the power manager did show this correctly, but
+ now it is way off.
+ 
+ Also, upon opening Power History the left side shows that the AC Adapter
+ is selected, but the right side provides battery information. Only after
+ clicking again on AC Adapter is the AC information shown

** Attachment added: power history of netbook at 700W!
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30338235/Screenshot-Power%20Statistics.png

-- 
[ubutu karmic] Power History is completely wrong
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413799
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 400290] Re: crashes upon attempting to ssh-connect

2009-07-17 Thread ullix
Sebastien,
I have no idea what ubuntuone is, but I searched under synaptics and found 4 
files being installed and having ubuntuone in their name (ubuntuone-client, 
ubunutone-client-gnome, and 2 files python-ubuntuone-xxx). I removed them and 
tried nautilus entering location ssh://xxx : it still crashed. I did a cold 
reboot, and no crashes anymore! I can do ssh, click on trash, and click on 
computer, and all comes up as it shoudl, no crashes.

-- 
crashes upon attempting to ssh-connect
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 400290] [NEW] [ubuntu karmic] nautilus crashes upon attempting to ssh-connect

2009-07-16 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: nautilus

running ubuntu karmic on netbook Acer Aspire One 110L.

when attempting to connect to a second computer via ssh by entering e.g.
ssh://10.0.0.30 into the location line of nautilus,  nautilus crashes.
upon restarting nautilus it shows the location as mounted (sftp 0n
10.0.0.30 in the Places column). Clicking on this line also crashes
nautilus.

ssh-ing on the command line works.

This occured only after a reboot following today's updates. After all
updates were done - but before the reboot - I could ssh to the other
computer via nautilus. The error persists after additional cold reboots.

uname -a
Linux aa1sd 2.6.31-3-generic #19-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jul 14 16:04:41 UTC 2009 i686 
GNU/Linux

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[ubuntu karmic] nautilus crashes upon attempting to ssh-connect
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 400290] Re: crashes upon attempting to ssh-connect

2009-07-16 Thread ullix
Well, I could do this: after enabling  apport I replicated the error,
and reported under bug #400319. This failure also produced an error in
usplash, which is reported as bug #400322.

I can't do backtracing.

In case it helps: when I mounted the external folder as nfs share (as
opposed to access it via ssh) I could read it with nautilus without any
problem.

-- 
crashes upon attempting to ssh-connect
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400290
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 377576] Re: [karmic] Power History windows too big for netbook screen

2009-07-16 Thread ullix
I can confirm that the size issue is fixed, but a lot of other issues
were introduced. Two of them are shown in the attached screenshots: The
AC adaptor is shown as selected (doesn't show in thre screenshot
-another bug?) on the left side, but battery details are shown on the
right side. And a battery power rate of 730W seems a bit high for my
netbook!

** Attachment added: AC adaptor highlighted as selected, but battery details 
are shown
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29150992/Screenshot-Power%20Statistics.png

-- 
[karmic] Power History windows too big for netbook screen
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377576
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 377576] Re: [karmic] Power History windows too big for netbook screen

2009-07-16 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: 730 W in a netbook???
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29151028/Screenshot-Power%20Statistics-1.png

-- 
[karmic] Power History windows too big for netbook screen
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377576
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 377576] [NEW] [ubuntu karmic]Power History windows too big for netbook screen

2009-05-17 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager

Clicking on Power History under the gnome-power-manager icon in the
panel, and then clicking on laptop battery extends the window beyond the
right end of the screen (although there is still space on the left) and
extends it bottom end beyond the bottom end of the screen. The vertical
size is too big for a 1024x600 netbook screen, like on my acer aspire
one 110l.

** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[ubuntu karmic]Power History windows too big for netbook screen
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377576
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 377576] Re: [ubuntu karmic]Power History windows too big for netbook screen

2009-05-17 Thread ullix

** Attachment added: after ckicking on 'Laptop Battery' in 'Power History'
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26867638/Screenshot.png

-- 
[ubuntu karmic]Power History windows too big for netbook screen
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377576
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 350826] [NEW] [jaunty] Rhythmbox no longer showing UPnP devices

2009-03-29 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: rhythmbox

Rhythmbox is no longer showing UPnP on the local net. It was working on
this system for several alpha versions but now at beta state (but
possibly happening before), it no longer shows them. Python-coherence is
installed, and reinstalling did not help.

uname -a
Linux atom330 2.6.28-11-generic #38-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 27 09:00:52 UTC 2009 
i686 GNU/Linux

** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[jaunty] Rhythmbox no longer showing UPnP devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350826
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 350826] Re: [jaunty] Rhythmbox no longer showing UPnP devices

2009-03-29 Thread ullix
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: rhythmbox
  
  Rhythmbox is no longer showing UPnP on the local net. It was working on
  this system for several alpha versions but now at beta state (but
  possibly happening before), it no longer shows them. Python-coherence is
  installed, and reinstalling did not help.
  
  uname -a
  Linux atom330 2.6.28-11-generic #38-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 27 09:00:52 UTC 2009 
i686 GNU/Linux
+ 
+ 
+ Update:
+ 
+ Rhythmbox does find UPnP devices properly when booting an older status
+ of jaunty from a USB disk. Uname for this older install is:
+ 
+ uname -a
+ Linux icy810 2.6.28-9-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 11 15:43:58 UTC 2009 
i686 GNU/Linux

-- 
[jaunty] Rhythmbox no longer showing UPnP devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350826
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 303778] Re: [ubuntu intrepid] Rhythm box faulty on netbook screens

2008-12-01 Thread ullix
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 138845 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138845

Pedro, I believe you are mistaken in your interpretation of the cause
for the bug. This jumping behaviour is seen in a number of programs, and
clearly related to the screen height of only 600pixel, as is typical for
netbooks. I think there is some hardcoding about the expected screen
height, which results in this behaviour.

I have reported this same faulty behaviour for other programs already,
as e.g. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpaint/+bug/300427,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghex/+bug/300467,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcompris/+bug/300779,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tuxpaint/+bug/300780,

Having a multimedia program acting incorrectly particularly on a
netbook, where you can have music-on-the-go is unfortunate.

-- 
[ubuntu intrepid] Rhythm box faulty on netbook screens
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303778
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 303778] [NEW] [ubuntu intrepid] Rhythm box faulty on netbook screens

2008-11-30 Thread ullix
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: rhythmbox

when rhythm box is run on a netbook (acer aspire one) with screen size
1024x600, and the cover window on the lower left end of the program is
enlarged beyond a certain size, then the program's bottom end extends to
below the lower screen end. When any spot in the programwindow is then
clicked, the program window jumps up and down. It then is difficult if
not impossible to select any song, button or menu entry.

** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[ubuntu intrepid] Rhythm box faulty on netbook screens
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303778
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 187383] Re: System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU

2008-11-11 Thread ullix
I have a similar issue with a Ubuntu Intrepid install on an Acer Aspire
One netbook, where gnome-system-monitor plus Xorg consume 60+% CPU,
shown both by top and g-s-m.

Running top in maximized gnome-terminal after cold start. CPU usage from 
Xorg:1-3%, total: 3-5%
Starting g-s-m and hiding behind the maximized terminal window: CPU usage 
slowly creeps up, becoming stable at CPU usage as reported by top of Xorg:~35% 
and g-s-m:~35%. All other processes combined 3%. Load average by top after 
~10min is 0.73/0.78/0.56. Switching to the g-s-m window shows CPU1 and CPU2 
each at 30-40%.

uname -a: Linux aa1 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP Tue Nov 4 19:33:20 UTC 2008
i686 GNU/Linux

and the very same after upgrade, now:
uname -a: Linux aa1 2.6.27-8-generic #1 SMP Thu Nov 6 17:33:54 UTC 2008 i686 
GNU/Linux

-- 
System monitor causes Xorg to consume 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187383
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 292992] Re: GNOME-system-monitor max's out the CPU, sometimes up to 100%

2008-11-09 Thread ullix
I have a similar issue with a Ubuntu Intrepid install on an Acer Aspire
One netbook, where gnome-system-monitor plus Xorg consume 60+% CPU,
shown both by top and g-s-m.

Running top in maximized gnome-terminal after cold start. CPU usage from 
Xorg:1-3%, total:  3-5%
Starting g-s-m and hiding behind the maximized terminal window: CPU usage 
slowly creeps up, becoming stable at CPU usage as reported by top of Xorg:~35% 
and g-s-m:~35%. All other processes combined 3%. Load average by top after 
~10min is 0.73/0.78/0.56.  Switching to the g-s-m window shows CPU1 and CPU2 
each at 30-40%.


uname -a:  Linux aa1 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP Tue Nov 4 19:33:20 UTC 2008 i686 
GNU/Linux

-- 
GNOME-system-monitor max's out the CPU, sometimes up to 100%
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292992
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 54790] Re: Can not establish internet connection by using Modem Monitor applet

2008-11-02 Thread ullix
I have a fresh install of ubuntu intrepid and seem to have the same
problem with the monitor modem applet. I use it with the remix
interface.

These are the applet responses: (my language setting is German)
1) resting the mouse pointer over it, it shows (in English): Could not get 
connection time
2)left clicking on it: no response at all
3)right clicking on it:
   - Activate and Deactivate are greyed out and cannot be selected
   - clicking properties: Das Programm zum Einstellen der Netzwerkverbindungen 
konnte nicht gestartet werden. Bitte 
  überprüfen Sie, dass es im richtigen Pfad installiert ist und das es die 
notwendigen Zugriffsrechte besitzt
 (approx: the program to set network connections cannot be started. Please 
check the it is installed in the proper path   
 and you have necessary access permissions)
Network connections on this computer via wired and wireless work well.

Also, using Gnome PPP I can dial out via the modem (USB modem zoom 3095)
and can make a connection (doesn't help much, though, because connection
fails immediately, which I had reported elsewhere).

Yes, there are still places, where you need a modem, please help!

-- 
Can not establish internet connection by using Modem Monitor applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-applets in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs