[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-09-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: evolution
   Importance: Unknown = Medium

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-07-02 Thread Viktor Ferenczi
Please see here:
http://www.webupd8.org/2010/06/install-evolution-230-in-ubuntu-1004.html

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-07-02 Thread Viktor Ferenczi
Tried this and seemed to work. But I had to update a few packages
manually in Synaptic. You can find them by searching for packages marked
with a gray status icon with an exclamation mark on it.

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-05-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package evolution - 2.30.1.2-1ubuntu1

---
evolution (2.30.1.2-1ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low

  * Merge from debian experimental:
+ debian/control:
  - add Vcs-Bzr tag
  - don't build depends on pilot-link it's not required
  - don't use po-debconf there either
  - build-depends on libpst, python and shared-mime-info
  - set gnome-pilot-conduits as suggests
  - don't split documentation since it goes to langpacks
  - evolution replaces evolution-plugins ( 2.22.2-1)
since the bogofilter plugin has been moved there
  - evolution-plugins-experimental replaces evolution-plugins ( 2.27)
  - updated descriptions to reflect binary installs
  - remove libgtkimageview-dev build-dep: not in main, seems crashy right
now
+ debian/docs:
  - renamed evolution-common.docs
+ debian/evolution-2.2.desktop:
  - compatibility .desktop for users upgrading
+ debian/evolution.gconf-defaults:
  - don't display unstable warning on startup (Ubuntu: #91799)
+ debian/evolution.install:
  - install the autostart and compatibility desktop entries
  - install webdav and python but not hula and print-message there
+ debian/evolution-mail.desktop:
  - don't reapply this ubuntu change and use only one menu entry
+ debian/evolution-alarm-notify.desktop,
  debian/evolution-alarm-notify.desktop.in,
  #debian/patches/64_translate_autostart_strings.patch: #
  - autostart desktop file to start evolution-alarm-notify with the session,
translate the entry
+ debian/evolution-dev.install:
  - detail the .so to install
+ debian/evolution-plugins.install,
  debian/evolution-plugins-experimental.install:
  - install the .so in binaries corresponding to the upstream options
+ debian/patches/01_dont-ship-evo-mail-notifier.png.patch:
  - don't ship that change that debian added without reason
+ debian/evolution.preinst, debian/evolution.templates:
  - don't display debconf template on upgrade
+ debian/patches/03_lpi.patch:
  - launchpad-integration patch
+ debian/patches/62_no_upstream_email_notification_by_default.patch:
  - don't enable the notification icon by default since the message 
indicator
is running
+ debian/patches/10_desktop_shortcuts.patch
  - Adds desktop shortcuts for the messaging menu.
+ debian/rules:
  - don't use -Bsymbolic-functions to workaround memos crashing
  - don't use debconf translation there
  - use --disable-scrollkeeper --enable-python configure option
  - use --disable-inline-plugin: dep not in main, seems crashy right now
+ debian/patches/90_autoconf.patch:
  - refresh autotool

evolution (2.30.1.2-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream bugfix release.
  * debian/patches:
- 03_fix-face-plugin-linking dropped, included upstream.

evolution (2.30.1.1-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream bugfix release. (LP: #154752)
  * debian/patches:
- 03_fix-face-plugin-linking, fix ftbfs with face plugin.
  * debian/control:
- bump (build-)deps to gtkhtml/eds 2.30.1.

evolution (2.30.0.1-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release.
  * debian/watch updated to track stable releases.
  * debian/control:
- bump eds and gtkhtml build-deps to 2.30.
  * debian/evolution-mail.desktop: update components version to 2.30.
  * debian/lintian/evolution-common:
- add an override for evolution-settings command not being in the package.
  * debian/lintian:
- evolution-plugins dropped, useless now.
- evolution-plugins-experimental dropped as well.
  * debian/evolution-plugins-experimental.install,
  debian/evolution-plugins.install: don't install lintian overrides.

evolution (2.29.92.1-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release candidate.
  * debian/copyright updated.

evolution (2.29.92-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release candidate. (LP: #433674, #198392)
  * debian/control:
- bump build-deps on eds and gtkhtml.
  * debian/rules:
- remove deprecated --enable-nntp arg to configure.

evolution (2.29.91-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release candidate. (LP: #478976, #409795,
  * debian/control:
- bump build-deps on eds and gtkhtml.

evolution (2.29.90-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release candidate.
  * debian/control:
- bump build-deps on eds et gtkhtml.
- add build-dep on libunique-dev.
- bump standards version to 3.8.4.

evolution (2.29.6-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream development release.
  * debian/control:
- bump eds and gtkhtml versions to 2.29.6.
  * debian/rules:
- disable nm on non Linux builds, fix FTBFS on kFreeBSD.closes: #566928
  * debian/patches
- 02_fix-gtkdoc dropped.

evolution (2.29.5-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream development release. (LP: #471825)
  * debian/control:
- drop 

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-05-18 Thread Guillaume Lecanu
Thanks !
When can we get the version 2.30.1.2-1ubuntu1 on Lucid Lynx ?

The last one seems to be evolution_2.28.3-0ubuntu9 on
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/e/evolution/

Best Regards,

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-27 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: evolution
   Status: Unknown = Fix Released

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-13 Thread Guillaume Lecanu
@Sebastien Bacher:
Of course, I have tested all sensible things after upgrading the first computer 
(kernel, drivers, printer, scanners, fax, voip, etc). But I haven't tested all 
options of all applications, because, since Warty, I never see any regression 
bug in applications of Ubuntu.

I know you do your best, and I know it's not a simple task, we sincerely
appreciate all your works, I don't blam you at all.

I have only suggested an appreciate feature to prevent theses kind of
problem.

This bug was reported in August 2009, before the final release of Karmic Koala 
(November 2009).
May be it's possible while the dist-upgrading, to look in launchpad if there is 
regression bugs reported, and in this case to show the subject / links and to 
ask if we want to upgrade the package.

When I was on debian (before that Ubuntu exists), I remember the apt
dist-upgrade command do this automatically for all critical bugs. This
wasn't directly integrated in apt command, this was a plugin or
another package added, but I don't remember the name. May be it's
possible to do something similar, at least for the regression bugs and
critical bugs ?

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-13 Thread Sebastien Bacher
it seems something that could be handled better indeed

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
the bug has been fixed upstream now, the change doesn't work on the
lucid version of Ubuntu though so it will probably not be fixed in lucid
unless somebody work on doing a similar change on the current version

** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Committed

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Guillaume Lecanu
@Sebastien Bacher:
Is it possible to have a ppa repository in this case ?

For us, it's a big problem in our company, we have upgraded all
computers desktop from Jaunty to Karmic this morning. Now this make a
lots of problems for all our employees, they have to choose one of our
ten identities each time ...

Or do you have a solution to get an older version like 2.26 inside
Karmic Koala ?

Thanks for your time and your help.

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
 Is it possible to have a ppa repository in this case ?

what would you use in the ppa there? the new version is not in lucid
because it's a rewritte with quite some technologies changes so it would
be a stability issue and not apply easily on karmic. if the logic used
to work in jaunty it should be possible to write a change for 2.28 but
it requires somebody having the issue and understanding the change and
what needs to be done there

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Guillaume Lecanu
@Sebastien Bacher:

Ok, I understood. 
There is a way to permit to go back in version 2.26 into Karmic, please ?

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
downgrading should be working but I didn't try, is selecting the email
you want to use so much of an issue? in which cases is it buggy exactly?

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Guillaume Lecanu
For us it's a very big problem because we have a lots of identities and
we need to reply multiples hundreds of emails every day.

Our administration staff manage multiples companies (partners in the
same office) for multiples services (commercial, supports, recruitments
etc), with one centralized IMAP account. Each company or service is
stored in different folders.

Since many years, the good identity was directly preselected when we
click on the reply button (by looking the To field of the message).
Since the Karmic upgrade this morning, Evolution is now in 2.28, and
there is no detection of the identity, it's directly the first identity
created in Evolution.

Now, our staff need to select manually the identity, this take more time
but it's not the worst. Imagine if someone forget to change the
identity. A message could be badly replied under the wrong company or
from the wrong service.

We need solve urgently this problem, by downgrading to 2.26. Can you
explain me how to go back in 2.26 please, or give me a simple link on
the web if there is to make this downgrade ?

Thanks a lots !

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
installing 2.26 on karmic will probably reveal to be non-trivial since
it would require to downgrade the evolution-data-server stack too, I've
no easy reply for your right now, the easiest might be to look at fixing
the issue in 2.28

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Guillaume Lecanu
Ok... Thanks for your help Sebastien.

We prefer Evolution, but we will uses Mozilla Thunderbird while the fix
come in Ubuntu Karmic (If this come a day in Karmic..).

The bug seems fixed in Fedora 13 since at least one month :
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588833


Generally, we wait many months after a new version of Ubuntu to limit the risks 
(we have upgraded to Karmic this morning, out since 5 or 6 months now).

An appreciate feature in Ubuntu should be to ask the user before
upgrading a package if there is regression bugs inside the product.
This could prevent of theses kind of situation.

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
It could be a good idea to upgrade one box to test that everything you
need is still working next time, we try as best to not break things
between versions but we don't write all the softwares we distribute and
bugs happen. The issue you raised has not been really flagged as a
stopper until now likely because most users have one account or switch
between ids not as often as you do.

The bug has been fixed in fedora because they use the new version which
has all the technologies changes for GNOME3, the version had lot of code
changes and low testing until now, Ubuntu didn't trust it to be a good
choice to be ship an earlier unstable version in a lts now, it will be
available next cycle and it would not be surprising to see a ppa or
backports for it too...

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2009-10-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Also affects: evolution via
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597987
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2009-10-10 Thread oleksiy
Yes, did it just now, sorry for delay:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597987

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #597987
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597987

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2009-10-02 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
any news about this ? did you sent the bug upstream? may you tell us the
bug number there? Thanks.

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2009-08-25 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
Thanks for your report, that's something to send directly upstream at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org by someone having the issue, for forwarding
instructions please read http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/GNOME,
Thanks in advance.

** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Low

** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)

-- 
evolution mail aliases regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs