[Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2021-10-13 Thread Steve Langasek
The Precise Pangolin has reached end of life, so this bug will not be
fixed for that release

** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922968

Title:
  shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/922968/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-07-23 Thread Ara Pulido
Not critical enough to get in the OEM priority queue

** Changed in: oem-priority
   Status: Confirmed = Invalid

** Changed in: oem-priority/precise
   Status: Confirmed = Invalid

** Changed in: oem-priority
   Status: Invalid = Won't Fix

** Changed in: oem-priority/precise
   Status: Invalid = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922968

Title:
  shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/922968/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-06-18 Thread James M. Leddy
Okay, thank you for that information.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922968

Title:
  shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/922968/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-06-17 Thread James M. Leddy
Hi Ryan,

Can the same fix be applied to the equivalent packages in precise? If
so, I will be requesting that we SRU these changes once upstream agrees
to them.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922968

Title:
  shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/922968/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-06-17 Thread Ryan Lortie
hi James,

Unfortunately we handle suspend in a much more ad-hoc way on precise.
There is no logind or systemd-shim through which all suspend requests
are handled.  These changes are therefore not really possible to
backport.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922968

Title:
  shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/922968/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-06-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922968

Title:
  shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/922968/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-06-04 Thread Ryan Lortie
We fixed this issue in saucy by moving responsibility for handling
suspend into systemd-shim and adding a check there to ignore suspend
requests that come in during a very small window after waking up.  From
personal reports, this has solved the issue for everyone who has tried
it.

I'm not totally happy with the solution -- I would prefer if we had one
based on the timestamps of the source of the suspend (ie: clicking a
menu item with the mouse, lid-close events, etc) and were able to
compare that with the time of the suspend itself.  This requires some
changes to logind, though.  This has been discussed with upstream and
we're waiting.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922968

Title:
  shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/922968/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-03-25 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Ryan agreed to talk to upstream/have a look to the issue, reassigning to
him

** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Precise)
 Assignee: Canonical Desktop Team (canonical-desktop-team) = Ryan Lortie 
(desrt)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922968

Title:
  shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/922968/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 922968] Re: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

2013-03-22 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Could somebody upstream the GNOME bug against gnome-settings-daemon:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gnome-settings-daemon ?

Unassigning the desktop team, we don't have currently anyone with spare
cycles to look at that, and it seems really a minor issue: it's not easy
to trigger the second suspend before the first one kicks in, and there
is no breakage, just an annoyance that you need to resume a second time

If that's a real issue for oems please ping me to discuss it

** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Canonical Desktop Team (canonical-desktop-team) = (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922968

Title:
  shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/922968/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs