[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1719122] [NEW] Flash plugin ignores pulse audio

2017-09-23 Thread Alf Haakon Lund
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu Studio 16.04 LTS. Firefox 55.0.2, all other software recently
updated through Software Updater.

Internal soundcard set to 'off' in pulse audio, using Focusrite Scarlett
2i4 USB. Playing audio from a website with flash player.

Expected: Audio output through pulse audio and Focusrite, just like any
other sound from firefox or other sources do.

What happens: Firefox / flash ignores pulse audio and outputs sound
directly to internal soundcard. The audio stream does not show in
pavucontrol. Volume control is possible only from the flash player.

This error is also reported at
https://readlist.com/lists/lists.mozilla.org/support-
firefox/34/174788.html

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: firefox 55.0.2+build1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-33.37~16.04.1-lowlatency 4.10.17
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-33-lowlatency x86_64
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
BuildID: 20170816210634
Channel: Unavailable
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Sat Sep 23 20:37:57 2017
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
Extensions: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IfupdownConfig:
 # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
 auto lo
 iface lo inet loopback
IncompatibleExtensions: Unavailable (corrupt or non-existant compatibility.ini 
or extensions.sqlite)
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-03-06 (201 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 16.04.2 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170215)
IpRoute:
 default via 192.168.0.1 dev wlp2s0  proto static  metric 600 
 169.254.0.0/16 dev wlp2s0  scope link  metric 1000 
 192.168.0.0/24 dev wlp2s0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.0.76  metric 
600
Locales: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
MostRecentCrashID: bp-4ab78069-9aeb-4ec5-a0f2-992b52150208
Plugins: Shockwave Flash - /usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so
PrefSources: prefs.js
Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=55.0.2/20170816210634 (In use)
RunningIncompatibleAddons: False
SourcePackage: firefox
SubmittedCrashIDs:
 bp-4ab78069-9aeb-4ec5-a0f2-992b52150208
 bp-b5d7190f-3788-482d-bbe3-ed9cf2140906
 bp-6810ec1c-2408-434e-9aa9-e56e72140830
Themes: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 03/03/2012
dmi.bios.vendor: TOSHIBA
dmi.bios.version: 1.10
dmi.board.asset.tag: *
dmi.board.name: QFKAA
dmi.board.vendor: TOSHIBA
dmi.board.version: 1.00
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: *
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: TOSHIBA
dmi.chassis.version: *
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnTOSHIBA:bvr1.10:bd03/03/2012:svnTOSHIBA:pnSATELLITEP850:pvrPSPKAE-00E001N5:rvnTOSHIBA:rnQFKAA:rvr1.00:cvnTOSHIBA:ct10:cvr*:
dmi.product.name: SATELLITE P850
dmi.product.version: PSPKAE-00E001N5
dmi.sys.vendor: TOSHIBA

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1719122

Title:
  Flash plugin ignores pulse audio

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu Studio 16.04 LTS. Firefox 55.0.2, all other software recently
  updated through Software Updater.

  Internal soundcard set to 'off' in pulse audio, using Focusrite
  Scarlett 2i4 USB. Playing audio from a website with flash player.

  Expected: Audio output through pulse audio and Focusrite, just like
  any other sound from firefox or other sources do.

  What happens: Firefox / flash ignores pulse audio and outputs sound
  directly to internal soundcard. The audio stream does not show in
  pavucontrol. Volume control is possible only from the flash player.

  This error is also reported at
  https://readlist.com/lists/lists.mozilla.org/support-
  firefox/34/174788.html

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: firefox 55.0.2+build1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-33.37~16.04.1-lowlatency 4.10.17
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-33-lowlatency x86_64
  AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
  Architecture: amd64
  BuildID: 20170816210634
  Channel: Unavailable
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Sat Sep 23 20:37:57 2017
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  Extensions: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
  ForcedLayersAccel: False
  IfupdownConfig:
   # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
   auto lo
   iface lo inet loopback
  IncompatibleExtensions: Unavailable (corrupt or non-existant 
compatibility.ini or extensions.sqlite)
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-03-06 (201 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 16.04.2 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170215)
  IpRoute:
   default via 192.168.0.1 dev wlp2s0  proto static  metric 600 
   169.254.0.0/16 dev wlp2s0  scope link  metric 1000 
   192.168.0.0/24 dev wlp2s0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.0.76  
metric 600
  Locales: 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1316634] Re: Does not automatically reconnect to hidden WiFi network

2016-06-05 Thread Alf Haakon Lund
Running Ubuntu Studio (Xubuntu) 14.04 I had this or a very similar
problem when I changed name and hid the SSID on my wifi.

nm-manager kept looking for the old SSID and would not connect to the
hidden network - I had to connect manually on boot.

When I told nm-manager to forget the old wifi the problem disappeared.
My computer now connects to the hidden SSID and networking is OK.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316634

Title:
  Does not automatically reconnect to hidden WiFi network

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Running Lubuntu 14.04 32-bit on a Lenovo 3000 C200 laptop with an
  integrated Broadcom network adapter, I installed
  firmware-b43-installer and then successfully connected to my hidden
  (SSID not broadcast) WiFi net.

  But I see that it will not automatically reconnect.  I don't have to
  re-enter the password, but I do have to click the nm-applet indicator,
  choose 'Connect to Hidden Wi-Fi Network' and then choose my already-
  defined connection, which indeed has been saved but not used to
  automatically reconnect.

  If I edit the connection, I see that on the General tab it is already
  set to 'Automatically connect to this network when it is available.'

  The only way I can get automatic reconnection is to enable SSID
  Broadcast.

  And a similar effect: If I am connected to the network while SSID
  Broadcast is in effect and then disable SSID Broadcast, network-
  manager immediately loses the connection.

  Someone suggested that network-manager would find the hidden network
  if I just waited, but after waiting 15 minutes it had still not
  connected.

  Dual-booting this same laptop with Windows Vista, I see that Windows
  knows how to automatically reconnect to the hidden net.

  I see that https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-
  manager/+bug/295796 describes similar behavior, but that was reported
  back in 2008 and I'm imagining that there should be a separate report
  for the new release.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: network-manager 0.9.8.8-0ubuntu7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3
  Architecture: i386
  CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iw'
  CurrentDesktop: LXDE
  Date: Tue May  6 10:24:32 2014
  IfupdownConfig:
   # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
   auto lo
   iface lo inet loopback
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-25 (10 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release i386 (20140416.2)
  IpRoute:
   default via 192.168.1.1 dev wlan0  proto static 
   192.168.1.0/24 dev wlan0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.118  
metric 9
  NetworkManager.state:
   [main]
   NetworkingEnabled=true
   WirelessEnabled=true
   WWANEnabled=true
   WimaxEnabled=true
  RfKill:
   0: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
  SourcePackage: network-manager
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  nmcli-con:
   NAME  UUID   TYPE
  TIMESTAMPTIMESTAMP-REAL AUTOCONNECT   READONLY   
DBUS-PATH 
   Wired connection 1ac7ba941-660f-40c5-9b1f-4d24accc6225   
802-3-ethernet1399385892   Tue 06 May 2014 10:18:12 AM EDTyes   
no /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Settings/1
   PRP   d25473c0-98d8-4d93-ab37-3dd070bbd34b   
802-11-wireless   1399386192   Tue 06 May 2014 10:23:12 AM EDTyes   
no /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Settings/0
  nmcli-dev:
   DEVICE TYPE  STATE DBUS-PATH 
 
   eth0   802-3-ethernetunavailable   
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1  
   wlan0  802-11-wireless   connected 
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/0
  nmcli-nm:
   RUNNING VERSIONSTATE   NET-ENABLED   WIFI-HARDWARE   
WIFI   WWAN-HARDWARE   WWAN  
   running 0.9.8.8connected   enabled   enabled 
enabledenabled disabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1316634/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 366780] Re: Please provide a mechanism whereby Wi-Fi networks can be prioritized

2014-10-16 Thread Alf Haakon Lund
I love to see the Fix released message!

Now I just wonder how to make my system use the fixed version? Will this
happen 'automagically' on my Ubuntu Studio 14.04 box?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366780

Title:
  Please provide a mechanism whereby Wi-Fi networks can be prioritized

Status in NetworkManager:
  Fix Released
Status in “network-manager” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: network-manager

  I've got few wifi network profiles. NM connects to 1st available
  network in alphabetical order. But at my home NM connects to slow and
  unstable free network and I want to connect to my own wifi router. I
  suggest to add some priorities to different networks to set the order
  which network to connect to.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager/+bug/366780/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1167826] Re: Simple scan produces wrong size documents

2013-04-16 Thread Alf Haakon Lund
OK. Please disregard issues 1 and 3 and dedicate this report to issue 2:

crop to page size does not produce expected results. Simple Scan saves
documents cropped to A4 as 211 x 297 mm where it should be 210 x 297
mm. Cropping to letter also produces slightly erroneous page size.

I'll report issue 3 as a separate bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to simple-scan in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167826

Title:
  Simple scan produces wrong size documents

Status in “simple-scan” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This is my first bug report, hope it will be helpful.

  There are several similar reports, most of which are classified as
  duplicates of https://bugs.launchpad.net/simple-scan/+bug/550856

  I'm reporting this as new because the above mentioned report is
  treated as a feature request (wishlist), maybe the description wasn't
  precise enough.

  Running Simple Scan 3.6.0 on Ubuntu Studio 12.10, three issues occur:

  1. Setting page size in preferences doesn't affect the size of a
  scanned document. Regardless of this setting scanning and saving
  produces a document 216 x 297 mm

  2. crop does not produce expected results. Simple Scan saves documents
  cropped to A4 as 211 x 297 mm

  3. Document metadata states that the document was created on Jan 1st,
  1970.

  Attached is a screenshot of evince reading file properties.

  Thank you for any help,
  Alf

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
  Package: simple-scan 3.6.0-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-27.30-lowlatency 3.5.7.7
  Uname: Linux 3.5.0-27-lowlatency i686
  ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Thu Apr 11 11:22:04 2013
  DriverPackageVersions:
   libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1
   libsane-extras 1.0.22.2ubuntu1
   hplip 3.12.6-3ubuntu4
   hpoj N/A
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-11-24 (137 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release i386 
(20121017.1)
  MachineType: TOSHIBA SATELLITE P850
  MarkForUpload: True
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-27-lowlatency 
root=UUID=317888b1-3d7a-483c-a5d0-18c62442febc ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: simple-scan
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 03/03/2012
  dmi.bios.vendor: TOSHIBA
  dmi.bios.version: 1.10
  dmi.board.asset.tag: *
  dmi.board.name: QFKAA
  dmi.board.vendor: TOSHIBA
  dmi.board.version: 1.00
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: *
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: TOSHIBA
  dmi.chassis.version: *
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnTOSHIBA:bvr1.10:bd03/03/2012:svnTOSHIBA:pnSATELLITEP850:pvrPSPKAE-00E001N5:rvnTOSHIBA:rnQFKAA:rvr1.00:cvnTOSHIBA:ct10:cvr*:
  dmi.product.name: SATELLITE P850
  dmi.product.version: PSPKAE-00E001N5
  dmi.sys.vendor: TOSHIBA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simple-scan/+bug/1167826/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 789762] Re: PDF metadata: Date of creation and modification is incorrectly set (or not set at all)

2013-04-16 Thread Alf Haakon Lund
I can see this occuring in Ubuntu 12.10. Plus everything penulci said.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to simple-scan in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789762

Title:
  PDF metadata: Date of creation and modification is incorrectly set (or
  not set at all)

Status in Simple Scan:
  Expired
Status in “simple-scan” package in Ubuntu:
  Expired

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: simple-scan

  Hello,
  I'm scanning some documents that I save in PDF format.
  This is I thin a minor bug, but the day of creation and modification is 
always gio 01 gen 1970 00:59:59 CET (Thu 01 Jan 1970 00:59:59 CET) and not 
today.
  I'm running 11.04 - the Natty Narwhal, and here are informations about 
apt-cache policy:
  simple-scan:
Installato: 2.32.0.1-0ubuntu2
Candidato:  2.32.0.1-0ubuntu2
Tabella versione:
   *** 2.32.0.1-0ubuntu2 0
  500 http://ch.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  Regards.
  Ab3l

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
  Package: simple-scan 2.32.0.1-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
  Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Sun May 29 07:13:47 2011
  DriverPackageVersions:
   libsane 1.0.22-2ubuntu1
   libsane-extras N/A
   hplip 3.11.1-2ubuntu2
   hpoj N/A
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1)
  MachineType: HP-Pavilion RR820AA-UUZ m7770.ch
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=it_CH:en
   LANG=it_CH.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-8-generic 
root=UUID=0edcaa3f-0ea6-433b-a178-562cb5d3a086 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SimpleScanLog:
   
  SourcePackage: simple-scan
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 11/24/2006
  dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies, LTD
  dmi.bios.version: 5.06
  dmi.board.name: LEONITE
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTek Computer INC.
  dmi.board.version: 5.00
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.chassis.version: 
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologies,LTD:bvr5.06:bd11/24/2006:svnHP-Pavilion:pnRR820AA-UUZm7770.ch:pvr:rvnASUSTekComputerINC.:rnLEONITE:rvr5.00:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct3:cvr:
  dmi.product.name: RR820AA-UUZ m7770.ch
  dmi.sys.vendor: HP-Pavilion

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/simple-scan/+bug/789762/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 819995] Re: Print to file PDF metadata broken

2013-04-16 Thread Alf Haakon Lund
I'm noticing  this on ubuntu 12.10 (32-bit)

In addition to the print to file, this bug affects several programs, at
the very least SImple Scan and Inkscape.

When viewing the pdf properties with evince, it says the pdf was created
by libcairo 1.9.5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cairo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819995

Title:
  Print to file PDF metadata broken

Status in “cairo” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal 64bit

  libgnomeprint2.2-0 - 2.18.8-0ubuntu1

  It seems libgnomeprint sends wrong date, Jan 1st 1970 to PDF metadata when 
printing to file (PDF)
  This behaviour is reproducible for me on both 64bit and 32bit versions of 
11.04
   
  Using dialog print to file choosing PDF as output format Creation Date 
and Last edited is always set to  Thu 01 Jän 1970 00:59:59 CET which is 
afaik Date 0 for Unices.
  I am using german localization but in case of needed screenshots I can of 
course change to english.
  This behaviour happens on my main machine (64bit) and my old notebook (32bit) 
looking to my self produced PDFs from 10.10 definitely show the same behaviour, 
I could also look on old backups for even older version.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cairo/+bug/819995/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 1167826] Re: Simple scan produces wrong size documents

2013-04-12 Thread Alf Haakon Lund
On 12. april 2013 11:06, Michael Nagel wrote:
 Hi Alf,

 thanks for your interest and feedback.
 Generally speaking, opening more tickets does not improve the situation as it 
 splits up the attention.
 Better help us to improve the existing tickets.

 On the other hand you should always have one issue per ticket and not do
 collections like this, again to keep discussion focused.

 So, as a consequence, I suggest that you:
 - merge your info 1 into page size setting is broken, use it as default 
 crop or fix it by other means
 Simple Scan Bugs Bug #550856
 - explain what the expected behavior is for issue 2, so I can suggest a 
 ticket where to discuss it
 - add your info about 3 to PDF metadata: Date of creation and modification 
 is incorrectly set (or not set at all) -- so this issue can be reopened

 Best Regards
 Michael


Thank you for feedback!

How do I merge? Just by adding the info from my issue 1 as a comment to 
the Bug #550856?

Alf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to simple-scan in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167826

Title:
  Simple scan produces wrong size documents

Status in “simple-scan” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This is my first bug report, hope it will be helpful.

  There are several similar reports, most of which are classified as
  duplicates of https://bugs.launchpad.net/simple-scan/+bug/550856

  I'm reporting this as new because the above mentioned report is
  treated as a feature request (wishlist), maybe the description wasn't
  precise enough.

  Running Simple Scan 3.6.0 on Ubuntu Studio 12.10, three issues occur:

  1. Setting page size in preferences doesn't affect the size of a
  scanned document. Regardless of this setting scanning and saving
  produces a document 216 x 297 mm

  2. crop does not produce expected results. Simple Scan saves documents
  cropped to A4 as 211 x 297 mm

  3. Document metadata states that the document was created on Jan 1st,
  1970.

  Attached is a screenshot of evince reading file properties.

  Thank you for any help,
  Alf

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
  Package: simple-scan 3.6.0-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-27.30-lowlatency 3.5.7.7
  Uname: Linux 3.5.0-27-lowlatency i686
  ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Thu Apr 11 11:22:04 2013
  DriverPackageVersions:
   libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1
   libsane-extras 1.0.22.2ubuntu1
   hplip 3.12.6-3ubuntu4
   hpoj N/A
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-11-24 (137 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release i386 
(20121017.1)
  MachineType: TOSHIBA SATELLITE P850
  MarkForUpload: True
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-27-lowlatency 
root=UUID=317888b1-3d7a-483c-a5d0-18c62442febc ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: simple-scan
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 03/03/2012
  dmi.bios.vendor: TOSHIBA
  dmi.bios.version: 1.10
  dmi.board.asset.tag: *
  dmi.board.name: QFKAA
  dmi.board.vendor: TOSHIBA
  dmi.board.version: 1.00
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: *
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: TOSHIBA
  dmi.chassis.version: *
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnTOSHIBA:bvr1.10:bd03/03/2012:svnTOSHIBA:pnSATELLITEP850:pvrPSPKAE-00E001N5:rvnTOSHIBA:rnQFKAA:rvr1.00:cvnTOSHIBA:ct10:cvr*:
  dmi.product.name: SATELLITE P850
  dmi.product.version: PSPKAE-00E001N5
  dmi.sys.vendor: TOSHIBA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simple-scan/+bug/1167826/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1167826] [NEW] Simple scan produces wrong size documents

2013-04-11 Thread Alf Haakon Lund
Public bug reported:

This is my first bug report, hope it will be helpful.

There are several similar reports, most of which are classified as
duplicates of https://bugs.launchpad.net/simple-scan/+bug/550856

I'm reporting this as new because the above mentioned report is treated
as a feature request (wishlist), maybe the description wasn't precise
enough.

Running Simple Scan 3.6.0 on Ubuntu Studio 12.10, three issues occur:

1. Setting page size in preferences doesn't affect the size of a scanned
document. Regardless of this setting scanning and saving produces a
document 216 x 297 mm

2. crop does not produce expected results. Simple Scan saves documents
cropped to A4 as 211 x 297 mm

3. Document metadata states that the document was created on Jan 1st,
1970.

Attached is a screenshot of evince reading file properties.

Thank you for any help,
Alf

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: simple-scan 3.6.0-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-27.30-lowlatency 3.5.7.7
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-27-lowlatency i686
ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Apr 11 11:22:04 2013
DriverPackageVersions:
 libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1
 libsane-extras 1.0.22.2ubuntu1
 hplip 3.12.6-3ubuntu4
 hpoj N/A
InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-11-24 (137 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release i386 
(20121017.1)
MachineType: TOSHIBA SATELLITE P850
MarkForUpload: True
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-27-lowlatency 
root=UUID=317888b1-3d7a-483c-a5d0-18c62442febc ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: simple-scan
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 03/03/2012
dmi.bios.vendor: TOSHIBA
dmi.bios.version: 1.10
dmi.board.asset.tag: *
dmi.board.name: QFKAA
dmi.board.vendor: TOSHIBA
dmi.board.version: 1.00
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: *
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: TOSHIBA
dmi.chassis.version: *
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnTOSHIBA:bvr1.10:bd03/03/2012:svnTOSHIBA:pnSATELLITEP850:pvrPSPKAE-00E001N5:rvnTOSHIBA:rnQFKAA:rvr1.00:cvnTOSHIBA:ct10:cvr*:
dmi.product.name: SATELLITE P850
dmi.product.version: PSPKAE-00E001N5
dmi.sys.vendor: TOSHIBA

** Affects: simple-scan (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 quantal

** Attachment added: scan test screenshot.jpg
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167826/+attachment/3640197/+files/scan%20test%20screenshot.jpg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to simple-scan in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167826

Title:
  Simple scan produces wrong size documents

Status in “simple-scan” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This is my first bug report, hope it will be helpful.

  There are several similar reports, most of which are classified as
  duplicates of https://bugs.launchpad.net/simple-scan/+bug/550856

  I'm reporting this as new because the above mentioned report is
  treated as a feature request (wishlist), maybe the description wasn't
  precise enough.

  Running Simple Scan 3.6.0 on Ubuntu Studio 12.10, three issues occur:

  1. Setting page size in preferences doesn't affect the size of a
  scanned document. Regardless of this setting scanning and saving
  produces a document 216 x 297 mm

  2. crop does not produce expected results. Simple Scan saves documents
  cropped to A4 as 211 x 297 mm

  3. Document metadata states that the document was created on Jan 1st,
  1970.

  Attached is a screenshot of evince reading file properties.

  Thank you for any help,
  Alf

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
  Package: simple-scan 3.6.0-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-27.30-lowlatency 3.5.7.7
  Uname: Linux 3.5.0-27-lowlatency i686
  ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Thu Apr 11 11:22:04 2013
  DriverPackageVersions:
   libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1
   libsane-extras 1.0.22.2ubuntu1
   hplip 3.12.6-3ubuntu4
   hpoj N/A
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-11-24 (137 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release i386 
(20121017.1)
  MachineType: TOSHIBA SATELLITE P850
  MarkForUpload: True
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-27-lowlatency 
root=UUID=317888b1-3d7a-483c-a5d0-18c62442febc ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: simple-scan
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 03/03/2012
  dmi.bios.vendor: TOSHIBA
  dmi.bios.version: 1.10
  dmi.board.asset.tag: *
  dmi.board.name: QFKAA
  dmi.board.vendor: TOSHIBA
  dmi.board.version: 1.00
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: *
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: TOSHIBA
  dmi.chassis.version: *
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnTOSHIBA:bvr1.10:bd03/03/2012:svnTOSHIBA:pnSATELLITEP850:pvrPSPKAE-00E001N5:rvnTOSHIBA:rnQFKAA:rvr1.00:cvnTOSHIBA:ct10:cvr*:
  dmi.product.name: SATELLITE P850
  dmi.product.version: PSPKAE-00E001N5
  dmi.sys.vendor: TOSHIBA

To manage 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1167826] Re: Simple scan produces wrong size documents

2013-04-11 Thread Alf Haakon Lund
Forgot to mention the scanner is an HP c4580 all-in-one.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to simple-scan in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167826

Title:
  Simple scan produces wrong size documents

Status in “simple-scan” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This is my first bug report, hope it will be helpful.

  There are several similar reports, most of which are classified as
  duplicates of https://bugs.launchpad.net/simple-scan/+bug/550856

  I'm reporting this as new because the above mentioned report is
  treated as a feature request (wishlist), maybe the description wasn't
  precise enough.

  Running Simple Scan 3.6.0 on Ubuntu Studio 12.10, three issues occur:

  1. Setting page size in preferences doesn't affect the size of a
  scanned document. Regardless of this setting scanning and saving
  produces a document 216 x 297 mm

  2. crop does not produce expected results. Simple Scan saves documents
  cropped to A4 as 211 x 297 mm

  3. Document metadata states that the document was created on Jan 1st,
  1970.

  Attached is a screenshot of evince reading file properties.

  Thank you for any help,
  Alf

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
  Package: simple-scan 3.6.0-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-27.30-lowlatency 3.5.7.7
  Uname: Linux 3.5.0-27-lowlatency i686
  ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Thu Apr 11 11:22:04 2013
  DriverPackageVersions:
   libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1
   libsane-extras 1.0.22.2ubuntu1
   hplip 3.12.6-3ubuntu4
   hpoj N/A
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-11-24 (137 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release i386 
(20121017.1)
  MachineType: TOSHIBA SATELLITE P850
  MarkForUpload: True
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-27-lowlatency 
root=UUID=317888b1-3d7a-483c-a5d0-18c62442febc ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: simple-scan
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 03/03/2012
  dmi.bios.vendor: TOSHIBA
  dmi.bios.version: 1.10
  dmi.board.asset.tag: *
  dmi.board.name: QFKAA
  dmi.board.vendor: TOSHIBA
  dmi.board.version: 1.00
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: *
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: TOSHIBA
  dmi.chassis.version: *
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnTOSHIBA:bvr1.10:bd03/03/2012:svnTOSHIBA:pnSATELLITEP850:pvrPSPKAE-00E001N5:rvnTOSHIBA:rnQFKAA:rvr1.00:cvnTOSHIBA:ct10:cvr*:
  dmi.product.name: SATELLITE P850
  dmi.product.version: PSPKAE-00E001N5
  dmi.sys.vendor: TOSHIBA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simple-scan/+bug/1167826/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp