Re: Ant 1.9.0

2013-01-31 Thread Matt Benson
Hi Antoine,
  I had made a start towards upgrading to Java 5 syntax in the Ant codebase
some months back.  At some point we started getting odd failures in Gump
which I wasn't able to understand.  It might be nice to figure this out and
finish the Java 5-ization for 1.9.0.

br,
Matt


On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.dewrote:

 Hi,

 I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release.

 In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs.

 Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ?

 Also, Jan Matèrne had proposed previously [1] to remove the Perforce Ant
 tasks from Ant due to the availability of better tasks supplied by Perforce.

 Now would be a good time to remove them.

 Do we need a vote for that ?

 Best regards,

 Antoine

 [1]
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201012.mbox/%3C000601cb97a0$970bde10$c5239a30$@de%3E


Re: Ant 1.9.0

2013-01-31 Thread Bruce Atherton
We've discussed this before[1] and already voted in favour of removing 
the commercial tasks from Ant some time ago[2]. A complication was that 
we wanted to create AntLibs for them if we couldn't get the vendors to 
support them directly so that there was minimal upset for our users, but 
apart from the VSS tasks that didn't happen. I did contact all the 
vendors at the time but I got virtually no response. The only company 
that did respond, as I recall, was Perforce. Perhaps that is why they 
now provide decent tasks themselves.


So this is one instance where what we wanted to happen has happened. +1 
to removing the tasks, with a document redirect on where to get the 
tasks now.


[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201005.mbox/browser
[2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201006.mbox/browser

On 30/01/2013 7:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:

Hi,

I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release.

In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs.

Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ?

Also, Jan Matèrne had proposed previously [1] to remove the Perforce Ant tasks 
from Ant due to the availability of better tasks supplied by Perforce.

Now would be a good time to remove them.

Do we need a vote for that ?

Best regards,

Antoine

[1] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201012.mbox/%3C000601cb97a0$970bde10$c5239a30$@de%3E



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org



Re: Ant 1.9.0

2013-01-31 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Hello Bruce, 

I can see myself implementing the removal of the Perforce Ant tasks, this 
should be pretty straightforward.

I will work on this this week-end.

Regards,

Antoine
On Jan 31, 2013, at 12:40 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote:

 We've discussed this before[1] and already voted in favour of removing the 
 commercial tasks from Ant some time ago[2]. A complication was that we wanted 
 to create AntLibs for them if we couldn't get the vendors to support them 
 directly so that there was minimal upset for our users, but apart from the 
 VSS tasks that didn't happen. I did contact all the vendors at the time but I 
 got virtually no response. The only company that did respond, as I recall, 
 was Perforce. Perhaps that is why they now provide decent tasks themselves.
 
 So this is one instance where what we wanted to happen has happened. +1 to 
 removing the tasks, with a document redirect on where to get the tasks now.
 
 [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201005.mbox/browser
 [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201006.mbox/browser
 
 On 30/01/2013 7:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release.
 
 In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs.
 
 Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ?
 
 Also, Jan Matèrne had proposed previously [1] to remove the Perforce Ant 
 tasks from Ant due to the availability of better tasks supplied by Perforce.
 
 Now would be a good time to remove them.
 
 Do we need a vote for that ?
 
 Best regards,
 
 Antoine
 
 [1] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201012.mbox/%3C000601cb97a0$970bde10$c5239a30$@de%3E
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org



Re: Ant 1.9.0

2013-01-31 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Hello Matt,

I have seen that you started upgrading to Java 5 syntax in the Ant codebase.

I do not see myself going systematically in the codebase to do that because I 
do not have the time to do it.

I will look to see whether there are failures in Gump.

I also got some failures running the unit tests in Java 1.7 locally on my Mac, 
I will need to dig into that and see whether the errors are reproduceable …

Regards,

Antoine


On Jan 31, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Matt Benson wrote:

 Hi Antoine,
  I had made a start towards upgrading to Java 5 syntax in the Ant codebase
 some months back.  At some point we started getting odd failures in Gump
 which I wasn't able to understand.  It might be nice to figure this out and
 finish the Java 5-ization for 1.9.0.
 
 br,
 Matt
 
 
 On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.dewrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release.
 
 In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs.
 
 Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ?
 
 Also, Jan Matèrne had proposed previously [1] to remove the Perforce Ant
 tasks from Ant due to the availability of better tasks supplied by Perforce.
 
 Now would be a good time to remove them.
 
 Do we need a vote for that ?
 
 Best regards,
 
 Antoine
 
 [1]
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201012.mbox/%3C000601cb97a0$970bde10$c5239a30$@de%3E


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org



Re: Ant 1.9.0

2013-01-31 Thread Bruce Atherton

Thanks very much, Antoine. It's appreciated.

On 13-01-31 06:11 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:

Hello Bruce,

I can see myself implementing the removal of the Perforce Ant tasks, this 
should be pretty straightforward.

I will work on this this week-end.

Regards,

Antoine




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org