Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release

2018-04-27 Thread Nigel Jones


On 2018/04/26 13:04:15, Graham Wallis  wrote: 

> So I would recommend trying 4.3.16 and 1.5.12.
I concur based on prereqs from the maven repo.
I do think it's worth considering moving to 5x/2x *AFTER* the 1.0 release. We 
would gain full java 8 spring support, compatability with java 9+ & some more 
reactive UI capabilities. More generally we should probably review other 
dependencies too though on a case by case basis


Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release

2018-04-26 Thread Graham Wallis
Hi Madhan

Currently we have Spring 4.3.8 and SpringBoot 1.5.7, but should update to 
at least 4.3.11 and 1.5.7 as these are documented as compatible versions.
Probably better than that (but as yet untried in Atlas) would be 4.3.16 
and 1.5.12 - also documented as compatible.
Spring has gone to v5 recently (Sep '17) and SpringBoot to v2 (Mar '18) - 
but I would suggest that we may not want to venture across a version 
boundary this close to the Atlas 1.0.0 release.

So I would recommend trying 4.3.16 and 1.5.12.

If anyone has any other information or opinions then please get involved 
:-)

Best regards,
  Graham

Graham Wallis
IBM Analytics
Internet: graham_wal...@uk.ibm.com 
IBM Laboratories, Hursley Park, Hursley, Hampshire SO21 2JN
Tel: +44 7741 379735




From:   Madhan Neethiraj <mad...@apache.org>
To: "dev@atlas.apache.org" <dev@atlas.apache.org>
Date:   25/04/2018 16:18
Subject:Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release



Mandy,

What is the Spring version to target?

Thanks,
Madhan




On 4/25/18, 1:36 AM, "Mandy Chessell" <mandy_chess...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:

Dear all,
I think we should move to the latest level of the spring 
framework/boot
 
All the best
Mandy
___
Mandy Chessell CBE FREng CEng FBCS
IBM Distinguished Engineer
 
Master Inventor
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Visiting Professor, Department of Computer Science, University of 
Sheffield
 
Email: mandy_chess...@uk.ibm.com
LinkedIn: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_pub_mandy-2Dchessell_22_897_a49=DwIFaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=Li6zJa6pLsu8dGS1GSW1j00glumVmLp0H5HVkn5QyAA=cphlXXIJynuE1fFJBdNBQBBW5yzK__jyCKxX2gweoZA=JyJR7lTN773ul90sNcw3AaSMuQmPCsc50WSOH_63428=

 
Assistant: Janet Brooks - jsbrook...@uk.ibm.com
 
 
 
From:   Nigel Jones <nigel.l.jo...@gmail.com>
To: <dev@atlas.apache.org>
    Date:   24/04/2018 17:01
    Subject:    Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release
 
 
 
 
 
On 2018/04/24 13:04:59, Graham Wallis <graham_wal...@uk.ibm.com> 
wrote: 
 
> Do we need to include anything about development versions including 
Maven, 
> Java, etc?
 
I think it would be worth mentioning in readme/ wiki build, though now 
we 
have the maven-enforcer in place we know the min prereq java is java 8 

update 151 & maven 3.5.0 which aren't far off (latest 172 - jdk 
11/18.10 
is next lts and could be 'interesting', and maven 3.5.3)
 
Post-release I think there's a few other questions about specific 
component versions (and pom standardization where it makes sense), but 
I 
wouldn't change anything close to release
 
 
 
 




Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU


Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release

2018-04-25 Thread Madhan Neethiraj
Mandy,

What is the Spring version to target?

Thanks,
Madhan




On 4/25/18, 1:36 AM, "Mandy Chessell" <mandy_chess...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:

Dear all,
I think we should move to the latest level of the spring framework/boot

All the best
Mandy
___
Mandy Chessell CBE FREng CEng FBCS
IBM Distinguished Engineer

Master Inventor
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Visiting Professor, Department of Computer Science, University of 
Sheffield

Email: mandy_chess...@uk.ibm.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mandy-chessell/22/897/a49

Assistant: Janet Brooks - jsbrook...@uk.ibm.com



From:   Nigel Jones <nigel.l.jo...@gmail.com>
To: <dev@atlas.apache.org>
Date:   24/04/2018 17:01
Subject:    Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release





On 2018/04/24 13:04:59, Graham Wallis <graham_wal...@uk.ibm.com> wrote: 

> Do we need to include anything about development versions including 
Maven, 
> Java, etc?

I think it would be worth mentioning in readme/ wiki build, though now we 
have the maven-enforcer in place we know the min prereq java is java 8 
update 151 & maven 3.5.0 which aren't far off (latest 172 - jdk 11/18.10 
is next lts and could be 'interesting', and maven 3.5.3)

Post-release I think there's a few other questions about specific 
component versions (and pom standardization where it makes sense), but I 
wouldn't change anything close to release








Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release

2018-04-25 Thread Mandy Chessell
Dear all,
I think we should move to the latest level of the spring framework/boot

All the best
Mandy
___
Mandy Chessell CBE FREng CEng FBCS
IBM Distinguished Engineer

Master Inventor
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Visiting Professor, Department of Computer Science, University of 
Sheffield

Email: mandy_chess...@uk.ibm.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mandy-chessell/22/897/a49

Assistant: Janet Brooks - jsbrook...@uk.ibm.com



From:   Nigel Jones <nigel.l.jo...@gmail.com>
To: <dev@atlas.apache.org>
Date:   24/04/2018 17:01
Subject:Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release





On 2018/04/24 13:04:59, Graham Wallis <graham_wal...@uk.ibm.com> wrote: 

> Do we need to include anything about development versions including 
Maven, 
> Java, etc?

I think it would be worth mentioning in readme/ wiki build, though now we 
have the maven-enforcer in place we know the min prereq java is java 8 
update 151 & maven 3.5.0 which aren't far off (latest 172 - jdk 11/18.10 
is next lts and could be 'interesting', and maven 3.5.3)

Post-release I think there's a few other questions about specific 
component versions (and pom standardization where it makes sense), but I 
wouldn't change anything close to release





Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release

2018-04-24 Thread Nigel Jones


On 2018/04/24 13:04:59, Graham Wallis  wrote: 

> Do we need to include anything about development versions including Maven, 
> Java, etc?

I think it would be worth mentioning in readme/ wiki build, though now we have 
the maven-enforcer in place we know the min prereq java is java 8 update 151 & 
maven 3.5.0 which aren't far off (latest 172 - jdk 11/18.10  is next lts and 
could be 'interesting', and maven 3.5.3)

Post-release I think there's a few other questions about specific component 
versions (and pom standardization where it makes sense), but I wouldn't change 
anything close to release



Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release

2018-04-24 Thread Graham Wallis
Hi Madhan

Do we need to include anything about development versions including Maven, 
Java, etc?


Best regards,
  Graham

Graham Wallis
IBM Analytics
Internet: graham_wal...@uk.ibm.com 
IBM Laboratories, Hursley Park, Hursley, Hampshire SO21 2JN
Tel: +44 7741 379735




From:   Madhan Neethiraj <mad...@apache.org>
To: "dev@atlas.apache.org" <dev@atlas.apache.org>
Date:   24/04/2018 00:45
Subject:    Dependent component versions for 1.0 release



Atlas dev,

 

Please review the following component versions used by upcoming Apache 
Atlas 1.0 release:

  - Hadoop: 2.7.1

  - JanusGraph: 0.2.0

  - TinkerPop:  3.2.6

  - HBase:  1.1.2

  - Solr:   5.5.1

  - Kafka:  1.0.0

  - Jackson:2.9.2

  - Spring: 4.3.8

  - Hive:   1.2.1

  - Sqoop:  1.4.6

  - Storm:  1.2.0

 

Based on earlier discussions, support for Hadoop 3 will be taken up in a 
subsequent release, perhaps 3.1.

 

Regards,

Madhan



Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU


Dependent component versions for 1.0 release

2018-04-23 Thread Madhan Neethiraj
Atlas dev,

 

Please review the following component versions used by upcoming Apache Atlas 
1.0 release:

  - Hadoop: 2.7.1

  - JanusGraph: 0.2.0

  - TinkerPop:  3.2.6

  - HBase:  1.1.2

  - Solr:   5.5.1

  - Kafka:  1.0.0

  - Jackson:    2.9.2

  - Spring: 4.3.8

  - Hive:   1.2.1

  - Sqoop:  1.4.6

  - Storm:  1.2.0

 

Based on earlier discussions, support for Hadoop 3 will be taken up in a 
subsequent release, perhaps 3.1.

 

Regards,

Madhan