[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Renan DelValle]

All,
The vote to accept the proposed packages as our official binary packages
for Apache Aurora 0.19.x has passed.


+1 (Binding)
--
Renan DelValle
David McLaughlin
Stephan Erb

There were no 0  or-1 votes. There were no non-binding votes.

The official packages are now available here:
https://dl.bintray.com/apache/aurora/

The GPG key used to sign the release are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS

Thank you to all who helped make this release.

-Renan

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:20 AM, Stephan Erb 
wrote:

> +1
>
> On 21.02.18, 20:01, "David McLaughlin"  wrote:
>
> +1 from me.
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Renan DelValle 
> wrote:
>
> > Another friendly reminder that we can't release the binary packages
> for
> > 0.19.x without at least three +1 binding votes.
> >
> > Not releasing a package for 0.19.x will create a problem for anyone
> trying
> > to upgrade to later versions as we recommend upgrading version by
> version.
> >
> >  Any and all feedback regarding these binary packages, binding or
> > otherwise, is welcome so that we may fix any issues that crop up.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Renan
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Renan DelValle 
> wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Friendly reminder to download, verify, and test so we can conclude
> the
> > > voting!
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > -Renan
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Renan DelValle 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Kicking off the voting with a +1 (binding) from me.
> > >>
> > >> Tested all distributions using the test scripts.
> > >>
> > >> -Renan
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Renan DelValle  >
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> All,
> > >>>
> > >>> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official
> deb
> > and
> > >>> rpm packaging for
> > >>> Apache Aurora 0.19.x:
> > >>>
> > >>> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
> > >>>
> > >>> The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:
> > >>>
> > >>> ---
> > >>>
> > >>> The branch used to create the packaging is:
> > >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
> > >>> .git;a=tree;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> > >>>
> > >>> The packages are available at:
> > >>> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
> > >>>
> > >>> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
> > >>>
> > >>> Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are
> > >>> available here:
> > >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
> > >>> .git;a=tree;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote will close on Wed Feb 14 13:35:18 PST 2018
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache
> Aurora
> > 0.19.x
> > >>> [ ] +0
> > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> > >>>
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Stephan Erb]

+1 

On 21.02.18, 20:01, "David McLaughlin"  wrote:

+1 from me.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Renan DelValle  wrote:

> Another friendly reminder that we can't release the binary packages for
> 0.19.x without at least three +1 binding votes.
>
> Not releasing a package for 0.19.x will create a problem for anyone trying
> to upgrade to later versions as we recommend upgrading version by version.
>
>  Any and all feedback regarding these binary packages, binding or
> otherwise, is welcome so that we may fix any issues that crop up.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Renan
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Renan DelValle  wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Friendly reminder to download, verify, and test so we can conclude the
> > voting!
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -Renan
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Renan DelValle 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Kicking off the voting with a +1 (binding) from me.
> >>
> >> Tested all distributions using the test scripts.
> >>
> >> -Renan
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Renan DelValle 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb
> and
> >>> rpm packaging for
> >>> Apache Aurora 0.19.x:
> >>>
> >>> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
> >>>
> >>> The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> The branch used to create the packaging is:
> >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
> >>> .git;a=tree;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> >>>
> >>> The packages are available at:
> >>> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
> >>>
> >>> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are
> >>> available here:
> >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
> >>> .git;a=tree;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The vote will close on Wed Feb 14 13:35:18 PST 2018
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora
> 0.19.x
> >>> [ ] +0
> >>> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[David McLaughlin]

+1 from me.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Renan DelValle  wrote:

> Another friendly reminder that we can't release the binary packages for
> 0.19.x without at least three +1 binding votes.
>
> Not releasing a package for 0.19.x will create a problem for anyone trying
> to upgrade to later versions as we recommend upgrading version by version.
>
>  Any and all feedback regarding these binary packages, binding or
> otherwise, is welcome so that we may fix any issues that crop up.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Renan
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Renan DelValle  wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Friendly reminder to download, verify, and test so we can conclude the
> > voting!
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -Renan
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Renan DelValle 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Kicking off the voting with a +1 (binding) from me.
> >>
> >> Tested all distributions using the test scripts.
> >>
> >> -Renan
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Renan DelValle 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb
> and
> >>> rpm packaging for
> >>> Apache Aurora 0.19.x:
> >>>
> >>> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
> >>>
> >>> The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> The branch used to create the packaging is:
> >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
> >>> .git;a=tree;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> >>>
> >>> The packages are available at:
> >>> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
> >>>
> >>> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are
> >>> available here:
> >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
> >>> .git;a=tree;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The vote will close on Wed Feb 14 13:35:18 PST 2018
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora
> 0.19.x
> >>> [ ] +0
> >>> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Renan DelValle]

Another friendly reminder that we can't release the binary packages for
0.19.x without at least three +1 binding votes.

Not releasing a package for 0.19.x will create a problem for anyone trying
to upgrade to later versions as we recommend upgrading version by version.

 Any and all feedback regarding these binary packages, binding or
otherwise, is welcome so that we may fix any issues that crop up.

Thanks,

-Renan


On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Renan DelValle  wrote:

> All,
>
> Friendly reminder to download, verify, and test so we can conclude the
> voting!
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Renan
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Renan DelValle  wrote:
>
>> Kicking off the voting with a +1 (binding) from me.
>>
>> Tested all distributions using the test scripts.
>>
>> -Renan
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Renan DelValle  wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb and
>>> rpm packaging for
>>> Apache Aurora 0.19.x:
>>>
>>> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
>>>
>>> The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> The branch used to create the packaging is:
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
>>> .git;a=tree;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
>>>
>>> The packages are available at:
>>> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
>>>
>>> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>>>
>>> Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are
>>> available here:
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
>>> .git;a=tree;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
>>>
>>>
>>> The vote will close on Wed Feb 14 13:35:18 PST 2018
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.19.x
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Renan DelValle]

All,

Friendly reminder to download, verify, and test so we can conclude the
voting!

Thanks!

-Renan

On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Renan DelValle  wrote:

> Kicking off the voting with a +1 (binding) from me.
>
> Tested all distributions using the test scripts.
>
> -Renan
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Renan DelValle  wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb and
>> rpm packaging for
>> Apache Aurora 0.19.x:
>>
>> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
>>
>> The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:
>>
>> ---
>>
>> The branch used to create the packaging is:
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
>> .git;a=tree;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
>>
>> The packages are available at:
>> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
>>
>> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>>
>> Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are
>> available here:
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
>> .git;a=tree;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
>>
>>
>> The vote will close on Wed Feb 14 13:35:18 PST 2018
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.19.x
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
>>
>> 
>> 
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Renan DelValle]

Kicking off the voting with a +1 (binding) from me.

Tested all distributions using the test scripts.

-Renan

On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Renan DelValle  wrote:

> All,
>
> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb and
> rpm packaging for
> Apache Aurora 0.19.x:
>
> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
>
> The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:
>
> ---
>
> The branch used to create the packaging is:
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-
> packaging.git;a=tree;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
>
> The packages are available at:
> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
>
> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>
> Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are
> available here:
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-
> packaging.git;a=tree;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
>
>
> The vote will close on Wed Feb 14 13:35:18 PST 2018
>
> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.19.x
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
>
> 
> 
>

[VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Renan DelValle]

All,

I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb and
rpm packaging for
Apache Aurora 0.19.x:

https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/

The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:

---

The branch used to create the packaging is:
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x

The packages are available at:
https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/

The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS

Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are available
here:
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x


The vote will close on Wed Feb 14 13:35:18 PST 2018

[ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.19.x
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Bill Farner]

We'll need to step back to a new point release.  I should be able to kick
this off next week unless i am beaten to the punch.

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Renan DelValle 
wrote:

> Should we try releasing the binaries again now that we tackled this issue?
> There's been a few folks on the Slack channel have been asking when the
> binaries for 0.19 will be released.
>
> -Renan
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Bill Farner  wrote:
>
> > I reverse my vote to -1 and am closing the vote as failed.
> >
> > Turns out i had some old debs in my dist/ dir, and the test script picked
> > those up.  After clearing those, i encounter the same issue.
> >
> > Here is the culprit:
> >
> > $ ag -i THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES
> > specs/debian/aurora-scheduler.startup.sh
> > 37:  -thermos_executor_resources="$THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES" \
> >
> > specs/debian/aurora-scheduler.upstart
> > 34:  -thermos_executor_resources="$THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES" \
> >
> > specs/debian/aurora-scheduler.init
> > 75:-thermos_executor_resources="$THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES" \
> >
> > specs/debian/aurora-scheduler.default
> > 65:THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES=""
> >
> > thermos_executor_resources is passed an empty string.  Here is the option
> > definition:
> >
> > @Parameter(names = "-thermos_executor_resources",
> > > description = "A comma separated list of additional resources to copy
> > > into the sandbox."
> > > + "Note: if thermos_executor_path is not the thermos_executor.pex file
> > > itself, "
> > > + "this must include it.")
> > > public List thermosExecutorResources = ImmutableList.of();
> >
> >
> > We expect this to become an empty list, however the parser emits a list
> of
> > size one, containing an empty string.  I've filed AURORA-1962
> >  for the issue.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Renan DelValle <
> renanidelva...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm running into the same issues as Stephan. I tried with Trusty,
> Xenial,
> > > and Jessie. Same issue with all.
> > >
> > > Somehow a Mesos fetcher entry with a URI value of '' gets injected into
> > the
> > > task protobuf.
> > >
> > > This is the command I ran for Trusty:
> > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
> > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-trusty/dist
> > >
> > > Oddly enough, we have deployed 0.19.0 packages for trusty without any
> > issue
> > > on at least two of our test clusters so it may have to do with our
> > > artifacts tests?
> > >
> > > I tried upgrading the trusty box to Mesos 1.2.2 and the problem
> > persisted.
> > >
> > > -Renan
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Mohit Jaggi 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Bill Farner 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We would need at least 2 more binding votes to complete this
> release.
> > > Do
> > > > > folks need more time?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:49 PM, thinker0 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1, we 0.19.0 small production tested
> > > > > > 2017년 12월 13일 (수) 04:05, Mohit Jaggi 님이
> 작성:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +0, we don't use the packages. If you just need someone to test
> > and
> > > > > > verify,
> > > > > > > I can do that. Let me know.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Bill Farner <
> wfar...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Friendly reminder that the vote is due to close tomorrow!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Stephan - is the issue you described reproducible?  Did i run
> > the
> > > > > same
> > > > > > > test
> > > > > > > > command(s) as you?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Bill Farner <
> > wfar...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 from me, as the test script passes for all artifacts
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I did not have time to run them prior to opening the vote;
> > but
> > > i
> > > > do
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > encounter the failure you did:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > $ ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
> > > > > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > OK (all tests passed)
> > > > > > > > > Connection to 127.0.0.1 closed.
> > > > > > > > > ==> aurora_jessie: Forcing shutdown of VM...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > the branch is missing
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > That i cannot speak for, unfortunately.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For those who have yet to try out the builds, here are the
> > test
> > > > > > > commands
> > > > > > > > i
> > > > > > > > > ran.  You can reproduce these by first downloading the
> > > artifacts
> > > > > (in
> > > > > > my
> > > > > > > > > case, they were under artifacts/*)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Renan DelValle]

Should we try releasing the binaries again now that we tackled this issue?
There's been a few folks on the Slack channel have been asking when the
binaries for 0.19 will be released.

-Renan

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Bill Farner  wrote:

> I reverse my vote to -1 and am closing the vote as failed.
>
> Turns out i had some old debs in my dist/ dir, and the test script picked
> those up.  After clearing those, i encounter the same issue.
>
> Here is the culprit:
>
> $ ag -i THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES
> specs/debian/aurora-scheduler.startup.sh
> 37:  -thermos_executor_resources="$THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES" \
>
> specs/debian/aurora-scheduler.upstart
> 34:  -thermos_executor_resources="$THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES" \
>
> specs/debian/aurora-scheduler.init
> 75:-thermos_executor_resources="$THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES" \
>
> specs/debian/aurora-scheduler.default
> 65:THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES=""
>
> thermos_executor_resources is passed an empty string.  Here is the option
> definition:
>
> @Parameter(names = "-thermos_executor_resources",
> > description = "A comma separated list of additional resources to copy
> > into the sandbox."
> > + "Note: if thermos_executor_path is not the thermos_executor.pex file
> > itself, "
> > + "this must include it.")
> > public List thermosExecutorResources = ImmutableList.of();
>
>
> We expect this to become an empty list, however the parser emits a list of
> size one, containing an empty string.  I've filed AURORA-1962
>  for the issue.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Renan DelValle 
> wrote:
>
> > I'm running into the same issues as Stephan. I tried with Trusty, Xenial,
> > and Jessie. Same issue with all.
> >
> > Somehow a Mesos fetcher entry with a URI value of '' gets injected into
> the
> > task protobuf.
> >
> > This is the command I ran for Trusty:
> > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
> > /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-trusty/dist
> >
> > Oddly enough, we have deployed 0.19.0 packages for trusty without any
> issue
> > on at least two of our test clusters so it may have to do with our
> > artifacts tests?
> >
> > I tried upgrading the trusty box to Mesos 1.2.2 and the problem
> persisted.
> >
> > -Renan
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Mohit Jaggi 
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Bill Farner 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > We would need at least 2 more binding votes to complete this release.
> > Do
> > > > folks need more time?
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:49 PM, thinker0 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1, we 0.19.0 small production tested
> > > > > 2017년 12월 13일 (수) 04:05, Mohit Jaggi 님이 작성:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +0, we don't use the packages. If you just need someone to test
> and
> > > > > verify,
> > > > > > I can do that. Let me know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Bill Farner  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Friendly reminder that the vote is due to close tomorrow!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Stephan - is the issue you described reproducible?  Did i run
> the
> > > > same
> > > > > > test
> > > > > > > command(s) as you?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Bill Farner <
> wfar...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 from me, as the test script passes for all artifacts
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I did not have time to run them prior to opening the vote;
> but
> > i
> > > do
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > > encounter the failure you did:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > $ ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
> > > > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > OK (all tests passed)
> > > > > > > > Connection to 127.0.0.1 closed.
> > > > > > > > ==> aurora_jessie: Forcing shutdown of VM...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > the branch is missing
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That i cannot speak for, unfortunately.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For those who have yet to try out the builds, here are the
> test
> > > > > > commands
> > > > > > > i
> > > > > > > > ran.  You can reproduce these by first downloading the
> > artifacts
> > > > (in
> > > > > my
> > > > > > > > case, they were under artifacts/*)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
> > > > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist/
> > > > > > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
> > > > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-trusty/dist/
> > > > > > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-xenial/
> > > > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-xenial/dist/
> > > > > > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/rpm/centos-7/
> > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-centos-
> > > > > > > > 

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Bill Farner]

I reverse my vote to -1 and am closing the vote as failed.

Turns out i had some old debs in my dist/ dir, and the test script picked
those up.  After clearing those, i encounter the same issue.

Here is the culprit:

$ ag -i THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES
specs/debian/aurora-scheduler.startup.sh
37:  -thermos_executor_resources="$THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES" \

specs/debian/aurora-scheduler.upstart
34:  -thermos_executor_resources="$THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES" \

specs/debian/aurora-scheduler.init
75:-thermos_executor_resources="$THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES" \

specs/debian/aurora-scheduler.default
65:THERMOS_EXECUTOR_RESOURCES=""

thermos_executor_resources is passed an empty string.  Here is the option
definition:

@Parameter(names = "-thermos_executor_resources",
> description = "A comma separated list of additional resources to copy
> into the sandbox."
> + "Note: if thermos_executor_path is not the thermos_executor.pex file
> itself, "
> + "this must include it.")
> public List thermosExecutorResources = ImmutableList.of();


We expect this to become an empty list, however the parser emits a list of
size one, containing an empty string.  I've filed AURORA-1962
 for the issue.


On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Renan DelValle 
wrote:

> I'm running into the same issues as Stephan. I tried with Trusty, Xenial,
> and Jessie. Same issue with all.
>
> Somehow a Mesos fetcher entry with a URI value of '' gets injected into the
> task protobuf.
>
> This is the command I ran for Trusty:
> ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
> /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-trusty/dist
>
> Oddly enough, we have deployed 0.19.0 packages for trusty without any issue
> on at least two of our test clusters so it may have to do with our
> artifacts tests?
>
> I tried upgrading the trusty box to Mesos 1.2.2 and the problem persisted.
>
> -Renan
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Mohit Jaggi  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Bill Farner  wrote:
> >
> > > We would need at least 2 more binding votes to complete this release.
> Do
> > > folks need more time?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:49 PM, thinker0  wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1, we 0.19.0 small production tested
> > > > 2017년 12월 13일 (수) 04:05, Mohit Jaggi 님이 작성:
> > > >
> > > > > +0, we don't use the packages. If you just need someone to test and
> > > > verify,
> > > > > I can do that. Let me know.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Bill Farner 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Friendly reminder that the vote is due to close tomorrow!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Stephan - is the issue you described reproducible?  Did i run the
> > > same
> > > > > test
> > > > > > command(s) as you?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Bill Farner  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 from me, as the test script passes for all artifacts
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I did not have time to run them prior to opening the vote; but
> i
> > do
> > > > not
> > > > > > > encounter the failure you did:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > $ ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
> > > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > OK (all tests passed)
> > > > > > > Connection to 127.0.0.1 closed.
> > > > > > > ==> aurora_jessie: Forcing shutdown of VM...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > the branch is missing
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That i cannot speak for, unfortunately.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For those who have yet to try out the builds, here are the test
> > > > > commands
> > > > > > i
> > > > > > > ran.  You can reproduce these by first downloading the
> artifacts
> > > (in
> > > > my
> > > > > > > case, they were under artifacts/*)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
> > > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist/
> > > > > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
> > > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-trusty/dist/
> > > > > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-xenial/
> > > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-xenial/dist/
> > > > > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/rpm/centos-7/
> > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-centos-
> > > > > > > 7/dist/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Each command took about 5 mins to run in my case.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A belated thanks to Stephan for adding the test script!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > commit b904b5f
> > > > > > >> Author: Stephan Erb 
> > > > > > >> Date:   Tue Feb 14 23:33:41 2017 +0100
> > > > > > >> Add basic test scripts for RPM and DEB packages
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Stephan Erb 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Renan DelValle]

I'm running into the same issues as Stephan. I tried with Trusty, Xenial,
and Jessie. Same issue with all.

Somehow a Mesos fetcher entry with a URI value of '' gets injected into the
task protobuf.

This is the command I ran for Trusty:
./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
/repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-trusty/dist

Oddly enough, we have deployed 0.19.0 packages for trusty without any issue
on at least two of our test clusters so it may have to do with our
artifacts tests?

I tried upgrading the trusty box to Mesos 1.2.2 and the problem persisted.

-Renan

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Mohit Jaggi  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Bill Farner  wrote:
>
> > We would need at least 2 more binding votes to complete this release.  Do
> > folks need more time?
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:49 PM, thinker0  wrote:
> >
> > > +1, we 0.19.0 small production tested
> > > 2017년 12월 13일 (수) 04:05, Mohit Jaggi 님이 작성:
> > >
> > > > +0, we don't use the packages. If you just need someone to test and
> > > verify,
> > > > I can do that. Let me know.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Bill Farner 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Friendly reminder that the vote is due to close tomorrow!
> > > > >
> > > > > Stephan - is the issue you described reproducible?  Did i run the
> > same
> > > > test
> > > > > command(s) as you?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Bill Farner 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 from me, as the test script passes for all artifacts
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I did not have time to run them prior to opening the vote; but i
> do
> > > not
> > > > > > encounter the failure you did:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $ ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
> > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > OK (all tests passed)
> > > > > > Connection to 127.0.0.1 closed.
> > > > > > ==> aurora_jessie: Forcing shutdown of VM...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > the branch is missing
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That i cannot speak for, unfortunately.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For those who have yet to try out the builds, here are the test
> > > > commands
> > > > > i
> > > > > > ran.  You can reproduce these by first downloading the artifacts
> > (in
> > > my
> > > > > > case, they were under artifacts/*)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
> > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist/
> > > > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
> > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-trusty/dist/
> > > > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-xenial/
> > > > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-xenial/dist/
> > > > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/rpm/centos-7/
> > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-centos-
> > > > > > 7/dist/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Each command took about 5 mins to run in my case.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A belated thanks to Stephan for adding the test script!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > commit b904b5f
> > > > > >> Author: Stephan Erb 
> > > > > >> Date:   Tue Feb 14 23:33:41 2017 +0100
> > > > > >> Add basic test scripts for RPM and DEB packages
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Stephan Erb 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> I was just trying to run the validation scripts for Debian
> Jessie
> > > and
> > > > > >> those are failing with the error:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I1210 20:48:36.172399  7371 fetcher.cpp:283] Fetching directly
> > into
> > > > the
> > > > > >> sandbox directory
> > > > > >> I1210 20:48:36.172417  7371 fetcher.cpp:220] Fetching URI ''
> > > > > >> Failed to fetch '': A relative path was passed for the resource
> > but
> > > > the
> > > > > >> Mesos framework home was not specified. Please either provide
> this
> > > > > >> config option or avoid using a relative path
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> End fetcher log for container 48b4029a-231d-441a-98a6-
> > 8c6538fe0efa
> > > > > >> E1210 20:48:36.220979  5590 fetcher.cpp:558] Failed to run
> mesos-
> > > > > >> fetcher: Failed to fetch all URIs for container
> > '48b4029a-231d-441a-
> > > > > >> 98a6-8c6538fe0efa' with exit status: 256
> > > > > >> E1210 20:48:36.221174  5590 slave.cpp:4650] Container
> > > '48b4029a-231d-
> > > > > >> 441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa' for executor
> > > > 'thermos-vagrant-test-hello_world-
> > > > > >> 0-74b87db4-0d97-4d03-a7f9-9482a1060f20' of framework
> > 208bd6e7-5d17-
> > > > > >> 4257-9564-71af57900310- fail
> > > > > >> ed to start: Failed to fetch all URIs for container
> > '48b4029a-231d-
> > > > > >> 441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa' with exit status: 256
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Did those tests work for you?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> In addition, but most probably unrelated, the branch is missing
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Bill Farner]

We would need at least 2 more binding votes to complete this release.  Do
folks need more time?

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:49 PM, thinker0  wrote:

> +1, we 0.19.0 small production tested
> 2017년 12월 13일 (수) 04:05, Mohit Jaggi 님이 작성:
>
> > +0, we don't use the packages. If you just need someone to test and
> verify,
> > I can do that. Let me know.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Bill Farner  wrote:
> >
> > > Friendly reminder that the vote is due to close tomorrow!
> > >
> > > Stephan - is the issue you described reproducible?  Did i run the same
> > test
> > > command(s) as you?
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Bill Farner 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 from me, as the test script passes for all artifacts
> > > >
> > > > I did not have time to run them prior to opening the vote; but i do
> not
> > > > encounter the failure you did:
> > > >
> > > > $ ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
> > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist
> > > > 
> > > > OK (all tests passed)
> > > > Connection to 127.0.0.1 closed.
> > > > ==> aurora_jessie: Forcing shutdown of VM...
> > > >
> > > > the branch is missing
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That i cannot speak for, unfortunately.
> > > >
> > > > For those who have yet to try out the builds, here are the test
> > commands
> > > i
> > > > ran.  You can reproduce these by first downloading the artifacts (in
> my
> > > > case, they were under artifacts/*)
> > > >
> > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
> > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist/
> > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
> > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-trusty/dist/
> > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-xenial/
> > > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-xenial/dist/
> > > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/rpm/centos-7/
> > /repo/artifacts/aurora-centos-
> > > > 7/dist/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64
> > > >
> > > > Each command took about 5 mins to run in my case.
> > > >
> > > > A belated thanks to Stephan for adding the test script!
> > > >
> > > > commit b904b5f
> > > >> Author: Stephan Erb 
> > > >> Date:   Tue Feb 14 23:33:41 2017 +0100
> > > >> Add basic test scripts for RPM and DEB packages
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Stephan Erb 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I was just trying to run the validation scripts for Debian Jessie
> and
> > > >> those are failing with the error:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> I1210 20:48:36.172399  7371 fetcher.cpp:283] Fetching directly into
> > the
> > > >> sandbox directory
> > > >> I1210 20:48:36.172417  7371 fetcher.cpp:220] Fetching URI ''
> > > >> Failed to fetch '': A relative path was passed for the resource but
> > the
> > > >> Mesos framework home was not specified. Please either provide this
> > > >> config option or avoid using a relative path
> > > >>
> > > >> End fetcher log for container 48b4029a-231d-441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa
> > > >> E1210 20:48:36.220979  5590 fetcher.cpp:558] Failed to run mesos-
> > > >> fetcher: Failed to fetch all URIs for container '48b4029a-231d-441a-
> > > >> 98a6-8c6538fe0efa' with exit status: 256
> > > >> E1210 20:48:36.221174  5590 slave.cpp:4650] Container
> '48b4029a-231d-
> > > >> 441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa' for executor
> > 'thermos-vagrant-test-hello_world-
> > > >> 0-74b87db4-0d97-4d03-a7f9-9482a1060f20' of framework 208bd6e7-5d17-
> > > >> 4257-9564-71af57900310- fail
> > > >> ed to start: Failed to fetch all URIs for container '48b4029a-231d-
> > > >> 441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa' with exit status: 256
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Did those tests work for you?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> In addition, but most probably unrelated, the branch is missing on
> > http
> > > >> s://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging. The ASF bot might have
> missed
> > > >> it.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 10:50 -0800, Bill Farner wrote:
> > > >> > All,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official
> deb
> > > >> > and
> > > >> > rpm packaging for
> > > >> > Apache Aurora 0.19.x:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > https://dl.bintray.com/bill/aurora/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > ---
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The branch used to create the packaging is:
> > > >> >
> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tr
> > > >> > ee;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The packages are available at:
> > > >> > https://dl.bintray.com/wfarner/aurora/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are
> > > >> > available
> > > >> > here:
> > > >> >
> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tr
> > > >> > 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[thinker0]

+1, we 0.19.0 small production tested
2017년 12월 13일 (수) 04:05, Mohit Jaggi 님이 작성:

> +0, we don't use the packages. If you just need someone to test and verify,
> I can do that. Let me know.
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Bill Farner  wrote:
>
> > Friendly reminder that the vote is due to close tomorrow!
> >
> > Stephan - is the issue you described reproducible?  Did i run the same
> test
> > command(s) as you?
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Bill Farner  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 from me, as the test script passes for all artifacts
> > >
> > > I did not have time to run them prior to opening the vote; but i do not
> > > encounter the failure you did:
> > >
> > > $ ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
> > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist
> > > 
> > > OK (all tests passed)
> > > Connection to 127.0.0.1 closed.
> > > ==> aurora_jessie: Forcing shutdown of VM...
> > >
> > > the branch is missing
> > >
> > >
> > > That i cannot speak for, unfortunately.
> > >
> > > For those who have yet to try out the builds, here are the test
> commands
> > i
> > > ran.  You can reproduce these by first downloading the artifacts (in my
> > > case, they were under artifacts/*)
> > >
> > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
> > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist/
> > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
> > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-trusty/dist/
> > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-xenial/
> > > /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-xenial/dist/
> > > ./test/test-artifact.sh test/rpm/centos-7/
> /repo/artifacts/aurora-centos-
> > > 7/dist/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64
> > >
> > > Each command took about 5 mins to run in my case.
> > >
> > > A belated thanks to Stephan for adding the test script!
> > >
> > > commit b904b5f
> > >> Author: Stephan Erb 
> > >> Date:   Tue Feb 14 23:33:41 2017 +0100
> > >> Add basic test scripts for RPM and DEB packages
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Stephan Erb  wrote:
> > >
> > >> I was just trying to run the validation scripts for Debian Jessie and
> > >> those are failing with the error:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I1210 20:48:36.172399  7371 fetcher.cpp:283] Fetching directly into
> the
> > >> sandbox directory
> > >> I1210 20:48:36.172417  7371 fetcher.cpp:220] Fetching URI ''
> > >> Failed to fetch '': A relative path was passed for the resource but
> the
> > >> Mesos framework home was not specified. Please either provide this
> > >> config option or avoid using a relative path
> > >>
> > >> End fetcher log for container 48b4029a-231d-441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa
> > >> E1210 20:48:36.220979  5590 fetcher.cpp:558] Failed to run mesos-
> > >> fetcher: Failed to fetch all URIs for container '48b4029a-231d-441a-
> > >> 98a6-8c6538fe0efa' with exit status: 256
> > >> E1210 20:48:36.221174  5590 slave.cpp:4650] Container '48b4029a-231d-
> > >> 441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa' for executor
> 'thermos-vagrant-test-hello_world-
> > >> 0-74b87db4-0d97-4d03-a7f9-9482a1060f20' of framework 208bd6e7-5d17-
> > >> 4257-9564-71af57900310- fail
> > >> ed to start: Failed to fetch all URIs for container '48b4029a-231d-
> > >> 441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa' with exit status: 256
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Did those tests work for you?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> In addition, but most probably unrelated, the branch is missing on
> http
> > >> s://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging. The ASF bot might have missed
> > >> it.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 10:50 -0800, Bill Farner wrote:
> > >> > All,
> > >> >
> > >> > I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb
> > >> > and
> > >> > rpm packaging for
> > >> > Apache Aurora 0.19.x:
> > >> >
> > >> > https://dl.bintray.com/bill/aurora/
> > >> >
> > >> > The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:
> > >> >
> > >> > ---
> > >> >
> > >> > The branch used to create the packaging is:
> > >> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tr
> > >> > ee;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> > >> >
> > >> > The packages are available at:
> > >> > https://dl.bintray.com/wfarner/aurora/
> > >> >
> > >> > The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
> > >> >
> > >> > Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are
> > >> > available
> > >> > here:
> > >> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tr
> > >> > ee;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > The vote will close on Wed Dec 13 10:34:51 PST 2017
> > >> >
> > >> > [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora
> > >> > 0.19.x
> > >> > [ ] +0
> > >> > [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Bill Farner]

Friendly reminder that the vote is due to close tomorrow!

Stephan - is the issue you described reproducible?  Did i run the same test
command(s) as you?

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Bill Farner  wrote:

> +1 from me, as the test script passes for all artifacts
>
> I did not have time to run them prior to opening the vote; but i do not
> encounter the failure you did:
>
> $ ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
> /repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist
> 
> OK (all tests passed)
> Connection to 127.0.0.1 closed.
> ==> aurora_jessie: Forcing shutdown of VM...
>
> the branch is missing
>
>
> That i cannot speak for, unfortunately.
>
> For those who have yet to try out the builds, here are the test commands i
> ran.  You can reproduce these by first downloading the artifacts (in my
> case, they were under artifacts/*)
>
> ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
> /repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist/
> ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
> /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-trusty/dist/
> ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-xenial/
> /repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-xenial/dist/
> ./test/test-artifact.sh test/rpm/centos-7/ /repo/artifacts/aurora-centos-
> 7/dist/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64
>
> Each command took about 5 mins to run in my case.
>
> A belated thanks to Stephan for adding the test script!
>
> commit b904b5f
>> Author: Stephan Erb 
>> Date:   Tue Feb 14 23:33:41 2017 +0100
>> Add basic test scripts for RPM and DEB packages
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Stephan Erb  wrote:
>
>> I was just trying to run the validation scripts for Debian Jessie and
>> those are failing with the error:
>>
>>
>> I1210 20:48:36.172399  7371 fetcher.cpp:283] Fetching directly into the
>> sandbox directory
>> I1210 20:48:36.172417  7371 fetcher.cpp:220] Fetching URI ''
>> Failed to fetch '': A relative path was passed for the resource but the
>> Mesos framework home was not specified. Please either provide this
>> config option or avoid using a relative path
>>
>> End fetcher log for container 48b4029a-231d-441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa
>> E1210 20:48:36.220979  5590 fetcher.cpp:558] Failed to run mesos-
>> fetcher: Failed to fetch all URIs for container '48b4029a-231d-441a-
>> 98a6-8c6538fe0efa' with exit status: 256
>> E1210 20:48:36.221174  5590 slave.cpp:4650] Container '48b4029a-231d-
>> 441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa' for executor 'thermos-vagrant-test-hello_world-
>> 0-74b87db4-0d97-4d03-a7f9-9482a1060f20' of framework 208bd6e7-5d17-
>> 4257-9564-71af57900310- fail
>> ed to start: Failed to fetch all URIs for container '48b4029a-231d-
>> 441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa' with exit status: 256
>>
>>
>> Did those tests work for you?
>>
>>
>> In addition, but most probably unrelated, the branch is missing on http
>> s://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging. The ASF bot might have missed
>> it.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 10:50 -0800, Bill Farner wrote:
>> > All,
>> >
>> > I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb
>> > and
>> > rpm packaging for
>> > Apache Aurora 0.19.x:
>> >
>> > https://dl.bintray.com/bill/aurora/
>> >
>> > The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:
>> >
>> > ---
>> >
>> > The branch used to create the packaging is:
>> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tr
>> > ee;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
>> >
>> > The packages are available at:
>> > https://dl.bintray.com/wfarner/aurora/
>> >
>> > The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>> >
>> > Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are
>> > available
>> > here:
>> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tr
>> > ee;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
>> >
>> >
>> > The vote will close on Wed Dec 13 10:34:51 PST 2017
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora
>> > 0.19.x
>> > [ ] +0
>> > [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Bill Farner]

+1 from me, as the test script passes for all artifacts

I did not have time to run them prior to opening the vote; but i do not
encounter the failure you did:

$ ./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
/repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist

OK (all tests passed)
Connection to 127.0.0.1 closed.
==> aurora_jessie: Forcing shutdown of VM...

the branch is missing


That i cannot speak for, unfortunately.

For those who have yet to try out the builds, here are the test commands i
ran.  You can reproduce these by first downloading the artifacts (in my
case, they were under artifacts/*)

./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/debian-jessie/
/repo/artifacts/aurora-debian-jessie/dist/
./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
/repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-trusty/dist/
./test/test-artifact.sh test/deb/ubuntu-xenial/
/repo/artifacts/aurora-ubuntu-xenial/dist/
./test/test-artifact.sh test/rpm/centos-7/
/repo/artifacts/aurora-centos-7/dist/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64

Each command took about 5 mins to run in my case.

A belated thanks to Stephan for adding the test script!

commit b904b5f
> Author: Stephan Erb 
> Date:   Tue Feb 14 23:33:41 2017 +0100
> Add basic test scripts for RPM and DEB packages



On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Stephan Erb  wrote:

> I was just trying to run the validation scripts for Debian Jessie and
> those are failing with the error:
>
>
> I1210 20:48:36.172399  7371 fetcher.cpp:283] Fetching directly into the
> sandbox directory
> I1210 20:48:36.172417  7371 fetcher.cpp:220] Fetching URI ''
> Failed to fetch '': A relative path was passed for the resource but the
> Mesos framework home was not specified. Please either provide this
> config option or avoid using a relative path
>
> End fetcher log for container 48b4029a-231d-441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa
> E1210 20:48:36.220979  5590 fetcher.cpp:558] Failed to run mesos-
> fetcher: Failed to fetch all URIs for container '48b4029a-231d-441a-
> 98a6-8c6538fe0efa' with exit status: 256
> E1210 20:48:36.221174  5590 slave.cpp:4650] Container '48b4029a-231d-
> 441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa' for executor 'thermos-vagrant-test-hello_world-
> 0-74b87db4-0d97-4d03-a7f9-9482a1060f20' of framework 208bd6e7-5d17-
> 4257-9564-71af57900310- fail
> ed to start: Failed to fetch all URIs for container '48b4029a-231d-
> 441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa' with exit status: 256
>
>
> Did those tests work for you?
>
>
> In addition, but most probably unrelated, the branch is missing on http
> s://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging. The ASF bot might have missed
> it.
>
>
> On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 10:50 -0800, Bill Farner wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb
> > and
> > rpm packaging for
> > Apache Aurora 0.19.x:
> >
> > https://dl.bintray.com/bill/aurora/
> >
> > The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:
> >
> > ---
> >
> > The branch used to create the packaging is:
> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tr
> > ee;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> >
> > The packages are available at:
> > https://dl.bintray.com/wfarner/aurora/
> >
> > The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
> >
> > Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are
> > available
> > here:
> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tr
> > ee;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> >
> >
> > The vote will close on Wed Dec 13 10:34:51 PST 2017
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora
> > 0.19.x
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Stephan Erb]

I was just trying to run the validation scripts for Debian Jessie and
those are failing with the error:


I1210 20:48:36.172399  7371 fetcher.cpp:283] Fetching directly into the
sandbox directory
I1210 20:48:36.172417  7371 fetcher.cpp:220] Fetching URI ''
Failed to fetch '': A relative path was passed for the resource but the
Mesos framework home was not specified. Please either provide this
config option or avoid using a relative path

End fetcher log for container 48b4029a-231d-441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa
E1210 20:48:36.220979  5590 fetcher.cpp:558] Failed to run mesos-
fetcher: Failed to fetch all URIs for container '48b4029a-231d-441a-
98a6-8c6538fe0efa' with exit status: 256
E1210 20:48:36.221174  5590 slave.cpp:4650] Container '48b4029a-231d-
441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa' for executor 'thermos-vagrant-test-hello_world-
0-74b87db4-0d97-4d03-a7f9-9482a1060f20' of framework 208bd6e7-5d17-
4257-9564-71af57900310- fail
ed to start: Failed to fetch all URIs for container '48b4029a-231d-
441a-98a6-8c6538fe0efa' with exit status: 256


Did those tests work for you?


In addition, but most probably unrelated, the branch is missing on http
s://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging. The ASF bot might have missed
it.


On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 10:50 -0800, Bill Farner wrote:
> All,
> 
> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb
> and
> rpm packaging for
> Apache Aurora 0.19.x:
> 
> https://dl.bintray.com/bill/aurora/
> 
> The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:
> 
> ---
> 
> The branch used to create the packaging is:
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tr
> ee;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> 
> The packages are available at:
> https://dl.bintray.com/wfarner/aurora/
> 
> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
> 
> Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are
> available
> here:
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tr
> ee;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> 
> 
> The vote will close on Wed Dec 13 10:34:51 PST 2017
> 
> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora
> 0.19.x
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...

[VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Bill Farner]

All,

I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb and
rpm packaging for
Apache Aurora 0.19.x:

https://dl.bintray.com/bill/aurora/

The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:

---

The branch used to create the packaging is:
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x

The packages are available at:
https://dl.bintray.com/wfarner/aurora/

The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS

Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are available
here:
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x


The vote will close on Wed Dec 13 10:34:51 PST 2017

[ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.19.x
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...