Re: Flaky test in JmsIO help
Hi I will take a look. That’s probably a race condition with the broker service. Regards JB > Le 5 oct. 2021 à 21:21, Miguel Anzo Palomo a écrit > : > > > Hi, I've been working on checking out why is this issue happening (flaky test > in JmsIO). The logs in this example indicate that the problem is a > NullPointerException, specifically in this receiveNoWait() operation at this > line of the test. The only way I see that a NullPointerException is being > caused there, is if the consumer is closed at that point, and the only way I > have been able to reproduce a NullPointerException locally in the lines > mentioned in the log is by closing the consumer before that read operation. > > My idea right now is that there could be some intermittency with ActiveMQ > that caused the flaky test at that moment, is there a way to know if that was > the case? Right now I only have two known instances of the flake, this one on > August 23, and another one on September 9 (that jenkins link is no longer > available). From what I’ve been told it is running on the cloud compute > instance apache-ci-beam-jenkins. > > Thanks > > -- > Miguel Angel Anzo Palomo | WIZELINE > Software Engineer > miguel.a...@wizeline.com > Remote Office > > This email and its contents (including any attachments) are being sent to > you on the condition of confidentiality and may be protected by legal > privilege. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended recipient > is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately > notify the sender by replying to this message and delete the material > immediately from your system. Any further use, dissemination, distribution > or reproduction of this email is strictly prohibited. Further, no > representation is made with respect to any content contained in this email.
Re: LGPL-2.1 in beam-vendor-grpc
Hi You can take a look on https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html Regards JB > Le 10 mai 2021 à 12:56, Elliotte Rusty Harold a écrit : > > Anyone have a link to the official Apache policy about this? Thanks. > >> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:07 AM Jan Lukavský wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> we are bundling dependencies with LGPL-2.1, according to license header >> in META-INF/maven/org.jboss.modules/jboss-modules/pom.xml. I think is >> might be an issue, already reported here: [1]. I created [2] to track it >> on our side. >> >> Jan >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22555 >> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12316 >> > > > -- > Elliotte Rusty Harold > elh...@ibiblio.org
Re: LGPL-2.1 in beam-vendor-grpc
Yeah LGPL is cat X license. So it should not be embedded and distributed. Regards JB > Le 10 mai 2021 à 12:07, Jan Lukavský a écrit : > > Hi, > > we are bundling dependencies with LGPL-2.1, according to license header in > META-INF/maven/org.jboss.modules/jboss-modules/pom.xml. I think is might be > an issue, already reported here: [1]. I created [2] to track it on our side. > > Jan > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22555 > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12316 >
Re: Builds Meeting this Thursday
Hi Ismaël. Thanks for sharing. I started to evaluate GitHub actions on some other Apache projects and the doc is interesting. Regards JB > Le 8 févr. 2021 à 12:22, Ismaël Mejía a écrit : > > Just for reference and related to this thread. It seems we may end up > also having this queue issue (even if we don't fully move to Github > actions). > "For Apache projects, starting December 2020 we are experiencing a > high strain of GitHub Actions jobs. All Apache projects are sharing > 180 jobs and as more projects are using GitHub Actions the job queue > becomes a serious bottleneck." > > An interesting document shared recently on builds@ goes deeper on how > the Airflow project is dealing with this: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZZeZ4BYMNX7ycGRUKAXv0s6etz1g-90Onn5nRQQHOfE/edit# > >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 1:28 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:49 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for sharing this Pablo, This looks super interesting. We should >>> see if it could make sense to migrate our Jenkins infra to GitHub >>> Actions given that it is free and quickly becoming the new 'standard', >>> Good points it is 'free' because we will bring our machines and Google >>> pays :) bad points we will become 100% github dependant. >>> >> >> Github actions have a really big advantage over Jenkins: they run on >> forks, not just branches. This is very useful to non-commmiter >> contributors. >> >> On the minus side it's not clear if one can see the logs from the >> integration tests, which is blocking some work in the >> maven-site-plugin: >> >> https://github.com/apache/maven-site-plugin/pull/34#issuecomment-762207488 >> >> -- >> Elliotte Rusty Harold >> elh...@ibiblio.org
Re: Community Examples Repository
Hi, I don't have problem to move the examples in a dedicated repository. However, IMHO, we have to: 1. Keep a build of examples linked to latest core release/SNAPSHOT 2. Include the examples in the distribution (convenient for the users) On another topic, I think it would be better to avoid usage of Google Doc for such kind of discussion and directly share on the mailing list (at least a summary/light details). Regards JB On Thursday, August 02, 2018 00:12 CEST, David Cavazos wrote: Hi everyone! We wanted to migrate the examples from the core repository to a new Beam community examples repository. As the number of examples grow, it makes sense to modularize and decouple the core functionality from the examples. We will also create some guidelines with the best practices for new examples to be submitted. For more details, feel free to take a look and comment on the proposal. Cheers,David
Re: Any Beamers at OSCON?
Hi Pablo Unfortunately I won't be there (in Europe currently). Enjoy !! Regards JB On 2018-07-16 06:22, Pablo Estrada wrote: Hello everyone, I am reaching out for people that will be attending this year's OSCon in Portland[1], starting tomorrow 10/16. I am aware of a few Beam people that will be attending along with me, and I'm sure we'll be glad to see others. I am also aware of one talk involving Beam, by Holden Karau [2]. Let me know if anyone else is also going to OSCon, so that we can meet up, and chat. I'll be spending time at the Google booth, and maybe at some of the talks! Best -P. [1] https://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon/oscon-or [1] [2] https://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon/oscon-or/public/schedule/detail/66320 [2] -- Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback Links: -- [1] https://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon/oscon-or [2] https://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon/oscon-or/public/schedule/detail/66320
