Re: Review Request 14737: CLOUDSTACK-702: IP alias verification tests on VR
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/#review27231 --- test/integration/component/maint/test_multiple_ip_ranges.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/#comment53039 Remove this line test/integration/component/maint/test_multiple_ip_ranges.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/#comment53043 Skip the test if the zone.networktype is not basic. if cls.zone.networktype == 'Basic': cls.new_vlan = PublicIpRange.create(cls.api_client, cls.services[vlan_ip_range]) else: self.skipTest(This test can be run only on basic zone) - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Oct. 18, 2013, 9:27 a.m., sanjeev n wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/ --- (Updated Oct. 18, 2013, 9:27 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Added following code in the existing test 1.Moved vm deployment code to setUp method and vm destroy code to tearDown method 2.Added test to verify ip alias removal after destroying last vm in the cidr 3.Added tests to verify ip alias verification on VR after reboot and stop/start VR Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_multiple_ip_ranges.py 3f0035e Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/diff/ Testing --- Yes Thanks, sanjeev n
Re: Review Request 14737: CLOUDSTACK-702: IP alias verification tests on VR
On Oct. 21, 2013, 7:19 a.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote: test/integration/component/maint/test_multiple_ip_ranges.py, line 150 https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/diff/1/?file=366277#file366277line150 Skip the test if the zone.networktype is not basic. if cls.zone.networktype == 'Basic': cls.new_vlan = PublicIpRange.create(cls.api_client, cls.services[vlan_ip_range]) else: self.skipTest(This test can be run only on basic zone) Oh this is in setupclass, you can use this if cls.zone.networktype == 'Basic': cls.new_vlan = PublicIpRange.create(cls.api_client, cls.services[vlan_ip_range]) else: raise unittest.SkipTest(This can be run only on basic zone only) - SrikanteswaraRao --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/#review27231 --- On Oct. 18, 2013, 9:27 a.m., sanjeev n wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/ --- (Updated Oct. 18, 2013, 9:27 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Added following code in the existing test 1.Moved vm deployment code to setUp method and vm destroy code to tearDown method 2.Added test to verify ip alias removal after destroying last vm in the cidr 3.Added tests to verify ip alias verification on VR after reboot and stop/start VR Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_multiple_ip_ranges.py 3f0035e Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/diff/ Testing --- Yes Thanks, sanjeev n
Re: LXC and Networking
On 21-Oct-2013, at 2:41 AM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com wrote: Shanker, We were using the nonoss build, and we had to add a line in the nonossComponentContext.xml (like the ticket says). I did not try with the oss version, maybe there is a ossComponentContext.xml somewhere... I don't know. I rebuilt ACS 4.2 nonoss from Git. Cluster addition works now. Thanks for the tip. list clusters name=LXC1 count = 1 cluster: name = LXC1 id = a723620c-2f89-487d-993b-343442906fac allocationstate = Enabled clustertype = CloudManaged cpuovercommitratio = 3 hypervisortype = LXC managedstate = Managed memoryovercommitratio = 1 podid = 56b8baec-94f2-42b8-8483-3362c8bd0601 podname = Zone21-Pod1 zoneid = 2f328497-79bf-44dd-93a4-d5844b151437 zonename = Zone21 After I got pass this issue, I am still stuck on KVM system vms not coming online properly. Something kills the VM randomly. Sometimes the Console Proxy gets some IP, sometimes not. Same for SSVM. But that's another issue :) :) Will update on the progress at my end too. Francois On 10/20/2013, 4:04 PM, Shanker Balan wrote: On 20-Oct-2013, at 10:41 PM, Shanker Balan shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com wrote: On 10-Oct-2013, at 2:40 AM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com wrote: Thanks Phong about the networking answers. I will follow the KVM docs. Regarding the resource manager, we did compile the nonoss package on our own. Are you saying we require an extra deps? Hi Francois, Have you been able to make progress with LXC? I just hit the Could not find corresponding resource manager for lxc issue too. This is with the RPMs from http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.2/. It looks to me that the RPMs don't have LXC compiled in or are missing the required JAR dep. [root@csman2-1 ~]# rpm -ql cloudstack-management |grep hyperviso /usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/WEB-INF/lib/cloud-plugin-hypervisor-baremetal-4.2.0.jar /usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/WEB-INF/lib/cloud-plugin-hypervisor-kvm-4.2.0.jar /usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/WEB-INF/lib/cloud-plugin-hypervisor-ovm-4.2.0.jar /usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/WEB-INF/lib/cloud-plugin-hypervisor-ucs-4.2.0.jar /usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/WEB-INF/lib/cloud-plugin-hypervisor-vmware-4.2.0.jar /usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/WEB-INF/lib/cloud-plugin-hypervisor-xen-4.2.0.jar [root@csman2-1 ~]# cloudmonkey add cluster clustername=lxc hypervisor=lxc zoneid=2f328497-79bf-44dd-93a4-d5844b151437 podid=56b8baec-94f2-42b8-8483-3362c8bd0601 clustertype=CloudManaged : Could not find corresponding resource manager for lxc [root@csman2-1 WEB-INF]# rpm -qa|grep cloudstack- cloudstack-management-4.2.0-1.el6.x86_64 cloudstack-common-4.2.0-1.el6.x86_64 cloudstack-awsapi-4.2.0-1.el6.x86_64 cloudstack-cli-4.2.0-1.el6.x86_64 cloudstack-usage-4.2.0-1.el6.x86_64 [root@csman2-1 WEB-INF]# lsb_release -a LSB Version: :base-4.0-amd64:base-4.0-noarch:core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noarch Distributor ID: CentOS Description:CentOS release 6.4 (Final) Release:6.4 Codename: Final [root@csman2-1 WEB-INF]# Looks like you already have a ticket open at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4849. I can see that the LxcServerDiscoverer beam is indeed loaded but still unable to add an LXC cluster. 2013-10-20 15:44:13,778 INFO [utils.component.ComponentContext] (Timer-2:null) Configuring com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.discoverer.LxcServerDiscoverer_EnhancerByCloudStack_42c0e23d 2013-10-20 15:44:17,508 INFO [utils.component.ComponentContext] (Timer-2:null) Starting com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.discoverer.LxcServerDiscoverer_EnhancerByCloudStack_42c0e23d [root@csman2-1 ~]# grep -A 6 -B 6 -i lxc /usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/WEB-INF/classes/componentContext.xml bean id=resourceDiscoverers class=com.cloud.utils.component.AdapterList property name=Adapters list ref bean=XcpServerDiscoverer/ ref bean=SecondaryStorageDiscoverer/ ref bean=KvmServerDiscoverer/ ref bean=LxcServerDiscoverer/ ref bean=BareMetalDiscoverer/ ref bean=OvmDiscoverer/ /list /property /bean Regards. -- @shankerbalan M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055 CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient
Re: Review Request 14467: fix for Invalid SMTP breaks HA
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14467/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 8:29 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Changes --- updated the patch according to current master Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4792 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4792 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- added the connection and socket timeout parameters for SMTP and sending message in new thread so that HA doesn't get blocked beacause of hang in sending email alert Diffs (updated) - server/src/com/cloud/alert/AlertManagerImpl.java ed0c9fd Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14467/diff/ Testing --- tested manually on my local setup Thanks, Anshul Gangwar
4.3 Management resource design
Hi Team, Trust you had an amazing weekend and all is well. I would like to get involved in the 4.3 management resource side of things. Is it possible? Of particular interest to me is something I saw on this link: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Update+UI+visual+appearance# I hope to be of more help in other projects as time goes by. I also believe this will assist in making better documentation. Kindly do advice. Thank you in advance Kind Regards, Onuonga Frankie.
Review Request 14780: add netaddr package to the marvin dependency list
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14780/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- add netaddr package to the marvin dependency list Diffs - tools/marvin/setup.py eeed3bf Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14780/diff/ Testing --- tested the marvin installation Thanks, SrikanteswaraRao Talluri
Re: Review Request 14738: Testscript for DeployVM User data enhancement
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/#review27236 --- test/integration/component/test_deploy_vm_userdata_reg.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/#comment53046 remove this test/integration/component/test_deploy_vm_userdata_reg.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/#comment53047 remove this,you are not using this anywhere. test/integration/component/test_deploy_vm_userdata_reg.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/#comment53048 unnecessary line test/integration/component/test_deploy_vm_userdata_reg.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/#comment53049 remove this line test/integration/component/test_deploy_vm_userdata_reg.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/#comment53050 Is 'test' tag required? test/integration/component/test_deploy_vm_userdata_reg.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/#comment53051 remove print statement , use self.debug instead test/integration/component/test_deploy_vm_userdata_reg.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/#comment53053 fix the indentation test/integration/component/test_deploy_vm_userdata_reg.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/#comment53052 remove this line - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Oct. 18, 2013, 10:56 a.m., suresh sadhu wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/ --- (Updated Oct. 18, 2013, 10:56 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, SrikanteswaraRao Talluri and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: cloudstack-2272 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/cloudstack-2272 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This script validates VM-deployment with user-data of size more than 2048(which includes deployment as well as validation part after applying the user-data) Diffs - test/integration/component/test_deploy_vm_userdata_reg.py PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/diff/ Testing --- yes Thanks, suresh sadhu
RE: Cannot create VM instance using template converted from snapshot
Your assumption is right and it's a bug. An issue exits for the same in open
state .please update your observation in below bug:
CLOUDSTACK-4549 ceph:deployvm from template created from snapshot is failing
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4549
regards
sadhu
-Original Message-
From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id]
Sent: 21 October 2013 11:29
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Cannot create VM instance using template converted from snapshot
Dear all,
We are using CloudStack 4.2.0, KVM hypervisors and Ceph RBD primary storage.
We are able to create a volume snapshot of a VM instance's root-disk, and
convert the snapshot into a template. However, we are not able to create a new
VM instance based on the template.Error messages on both the
management-server.log and agent.log shows that the problem happened during the
creation of the volume, specifically during the copying of the template from
secondary storage for volume creation.
Logs on management-server.log:
=
2013-10-16 11:57:23,118 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-13:null) Seq 34-1629225029: Processing: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 161342671900, via: 34, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.Answer:{result:false,details:
java.lang.NullPointerException\n\tat
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:2469)\n\tat
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingR
esource.java:1230)\n\tat
com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:525)\n\tat
com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:852)\n\tat
com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:83)\n\tat
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolEx
ecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146)\n\tat
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)\n\tat
java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)\n,wait:0}}] }
2013-10-16 11:57:23,119 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(StatsCollector-3:null) Seq 34-1629225029: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
161342671900, via: 34, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { Answer } }
2013-10-16 11:57:23,549 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-3:null)
===START=== 103.25.200.2 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=1a5ba5a7-5756-4bae-bf21-67fc4d1b5a5aresponse=jsonsessionkey=PA1sQOGCDpcgv9KuxH6rulGrhhM%3D
_=1381895842670
2013-10-16 11:57:23,594 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-3:null)
===END=== 103.25.200.2 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=1a5ba5a7-5756-4bae-bf21-67fc4d1b5a5aresponse=jsonsessionkey=PA1sQOGCDpcgv9KuxH6rulGrhhM%3D_=
1381895842670
2013-10-16 11:57:26,547 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-22:null) ===START=== 103.25.200.2 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=1a5ba5a7-5756-4bae-bf21-67fc4d1b5a5aresponse=jsonsessionkey=PA1sQOGCDpcgv9KuxH6rulGrhhM%3D
_=1381895845670
2013-10-16 11:57:26,602 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-22:null) ===END=== 103.25.200.2 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=1a5ba5a7-5756-4bae-bf21-67fc4d1b5a5aresponse=jsonsessionkey=PA1sQOGCDpcgv9KuxH6rulGrhhM%3D_
=1381895845670
2013-10-16 11:57:27,255 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-14:null) SeqA 61-109650: Processing Seq 61-109650: { Cmd
, MgmtId: -1, via: 61, Ver: v1, Flags: 11,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.ConsoleProxyLoadReportComman
d:{_proxyVmId:2039,_loadInfo:{\n \connections\: []\n},wait:0}}] }
2013-10-16 11:57:27,278 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-14:null) SeqA 61-109650: Sending Seq 61-109650: {
Ans: , MgmtId: 161342671900, via: 61, Ver: v1, Flags: 100010,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.AgentControlAnsw
er:{result:true,wait:0}}] }
2013-10-16 11:57:28,060 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-15:null) Seq 34-1629225027: Processing: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 161342671900, via: 34, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer:{
result:false,details:com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
Failed to copy
/mnt/91afb8e1-6117-3e7e-a068-f980c49570a4/61e60cb9-88ec-401a-b7f8-940a568c23c2.raw
to b622fa54-aa6e-424d-a351-5a2d3f2728fe,wait:0}}] }
2013-10-16 11:57:28,060 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentAttache]
(AgentManager-Handler-15:null) Seq 34-1629225027: No more commands found
2013-10-16 11:57:28,060 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(Job-Executor-3:job-2437 = [ 1a5ba5a7-5756-4bae-bf21-67fc4d1b5a5a ]) Seq
34-1629225027: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 161342671900, via: 34, Ver: v1,
Flags: 110, { CopyCmdAnswer } }
2013-10-16 11:57:28,144 INFO [storage.volume.VolumeServiceImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-2437 = [ 1a5ba5a7-5756-4bae-bf21-67fc4d1b5a5a ]) releasing
lock for VMTemplateStoragePool 122
2013-10-16 11:57:28,145 WARN [utils.db.Merovingian2]
(Job-Executor-3:job-2437 = [ 1a5ba5a7-5756-4bae-bf21-67fc4d1b5a5a ]) Was unable
to find lock for the key template_spool_ref122 and thread id 7779986
2013-10-16 11:57:28,146 DEBUG [cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl]
Re: Review Request 14738: Testscript for DeployVM User data enhancement
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/#review27237 --- test/integration/component/test_deploy_vm_userdata_reg.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/#comment53054 This test is not cleaning up the resources it has created. - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Oct. 18, 2013, 10:56 a.m., suresh sadhu wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/ --- (Updated Oct. 18, 2013, 10:56 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, SrikanteswaraRao Talluri and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: cloudstack-2272 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/cloudstack-2272 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This script validates VM-deployment with user-data of size more than 2048(which includes deployment as well as validation part after applying the user-data) Diffs - test/integration/component/test_deploy_vm_userdata_reg.py PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/diff/ Testing --- yes Thanks, suresh sadhu
Re: Review Request 14647: CLOUDSTACK-3583: Management server stop is not removing the PID
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14647/#review27238 --- Ship it! LGTM. - Rajesh Battala On Oct. 15, 2013, 10:05 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14647/ --- (Updated Oct. 15, 2013, 10:05 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Rajesh Battala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3583 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3583 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The current implementation of #service cloudstack-management stop kills the process. The PID file and the lock file both continue to exist until the the service is started again, which replaces them. When the service has been stopped this causes #service cloudstack-management status to return message like: cloudstack-management dead but pid file exists The pid file locates at /var/run/cloudstack-management.pid and lock file at /var/lock/subsys/cloudstack-management. Starting cloudstack-management will take care of them or you can manually clean up In the fix I am removing the PID and the lock file once the service has been successfully killed. Also when the service is cleanly stopped the return value is 3, added the same check in handle_pid_file(). Diffs - packaging/centos63/cloud-management.rc 35f31b2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14647/diff/ Testing --- Tested locally : The status is now as #service cloudstack-management status cloudstack-management is stopped Thanks, Saksham Srivastava
Re: Incomplete API docs?
Yes - it's really a bug in ApiXmlDocWriter. Please file it. --David On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Demetrius Tsitrelis demetrius.tsitre...@citrix.com wrote: Do you still think there needs to be a bug filed for the missing APIs? -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 1:21 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Incomplete API docs? +1 Radhika on the 4.3 release page I have solicited volunteers for different release activities. Looks like the high level tasks could use a better breakdown, do you want to take a stab at breaking doc into sub tasks and folks interested can fill in their name. Animesh -Original Message- From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Incomplete API docs? Hi All, Our API documentation requires a serious refurbishment. How about creating a doc sprint for enhancing API documentation ? I am in the process of setting up a Wiki page at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Documentation+S pr int+for+Enhancing+API+Documentation to track this activity. Feel free int+for+Enhancing+API+to add/ edit/ remove the page content. I request all of you to volunteer so that we will have a comprehensive API doc set by next release. Appreciate your feedback. Regards -Radhika -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 7:36 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Incomplete API docs? Demetrius do you mind creating an issue in JIRA? -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 5:15 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Incomplete API docs? The commands.xml generated as a result of mvn build (mvn clean install - P developer,systemvm -DskipTests), doesn't include the commands mentioned by Demetrius. Looks like some regression bug in ApiXmlDocWriter - it used to include all the commands in 3.0.x version of the code. -Alena. From: Demetrius Tsitrelis dtsitre...@live.commailto:dtsitre...@live.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 4:33 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Incomplete API docs? I grep'ed the source code and came up with a list of the APIs which the UI uses. That list is at the end of this message. You can see that many of them (addNetscalerLoadBalancer, addVmwareDc, etc.) are not in the generated API documentation which appears at http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/TOC_Root_Admin.htm l Is this something wrong with the input files or is a tool at fault? Here's the list of APIs used by the UI: activateProject addAccountToProject addBaremetalDhcp addBaremetalPxeKickStartServer addCluster addHost addImageStore addIpToNic addLdapConfiguration addNetscalerLoadBalancer addNetworkServiceProvider addNicToVirtualMachine addRegion addTrafficType addUcsManager addVmwareDc addVpnUser archiveAlerts archiveEvents assignToGlobalLoadBalancerRule assignToLoadBalancerRule assignVirtualMachine associateIpAddress associateUcsProfileToBlade attachIso attachVolume authorizeSecurityGroupEgress authorizeSecurityGroupIngress cancelHostMaintenance cancelStorageMaintenance configureInternalLoadBalancerElement configureVirtualRouterElement copyIso copyTemplate createAccount createAffinityGroup createAutoScalePolicy createAutoScaleVmGroup createAutoScaleVmProfile createCondition createDiskOffering createDomain createEgressFirewallRule createFirewallRule createGlobalLoadBalancerRule createIpForwardingRule createLBHealthCheckPolicy createLBStickinessPolicy createLoadBalancer createLoadBalancerRule createNetwork createNetworkACL createNetworkACLList createNetworkOffering createPhysicalNetwork createPod createPortableIpRange createPortForwardingRule createPrivateGateway createProject createRemoteAccessVpn createSecondaryStagingStore createSecurityGroup createServiceOffering createSnapshot createSnapshotPolicy createStaticRoute createStorageNetworkIpRange createStoragePool createTags createTemplate createUser createVlanIpRange createVMSnapshot createVolume createVPC createVpnConnection createVpnCustomerGateway createVpnGateway createZone dedicateCluster
Re: Incomplete API docs?
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, Our API documentation requires a serious refurbishment. Hi Radhika: What do you see as lacking in our current API docs (aside from them not working ;) ) How about creating a doc sprint for enhancing API documentation ? I am in the process of setting up a Wiki page at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Documentation+Sprint+for+Enhancing+API+Documentation to track this activity. Feel free to add/ edit/ remove the page content. I request all of you to volunteer so that we will have a comprehensive API doc set by next release. Appreciate your feedback.
Re: Review Request 14737: CLOUDSTACK-702: IP alias verification tests on VR
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 9:29 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Changes --- Incorporated the review comments. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Added following code in the existing test 1.Moved vm deployment code to setUp method and vm destroy code to tearDown method 2.Added test to verify ip alias removal after destroying last vm in the cidr 3.Added tests to verify ip alias verification on VR after reboot and stop/start VR Diffs (updated) - test/integration/component/maint/test_multiple_ip_ranges.py 3f0035e Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/diff/ Testing --- Yes Thanks, sanjeev n
Re: Review Request 14737: CLOUDSTACK-702: IP alias verification tests on VR
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/#review27240 --- Ship it! Ship It! - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Oct. 21, 2013, 9:29 a.m., sanjeev n wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 9:29 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Added following code in the existing test 1.Moved vm deployment code to setUp method and vm destroy code to tearDown method 2.Added test to verify ip alias removal after destroying last vm in the cidr 3.Added tests to verify ip alias verification on VR after reboot and stop/start VR Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_multiple_ip_ranges.py 3f0035e Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14737/diff/ Testing --- Yes Thanks, sanjeev n
Re: Review Request 14593: CLOUDSTACK-1833: Automation - Adding scale virtual machine test cases
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14593/#review27239 --- tools/marvin/setup.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/14593/#comment53055 Remove brackets ddt = 0.4.0 is enough - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Oct. 16, 2013, 12:08 p.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14593/ --- (Updated Oct. 16, 2013, 12:08 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Some of the basic P1 test cases for scaling up CPU and RAM for running VMs. More tests to be added on top of this - in progress. DDT library needed to run the test case. It can be installed with pip install ddt command. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_scale_vm.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/base.py 0d52224 tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/common.py 164ef20 tools/marvin/setup.py eeed3bf Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14593/diff/ Testing --- Tested on XenServer. Not attaching logs because different test cases were run at different time, not all at once. All test cases running on XenServer, if at all needed, will add log after running them once again. Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Incomplete API docs?
That's actually a great point. One of my favorites is: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/changeServiceForSystemVm.html Is ID really UUID? or the human readable ID? --David. On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote: Hi David, They are simple one liners that do not convey anything about the API. -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:54 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Incomplete API docs? On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, Our API documentation requires a serious refurbishment. Hi Radhika: What do you see as lacking in our current API docs (aside from them not working ;) ) How about creating a doc sprint for enhancing API documentation ? I am in the process of setting up a Wiki page at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Documentation+Sprint+for+Enhancing+API+Documentation to track this activity. Feel free to add/ edit/ remove the page content. I request all of you to volunteer so that we will have a comprehensive API doc set by next release. Appreciate your feedback.
[Proposal] cpu socket count of hosts
Hi, I'm planning to provide some additional infrastructure statistics i.e., number of hosts/ CPU sockets apart from the details that we have in our dash board. Cloustack manages various number of hosts / cpu sockets which reflects the size of cloud. When we add the host we collect the number of CPU sockets and add this information in HostReponse. So we can calculate the cpu socket number summing the number of sockets for each host using listHostsAPI. Please provide me comments/feedback Thanks Harikrishna
Re: [proposal] Autoscaling CPU/RAM feature
Hi, We have cpu and ram overcommit ratios that can be set. Hypervisor does the autoscaling based on contention. -Harikrishna On 21-Oct-2013, at 10:13 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu ng.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I read about the new feature on 4.2 version: dynamic scaling of CPU and RAM - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dynamic+scaling+of+CPU+and+RAM I'm wonder why we don't support autoscaling CPU and RAM feature, which acts like the current autoscaling. Particularly, when deploying VM, users set memory_static_min and memory_static_max and ACS choose memory_dynamic_min and memory_dynamic_max, for example, memory_dynamic_min=memory_dynamic_max=memory_static_min. While running, if the VM is in pressure, ACS automatically change memory_dynamic_min, memory_dynamic_max based on pre-defined policy. At configuration period, users may set these below parameters: memory_static_min memory_static_max duration quiet time interval threshold Any idea? Cheers, -- N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
Re: [Proposal] cpu socket count of hosts
I have filed a ticket for this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4908 -Harikrishna On 21-Oct-2013, at 4:13 PM, HARIKRISHNA PATNALA harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, I'm planning to provide some additional infrastructure statistics i.e., number of hosts/ CPU sockets apart from the details that we have in our dash board. Cloustack manages various number of hosts / cpu sockets which reflects the size of cloud. When we add the host we collect the number of CPU sockets and add this information in HostReponse. So we can calculate the cpu socket number summing the number of sockets for each host using listHostsAPI. Please provide me comments/feedback Thanks Harikrishna
Re: Review Request 14593: CLOUDSTACK-1833: Automation - Adding scale virtual machine test cases
On Oct. 21, 2013, 3:17 p.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote: tools/marvin/setup.py, line 55 https://reviews.apache.org/r/14593/diff/3/?file=365068#file365068line55 Remove brackets ddt = 0.4.0 is enough Done - Gaurav --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14593/#review27239 --- On Oct. 21, 2013, 6:24 p.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14593/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 6:24 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Some of the basic P1 test cases for scaling up CPU and RAM for running VMs. More tests to be added on top of this - in progress. DDT library needed to run the test case. It can be installed with pip install ddt command. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_scale_vm.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/base.py 4f15137 tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/common.py 164ef20 tools/marvin/setup.py eeed3bf Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14593/diff/ Testing --- Tested on XenServer. Not attaching logs because different test cases were run at different time, not all at once. All test cases running on XenServer, if at all needed, will add log after running them once again. Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 14593: CLOUDSTACK-1833: Automation - Adding scale virtual machine test cases
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14593/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 6:24 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Changes --- Review Changes. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Some of the basic P1 test cases for scaling up CPU and RAM for running VMs. More tests to be added on top of this - in progress. DDT library needed to run the test case. It can be installed with pip install ddt command. Diffs (updated) - test/integration/component/test_scale_vm.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/base.py 4f15137 tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/common.py 164ef20 tools/marvin/setup.py eeed3bf Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14593/diff/ Testing --- Tested on XenServer. Not attaching logs because different test cases were run at different time, not all at once. All test cases running on XenServer, if at all needed, will add log after running them once again. Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
RE: [Discuss] Donation of RDP client code
Hi Wei ZHOU, Thank you for your positive feedback. Adding the console to the systemVM would happen after a donation, because we would want to do the integration in public. Therefore, it would be premature to contact Hugo about his system VM work. DL -Original Message- From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 October 2013 18:15 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [Discuss] Donation of RDP client code It looks very nice. Thanks! Hugo are working on the refactor of systemvm. Maybe it need to be modified. 2013/10/17 Donal Lafferty donal.laffe...@citrix.com This donation addresses our need for an RDP client free of IP restrictions that can be included with Apache CloudStack's console VM. RDP is of interest, because Hyper-V exposes VM consoles over RDP. However, Apache CloudStack does not have an RDP client that is easy to build, can easily run in the console VM, and has no IP dependencies. The donated code addresses this gap. The source is for an all-Java solution, which meets the console VM's expectations of a Java-based renderer. A Maven pom.xml is included that can be incorporated in the Apache CloudStack build. Finally, the code has no significant IP dependencies. Only JUnit 3.8.1 (Common Public License Version 1.0) and tomcat-embed-core 7.0.30 (Apache License, Version 2.03) are referenced by the pom.xml. No third party Java code is used or included. The client's source is in the diff attached to the Review Board submission https://reviews.apache.org/r/14701/ This submission includes technical details in the description field. The code was developed for Citrix Systems by a contractor. Note that the client still has to be integrated with console system VM. However, it makes more sense to do this after we're certain that the client will go into ACS. Please have a look, all opinions welcome!
[ACS 42] Problem when creating template from Root-disk
Hi Guys, I got a problem with my acs 42 installation : Trying to create a template from an existing vm, but it never become available. It keeps in state Ready : No On my secondary storage, the right directory is well created, but it doesn't contain the template.properties file. I didn't found any mgmt server logs entries that could explain me the reason why the template isn't available. I've tried to restart my mgmt server daemon and also my ssvm and my nfs secondary storage daemon, but no changes. Any idea about my problem ? Also, my secondary storage is 96% full, could this be a part of the root cause of the problem ? I have also tried to delete this template from the UI, but i got this error msg : Failed to update state. In the mgmt server log i got theses entries : 2013-10-21 14:53:35,945 ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-591 = [ 481fa987-3967-44c1-90d7-1a6c7dfb49ac ]) Unexpected exception while executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.template.DeleteTemplateCmd com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to update state at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject.processEvent(TemplateObject.java:164) at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.TemplateServiceImpl.deleteTemplateAsync(TemplateServiceImpl.java:558) at com.cloud.template.HypervisorTemplateAdapter.delete(HypervisorTemplateAdapter.java:324) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl.deleteTemplate(TemplateManagerImpl.java:1080) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.template.DeleteTemplateCmd.execute(DeleteTemplateCmd.java:112) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:158) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:531) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724) Caused by: com.cloud.utils.fsm.NoTransitionException: Unable to transition to a new state from Creating via DestroyRequested at com.cloud.utils.fsm.StateMachine2.getNextState(StateMachine2.java:83) at com.cloud.utils.fsm.StateMachine2.transitTo(StateMachine2.java:100) at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.ObjectInDataStoreManagerImpl.update(ObjectInDataStoreManagerImpl.java:301) at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject.processEvent(TemplateObject.java:162) ... 22 more Any clues ? Thanks for your help. Regards, Benoit.
Re: Review Request 14522: [CLOUDSTACK-4771] Support Revert VM Disk from Snapshot
John, Will you be able to take a look at this revision soon? It is a small change to address your comments so it should not take very long. Thanks, Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.commailto:chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco Red Hat On Oct 17, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.commailto:chris.su...@netapp.com wrote: This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/ Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle, edison su, John Burwell, and Mike Tutkowski. By Chris Suich. Updated Oct. 17, 2013, 6:46 p.m. Changes -Added context to the error messages for not finding DataMotionStrategies. However, it appears that the place where pickStrategy() is called for SnapshotStrategies is not able to actually throw error messages. I will open a separate issue for this. -Added TODOs for DRYing out the overloaded pickStrategy() methods. -Added context to the error message for failing to find the image store snapshot info for a snapshot response. However, this also is unable to throw a meaning full error message as the exception would be caught and replaced with a generic error. I will create a separate issue for this as well. Repository: cloudstack-git Description After the last batch of work to the revertSnapshot API, SnapshotServiceImpl was not tied into the workflow to be used by storage providers. I have added the logic in a similar fashion to takeSnapshot(), backupSnapshot() and deleteSnapshot(). I have also added a 'Revert to Snapshot' action to the volume snapshots list in the UI. Testing I have tested all of this locally with a custom storage provider. Unfortunately, I'm still in the middle of figuring out how to properly unit test this type of code. If anyone has any recommendations, please let me know. Diffs (updated) * engine/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/subsystem/api/storage/StrategyPriority.java (81034b1) * engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/DataMotionServiceImpl.java (2d31320) * server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java (f4ca112) * server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java (dade983) View Diffhttps://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/diff/
Re: Review Request 14522: [CLOUDSTACK-4771] Support Revert VM Disk from Snapshot
Chris, I am in-transit to CloudConnect. I will try to review the latest patch by COB today (21 Oct 2013). Thanks, -John On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:31 AM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com wrote: John, Will you be able to take a look at this revision soon? It is a small change to address your comments so it should not take very long. Thanks, Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco Red Hat On Oct 17, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com wrote: This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/ Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle, edison su, John Burwell, and Mike Tutkowski. By Chris Suich. *Updated Oct. 17, 2013, 6:46 p.m.* Changes -Added context to the error messages for not finding DataMotionStrategies. However, it appears that the place where pickStrategy() is called for SnapshotStrategies is not able to actually throw error messages. I will open a separate issue for this. -Added TODOs for DRYing out the overloaded pickStrategy() methods. -Added context to the error message for failing to find the image store snapshot info for a snapshot response. However, this also is unable to throw a meaning full error message as the exception would be caught and replaced with a generic error. I will create a separate issue for this as well. *Repository: *cloudstack-git Description After the last batch of work to the revertSnapshot API, SnapshotServiceImpl was not tied into the workflow to be used by storage providers. I have added the logic in a similar fashion to takeSnapshot(), backupSnapshot() and deleteSnapshot(). I have also added a 'Revert to Snapshot' action to the volume snapshots list in the UI. Testing I have tested all of this locally with a custom storage provider. Unfortunately, I'm still in the middle of figuring out how to properly unit test this type of code. If anyone has any recommendations, please let me know. Diffs (updated) - engine/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/subsystem/api/storage/StrategyPriority.java (81034b1) - engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/DataMotionServiceImpl.java (2d31320) - server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java (f4ca112) - server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java (dade983) View Diff https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/diff/
RE: [Discuss] Donation of RDP client code
Are we looking good with the donation code and can we make progress to get this code into a private branch? Thanks, RamG -Original Message- From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] Sent: 21 October 2013 18:37 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [Discuss] Donation of RDP client code Hi Wei ZHOU, Thank you for your positive feedback. Adding the console to the systemVM would happen after a donation, because we would want to do the integration in public. Therefore, it would be premature to contact Hugo about his system VM work. DL -Original Message- From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 October 2013 18:15 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [Discuss] Donation of RDP client code It looks very nice. Thanks! Hugo are working on the refactor of systemvm. Maybe it need to be modified. 2013/10/17 Donal Lafferty donal.laffe...@citrix.com This donation addresses our need for an RDP client free of IP restrictions that can be included with Apache CloudStack's console VM. RDP is of interest, because Hyper-V exposes VM consoles over RDP. However, Apache CloudStack does not have an RDP client that is easy to build, can easily run in the console VM, and has no IP dependencies. The donated code addresses this gap. The source is for an all-Java solution, which meets the console VM's expectations of a Java-based renderer. A Maven pom.xml is included that can be incorporated in the Apache CloudStack build. Finally, the code has no significant IP dependencies. Only JUnit 3.8.1 (Common Public License Version 1.0) and tomcat-embed-core 7.0.30 (Apache License, Version 2.03) are referenced by the pom.xml. No third party Java code is used or included. The client's source is in the diff attached to the Review Board submission https://reviews.apache.org/r/14701/ This submission includes technical details in the description field. The code was developed for Citrix Systems by a contractor. Note that the client still has to be integrated with console system VM. However, it makes more sense to do this after we're certain that the client will go into ACS. Please have a look, all opinions welcome!
Review Request 14782: [CLOUDSTACK-4910] Take VM snapshot instantly returns success regardless of actual result
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14782/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Fixed a typo causing vm snapshot requests to always instantly return successful in the CloudStack UI. Diffs - ui/scripts/instances.js 41d1772 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14782/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Chris Suich
Review Request 14783: [CLOUDSTACK-4844] Docs show incorrect URL for Windows password reset service download
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14783/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-docs Description --- (Section 12.13.2) Removes the windows MSI link from the linux section and corrects the MSI link in the windows section. Diffs - en-US/linux-installation.xml 14a2f51 en-US/windows-installation.xml bcecc80 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14783/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Travis Graham
Review Request 14784: [CLOUDSTACK-4805] Installation instructions drops support for Ubuntu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14784/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-docs Description --- (section 4.5.7.2) reflect steps for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu. Diffs - en-US/nfs-shares-on-management-server.xml 881ca8d Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14784/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Travis Graham
Review Request 14785: [CLOUDSTACK-4692] Release notes refer to componentsContext.xml instead of componentContext.xml
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14785/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-docs Description --- Corrects the two references in Release Notes. Diffs - release-notes/en-US/Release_Notes.xml a65cca9 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14785/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Travis Graham
Review Request 14786: [CLOUDSTACK-4609] [doc] Review Comments on Dedicated Resources: POD, CLUSTER
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14786/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-docs Description --- (sections 2.3 and 2.4) Updated references to organization unit within CloudStack for Pods and Clusters Diffs - en-US/about-clusters.xml d2f0220 en-US/about-pods.xml 57ae1a3 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14786/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Travis Graham
Re: contrail virtual network controller
Prasana, On Oct 2, 2013, at 9:18 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:18:29AM -0700, Pedro Roque Marques wrote: We have an integration test which requires spawning a mysql db, initialize it and then go through the process of creating a zone, etc. This allows us to test the plugin against the API. The drawback is that this test takes a bit to spawn the mysql db... Does anyone have a recipe to run against an in-memory database for testing purposes ? Does the mysqldb contain fixture data from when contrail is deployed on a cloudstack cloud? I presume then the integration test can run without the contrail device added to cloudstack? mysql is required for the *Dao objects necessary to simulate zone create, physical network and guest network creation. The contrail API server is being mocked. -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: [ASF4.2.1] Progress
Hi, I posted a question on dev Friday regarding Cloudstack-4828. This was broken between 4.1 and 4.2. What is the corrrect process to get this in the queue for 4.2.1. Thanks for all the great work all of you have put in to this. Patrick On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com wrote: With active help of community and dedicated engineers from Citrix we have made some tremendous progress in fixing blockers and criticals targeted for this maintenance release. In last two weeks around 70 tickets were resolved (~38 blockers and criticals). There are roughly 15 criticals/blockers ticket open now. Our target is to be code complete early this week and we are on our way to meet it. A timely maintenance release will also help the next big release. -abhi
Re: Review Request 14549: Rename net.juniper.contrail to org.apache.cloudstack.network.contrail
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14549/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 4:39 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes --- Patch created by git format-patch on a new local branch tracking origin/master with the contrail plugin changes merged. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Rename net.juniper.contrail to org.apache.cloudstack.network.contrail. Diffs (updated) - api/src/com/cloud/network/Network.java 49f380b client/pom.xml fd1f13a client/tomcatconf/applicationContext.xml.in 6dda5c7 client/tomcatconf/applicationContext.xml.in 0ab2515 client/tomcatconf/commands.properties.in 58c770d client/tomcatconf/componentContext.xml.in df5b002 client/tomcatconf/componentContext.xml.in 157ad5a plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java 92fbab2 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/pom.xml PRE-CREATION plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/pom.xml 60ce059 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/api/command/CreateServiceInstanceCmd.java PRE-CREATION plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/api/command/CreateServiceInstanceCmd.java 9a84d31 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/api/command/CreateServiceInstanceCmd.java 92f5eeb plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/api/response/ServiceInstanceResponse.java PRE-CREATION plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/api/response/ServiceInstanceResponse.java 00fe7d3 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/api/response/ServiceInstanceResponse.java 1b7a7d8 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailElement.java PRE-CREATION plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailElement.java bd2bdbc plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailElement.java 885a60f plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailElementImpl.java PRE-CREATION plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailElementImpl.java d407edd plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailElementImpl.java 3a38020 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailGuru.java PRE-CREATION plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailGuru.java d77 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailGuru.java c655b0b plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailManager.java PRE-CREATION plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailManager.java c517660 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailManager.java 5195793 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailManagerImpl.java PRE-CREATION plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailManagerImpl.java 271b016 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ContrailManagerImpl.java 8a3ca1b plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/DBSyncGeneric.java PRE-CREATION plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/DBSyncGeneric.java 54e2e14 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/DBSyncGeneric.java d169b37 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/EventUtils.java PRE-CREATION plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/EventUtils.java 445a2cf plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/EventUtils.java acd1bed plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ManagementNetworkGuru.java PRE-CREATION plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ManagementNetworkGuru.java 3c23016 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ManagementNetworkGuru.java bad2502 plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ModelDatabase.java PRE-CREATION plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ModelDatabase.java 90c67cc plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/net/juniper/contrail/management/ModelDatabase.java f9e7c24
Re: Review Request 14305: CLOUDSTACK-4493: registerSSHKeyPair API doc contains wrong API response (private key)
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/#review27250 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Koushik Das On Oct. 21, 2013, 5:14 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 5:14 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4493 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4493 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-4493: registerSSHKeyPair API doc contains wrong API response (private key) Changing the response object of register and list ssh keypairs APIs Diffs - api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/ssh/CreateSSHKeyPairCmd.java 56bec7e api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/CreateSSHKeyPairResponse.java PRE-CREATION api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java 2791853 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Harikrishna Patnala
RE: Incomplete API docs?
Filed as CLOUDSTACK-4912. -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:22 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Incomplete API docs? Yes - it's really a bug in ApiXmlDocWriter. Please file it. --David On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Demetrius Tsitrelis demetrius.tsitre...@citrix.com wrote: Do you still think there needs to be a bug filed for the missing APIs? -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 1:21 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Incomplete API docs? +1 Radhika on the 4.3 release page I have solicited volunteers for different release activities. Looks like the high level tasks could use a better breakdown, do you want to take a stab at breaking doc into sub tasks and folks interested can fill in their name. Animesh -Original Message- From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Incomplete API docs? Hi All, Our API documentation requires a serious refurbishment. How about creating a doc sprint for enhancing API documentation ? I am in the process of setting up a Wiki page at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Documentation+ S pr int+for+Enhancing+API+Documentation to track this activity. Feel free int+for+Enhancing+API+to add/ edit/ remove the page content. I request all of you to volunteer so that we will have a comprehensive API doc set by next release. Appreciate your feedback. Regards -Radhika -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 7:36 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Incomplete API docs? Demetrius do you mind creating an issue in JIRA? -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 5:15 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Incomplete API docs? The commands.xml generated as a result of mvn build (mvn clean install - P developer,systemvm -DskipTests), doesn't include the commands mentioned by Demetrius. Looks like some regression bug in ApiXmlDocWriter - it used to include all the commands in 3.0.x version of the code. -Alena. From: Demetrius Tsitrelis dtsitre...@live.commailto:dtsitre...@live.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 4:33 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Incomplete API docs? I grep'ed the source code and came up with a list of the APIs which the UI uses. That list is at the end of this message. You can see that many of them (addNetscalerLoadBalancer, addVmwareDc, etc.) are not in the generated API documentation which appears at http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/TOC_Root_Admin.ht m l Is this something wrong with the input files or is a tool at fault? Here's the list of APIs used by the UI: activateProject addAccountToProject addBaremetalDhcp addBaremetalPxeKickStartServer addCluster addHost addImageStore addIpToNic addLdapConfiguration addNetscalerLoadBalancer addNetworkServiceProvider addNicToVirtualMachine addRegion addTrafficType addUcsManager addVmwareDc addVpnUser archiveAlerts archiveEvents assignToGlobalLoadBalancerRule assignToLoadBalancerRule assignVirtualMachine associateIpAddress associateUcsProfileToBlade attachIso attachVolume authorizeSecurityGroupEgress authorizeSecurityGroupIngress cancelHostMaintenance cancelStorageMaintenance configureInternalLoadBalancerElement configureVirtualRouterElement copyIso copyTemplate createAccount createAffinityGroup createAutoScalePolicy createAutoScaleVmGroup createAutoScaleVmProfile createCondition createDiskOffering createDomain createEgressFirewallRule createFirewallRule createGlobalLoadBalancerRule createIpForwardingRule createLBHealthCheckPolicy createLBStickinessPolicy createLoadBalancer createLoadBalancerRule createNetwork createNetworkACL createNetworkACLList createNetworkOffering createPhysicalNetwork createPod createPortableIpRange createPortForwardingRule createPrivateGateway createProject createRemoteAccessVpn createSecondaryStagingStore createSecurityGroup createServiceOffering createSnapshot createSnapshotPolicy createStaticRoute createStorageNetworkIpRange createStoragePool createTags
Re: Review Request 14782: [CLOUDSTACK-4910] Take VM snapshot instantly returns success regardless of actual result
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14782/#review27252 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Federle On Oct. 21, 2013, 3:27 p.m., Chris Suich wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14782/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 3:27 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Fixed a typo causing vm snapshot requests to always instantly return successful in the CloudStack UI. Diffs - ui/scripts/instances.js 41d1772 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14782/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Chris Suich
Re: Review Request 14782: [CLOUDSTACK-4910] Take VM snapshot instantly returns success regardless of actual result
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14782/#review27253 --- Commit 5c5326f6f710932afc121fd2528681933c716bdc in branch refs/heads/master from Chris Suich [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=5c5326f ] CLOUDSTACK-4910 Fixed issue with Take VM Snapshot UI always returning success - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Oct. 21, 2013, 3:27 p.m., Chris Suich wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14782/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 3:27 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Fixed a typo causing vm snapshot requests to always instantly return successful in the CloudStack UI. Diffs - ui/scripts/instances.js 41d1772 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14782/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Chris Suich
[VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack
As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of source for an RDP client. After donation, the client would be integrated with the console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V based VMs. The client's source is in the diff attached to the Review Board submission https://reviews.apache.org/r/14701/ [1] http://markmail.org/thread/q6sfqrhosmirm3bg I would like to call a vote here, so that we have a formal consensus on accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted into a branch, and then we work through any technical concerns / reviews / changes prior to a master branch merge. VOTING will be left open for 72 hours. This is a technical decision, which means committer and PMC votes are binding. DL
[ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats Animesh! Cheers, Hugo On 21 okt. 2013, at 20:01, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand
Hey Marcus, Just wanted to let you know the branch of mine that has your code and mine appears to work well with regards to attaching a data disk to a running VM: fdisk -l from hypervisor: http://i.imgur.com/NkP5fo0.png fdisk -l from within VM: http://i.imgur.com/8YwiiC7.png I plan to do more testing on this over the coming days. If all goes well, perhaps we can check this code in by the end of the week? Talk to you later, Mike On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Don't ask me, but it works now (I've been having this trouble quite a while today). I guess the trick is to send you an e-mail. :) On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote: Did you create a service offering that uses local storage, or add a shared primary storage? By default there is no storage that matches the built in offerings. On Oct 20, 2013 9:39 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hey Marcus, So, I went back to the branch of mine that has your code and mine and was able to create a new CloudStack install from scratch with it (once again, after manually deleting what was in /var/lib/libvirt/images to the get system VMs to start). Anyways, my system VMs are running now and I tried to kick off a VM using the CentOS 6.3 image you provided me a while back. The virtual router has a Status of Running; however, my VM fails to start (with the generic message of Insufficient Capacity). I've not seen this exception before (related to the VR). Do you have any insight into this?: com.cloud.exception.ResourceUnavailableException: Resource [Pod:1] is unreachable: Unable to apply userdata and password entry on router at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyRules(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3793) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyUserData(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3017) at com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement.addPasswordAndUserdata(VirtualRouterElement.java:933) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepareElement(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1172) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepareNic(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1288) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepare(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1224) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:826) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:508) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VMEntityManagerImpl.deployVirtualMachine(VMEntityManagerImpl.java:227) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VirtualMachineEntityImpl.deploy(VirtualMachineEntityImpl.java:209) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:3338) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:2919) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:2905) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DeployVMCmd.execute(DeployVMCmd.java:421) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:161) at com.cloud.api.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.runJobInContext(ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.java:109) at com.cloud.api.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher$1.run(ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.java:66) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at com.cloud.api.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.runJob(ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.java:63) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:532) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congratulations! 2013/10/21 Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congratulations, Animesh! On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote: Congratulations! 2013/10/21 Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™*
Re: [Discuss] Donation of RDP client code
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Donal Lafferty donal.laffe...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Ram, The next step is to have the community decide on the donation. Therefore, I have sent out an email to kick off the VOTE for accepting the code into a separate branch from master. DL Awesome. Thanks Donal. That's exactly what I was going to ask you to do!
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats Animesh. Your contributions to 4.2 were tremendous... Looking forward to more great things! On Oct 21, 2013 12:06 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
Can't add shared network with public IPs
Hello CloudStack community, Could you please help me investigate following issue. I am tring to add new network in CloudStack4.1 with vmware via API call. For doing this I have use: - DefaultSharedNetworkOffering - public IP address range - api call http://cs-manage41.ourdomain.com:8080/client/api? command=createNetwork gateway=xx.xxx.xxx.1 netmask=255.255.255.0 displaytext=CS_Default_network name=CS networkofferingid=eedfa08e-c2a2-4392-b561-45b1a7dd9968 zoneid=ddefc1dd-187a-4849-94d6-ac0466b905bd cidr=xx.xxx.xxx.0/24 vlan=3 apiKey=i1HtdAADSs4P5fMyGmPTPdpmtcHUtXRNnDdCaxepBm9n3URrpdYWehzXO85qI5l3MMcG_9UW8MkWgU6vn39UdA sessionkey=4ruxkWEF6PSRaxrrUVoGBq0bH1M%3D_=1382752053469 Network was successfully added. But when I go to: CloudStack GI -- Network -- click on created network -- View IP Addresses -- Acquire New IP I get error: The owner of the network is not the same as owner of the IP 2013-10-21 15:26:05,824 ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-4:job-30) Unexpected exception while executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.address.AssociateIPAddrCmd com.cloud.exception.InvalidParameterValueException: The owner of the network is not the same as owner of the IP at com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.associateIPToGuestNetwork(NetworkManagerImpl.java:744) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.network.NetworkServiceImpl.associateIPToNetwork(NetworkServiceImpl.java:2852) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.address.AssociateIPAddrCmd.execute(AssociateIPAddrCmd.java:244) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:162) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:437) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) Thank you! -- Best regards, Denis Finko System Administrator, SA Ecommerce corporation www.ecommerce.com
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats, Animesh! -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco Red Hat On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats Animesh. Your contributions to 4.2 were tremendous... Looking forward to more great things! On Oct 21, 2013 12:06 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats, Animesh. -min On 10/21/13 12:01 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
Re: KVM systemvm not getting IP
Can someone explain why CS tries to load PremiumSecondaryStorageResource on a LXC zone? 2013-10-21 15:37:16,697 DEBUG [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) VmWare hypervisor configured, telling the ssvm to load the PremiumSecondaryStorageResource I don't even have a VMWare zone anymore in my setup I am still having issues with my SSVM/CPVM being killed. Do I need to update anything on the systemvm image itself if I use non-oss? Francois On 10/15/2013, 5:12 PM, Francois Gaudreault wrote: Interesting. We built our CS with noredist (nonoss). So I should spin the KVM VM image, update the ISO on it, and then recreate the image? Did I understand you properly? Thanks! Francois On 10/15/2013, 5:10 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: This has to do with how your cloudstack was built. Are you using community provided packages? It's looking for the VMWare secondary storage service, which isn't running. I forget exactly how to fix it, but it's something to do with compiling as '-Dnonoss' or '-Dnoredist'. Something like that. After that you need to reinstall the packages so that the systemvm.iso gets updated to the new code you compiled. On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com wrote: Apparently, the cloud agent is not able to run on the version of the systemvm I have. This one: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 The error is : 2013-10-15 20:39:25,195 ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Unable to start agent: Resource class not found: com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource due to: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource After couple time, the VM is killed by CloudStack. I should precise I am running an LXC zone (I understand this type requires the KVM image for systemvm). Francois On 10/12/2013, 10:13 AM, Francois Gaudreault wrote: I got the new template, and the VMs are having IPs now. One thing fixed :) My other problem is regarding libvirt/qemu. My VMs are killed randomly :S Francois On 10/11/2013, 10:23 PM, Rajesh Battala wrote: Acton template won't work. In 4.2 there is a new template. You can check it by checking the release version of it. 4.2 systemvm is generated from debian wheezy. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 9:48 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: KVM systemvm not getting IP Hmm... How do I know if I am using the old or new :P I downloaded this one: http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2 FG On 10/11/2013, 12:12 PM, Rajesh Battala wrote: Hi Francois, Are you using the new systemvm template. System vm's ip's info (boot args) are passed via socket in 4.2. Please check whether you are using new or old systemvm template. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 8:30 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: KVM systemvm not getting IP Anyone faced an issue where the KVM system VM doesn't set IPs on the network interfaces? In fact there is no interfaces definitions in /etc/network/interfaces. I am using CS 4.2. I re-installed my host to use Ubuntu 13.04 (I have the same behavior on CentOS 6). -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_ -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_ -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_ -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Awesome! Congrats, Animesh. David La Motta Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp Direct: 1.919.476.5042 On 10/21/13 3:01 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats Animesh. On 21/10/13 12:51 PM, La Motta, David david.lamo...@netapp.com wrote: Awesome! Congrats, Animesh. David La Motta Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp Direct: 1.919.476.5042 On 10/21/13 3:01 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
LXC and SSVM/CPVM on the host
Ok I think we have to look at this further. I'll stop hijacking other
threads.
I am trying to get the SSVM/CPVM to run on a LXC host. The SSVM/CPVM
starts, get IPs, but then CloudStack kill them for some reason. Yes, I
use the 4.2 images :
2013-10-21 16:19:21,605 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-9:null) SeqA 73--1: Processing Seq 73--1: { Cmd ,
MgmtId: -1, via: 73, Ver: v1, Flags: 111,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.ShutdownCommand:{reason:sig.kill,wait:0}}] }
2013-10-21 16:19:21,605 INFO [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-9:null) Host 73 has informed us that it is
shutting down with reason sig.kill and detail null
2013-10-21 16:19:21,606 INFO [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-11:null) Host 73 is disconnecting with event
ShutdownRequested
2013-10-21 16:19:21,609 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-11:null) The next status of agent 73is Disconnected,
current status is Up
2013-10-21 16:19:21,609 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-11:null) Deregistering link for 73 with state Disconnected
2013-10-21 16:19:21,609 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-11:null) Remove Agent : 73
2013-10-21 16:19:21,609 DEBUG [agent.manager.ConnectedAgentAttache]
(AgentTaskPool-11:null) Processing Disconnect.
I transferred the host to KVM, and now the same SSVM/CPVM images are
running fine for the last 30min ( so I assume it works fine...).
Something seems to be wrong with the LXC side :S
Anyone wants to invest some time to troubleshoot? I'll open a ticket also.
--
Francois Gaudreault
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
514-629-6775
- - -
CloudOps
420 rue Guy
Montréal QC H3J 1S6
www.cloudops.com
@CloudOps_
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats Animesh! -Original Message- From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 1:09 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi Congrats Animesh. On 21/10/13 12:51 PM, La Motta, David david.lamo...@netapp.com wrote: Awesome! Congrats, Animesh. David La Motta Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp Direct: 1.919.476.5042 On 10/21/13 3:01 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats Animesh! You deserve it! -Original Message- From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:24 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi Congrats Animesh! -Original Message- From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 1:09 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi Congrats Animesh. On 21/10/13 12:51 PM, La Motta, David david.lamo...@netapp.com wrote: Awesome! Congrats, Animesh. David La Motta Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp Direct: 1.919.476.5042 On 10/21/13 3:01 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
[Merge]pluggable_vm_snapshot branch
Hi All,
Per discussion on the thread: http://markmail.org/message/ybw2yy5snkvkuc57,
we decide to use coarse-graind interface to make taking vm snapshot pluggable.
On pluggable_vm_snapshot, a new interface is added:
public interface VMSnapshotStrategy {
VMSnapshot takeVMSnapshot(VMSnapshot vmSnapshot);
boolean deleteVMSnapshot(VMSnapshot vmSnapshot);
boolean revertVMSnapshot(VMSnapshot vmSnapshot);
boolean canHandle(VMSnapshot vmSnapshot);
}
Any vendor can implement this interface to customize vm snapshot procedure.
Unit test is added.
If no objection, I'd like to merge it into master. Comments/feedback are
welcome, thanks!
RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack
+1 -Original Message- From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 11:12 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of source for an RDP client. After donation, the client would be integrated with the console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V based VMs. The client's source is in the diff attached to the Review Board submission https://reviews.apache.org/r/14701/ [1] http://markmail.org/thread/q6sfqrhosmirm3bg I would like to call a vote here, so that we have a formal consensus on accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted into a branch, and then we work through any technical concerns / reviews / changes prior to a master branch merge. VOTING will be left open for 72 hours. This is a technical decision, which means committer and PMC votes are binding. DL
Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand
Hey Marcus, So...now that this works well for data disks, I was wondering what might be involved in getting this process to work for root disks. Can you point me in the right direction as far as what gets invoked when a VM is being created on KVM (so that its root disk can be created and the necessary template laid down or ISO installed)? Thanks! On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hey Marcus, Just wanted to let you know the branch of mine that has your code and mine appears to work well with regards to attaching a data disk to a running VM: fdisk -l from hypervisor: http://i.imgur.com/NkP5fo0.png fdisk -l from within VM: http://i.imgur.com/8YwiiC7.png I plan to do more testing on this over the coming days. If all goes well, perhaps we can check this code in by the end of the week? Talk to you later, Mike On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Don't ask me, but it works now (I've been having this trouble quite a while today). I guess the trick is to send you an e-mail. :) On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote: Did you create a service offering that uses local storage, or add a shared primary storage? By default there is no storage that matches the built in offerings. On Oct 20, 2013 9:39 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hey Marcus, So, I went back to the branch of mine that has your code and mine and was able to create a new CloudStack install from scratch with it (once again, after manually deleting what was in /var/lib/libvirt/images to the get system VMs to start). Anyways, my system VMs are running now and I tried to kick off a VM using the CentOS 6.3 image you provided me a while back. The virtual router has a Status of Running; however, my VM fails to start (with the generic message of Insufficient Capacity). I've not seen this exception before (related to the VR). Do you have any insight into this?: com.cloud.exception.ResourceUnavailableException: Resource [Pod:1] is unreachable: Unable to apply userdata and password entry on router at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyRules(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3793) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyUserData(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3017) at com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement.addPasswordAndUserdata(VirtualRouterElement.java:933) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepareElement(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1172) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepareNic(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1288) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepare(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1224) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:826) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:508) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VMEntityManagerImpl.deployVirtualMachine(VMEntityManagerImpl.java:227) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VirtualMachineEntityImpl.deploy(VirtualMachineEntityImpl.java:209) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:3338) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:2919) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:2905) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DeployVMCmd.execute(DeployVMCmd.java:421) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:161) at com.cloud.api.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.runJobInContext(ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.java:109) at com.cloud.api.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher$1.run(ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.java:66) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at com.cloud.api.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.runJob(ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.java:63) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:532) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at
Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand
Do you have the capability to clone the root disk? Normally the template is installed to primary, and then cloned for each root disk. In some cases (such as CLVM), this isn't efficient and so the template is copied fresh to populate each root disk. I'm actually not 100% sure how this works in the new code. It used to be handled by copyPhysicalDisk in the storage adaptor, called by copyTemplateToPrimaryStorage, which runs on the agent. It would pass template/secondary storage info, and the destination volume/primary storage info, and copyPhysicalDisk would do the work of installing the image to the destination. Then subsequent root disks would be cloned in CreateCommand by calling createDiskFromTemplate. In master it looks like this was moved to KVMStorageProcessor 'cloneVolumeFromBaseTemplate', although I think this just takes over as default, and there's something in your storage driver that should be capable of cloning templates on the mgmt server side. I'm less sure about how the template gets to primary storage in the first place, I assume copyTemplateToPrimaryStorage in KVMStorageProcessor calling copyPhysicalDisk in your adaptor. It's a bit tough for me to tell since our earlier storage adaptor did everything on the host it mostly just worked with the default stuff. On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hey Marcus, So...now that this works well for data disks, I was wondering what might be involved in getting this process to work for root disks. Can you point me in the right direction as far as what gets invoked when a VM is being created on KVM (so that its root disk can be created and the necessary template laid down or ISO installed)? Thanks! On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hey Marcus, Just wanted to let you know the branch of mine that has your code and mine appears to work well with regards to attaching a data disk to a running VM: fdisk -l from hypervisor: http://i.imgur.com/NkP5fo0.png fdisk -l from within VM: http://i.imgur.com/8YwiiC7.png I plan to do more testing on this over the coming days. If all goes well, perhaps we can check this code in by the end of the week? Talk to you later, Mike On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Don't ask me, but it works now (I've been having this trouble quite a while today). I guess the trick is to send you an e-mail. :) On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Did you create a service offering that uses local storage, or add a shared primary storage? By default there is no storage that matches the built in offerings. On Oct 20, 2013 9:39 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hey Marcus, So, I went back to the branch of mine that has your code and mine and was able to create a new CloudStack install from scratch with it (once again, after manually deleting what was in /var/lib/libvirt/images to the get system VMs to start). Anyways, my system VMs are running now and I tried to kick off a VM using the CentOS 6.3 image you provided me a while back. The virtual router has a Status of Running; however, my VM fails to start (with the generic message of Insufficient Capacity). I've not seen this exception before (related to the VR). Do you have any insight into this?: com.cloud.exception.ResourceUnavailableException: Resource [Pod:1] is unreachable: Unable to apply userdata and password entry on router at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyRules(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3793) at com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyUserData(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3017) at com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement.addPasswordAndUserdata(VirtualRouterElement.java:933) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepareElement(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1172) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepareNic(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1288) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.NetworkOrchestrator.prepare(NetworkOrchestrator.java:1224) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:826) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:508) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VMEntityManagerImpl.deployVirtualMachine(VMEntityManagerImpl.java:227) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VirtualMachineEntityImpl.deploy(VirtualMachineEntityImpl.java:209) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:3338) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:2919) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:2905) at
access instance's console using apikey failed
I compiled cloudstack 4.1.1 source code in cygwin, then test it using
jetty, it works fine. But, when I access instance's console through vnc
using apikey, it fails, the browser shows the follow message:
Access denied. Invalid web session or API key in request
my url:
http://localhost:8080/client/console?cmd=accessvm=b194369f-e0d4-45d8-a50f-09ec51095e68apikey=fmS7oyThP6MGxN5X_CgeOCxQIqgTu5QFDz46r2Pv5kLp88EYYBquSu6_3s3d9MXdbUHPpxj5qDDy1jvhEpQWvQsignature=y3dNHn580NJiCVRGwrBTR4JHImo%3D
I test the listAccounts api, it's ok.
my url:
http://localhost:8080/client/api?command=listAccountsapikey=fmS7oyThP6MGxN5X_CgeOCxQIqgTu5QFDz46r2Pv5kLp88EYYBquSu6_3s3d9MXdbUHPpxj5qDDy1jvhEpQWvQsignature=ALhJtw%2Bzi7Rcmo%2Bkk3xH3cTJgp4%3D
then, I debug the source code, find where it fails.
file: ConsoleProxyServlet.java
private boolean verifyRequest(MapString, Object[] requestParameters) {
try {
...
...
unsignedRequest = unsignedRequest.toLowerCase();
Mac mac = Mac.getInstance(HmacSHA1);
SecretKeySpec keySpec = new SecretKeySpec(secretKey.getBytes(),
HmacSHA1);
mac.init(keySpec);
mac.update(unsignedRequest.getBytes());
byte[] encryptedBytes = mac.doFinal();
String computedSignature =
Base64.encodeBase64URLSafeString(encryptedBytes);
boolean equalSig = signature.equals(computedSignature);
if (!equalSig) {
s_logger.debug(User signature: + signature + is not equaled to
computed signature: + computedSignature);
}
...
...
return equalSig;
} catch (Exception ex) {
s_logger.error(unable to verifty request signature, ex);
}
return false;
}
in this method, signature not equals to computedSignature, so it returns
false
then, I view ApiServer.java，the verifyRequest method:
public boolean verifyRequest(MapString, Object[] requestParameters, Long
userId) throws ServerApiException {
try {
...
...
unsignedRequest = unsignedRequest.toLowerCase();
Mac mac = Mac.getInstance(HmacSHA1);
SecretKeySpec keySpec = new SecretKeySpec(secretKey.getBytes(),
HmacSHA1);
mac.init(keySpec);
mac.update(unsignedRequest.getBytes());
byte[] encryptedBytes = mac.doFinal();
String computedSignature = Base64.encodeBase64String(encryptedBytes);
boolean equalSig = signature.equals(computedSignature);
if (!equalSig) {
s_logger.debug(User signature: + signature + is not equaled to
computed signature: + computedSignature);
}
...
...
return equalSig;
} catch (Exception ex) {
s_logger.error(unable to verifty request signature, ex);
}
return false;
}
these two verifyRequest method produce different signature, because the
former use :
String computedSignature =
Base64.encodeBase64URLSafeString(encryptedBytes);
while the later use:
String computedSignature = Base64.encodeBase64String(encryptedBytes);
this is why listAccouts works fine, but vnc console is failed.
when I replace Base64.encodeBase64URLSafeString by
Base64.encodeBase64String, vnc console is ok too.
so I am confused, why use different encode method? It is a bug?
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats, Animesh! On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.orgwrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC -- 千葉 豪 Go Chiba E-mail:go.ch...@gmail.com
Review Request 14823: Refactor StrategyPriority
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14823/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chris Suich and edison su. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- I specifically ran into a problem in the spring modularization branch with StrategyPriority.sortStrategies(). The lists of strategies are unmodifiable collections so Collection.sort() can not be used. I went to do a quick fix for this but then decided to try remove the duplicated logic in each code that needs a SnapshotStrategy or DataMotionStrategy and then ended up refactoring quite a bit. Diffs - engine/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/subsystem/api/storage/DataMotionStrategy.java 950f9e2 engine/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/subsystem/api/storage/SnapshotStrategy.java e4cecb6 engine/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/subsystem/api/storage/StorageStrategyFactory.java PRE-CREATION engine/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/subsystem/api/storage/StrategyPriority.java 81034b1 engine/api/test/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/subsystem/api/storage/StrategyPriorityTest.java 3d75279 engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/AncientDataMotionStrategy.java 5f5f01e engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/DataMotionServiceImpl.java 2d31320 engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java 6a874d6 engine/storage/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/helper/StorageStrategyFactoryImpl.java PRE-CREATION engine/storage/test/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/subsystem/api/storage/StrategyPriorityTest.java PRE-CREATION plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/XenServerStorageMotionStrategy.java 8578a9a server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java dade983 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14823/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Darren Shepherd
Re: Review Request 14305: CLOUDSTACK-4493: registerSSHKeyPair API doc contains wrong API response (private key)
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/#review27274 --- Commit f9731144cda4d7982cc4be1e60c1e4aa3b3ca2e2 in branch refs/heads/4.2 from Harikrishna Patnala [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=f973114 ] CLOUDSTACK-4493: registerSSHKeyPair API doc contains wrong API response (private key) Changing the response object of register and list ssh keypairs APIs Signed-off-by: Koushik Das kous...@apache.org - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Oct. 21, 2013, 5:14 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 5:14 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4493 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4493 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-4493: registerSSHKeyPair API doc contains wrong API response (private key) Changing the response object of register and list ssh keypairs APIs Diffs - api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/ssh/CreateSSHKeyPairCmd.java 56bec7e api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/CreateSSHKeyPairResponse.java PRE-CREATION api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java 2791853 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Harikrishna Patnala
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats, Animesh! On 22-Oct-2013, at 8:55 AM, Go Chiba go.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats, Animesh! On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.orgwrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC -- 千葉 豪 Go Chiba E-mail:go.ch...@gmail.com
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats Animesh. Regards, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: chip.child...@sungard.com [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] On Behalf Of Chip Childers Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 12:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats, Animesh. -Original Message- From: chip.child...@sungard.com [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] On Behalf Of Chip Childers Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 12:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats Animesh! -Original Message- From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] Sent: 22 October 2013 10:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi Congrats, Animesh. -Original Message- From: chip.child...@sungard.com [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] On Behalf Of Chip Childers Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 12:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand
Thanks for that info, Marcus.
By the way, I wanted to see if I could attach my volume to a VM in the
Stopped State.
The attach logic didn't trigger any exceptions; however, when I started the
VM, I received an Insufficient Capacity exception.
If I detach the volume and then start the VM, the VM starts just fine.
I noticed a problem here (in StoragePoolHostDaoImpl):
@Override
public StoragePoolHostVO findByPoolHost(long poolId, long hostId) {
SearchCriteriaStoragePoolHostVO sc = PoolHostSearch.create();
sc.setParameters(pool_id, poolId);
sc.setParameters(host_id, hostId);
return findOneIncludingRemovedBy(sc);
}
The findOneIncludingRemovedBy method returns null (the poolId is my storage
pool's ID and the hostId is the expected host ID).
I'm not sure what this method is trying to do.
I looked in the storage_pool_host_ref table (is that the correct table?)
and it only has one row, which maps the local storage pool of the KVM host
to the KVM host (which explains why no match is found for my situation).
Do you understand what this logic is trying to do?
Thanks!
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Do you have the capability to clone the root disk? Normally the
template is installed to primary, and then cloned for each root disk.
In some cases (such as CLVM), this isn't efficient and so the template
is copied fresh to populate each root disk.
I'm actually not 100% sure how this works in the new code. It used to
be handled by copyPhysicalDisk in the storage adaptor, called by
copyTemplateToPrimaryStorage, which runs on the agent. It would pass
template/secondary storage info, and the destination volume/primary
storage info, and copyPhysicalDisk would do the work of installing the
image to the destination. Then subsequent root disks would be cloned
in CreateCommand by calling createDiskFromTemplate.
In master it looks like this was moved to KVMStorageProcessor
'cloneVolumeFromBaseTemplate', although I think this just takes over
as default, and there's something in your storage driver that should
be capable of cloning templates on the mgmt server side. I'm less sure
about how the template gets to primary storage in the first place, I
assume copyTemplateToPrimaryStorage in KVMStorageProcessor calling
copyPhysicalDisk in your adaptor. It's a bit tough for me to tell
since our earlier storage adaptor did everything on the host it mostly
just worked with the default stuff.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hey Marcus,
So...now that this works well for data disks, I was wondering what might
be
involved in getting this process to work for root disks.
Can you point me in the right direction as far as what gets invoked when
a
VM is being created on KVM (so that its root disk can be created and the
necessary template laid down or ISO installed)?
Thanks!
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hey Marcus,
Just wanted to let you know the branch of mine that has your code and
mine
appears to work well with regards to attaching a data disk to a running
VM:
fdisk -l from hypervisor:
http://i.imgur.com/NkP5fo0.png
fdisk -l from within VM:
http://i.imgur.com/8YwiiC7.png
I plan to do more testing on this over the coming days.
If all goes well, perhaps we can check this code in by the end of the
week?
Talk to you later,
Mike
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Don't ask me, but it works now (I've been having this trouble quite a
while today).
I guess the trick is to send you an e-mail. :)
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Did you create a service offering that uses local storage, or add a
shared primary storage? By default there is no storage that matches
the
built in offerings.
On Oct 20, 2013 9:39 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Hey Marcus,
So, I went back to the branch of mine that has your code and mine and
was able to create a new CloudStack install from scratch with it
(once
again, after manually deleting what was in /var/lib/libvirt/images
to the
get system VMs to start).
Anyways, my system VMs are running now and I tried to kick off a VM
using the CentOS 6.3 image you provided me a while back.
The virtual router has a Status of Running; however, my VM fails to
start (with the generic message of Insufficient Capacity).
I've not seen this exception before (related to the VR). Do you have
any insight into this?:
com.cloud.exception.ResourceUnavailableException: Resource [Pod:1] is
unreachable: Unable to apply userdata and password entry on router
at
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats.. Animesh. -Original Message- From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] Sent: 22 October 2013 10:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi Congrats, Animesh. -Original Message- From: chip.child...@sungard.com [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] On Behalf Of Chip Childers Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 12:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
Re: Review Request 14305: CLOUDSTACK-4493: registerSSHKeyPair API doc contains wrong API response (private key)
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/#review27276 --- Commit 54e365d00b5ae504c59c025b37387b9c9d166422 in branch refs/heads/master from Harikrishna Patnala [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=54e365d ] CLOUDSTACK-4493: registerSSHKeyPair API doc contains wrong API response (private key) Changing the response object of register and list ssh keypairs APIs Signed-off-by: Koushik Das kous...@apache.org Conflicts: api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/ssh/CreateSSHKeyPairCmd.java - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Oct. 21, 2013, 5:14 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 5:14 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4493 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4493 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-4493: registerSSHKeyPair API doc contains wrong API response (private key) Changing the response object of register and list ssh keypairs APIs Diffs - api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/ssh/CreateSSHKeyPairCmd.java 56bec7e api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/CreateSSHKeyPairResponse.java PRE-CREATION api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java 2791853 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Harikrishna Patnala
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats Animesh. Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: chip.child...@sungard.com [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] On Behalf Of Chip Childers Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 12:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Animesh! -The CloudStack PMC
S3 API broken in 4.2
I didn't even know this feature existed until yesterday, so I thought I'd try it out, but it seems that the S3 API in CloudStack completely doesn't work in 4.2. Is it supposed to? Is this an official feature or some tech preview type thing? Darren
Re: [MERGE] txn-refactor
I plan to merge this wed morning unless I or others find issues. Darren On Oct 17, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Hugo Trippaers trip...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe just mark start() as deprecated then. Would at least put a marker for anybody writing new code that they should think again about using it. Good idea. A unit test would be really nice to have for this piece of code. Especially now we know there will be changes is this area for some time to come. The DB layer is at the core of CloudStack so a test is a real requirement here. I know there is a bunch of stuff disabled, we decided long ago to fix those tests when we would touch that bit of code, and you just hit the jackpot ;-) I wrote some tests, I'll commit them in a bit. Did you have a look at the build link? The current build for your branch appears broken. One test failure and a compile error as far as I can tell. I had no clue that build-with-branch jenkins jobs existed! That is very useful. How do I get an account to kick off jobs? I do feel stupid now looking at the build error. I had some maven projects disabled, so I forgot to update about 10 different projects. I'll fix those real quick and commit. Darren
RE: Can't add shared network with public IPs
Its because the API uses system as the user and for UI you might have used default admin user. So while creating network pass account as admin to createNetwork API. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Denis Finko [mailto:denis.fi...@ecommerce.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 1:05 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Can't add shared network with public IPs Hello CloudStack community, Could you please help me investigate following issue. I am tring to add new network in CloudStack4.1 with vmware via API call. For doing this I have use: - DefaultSharedNetworkOffering - public IP address range - api call http://cs-manage41.ourdomain.com:8080/client/api? command=createNetwork gateway=xx.xxx.xxx.1 netmask=255.255.255.0 displaytext=CS_Default_network name=CS networkofferingid=eedfa08e-c2a2-4392-b561-45b1a7dd9968 zoneid=ddefc1dd-187a-4849-94d6-ac0466b905bd cidr=xx.xxx.xxx.0/24 vlan=3 apiKey=i1HtdAADSs4P5fMyGmPTPdpmtcHUtXRNnDdCaxepBm9n3URrpdYWehzXO85qI5l3MMcG_9UW8MkWgU6vn39UdA sessionkey=4ruxkWEF6PSRaxrrUVoGBq0bH1M%3D_=1382752053469 Network was successfully added. But when I go to: CloudStack GI -- Network -- click on created network -- View IP Addresses -- Acquire New IP I get error: The owner of the network is not the same as owner of the IP 2013-10-21 15:26:05,824 ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-4:job-30) Unexpected exception while executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.address.AssociateIPAddrCmd com.cloud.exception.InvalidParameterValueException: The owner of the network is not the same as owner of the IP at com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.associateIPToGuestNetwork(NetworkManagerImpl.java:744) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.network.NetworkServiceImpl.associateIPToNetwork(NetworkServiceImpl.java:2852) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.address.AssociateIPAddrCmd.execute(AssociateIPAddrCmd.java:244) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:162) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:437) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) Thank you! -- Best regards, Denis Finko System Administrator, SA Ecommerce corporation www.ecommerce.com
Re: S3 API broken in 4.2
Yeah, it was always a tech preview kind of thing. The basic operations used to work, but since most of the available client tools (s3cmd/boto/etc) had special workarounds for odd AWS behaviors (in the return behavior), they would have a hard time working with the S3 implementation in CloudStack which was based entirely on the WSDL. On 10/21/13 10:16 PM, Darren S darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't even know this feature existed until yesterday, so I thought I'd try it out, but it seems that the S3 API in CloudStack completely doesn't work in 4.2. Is it supposed to? Is this an official feature or some tech preview type thing? Darren
Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack
+1 On 10/21/13 11:11 AM, Donal Lafferty donal.laffe...@citrix.com wrote: As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of source for an RDP client. After donation, the client would be integrated with the console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V based VMs. The client's source is in the diff attached to the Review Board submission https://reviews.apache.org/r/14701/ [1] http://markmail.org/thread/q6sfqrhosmirm3bg I would like to call a vote here, so that we have a formal consensus on accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted into a branch, and then we work through any technical concerns / reviews / changes prior to a master branch merge. VOTING will be left open for 72 hours. This is a technical decision, which means committer and PMC votes are binding. DL
Re: LXC and SSVM/CPVM on the host
As far as I understand, in an LXC scenario, the system vms are expected to
run on real hypervisors.
You can always use the QuickCloud way to not use system vms at all.
On 10/21/13 1:45 PM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
wrote:
Ok I think we have to look at this further. I'll stop hijacking other
threads.
I am trying to get the SSVM/CPVM to run on a LXC host. The SSVM/CPVM
starts, get IPs, but then CloudStack kill them for some reason. Yes, I
use the 4.2 images :
2013-10-21 16:19:21,605 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-9:null) SeqA 73--1: Processing Seq 73--1: { Cmd ,
MgmtId: -1, via: 73, Ver: v1, Flags: 111,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.ShutdownCommand:{reason:sig.kill,wait:0}}] }
2013-10-21 16:19:21,605 INFO [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-9:null) Host 73 has informed us that it is
shutting down with reason sig.kill and detail null
2013-10-21 16:19:21,606 INFO [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-11:null) Host 73 is disconnecting with event
ShutdownRequested
2013-10-21 16:19:21,609 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-11:null) The next status of agent 73is Disconnected,
current status is Up
2013-10-21 16:19:21,609 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-11:null) Deregistering link for 73 with state Disconnected
2013-10-21 16:19:21,609 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-11:null) Remove Agent : 73
2013-10-21 16:19:21,609 DEBUG [agent.manager.ConnectedAgentAttache]
(AgentTaskPool-11:null) Processing Disconnect.
I transferred the host to KVM, and now the same SSVM/CPVM images are
running fine for the last 30min ( so I assume it works fine...).
Something seems to be wrong with the LXC side :S
Anyone wants to invest some time to troubleshoot? I'll open a ticket also.
--
Francois Gaudreault
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
514-629-6775
- - -
CloudOps
420 rue Guy
Montréal QC H3J 1S6
www.cloudops.com
@CloudOps_
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats Animesh!
Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack
+1 On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Devdeep Singh devdeep.si...@citrix.comwrote: +1 -Original Message- From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 11:42 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of source for an RDP client. After donation, the client would be integrated with the console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V based VMs. The client's source is in the diff attached to the Review Board submission https://reviews.apache.org/r/14701/ [1] http://markmail.org/thread/q6sfqrhosmirm3bg I would like to call a vote here, so that we have a formal consensus on accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted into a branch, and then we work through any technical concerns / reviews / changes prior to a master branch merge. VOTING will be left open for 72 hours. This is a technical decision, which means committer and PMC votes are binding. DL
Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack
I'm +0 on this. I can't fully say if the code is correct or not. I've never used Hyper-V, so I don't think it would be wise for me to vote. Just want to show I saw this VOTE. Wido On 10/21/2013 08:11 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of source for an RDP client. After donation, the client would be integrated with the console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V based VMs. The client's source is in the diff attached to the Review Board submission https://reviews.apache.org/r/14701/ [1] http://markmail.org/thread/q6sfqrhosmirm3bg I would like to call a vote here, so that we have a formal consensus on accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted into a branch, and then we work through any technical concerns / reviews / changes prior to a master branch merge. VOTING will be left open for 72 hours. This is a technical decision, which means committer and PMC votes are binding. DL
RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack
+1 -Original Message- From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 11:42 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of source for an RDP client. After donation, the client would be integrated with the console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V based VMs. The client's source is in the diff attached to the Review Board submission https://reviews.apache.org/r/14701/ [1] http://markmail.org/thread/q6sfqrhosmirm3bg I would like to call a vote here, so that we have a formal consensus on accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted into a branch, and then we work through any technical concerns / reviews / changes prior to a master branch merge. VOTING will be left open for 72 hours. This is a technical decision, which means committer and PMC votes are binding. DL
