Re: Review Request 16086: Added a temp sleep fix for vm start command
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16086/#review29992 --- Can you add more description about why this sleep is required? or add the related JIRA bug number to the RB request. - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Dec. 6, 2013, 6:28 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16086/ --- (Updated Dec. 6, 2013, 6:28 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Added a temporary time sleep fix post a restart command. Applies to 4.2,master,4.3 Note: Has to clean other things as well and will do more cleaner way of handling things. Diffs - test/integration/smoke/test_volumes.py 816ae03 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16086/diff/ Testing --- No. Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Re: Review Request 16086: Added a temp sleep fix for vm start command
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16086/#review29993 --- what happens if the machine starts only after 31 s ? Can we have a polling mechanism instead. - Sebastien Goasguen On Dec. 6, 2013, 6:28 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16086/ --- (Updated Dec. 6, 2013, 6:28 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Added a temporary time sleep fix post a restart command. Applies to 4.2,master,4.3 Note: Has to clean other things as well and will do more cleaner way of handling things. Diffs - test/integration/smoke/test_volumes.py 816ae03 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16086/diff/ Testing --- No. Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Re: Review Request 16086: Added a temp sleep fix for vm start command
On Dec. 9, 2013, 8:24 a.m., Sebastien Goasguen wrote: what happens if the machine starts only after 31 s ? Can we have a polling mechanism instead. 1. I mentioned it as part of Note under review description. Here, i mentioned to do more cleaner way once time permits. 2. Actually, this is not a permanent fix. There were other clean ups required here. The fix is added when xen team using marvin reported an issue. Sometimes, volume is being detached while the VM is still starting up. If we see there is no status check for vmstart and post the operation. So, post discussion agreed to add up a temp sleep. Thats what even the subject for this review mentions temp seep... - Santhosh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16086/#review29993 --- On Dec. 6, 2013, 6:28 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16086/ --- (Updated Dec. 6, 2013, 6:28 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Added a temporary time sleep fix post a restart command. Applies to 4.2,master,4.3 Note: Has to clean other things as well and will do more cleaner way of handling things. Diffs - test/integration/smoke/test_volumes.py 816ae03 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16086/diff/ Testing --- No. Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Re: Review Request 16121: Added Fix for CLOUDSTACK-5269, CLOUDSTACK-5378
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/#review29995 --- you can get the extension in a single line: extension = os.path.splitext(filename)[1] - Sebastien Goasguen On Dec. 9, 2013, 7:03 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 7:03 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5269 and CLOUDSTACK-5378 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5269 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5378 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Currently, post discovery other scripts away from python files are as well pickedup for running which are available in a given package and which follows nose default convention, though these files sometimes are not tests. Added explicit check to pickup only python tests for execution for now. Note: As of now python integration tests are only run using nose. If there are any requirements that can be modified. Diffs - tools/marvin/marvin/marvinPlugin.py 852b84a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/diff/ Testing --- Tested DeployDC,Basic Sanity post the changes Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Re: Review Request 15922: Enhanced few features under Marvin
Will, Did that solve your problem ? On Dec 7, 2013, at 3:15 AM, Girish Shilamkar gir...@clogeny.com wrote: Fixed in 4.2, 4.3 and master. Regards, Girish On 07-Dec-2013, at 12:47 PM, Girish Shilamkar gir...@clogeny.com wrote: Mea culpa. I will push the missed out files. Regards, Girish On 07-Dec-2013, at 12:34 PM, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com wrote: I was thinking that it was an install issue. So, I just pulled the latest code for 4.3 and master to see the changes for this patch, i could see marvinLog.py and marvinInit.py files seems to be missing and so is the reason for this failure. If we see, these files were available as part of the patch, these were not pushed. Regards, Santhosh From: williamstev...@gmail.com [williamstev...@gmail.com] on behalf of Will Stevens [wstev...@cloudops.com] Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2013 12:24 AM To: Santhosh Edukulla Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Girish Shilamkar Subject: Re: Review Request 15922: Enhanced few features under Marvin If you looked at the steps I have done, you will see that I have done that... I have done a clean install in order to get the latest marvin. That didnt work so I tried grabbing a version from online. That didnt work. I also tried doing a 'python setup.py install'. That also didn't work... So you're saying that this SHOULD work??? # clean install (I have to skip tests because 'Apache CloudStack Console Proxy - RDP Client' fails tests) $ mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true # deploy the db $ mvn -P developer -pl developer,tools/devcloud -Ddeploydb # I have done it with and without the following lines $ cd tools/marvin $ python setup.py install # start the server $ chmod 755 /mnt/hgfs/palo_alto/cloudstack/client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.3.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh $ export MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m -Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8787,server=y,suspend=n $ mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run # now I try to deploy the server $ export MAVEN_OPTS= $ mvn -P developer -pl tools/devcloud -Ddeploysvr -X This results in: [DEBUG] Executing command line: python ../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py -i devcloud.cfg Traceback (most recent call last): File ../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 567, in module from marvin.marvinLog import MarvinLog ImportError: No module named marvinLog On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.commailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com wrote: 1. The path mentioned below does not contain latest. 2. When you pull the latest 4.3 code, the latest marvin for that build is available with it. So, running python setup.py install in that folder should install latest marvin 3. In your case of running mvn, under devcloud pom.xml, you are asking it to run deploy data center as well using -Ddeploysvr switch which requires latest marvin to work with deployDataCenter. So for devcloud module, you need latest marvin. I would recommend running mvn clean install or with other some profile as mvn clean install -P developer,systemvm It will get you latest marvin with cloudstackAPI folder and running python setup.py install from tools/marvin should install the marvin. Thereafter you can build devcloud. Let me know. Regards, Santhosh From: williamstev...@gmail.commailto:williamstev...@gmail.com [williamstev...@gmail.commailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] on behalf of Will Stevens [wstev...@cloudops.commailto:wstev...@cloudops.com] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 10:59 PM To: Santhosh Edukulla Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Girish Shilamkar Subject: Re: Review Request 15922: Enhanced few features under Marvin Where do I get the latest package? I was getting 1555 from here: https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-marvin/ I did run 'python setup.py install' in the 'tools/marvin' directory and that did not work either. Can you specify the steps I need to take to get this working? Thanks, Will On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.commailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.commailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.commailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com wrote: Hi will, You need to install latest marvin. Changes to it requires for users to install it again. Using mvn, it just builds and packages, it wont install. under marvin folder, run python setup.py install, or can use pip install marvin..tar.gz Thanks! Santhosh From: Will Stevens [nore...@reviews.apache.orgmailto:nore...@reviews.apache.orgmailto:nore...@reviews.apache.orgmailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] on behalf of Will Stevens
Review Request 16122: CLOUDSTACK-4498 cherry picked from 4.2
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16122/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4498 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4498 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-4498 we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false. Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/guru/VMwareGuru.java 081c651 plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareManagerImpl.java 066a395 plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java e34d5e1 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16122/diff/ Testing --- tested on master. Thanks, bharat kumar
Re: Template not in ready state
Talluri/Nitin, I did check the ms logs. There were no errors. The issue was with the download url, it was a local url and the webserver was down. Thanks for your help. Regards, Girish On 07-Dec-2013, at 9:06 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote: Can you check the MS logs, what errors are reported for this template download ? And then refer to the wiki suggested below. On 07/12/13 6:21 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote: Have you checked all the points in this wiki ? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Se c ondary+storage+troubleshooting ~Talluri On 07/12/13 4:07 pm, Girish Shilamkar gir...@clogeny.com wrote: Hello, I am trying to get a CS setup up, zones etc are setup. But templates are not in ready state. I tried various things like: - Checking agent status - Running ssvm health check - Checked ssvm logs for errors, nothing useful In db template_host_ref is empty. But I can see templates listed in in Templates section. What else I can check to get to the bottom of this problem ? Regards, Girish
Re: Template not in ready state
What states are the templates in ? 2013/12/9 Girish Shilamkar gir...@clogeny.com Talluri/Nitin, I did check the ms logs. There were no errors. The issue was with the download url, it was a local url and the webserver was down. Thanks for your help. Regards, Girish On 07-Dec-2013, at 9:06 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote: Can you check the MS logs, what errors are reported for this template download ? And then refer to the wiki suggested below. On 07/12/13 6:21 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote: Have you checked all the points in this wiki ? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Se c ondary+storage+troubleshooting ~Talluri On 07/12/13 4:07 pm, Girish Shilamkar gir...@clogeny.com wrote: Hello, I am trying to get a CS setup up, zones etc are setup. But templates are not in ready state. I tried various things like: - Checking agent status - Running ssvm health check - Checked ssvm logs for errors, nothing useful In db template_host_ref is empty. But I can see templates listed in in Templates section. What else I can check to get to the bottom of this problem ? Regards, Girish -- Rafael Weingärtner
Re: Template not in ready state
The problem is fixed. The CS was setup to use internal webserver for downloading the template and it was running. Regards, Girish On 09-Dec-2013, at 2:54 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: What states are the templates in ? 2013/12/9 Girish Shilamkar gir...@clogeny.com Talluri/Nitin, I did check the ms logs. There were no errors. The issue was with the download url, it was a local url and the webserver was down. Thanks for your help. Regards, Girish On 07-Dec-2013, at 9:06 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote: Can you check the MS logs, what errors are reported for this template download ? And then refer to the wiki suggested below. On 07/12/13 6:21 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote: Have you checked all the points in this wiki ? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Se c ondary+storage+troubleshooting ~Talluri On 07/12/13 4:07 pm, Girish Shilamkar gir...@clogeny.com wrote: Hello, I am trying to get a CS setup up, zones etc are setup. But templates are not in ready state. I tried various things like: - Checking agent status - Running ssvm health check - Checked ssvm logs for errors, nothing useful In db template_host_ref is empty. But I can see templates listed in in Templates section. What else I can check to get to the bottom of this problem ? Regards, Girish -- Rafael Weingärtner
Re: [VOTE] 2nd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC
On 05/12/13 4:17 pm, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: While in a perfect world we wouldn't have any schema changes two things jump out at me in this case. 1. We have precedent in doing schema changes in bugfix (both 4.0.1 and 4.1.1 had some schema changes) 2. We already have some schema changes in 4.2.1 (admittedly, just a change in a view, but still a schema change) Point taken, the upgrade issue has been fixed and the ACL ticket is worked on by Kishan. Hopefully, I will be able to respin RC for second round of voting by EOD today. For future releases I will request community members to be more proactive in escalating the issues and not wait till the time of voting. -abhi
Review Request 16126: CLOUDSTACK-5404: Fix timezone bug in network usages
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16126/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala and Wei Zhou. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5404 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5404 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Fix CLOUDSTACK-5404, which was causing a timezone issue: network usages (network bytes sent/received) are in local time, whereas other usages (instances, volumes, network offerings, etc.) are in GMT. More details on Jira (CLOUDSTACK-5404). I did the patch on branch 4.2 where I encountered the bug, but it should be applied on master and 4.3. Diffs - engine/schema/src/com/cloud/usage/dao/UsageDaoImpl.java 8b79257 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16126/diff/ Testing --- I packaged the patch version in RPMs, installed it, and the bug is fixed. No regression found. Thanks, Olivier Lemasle
Re: Review Request 16122: CLOUDSTACK-4498 cherry picked from 4.2
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16122/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 10:39 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy. Changes --- patch for 4.3 Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4498 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4498 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-4498 we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false. Diffs (updated) - plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/guru/VMwareGuru.java eb3cb6b plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareManagerImpl.java d306b74 plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java 69f1b74 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16122/diff/ Testing --- tested on master. Thanks, bharat kumar
Review Request 16127: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-5411
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16127/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5411 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5411 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- 1. Currently, there was an issue with logging formatter under marvin. Proper format messages are not getting printed. Fixed that. 2. There were few references in existing cfg files for earlier used logger node. Removed them and added new logger node as part of pending clean up. 3. Added TC information started, flow and the result accordingly to runlog. This will simplify to see the test case starting , sequence of steps and final result including timestamps for test c 4. Added few changes to dump the exception throwing tc's to the explicit exception file. Diffs - tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/CI.md PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/README.md PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/advanced_env.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/asf_test.cfg PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/bashUtils.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/buildGenerator.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/configure.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/hudson.sh PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/kvm.cfg PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/kvm.properties PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/openport.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/redeploy.sh PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/restartMgmt.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/system.properties PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/testSetupSuccess.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/vm-start.sh PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/vm-uninstall.sh PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/xen.cfg PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/xen.properties PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/xunitmp/setup.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/xunitmp/xunitmultiprocess.py PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16127/diff/ Testing --- Tested running basic sanity post changes. Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Re: Review Request 16127: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-5411
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16127/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 11:17 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Changes --- Added correct patch Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5411 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5411 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- 1. Currently, there was an issue with logging formatter under marvin. Proper format messages are not getting printed. Fixed that. 2. There were few references in existing cfg files for earlier used logger node. Removed them and added new logger node as part of pending clean up. 3. Added TC information started, flow and the result accordingly to runlog. This will simplify to see the test case starting , sequence of steps and final result including timestamps for test c 4. Added few changes to dump the exception throwing tc's to the explicit exception file. Diffs (updated) - setup/dev/advancedsg.cfg c6a1f59 setup/dev/basic.cfg e91c87a tools/devcloud/devcloud.cfg e209b55 tools/marvin/marvin/codes.py 8f0f88d tools/marvin/marvin/config/setup.cfg 216314f tools/marvin/marvin/marvinInit.py d822a2b tools/marvin/marvin/marvinLog.py ca4d600 tools/marvin/marvin/marvinPlugin.py f5b7a88 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16127/diff/ Testing --- Tested running basic sanity post changes. Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Re: Review Request 14124: CLOUDSTACK-4622 : If a VM from guest network is added to network tier of VPC then IP reservation allows the CIDR to be a superset of Network CIDR for that VPC tier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14124/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 11:30 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Sateesh Chodapuneedi. Changes --- Updating a three month old patch as it was not applying cleanly on master. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4622 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4622 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Add a new utility method for comparing 2 CIDRs. The method takes in 2 cidrs, cidrA and cidrB and returns true if cidrA's IP range is equal or a subset of cidrB's IP range. Diffs (updated) - server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java 6855587 utils/src/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java c0c792f utils/test/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtilsTest.java c7407bf Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14124/diff/ Testing --- Added unit test for the utility. Tested locally. Build is successful. Patch applies cleanly. Thanks, Saksham Srivastava
Re: Review Request 13745: CLOUDSTACK-4329: [DOC] Added Linux template creation documentation
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13745/#review29997 --- Ship it! thanks, applied to master 0c439696301dc6a776b085b580f12ca6f054f0b0 - Sebastien Goasguen On Dec. 8, 2013, 3:34 p.m., Marty Sweet wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13745/ --- (Updated Dec. 8, 2013, 3:34 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4329 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4329 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Added 2 documents (prepare-linux-template and create-linux-template) which covers details explained in CLOUDSTACK-4329 on how to create a working Linux Template. Adjusted working-with-templates.xml to add menu item. Diffs - en-US/create-linux-template.xml PRE-CREATION en-US/prepare-linux-template.xml PRE-CREATION en-US/working-with-templates.xml 9f4e750 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13745/diff/ Testing --- Documents build with Publican Thanks, Marty Sweet
Review Request 16128: CLOUDSTACK-4973: Specified locale keyboard language is not showing as default in consoleView passed during deployVM.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16128/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, Rajesh Battala, and Sateesh Chodapuneedi. Bugs: CLOUUDSTACK-4973 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUUDSTACK-4973 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-4973: Specified locale keyboard language is not showing as default in consoleView passed during deployVM. While deploying a VM, user passes the keyboard parameter to specify the default language for that VM but in the consoleView, the default language selected is en-us irrespective of the default language of the VM. Diffs - server/src/com/cloud/servlet/ConsoleProxyClientParam.java e420110 server/src/com/cloud/servlet/ConsoleProxyServlet.java b3415db services/console-proxy/server/src/com/cloud/consoleproxy/ConsoleProxyAjaxHandler.java 6cadeca services/console-proxy/server/src/com/cloud/consoleproxy/ConsoleProxyClientBase.java 07a1b6f services/console-proxy/server/src/com/cloud/consoleproxy/ConsoleProxyClientParam.java 8de4955 services/console-proxy/server/src/com/cloud/consoleproxy/ConsoleProxyHttpHandlerHelper.java 297e711 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16128/diff/ Testing --- Verified the fix locally by deploying a VM with keyboard=uk and keyboard=jp. Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Re: Isolated Network with no Services
From the UI yes, you can try with API directly. On 09/12/13 12:19 PM, Simon Murphy simon.mur...@vifx.co.nz wrote: I can successfully create the network offering with no services, however when I go to deploy it is not listed under the available network offerings.Seems like only Isolated Networks with SourceNAT enabled are displayedŠis this correct? Simon Murphy Solutions Architect ViFX | Cloud Infrastructure Level 7, 57 Fort Street, Auckland, New Zealand 1010 PO Box 106700, Auckland, New Zealand 1143 M +64 21 285 4519 | S simon_a_murphy www.vifx.co.nz http://www.vifx.co.nz/ follow us on twitter https://twitter.com/ViFX Auckland | Wellington | Christchurch experience. expertise. execution. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, without prejudice and may contain information that is subject to legal privilege. It is intended solely for the use of the individual/s to whom it is addressed in accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act (1993). The content contained in this email does not, necessarily, reflect the official policy position of ViFX nor does ViFX have any responsibility for any alterations to the contents of this email that may occur following transmission. If you are not the addressee it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information contained within this email. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender prior to deleting this email message from your system. Please note ViFX reserves the right to monitor, from time to time, the communications sent to and from its email network. On 3/12/13 6:29 PM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote: HTH http://blog.remibergsma.com/2012/03/10/howto-create-a-network-in-cloudsta c k-without-a-virtual-router/ From: Simon Murphy simon.mur...@vifx.co.nzmailto:simon.mur...@vifx.co.nz Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Tuesday, 3 December 2013 8:15 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org us...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org, dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Isolated Network with no Services Is it possible to configure a network offering for an isolated network that has no services? I would like to give the customer the option to create a network that is totally isolated (no L3 connectivity) so that they can bring their own software router/firewall. The isolated network would be connected to other networks via the customers virtual router. I can create the network offering however it is not listed as an available service when I try to create the network. Cheers, Simon Simon Murphy Solutions Architect ViFX | Cloud Infrastructure Level 7, 57 Fort Street, Auckland, New Zealand 1010 PO Box 106700, Auckland, New Zealand 1143 M +64 21 285 4519 | S simon_a_murphy www.vifx.co.nzhttp://www.vifx.co.nz/ follow us on twitterhttps://twitter.com/ViFX Auckland | Wellington | Christchurch [cid:image003.jpg@01CDDF95.815BF160] experience. expertise. execution. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, without prejudice and may contain information that is subject to legal privilege. It is intended solely for the use of the individual/s to whom it is addressed in accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act (1993). The content contained in this email does not, necessarily, reflect the official policy position of ViFX nor does ViFX have any responsibility for any alterations to the contents of this email that may occur following transmission. If you are not the addressee it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information contained within this email. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender prior to deleting this email message from your system. Please note ViFX reserves the right to monitor, from time to time, the communications sent to and from its email network.
[DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs
Hi, There has been lots of discussion about docs over the last 3/4 months, in summary the issues are: -Difficult to maintain and keep website up to date (issues with lang and issues with pdf formatting lately) -Difficult to contribute to easily, docbook is fine but tedious to work on. -Errors in the docs don't get properly fixed -Mix of OS information -Lack of content for certain features -Docs release cycle. Docs have bugs that will never get fixed in that specific release (because we see it as code release) To remedy some of those issues and work on a new release process specific to docs we moved the docs to its own repo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git *I propose that we move away from docbook and use a more readable format: restructuredtext* I have worked on a prototype that uses restructured text: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html This format makes it extremely easy to write docs. Existing docbook content could be converted to .rst using a tool like pandoc: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/ *In addition to changing the format I propose that we use readthedocs.org* This will help with the release and build of the docs. readthedocs grabs the docs from a git repo, builds html, pdf and epub. It can also maintain several releases. We can apply a specific -theme- to our docs. See a prototype here: http://cloudstack.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ *I propose that we move to this as early as 4.3 documentation* Assuming this proposal passes, we would need to: -re-architect the repo -create the proper cnames to be in accordance with trademark guidelines -we can decide what content to keep or not and convert what we keep. -decide how we organize the content -start accepting pull requests (noting that pages can be edited directly from github) -make a first release of this new doc site at the same time than 4.3 release. Thoughts, flames ? -Sebastien
Review Request 16129: CLOUDSTACK-5419: missing parameters in configuration table and to remove unused parameters
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16129/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5419 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5419 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-5419: missing parameters in configuration table and to remove unused parameters Following parameters are unused which were introduced in 3.0.6. xen.update.url, update.check.interval, baremetal_dhcp_devices, host.updates.enable Following parameters are missing upon upgrade from 3.0.6 to 4.3 vmsnapshot.create.wait, vmsnapshot.max Diffs - server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java 6ffeb26 setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql a9c850f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16129/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Harikrishna Patnala
Re: Review Request 15566: Remove the comparison between GuestOSCategoryVO.CATEGORY_NONE and guestOSCategory.getName() to make OS category of 'None' to be a valid option.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15566/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 1:32 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogland. Changes --- updated patch against 4.4.0 Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4969 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4969 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-4969 In server/src/com/cloud/resource/ResourceManagerImpl.java near line 1264, there is a line: if (guestOSCategory != null !GuestOSCategoryVO.CATEGORY_NONE.equalsIgnoreCase(guestOSCategory.getName())). But since GuestOSCategoryVO.CATEGORY_NONE = 'None' and guestOSCategory.getName() = 'None', this would cause OS category of 'None' to not be selected. Removing it does the job. Notice the OS category of 'None' at the top of the dropdown list does not have a valid guestOSCategoryid (and would be null). Diffs (updated) - server/src/com/cloud/resource/ResourceManagerImpl.java 7579b8f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15566/diff/ Testing --- Tested against cloudstack GUI. Was able to change OS category to 'None', the bottom one, and change it back to other OS categories. Selecting the top 'None' would have no effect. Thanks, Yichi Lu
Re: Review Request #15566 - CLOUDSTACK-4969
Daan: I updated patch. Thanks. Yichi On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote: Yichi, Can you update your patch? I will apply it but it doesn't apply to master now. regards On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Yichi Lu yichi...@sungard.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Yichi Lu yichi...@sungard.com Date: Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:38 AM Subject: Review Request #15566 - CLOUDSTACK-4969 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Dear Committers: I submitted this review request a week ago, but have not received any response. I'd appreciate if someone could review this for me. (My another request, # 15633, CLOUDSTACK-5079 is about 5 days old). Thanks. Yichi
Re: Review Request 15999: CLOUDSTACK-5364: Resolving network cleanup issue in egress fw rules test cases
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15999/#review29998 --- Commit 71aa2c0881760b8df75b6b8110833fb850c04317 in branch refs/heads/master from Girish Shilamkar [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=71aa2c0 ] CLOUDSTACK-5364: Fail the test incase cleanup is not successful - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Dec. 4, 2013, 12:12 p.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15999/ --- (Updated Dec. 4, 2013, 12:12 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5364 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5364 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Following test cases failed: test_11_egress_fr11 test_11_1_egress_fr11 They failed due to two isolated networks were being created in an account, that happened in case where network from the previous test did not get deleted. Added loop in tearDown to check if all the vms in the network are expunged before deleting the network, so that the network gets deleted properly before execution of next test case. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py 6dcc2c4d Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15999/diff/ Testing --- Tested locally on KVM advances setup. Log: test_01_1_egress_fr1 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test By-default the communication from guest n/w to public n/w is NOT allowed. ... skipped 'Skip' test_01_egress_fr1 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test By-default the communication from guest n/w to public n/w is allowed. ... skipped 'Skip' test_02_1_egress_fr2 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Allow Communication using Egress rule with CIDR + Port Range + Protocol. ... skipped 'Skip' test_02_egress_fr2 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Allow Communication using Egress rule with CIDR + Port Range + Protocol. ... skipped 'Skip' test_03_1_egress_fr3 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Communication blocked with network that is other than specified ... skipped 'Skip' test_03_egress_fr3 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Communication blocked with network that is other than specified ... skipped 'Skip' test_04_1_egress_fr4 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule and check the Firewall_Rules DB table ... skipped 'Skip' test_04_egress_fr4 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule and check the Firewall_Rules DB table ... skipped 'Skip' test_05_1_egress_fr5 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule and check the IP tables ... skipped 'Skip' test_05_egress_fr5 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule and check the IP tables ... skipped 'Skip' test_06_1_egress_fr6 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule without CIDR ... skipped 'Skip' test_06_egress_fr6 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule without CIDR ... skipped 'Skip' test_07_1_egress_fr7 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule without End Port ... skipped 'Skip' test_07_egress_fr7 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule without End Port ... skipped 'Skip' test_08_1_egress_fr8 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Port Forwarding and Egress Conflict ... skipped 'Skip' test_08_egress_fr8 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Port Forwarding and Egress Conflict ... skipped 'Skip' test_09_1_egress_fr9 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Delete Egress rule ... skipped 'Skip' test_09_egress_fr9 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Delete Egress rule ... skipped 'Skip' test_10_1_egress_fr10 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Invalid CIDR and Invalid Port ranges ... skipped 'Skip' test_10_egress_fr10 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Invalid CIDR and Invalid Port ranges ... skipped 'Skip' test_11_1_egress_fr11 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Regression on Firewall + PF + LB + SNAT ... ok test_11_egress_fr11 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Regression on Firewall + PF + LB + SNAT ... ok test_12_1_egress_fr12 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Reboot Router ... skipped 'Skip' test_12_egress_fr12 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Reboot Router ... skipped 'Skip' test_13_1_egress_fr13
Re: Review Request 15999: CLOUDSTACK-5364: Resolving network cleanup issue in egress fw rules test cases
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15999/#review2 --- Commit 0533001feb60bf03ef3839774b6ce515f3694857 in branch refs/heads/4.3 from Girish Shilamkar [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=0533001 ] CLOUDSTACK-5364: Fail the test incase cleanup is not successful - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Dec. 4, 2013, 12:12 p.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15999/ --- (Updated Dec. 4, 2013, 12:12 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5364 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5364 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Following test cases failed: test_11_egress_fr11 test_11_1_egress_fr11 They failed due to two isolated networks were being created in an account, that happened in case where network from the previous test did not get deleted. Added loop in tearDown to check if all the vms in the network are expunged before deleting the network, so that the network gets deleted properly before execution of next test case. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py 6dcc2c4d Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15999/diff/ Testing --- Tested locally on KVM advances setup. Log: test_01_1_egress_fr1 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test By-default the communication from guest n/w to public n/w is NOT allowed. ... skipped 'Skip' test_01_egress_fr1 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test By-default the communication from guest n/w to public n/w is allowed. ... skipped 'Skip' test_02_1_egress_fr2 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Allow Communication using Egress rule with CIDR + Port Range + Protocol. ... skipped 'Skip' test_02_egress_fr2 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Allow Communication using Egress rule with CIDR + Port Range + Protocol. ... skipped 'Skip' test_03_1_egress_fr3 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Communication blocked with network that is other than specified ... skipped 'Skip' test_03_egress_fr3 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Communication blocked with network that is other than specified ... skipped 'Skip' test_04_1_egress_fr4 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule and check the Firewall_Rules DB table ... skipped 'Skip' test_04_egress_fr4 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule and check the Firewall_Rules DB table ... skipped 'Skip' test_05_1_egress_fr5 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule and check the IP tables ... skipped 'Skip' test_05_egress_fr5 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule and check the IP tables ... skipped 'Skip' test_06_1_egress_fr6 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule without CIDR ... skipped 'Skip' test_06_egress_fr6 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule without CIDR ... skipped 'Skip' test_07_1_egress_fr7 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule without End Port ... skipped 'Skip' test_07_egress_fr7 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule without End Port ... skipped 'Skip' test_08_1_egress_fr8 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Port Forwarding and Egress Conflict ... skipped 'Skip' test_08_egress_fr8 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Port Forwarding and Egress Conflict ... skipped 'Skip' test_09_1_egress_fr9 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Delete Egress rule ... skipped 'Skip' test_09_egress_fr9 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Delete Egress rule ... skipped 'Skip' test_10_1_egress_fr10 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Invalid CIDR and Invalid Port ranges ... skipped 'Skip' test_10_egress_fr10 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Invalid CIDR and Invalid Port ranges ... skipped 'Skip' test_11_1_egress_fr11 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Regression on Firewall + PF + LB + SNAT ... ok test_11_egress_fr11 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Regression on Firewall + PF + LB + SNAT ... ok test_12_1_egress_fr12 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Reboot Router ... skipped 'Skip' test_12_egress_fr12 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Reboot Router ... skipped 'Skip' test_13_1_egress_fr13
Re: Review Request 15999: CLOUDSTACK-5364: Resolving network cleanup issue in egress fw rules test cases
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15999/#review3 --- Commit 66b7b7e25c8cbc73b5c33ffc87303045913b491b in branch refs/heads/4.2 from Girish Shilamkar [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=66b7b7e ] CLOUDSTACK-5364: Fail the test incase cleanup is not successful - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Dec. 4, 2013, 12:12 p.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15999/ --- (Updated Dec. 4, 2013, 12:12 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5364 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5364 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Following test cases failed: test_11_egress_fr11 test_11_1_egress_fr11 They failed due to two isolated networks were being created in an account, that happened in case where network from the previous test did not get deleted. Added loop in tearDown to check if all the vms in the network are expunged before deleting the network, so that the network gets deleted properly before execution of next test case. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py 6dcc2c4d Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15999/diff/ Testing --- Tested locally on KVM advances setup. Log: test_01_1_egress_fr1 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test By-default the communication from guest n/w to public n/w is NOT allowed. ... skipped 'Skip' test_01_egress_fr1 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test By-default the communication from guest n/w to public n/w is allowed. ... skipped 'Skip' test_02_1_egress_fr2 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Allow Communication using Egress rule with CIDR + Port Range + Protocol. ... skipped 'Skip' test_02_egress_fr2 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Allow Communication using Egress rule with CIDR + Port Range + Protocol. ... skipped 'Skip' test_03_1_egress_fr3 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Communication blocked with network that is other than specified ... skipped 'Skip' test_03_egress_fr3 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Communication blocked with network that is other than specified ... skipped 'Skip' test_04_1_egress_fr4 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule and check the Firewall_Rules DB table ... skipped 'Skip' test_04_egress_fr4 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule and check the Firewall_Rules DB table ... skipped 'Skip' test_05_1_egress_fr5 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule and check the IP tables ... skipped 'Skip' test_05_egress_fr5 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule and check the IP tables ... skipped 'Skip' test_06_1_egress_fr6 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule without CIDR ... skipped 'Skip' test_06_egress_fr6 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule without CIDR ... skipped 'Skip' test_07_1_egress_fr7 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule without End Port ... skipped 'Skip' test_07_egress_fr7 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Create Egress rule without End Port ... skipped 'Skip' test_08_1_egress_fr8 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Port Forwarding and Egress Conflict ... skipped 'Skip' test_08_egress_fr8 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Port Forwarding and Egress Conflict ... skipped 'Skip' test_09_1_egress_fr9 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Delete Egress rule ... skipped 'Skip' test_09_egress_fr9 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Delete Egress rule ... skipped 'Skip' test_10_1_egress_fr10 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Invalid CIDR and Invalid Port ranges ... skipped 'Skip' test_10_egress_fr10 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Invalid CIDR and Invalid Port ranges ... skipped 'Skip' test_11_1_egress_fr11 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Regression on Firewall + PF + LB + SNAT ... ok test_11_egress_fr11 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Regression on Firewall + PF + LB + SNAT ... ok test_12_1_egress_fr12 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Reboot Router ... skipped 'Skip' test_12_egress_fr12 (test_egress_fw_rules_fixed.TestEgressFWRules) Test Reboot Router ... skipped 'Skip' test_13_1_egress_fr13
Re: Master branch - can't run up systemvm with KVM hypervisor
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote: Hmm, that might be due to my patch from two weeks ago. Let me look into this! Yeah, Thanks Wido :-) --Tuna
Re: Review Request 16120: Fixed-CLOUDSTACK-5411
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16120/#review30002 --- Ship it! Pushed to 4.2, 4.3 and master. - Girish Shilamkar On Dec. 9, 2013, 7:05 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16120/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 7:05 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5411 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5411 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Moved build scripts currently maintained in separate repo to marvin. Diffs - tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/CI.md PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/README.md PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/advanced_env.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/asf_test.cfg PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/bashUtils.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/buildGenerator.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/configure.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/hudson.sh PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/kvm.cfg PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/kvm.properties PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/openport.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/redeploy.sh PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/restartMgmt.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/system.properties PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/testSetupSuccess.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/vm-start.sh PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/vm-uninstall.sh PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/xen.cfg PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/xen.properties PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/xunitmp/setup.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/misc/build/xunitmp/xunitmultiprocess.py PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16120/diff/ Testing --- Yes, post these changes tested deployDC and running sanity. Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Re: Review Request 16121: Added Fix for CLOUDSTACK-5269, CLOUDSTACK-5378
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/#review30004 --- Commit 5cbda8b64a127090a255fdfdf188b84e5ed53c74 in branch refs/heads/master from Santhosh Edukulla [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=5cbda8b ] CLOUDSTACK-5269: Fix nose failures. - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Dec. 9, 2013, 7:03 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 7:03 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5269 and CLOUDSTACK-5378 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5269 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5378 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Currently, post discovery other scripts away from python files are as well pickedup for running which are available in a given package and which follows nose default convention, though these files sometimes are not tests. Added explicit check to pickup only python tests for execution for now. Note: As of now python integration tests are only run using nose. If there are any requirements that can be modified. Diffs - tools/marvin/marvin/marvinPlugin.py 852b84a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/diff/ Testing --- Tested DeployDC,Basic Sanity post the changes Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Re: Review Request 16126: CLOUDSTACK-5404: Fix timezone bug in network usages
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16126/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 2:11 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala and Wei Zhou. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5404 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5404 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Fix CLOUDSTACK-5404, which was causing a timezone issue: network usages (network bytes sent/received) are in local time, whereas other usages (instances, volumes, network offerings, etc.) are in GMT. More details on Jira (CLOUDSTACK-5404). I did the patch on branch 4.2 where I encountered the bug, but it should be applied on master and 4.3. Diffs - engine/schema/src/com/cloud/usage/dao/UsageDaoImpl.java 8b79257 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16126/diff/ Testing (updated) --- I packaged the patch version in RPMs (branch 4.2), installed it, and the bug is fixed. No regression found. Thanks, Olivier Lemasle
Re: Review Request 16121: Added Fix for CLOUDSTACK-5269, CLOUDSTACK-5378
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/#review30005 --- Commit 6b5402bbff9fc6aedd27033316b8ad988a21dd60 in branch refs/heads/4.3 from Santhosh Edukulla [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=6b5402b ] CLOUDSTACK-5269: Fix nose failures. - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Dec. 9, 2013, 7:03 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 7:03 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5269 and CLOUDSTACK-5378 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5269 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5378 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Currently, post discovery other scripts away from python files are as well pickedup for running which are available in a given package and which follows nose default convention, though these files sometimes are not tests. Added explicit check to pickup only python tests for execution for now. Note: As of now python integration tests are only run using nose. If there are any requirements that can be modified. Diffs - tools/marvin/marvin/marvinPlugin.py 852b84a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/diff/ Testing --- Tested DeployDC,Basic Sanity post the changes Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Re: Review Request 16121: Added Fix for CLOUDSTACK-5269, CLOUDSTACK-5378
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/#review30006 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.2, 4.3 and master - Girish Shilamkar On Dec. 9, 2013, 7:03 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 7:03 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5269 and CLOUDSTACK-5378 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5269 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5378 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Currently, post discovery other scripts away from python files are as well pickedup for running which are available in a given package and which follows nose default convention, though these files sometimes are not tests. Added explicit check to pickup only python tests for execution for now. Note: As of now python integration tests are only run using nose. If there are any requirements that can be modified. Diffs - tools/marvin/marvin/marvinPlugin.py 852b84a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/diff/ Testing --- Tested DeployDC,Basic Sanity post the changes Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Re: Review Request 16121: Added Fix for CLOUDSTACK-5269, CLOUDSTACK-5378
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/#review30007 --- Commit 2597dad20af4620ac9338f24f1f9a262e8295dac in branch refs/heads/4.2 from Santhosh Edukulla [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=2597dad ] CLOUDSTACK-5269: Fix nose failures. - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Dec. 9, 2013, 7:03 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 7:03 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5269 and CLOUDSTACK-5378 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5269 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5378 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Currently, post discovery other scripts away from python files are as well pickedup for running which are available in a given package and which follows nose default convention, though these files sometimes are not tests. Added explicit check to pickup only python tests for execution for now. Note: As of now python integration tests are only run using nose. If there are any requirements that can be modified. Diffs - tools/marvin/marvin/marvinPlugin.py 852b84a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16121/diff/ Testing --- Tested DeployDC,Basic Sanity post the changes Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Re: Review Request 16127: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-5411
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16127/#review30009 --- Ship it! COmmitted to 4.2, 4.3 and master. - Girish Shilamkar On Dec. 9, 2013, 11:17 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16127/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 11:17 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5411 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5411 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- 1. Currently, there was an issue with logging formatter under marvin. Proper format messages are not getting printed. Fixed that. 2. There were few references in existing cfg files for earlier used logger node. Removed them and added new logger node as part of pending clean up. 3. Added TC information started, flow and the result accordingly to runlog. This will simplify to see the test case starting , sequence of steps and final result including timestamps for test c 4. Added few changes to dump the exception throwing tc's to the explicit exception file. Diffs - setup/dev/advancedsg.cfg c6a1f59 setup/dev/basic.cfg e91c87a tools/devcloud/devcloud.cfg e209b55 tools/marvin/marvin/codes.py 8f0f88d tools/marvin/marvin/config/setup.cfg 216314f tools/marvin/marvin/marvinInit.py d822a2b tools/marvin/marvin/marvinLog.py ca4d600 tools/marvin/marvin/marvinPlugin.py f5b7a88 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16127/diff/ Testing --- Tested running basic sanity post changes. Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Re: Review Request 15566: Remove the comparison between GuestOSCategoryVO.CATEGORY_NONE and guestOSCategory.getName() to make OS category of 'None' to be a valid option.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15566/#review30011 --- Ship it! f194adb2ded586516f98e045bb318ca1af0730e5 - daan Hoogland On Dec. 9, 2013, 1:32 p.m., Yichi Lu wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15566/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 1:32 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogland. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4969 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4969 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-4969 In server/src/com/cloud/resource/ResourceManagerImpl.java near line 1264, there is a line: if (guestOSCategory != null !GuestOSCategoryVO.CATEGORY_NONE.equalsIgnoreCase(guestOSCategory.getName())). But since GuestOSCategoryVO.CATEGORY_NONE = 'None' and guestOSCategory.getName() = 'None', this would cause OS category of 'None' to not be selected. Removing it does the job. Notice the OS category of 'None' at the top of the dropdown list does not have a valid guestOSCategoryid (and would be null). Diffs - server/src/com/cloud/resource/ResourceManagerImpl.java 7579b8f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15566/diff/ Testing --- Tested against cloudstack GUI. Was able to change OS category to 'None', the bottom one, and change it back to other OS categories. Selecting the top 'None' would have no effect. Thanks, Yichi Lu
Re: Master branch - can't run up systemvm with KVM hypervisor
On 12/09/2013 02:52 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote: Hmm, that might be due to my patch from two weeks ago. Let me look into this! Yeah, Thanks Wido :-) I think it's fixed with this patch: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=088247b61b4ecea7bb757becd233e10c97a7a75a Wido --Tuna
Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs
-re-architect the repo -create the proper cnames to be in accordance with trademark guidelines -we can decide what content to keep or not and convert what we keep. -decide how we organize the content -start accepting pull requests (noting that pages can be edited directly from github) -make a first release of this new doc site at the same time than 4.3 release. Thoughts, flames ? So I was the one that picked Publican for CloudStack in the pre-ACS days. I like publican, it generally makes sense to me, seems to work well, and despite the fact that it's DocBook XML with specialized tools for generating finished documentation, it does the job very well. That said, I see a few problems with publican; namely: * DocBook XML is something folks have to learn before being able to contribute (e.g. the barrier to participate is higher) * The build/publish process is difficult at best. Currently I think that only Joe Brockmeier and I know how to do so. (we are SPOFs) I actually looked (at Joe's suggestion) for something else many months ago; and there didn't seem anything that was close to competent for generation of PDFs and EPUBs. I reluctantly tried RTD when Sebastien showed it to me - and was literally blown away - formatting/syntax is simpler, publishing is dead easy; and not dependent on an individual. I am +1 for this change; I think it makes life simpler for anyone who wants to work on docs, and changes next to nothing for the folks who only consume them. --David
RE: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs
+1 for .rst. Its more developer friendly! -Regards, Sateesh -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 December 2013 17:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath; msweet@gmail.com; Mike Tutkowski Subject: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs Hi, There has been lots of discussion about docs over the last 3/4 months, in summary the issues are: -Difficult to maintain and keep website up to date (issues with lang and issues with pdf formatting lately) -Difficult to contribute to easily, docbook is fine but tedious to work on. -Errors in the docs don't get properly fixed -Mix of OS information -Lack of content for certain features -Docs release cycle. Docs have bugs that will never get fixed in that specific release (because we see it as code release) To remedy some of those issues and work on a new release process specific to docs we moved the docs to its own repo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git *I propose that we move away from docbook and use a more readable format: restructuredtext* I have worked on a prototype that uses restructured text: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html This format makes it extremely easy to write docs. Existing docbook content could be converted to .rst using a tool like pandoc: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/ *In addition to changing the format I propose that we use readthedocs.org* This will help with the release and build of the docs. readthedocs grabs the docs from a git repo, builds html, pdf and epub. It can also maintain several releases. We can apply a specific -theme- to our docs. See a prototype here: http://cloudstack.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ *I propose that we move to this as early as 4.3 documentation* Assuming this proposal passes, we would need to: -re-architect the repo -create the proper cnames to be in accordance with trademark guidelines -we can decide what content to keep or not and convert what we keep. -decide how we organize the content -start accepting pull requests (noting that pages can be edited directly from github) -make a first release of this new doc site at the same time than 4.3 release. Thoughts, flames ? -Sebastien
Re: Review Request 16122: CLOUDSTACK-4498 cherry picked from 4.2
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16122/#review30027 --- plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java https://reviews.apache.org/r/16122/#comment57529 Why are you reserving if the flag is false ? - Nitin Mehta On Dec. 9, 2013, 10:39 a.m., bharat kumar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16122/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 10:39 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4498 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4498 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-4498 we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false. Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/guru/VMwareGuru.java eb3cb6b plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareManagerImpl.java d306b74 plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java 69f1b74 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16122/diff/ Testing --- tested on master. Thanks, bharat kumar
Re: How to register an event subscriber
Alex - I think that interface doesn't contain any function definition. So just create the interface yourself and use the example as given. You will have to add in the configuration to instantiate this implementation as well. Thanks, -Nitin On 09/12/13 9:20 AM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote: Hi Muali, Thanks for your information, but in the sample codes, 'EventNotificationSubscriberImpl' implements an interface, 'EventNotificationsSubscriber', but I can't find 'EventNotificationsSubscriber' in the project. Can you show me where it is located? Thanks again. Alex Ough On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote: On 07/12/13 2:52 AM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote: All, To support the new feature, CLOUDSTACK-4992, I'd like to create an event subscriber that implements 'EventSubscriber' interface, but I'm not sure how to register that subscriber to make it running. Alex, I pasted a subscriber example at [1]. You need to register the subscriber with interested events. Subscriber should implement 'EventSubscriber'. Do I need to specify it in any config file or load it from anywhere when the management server is started? If your code is expected to run with management server, you can just load the EventBus, and subscribe to it. HTH [1] http://pastebin.com/XhFdfa1U Your reply will be very appreciated. Thanks Alex Ough
Re: How to register an event subscriber
But I think there seems to be a missing package because I can't find the package, 'utils', that includes these 2 classes either. import com.cloud.utils.component.Adapters; import com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentLocator; FYI, I'm using the master. Thanks Alex Ough On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote: Alex - I think that interface doesn't contain any function definition. So just create the interface yourself and use the example as given. You will have to add in the configuration to instantiate this implementation as well. Thanks, -Nitin On 09/12/13 9:20 AM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote: Hi Muali, Thanks for your information, but in the sample codes, 'EventNotificationSubscriberImpl' implements an interface, 'EventNotificationsSubscriber', but I can't find 'EventNotificationsSubscriber' in the project. Can you show me where it is located? Thanks again. Alex Ough On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote: On 07/12/13 2:52 AM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote: All, To support the new feature, CLOUDSTACK-4992, I'd like to create an event subscriber that implements 'EventSubscriber' interface, but I'm not sure how to register that subscriber to make it running. Alex, I pasted a subscriber example at [1]. You need to register the subscriber with interested events. Subscriber should implement 'EventSubscriber'. Do I need to specify it in any config file or load it from anywhere when the management server is started? If your code is expected to run with management server, you can just load the EventBus, and subscribe to it. HTH [1] http://pastebin.com/XhFdfa1U Your reply will be very appreciated. Thanks Alex Ough
RE: Isolated Network with no Services
works using the api. thanks. Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Murali Reddy [murali.re...@citrix.com] Received: Tuesday, 10 Dec 2013, 12:42am To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org [dev@cloudstack.apache.org]; us...@cloudstack.apache.org [us...@cloudstack.apache.org] Subject: Re: Isolated Network with no Services From the UI yes, you can try with API directly. On 09/12/13 12:19 PM, Simon Murphy simon.mur...@vifx.co.nz wrote: I can successfully create the network offering with no services, however when I go to deploy it is not listed under the available network offerings.Seems like only Isolated Networks with SourceNAT enabled are displayedŠis this correct? Simon Murphy Solutions Architect ViFX | Cloud Infrastructure Level 7, 57 Fort Street, Auckland, New Zealand 1010 PO Box 106700, Auckland, New Zealand 1143 M +64 21 285 4519 | S simon_a_murphy www.vifx.co.nzhttp://www.vifx.co.nz http://www.vifx.co.nz/ follow us on twitter https://twitter.com/ViFX Auckland | Wellington | Christchurch experience. expertise. execution. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, without prejudice and may contain information that is subject to legal privilege. It is intended solely for the use of the individual/s to whom it is addressed in accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act (1993). The content contained in this email does not, necessarily, reflect the official policy position of ViFX nor does ViFX have any responsibility for any alterations to the contents of this email that may occur following transmission. If you are not the addressee it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information contained within this email. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender prior to deleting this email message from your system. Please note ViFX reserves the right to monitor, from time to time, the communications sent to and from its email network. On 3/12/13 6:29 PM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote: HTH http://blog.remibergsma.com/2012/03/10/howto-create-a-network-in-cloudsta c k-without-a-virtual-router/ From: Simon Murphy simon.mur...@vifx.co.nzmailto:simon.mur...@vifx.co.nz Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Tuesday, 3 December 2013 8:15 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org us...@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org, dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Isolated Network with no Services Is it possible to configure a network offering for an isolated network that has no services? I would like to give the customer the option to create a network that is totally isolated (no L3 connectivity) so that they can bring their own software router/firewall. The isolated network would be connected to other networks via the customers virtual router. I can create the network offering however it is not listed as an available service when I try to create the network. Cheers, Simon Simon Murphy Solutions Architect ViFX | Cloud Infrastructure Level 7, 57 Fort Street, Auckland, New Zealand 1010 PO Box 106700, Auckland, New Zealand 1143 M +64 21 285 4519 | S simon_a_murphy www.vifx.co.nzhttp://www.vifx.co.nz/ follow us on twitterhttps://twitter.com/ViFX Auckland | Wellington | Christchurch [cid:image003.jpg@01CDDF95.815BF160] experience. expertise. execution. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, without prejudice and may contain information that is subject to legal privilege. It is intended solely for the use of the individual/s to whom it is addressed in accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act (1993). The content contained in this email does not, necessarily, reflect the official policy position of ViFX nor does ViFX have any responsibility for any alterations to the contents of this email that may occur following transmission. If you are not the addressee it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information contained within this email. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender prior to deleting this email message from your system. Please note ViFX reserves the right to monitor, from time to time, the communications sent to and from its email network.
Jetty running into an error
Hi all,
I am still new to this and trying to run jetty server i get the following
errors. Can someone please take a look to see what I could be doing wrong.
Regards
Usman
On http://localhost:8080/client I get
HTTP ERROR: 503
Problem accessing /client. Reason:
SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE
Powered by Jetty://
and on http://localhost:8080/
I get
Error 404 - Not Found.No context on this server matched or handled this request.
Contexts known to this server are:
* /client ---
org.mortbay.jetty.plugin.Jetty6PluginWebAppContext@2830b9bd{/client,C:\cygwin64\home\User\cloudstack\client\target\generated-webapp}
Issue in accessing Windows and Linux VM
Hi All, Can someone please tell me how to add drivers to the windows VM created from windows ISO? Also please tell me how to configure this windows VM to make it accessible via RDP. And what all changes I need to make on linux vm to make it accessible via putty? Thanks in advance. Regards, Jitendra
[4.3 BUG] Egress rules in Palo Alto
Hey all, There is currently a bug in the implementation of egress firewall rules in the Palo Alto plugin. Here is the bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5425 I have attached a patch for the 4.3 branch in the bug, but I don't think I have commit access, so I will need someone else to apply it. The patch 'should' work on both 4.3 and master, but if not, I will put together a patch for master. In this patch I have also addressed 'Issue 1' in this email thread: http://markmail.org/message/32tspuyjppk4llmi?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Eincubator%2Ecloudstack-%2A+Coverage+Analysis:+Few+Issues Let me know if you have any questions... Cheers, Will
Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs
Looks good to me. +1 The format is much more dev friendly so it might help with getting more people to write docs. Cheers, Hugo On 9 dec. 2013, at 18:08, Sateesh Chodapuneedi sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote: +1 for .rst. Its more developer friendly! -Regards, Sateesh -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 December 2013 17:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath; msweet@gmail.com; Mike Tutkowski Subject: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs Hi, There has been lots of discussion about docs over the last 3/4 months, in summary the issues are: -Difficult to maintain and keep website up to date (issues with lang and issues with pdf formatting lately) -Difficult to contribute to easily, docbook is fine but tedious to work on. -Errors in the docs don't get properly fixed -Mix of OS information -Lack of content for certain features -Docs release cycle. Docs have bugs that will never get fixed in that specific release (because we see it as code release) To remedy some of those issues and work on a new release process specific to docs we moved the docs to its own repo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git *I propose that we move away from docbook and use a more readable format: restructuredtext* I have worked on a prototype that uses restructured text: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html This format makes it extremely easy to write docs. Existing docbook content could be converted to .rst using a tool like pandoc: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/ *In addition to changing the format I propose that we use readthedocs.org* This will help with the release and build of the docs. readthedocs grabs the docs from a git repo, builds html, pdf and epub. It can also maintain several releases. We can apply a specific -theme- to our docs. See a prototype here: http://cloudstack.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ *I propose that we move to this as early as 4.3 documentation* Assuming this proposal passes, we would need to: -re-architect the repo -create the proper cnames to be in accordance with trademark guidelines -we can decide what content to keep or not and convert what we keep. -decide how we organize the content -start accepting pull requests (noting that pages can be edited directly from github) -make a first release of this new doc site at the same time than 4.3 release. Thoughts, flames ? -Sebastien
Re: 4.3 vmware automation blocker
This issue is caused by trying to solve a mysterious JVM incompatibility issue in a wrong trying in commit ed0fbcc81c1928062054190ffcfab8bb59969cc2. Min has already reverted the commit and this should have fixed the memory issue. Kelven On 12/7/13, 5:07 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com] Sent: 08 December 2013 04:32 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: 4.3 vmware automation blocker Vm deployment failing latest 4.3 build in Vmware environment; below defect created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5408 4.3 automation blocked due to this; someone possible to look this ? I also observed this. Upgrading SSVM's service offering to accommodate more memory (784MB instead of default 256MB) has helped. Regards, Sateesh Regards, Rayees
RE: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs
+1. And suggest using Sphinx with the plugin http://bronto.github.io/javasphinx/ -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 2:19 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath; msweet@gmail.com; Mike Tutkowski Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs Looks good to me. +1 The format is much more dev friendly so it might help with getting more people to write docs. Cheers, Hugo On 9 dec. 2013, at 18:08, Sateesh Chodapuneedi sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote: +1 for .rst. Its more developer friendly! -Regards, Sateesh -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 December 2013 17:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath; msweet@gmail.com; Mike Tutkowski Subject: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs Hi, There has been lots of discussion about docs over the last 3/4 months, in summary the issues are: -Difficult to maintain and keep website up to date (issues with lang and issues with pdf formatting lately) -Difficult to contribute to easily, docbook is fine but tedious to work on. -Errors in the docs don't get properly fixed -Mix of OS information -Lack of content for certain features -Docs release cycle. Docs have bugs that will never get fixed in that specific release (because we see it as code release) To remedy some of those issues and work on a new release process specific to docs we moved the docs to its own repo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git *I propose that we move away from docbook and use a more readable format: restructuredtext* I have worked on a prototype that uses restructured text: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html This format makes it extremely easy to write docs. Existing docbook content could be converted to .rst using a tool like pandoc: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/ *In addition to changing the format I propose that we use readthedocs.org* This will help with the release and build of the docs. readthedocs grabs the docs from a git repo, builds html, pdf and epub. It can also maintain several releases. We can apply a specific -theme- to our docs. See a prototype here: http://cloudstack.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ *I propose that we move to this as early as 4.3 documentation* Assuming this proposal passes, we would need to: -re-architect the repo -create the proper cnames to be in accordance with trademark guidelines -we can decide what content to keep or not and convert what we keep. -decide how we organize the content -start accepting pull requests (noting that pages can be edited directly from github) -make a first release of this new doc site at the same time than 4.3 release. Thoughts, flames ? -Sebastien
SRX/ASA and ACS VPC
Is it possible to offload firewall, SourceNAT and inter-VLAN routing functions to hardware devices for VPC networks? Simon Murphy Solutions Architect ViFX | Cloud Infrastructure Level 7, 57 Fort Street, Auckland, New Zealand 1010 PO Box 106700, Auckland, New Zealand 1143 M +64 21 285 4519 | S simon_a_murphy www.vifx.co.nzhttp://www.vifx.co.nz/ follow us on twitterhttps://twitter.com/ViFX Auckland | Wellington | Christchurch [cid:image003.jpg@01CDDF95.815BF160] experience. expertise. execution. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, without prejudice and may contain information that is subject to legal privilege. It is intended solely for the use of the individual/s to whom it is addressed in accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act (1993). The content contained in this email does not, necessarily, reflect the official policy position of ViFX nor does ViFX have any responsibility for any alterations to the contents of this email that may occur following transmission. If you are not the addressee it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information contained within this email. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender prior to deleting this email message from your system. Please note ViFX reserves the right to monitor, from time to time, the communications sent to and from its email network.
Re: 4.3 vmware automation blocker
Oops, not the same problem. 5408 is out of system memory, different than the one I mentioned about Min¹s fix which is about JVM heap Kelven On 12/9/13, 2:53 PM, Kelven Yang kelven.y...@citrix.com wrote: This issue is caused by trying to solve a mysterious JVM incompatibility issue in a wrong trying in commit ed0fbcc81c1928062054190ffcfab8bb59969cc2. Min has already reverted the commit and this should have fixed the memory issue. Kelven On 12/7/13, 5:07 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com] Sent: 08 December 2013 04:32 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: 4.3 vmware automation blocker Vm deployment failing latest 4.3 build in Vmware environment; below defect created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5408 4.3 automation blocked due to this; someone possible to look this ? I also observed this. Upgrading SSVM's service offering to accommodate more memory (784MB instead of default 256MB) has helped. Regards, Sateesh Regards, Rayees
Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs
Nice. According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweight_markup_language and see that it is quite similar to Markdown. On 12/9/13 2:18 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote: Looks good to me. +1 The format is much more dev friendly so it might help with getting more people to write docs. Cheers, Hugo On 9 dec. 2013, at 18:08, Sateesh Chodapuneedi sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote: +1 for .rst. Its more developer friendly! -Regards, Sateesh -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 December 2013 17:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath; msweet@gmail.com; Mike Tutkowski Subject: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs Hi, There has been lots of discussion about docs over the last 3/4 months, in summary the issues are: -Difficult to maintain and keep website up to date (issues with lang and issues with pdf formatting lately) -Difficult to contribute to easily, docbook is fine but tedious to work on. -Errors in the docs don't get properly fixed -Mix of OS information -Lack of content for certain features -Docs release cycle. Docs have bugs that will never get fixed in that specific release (because we see it as code release) To remedy some of those issues and work on a new release process specific to docs we moved the docs to its own repo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git *I propose that we move away from docbook and use a more readable format: restructuredtext* I have worked on a prototype that uses restructured text: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html This format makes it extremely easy to write docs. Existing docbook content could be converted to .rst using a tool like pandoc: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/ *In addition to changing the format I propose that we use readthedocs.org* This will help with the release and build of the docs. readthedocs grabs the docs from a git repo, builds html, pdf and epub. It can also maintain several releases. We can apply a specific -theme- to our docs. See a prototype here: http://cloudstack.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ *I propose that we move to this as early as 4.3 documentation* Assuming this proposal passes, we would need to: -re-architect the repo -create the proper cnames to be in accordance with trademark guidelines -we can decide what content to keep or not and convert what we keep. -decide how we organize the content -start accepting pull requests (noting that pages can be edited directly from github) -make a first release of this new doc site at the same time than 4.3 release. Thoughts, flames ? -Sebastien
Blocker bug: can't create the volumes on Xen 6.2.0 on the latest 4.3
There is some regression bug on the latest 4.3 – volumes creation fails on xen 6.2.0. Steps made: 1) Deployed CS code and redeployed the DB 2) Added xen host to the CS 3) VDI creation fails with generic error message 2013-12-09 15:56:44,629 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2d667640) can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 2013-12-09 15:56:44,629 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2d667640) Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 Anthony, I wonder if it can be related to your latest changes. Can you please take a look as its a blocker. -Alena.
Re: Blocker bug: can't create the volumes on Xen 6.2.0 on the latest 4.3
Is this happening in your ssvm startup? If so, go to your xen host, /opt/cloud/bin folder, check if you have vhd-util there. Not sure why, it seems that we have changed the directory from previous /opt/xensources to /opt/cloud. I ran into a similar problem in starting up ssvm. Thanks -min On 12/9/13 3:58 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote: There is some regression bug on the latest 4.3 volumes creation fails on xen 6.2.0. Steps made: 1) Deployed CS code and redeployed the DB 2) Added xen host to the CS 3) VDI creation fails with generic error message 2013-12-09 15:56:44,629 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2d667640) can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 2013-12-09 15:56:44,629 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2d667640) Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 Anthony, I wonder if it can be related to your latest changes. Can you please take a look as its a blocker. -Alena.
Re: Blocker bug: can't create the volumes on Xen 6.2.0 on the latest 4.3
Any chance this is a vhd-util issue? This is the generic error I generally see when vhd-util isn’t in place or can’t be executed. -Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco Red Hat On Dec 9, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote: There is some regression bug on the latest 4.3 – volumes creation fails on xen 6.2.0. Steps made: 1) Deployed CS code and redeployed the DB 2) Added xen host to the CS 3) VDI creation fails with generic error message 2013-12-09 15:56:44,629 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2d667640) can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 2013-12-09 15:56:44,629 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2d667640) Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 Anthony, I wonder if it can be related to your latest changes. Can you please take a look as its a blocker. -Alena.
Re: Blocker bug: can't create the volumes on Xen 6.2.0 on the latest 4.3
That helped, thank you Min. It would be nice to get a notification email next time from the person making this kind of changes to save everybody else’s time on debugging. -Alena. On 12/9/13, 4:02 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote: Is this happening in your ssvm startup? If so, go to your xen host, /opt/cloud/bin folder, check if you have vhd-util there. Not sure why, it seems that we have changed the directory from previous /opt/xensources to /opt/cloud. I ran into a similar problem in starting up ssvm. Thanks -min On 12/9/13 3:58 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote: There is some regression bug on the latest 4.3 volumes creation fails on xen 6.2.0. Steps made: 1) Deployed CS code and redeployed the DB 2) Added xen host to the CS 3) VDI creation fails with generic error message 2013-12-09 15:56:44,629 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2d667640) can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 2013-12-09 15:56:44,629 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2d667640) Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 Anthony, I wonder if it can be related to your latest changes. Can you please take a look as its a blocker. -Alena.
Re: [4.3 BUG] Egress rules in Palo Alto
OK, I would take it. Thanks! --Sheng On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote: Hey all, There is currently a bug in the implementation of egress firewall rules in the Palo Alto plugin. Here is the bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5425 I have attached a patch for the 4.3 branch in the bug, but I don't think I have commit access, so I will need someone else to apply it. The patch 'should' work on both 4.3 and master, but if not, I will put together a patch for master. In this patch I have also addressed 'Issue 1' in this email thread: http://markmail.org/message/32tspuyjppk4llmi?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Eincubator%2Ecloudstack-%2A+Coverage+Analysis:+Few+Issues Let me know if you have any questions... Cheers, Will
Re: [4.3 BUG] Egress rules in Palo Alto
Thanks Sheng... Will On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote: OK, I would take it. Thanks! --Sheng On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote: Hey all, There is currently a bug in the implementation of egress firewall rules in the Palo Alto plugin. Here is the bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5425 I have attached a patch for the 4.3 branch in the bug, but I don't think I have commit access, so I will need someone else to apply it. The patch 'should' work on both 4.3 and master, but if not, I will put together a patch for master. In this patch I have also addressed 'Issue 1' in this email thread: http://markmail.org/message/32tspuyjppk4llmi?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Eincubator%2Ecloudstack-%2A+Coverage+Analysis:+Few+Issues Let me know if you have any questions... Cheers, Will
Re: [4.3 BUG] Egress rules in Palo Alto
Done, pushed to 4.3 and MASTER branch. --Sheng On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote: Thanks Sheng... Will On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote: OK, I would take it. Thanks! --Sheng On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote: Hey all, There is currently a bug in the implementation of egress firewall rules in the Palo Alto plugin. Here is the bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5425 I have attached a patch for the 4.3 branch in the bug, but I don't think I have commit access, so I will need someone else to apply it. The patch 'should' work on both 4.3 and master, but if not, I will put together a patch for master. In this patch I have also addressed 'Issue 1' in this email thread: http://markmail.org/message/32tspuyjppk4llmi?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Eincubator%2Ecloudstack-%2A+Coverage+Analysis:+Few+Issues Let me know if you have any questions... Cheers, Will
Re: [4.3 BUG] Egress rules in Palo Alto
Perfect. Thank you... On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote: Done, pushed to 4.3 and MASTER branch. --Sheng On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote: Thanks Sheng... Will On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote: OK, I would take it. Thanks! --Sheng On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote: Hey all, There is currently a bug in the implementation of egress firewall rules in the Palo Alto plugin. Here is the bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5425 I have attached a patch for the 4.3 branch in the bug, but I don't think I have commit access, so I will need someone else to apply it. The patch 'should' work on both 4.3 and master, but if not, I will put together a patch for master. In this patch I have also addressed 'Issue 1' in this email thread: http://markmail.org/message/32tspuyjppk4llmi?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Eincubator%2Ecloudstack-%2A+Coverage+Analysis:+Few+Issues Let me know if you have any questions... Cheers, Will
RE: Blocker bug: can't create the volumes on Xen 6.2.0 on the latest 4.3
Always put vhd-util in your cloudstack source tree, scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/ Anthony -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 4:49 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Anthony Xu Subject: Re: Blocker bug: can't create the volumes on Xen 6.2.0 on the latest 4.3 That helped, thank you Min. It would be nice to get a notification email next time from the person making this kind of changes to save everybody else's time on debugging. -Alena. On 12/9/13, 4:02 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote: Is this happening in your ssvm startup? If so, go to your xen host, /opt/cloud/bin folder, check if you have vhd-util there. Not sure why, it seems that we have changed the directory from previous /opt/xensources to /opt/cloud. I ran into a similar problem in starting up ssvm. Thanks -min On 12/9/13 3:58 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote: There is some regression bug on the latest 4.3 volumes creation fails on xen 6.2.0. Steps made: 1) Deployed CS code and redeployed the DB 2) Added xen host to the CS 3) VDI creation fails with generic error message 2013-12-09 15:56:44,629 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2d667640) can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 2013-12-09 15:56:44,629 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2d667640) Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 Anthony, I wonder if it can be related to your latest changes. Can you please take a look as its a blocker. -Alena.
RE: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs
I am +1 to make documentation easier but we just passed code freeze for 4.3 and I feel we need to do it after 4.3. Animesh -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 3:54 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath; msweet@gmail.com; Mike Tutkowski Subject: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs Hi, There has been lots of discussion about docs over the last 3/4 months, in summary the issues are: -Difficult to maintain and keep website up to date (issues with lang and issues with pdf formatting lately) -Difficult to contribute to easily, docbook is fine but tedious to work on. -Errors in the docs don't get properly fixed -Mix of OS information -Lack of content for certain features -Docs release cycle. Docs have bugs that will never get fixed in that specific release (because we see it as code release) To remedy some of those issues and work on a new release process specific to docs we moved the docs to its own repo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git *I propose that we move away from docbook and use a more readable format: restructuredtext* I have worked on a prototype that uses restructured text: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html This format makes it extremely easy to write docs. Existing docbook content could be converted to .rst using a tool like pandoc: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/ *In addition to changing the format I propose that we use readthedocs.org* This will help with the release and build of the docs. readthedocs grabs the docs from a git repo, builds html, pdf and epub. It can also maintain several releases. We can apply a specific -theme- to our docs. See a prototype here: http://cloudstack.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ *I propose that we move to this as early as 4.3 documentation* Assuming this proposal passes, we would need to: -re-architect the repo -create the proper cnames to be in accordance with trademark guidelines -we can decide what content to keep or not and convert what we keep. -decide how we organize the content -start accepting pull requests (noting that pages can be edited directly from github) -make a first release of this new doc site at the same time than 4.3 release. Thoughts, flames ? -Sebastien
Re: Blocker bug: can't create the volumes on Xen 6.2.0 on the latest 4.3
I see that for XS the location of script files in the host has changed from /opt/xensource/bin to /opt/cloud/bin. On latest master branch I see that the scripts are still getting placed in the old location while adding a host. Is there any commit missed out on master? -Koushik On 10-Dec-2013, at 8:06 AM, Anthony Xu xuefei...@citrix.com wrote: Always put vhd-util in your cloudstack source tree, scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/ Anthony -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 4:49 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Anthony Xu Subject: Re: Blocker bug: can't create the volumes on Xen 6.2.0 on the latest 4.3 That helped, thank you Min. It would be nice to get a notification email next time from the person making this kind of changes to save everybody else's time on debugging. -Alena. On 12/9/13, 4:02 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote: Is this happening in your ssvm startup? If so, go to your xen host, /opt/cloud/bin folder, check if you have vhd-util there. Not sure why, it seems that we have changed the directory from previous /opt/xensources to /opt/cloud. I ran into a similar problem in starting up ssvm. Thanks -min On 12/9/13 3:58 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote: There is some regression bug on the latest 4.3 volumes creation fails on xen 6.2.0. Steps made: 1) Deployed CS code and redeployed the DB 2) Added xen host to the CS 3) VDI creation fails with generic error message 2013-12-09 15:56:44,629 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2d667640) can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 2013-12-09 15:56:44,629 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2d667640) Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 734481f8-fee3-59d9-20e8-dbe3b8124a78 Anthony, I wonder if it can be related to your latest changes. Can you please take a look as its a blocker. -Alena.
Re: Review Request 16122: CLOUDSTACK-4498 cherry picked from 4.2
On Dec. 9, 2013, 6:03 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java, line 3007 https://reviews.apache.org/r/16122/diff/2/?file=395664#file395664line3007 Why are you reserving if the flag is false ? Hi Nitin, this patch is not related to the https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/. will upload it once this gets shipped. - bharat --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16122/#review30027 --- On Dec. 9, 2013, 10:39 a.m., bharat kumar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16122/ --- (Updated Dec. 9, 2013, 10:39 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4498 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4498 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-4498 we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false. Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/guru/VMwareGuru.java eb3cb6b plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareManagerImpl.java d306b74 plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java 69f1b74 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16122/diff/ Testing --- tested on master. Thanks, bharat kumar
Merge AutoScaling without NetScaler to MASTER
Dear guys, I already merged two features AutoScaling without NetScaler and also improving GRE source code to MASTER branch. Ping me for any problem. Cheers, --Tuna
[PROPOSAL] Cloudstack network-element plugin to orchestrate Juniper's switches (for L2 services)
Hi, my name is Pradeep HK and I am from Juniper Networks, Bangalore. I have prepared a Design Document for the feature mentioned in the subject. It is being targetted for 4.4. Pls review the Design document - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+network-element+plugin+to+orchestrate+Juniper%27s+switches+%28for+L2+services%29 and send me your comments -Pradeep
Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs
On Dec 9, 2013, at 9:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I am +1 to make documentation easier but we just passed code freeze for 4.3 and I feel we need to do it after 4.3. docs are not in the 4.3 code branch. it's different releases... Animesh -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 3:54 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath; msweet@gmail.com; Mike Tutkowski Subject: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs Hi, There has been lots of discussion about docs over the last 3/4 months, in summary the issues are: -Difficult to maintain and keep website up to date (issues with lang and issues with pdf formatting lately) -Difficult to contribute to easily, docbook is fine but tedious to work on. -Errors in the docs don't get properly fixed -Mix of OS information -Lack of content for certain features -Docs release cycle. Docs have bugs that will never get fixed in that specific release (because we see it as code release) To remedy some of those issues and work on a new release process specific to docs we moved the docs to its own repo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git *I propose that we move away from docbook and use a more readable format: restructuredtext* I have worked on a prototype that uses restructured text: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html This format makes it extremely easy to write docs. Existing docbook content could be converted to .rst using a tool like pandoc: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/ *In addition to changing the format I propose that we use readthedocs.org* This will help with the release and build of the docs. readthedocs grabs the docs from a git repo, builds html, pdf and epub. It can also maintain several releases. We can apply a specific -theme- to our docs. See a prototype here: http://cloudstack.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ *I propose that we move to this as early as 4.3 documentation* Assuming this proposal passes, we would need to: -re-architect the repo -create the proper cnames to be in accordance with trademark guidelines -we can decide what content to keep or not and convert what we keep. -decide how we organize the content -start accepting pull requests (noting that pages can be edited directly from github) -make a first release of this new doc site at the same time than 4.3 release. Thoughts, flames ? -Sebastien
