Review Request 22717: refactor StoragePoolAllocator#filter logic
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Mike Tutkowski and Prachi Damle. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- refactor StoragePoolAllocator#filter logic to enable hypervisor type check, storage type check for root volume and avoid list check, and to support IOPS capacity control in a cluster wide storage pool and a local storage pool. Diffs - engine/storage/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/allocator/AbstractStoragePoolAllocator.java ddbb5a4 engine/storage/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/allocator/ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator.java 8fb9c8d Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima
Re: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me
Prachi, Mike, I appreciate your comments. I think it is a bug that there is a difference between filter logic of ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator and that of ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator (ex. allocator skip iSCSI type storage pool or not when a volume is a RootDisk), I will unify by implementing it in AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter method. It is new information for me that managed storages only support zone level. Thank you for let me know. But when iopscapacity parameter is not set to a primary storage (i.e. unmanaged storage), storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops always returns true. I suppose calling storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops from AbstractStoragePoolAllocator will not cause a problem, and it will simplify the code. I created a patch to explain my thought. Could you review it? https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/ Regards, Noji 2014-06-17 19:19 GMT-06:00 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com: I can comment on the IOPS part. The IOPS are currently only relevant when using managed storage (which is currently only applicable at the zone level). That being the case, no cluster (or local) storage takes advantage of counting IOPS that have been handed out. Of course this logic might be expanded in the future, but that's how it works today. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote: Why ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator implements filter method (and doesn't call that of base class) rather than just using that of base class? ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter method seems doesn't care avoid parameter, doesn't skip iSCSI type storage pool even if a volume is a RootDisk. The first question seems like a bug to me. I am not sure about the IOPS Prachi -Original Message- From: ynoj...@ynojima.net [mailto:ynoj...@ynojima.net] On Behalf Of Yoshikazu Nojima Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 1:07 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me Hi, ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me. ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator and ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator are allocator classes to select storage pool. They extends AbstractStoragePoolAllocator class, which provides filter method to exclude unavailable storage pools. Why ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator implements filter method (and doesn't call that of base class) rather than just using that of base class? ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter method seems doesn't care avoid parameter, doesn't skip iSCSI type storage pool even if a volume is a RootDisk. (These functions are implemented in AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter method, which used by ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator.) On the other hand, AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter doesn't call storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops, so a cluster wide primary storage would be allocated more volumes than its designated IOPS capacity. Is there any difference between a zone wide primary storage and a cluster wide primary storage except its scope? If it is a bug, I'll fix it. Regards, Noji -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: Review Request 20316: CLOUDSTACK-1466: Adding automation test cases for Primary Storage Limits
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/#review46043 --- Commit a0f19d4bd5d7bec6613aa8130b3da9ecffc71d0b in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from Gaurav Aradhye [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=a0f19d4 ] CLOUDSTACK-1466: Automation - Priamary Storage Limits - ASF Subversion and Git Services On June 18, 2014, 4:06 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 4:06 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-1466 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1466 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Adding test suits in Primary Storage Limits test cases. 1)Root/Domain admin limits 2)Domain Limits 3)Resize volume 4)Project Limits 5)Maximum Limits Diffs - test/integration/component/test_ps_domain_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_max_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_project_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_resize_volume.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/codes.py ef49c0c tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py 8b89087 tools/marvin/marvin/lib/common.py 7753385 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/diff/ Testing --- Yes Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 22510: [Windows] Can not create Template from ROOT snapshot. Fixed the same by adding pathSeparator to the DataStoreTO.java
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22510/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 6:50 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Koushik Das, and Min Chen. Changes --- Commit message changes to explicitly mention that changes are related to XenServer/NFS only. Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6636 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6636 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Due to File.separator on windows machine the template creation from snapshot is failing as it has mis-matched path separator which is windows path separator(\). Fixed the same by adding getPathSeparator() method to DataStoreTO.java and all it's implementations. Diffs (updated) - api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/DataStoreTO.java 8d47adc api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/NfsTO.java 1c9ee38 api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/S3TO.java f64fe35 api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/SwiftTO.java 3b76dad core/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/to/ImageStoreTO.java 93c62f6 core/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/to/PrimaryDataStoreTO.java 29e53b0 plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/XenServerStorageProcessor.java e96ebf4 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22510/diff/ Testing --- Tested on Windows 2012 R2 server and on centos. Tested the following use cases. 1. Attach ISO 2. Detach ISO 3. Snapshot creation from root disk 4. Snapshot creation from data disk 5. volume creation from (3) 6. template creation from(3) 7. Launch a VM after registering new template. Thanks, Damodar Reddy Talakanti
Re: [GSOC 2014]Create GUI to add primary storage based on plug-ins
hi seif, may i know the status of the GSoC primary storage UI project you are currently working on. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Create+GUI+to+add+primary+storage+based+on+plug-ins if you can loop me, i will be able to contribute. thank you. On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks for the code, Punith! Seif is someone I met about a year ago. I plan to mentor his work for GSoC, but we'd definitely be happy for any input you or others have. On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Seif Eddine Jemli seifeddineje...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Punith! 2014-03-21 10:38 GMT+01:00 Punith S punit...@cloudbyte.com: hi seif, its cool you took this up, this would make admins to create primary storage pool with respect to different storage vendors plugin using cloudstack UI. you can start off by looking at the createStoragepool api's parameters in 4.4 and above, all you have to do is when user ticks the managed storage , list the storage providers and display the additional input for params of createStoragePool api , ie. capacityIops, capacityBytes and Details map. i have already tweaked the system.js script file in 4.2 for myself, i have attached it so you can refer it. thanks. On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Seif Eddine Jemli seifeddineje...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, I am Seif Eddine Jemli, a Tunisian student in a french computer science engineergin college (the ENSEIRB-MATMECA grande ecole). For GSOC 2014, I'm interested in looking at the JIRA Ticket CLOUDSTACK-6045 :CreateGUI to add primary storage based on plug-in. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6045 My full proposal can be found on Google Melange at: * http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/public/google/gsoc2014/sjemli/5629499534213120 http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/public/google/gsoc2014/sjemli/5629499534213120 * I am relying on your advices and suggestions! Thanks, Seif -- regards, punith s cloudbyte.com -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- regards, punith s cloudbyte.com
[POLL] Who uses awsapi with CloudStack in production?
Hi, Who uses awsapi or any other EC2 compatible interface such as ec2stack with CloudStack (or CloudStack distros such as Citrix CloudPlatform) in production? And, if marketing and publicity are/were big motivation(s)? In case you don't want to discuss on this thread, please take this anonymous poll: http://www.polljunkie.com/poll/fbyfdc/who-uses-awsapi-with-cloudstack-in-prouduction # Some stats I've been watching Collab14 videos and found references where many speakers reference overall CloudStack codebase to be about 1.5M (million) lines of Java code which is not exactly true. Let me share some findings; - As of today, CloudStack master is about 1.7M lines of Java code [1] - CloudStack awsapi artifact is 1.04M lines of Java code [2] - Code excluding awsapi, tests and license/comment is about 590k lines of Java code [3] - The core excluding plugins, api and the above is about 300k lines of Java code [4] Why should I care: - some useful/fun stats to keep in mind - it's not a giant mammoth that cannot be fixed or developed upon - encouraging for new developers that if they try they can understand and fix it FYI, this started on twitter yesterday: https://twitter.com/_bhaisaab/status/479007075414974465 [1] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [2] cd cloudstack-repo find awsapi | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [3] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [tT]est | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l [4] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [Tt]est | grep -v plugins | grep -v api | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l Regards.
[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-install pull request: corrected the java version t...
Github user runseb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/15#issuecomment-46403171 thanks for the patch, I applied to master --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-install pull request: corrected the java version t...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/15 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: Review Request 22627: CLOUDSTACK-6906: Fixed volume resize BVT failure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22627/#review46044 --- Commit e65b746b346f33fc4f879479f7e45a081e06f90a in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from Gaurav Aradhye [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=e65b746 ] CLOUDSTACK-6906: Fixed volume resize BVT failure - ASF Subversion and Git Services On June 18, 2014, 3:22 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22627/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 3:22 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6906 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6906 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The disk offering used while resizing volume was not custom. Changed it to custom disk offering so that resize is possible without creating new disk offering. Diffs - test/integration/smoke/test_volumes.py 2e41aa7 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22627/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 22627: CLOUDSTACK-6906: Fixed volume resize BVT failure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22627/#review46045 --- Commit 8aea23a4e36559e8113d7bc0427aa950ae8082eb in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from Gaurav Aradhye [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=8aea23a ] CLOUDSTACK-6906: Fixed volume resize BVT failure - ASF Subversion and Git Services On June 18, 2014, 3:22 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22627/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 3:22 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6906 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6906 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The disk offering used while resizing volume was not custom. Changed it to custom disk offering so that resize is possible without creating new disk offering. Diffs - test/integration/smoke/test_volumes.py 2e41aa7 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22627/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 22614: CLOUDSTACK-6887: Code enhancement to ensure better cleanup
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22614/#review46046 --- Commit 588e3e37afdd5740816d1225d449164ed2024c03 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from Gaurav Aradhye [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=588e3e3 ] CLOUDSTACK-6887: Code enhancement to ensure better cleanup - ASF Subversion and Git Services On June 18, 2014, 3:22 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22614/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 3:22 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6887 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6887 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Adding patch fixing few more test suites for better cleanup. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_accounts.py f71dea5 test/integration/component/test_add_remove_network.py 7479cee test/integration/component/test_affinity_groups.py d0fa2f7 test/integration/component/test_portable_ip.py 538318d test/integration/component/test_vpc_network.py a449948 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22614/diff/ Testing --- Tested with python command. Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 22614: CLOUDSTACK-6887: Code enhancement to ensure better cleanup
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22614/#review46047 --- Commit 942fc98848855c5ff2f177b251a44b1f2b971a57 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from Gaurav Aradhye [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=942fc98 ] CLOUDSTACK-6887: Code enhancement to ensure better cleanup - ASF Subversion and Git Services On June 18, 2014, 3:22 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22614/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 3:22 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6887 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6887 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Adding patch fixing few more test suites for better cleanup. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_accounts.py f71dea5 test/integration/component/test_add_remove_network.py 7479cee test/integration/component/test_affinity_groups.py d0fa2f7 test/integration/component/test_portable_ip.py 538318d test/integration/component/test_vpc_network.py a449948 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22614/diff/ Testing --- Tested with python command. Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 20316: CLOUDSTACK-1466: Adding automation test cases for Primary Storage Limits
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 1:10 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Santhosh Edukulla. Changes --- Adding Rebased patch for master. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-1466 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1466 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Adding test suits in Primary Storage Limits test cases. 1)Root/Domain admin limits 2)Domain Limits 3)Resize volume 4)Project Limits 5)Maximum Limits Diffs - test/integration/component/test_ps_domain_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_max_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_project_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_resize_volume.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/codes.py ef49c0c tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py 8b89087 tools/marvin/marvin/lib/common.py 7753385 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/diff/ Testing --- Yes File Attachments (updated) Patch for master branch https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/06/18/5fc8afc6-212b-49dd-a83f-20dc56008c39__0001-CLOUDSTACK-1466-Automatiion-Primary-Storage-Limits-t.patch Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 20316: CLOUDSTACK-1466: Adding automation test cases for Primary Storage Limits
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 1:12 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-1466 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1466 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Adding test suits in Primary Storage Limits test cases. 1)Root/Domain admin limits 2)Domain Limits 3)Resize volume 4)Project Limits 5)Maximum Limits Diffs - test/integration/component/test_ps_domain_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_max_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_project_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_resize_volume.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/codes.py ef49c0c tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py 8b89087 tools/marvin/marvin/lib/common.py 7753385 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/diff/ Testing --- Yes File Attachments (updated) Rebased patch for master https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/06/18/fa7c2219-3cd8-49af-a8eb-2c8c7125ef34__0001-CLOUDSTACK-1466-Automatiion-Primary-Storage-Limits-t.patch Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 20316: CLOUDSTACK-1466: Adding automation test cases for Primary Storage Limits
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/#review46049 --- Commit e7fe391be4076309a9dc9a0f9bf8ea58181dfa12 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from Gaurav Aradhye [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=e7fe391 ] CLOUDSTACK-1466: Automatiion - Primary Storage Limits test cases - ASF Subversion and Git Services On June 18, 2014, 7:42 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 7:42 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-1466 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1466 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Adding test suits in Primary Storage Limits test cases. 1)Root/Domain admin limits 2)Domain Limits 3)Resize volume 4)Project Limits 5)Maximum Limits Diffs - test/integration/component/test_ps_domain_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_max_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_project_limits.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_ps_resize_volume.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/codes.py ef49c0c tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py 8b89087 tools/marvin/marvin/lib/common.py 7753385 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/diff/ Testing --- Yes File Attachments Rebased patch for master https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/06/18/fa7c2219-3cd8-49af-a8eb-2c8c7125ef34__0001-CLOUDSTACK-1466-Automatiion-Primary-Storage-Limits-t.patch Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Review Request 22718: Fixing identation issue in marvin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22718/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Fixing indentation issue introduced in patch: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/ Diffs - tools/marvin/marvin/lib/common.py 42ffc51 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22718/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: [ACS431][QUESTION] db upgrace
So far it is the same as 4.3.0 - 4.4.0 On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote: 4.3.1 - 4.4.0 upgrade also needs to be handled. -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 17 June 2014 9:16 PM To: dev Subject: [ACS431][QUESTION] db upgrace In my simple mind it seems we only need to create a Upgrade430to431.java file and don't need any sql files. Is this going to fly? AFAICT the only thing to go in there is the vlan fixup in the vlan table, which is a data migration and not a schema change. Can anyone point out to me the error in my ways, please? thanks, -- Daan -- Daan
Re: Review Request 22510: [Windows] Can not create Template from ROOT snapshot. Fixed the same by adding pathSeparator to the DataStoreTO.java
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22510/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 9:41 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Koushik Das, and Min Chen. Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6636 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6636 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Due to File.separator on windows machine the template creation from snapshot is failing as it has mis-matched path separator which is windows path separator(\). Fixed the same by adding getPathSeparator() method to DataStoreTO.java and all it's implementations. Diffs (updated) - api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/DataStoreTO.java 8d47adc api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/NfsTO.java 1c9ee38 api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/S3TO.java f64fe35 api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/SwiftTO.java 3b76dad core/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/to/ImageStoreTO.java 93c62f6 core/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/to/PrimaryDataStoreTO.java 29e53b0 plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/XenServerStorageProcessor.java e96ebf4 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22510/diff/ Testing --- Tested on Windows 2012 R2 server and on centos. Tested the following use cases. 1. Attach ISO 2. Detach ISO 3. Snapshot creation from root disk 4. Snapshot creation from data disk 5. volume creation from (3) 6. template creation from(3) 7. Launch a VM after registering new template. Thanks, Damodar Reddy Talakanti
Review Request 22721: removed hard coded jdk_dirs in cloud-usage script
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22721/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala and Rayees Namathponnan. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6926 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6926 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- used to readlink -e and dirname to get the JAVA_HOME if JAVA_HOME is not already defined, sets it to jdk home if javac is present else jre home if java is present. if nothing is present, it exits with error Diffs - packaging/centos63/cloud-usage.rc 6170379 packaging/debian/init/cloud-usage 1cc75cc Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22721/diff/ Testing --- tested it when java is not installed, jre is installed, jdk installed or when a older version is installed on centos 6.4 and ubuntu 14.04 Thanks, Rajani Karuturi
Re: Xen Project support and state of APIs
Hi Tim, On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Tim, Thanks for replying, let me clean up everything and re-setup my test infra after my $dayjob hours and get back to you. The test cases in the design doc does not discuss Xen Project so I thought I should ask if ACS works with Xen Project 4.x. The longer term objective is to provide support for XenProject without XAPI, most notably with libvirt. Effectively XenServer implies XAPI and XenProject would imply libvirt as the tooling. Alright, that means we need to start working on a Xen Project hypervisor plugin that would (re)use libvirt (or libxl) tooling, probably re-use/fix the KVM agent too. The Xen/XenProject/XenServer/XAPI/XCP is confusing [1]. From what I understand, XCP was some sort of an opensource version of XenServer, but since XenServer distribution (which consists of Xen, XenCenter, XAPI, Linux etc.) is opensource, XCP has been discontinued since 1.6 release? XCP was rolled into XenServer as of XenServer 6.2 which means 1.6 was the last version of XCP. I tried to sum it up in this blog: http://open.citrix.com/blog/342-knowing-what-you-ve-got-avoiding-the-xen-vs-xenserver-confusion.html Thanks, this helps to understand what went in this transition. Now, on many Linux distro XAPI is still available as 'xcp-xapi' such as in Debian/Ubuntu, so what package(s) do you suggest one needs to install and configure so I can get DevCloud [2] work again? DevCloud is a VM that runs Xen (Xen Project) inside it and can be used as a virtual host to test/develop ACS against it. I see no reason why any other XAPI implementation wouldn't work, but it's entirely possible the version of xcp-xapi you have has issues with XenProject 4.4 due to normal versioning type issues. There also was a different productization attempt called xenserver-core, but that looks to have died on the vine. That being said, I could easily have broken something. If I've broken something, I probably won't be able to test until next week due to travels. The question of xapi inclusion in distros is one I'd need to check on. Yes, that would be great. I'll attempt testing it again with fresh setup in upcoming weekends. Regards. [1] http://www.xenproject.org/developers/teams/xapi.html [2] http://bhaisaab.org/logs/devcloud Regards. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, We've only supported xapi so far, so I'm curious if you had Xen Project 4.4 working before with xapi and if that is now broken. Nothing I did should have impacted that, but it wasn't in my test suite so anything is possible On Jun 17, 2014 11:21 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Xen Project (previously xen.org xenserver) is widely accessible in several Linux distributions such as Arch, Fedora etc. Therefore, people may want to use it instead of XenServer (6.2 or later). The ACS 4.5 design doc [1] explains about XenServer and how it should be tested etc. but what about using Xen Project? Since the recent Xen plugin refactoring as xenserver plugin [1], I'm unable to get ACS to work with Xen Project 4.4 (on a real host and on a new custom DevCloud). Using the XenServer ACS plugin, it identifies a Xen Project host as some version of Xen but then fails. Has anyone tried this with ACS 4.4/master? Are we going to test/support Xen Project (4.x) soon? If so, can people involved share their plan/vision/roadmap on it? Lastly, as the design doc [1] suggested XCP's development has stopped, are we going to favour using XAPI [1] now or libVirt [2] or something else? [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Convert+Xen+usage+to+XenServer [2] http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/03/10/xen-4-4-released Regards.
Re: Review Request 22554: CLOUDSTACK-6909 - fix marvin's handling of SMB credentials for storage
On June 17, 2014, 5:43 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 240
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22554/diff/2/?file=609404#file609404line240
Why specifically this?
Because primary.details is a JSONLoader class and primarycmd needs a
dictionary. This converts between them.
- John
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22554/#review45910
---
On June 13, 2014, 4:53 p.m., John Dilley wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22554/
---
(Updated June 13, 2014, 4:53 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6909
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6909
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
Fix marvin's handling of details field for primary and secondary storage to
cope with SMB credentials. This allows Hyper-V to work.
Diffs
-
tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py 22b78ab
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22554/diff/
Testing
---
Tested deploydataCenter with this JSON:
{
dbSvr:{
dbSvr:10.220.137.39,
passwd:cloud,
db:cloud,
port:3306,
user:cloud
},
zones:[
{
name:XenRT-Zone-0,
guestcidraddress:192.168.200.0/24,
dns1:10.220.160.11,
physical_networks:[
{
XRT_VLANRangeSize:10,
name:AdvPhyNetwork,
providers:[
{
broadcastdomainrange:ZONE,
name:VirtualRouter
},
{
broadcastdomainrange:ZONE,
name:VpcVirtualRouter
},
{
broadcastdomainrange:ZONE,
name:InternalLbVm
}
],
broadcastdomainrange:Zone,
vlan:3000-3009,
traffictypes:[
{
typ:Guest
},
{
typ:Management
},
{
typ:Public
}
],
isolationmethods:[
VLAN
]
}
],
ipranges:[
{
startip:10.220.164.0,
endip:10.220.164.9,
netmask:255.255.240.0,
XRT_GuestIPRangeSize:10,
gateway:10.220.160.1
}
],
networktype:Advanced,
pods:[
{
XRT_PodIPRangeSize:10,
name:XenRT-Zone-0-Pod-0,
endip:10.220.164.39,
startip:10.220.164.30,
netmask:255.255.240.0,
clusters:[
{
XRT_HyperVHostIds:0,
clustername:XenRT-Zone-0-Pod-0-Cluster-0,
hypervisor:hyperv,
primaryStorages:[
{
url:cifs://10.220.163.45/storage/primary,
name:XenRT-Zone-0-Pod-0-Primary-Store,
details:[
{
user:Administrator
},
{
password:xenroot01T
},
{
domain:XSQA
}
]
}
],
clustertype:CloudManaged,
hosts:[
{
url:http://10.220.163.45;,
username:root,
password:xenroot
}
],
XRT_Hosts:1
}
],
gateway:10.220.160.1
}
],
internaldns1:10.220.160.11,
secondaryStorages:[
{
url:cifs://10.220.163.45/storage/secondary,
details:{
domain:XSQA,
password:xenroot01T,
user:Administrator
},
provider:SMB
}
]
}
],
mgtSvr:[
{
mgtSvrIp:10.220.137.39,
passwd:xenroot,
port:8096,
user:root
}
]
}
[ACS4.4] Cherry-pick
Daan, Request to cherry-pick 21e452ff4f0459422f0612f2ddf7033a963b0a19 Thanks Rajesh Battala
Reset VM and it's gone - how do I get rid of this button??
Hi, A colleague just wiped out a VM because he thought that buttong reboots the virtual machine... Is there any way I can butcher the UI and remove that button or at least rename it to Reinstall VM or similar? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: Xen Project support and state of APIs
On Jun 18, 2014, at 12:28 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi Tim, On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Tim, Thanks for replying, let me clean up everything and re-setup my test infra after my $dayjob hours and get back to you. The test cases in the design doc does not discuss Xen Project so I thought I should ask if ACS works with Xen Project 4.x. The longer term objective is to provide support for XenProject without XAPI, most notably with libvirt. Effectively XenServer implies XAPI and XenProject would imply libvirt as the tooling. Alright, that means we need to start working on a Xen Project hypervisor plugin that would (re)use libvirt (or libxl) tooling, probably re-use/fix the KVM agent too. there is on-going work about this: http://markmail.org/thread/sxezpziog2koewlt The Xen/XenProject/XenServer/XAPI/XCP is confusing [1]. From what I understand, XCP was some sort of an opensource version of XenServer, but since XenServer distribution (which consists of Xen, XenCenter, XAPI, Linux etc.) is opensource, XCP has been discontinued since 1.6 release? XCP was rolled into XenServer as of XenServer 6.2 which means 1.6 was the last version of XCP. I tried to sum it up in this blog: http://open.citrix.com/blog/342-knowing-what-you-ve-got-avoiding-the-xen-vs-xenserver-confusion.html Thanks, this helps to understand what went in this transition. Now, on many Linux distro XAPI is still available as 'xcp-xapi' such as in Debian/Ubuntu, so what package(s) do you suggest one needs to install and configure so I can get DevCloud [2] work again? DevCloud is a VM that runs Xen (Xen Project) inside it and can be used as a virtual host to test/develop ACS against it. I see no reason why any other XAPI implementation wouldn't work, but it's entirely possible the version of xcp-xapi you have has issues with XenProject 4.4 due to normal versioning type issues. There also was a different productization attempt called xenserver-core, but that looks to have died on the vine. That being said, I could easily have broken something. If I've broken something, I probably won't be able to test until next week due to travels. The question of xapi inclusion in distros is one I'd need to check on. Yes, that would be great. I'll attempt testing it again with fresh setup in upcoming weekends. Regards. [1] http://www.xenproject.org/developers/teams/xapi.html [2] http://bhaisaab.org/logs/devcloud Regards. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, We've only supported xapi so far, so I'm curious if you had Xen Project 4.4 working before with xapi and if that is now broken. Nothing I did should have impacted that, but it wasn't in my test suite so anything is possible On Jun 17, 2014 11:21 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Xen Project (previously xen.org xenserver) is widely accessible in several Linux distributions such as Arch, Fedora etc. Therefore, people may want to use it instead of XenServer (6.2 or later). The ACS 4.5 design doc [1] explains about XenServer and how it should be tested etc. but what about using Xen Project? Since the recent Xen plugin refactoring as xenserver plugin [1], I'm unable to get ACS to work with Xen Project 4.4 (on a real host and on a new custom DevCloud). Using the XenServer ACS plugin, it identifies a Xen Project host as some version of Xen but then fails. Has anyone tried this with ACS 4.4/master? Are we going to test/support Xen Project (4.x) soon? If so, can people involved share their plan/vision/roadmap on it? Lastly, as the design doc [1] suggested XCP's development has stopped, are we going to favour using XAPI [1] now or libVirt [2] or something else? [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Convert+Xen+usage+to+XenServer [2] http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/03/10/xen-4-4-released Regards.
Review Request 22725: CLOUDSTACK-6932: Removing redundant file test_escalations.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22725/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6932 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6932 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- test_escalations.py file has already been divided into different test suites such as test_escalations_instances.py test_escalations_isos.py test_escalations_snapshots.py test_escalations_volumes.py test_escalations_ipaddresses.py test_escalations_networks.py test_escalations_securitygroups.py test_escalations_templates.py test_escalations_vpncustomergateways.py so the parent file needs to be removed from the repo. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_escalations.py 1b596a7 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22725/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 22725: CLOUDSTACK-6932: Removing redundant file test_escalations.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22725/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 4:38 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Changes --- Adding patch for master Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6932 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6932 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- test_escalations.py file has already been divided into different test suites such as test_escalations_instances.py test_escalations_isos.py test_escalations_snapshots.py test_escalations_volumes.py test_escalations_ipaddresses.py test_escalations_networks.py test_escalations_securitygroups.py test_escalations_templates.py test_escalations_vpncustomergateways.py so the parent file needs to be removed from the repo. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_escalations.py 1b596a7 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22725/diff/ Testing --- File Attachments (updated) Patch for master https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/06/18/a6eb3655-f839-4d1b-9387-152fc7949478__0001-CLOUDSTACK-6932-Removing-redundant-file-test_escalat.patch Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Reset VM and it's gone - how do I get rid of this button??
Grep said to replace this in webapps/client/scripts/instances.js and it seems to be working. Is there anything else I need to watch out for? Additionally, can we add this in 4.3.1/4.4/master? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 18 June, 2014 11:56:52 AM Subject: Reset VM and it's gone - how do I get rid of this button?? Hi, A colleague just wiped out a VM because he thought that buttong reboots the virtual machine... Is there any way I can butcher the UI and remove that button or at least rename it to Reinstall VM or similar? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
RE: Reset VM and it's gone - how do I get rid of this button??
Some changes came as part of this : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6272 May give you some pointers. Brian/Jessica can be of help. Thanks, Saksham -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 4:27 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Reset VM and it's gone - how do I get rid of this button?? Hi, A colleague just wiped out a VM because he thought that buttong reboots the virtual machine... Is there any way I can butcher the UI and remove that button or at least rename it to Reinstall VM or similar? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: Xen Project support and state of APIs
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:32 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: there is on-going work about this: http://markmail.org/thread/sxezpziog2koewlt Thanks for this Sebastien, re-reading them. I saw the emails but I could not understand the email thread and had the Xen/XenServer/Xen Project confusion at the time. Regards. The Xen/XenProject/XenServer/XAPI/XCP is confusing [1]. From what I understand, XCP was some sort of an opensource version of XenServer, but since XenServer distribution (which consists of Xen, XenCenter, XAPI, Linux etc.) is opensource, XCP has been discontinued since 1.6 release? XCP was rolled into XenServer as of XenServer 6.2 which means 1.6 was the last version of XCP. I tried to sum it up in this blog: http://open.citrix.com/blog/342-knowing-what-you-ve-got-avoiding-the-xen-vs-xenserver-confusion.html Thanks, this helps to understand what went in this transition. Now, on many Linux distro XAPI is still available as 'xcp-xapi' such as in Debian/Ubuntu, so what package(s) do you suggest one needs to install and configure so I can get DevCloud [2] work again? DevCloud is a VM that runs Xen (Xen Project) inside it and can be used as a virtual host to test/develop ACS against it. I see no reason why any other XAPI implementation wouldn't work, but it's entirely possible the version of xcp-xapi you have has issues with XenProject 4.4 due to normal versioning type issues. There also was a different productization attempt called xenserver-core, but that looks to have died on the vine. That being said, I could easily have broken something. If I've broken something, I probably won't be able to test until next week due to travels. The question of xapi inclusion in distros is one I'd need to check on. Yes, that would be great. I'll attempt testing it again with fresh setup in upcoming weekends. Regards. [1] http://www.xenproject.org/developers/teams/xapi.html [2] http://bhaisaab.org/logs/devcloud Regards. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, We've only supported xapi so far, so I'm curious if you had Xen Project 4.4 working before with xapi and if that is now broken. Nothing I did should have impacted that, but it wasn't in my test suite so anything is possible On Jun 17, 2014 11:21 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Xen Project (previously xen.org xenserver) is widely accessible in several Linux distributions such as Arch, Fedora etc. Therefore, people may want to use it instead of XenServer (6.2 or later). The ACS 4.5 design doc [1] explains about XenServer and how it should be tested etc. but what about using Xen Project? Since the recent Xen plugin refactoring as xenserver plugin [1], I'm unable to get ACS to work with Xen Project 4.4 (on a real host and on a new custom DevCloud). Using the XenServer ACS plugin, it identifies a Xen Project host as some version of Xen but then fails. Has anyone tried this with ACS 4.4/master? Are we going to test/support Xen Project (4.x) soon? If so, can people involved share their plan/vision/roadmap on it? Lastly, as the design doc [1] suggested XCP's development has stopped, are we going to favour using XAPI [1] now or libVirt [2] or something else? [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Convert+Xen+usage+to+XenServer [2] http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/03/10/xen-4-4-released Regards.
Re: Review Request 22725: CLOUDSTACK-6932: Removing redundant file test_escalations.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22725/#review46063 --- Commit 7e4303821570d58ad962c85a1a3bd6dbf32f8d73 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from Gaurav Aradhye [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=7e43038 ] CLOUDSTACK-6932: Removing redundant file test_escalations.py - ASF Subversion and Git Services On June 18, 2014, 11:08 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22725/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 11:08 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6932 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6932 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- test_escalations.py file has already been divided into different test suites such as test_escalations_instances.py test_escalations_isos.py test_escalations_snapshots.py test_escalations_volumes.py test_escalations_ipaddresses.py test_escalations_networks.py test_escalations_securitygroups.py test_escalations_templates.py test_escalations_vpncustomergateways.py so the parent file needs to be removed from the repo. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_escalations.py 1b596a7 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22725/diff/ Testing --- File Attachments Patch for master https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/06/18/a6eb3655-f839-4d1b-9387-152fc7949478__0001-CLOUDSTACK-6932-Removing-redundant-file-test_escalat.patch Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 22725: CLOUDSTACK-6932: Removing redundant file test_escalations.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22725/#review46064 --- Commit aa5572c0ee5efcc6431b7a48e342b157e5fd33ac in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from Gaurav Aradhye [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=aa5572c ] CLOUDSTACK-6932: Removing redundant file test_escalations.py - ASF Subversion and Git Services On June 18, 2014, 11:08 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22725/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 11:08 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6932 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6932 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- test_escalations.py file has already been divided into different test suites such as test_escalations_instances.py test_escalations_isos.py test_escalations_snapshots.py test_escalations_volumes.py test_escalations_ipaddresses.py test_escalations_networks.py test_escalations_securitygroups.py test_escalations_templates.py test_escalations_vpncustomergateways.py so the parent file needs to be removed from the repo. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_escalations.py 1b596a7 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22725/diff/ Testing --- File Attachments Patch for master https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/06/18/a6eb3655-f839-4d1b-9387-152fc7949478__0001-CLOUDSTACK-6932-Removing-redundant-file-test_escalat.patch Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Reset VM and it's gone - how do I get rid of this button??
On Jun 18, 2014, at 1:05 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Grep said to replace this in webapps/client/scripts/instances.js and it seems to be working. Is there anything else I need to watch out for? Additionally, can we add this in 4.3.1/4.4/master? Looks like it's in 4.4 and master: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6272 I will cherry pick to 4.3 -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 18 June, 2014 11:56:52 AM Subject: Reset VM and it's gone - how do I get rid of this button?? Hi, A colleague just wiped out a VM because he thought that buttong reboots the virtual machine... Is there any way I can butcher the UI and remove that button or at least rename it to Reinstall VM or similar? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: [ACS4.4] Cherry-pick
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: 21e452ff4f0459422f0612f2ddf7033a963b0a19 there was a little conflict, which was easily resolved but please double check! -- Daan
Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #355
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/355/changes Changes: [Daan Hoogland] CLOUDSTACK-6920 Support listing of LBHealthcheck policy with LBHealthcheck policy ID -- [...truncated 1205 lines...] Results : Tests run: 33, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Framework - Jobs 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/framework/jobs/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/framework/jobs (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Compiling 33 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/framework/jobs/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 4 resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Compiling 4 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/framework/jobs/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-framework-jobs --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/framework/jobs/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Results : Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Internal Components API 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/engine/components-api/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/engine/components-api (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] Compiling 31 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/engine/components-api/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/engine/components-api/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] No sources to compile [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-components-api --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/engine/components-api/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S
Re: Reset VM and it's gone - how do I get rid of this button??
On Jun 18, 2014, at 1:17 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 18, 2014, at 1:05 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Grep said to replace this in webapps/client/scripts/instances.js and it seems to be working. Is there anything else I need to watch out for? Additionally, can we add this in 4.3.1/4.4/master? Looks like it's in 4.4 and master: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6272 I will cherry pick to 4.3 Done, looks like 'reset' becomes 'reinstall' -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 18 June, 2014 11:56:52 AM Subject: Reset VM and it's gone - how do I get rid of this button?? Hi, A colleague just wiped out a VM because he thought that buttong reboots the virtual machine... Is there any way I can butcher the UI and remove that button or at least rename it to Reinstall VM or similar? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: [ACS4.4] Cherry-pick
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : [INFO] -- --- [ERROR] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/server/src/com/cloud/network/lb/LoadBalancingRulesManagerImpl.java:[174,7] error: LoadBalancingRulesManagerImpl is not abstract and does not override abstract method findLbByStickinessId(long) in LoadBalancingRulesService I didn't run a test build :( should I revert or do you have an implementation of the method laying around? On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: 21e452ff4f0459422f0612f2ddf7033a963b0a19 there was a little conflict, which was easily resolved but please double check! -- Daan -- Daan
RE: [ACS4.4] Cherry-pick
Am working on it. -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 5:01 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [ACS4.4] Cherry-pick [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : [INFO] -- --- [ERROR] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/server/src/com/cloud/network/lb/LoadBalancingRulesManagerImpl.java:[174,7] error: LoadBalancingRulesManagerImpl is not abstract and does not override abstract method findLbByStickinessId(long) in LoadBalancingRulesService I didn't run a test build :( should I revert or do you have an implementation of the method laying around? On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: 21e452ff4f0459422f0612f2ddf7033a963b0a19 there was a little conflict, which was easily resolved but please double check! -- Daan -- Daan
cloud spec for mysql-ha connector (was: off list)
H devs,
I had an offline discussion about a classloader problem [1] and an
analog discussion with Hugo. It seems we want to create an extra rpm
that must be installed when mysql ha is required. This will be
specified in the cloud.spec file and will result in an extra package
when -Dnoredist is used. On installation this would have to
specifically be installed along with the rest if so desired.
A similar construct has to be devised for debian and windows
installations. Can the respective gurus in those fields look at that?
thanks,
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6928
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Damoder Reddy
damoder.re...@citrix.com wrote:
Ok I forgot the DEB builds.
To satisfy both, this should be included in catalina.properties.in.
But only question I have is how do we change it for each version and taking
care of upgrades as well.
Thanks Regards
Damodar/
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 3:10 PM
To: Damoder Reddy
Cc: sebgoa; Adrian Lewis
Subject: Re: off list
But only for the noredist version? and how about the deb version?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Damoder Reddy damoder.re...@citrix.com
wrote:
We can put this step as part of rpm creation in cloud.spec file.
Thanks Regards
Damodar/
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 2:59 PM
To: Damoder Reddy
Cc: sebgoa; Adrian Lewis
Subject: Re: off list
The 'just' in 'Just put a symbolic link' implies a install instruction, does
it? Or can we automate this step?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Damoder Reddy damoder.re...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi,
There are 2 solutions.
one either change the catalina.properties to include strategy in the
common.loader as suggested in another thread mail
OR
Just put a symbolic link to the jar file inside
/usr/share/tomcat6/lib as this path is already loaded by common.loader
(common.loader=${catalina.base}/lib,${catalina.base}/lib/*.jar,${catalina.home}/lib,${catalina.home}/lib/*.jar,/usr/share/java/mysql-connector-java.jar).
I think 2nd option is better instead of 1st one.
Thanks Regards
Damodar/
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 2:37 PM
To: sebgoa
Cc: Damoder Reddy; Adrian Lewis
Subject: Re: off list
had Adrians address wrong
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: off list
To: sebgoa run...@gmail.com
Cc: Damoder Reddy damoder.re...@citrix.com, Adrian Lewis
adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk
I had a quick look. it doesn't seem a coding issue but a
configuration/packaging issue. the file catalina.properties.in must be
adjusted for this. There are two in the project. One for the ui, which I
think won't need to be touched and one for the server. Damoder Reddy helped
Adrien on this. cc'ing him and Adrien in now.
@Damoder: can you confirm that we need to adjust the common.loader property
in catalina.properties.in for CLOUDSTACK-6892?
This way we should be done according to Adrien. This should be done for
4.3, 4.4 and master!
regards,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 18, 2014, at 10:06 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
it is not implemented/solved. not in 4.4 or master. Is work on it done
already?
not clear from the ticket.
I just don't know how to modify the catalina properties in the code.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
on it
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Daan,
Can you check this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6892
it might apply to 4.4 and 4.3 and I no squat in java
--
Daan
--
Daan
--
Daan
--
Daan
--
Daan
--
Daan
--
Daan
Re: cloud spec for mysql-ha connector (was: off list)
My link to the issue is wrong*^%%(*(*@#$
it should be
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6892
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H devs,
I had an offline discussion about a classloader problem [1] and an
analog discussion with Hugo. It seems we want to create an extra rpm
that must be installed when mysql ha is required. This will be
specified in the cloud.spec file and will result in an extra package
when -Dnoredist is used. On installation this would have to
specifically be installed along with the rest if so desired.
A similar construct has to be devised for debian and windows
installations. Can the respective gurus in those fields look at that?
thanks,
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6928
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Damoder Reddy
damoder.re...@citrix.com wrote:
Ok I forgot the DEB builds.
To satisfy both, this should be included in catalina.properties.in.
But only question I have is how do we change it for each version and taking
care of upgrades as well.
Thanks Regards
Damodar/
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 3:10 PM
To: Damoder Reddy
Cc: sebgoa; Adrian Lewis
Subject: Re: off list
But only for the noredist version? and how about the deb version?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Damoder Reddy damoder.re...@citrix.com
wrote:
We can put this step as part of rpm creation in cloud.spec file.
Thanks Regards
Damodar/
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 2:59 PM
To: Damoder Reddy
Cc: sebgoa; Adrian Lewis
Subject: Re: off list
The 'just' in 'Just put a symbolic link' implies a install instruction,
does it? Or can we automate this step?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Damoder Reddy damoder.re...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi,
There are 2 solutions.
one either change the catalina.properties to include strategy in the
common.loader as suggested in another thread mail
OR
Just put a symbolic link to the jar file inside
/usr/share/tomcat6/lib as this path is already loaded by common.loader
(common.loader=${catalina.base}/lib,${catalina.base}/lib/*.jar,${catalina.home}/lib,${catalina.home}/lib/*.jar,/usr/share/java/mysql-connector-java.jar).
I think 2nd option is better instead of 1st one.
Thanks Regards
Damodar/
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 2:37 PM
To: sebgoa
Cc: Damoder Reddy; Adrian Lewis
Subject: Re: off list
had Adrians address wrong
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: off list
To: sebgoa run...@gmail.com
Cc: Damoder Reddy damoder.re...@citrix.com, Adrian Lewis
adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk
I had a quick look. it doesn't seem a coding issue but a
configuration/packaging issue. the file catalina.properties.in must be
adjusted for this. There are two in the project. One for the ui, which I
think won't need to be touched and one for the server. Damoder Reddy
helped Adrien on this. cc'ing him and Adrien in now.
@Damoder: can you confirm that we need to adjust the common.loader
property in catalina.properties.in for CLOUDSTACK-6892?
This way we should be done according to Adrien. This should be done for
4.3, 4.4 and master!
regards,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 18, 2014, at 10:06 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
it is not implemented/solved. not in 4.4 or master. Is work on it done
already?
not clear from the ticket.
I just don't know how to modify the catalina properties in the code.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Daan Hoogland
daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
on it
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Daan,
Can you check this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6892
it might apply to 4.4 and 4.3 and I no squat in java
--
Daan
--
Daan
--
Daan
--
Daan
--
Daan
--
Daan
--
Daan
--
Daan
RE: [ACS4.4] Cherry-pick
Hi Daan, This commit is based on the commit https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=b0d726a872e2859a56ee677c15079cc3a59ab894;hp=a5415d93eb791bac52c40b9ede6a433a0d7f1dca this commit (b0d726a872e2859a56ee677c15079cc3a59ab894) is in 4.4-forward and not in 4.4 which is committed by jaypal yesterday when I have fixed my bug I have to rebase jaypal commit which is in 4.4-forward and build is successfully. When you have cherry-picked my commit to 4.4, this commit(b0d726a872e2859a56ee677c15079cc3a59ab894) is not cherry-picked. This commit is required as my changes are based on top of it. Please cherry-pick b0d726a872e2859a56ee677c15079cc3a59ab894 and then apply my commit on top of it which will resolve the issue. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 5:11 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ACS4.4] Cherry-pick Am working on it. -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 5:01 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [ACS4.4] Cherry-pick [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : [INFO] -- --- [ERROR] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/ws/server/src/com/cloud/network/lb/LoadBalancingRulesManagerImpl.java:[174,7] error: LoadBalancingRulesManagerImpl is not abstract and does not override abstract method findLbByStickinessId(long) in LoadBalancingRulesService I didn't run a test build :( should I revert or do you have an implementation of the method laying around? On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: 21e452ff4f0459422f0612f2ddf7033a963b0a19 there was a little conflict, which was easily resolved but please double check! -- Daan -- Daan
Re: [ACS4.4] Cherry-pick
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: b0d726a872e2859a56ee677c15079cc3a59ab894 This again gave me a simple conflict in the interface. another method was added. It was indeed not there so I committed and pushed it. -- Daan
MySQL Client dependency not installed with RPMs
Afraid I’m not a dev of any sort but can we add the package ‘mysql’ (MySQL client package) to the cloud.spec file. If you’re installing the mysql-server package on the same host as the mgmt server it’s not a problem but for those installing from the repo and using an external db host, it doesn’t get installed. Just one little thing to help the ease of installation. Not sure about Debian/Ubuntu – anyone able to verify? Is this worthy of a Jira issue? Adrian
Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #356
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/356/changes
Re: MySQL Client dependency not installed with RPMs
Adrian, this is about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6892 isn't it? I am afraid we are communicating along paralel lines here. The last mail I sent you went to dev@ as well. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Afraid I’m not a dev of any sort but can we add the package ‘mysql’ (MySQL client package) to the cloud.spec file. If you’re installing the mysql-server package on the same host as the mgmt server it’s not a problem but for those installing from the repo and using an external db host, it doesn’t get installed. Just one little thing to help the ease of installation. Not sure about Debian/Ubuntu – anyone able to verify? Is this worthy of a Jira issue? Adrian -- Daan
RE: MySQL Client dependency not installed with RPMs
Hi Daan, No - separate issue. Just bringing it up as you mentioned making changes to the cloud.spec file in a different email. This is independent of anyone trying to implement DB HA and just anyone installing from packages and using an external DB - HA or not. Adrian -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 June 2014 13:32 To: dev Subject: Re: MySQL Client dependency not installed with RPMs Adrian, this is about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6892 isn't it? I am afraid we are communicating along paralel lines here. The last mail I sent you went to dev@ as well. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Afraid I’m not a dev of any sort but can we add the package ‘mysql’ (MySQL client package) to the cloud.spec file. If you’re installing the mysql-server package on the same host as the mgmt server it’s not a problem but for those installing from the repo and using an external db host, it doesn’t get installed. Just one little thing to help the ease of installation. Not sure about Debian/Ubuntu – anyone able to verify? Is this worthy of a Jira issue? Adrian -- Daan
Re: Reset VM and it's gone - how do I get rid of this button??
That's great, thanks guys. This should prevent future tragedies. :-) Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 18 June, 2014 12:27:48 PM Subject: Re: Reset VM and it's gone - how do I get rid of this button?? On Jun 18, 2014, at 1:17 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 18, 2014, at 1:05 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Grep said to replace this in webapps/client/scripts/instances.js and it seems to be working. Is there anything else I need to watch out for? Additionally, can we add this in 4.3.1/4.4/master? Looks like it's in 4.4 and master: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6272 I will cherry pick to 4.3 Done, looks like 'reset' becomes 'reinstall' -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 18 June, 2014 11:56:52 AM Subject: Reset VM and it's gone - how do I get rid of this button?? Hi, A colleague just wiped out a VM because he thought that buttong reboots the virtual machine... Is there any way I can butcher the UI and remove that button or at least rename it to Reinstall VM or similar? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: MySQL Client dependency not installed with RPMs
ok, i see. That's a different issue indeed though the solutions are related, obviously. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Hi Daan, No - separate issue. Just bringing it up as you mentioned making changes to the cloud.spec file in a different email. This is independent of anyone trying to implement DB HA and just anyone installing from packages and using an external DB - HA or not. Adrian -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 June 2014 13:32 To: dev Subject: Re: MySQL Client dependency not installed with RPMs Adrian, this is about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6892 isn't it? I am afraid we are communicating along paralel lines here. The last mail I sent you went to dev@ as well. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Afraid I’m not a dev of any sort but can we add the package ‘mysql’ (MySQL client package) to the cloud.spec file. If you’re installing the mysql-server package on the same host as the mgmt server it’s not a problem but for those installing from the repo and using an external db host, it doesn’t get installed. Just one little thing to help the ease of installation. Not sure about Debian/Ubuntu – anyone able to verify? Is this worthy of a Jira issue? Adrian -- Daan -- Daan
[ACS-Master] Cannot load compute offerings: NPE
Hi guys, I'm facing a problem when loading service offerings on ACS Master branch. Is anyone aware of this? Is there any issue open? 2014-06-18 15:54:52,495 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (19418424@qtp-9894122-6:ctx-3a0f1094) ===START=== 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1 -- GET command=listServ iceOfferingsresponse=jsonsessionkey=pzJwAgN95saj%2FfExWkezaytg7U4%3DlistAll=truepage=1pagesize=20issystem=false_=1403099692481 2014-06-18 15:54:52,608 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker] (19418424@qtp-9894122-6:ctx-3a0f1094 ctx-226b1105) Received unknown par ameters for command listServiceOfferings. Unknown parameters : listall 2014-06-18 15:54:52,710 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (19418424@qtp-9894122-6:ctx-3a0f1094 ctx-226b1105) unhandled exception executing api command : [Ljava.lang.String;@fd06cb java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.api.query.dao.ServiceOfferingJoinDaoImpl.newServiceOfferingResponse(ServiceOfferingJoinDaoImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150) at com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionContextInterceptor.invoke(TransactionContextInterceptor.java:34) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:161) at org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172) at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204) at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy270.newServiceOfferingResponse(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.api.ApiDBUtils.newServiceOfferingResponse(ApiDBUtils.java:1794) at com.cloud.api.query.ViewResponseHelper.createServiceOfferingResponse(ViewResponseHelper.java:354) at com.cloud.api.query.QueryManagerImpl.searchForServiceOfferings(QueryManagerImpl.java:2415) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.offering.ListServiceOfferingsCmd.execute(ListServiceOfferingsCmd.java:106) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:141) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:689) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:512) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequestInContext(ApiServlet.java:317) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet$1.run(ApiServlet.java:118) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequest(ApiServlet.java:115) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doGet(ApiServlet.java:77) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:707) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:511) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:401) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:182) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:766) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:450) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:230) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:114) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:152) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:326) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:542) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:928) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:549) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:212) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:404) at
RE: Managing individual ESXi instances
IIRC, the reason is because the vCenter API is more powerful than the ESX API. At the time (before Apache), the features that requested needed vCenter. There's currently no proposal to use plain ESXi. Would love to see one though. --Alex -Original Message- From: Ivan Efremov [mailto:e...@yandex.ru] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Managing individual ESXi instances Hi all, I've sent this mail to the users list but this one looks as the better destination. I'm new to the CloudStack platform and I'm wondering why the platform does need the vCenter API and can not use ESXi directly, Can anyone elaborate on this? Are there any proposals for adding ESXi integration to CloudStack? Thanks, Ivan
Re: Review Request 22692: Test Suite for Testing Remote Access VPN on VPC
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/#review46072 --- test/integration/component/test_remotevpn_vpc.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/#comment81224 Check get_zone change requires one more argument, please check the bvt cases for example test/integration/component/test_remotevpn_vpc.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/#comment81225 Do we want to clean the existing service offering if not created by us? test/integration/component/test_remotevpn_vpc.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/#comment81226 Check is not None test/integration/component/test_remotevpn_vpc.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/#comment81227 Message sleep for sleep test/integration/component/test_remotevpn_vpc.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/#comment81228 Do we wanted to check the template stauts? test/integration/component/test_remotevpn_vpc.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/#comment81229 As well add tags related to required_hardware=true or required_hardware=false. This signifies whether these are simulator based or not. Check bvt cases for example - Santhosh Edukulla On June 17, 2014, 7:24 p.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/ --- (Updated June 17, 2014, 7:24 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar, Raja Pullela, sangeetha hariharan, sanjeev n, Santhosh Edukulla, sudha ponnaganti, SrikanteswaraRao Talluri, and Sheng Yang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Test Suite for Testing Remote Access VPN on VPC. I successfully automated the following components: 1.VPN Client Installation on Linux 2.Component that efficiently verifies Remote VPN Access between client and the Server. 3.Developed a component that automates VPN Client Configuration and services. 4.Test Cases of the Feature 5.Tested the Code multiple times on XenServer and fixed the bugs. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_remotevpn_vpc.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/config/test_data.py d870c98 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/diff/ Testing --- Test case no : Enable VPN for Public IP Address on the VPC ... === TestName: test_01_RemoteAccessVPN_VPC_EnableVPNAndConnecttoVM | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test case no : Remote a VPN User ... === TestName: test_02_VPC_RemoveVPNUser | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test case no : Add a Different VPN User and Test Access with already existing VPN User ... === TestName: test_03_VPC_AddDifferentVPNUser | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test case no : Add a Previously Removed VPN User from the VPC and Test the VPN Connectivity ... === TestName: test_04_VPC_AddPreviouslyRemovedVPNUserTestConnectivity | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test case no : Disable the VPN Service on the VPC ... === TestName: test_05_VPC_DisableVPNServiceOnVPC | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test case no : Enabled Previously Dsiabled VPN Access to VPC. ... === TestName: test_06_VPC_EnablePreviouslyDisabledVPNAccesstoVPC | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test case no : Create Nine VPN Users to test the remote.vpn.user.limit=8 Configuration parameter ... === TestName: test_07_ConfigParam_TestRemoteVPNUserLimit | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 7 tests in 1771.352s OK Thanks, Chandan Purushothama
Re: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me
Yeah, storagePoolHasEnoughIops returns true in the traditional case (i.e. non-managed storage) so we won't skip a storage pool when IOPS are not really being taken into consideration. Feel free to make enhancements and I can review your patch. Thanks! On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Yoshikazu Nojima m...@ynojima.net wrote: Prachi, Mike, I appreciate your comments. I think it is a bug that there is a difference between filter logic of ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator and that of ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator (ex. allocator skip iSCSI type storage pool or not when a volume is a RootDisk), I will unify by implementing it in AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter method. It is new information for me that managed storages only support zone level. Thank you for let me know. But when iopscapacity parameter is not set to a primary storage (i.e. unmanaged storage), storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops always returns true. I suppose calling storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops from AbstractStoragePoolAllocator will not cause a problem, and it will simplify the code. I created a patch to explain my thought. Could you review it? https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/ Regards, Noji 2014-06-17 19:19 GMT-06:00 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com: I can comment on the IOPS part. The IOPS are currently only relevant when using managed storage (which is currently only applicable at the zone level). That being the case, no cluster (or local) storage takes advantage of counting IOPS that have been handed out. Of course this logic might be expanded in the future, but that's how it works today. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote: Why ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator implements filter method (and doesn't call that of base class) rather than just using that of base class? ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter method seems doesn't care avoid parameter, doesn't skip iSCSI type storage pool even if a volume is a RootDisk. The first question seems like a bug to me. I am not sure about the IOPS Prachi -Original Message- From: ynoj...@ynojima.net [mailto:ynoj...@ynojima.net] On Behalf Of Yoshikazu Nojima Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 1:07 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me Hi, ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me. ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator and ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator are allocator classes to select storage pool. They extends AbstractStoragePoolAllocator class, which provides filter method to exclude unavailable storage pools. Why ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator implements filter method (and doesn't call that of base class) rather than just using that of base class? ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter method seems doesn't care avoid parameter, doesn't skip iSCSI type storage pool even if a volume is a RootDisk. (These functions are implemented in AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter method, which used by ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator.) On the other hand, AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter doesn't call storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops, so a cluster wide primary storage would be allocated more volumes than its designated IOPS capacity. Is there any difference between a zone wide primary storage and a cluster wide primary storage except its scope? If it is a bug, I'll fix it. Regards, Noji -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me
Sorry...I didn't see until later in my e-mail that you had submitted code. It looks good to me. Is this something you'd like checked in right away or are you planning to add to this patch? Thanks! On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Yeah, storagePoolHasEnoughIops returns true in the traditional case (i.e. non-managed storage) so we won't skip a storage pool when IOPS are not really being taken into consideration. Feel free to make enhancements and I can review your patch. Thanks! On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Yoshikazu Nojima m...@ynojima.net wrote: Prachi, Mike, I appreciate your comments. I think it is a bug that there is a difference between filter logic of ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator and that of ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator (ex. allocator skip iSCSI type storage pool or not when a volume is a RootDisk), I will unify by implementing it in AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter method. It is new information for me that managed storages only support zone level. Thank you for let me know. But when iopscapacity parameter is not set to a primary storage (i.e. unmanaged storage), storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops always returns true. I suppose calling storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops from AbstractStoragePoolAllocator will not cause a problem, and it will simplify the code. I created a patch to explain my thought. Could you review it? https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/ Regards, Noji 2014-06-17 19:19 GMT-06:00 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com: I can comment on the IOPS part. The IOPS are currently only relevant when using managed storage (which is currently only applicable at the zone level). That being the case, no cluster (or local) storage takes advantage of counting IOPS that have been handed out. Of course this logic might be expanded in the future, but that's how it works today. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote: Why ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator implements filter method (and doesn't call that of base class) rather than just using that of base class? ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter method seems doesn't care avoid parameter, doesn't skip iSCSI type storage pool even if a volume is a RootDisk. The first question seems like a bug to me. I am not sure about the IOPS Prachi -Original Message- From: ynoj...@ynojima.net [mailto:ynoj...@ynojima.net] On Behalf Of Yoshikazu Nojima Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 1:07 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me Hi, ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me. ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator and ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator are allocator classes to select storage pool. They extends AbstractStoragePoolAllocator class, which provides filter method to exclude unavailable storage pools. Why ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator implements filter method (and doesn't call that of base class) rather than just using that of base class? ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter method seems doesn't care avoid parameter, doesn't skip iSCSI type storage pool even if a volume is a RootDisk. (These functions are implemented in AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter method, which used by ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator.) On the other hand, AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter doesn't call storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops, so a cluster wide primary storage would be allocated more volumes than its designated IOPS capacity. Is there any difference between a zone wide primary storage and a cluster wide primary storage except its scope? If it is a bug, I'll fix it. Regards, Noji -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/#review46074 --- test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/#comment81240 Move this to test data under marvin/config directory, if possible. test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/#comment81235 Just check the way, we have changed get_zone in bvt, additional argument? test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/#comment81236 Lot of entities got created, is clean up happening for all of them? I mean can we double check post running the script from ms server that nothing was left out, either offerings, vms, accounts etc. test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/#comment81234 Please add test steps as doc strings, that way we can generate test steps for each test case. We can easily copy paste from your tes tplan as well? test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/#comment81232 Is it possible to define all exception entities in CloudStackException and check for them? Otherwise maintenance will be a bit difficult if we just search for message? As well, convert to lower() and search. test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/#comment81233 Better thing is to localize all these check in to a function and pass exception object and message to verify, define all your exception messages in class and verify by passing them. EX: class ExampleExceptionsToVerify: ABC=verify abc BCD=verify bcd verifyMsginException(e,ExampleExceptionsToVerify.ABC). This way, all messages can be handled in one single function and maintenance will be easy? test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/#comment81231 Is it as well a fail scenario if expected exception message is not in the response? Question: Is receiving an exception message is important or its content as well? test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/#comment81230 Move this inside try block. As well, use self.fail instead of this,it looks neat to read. - Santhosh Edukulla On June 18, 2014, 1:28 a.m., sangeetha hariharan wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 1:28 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular users. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/diff/ Testing --- test_01_createNetwork_admin (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_01_createNetwork_admin | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_02_createNetwork_admin_foruserinsamedomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_02_createNetwork_admin_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_03_createNetwork_admin_foruserinotherdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_03_createNetwork_admin_foruserinotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_04_createNetwork_domaindmin (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_04_createNetwork_domaindmin | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_05_createNetwork_domaindmin_foruserinsamedomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_05_createNetwork_domaindmin_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_06_createNetwork_domaindmin_foruserinsubdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_06_createNetwork_domaindmin_foruserinsubdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_07_createNetwork_domaindmin_forcrossdomainuser (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_07_createNetwork_domaindmin_forcrossdomainuser | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_08_createNetwork_user (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_08_createNetwork_user | Status :
Re: [ACS-Master] Cannot load compute offerings: NPE
I noticed a similar issue yesterday when trying to retrieve a list of storage volumes. I was planning on building everything up from scratch again (including the DB) to repro the issue to see if it's gone now, but it looks like it might be a more wide-spread problem than what I was just seeing. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi guys, I'm facing a problem when loading service offerings on ACS Master branch. Is anyone aware of this? Is there any issue open? 2014-06-18 15:54:52,495 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (19418424@qtp-9894122-6:ctx-3a0f1094) ===START=== 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1 -- GET command=listServ iceOfferingsresponse=jsonsessionkey=pzJwAgN95saj%2FfExWkezaytg7U4%3DlistAll=truepage=1pagesize=20issystem=false_=1403099692481 2014-06-18 15:54:52,608 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker] (19418424@qtp-9894122-6:ctx-3a0f1094 ctx-226b1105) Received unknown par ameters for command listServiceOfferings. Unknown parameters : listall 2014-06-18 15:54:52,710 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (19418424@qtp-9894122-6:ctx-3a0f1094 ctx-226b1105) unhandled exception executing api command : [Ljava.lang.String;@fd06cb java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.api.query.dao.ServiceOfferingJoinDaoImpl.newServiceOfferingResponse(ServiceOfferingJoinDaoImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150) at com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionContextInterceptor.invoke(TransactionContextInterceptor.java:34) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:161) at org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172) at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204) at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy270.newServiceOfferingResponse(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.api.ApiDBUtils.newServiceOfferingResponse(ApiDBUtils.java:1794) at com.cloud.api.query.ViewResponseHelper.createServiceOfferingResponse(ViewResponseHelper.java:354) at com.cloud.api.query.QueryManagerImpl.searchForServiceOfferings(QueryManagerImpl.java:2415) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.offering.ListServiceOfferingsCmd.execute(ListServiceOfferingsCmd.java:106) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:141) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:689) at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:512) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequestInContext(ApiServlet.java:317) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet$1.run(ApiServlet.java:118) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequest(ApiServlet.java:115) at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doGet(ApiServlet.java:77) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:707) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:511) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:401) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:182) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:766) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:450) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:230) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:114) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:152) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:326) at
Re: Managing individual ESXi instances
I know, for example, that I'd like to test out that managed storage works with it. I've added support for managed storage to XenServer, ESX/vCenter, and KVM for CloudStack. Another hypervisor type - to me personally - means I'd to verify managed storage works with it. Depending on how radical the changes for an ESX-only solution are, it may or may not work out of the box for managed storage. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Ivan Efremov e...@yandex.ru wrote: Hi Alex, How do you think, what is the rough estimation of adding ESX API support to CloudStack? AFAIU the main point of integration of the new API is plugins/hypervisors. Are there any other major points that should be patched when adding a new hypervisor type? Thanks, Ivan 18.06.2014, 18:24, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com: IIRC, the reason is because the vCenter API is more powerful than the ESX API. At the time (before Apache), the features that requested needed vCenter. There's currently no proposal to use plain ESXi. Would love to see one though. --Alex -Original Message- From: Ivan Efremov [mailto:e...@yandex.ru] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Managing individual ESXi instances Hi all, I've sent this mail to the users list but this one looks as the better destination. I'm new to the CloudStack platform and I'm wondering why the platform does need the vCenter API and can not use ESXi directly, Can anyone elaborate on this? Are there any proposals for adding ESXi integration to CloudStack? Thanks, Ivan -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: Managing individual ESXi instances
Or I'd like to know if it doesn't work (as is the case for Hyper-V until I get time to add that kind of support for it). On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I know, for example, that I'd like to test out that managed storage works with it. I've added support for managed storage to XenServer, ESX/vCenter, and KVM for CloudStack. Another hypervisor type - to me personally - means I'd to verify managed storage works with it. Depending on how radical the changes for an ESX-only solution are, it may or may not work out of the box for managed storage. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Ivan Efremov e...@yandex.ru wrote: Hi Alex, How do you think, what is the rough estimation of adding ESX API support to CloudStack? AFAIU the main point of integration of the new API is plugins/hypervisors. Are there any other major points that should be patched when adding a new hypervisor type? Thanks, Ivan 18.06.2014, 18:24, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com: IIRC, the reason is because the vCenter API is more powerful than the ESX API. At the time (before Apache), the features that requested needed vCenter. There's currently no proposal to use plain ESXi. Would love to see one though. --Alex -Original Message- From: Ivan Efremov [mailto:e...@yandex.ru] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Managing individual ESXi instances Hi all, I've sent this mail to the users list but this one looks as the better destination. I'm new to the CloudStack platform and I'm wondering why the platform does need the vCenter API and can not use ESXi directly, Can anyone elaborate on this? Are there any proposals for adding ESXi integration to CloudStack? Thanks, Ivan -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: Managing individual ESXi instances
Hi Alex, How do you think, what is the rough estimation of adding ESX API support to CloudStack? AFAIU the main point of integration of the new API is plugins/hypervisors. Are there any other major points that should be patched when adding a new hypervisor type? Thanks, Ivan 18.06.2014, 18:24, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com: IIRC, the reason is because the vCenter API is more powerful than the ESX API. At the time (before Apache), the features that requested needed vCenter. There's currently no proposal to use plain ESXi. Would love to see one though. --Alex -Original Message- From: Ivan Efremov [mailto:e...@yandex.ru] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Managing individual ESXi instances Hi all, I've sent this mail to the users list but this one looks as the better destination. I'm new to the CloudStack platform and I'm wondering why the platform does need the vCenter API and can not use ESXi directly, Can anyone elaborate on this? Are there any proposals for adding ESXi integration to CloudStack? Thanks, Ivan
Re: Managing individual ESXi instances
Mike, I wouldn't expect things with the VMware Hypervisor (what they refer to standalone ESXi) to work out of the box. Since you can't cluster things, I'd expect only raw iSCSI to work, but it's been years since I've worked with raw ESXi. -tim On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Or I'd like to know if it doesn't work (as is the case for Hyper-V until I get time to add that kind of support for it). On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I know, for example, that I'd like to test out that managed storage works with it. I've added support for managed storage to XenServer, ESX/vCenter, and KVM for CloudStack. Another hypervisor type - to me personally - means I'd to verify managed storage works with it. Depending on how radical the changes for an ESX-only solution are, it may or may not work out of the box for managed storage. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Ivan Efremov e...@yandex.ru wrote: Hi Alex, How do you think, what is the rough estimation of adding ESX API support to CloudStack? AFAIU the main point of integration of the new API is plugins/hypervisors. Are there any other major points that should be patched when adding a new hypervisor type? Thanks, Ivan 18.06.2014, 18:24, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com: IIRC, the reason is because the vCenter API is more powerful than the ESX API. At the time (before Apache), the features that requested needed vCenter. There's currently no proposal to use plain ESXi. Would love to see one though. --Alex -Original Message- From: Ivan Efremov [mailto:e...@yandex.ru] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Managing individual ESXi instances Hi all, I've sent this mail to the users list but this one looks as the better destination. I'm new to the CloudStack platform and I'm wondering why the platform does need the vCenter API and can not use ESXi directly, Can anyone elaborate on this? Are there any proposals for adding ESXi integration to CloudStack? Thanks, Ivan -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: Managing individual ESXi instances
Well, as long as the API to standalone ESX is similar to vCenter's API (which much of it is, I think), it might not be a ton of work to get the managed storage part to work, but it's hard to say. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: Mike, I wouldn't expect things with the VMware Hypervisor (what they refer to standalone ESXi) to work out of the box. Since you can't cluster things, I'd expect only raw iSCSI to work, but it's been years since I've worked with raw ESXi. -tim On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Or I'd like to know if it doesn't work (as is the case for Hyper-V until I get time to add that kind of support for it). On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I know, for example, that I'd like to test out that managed storage works with it. I've added support for managed storage to XenServer, ESX/vCenter, and KVM for CloudStack. Another hypervisor type - to me personally - means I'd to verify managed storage works with it. Depending on how radical the changes for an ESX-only solution are, it may or may not work out of the box for managed storage. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Ivan Efremov e...@yandex.ru wrote: Hi Alex, How do you think, what is the rough estimation of adding ESX API support to CloudStack? AFAIU the main point of integration of the new API is plugins/hypervisors. Are there any other major points that should be patched when adding a new hypervisor type? Thanks, Ivan 18.06.2014, 18:24, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com: IIRC, the reason is because the vCenter API is more powerful than the ESX API. At the time (before Apache), the features that requested needed vCenter. There's currently no proposal to use plain ESXi. Would love to see one though. --Alex -Original Message- From: Ivan Efremov [mailto:e...@yandex.ru] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Managing individual ESXi instances Hi all, I've sent this mail to the users list but this one looks as the better destination. I'm new to the CloudStack platform and I'm wondering why the platform does need the vCenter API and can not use ESXi directly, Can anyone elaborate on this? Are there any proposals for adding ESXi integration to CloudStack? Thanks, Ivan -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me
Mike, Thank you for your review. This is a patch I would like to push. I don't have anything to add regarding this issue. I will push this patch in the next few hours. Regards, Noji 2014-06-18 9:15 GMT-06:00 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com: Sorry...I didn't see until later in my e-mail that you had submitted code. It looks good to me. Is this something you'd like checked in right away or are you planning to add to this patch? Thanks! On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Yeah, storagePoolHasEnoughIops returns true in the traditional case (i.e. non-managed storage) so we won't skip a storage pool when IOPS are not really being taken into consideration. Feel free to make enhancements and I can review your patch. Thanks! On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Yoshikazu Nojima m...@ynojima.net wrote: Prachi, Mike, I appreciate your comments. I think it is a bug that there is a difference between filter logic of ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator and that of ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator (ex. allocator skip iSCSI type storage pool or not when a volume is a RootDisk), I will unify by implementing it in AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter method. It is new information for me that managed storages only support zone level. Thank you for let me know. But when iopscapacity parameter is not set to a primary storage (i.e. unmanaged storage), storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops always returns true. I suppose calling storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops from AbstractStoragePoolAllocator will not cause a problem, and it will simplify the code. I created a patch to explain my thought. Could you review it? https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/ Regards, Noji 2014-06-17 19:19 GMT-06:00 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com: I can comment on the IOPS part. The IOPS are currently only relevant when using managed storage (which is currently only applicable at the zone level). That being the case, no cluster (or local) storage takes advantage of counting IOPS that have been handed out. Of course this logic might be expanded in the future, but that's how it works today. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote: Why ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator implements filter method (and doesn't call that of base class) rather than just using that of base class? ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter method seems doesn't care avoid parameter, doesn't skip iSCSI type storage pool even if a volume is a RootDisk. The first question seems like a bug to me. I am not sure about the IOPS Prachi -Original Message- From: ynoj...@ynojima.net [mailto:ynoj...@ynojima.net] On Behalf Of Yoshikazu Nojima Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 1:07 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me Hi, ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me. ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator and ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator are allocator classes to select storage pool. They extends AbstractStoragePoolAllocator class, which provides filter method to exclude unavailable storage pools. Why ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator implements filter method (and doesn't call that of base class) rather than just using that of base class? ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter method seems doesn't care avoid parameter, doesn't skip iSCSI type storage pool even if a volume is a RootDisk. (These functions are implemented in AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter method, which used by ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator.) On the other hand, AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter doesn't call storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops, so a cluster wide primary storage would be allocated more volumes than its designated IOPS capacity. Is there any difference between a zone wide primary storage and a cluster wide primary storage except its scope? If it is a bug, I'll fix it. Regards, Noji -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me
Sounds good - thanks! On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Yoshikazu Nojima m...@ynojima.net wrote: Mike, Thank you for your review. This is a patch I would like to push. I don't have anything to add regarding this issue. I will push this patch in the next few hours. Regards, Noji 2014-06-18 9:15 GMT-06:00 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com: Sorry...I didn't see until later in my e-mail that you had submitted code. It looks good to me. Is this something you'd like checked in right away or are you planning to add to this patch? Thanks! On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Yeah, storagePoolHasEnoughIops returns true in the traditional case (i.e. non-managed storage) so we won't skip a storage pool when IOPS are not really being taken into consideration. Feel free to make enhancements and I can review your patch. Thanks! On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Yoshikazu Nojima m...@ynojima.net wrote: Prachi, Mike, I appreciate your comments. I think it is a bug that there is a difference between filter logic of ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator and that of ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator (ex. allocator skip iSCSI type storage pool or not when a volume is a RootDisk), I will unify by implementing it in AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter method. It is new information for me that managed storages only support zone level. Thank you for let me know. But when iopscapacity parameter is not set to a primary storage (i.e. unmanaged storage), storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops always returns true. I suppose calling storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops from AbstractStoragePoolAllocator will not cause a problem, and it will simplify the code. I created a patch to explain my thought. Could you review it? https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/ Regards, Noji 2014-06-17 19:19 GMT-06:00 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com: I can comment on the IOPS part. The IOPS are currently only relevant when using managed storage (which is currently only applicable at the zone level). That being the case, no cluster (or local) storage takes advantage of counting IOPS that have been handed out. Of course this logic might be expanded in the future, but that's how it works today. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote: Why ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator implements filter method (and doesn't call that of base class) rather than just using that of base class? ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter method seems doesn't care avoid parameter, doesn't skip iSCSI type storage pool even if a volume is a RootDisk. The first question seems like a bug to me. I am not sure about the IOPS Prachi -Original Message- From: ynoj...@ynojima.net [mailto:ynoj...@ynojima.net] On Behalf Of Yoshikazu Nojima Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 1:07 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me Hi, ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me. ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator and ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator are allocator classes to select storage pool. They extends AbstractStoragePoolAllocator class, which provides filter method to exclude unavailable storage pools. Why ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator implements filter method (and doesn't call that of base class) rather than just using that of base class? ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter method seems doesn't care avoid parameter, doesn't skip iSCSI type storage pool even if a volume is a RootDisk. (These functions are implemented in AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter method, which used by ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator.) On the other hand, AbstractStoragePoolAllocator#filter doesn't call storageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops, so a cluster wide primary storage would be allocated more volumes than its designated IOPS capacity. Is there any difference between a zone wide primary storage and a cluster wide primary storage except its scope? If it is a bug, I'll fix it. Regards, Noji -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #984
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/984/changes Changes: [mail] CLOUDSTACK-6935 refactor StoragePoolAllocator#filter logic -- [...truncated 1540 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-usage --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 8 resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-usage --- [INFO] Compiling 4 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/usage/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-usage --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/usage/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Running com.cloud.usage.UsageSanityCheckerTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.554 sec Results : Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Orchestration Component 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Compiling 68 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Compiling 5 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Tests are skipped. [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Services 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloudstack-services --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/services/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/services (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloudstack-services --- [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloudstack-service-secondary-storage --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/services/secondary-storage/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/services/secondary-storage (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloudstack-service-secondary-storage --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @
RE: Managing individual ESXi instances
Hi Ivan, To introduce a new hypervisor, it's a matter of - Adding a new Discoverer implementation to tell CloudStack which Resource best works with the new Hypervisor. - Adding a new Resource implementation that deals with all of the hypervisor commands sent to it. This is the big part due to the large set of commands we send to it. For someone who understands CloudStack code and the hypervisor well, I think a prototype can be done in about two months or so. For ESX, you have to figure out a how to map functions that CS supports but is not with ESX. For example, I think migration and live storage migration. You can decide not to support them in the prototype and just support simple vm/volume/network life cycle for now. --Alex -Original Message- From: Ivan Efremov [mailto:e...@yandex.ru] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 8:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Managing individual ESXi instances Hi Alex, How do you think, what is the rough estimation of adding ESX API support to CloudStack? AFAIU the main point of integration of the new API is plugins/hypervisors. Are there any other major points that should be patched when adding a new hypervisor type? Thanks, Ivan 18.06.2014, 18:24, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com: IIRC, the reason is because the vCenter API is more powerful than the ESX API. At the time (before Apache), the features that requested needed vCenter. There's currently no proposal to use plain ESXi. Would love to see one though. --Alex -Original Message- From: Ivan Efremov [mailto:e...@yandex.ru] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Managing individual ESXi instances Hi all, I've sent this mail to the users list but this one looks as the better destination. I'm new to the CloudStack platform and I'm wondering why the platform does need the vCenter API and can not use ESXi directly, Can anyone elaborate on this? Are there any proposals for adding ESXi integration to CloudStack? Thanks, Ivan
[ACS 4.4] cherry-pick request for CLOUDSTACK-6935
Daan, Could you cherry-pick the commit cd414a0f56798ae801fc464be127e37daabef809 into 4.4? This is a fix to the bug CLOUDSTACK-6935. Bug description: Some storage pool filtering logic like hypervisor type check, storage type check for root volume and avoid list check is not enabled in ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator. Regards, Noji
Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-forward-build #261
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-forward-build/261/changes Changes: [mail] CLOUDSTACK-6935 refactor StoragePoolAllocator#filter logic -- [...truncated 1493 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ xapi --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-forward-build/ws/deps/XenServerJava/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ xapi --- [INFO] Compiling 51 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-forward-build/ws/deps/XenServerJava/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ xapi --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-forward-build/ws/deps/XenServerJava/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ xapi --- [INFO] No sources to compile [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ xapi --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-forward-build/ws/deps/XenServerJava/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Results : Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Orchestration Component 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-forward-build/ws/engine/orchestration (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Compiling 68 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-forward-build/ws/engine/orchestration/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-forward-build/ws/engine/orchestration/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Compiling 5 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-forward-build/ws/engine/orchestration/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Tests are skipped. [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Services 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloudstack-services --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-forward-build/ws/services (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloudstack-services --- [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloudstack-service-secondary-storage --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-forward-build/ws/services/secondary-storage (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] ---
Re: [POLL] Who uses awsapi with CloudStack in production?
Hi Rohit, The awsapi was one of the reasons we chose to use ACS. We have developed some internal tools and apps to manage our deployments on AWS that we want to re-use on ACS. We have not been able to use it yet because it was broken in 4.1.1. We tried to upgrade to 4.2 and were unsuccessful and are now waiting for 4.4 to finally upgrade and hopefully be able to use the awsapi. We use ACS internally for development and testing of our applications that we push to AWS. thanks, Carlos On Jun 18, 2014, at 12:11 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Who uses awsapi or any other EC2 compatible interface such as ec2stack with CloudStack (or CloudStack distros such as Citrix CloudPlatform) in production? And, if marketing and publicity are/were big motivation(s)? In case you don't want to discuss on this thread, please take this anonymous poll: http://www.polljunkie.com/poll/fbyfdc/who-uses-awsapi-with-cloudstack-in-prouduction # Some stats I've been watching Collab14 videos and found references where many speakers reference overall CloudStack codebase to be about 1.5M (million) lines of Java code which is not exactly true. Let me share some findings; - As of today, CloudStack master is about 1.7M lines of Java code [1] - CloudStack awsapi artifact is 1.04M lines of Java code [2] - Code excluding awsapi, tests and license/comment is about 590k lines of Java code [3] - The core excluding plugins, api and the above is about 300k lines of Java code [4] Why should I care: - some useful/fun stats to keep in mind - it's not a giant mammoth that cannot be fixed or developed upon - encouraging for new developers that if they try they can understand and fix it FYI, this started on twitter yesterday: https://twitter.com/_bhaisaab/status/479007075414974465 [1] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [2] cd cloudstack-repo find awsapi | grep java$ | xargs cat | wc -l [3] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [tT]est | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l [4] cd cloudstack-repo find . | grep -v awsapi | grep -v [Tt]est | grep -v plugins | grep -v api | grep java$ | xargs cat | grep -v '^//' | wc -l Regards.
Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #985
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/985/changes Changes: [brian.federle] List view: Pass ID to action pre-filters -- [...truncated 1540 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-usage --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 8 resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-usage --- [INFO] Compiling 4 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/usage/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-usage --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/usage/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Running com.cloud.usage.UsageSanityCheckerTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.545 sec Results : Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Orchestration Component 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Compiling 68 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Compiling 5 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Tests are skipped. [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Services 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloudstack-services --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/services/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/services (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloudstack-services --- [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloudstack-service-secondary-storage --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/services/secondary-storage/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/services/secondary-storage (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloudstack-service-secondary-storage --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #985
please revert and resubmit in 4.4-forward don't care about how you fix master(I didn't write that) On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Yoshikazu Nojima m...@ynojima.net wrote: Sorry for this mess. I'll fix. 2014-06-18 12:58 GMT-06:00 jenk...@cloudstack.org: See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/985/changes Changes: [brian.federle] List view: Pass ID to action pre-filters -- [...truncated 1540 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-usage --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 8 resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-usage --- [INFO] Compiling 4 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/usage/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-usage --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/usage/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Running com.cloud.usage.UsageSanityCheckerTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.545 sec Results : Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Orchestration Component 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Compiling 68 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Compiling 5 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Tests are skipped. [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Services 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloudstack-services --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/services/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/services (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloudstack-services --- [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloudstack-service-secondary-storage --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/services/secondary-storage/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/services/secondary-storage (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @
Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #986
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/986/changes
failed build on 4.3
Anyone seeing a build error like this: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) on project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact: Could not transfer artifact net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:pom:1.0-SNAPSHOT from/to apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots): Failed to transfer file: http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contrail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom. Return code is: 503, ReasonPhrase:Service Temporarily Unavailable. for project net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT - [Help 1] [ERROR]
Re: failed build on 4.3
Look at what the error actually says. It's getting a 503 from repository.a.o --David On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:21 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone seeing a build error like this: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) on project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact: Could not transfer artifact net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:pom:1.0-SNAPSHOT from/to apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots): Failed to transfer file: http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contrail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom. Return code is: 503, ReasonPhrase:Service Temporarily Unavailable. for project net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT - [Help 1] [ERROR]
Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.4-forward-build #264
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-forward-build/264/changes
Re: failed build on 4.3
I faced it for 4.4 on Monday. There was a thread running yesterday on this too. Apparently an intermittent issue. Thanks, Amogh On 6/18/14 12:45 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Look at what the error actually says. It's getting a 503 from repository.a.o --David On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:21 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone seeing a build error like this: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) on project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact: Could not transfer artifact net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:pom:1.0-SNAPSHOT from/to apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots): Failed to transfer file: http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contr ail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom. Return code is: 503, ReasonPhrase:Service Temporarily Unavailable. for project net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT - [Help 1] [ERROR]
Re: [ACS 4.4] cherry-pick request for CLOUDSTACK-6935
Daan, Could you cherry-pick 45f0c7367680f4bfbcee470139b708d69322be78 instead of cd414a0f56798ae801fc464be127e37daabef809? Regards, Noji 2014-06-18 11:59 GMT-06:00 Yoshikazu Nojima m...@ynojima.net: Daan, Could you cherry-pick the commit cd414a0f56798ae801fc464be127e37daabef809 into 4.4? This is a fix to the bug CLOUDSTACK-6935. Bug description: Some storage pool filtering logic like hypervisor type check, storage type check for root volume and avoid list check is not enabled in ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator. Regards, Noji
Re: Can we delete a template after a VM is instantiated from it?
This seems a bug to me, start vm should not rely on the template not deleted. Please file a bug for that. Thanks -min On 6/16/14 10:33 AM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: This way, it seems that you have a bug in CS 4.3.0 when starting a machine that was created from a template that has been deleted. There will happen a null pointer exception in: ³858 -if (volTemplateId != null volTemplateId.longValue() != template.getId())² The object, ³template² is going to be null, because in: ³811 - VirtualMachineTemplate template = _entityMgr.findById(VirtualMachineTemplate.class, vm.getTemplateId());² The findById, will add a where clause, looking for template that have the column removed that is null, therefore It will return a null object. On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, You can remove it from the UI, but not directly from the disk as it is used (in many cases) as a backing file for the VMs spawned from it. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 16 June, 2014 5:18:04 AM Subject: RE: Can we delete a template after a VM is instantiated from it? We can delete template without any issues. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2014 8:48 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Can we delete a template after a VM is instantiated from it? Hi, I was wondering if we can delete a template that has already been used to instantiate some VMs. Would that cause any trouble? -- Rafael Weingärtner -- Rafael Weingärtner
Re: Can we delete a template after a VM is instantiated from it?
Sure, I can do that. I also think that it is a bug. sorry if it seems a dumb question, but, how can I file a bug report? On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote: This seems a bug to me, start vm should not rely on the template not deleted. Please file a bug for that. Thanks -min On 6/16/14 10:33 AM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: This way, it seems that you have a bug in CS 4.3.0 when starting a machine that was created from a template that has been deleted. There will happen a null pointer exception in: ³858 -if (volTemplateId != null volTemplateId.longValue() != template.getId())² The object, ³template² is going to be null, because in: ³811 - VirtualMachineTemplate template = _entityMgr.findById(VirtualMachineTemplate.class, vm.getTemplateId());² The findById, will add a where clause, looking for template that have the column removed that is null, therefore It will return a null object. On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, You can remove it from the UI, but not directly from the disk as it is used (in many cases) as a backing file for the VMs spawned from it. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 16 June, 2014 5:18:04 AM Subject: RE: Can we delete a template after a VM is instantiated from it? We can delete template without any issues. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2014 8:48 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Can we delete a template after a VM is instantiated from it? Hi, I was wondering if we can delete a template that has already been used to instantiate some VMs. Would that cause any trouble? -- Rafael Weingärtner -- Rafael Weingärtner -- Rafael Weingärtner
Re: Can we delete a template after a VM is instantiated from it?
Google CloudStack JIRA. Create an account and you should be able to log a bug. On Wednesday, June 18, 2014, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: Sure, I can do that. I also think that it is a bug. sorry if it seems a dumb question, but, how can I file a bug report? On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com javascript:; wrote: This seems a bug to me, start vm should not rely on the template not deleted. Please file a bug for that. Thanks -min On 6/16/14 10:33 AM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: This way, it seems that you have a bug in CS 4.3.0 when starting a machine that was created from a template that has been deleted. There will happen a null pointer exception in: ³858 -if (volTemplateId != null volTemplateId.longValue() != template.getId())² The object, ³template² is going to be null, because in: ³811 - VirtualMachineTemplate template = _entityMgr.findById(VirtualMachineTemplate.class, vm.getTemplateId());² The findById, will add a where clause, looking for template that have the column removed that is null, therefore It will return a null object. On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro javascript:; wrote: Hi, You can remove it from the UI, but not directly from the disk as it is used (in many cases) as a backing file for the VMs spawned from it. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com javascript:; To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:; Sent: Monday, 16 June, 2014 5:18:04 AM Subject: RE: Can we delete a template after a VM is instantiated from it? We can delete template without any issues. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com javascript:;] Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2014 8:48 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:; Subject: Can we delete a template after a VM is instantiated from it? Hi, I was wondering if we can delete a template that has already been used to instantiate some VMs. Would that cause any trouble? -- Rafael Weingärtner -- Rafael Weingärtner -- Rafael Weingärtner -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)
On June 17, 2014, 5:06 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
One more comment regarding spring-server-core-managers-context.xml. As your
code comes as a CS plugin, all the managers of your plugin should be
defined in your plugin's *-context.xml file, not
spring-server-core-managers-context.xml. These are the classes of your
plugin:
bean id=fullSyncer
class=org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.FullSyncer /
bean id=fullScanner
class=org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.service.FullScanner /
bean id=autoGenerator
class=org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.simulator.SimulatorAutoGenerator
/
bean id=domainSubscriber
class=org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.subscriber.DomainSubscriber /
bean id=accountSubscriber
class=org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.subscriber.AccountSubscriber
/
bean id=userSubscriber
class=org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.subscriber.UserSubscriber /
bean id=injectedCollection
class=org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.InjectedCollection /
bean id=syncQueryManagerImpl
class=org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.api.response.SyncQueryManagerImpl/
bean id=apiSyncResponseHelper
class=org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.api.response.ApiSyncResponseHelper/
bean id=syncAccountJoinDaoImpl
class=org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.api.dao.SyncAccountJoinDaoImpl
/
bean id=syncUserAccountJoinDaoImpl
class=org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.api.dao.SyncUserAccountJoinDaoImpl
/
If you want to look at the example, look at any CS plugin, for example
cloud-plugin-hypervisor-vmware (refer to spring-vmware-core-context.xml
file to see how the managers are defined there)
I moved to
plugins/event-bus/multiregion/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/spring-plugin-multiregion-system-context.xml
and have this error during starting the mgmt server.
org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating bean
with name 'eventNotificationBus': Injection of autowired dependencies failed;
nested exception is org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException:
Could not autowire field: protected
org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.subscriber.DomainSubscriber
org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.MultiRegionEventBus.domainSubscriber;
nested exception is
org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No qualifying
bean of type
[org.apache.cloudstack.mom.multiregion.subscriber.DomainSubscriber] found for
dependency: expected at least 1 bean which qualifies as autowire candidate for
this dependency. Dependency annotations: {@javax.inject.Inject()}
Can you give me how to resolve this?
- Alex
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20099/#review45955
---
On June 15, 2014, 9:40 p.m., Alex Ough wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20099/
---
(Updated June 15, 2014, 9:40 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
This is the review request for the core changes related with #17790 that has
only the new plugin codes.
Diffs
-
api/src/com/cloud/event/EventTypes.java 39ef710
api/src/com/cloud/user/AccountService.java 7e37b38
api/src/com/cloud/user/DomainService.java 4c1f93d
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/ApiConstants.java fdb4558
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/BaseCmd.java f6f21ae
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/account/CreateAccountCmd.java
50d67d9
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/account/DeleteAccountCmd.java
5754ec5
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/account/DisableAccountCmd.java
3e5e1d3
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/account/EnableAccountCmd.java
f30c985
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/account/LockAccountCmd.java
3c185e4
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/account/UpdateAccountCmd.java
a7ce74a
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/domain/CreateDomainCmd.java
312c9ee
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/domain/DeleteDomainCmd.java
a6d2b0b
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/domain/UpdateDomainCmd.java
409a84d
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/region/AddRegionCmd.java
f6743ba
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/region/UpdateRegionCmd.java
b08cbbb
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/user/CreateUserCmd.java
51e218d
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/user/DeleteUserCmd.java
08ba521
Re: Review Request 22510: [Windows] Can not create Template from ROOT snapshot. Fixed the same by adding pathSeparator to the DataStoreTO.java
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22510/#review46187 --- Ship it! master - 5cbb182c6d280a2d286d6b2443b235bcf87f2f17 - Koushik Das On June 18, 2014, 9:41 a.m., Damodar Reddy Talakanti wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22510/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 9:41 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Koushik Das, and Min Chen. Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6636 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6636 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Due to File.separator on windows machine the template creation from snapshot is failing as it has mis-matched path separator which is windows path separator(\). Fixed the same by adding getPathSeparator() method to DataStoreTO.java and all it's implementations. Diffs - api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/DataStoreTO.java 8d47adc api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/NfsTO.java 1c9ee38 api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/S3TO.java f64fe35 api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/SwiftTO.java 3b76dad core/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/to/ImageStoreTO.java 93c62f6 core/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/to/PrimaryDataStoreTO.java 29e53b0 plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/XenServerStorageProcessor.java e96ebf4 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22510/diff/ Testing --- Tested on Windows 2012 R2 server and on centos. Tested the following use cases. 1. Attach ISO 2. Detach ISO 3. Snapshot creation from root disk 4. Snapshot creation from data disk 5. volume creation from (3) 6. template creation from(3) 7. Launch a VM after registering new template. Thanks, Damodar Reddy Talakanti
Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2933
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/2933/ -- Started by upstream project build-master build number 990 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-bca (cloudstack-buildslave-centos6) in workspace http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/ws/ Fetching changes from the remote Git repository Fetching upstream changes from https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git ERROR: Timeout after 400 minutes FATAL: Failed to fetch from https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:625) at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.retrieveChanges(GitSCM.java:847) at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.checkout(GitSCM.java:872) at hudson.model.AbstractProject.checkout(AbstractProject.java:1320) at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.defaultCheckout(AbstractBuild.java:609) at jenkins.scm.SCMCheckoutStrategy.checkout(SCMCheckoutStrategy.java:88) at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.run(AbstractBuild.java:518) at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1688) at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43) at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:88) at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:231) Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Command git fetch --tags --progress https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* returned status code 128: stdout: stderr: error: RPC failed; result=52, HTTP code = 100 error: fetch-pack died of signal 15 at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandIn(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1086) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandWithCredentials(CliGitAPIImpl.java:968) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.access$200(CliGitAPIImpl.java:71) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl$1.execute(CliGitAPIImpl.java:197) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:152) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:145) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:118) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48) at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:328) at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:701)
Review Request 22750: Removed load option and added required_hardware attribute to pom
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22750/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6914 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6914 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- 1. As part of refactoring, we removed load option to nose marvin plugin, now removed it from pom and added required_hardware attribute to pom 2. simulator, selfservice, tags earlier added were redundant, at many places under test cases, these are same. Removed them as part of clean up from test cases. Removed them from pom file as well Diffs - tools/marvin/pom.xml f36f5e4 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22750/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #2934
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/2934/changes
Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula
On June 18, 2014, 3:20 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py, line 481 https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/diff/1/?file=612001#file612001line481 Lot of entities got created, is clean up happening for all of them? I mean can we double check post running the script from ms server that nothing was left out, either offerings, vms, accounts etc. All the resources like accounts,Vms are all created under 2 domains except for 2 accounts created under ROOT domain which are included in the cleanup object that is sent to cleanup_resources method. In tearDownClass, I am deleting both the domains that were created with clean option set to true which I have made sure as part of test execution cleans up all resources under this domain: cls.cleanup = [ cls.account_root, cls.account_roota, cls.service_offering, ] In tearDownClass() cls.domain_1.delete(cls.apiclient,cleanup=true) cls.domain_2.delete(cls.apiclient,cleanup=true) cleanup_resources(cls.apiclient, cls.cleanup) On June 18, 2014, 3:20 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py, line 938 https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/diff/1/?file=612001#file612001line938 Is it as well a fail scenario if expected exception message is not in the response? Question: Is receiving an exception message is important or its content as well? This use case is to validate that Domain admin should not be able allowed to deploy vm for users not in his sub domain. We expect the API to error out with a specific error message relating to access check failure. So it is important that we receive an exception with a certain access check failure message. On June 18, 2014, 3:20 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py, line 939 https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/diff/1/?file=612001#file612001line939 Move this inside try block. As well, use self.fail instead of this,it looks neat to read. In this case , test case fails when exception is not raised. That is the reason why I have the raise AssertionError out side the try block. I will use self.fail instead of raising a AssertionError On June 18, 2014, 3:20 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py, line 35 https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/diff/1/?file=612001#file612001line35 Move this to test data under marvin/config directory, if possible. The test data I am using for acl related suites are very large and does not overlap with any test data used by all other suites. So my thinking is that it would not be ideal to add it to the common file - test_data.py which is common to all test suites. Is there a way for me to create a test data file specific for acl test cases and have my test suite load this specific test data? For this patch I have kept the data within the test suite itself. On June 18, 2014, 3:20 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py, line 935 https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/diff/1/?file=612001#file612001line935 Is it possible to define all exception entities in CloudStackException and check for them? Otherwise maintenance will be a bit difficult if we just search for message? As well, convert to lower() and search. I will define all the exception entities in codes.py and have a method verifyMsginException(exception,message) which will verify that the exception has the message. On June 18, 2014, 3:20 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py, line 936 https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/diff/1/?file=612001#file612001line936 Better thing is to localize all these check in to a function and pass exception object and message to verify, define all your exception messages in class and verify by passing them. EX: class ExampleExceptionsToVerify: ABC=verify abc BCD=verify bcd verifyMsginException(e,ExampleExceptionsToVerify.ABC). This way, all messages can be handled in one single function and maintenance will be easy? I will define all the exception entities in codes.py and have a method verifyMsginException(exception,message) which will verify that the exception has the message. - sangeetha --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/#review46074 --- On June 18, 2014, 1:28 a.m., sangeetha hariharan wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/
Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/ --- (Updated June 19, 2014, 5:50 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla. Changes --- - Added error string constants in code.py - Added verifyMsginException() to verify the presence of error string in exception string - Used verifyMsginException() method and error string constants from code.py for validating error strings. - Test steps added as doc strings - changed get_zone() call to include zone name parameter - used self.fail instead of raise AssertionError Repository: cloudstack-git Description (updated) --- This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular users. Added error string constants in code.py Added verifyMsginException() to verify the presence of error string in exception string Diffs - test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/diff/ Testing --- test_01_createNetwork_admin (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_01_createNetwork_admin | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_02_createNetwork_admin_foruserinsamedomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_02_createNetwork_admin_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_03_createNetwork_admin_foruserinotherdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_03_createNetwork_admin_foruserinotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_04_createNetwork_domaindmin (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_04_createNetwork_domaindmin | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_05_createNetwork_domaindmin_foruserinsamedomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_05_createNetwork_domaindmin_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_06_createNetwork_domaindmin_foruserinsubdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_06_createNetwork_domaindmin_foruserinsubdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_07_createNetwork_domaindmin_forcrossdomainuser (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_07_createNetwork_domaindmin_forcrossdomainuser | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_08_createNetwork_user (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_08_createNetwork_user | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_09_createNetwork_user_foruserinsamedomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_09_createNetwork_user_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_10_createNetwork_user_foruserinotherdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_10_createNetwork_user_foruserinotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_11_deployvm_admin (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_11_deployvm_admin | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_12_deployvm_admin_foruserinsamedomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_12_deployvm_admin_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_13_1_deployvm_admin_foruserinotherdomain_crossnetwork (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_13_1_deployvm_admin_foruserinotherdomain_crossnetwork | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_13_deployvm_admin_foruserinotherdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_13_deployvm_admin_foruserinotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_14_deployvm_domaindmin (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_14_deployvm_domaindmin | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_15_deployvm_domaindmin_foruserinsamedomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_15_deployvm_domaindmin_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_16_deployvm_domaindmin_foruserinsubdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_16_deployvm_domaindmin_foruserinsubdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_17_1_deployvm_domainadmin_foruserinotherdomain_crossnetwork (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_17_1_deployvm_domainadmin_foruserinotherdomain_crossnetwork | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_17_deployvm_domaindmin_forcrossdomainuser
Re: Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regula
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/ --- (Updated June 19, 2014, 5:52 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla. Changes --- This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular users. Added error string constants in code.py Added verifyMsginException() to verify the presence of error string in exception string Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular users. Added error string constants in code.py Added verifyMsginException() to verify the presence of error string in exception string Diffs (updated) - test/integration/component/test_acl_isolatednetwork.py PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackException.py c2eb57a tools/marvin/marvin/codes.py a1e7085 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/diff/ Testing --- test_01_createNetwork_admin (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_01_createNetwork_admin | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_02_createNetwork_admin_foruserinsamedomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_02_createNetwork_admin_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_03_createNetwork_admin_foruserinotherdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_03_createNetwork_admin_foruserinotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_04_createNetwork_domaindmin (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_04_createNetwork_domaindmin | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_05_createNetwork_domaindmin_foruserinsamedomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_05_createNetwork_domaindmin_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_06_createNetwork_domaindmin_foruserinsubdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_06_createNetwork_domaindmin_foruserinsubdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_07_createNetwork_domaindmin_forcrossdomainuser (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_07_createNetwork_domaindmin_forcrossdomainuser | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_08_createNetwork_user (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_08_createNetwork_user | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_09_createNetwork_user_foruserinsamedomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_09_createNetwork_user_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_10_createNetwork_user_foruserinotherdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_10_createNetwork_user_foruserinotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_11_deployvm_admin (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_11_deployvm_admin | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_12_deployvm_admin_foruserinsamedomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_12_deployvm_admin_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_13_1_deployvm_admin_foruserinotherdomain_crossnetwork (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_13_1_deployvm_admin_foruserinotherdomain_crossnetwork | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_13_deployvm_admin_foruserinotherdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_13_deployvm_admin_foruserinotherdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_14_deployvm_domaindmin (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_14_deployvm_domaindmin | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_15_deployvm_domaindmin_foruserinsamedomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_15_deployvm_domaindmin_foruserinsamedomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_16_deployvm_domaindmin_foruserinsubdomain (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_16_deployvm_domaindmin_foruserinsubdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok test_17_1_deployvm_domainadmin_foruserinotherdomain_crossnetwork (integration.component.test_acl_isolatednetwork.TestIsolatedNetwork) ... === TestName: test_17_1_deployvm_domainadmin_foruserinotherdomain_crossnetwork | Status : SUCCESS === ok
