Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2)
Pierre, In my case it did not, everything worked well, but do note I manually patched the sysvm tmpl for CLOUDSTACK-7781. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2014 23:43:41 Subject: Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2) Does 4.4.2 require new set of systemvm compare to 4.4.1 ? On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Tomasz Zięba t.a.zi...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-package-rpm/ -- build 317 http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-systemvm64/ -- build 171 Regards Tom 2014-11-21 3:59 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com: Hi All, I've created a 4.4.2 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4 Commit: e0420a6fec738d728bc59ba65bc5e12809bde0eb List of changes: `CLOUDSTACK-7887 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7887`_ fail to push snapshot to secondary storage if using multipart using swift... `CLOUDSTACK-7883 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7883`_ Allow infrastructure to handle delete of volume from DB... `CLOUDSTACK-7871 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7871`_ Fix update VirtualMachine/Template API to allow nic/disk controller details for ... `CLOUDSTACK-7855 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7855`_ Sec storage/network MTU should be on nic3 and not nic1... `CLOUDSTACK-7826 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7826`_ UI - dialog widget - dependent dropdown field (dependsOn property specified) - f... `CLOUDSTACK-7822 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7822`_ test SSL cert expired... `CLOUDSTACK-7752 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7752`_ Management Server goes in infinite loop while creating a vm with tagged local da... `CLOUDSTACK-7722 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7722`_ add.label: Add button for tags show the label not Add text... `CLOUDSTACK-7246 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7246`_ VM deployment failed due to wrong in script name createipalias.sh... Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.2 PGP release keys (signed using 4096R/AA4736F3): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan -- Regards, Tomasz Zięba Twitter: @TZieba LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/
Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #3857
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/3857/changes Changes: [sanjay.tripathi] CLOUDSTACK-7969: SC: Win8.1: Key translation fails for some EN-US keyboard keys. -- [...truncated 1828 lines...] 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 162/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 166/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 170/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 174/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 178/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 182/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 186/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 190/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 194/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 198/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 202/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 206/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 210/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 214/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 218/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 222/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 464/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 468/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 472/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 476/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 480/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 484/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 488/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 492/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 496/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 500/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 504/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 508/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 512/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 516/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 520/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 524/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 460/547 KB 206/439 KB 126/256 KB 273/276 KB 528/547 KB 206/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 528/547 KB 210/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 532/547 KB 210/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 532/547 KB 214/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 536/547 KB 214/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 540/547 KB 214/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 544/547 KB 214/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 214/439 KB 225/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 214/439 KB 229/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 214/439 KB 233/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 214/439 KB 237/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 214/439 KB 241/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 214/439 KB 245/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 214/439 KB 249/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 214/439 KB 253/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 214/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 216/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 219/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 222/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 224/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 228/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 232/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 236/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 240/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 244/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 248/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 252/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 256/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 260/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 264/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 268/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB 547/547 KB 270/439 KB 256/256 KB 276/276 KB Downloaded: http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-utils/1.5.12/plexus-utils-1.5.12.jar (276 KB at 4365.1 KB/sec) 547/547 KB 273/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 276/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 279/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 280/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 281/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 284/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 288/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 292/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 296/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 300/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 304/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 308/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 312/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 316/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 320/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 324/439 KB 256/256 KB 547/547 KB 327/439 KB 256/256 KB Downloaded: http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/commons-collections/commons-collections/3.1/commons-collections-3.1.jar (547 KB at 8955.0 KB/sec) Downloaded: http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/commons-lang/commons-lang/2.4/commons-lang-2.4.jar (256 KB at 4123.8 KB/sec)
Re: [DISCUSS] Any issues to be fixed for 4.3.1?
Thanks Rajani! How do you add a new version in JIRA, does that require special privileges? On 26-Nov-2014, at 10:13 am, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I added 4.3.2 fixversion in jira and also moved unresolved tickets from 4.1.*, 4.2.*, 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 to 4.3.2 jira filter: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.3.2%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20 ~Rajani On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Thanks Mike, done. On 24-Nov-2014, at 10:15 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Please go ahead and cherry pick 6602ad71ac97fb1875131f41bb5f92ff1e3a1c7b into 4.3.2. Thanks! Mike On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Thanks Wido, I’ve cherry-picked the fix and another fix from Will (Stevens). I’m buildling/testing it, will push on 4.3 as soon as that is done. @Mike: If your change is not changing the schema, or adding something that could break upgrade paths please go for it. If it’s already fixed, you can share the SHA with me and I can cherry-pick it and run basic build tests on it. On 20-Nov-2014, at 3:46 pm, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote: On 11/20/2014 10:15 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi, We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released and I think we should at least support this branch with a 4.3.2 release in next couple of weeks until a stable 4.5.0 is released in next couple of months. I’m going through JIRA and list of issues and will help backport fixes to the 4.3 branch. So, please share if you’ve found any blocker/critical/major issue that you found in 4.3.0 or 4.3.1 and want to be fixed. Thanks. I think that backporting this one would be useful for users: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3383 Simple fix, it's in master with 69ee01af9df8d72ccd8901d146726e74edda95d7 Wido Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework http://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is
Re: [DISCUSS] Major business logic refactoring: Move from Account to UserAccount
Hi Chiradeep, On 26-Nov-2014, at 4:32 am, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Instead of adding yet another parameter, could we look into adding a generic filter as in: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/APIReference/ApiReference-query-DescribeInstances.html But there already are so many parameters on the API, adding a filter param (map) will break semantics? May be we should do this for the next (restful) API layer we create? Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #697
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Re: [DISCUSS] Any issues to be fixed for 4.3.1?
I think it requires additional permissions ~Rajani On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Thanks Rajani! How do you add a new version in JIRA, does that require special privileges? On 26-Nov-2014, at 10:13 am, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote: I added 4.3.2 fixversion in jira and also moved unresolved tickets from 4.1.*, 4.2.*, 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 to 4.3.2 jira filter: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.3.2%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20 ~Rajani On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Thanks Mike, done. On 24-Nov-2014, at 10:15 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Please go ahead and cherry pick 6602ad71ac97fb1875131f41bb5f92ff1e3a1c7b into 4.3.2. Thanks! Mike On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Thanks Wido, I’ve cherry-picked the fix and another fix from Will (Stevens). I’m buildling/testing it, will push on 4.3 as soon as that is done. @Mike: If your change is not changing the schema, or adding something that could break upgrade paths please go for it. If it’s already fixed, you can share the SHA with me and I can cherry-pick it and run basic build tests on it. On 20-Nov-2014, at 3:46 pm, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote: On 11/20/2014 10:15 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi, We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released and I think we should at least support this branch with a 4.3.2 release in next couple of weeks until a stable 4.5.0 is released in next couple of months. I’m going through JIRA and list of issues and will help backport fixes to the 4.3 branch. So, please share if you’ve found any blocker/critical/major issue that you found in 4.3.0 or 4.3.1 and want to be fixed. Thanks. I think that backporting this one would be useful for users: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3383 Simple fix, it's in master with 69ee01af9df8d72ccd8901d146726e74edda95d7 Wido Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework http://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework http://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #698
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #3858
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/3858/changes
Re: Moving ec2stack and gstack to the cloudstack repos.
I think unit tests are great for type checking and the like, but are there any integration tests? At the moment there aren't any, we could add some using eutester very easily and chain it onto the current CI tasks. As Sebastien has mentioned earlier in this thread he has already looked at doing this a little bit. Not to sound tit-for-tat but awsapi has same issue and has much less unit testing. Any plans to add any? Its not *my personal* immediate plan, but isn't that the beauty of open source and community building? The project is open to everybody to contribute, if you see value for integration tests to be added and wish to do it then go ahead. Its a donation of code, not a we'll supply xyz software to do xyz service and be the sole maintainers of it forever. If we want things that work we need community(user and dev) support, want and time. For me EC2Stack had two primary goals: 1) Make contributing easy, we wanted to produce clean(ish) code that was easily extendable by the community so we could get some support if/when it takes off. AWSAPI is a bit terrifying to look at, there's a large amount of auto generated code and its a bit scary at first. In brief to add a new API command: - Open controllers.py, add a new API call into the actions object: e.g. 'AttachVolume': volumes.attach_volume, - Head over to the referenced module/function and fill it out e.g. https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack/blob/master/ec2stack/providers/cloudstack/volumes.py - Done. 2) Make it portable. We didn't want the AWS compatibility layer to always have to be hosted by the Cloudstack provider. We wanted the flexibility to use it against any Cloudstack 4.0.0 API. This was a success and we successfully use EC2Stack against ExoScale as shown in the earlier referenced screencast. Hope this answers your questions, Ian On 26 November 2014 at 02:47, ChunFeng chunf...@domolo.com wrote: hi all, I need help for a clean picture about the umbrella projects of cloudstack: such as : 1. the umbrella project links in cloudstack.org homepage 2. the source code structure and relations with cloudstack source code in git repos. 3. the rules for us to agree one as umbrella projects BTW, is there any others umbrella proejcts as cloudmonkey ? -- Regards, ChunFeng -- Original -- From: Sebastien Goasguenrun...@gmail.com; Date: Tue, Nov 25, 2014 06:29 AM To: devdev@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: Moving ec2stack and gstack to the cloudstack repos. On Nov 24, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: I do see a bug fix this year from Likitha and the fact that Hugo etc are making fixes is positive as well. But, the end state we desire is (a) good AWSAPI implementation with automated tests, not (b) 2 AWSAPI implementations with no tests! time for bed here, but to keep the conversation going, couple things: Hugo is fixing coverity issues kind of automatically, I don't think it represents a need. One fix from Likitha and one applied patch from me in a year is really slim. We don't test the current awsapi during the release process or upgrade, so I actually have no clue if it's working with 4.3 and 4.4. Right now I don't see tests for the current awsapi, at least not on jenkins.buildacloud.org. Current awsapi also includes S3 stuff which I think we can all agree is confusing and unused since it's really an interface to an NFS store and not a distributed object store. So the choice for me is between: -current awsapi, not clearly maintained, without tests and which state in the release is unknown and -a new implementation 6 months old, smaller code base, up to date with AWS version number, tested manually with boto, eutester and awscli and with 99% unit test coverage. — Chiradeep From: Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.commailto:run...@gmail.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Monday, November 24, 2014 at 1:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving ec2stack and gstack to the cloudstack repos. On Nov 24, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.commailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: “..nobody in the community (aside from you, Likitha and Prachi) have actually touched that code in the last two years. So if we don't maintain that code.. That’s false equivalence. Clearly it has been maintained since there are bug fixes. I don't know…I look at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/awsapi I see Hugo has fixed some coverity issues I applied a review 8 months ago the rest is older. but maybe I am not looking at this the right way. there is one review still pending:
[GitHub] cloudstack-docs pull request: Update vxlan.rst
GitHub user andrijapanic opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/8 Update vxlan.rst Added section about MTU sizes and examples. If I'v done something wrong, please let me know... You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/andrijapanic/cloudstack-docs master Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/8.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #8 commit cbd7a13622780142127f06bf2f0d2888afea3c68 Author: andrijapanic andrijapa...@users.noreply.github.com Date: 2014-11-26T12:10:32Z Update vxlan.rst Added section about MTU sizes and examples. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: Moving ec2stack and gstack to the cloudstack repos.
On Nov 26, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: I think unit tests are great for type checking and the like, but are there any integration tests? At the moment there aren't any, we could add some using eutester very easily and chain it onto the current CI tasks. As Sebastien has mentioned earlier in this thread he has already looked at doing this a little bit. Not to sound tit-for-tat but awsapi has same issue and has much less unit testing. Any plans to add any? Its not *my personal* immediate plan, but isn't that the beauty of open source and community building? The project is open to everybody to contribute, if you see value for integration tests to be added and wish to do it then go ahead. Its a donation of code, not a we'll supply xyz software to do xyz service and be the sole maintainers of it forever. If we want things that work we need community(user and dev) support, want and time. agreed with Ian. I think this falls in the category of non official roadmap items. Shall we have integration tests for this ? Yes we should What they are going to be and how they are going to be implemented (by whom and when) and run is still unknown and will depend on user traction. For me EC2Stack had two primary goals: 1) Make contributing easy, we wanted to produce clean(ish) code that was easily extendable by the community so we could get some support if/when it takes off. AWSAPI is a bit terrifying to look at, there's a large amount of auto generated code and its a bit scary at first. In brief to add a new API command: - Open controllers.py, add a new API call into the actions object: e.g. 'AttachVolume': volumes.attach_volume, - Head over to the referenced module/function and fill it out e.g. https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack/blob/master/ec2stack/providers/cloudstack/volumes.py - Done. 2) Make it portable. We didn't want the AWS compatibility layer to always have to be hosted by the Cloudstack provider. We wanted the flexibility to use it against any Cloudstack 4.0.0 API. This was a success and we successfully use EC2Stack against ExoScale as shown in the earlier referenced screencast. Hope this answers your questions, Ian On 26 November 2014 at 02:47, ChunFeng chunf...@domolo.com wrote: hi all, I need help for a clean picture about the umbrella projects of cloudstack: such as : 1. the umbrella project links in cloudstack.org homepage 2. the source code structure and relations with cloudstack source code in git repos. 3. the rules for us to agree one as umbrella projects BTW, is there any others umbrella proejcts as cloudmonkey ? -- Regards, ChunFeng -- Original -- From: Sebastien Goasguenrun...@gmail.com; Date: Tue, Nov 25, 2014 06:29 AM To: devdev@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: Moving ec2stack and gstack to the cloudstack repos. On Nov 24, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: I do see a bug fix this year from Likitha and the fact that Hugo etc are making fixes is positive as well. But, the end state we desire is (a) good AWSAPI implementation with automated tests, not (b) 2 AWSAPI implementations with no tests! time for bed here, but to keep the conversation going, couple things: Hugo is fixing coverity issues kind of automatically, I don't think it represents a need. One fix from Likitha and one applied patch from me in a year is really slim. We don't test the current awsapi during the release process or upgrade, so I actually have no clue if it's working with 4.3 and 4.4. Right now I don't see tests for the current awsapi, at least not on jenkins.buildacloud.org. Current awsapi also includes S3 stuff which I think we can all agree is confusing and unused since it's really an interface to an NFS store and not a distributed object store. So the choice for me is between: -current awsapi, not clearly maintained, without tests and which state in the release is unknown and -a new implementation 6 months old, smaller code base, up to date with AWS version number, tested manually with boto, eutester and awscli and with 99% unit test coverage. — Chiradeep From: Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.commailto:run...@gmail.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Monday, November 24, 2014 at 1:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving ec2stack and gstack to the cloudstack repos. On Nov 24, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.commailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: “..nobody in the community (aside from you, Likitha and Prachi) have actually touched that code in the last two years. So if
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #699
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
[GitHub] cloudstack-docs pull request: Update vxlan.rst
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/8#issuecomment-64636942 +1 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack-docs pull request: Update vxlan.rst
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/8 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack-docs pull request: updated instructions to install jdk1...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/6#issuecomment-64644513 +1 LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack-docs pull request: Update vxlan.rst
Github user andrijapanic commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/8#issuecomment-64644476 if there is more work to be done from my side - please let me know, otherwise I guess someone else will do the merging or similar... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack-docs pull request: updated instructions to install jdk1...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/6 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack-docs pull request: Update vxlan.rst
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/8#issuecomment-64658114 @andrijapanic feel free to edit/add more documentation and send pull requests. Thanks. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
release procedure
H, I updated the release procedure page and ported my version of build_asf.sh to the 4.5 and master branches. please have questions after a look presently yours, -- Daan
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add improved support for packaging CloudS...
Github user spark404 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/46#issuecomment-64660575 @damodarreddy That commit is good, but incomplete. I used that as the basis for this commit, but there are so many small changes between centos 6 and centos 7, that a simple if-then-else would not work. It would become unreadable. Another thing is that the old rpms have a lot of legacy code to deal with upgrades of older packages. For CentOS 7 we don't need that and would only cause more problems. So in short, yes that commit was good and hopefully i have improved on that commit with this extension. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add improved support for packaging CloudS...
Github user spark404 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/46#issuecomment-64660807 @bhaisaab @damodarreddy @wilderrodrigues To be clear, any objections to merging this? The jenkins build is here, as travis does not do packaging: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/package-centos7-test/ --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[JENKINS] Added CentOS 7 slaves
If any one needs something build or tested on CentOS 7 let me know or create a build tagged for cloudstack-buildslave-centos7 Cheers, Hugo P.S. Still looking for people willing to add slaves to jenkins. What we need are one or two fast machines capable of running the simulator tests.
Re: [JENKINS] Added CentOS 7 slaves
does it only require to run jenkins as slave? or their is any other particular requirements? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote: If any one needs something build or tested on CentOS 7 let me know or create a build tagged for cloudstack-buildslave-centos7 Cheers, Hugo P.S. Still looking for people willing to add slaves to jenkins. What we need are one or two fast machines capable of running the simulator tests.
Re: [JENKINS] Added CentOS 7 slaves
Just throwing this out there All committers have access to a msdn subscription that gives 125eur worth of azure credits. You can get a decent VM for that. On 26 Nov 2014 15:37, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: does it only require to run jenkins as slave? or their is any other particular requirements? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote: If any one needs something build or tested on CentOS 7 let me know or create a build tagged for cloudstack-buildslave-centos7 Cheers, Hugo P.S. Still looking for people willing to add slaves to jenkins. What we need are one or two fast machines capable of running the simulator tests.
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add improved support for packaging CloudS...
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/46#issuecomment-64665068 on no word the coming 24h I'll do the honours. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [JENKINS] Added CentOS 7 slaves
Basically it only needs to allow connections on port 22 with either a key or a password and Jenkins will pretty much auto configure itself to run it as a slave. So Jenkins isn’t even running on the machine, just the slave process. What i do to prepare a machine to be a (centos) slave is: * install rpmbuild, git, yum-utils * git clone the cloudstack source (or download just the spec file) * run yum-builddep on packaging/centos(63|7)/cloud.spec to install all dependencies * install mysql-server or mariadb-server (for the simulator) * remove the cloudstack sources again Cheers, Hugo On 26 nov. 2014, at 16:34, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: does it only require to run jenkins as slave? or their is any other particular requirements? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote: If any one needs something build or tested on CentOS 7 let me know or create a build tagged for cloudstack-buildslave-centos7 Cheers, Hugo P.S. Still looking for people willing to add slaves to jenkins. What we need are one or two fast machines capable of running the simulator tests.
Re: [JENKINS] Added CentOS 7 slaves
Good point, i’ll need to check if jclouds supports azure but a few dynamic slaves could be nice. Cheers, Hugo On 26 nov. 2014, at 16:39, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: Just throwing this out there All committers have access to a msdn subscription that gives 125eur worth of azure credits. You can get a decent VM for that. On 26 Nov 2014 15:37, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: does it only require to run jenkins as slave? or their is any other particular requirements? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote: If any one needs something build or tested on CentOS 7 let me know or create a build tagged for cloudstack-buildslave-centos7 Cheers, Hugo P.S. Still looking for people willing to add slaves to jenkins. What we need are one or two fast machines capable of running the simulator tests.
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add improved support for packaging CloudS...
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/46#issuecomment-64671315 No objections... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2)
Did anyone try an upgrade from a fresh 4.4.0 to 4.4.2? so far I did not had too much success but before do a negative vote I want to make sure my test env, is ok. thanks, PL On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Pierre, In my case it did not, everything worked well, but do note I manually patched the sysvm tmpl for CLOUDSTACK-7781. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2014 23:43:41 Subject: Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2) Does 4.4.2 require new set of systemvm compare to 4.4.1 ? On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Tomasz Zięba t.a.zi...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-package-rpm/ -- build 317 http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-systemvm64/ -- build 171 Regards Tom 2014-11-21 3:59 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com: Hi All, I've created a 4.4.2 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4 Commit: e0420a6fec738d728bc59ba65bc5e12809bde0eb List of changes: `CLOUDSTACK-7887 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7887`_ fail to push snapshot to secondary storage if using multipart using swift... `CLOUDSTACK-7883 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7883`_ Allow infrastructure to handle delete of volume from DB... `CLOUDSTACK-7871 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7871`_ Fix update VirtualMachine/Template API to allow nic/disk controller details for ... `CLOUDSTACK-7855 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7855`_ Sec storage/network MTU should be on nic3 and not nic1... `CLOUDSTACK-7826 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7826`_ UI - dialog widget - dependent dropdown field (dependsOn property specified) - f... `CLOUDSTACK-7822 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7822`_ test SSL cert expired... `CLOUDSTACK-7752 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7752`_ Management Server goes in infinite loop while creating a vm with tagged local da... `CLOUDSTACK-7722 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7722`_ add.label: Add button for tags show the label not Add text... `CLOUDSTACK-7246 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7246`_ VM deployment failed due to wrong in script name createipalias.sh... Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.2 PGP release keys (signed using 4096R/AA4736F3): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan -- Regards, Tomasz Zięba Twitter: @TZieba LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/
Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2)
I tried from 4.4.1; what problems are you seeing? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 26 November, 2014 17:11:10 Subject: Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2) Did anyone try an upgrade from a fresh 4.4.0 to 4.4.2? so far I did not had too much success but before do a negative vote I want to make sure my test env, is ok. thanks, PL On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Pierre, In my case it did not, everything worked well, but do note I manually patched the sysvm tmpl for CLOUDSTACK-7781. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2014 23:43:41 Subject: Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2) Does 4.4.2 require new set of systemvm compare to 4.4.1 ? On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Tomasz Zięba t.a.zi...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-package-rpm/ -- build 317 http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-systemvm64/ -- build 171 Regards Tom 2014-11-21 3:59 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com: Hi All, I've created a 4.4.2 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4 Commit: e0420a6fec738d728bc59ba65bc5e12809bde0eb List of changes: `CLOUDSTACK-7887 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7887`_ fail to push snapshot to secondary storage if using multipart using swift... `CLOUDSTACK-7883 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7883`_ Allow infrastructure to handle delete of volume from DB... `CLOUDSTACK-7871 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7871`_ Fix update VirtualMachine/Template API to allow nic/disk controller details for ... `CLOUDSTACK-7855 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7855`_ Sec storage/network MTU should be on nic3 and not nic1... `CLOUDSTACK-7826 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7826`_ UI - dialog widget - dependent dropdown field (dependsOn property specified) - f... `CLOUDSTACK-7822 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7822`_ test SSL cert expired... `CLOUDSTACK-7752 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7752`_ Management Server goes in infinite loop while creating a vm with tagged local da... `CLOUDSTACK-7722 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7722`_ add.label: Add button for tags show the label not Add text... `CLOUDSTACK-7246 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7246`_ VM deployment failed due to wrong in script name createipalias.sh... Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.2 PGP release keys (signed using 4096R/AA4736F3): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan -- Regards, Tomasz Zięba Twitter: @TZieba LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/
Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2)
ok, then, I will test 4.4.0 - 4.4.1 - 4.4.2.while doing 4.4.0 to 4.4.2 I've endup behing unable to create network because the systemvm template was not mark as ready, although, ssvm and cpvm as been upgraded to 4.4.1 system-vm template without issue. also still need the manual mysql query... On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: I tried from 4.4.1; what problems are you seeing? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 26 November, 2014 17:11:10 Subject: Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2) Did anyone try an upgrade from a fresh 4.4.0 to 4.4.2? so far I did not had too much success but before do a negative vote I want to make sure my test env, is ok. thanks, PL On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Pierre, In my case it did not, everything worked well, but do note I manually patched the sysvm tmpl for CLOUDSTACK-7781. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2014 23:43:41 Subject: Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2) Does 4.4.2 require new set of systemvm compare to 4.4.1 ? On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Tomasz Zięba t.a.zi...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-package-rpm/ -- build 317 http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-systemvm64/ -- build 171 Regards Tom 2014-11-21 3:59 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com: Hi All, I've created a 4.4.2 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4 Commit: e0420a6fec738d728bc59ba65bc5e12809bde0eb List of changes: `CLOUDSTACK-7887 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7887`_ fail to push snapshot to secondary storage if using multipart using swift... `CLOUDSTACK-7883 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7883`_ Allow infrastructure to handle delete of volume from DB... `CLOUDSTACK-7871 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7871`_ Fix update VirtualMachine/Template API to allow nic/disk controller details for ... `CLOUDSTACK-7855 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7855`_ Sec storage/network MTU should be on nic3 and not nic1... `CLOUDSTACK-7826 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7826`_ UI - dialog widget - dependent dropdown field (dependsOn property specified) - f... `CLOUDSTACK-7822 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7822`_ test SSL cert expired... `CLOUDSTACK-7752 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7752`_ Management Server goes in infinite loop while creating a vm with tagged local da... `CLOUDSTACK-7722 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7722`_ add.label: Add button for tags show the label not Add text... `CLOUDSTACK-7246 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7246`_ VM deployment failed due to wrong in script name createipalias.sh... Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.2 PGP release keys (signed using 4096R/AA4736F3): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan -- Regards, Tomasz Zięba Twitter: @TZieba LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/
Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2)
What is your setup and zone type? Some logs might help, too. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 26 November, 2014 17:20:24 Subject: Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2) ok, then, I will test 4.4.0 - 4.4.1 - 4.4.2.while doing 4.4.0 to 4.4.2 I've endup behing unable to create network because the systemvm template was not mark as ready, although, ssvm and cpvm as been upgraded to 4.4.1 system-vm template without issue. also still need the manual mysql query... On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: I tried from 4.4.1; what problems are you seeing? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 26 November, 2014 17:11:10 Subject: Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2) Did anyone try an upgrade from a fresh 4.4.0 to 4.4.2? so far I did not had too much success but before do a negative vote I want to make sure my test env, is ok. thanks, PL On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Pierre, In my case it did not, everything worked well, but do note I manually patched the sysvm tmpl for CLOUDSTACK-7781. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2014 23:43:41 Subject: Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2) Does 4.4.2 require new set of systemvm compare to 4.4.1 ? On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Tomasz Zięba t.a.zi...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-package-rpm/ -- build 317 http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-systemvm64/ -- build 171 Regards Tom 2014-11-21 3:59 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com: Hi All, I've created a 4.4.2 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4 Commit: e0420a6fec738d728bc59ba65bc5e12809bde0eb List of changes: `CLOUDSTACK-7887 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7887`_ fail to push snapshot to secondary storage if using multipart using swift... `CLOUDSTACK-7883 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7883`_ Allow infrastructure to handle delete of volume from DB... `CLOUDSTACK-7871 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7871`_ Fix update VirtualMachine/Template API to allow nic/disk controller details for ... `CLOUDSTACK-7855 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7855`_ Sec storage/network MTU should be on nic3 and not nic1... `CLOUDSTACK-7826 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7826`_ UI - dialog widget - dependent dropdown field (dependsOn property specified) - f... `CLOUDSTACK-7822 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7822`_ test SSL cert expired... `CLOUDSTACK-7752 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7752`_ Management Server goes in infinite loop while creating a vm with tagged local da... `CLOUDSTACK-7722 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7722`_ add.label: Add button for tags show the label not Add text... `CLOUDSTACK-7246 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7246`_ VM deployment failed due to wrong in script name createipalias.sh... Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.2 PGP release keys (signed using 4096R/AA4736F3): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan -- Regards, Tomasz Zięba Twitter: @TZieba LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/ http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/
Jenkins build is back to stable : simulator-singlerun #700
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/700/changes
Re: [DISCUSS] LTS Releases
I'm not really in favor of LTS support, it's a good idea, but not sure it can be backed by the community?[open question here ;)]. I don't think it fit in our current model for few reasons: - Upgrade path might become impossible as patches become part of multiple versions. We could end up with problem at database schema with the current db upgrade model. - Enforcing user to stay on a legacy ACS release disallow usage of future hypervisor version, Guest OSes and new hardware used by hypervisors. As hypervisors will become out of date, they won't be able to support new Guest OSes and new hardware. - I think the initiative would dilute the effort on the upgrade path and making sure the upgrade path is easy and always work. Since 4.3.1 as been released after 4.4.0, do we know if a 4.3.1 can be upgrade to 4.4.1 or event 4.5? - Contribution to ACS and bugfixing become nightmare as bugfix might end up in 4 branches (4.3, 4.4, 4.5, master,...) Why not as community (let's face it, not very a big one) we all focus on the next 4.5 version, make sure it's properly tested, make sure upgrade just work and have ACS 4 as the LTS ? ;-) I know a production system is not likely to run the latest version of ACS and upgrade of such a prod tool can occur maybe one or two time a year. That's just my opinion on the subject, nothing against anyone or to block the idea. On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote: Top posting here as my remarks are mainly on the original topic. I’m not in favor of supporting LTS releases as a community. The reasoning here is that there is a huge chance that we will fragment the community in people that just want to work on the latest and greatest and some other folks who are trying to keep older releases from being updated with newer fixes. It requires a lot of dedicated commitment to keep an LTS release going. Particularly if you yourself are already working with a newer release in your environment. So from a personal standpoint i can almost guarantee that i will probably not spend the time and effort of back porting any fixes i do to older versions of CloudStack. That doesn’t mean that it can’t happen. If people are willing to take charge of an LTS branch and are willing to do the work to back port fixes where appropriate i would happily support them and even try to test the releases so we can have an official release. New developers might also be scared by the fact that a fix they make has to be supported on multiple branches and might decide not to commit such a fix because of the work involved. With the rate of change in the code at the moment this is also very hard for seasoned developers, so much little, but important stuff changes all the time that back porting is very difficult. It is an open source project and generally people will want to focus on the latest and greatest and just get their features in. I’m already regularly having some trouble back porting between master and 4.5. Consider back porting to master, 4.5 and 4.3 as well and having to test each branch. Basically my point is, everyone who wants to LTS support a certain branch is free to do so. Whether or not other contributors or committers will want to do that is their choice. As a community we should not make any promises about LTS support for a certain branch. Cheers, Hugo On 25 nov. 2014, at 16:16, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hey Daan, On 25-Nov-2014, at 7:26 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: That is worrying, Rohit. As the rest of your mail is already a vote of distrust, this part says we should not release 4.4.2 as it contains regressions. Looks like you skimmed my email and missed the following from my previous email: “Note: This is not to say that 4.4.x is not stable, we’re simply saying we recommend 4.3.x because we have a confidence of its stability and we encourage serious CloudStack users to use it.” 4.4.x is probably the greatest ACS feature release ever but I would still recommend conservative users (who consult me) to stick to 4.3.x for production since we know it just works with least amount of pain. The other issue is I know a lot of people who are on ACS 4.3.x still (including ShapeBlue’s customers) want to have bugfix releases and they may not want to migrate to 4.4.x right now since 4.5.x is about 2–3 months away. ACS when consumed by enterprise companies has a typical lifecycle that lasts at least 6 months, that means someone needs to support it, therefore the idea of official LTS releases. This is a very bad signal to users and the rest of the community. What you are saying is (you in transitive form), 'we won't port fixes to 4.4 but only to 4.3 so upgrade to newer 4.3 versions and not to a 4.4 version. You have the right to do so but I don't like it. In any form I did not say anything about not helping out or not porting things.
Re: Review Request 24991: CLOUDSTACK-6697: BigSwitchVns plugin update
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24991/ --- (Updated Nov. 26, 2014, 10:52 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, David Nalley, Sebastien Goasguen, and Hugo Trippaers. Changes --- further enhancement Repository: cloudstack-git Description (updated) --- CLOUDSTACK-6697: Big Switch network plugin update 1. provide compatibility with the Big Cloud Fabric (BCF) controller L2 Connectivity Service in both VPC and non-VPC modes 2. virtual network terminology updates: VNS -- BCF_SEGMENT 3. uses HTTPS with trust-always certificate handling 4. topology sync support with BCF controller 5. support multiple (two) BCF controllers with HA 6. support VM migration Diffs (updated) - api/src/com/cloud/network/Network.java c5a9bf286df8d502a6ca33661fb52ee717643566 api/src/com/cloud/network/PhysicalNetwork.java 7c9349d932771fdbecc4a0b1ae4cad28b3d67857 client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties 3228578ce81a826f49166a72a6c67143fb12c95d client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_fr_FR.properties 54dc6215a8339b9f8c2bad9fe4c3ed18b4a702e7 client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ja_JP.properties 1962e92a4cf47978dae35a3d2b090b4c1765fecb client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ko_KR.properties ced576cb23598e7d3e5005bc24c2adf20b66a826 client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_nl_NL.properties 86653a5f5144c75e67b5a6f02c47d37bd5a71ef0 client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_pt_BR.properties fa77633a650f1b37d8398a8936bbf84f5b4a40e3 client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ru_RU.properties 7f57daa58bef379ddb47acb88965d0defe32ad73 client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_zh_CN.properties 217849582b41cb2c63a0e305e5613af6f659d11d client/pom.xml 6803f9a11fd2c80523ea16bdd35f2a4d163f953c client/tomcatconf/commands.properties.in a87d1677f24657299ec24d4ce9df9a180a62bd0c engine/schema/src/com/cloud/user/dao/VmDiskStatisticsDaoImpl.java e1136d3cf567b73fd1198181aea4d6995df6b78a plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/pom.xml afb267cdb5bc52aea23bc6739ea21d8f52e94ede plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/vns/module.properties 5783d38e5cb78be0d418c80981246d721d18b62a plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/vns/spring-vns-context.xml d5bb92afe3d3051dbdd4b4d49698c313c77d255f plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/agent/api/CreateVnsNetworkAnswer.java e950abe3bed85b75a20be2b8c4537a2fbd6be39e plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/agent/api/CreateVnsNetworkCommand.java 534bb7f9f9154a652a20310fe020bddc4249ef54 plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/agent/api/CreateVnsPortAnswer.java 82c2fe90d63e0148bca8de9ce8612e4dd53cf735 plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/agent/api/CreateVnsPortCommand.java c3b9a9d6d9504e34cbe1294ac640f56aab101395 plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/agent/api/DeleteVnsNetworkAnswer.java 72ac98ac9e0a1ae4858019e3baccc160300e24bf plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/agent/api/DeleteVnsNetworkCommand.java 6cf169bbfc97b57561af729aef297c76230fd118 plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/agent/api/DeleteVnsPortAnswer.java 076b187fdf48cf776902dc9a91dc26e00396158a plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/agent/api/DeleteVnsPortCommand.java 0cae01d471dd9c5c504002c24f865ded59812d9e plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/agent/api/StartupBigSwitchVnsCommand.java 8310b0763708c3f049ef4ce427d09f0c07cd05b3 plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/agent/api/UpdateVnsPortAnswer.java 39cd26649c9bb0c4993f55bef65edfc326c4ceda plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/agent/api/UpdateVnsPortCommand.java 40f09207606115a5d0ec7f9378c4c52d16405dfd plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/api/commands/AddBigSwitchVnsDeviceCmd.java 5c6f555c8a40a4b785aed6fdfa743131006be209 plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/api/commands/DeleteBigSwitchVnsDeviceCmd.java 1e2155dcd899bc11f9e9463cec432c020751e905 plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/api/commands/ListBigSwitchVnsDevicesCmd.java 4cde78e503935f7ba3b4a90a6f4568f0dd32c7ab plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/api/commands/VnsConstants.java 7942b6f2be3467465334b0628577b87564dbdab2 plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/api/response/BigSwitchVnsDeviceResponse.java 790ac9c6afbee9156cb8d26ee2a2b5980fe4ce18 plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/network/BigSwitchVnsDeviceVO.java 01b5d49a90bb4428716d6b9c344d4ccfc97fb34f plugins/network-elements/bigswitch-vns/src/com/cloud/network/bigswitch/AttachmentData.java f1866e2621b6f9c19e4a9be310791b086ce3a350
Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #658
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/658/ -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-87d (cloudstack-buildslave-centos6) in workspace http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/ws/ /usr/bin/git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=400 Fetching changes from the remote Git repository /usr/bin/git config remote.origin.url git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git # timeout=400 Fetching upstream changes from git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git /usr/bin/git --version # timeout=400 /usr/bin/git fetch --tags --progress git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* FATAL: Failed to fetch from git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:647) at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.retrieveChanges(GitSCM.java:889) at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.checkout(GitSCM.java:914) at hudson.model.AbstractProject.checkout(AbstractProject.java:1258) at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.defaultCheckout(AbstractBuild.java:622) at jenkins.scm.SCMCheckoutStrategy.checkout(SCMCheckoutStrategy.java:86) at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.run(AbstractBuild.java:528) at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1759) at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43) at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:89) at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:240) Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Command /usr/bin/git fetch --tags --progress git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* returned status code 128: stdout: stderr: git.apache.org[0: 192.87.106.249]: errno=Connection timed out fatal: unable to connect a socket (Connection timed out) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandIn(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1435) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandWithCredentials(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1223) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.access$300(CliGitAPIImpl.java:85) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl$1.execute(CliGitAPIImpl.java:280) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:153) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:146) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:121) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:49) at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:324) at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:68) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:701) at ..remote call to cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-87d(Native Method) at hudson.remoting.Channel.attachCallSiteStackTrace(Channel.java:1356) at hudson.remoting.UserResponse.retrieve(UserRequest.java:221) at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:752) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.execute(RemoteGitImpl.java:146) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor172.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.invoke(RemoteGitImpl.java:132) at sun.proxy.$Proxy109.execute(Unknown Source) at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:645) ... 10 more
Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #659
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/659/changes
Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #1967
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/1967/changes Changes: [amogh.vasekar] CLOUDSTACK-7977 -- [...truncated 22781 lines...] 206/405 KB 210/405 KB 214/405 KB 218/405 KB 222/405 KB 226/405 KB 229/405 KB 233/405 KB 237/405 KB 241/405 KB 245/405 KB 249/405 KB 253/405 KB 257/405 KB 261/405 KB 265/405 KB 269/405 KB 273/405 KB 277/405 KB 281/405 KB 285/405 KB 289/405 KB 293/405 KB 297/405 KB 301/405 KB 305/405 KB 309/405 KB 313/405 KB 317/405 KB 321/405 KB 325/405 KB 329/405 KB 333/405 KB 337/405 KB 338/405 KB 341/405 KB 345/405 KB 349/405 KB 353/405 KB 357/405 KB 361/405 KB 365/405 KB 369/405 KB 373/405 KB 377/405 KB 381/405 KB 385/405 KB 389/405 KB 393/405 KB 397/405 KB 401/405 KB 405/405 KB 405/405 KB Downloaded: http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/jstl/jstl/1.2/jstl-1.2.jar (405 KB at 4815.8 KB/sec) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-engine-network --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/network/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-engine-network --- [INFO] Compiling 1 source file to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/network/target/classes [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-usage --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run (generate-resource) @ cloud-usage --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-engine-orchestration --- [INFO] Compiling 68 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/orchestration/target/classes [INFO] Executing tasks main: [copy] Copying 2 files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/usage/target/transformed [INFO] Executed tasks [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-usage --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-usage --- [INFO] Compiling 19 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/usage/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-engine-network --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/network/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-engine-network --- [INFO] No sources to compile [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-network --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/engine/network/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Results : Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-usage --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 8 resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-usage --- [INFO] Compiling 4 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/usage/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Developer Tools - Checkstyle Configuration SUCCESS [1.844s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack . SUCCESS [1.471s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Maven Conventions Parent SUCCESS [2.536s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Managed Context . SUCCESS [5.104s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Utils ... SUCCESS [14.241s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework ... SUCCESS [0.205s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework
Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #1968
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/1968/
Review Request 28489: CLOUDSTACK-7978 : Fixed the script 'test_egress_rules.py' - Zone Network Type Information should to be passed to VirtualMachine create method
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28489/ --- Review request for cloudstack and sangeetha hariharan. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7978 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7978 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Currently, test cases in the test suite do not pass the Zone Network Type to the Virtual Machine class create method. This doesn't cause any problem with majority of the configurations except EIP-ELB Configuration. Hence Zone Network Type Information should be passed consciously to the create method to cover EIP-ELB Configuration. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_egress_rules.py 0f05c07 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28489/diff/ Testing --- Executed One Test to prove the fix: Test authorize ingress rule ... === TestName: test_authorizeIngressRule | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 126.613s OK Thanks, Chandan Purushothama
Review Request 28490: CLOUDSTACK-7979 : Fixed the script 'test_security_groups.py' - Zone Network Type Information should to be passed to VirtualMachine create method
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28490/ --- Review request for cloudstack and sangeetha hariharan. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7979 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7979 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Currently, test cases in the test suite do not pass the Zone Network Type to the Virtual Machine class create method. This doesn't cause any problem with majority of the configurations except EIP-ELB Configuration. Hence Zone Network Type Information should be passed consciously to the create method to cover EIP-ELB Configuration. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_security_groups.py 89317f4 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28490/diff/ Testing --- Executed One Test to prove the fix. This test belongs to a different test suite. But the fix is the same: Test authorize ingress rule ... === TestName: test_authorizeIngressRule | Status : SUCCESS === ok Ran 1 test in 126.613s OK Thanks, Chandan Purushothama
Review Request 28492: CLOUDSTACK-7980 : Fixed the script '/maint/test_egress_rules_host_maintenance.py' - Zone Network Type Information should to be passed to VirtualMachine create method
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28492/ --- Review request for cloudstack and sangeetha hariharan. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7980 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7980 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Currently, test cases in the test suite do not pass the Zone Network Type to the Virtual Machine class create method. This doesn't cause any problem with majority of the configurations except EIP-ELB Configuration. Hence Zone Network Type Information should be passed consciously to the create method to cover EIP-ELB Configuration. Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_egress_rules_host_maintenance.py a27ada3 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28492/diff/ Testing --- Executed One Test to prove the fix. This test belongs to a different test suite. But the fix is the same: Test authorize ingress rule ... === TestName: test_authorizeIngressRule | Status : SUCCESS === ok Ran 1 test in 126.613s OK Thanks, Chandan Purushothama
Jenkins build became unstable: simulator-singlerun #702
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/702/changes
Re: Review Request 28489: CLOUDSTACK-7978 : Fixed the script 'test_egress_rules.py' - Zone Network Type Information should to be passed to VirtualMachine create method
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28489/#review63164 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Nov. 27, 2014, 12:09 a.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28489/ --- (Updated Nov. 27, 2014, 12:09 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and sangeetha hariharan. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7978 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7978 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Currently, test cases in the test suite do not pass the Zone Network Type to the Virtual Machine class create method. This doesn't cause any problem with majority of the configurations except EIP-ELB Configuration. Hence Zone Network Type Information should be passed consciously to the create method to cover EIP-ELB Configuration. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_egress_rules.py 0f05c07 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28489/diff/ Testing --- Executed One Test to prove the fix: Test authorize ingress rule ... === TestName: test_authorizeIngressRule | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 126.613s OK Thanks, Chandan Purushothama
Re: Review Request 28490: CLOUDSTACK-7979 : Fixed the script 'test_security_groups.py' - Zone Network Type Information should to be passed to VirtualMachine create method
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28490/#review63165 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Nov. 27, 2014, 12:14 a.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28490/ --- (Updated Nov. 27, 2014, 12:14 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and sangeetha hariharan. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7979 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7979 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Currently, test cases in the test suite do not pass the Zone Network Type to the Virtual Machine class create method. This doesn't cause any problem with majority of the configurations except EIP-ELB Configuration. Hence Zone Network Type Information should be passed consciously to the create method to cover EIP-ELB Configuration. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_security_groups.py 89317f4 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28490/diff/ Testing --- Executed One Test to prove the fix. This test belongs to a different test suite. But the fix is the same: Test authorize ingress rule ... === TestName: test_authorizeIngressRule | Status : SUCCESS === ok Ran 1 test in 126.613s OK Thanks, Chandan Purushothama
Re: Review Request 28492: CLOUDSTACK-7980 : Fixed the script '/maint/test_egress_rules_host_maintenance.py' - Zone Network Type Information should to be passed to VirtualMachine create method
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28492/#review63166 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Nov. 27, 2014, 12:19 a.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28492/ --- (Updated Nov. 27, 2014, 12:19 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and sangeetha hariharan. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7980 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7980 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Currently, test cases in the test suite do not pass the Zone Network Type to the Virtual Machine class create method. This doesn't cause any problem with majority of the configurations except EIP-ELB Configuration. Hence Zone Network Type Information should be passed consciously to the create method to cover EIP-ELB Configuration. Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_egress_rules_host_maintenance.py a27ada3 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28492/diff/ Testing --- Executed One Test to prove the fix. This test belongs to a different test suite. But the fix is the same: Test authorize ingress rule ... === TestName: test_authorizeIngressRule | Status : SUCCESS === ok Ran 1 test in 126.613s OK Thanks, Chandan Purushothama
What is this BaremetalDhcpProvider?
Hi, I'm playing with various network settings in ACS, today I was trying to create a network that uses BaremetalDhcpProvider. What is this provider? `list networkserviceproviders` doesn't say anything about Bare metal. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #704
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/704/changes Changes: [sangeetha.hariharan] CLOUDSTACK-7978 : Fixed the script 'test_egress_rules.py' - Zone Network Type Information should to be passed to VirtualMachine create method [sangeetha.hariharan] CLOUDSTACK-7979 : Fixed the script 'test_security_groups.py' - Zone Network Type Information should to be passed to VirtualMachine create method [sangeetha.hariharan] CLOUDSTACK-7980 : Fixed the script '/maint/test_egress_rules_host_maintenance.py' - Zone Network Type Information should to be passed to VirtualMachine create method -- [...truncated 575 lines...] at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:113) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74) 2014-11-26 20:35:20,446 ERROR [utils.rest.RESTServiceConnector] (main:) Failed to retrieve object : null 2014-11-26 20:35:20,453 ERROR [utils.rest.RESTServiceConnector] (main:) IOException caught while trying to connect to the REST Service java.io.IOException at com.cloud.utils.rest.RESTValidationStrategy.executeMethod(RESTValidationStrategy.java:106) at com.cloud.utils.rest.RESTServiceConnector.executeMethod(RESTServiceConnector.java:277) at com.cloud.utils.rest.RESTServiceConnector.executeUpdateObject(RESTServiceConnector.java:183) at com.cloud.utils.rest.RESTServiceConnectorTest.testExecuteUpdateObjectException(RESTServiceConnectorTest.java:273) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.ExpectException.evaluate(ExpectException.java:19) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:236) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:134) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:113) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74) Tests run:
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #703
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Jenkins build is unstable: simulator-singlerun #705
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/705/changes
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #706
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Add improved support for packaging CloudS...
Github user damodarreddy commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/46#issuecomment-64747208 No Objections --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Fwd: CloudStack Job offering @exoscale
I think this is legitimate on dev@ Note that there are also jobs available at interoute. Begin forwarded message: From: Coetsier, Antoine antoine.coets...@exoscale.ch Subject: CloudStack Job offering @exoscale Date: November 26, 2014 5:20:57 PM GMT+01:00 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org us...@cloudstack.apache.org Reply-To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Hello All, We are looking for a developer that already has some knowledge of CloudStack to join our team at Exoscale. Trendy topics about network functions/distributed LB in CS for this full time job. This is based in Switzerland of course. The job description is here: https://www.exoscale.ch/jobs/ Get in touch with us at: hr -AT- exoscale.ch Thank you, -- Antoine COETSIER – EXOSCALE CEO
