new user in Jira

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

 Hi,

I'm not sure about the process but we have Patrick Dube (pdube) that we
would like he have access to Jira so he can assign to himself some
cloudstack issues.  Do we have to open a helpdesk ticket for this ?
He have an account on issues.apache.org/jira but he can't assign issues to
himself.


Thanks,

PL

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8883: Resolved c...

[remibergsma]

Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/863#issuecomment-142392881
  
Thanks @borisroman will try to test soon!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

CLOUDSTACK-8793 (s2s fix) blocked by CLOUDSTACK-8890 (project bug)

[Patrick Dube]

Hello,

I have implemented a fix for Site to site VPNs for projects (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8793) which is tested in
4.5.2, but I cannot test it on master because of bug
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8890. How do I proceed?

Thank you,

Patrick Dube

Re: CLOUDSTACK-8793 (s2s fix) blocked by CLOUDSTACK-8890 (project bug)

[Will Stevens]

It is very important that we get CLOUDSTACK-8890
 fixed because this
breaks all the functionality for projects.  This is a HUGE regression for
those of us who use projects.

Assuming 8890 gets fixed, the S2S VPN fix can be tested and merged into
master.  I would suggest we also backport the 8793 fix back to 4.5.2 (or
.3) once it gets into master since the S2S VPN functionality is currently
broken for projects in 4.5.x.

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Patrick Dube 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have implemented a fix for Site to site VPNs for projects (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8793) which is tested in
> 4.5.2, but I cannot test it on master because of bug
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8890. How do I proceed?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Patrick Dube
>

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fixed box location on vagrant files

[pdube]

GitHub user pdube opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/875

Fixed box location on vagrant files

The centos-6.5 is no longer available

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/pdube/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-8898

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/875.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #875


commit 3f8f6eb7909040556d1df257914f8bd2f813711b
Author: Patrick Dube 
Date:   2015-09-22T19:04:01Z

Fixed box location on vagrant files




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: new user in Jira

[Erik Weber]

In my experience you just wait for someone with karma to fix it :-)

Erik


Den tirsdag 22. september 2015 skrev Pierre-Luc Dion 
følgende:

>  Hi,
>
> I'm not sure about the process but we have Patrick Dube (pdube) that we
> would like he have access to Jira so he can assign to himself some
> cloudstack issues.  Do we have to open a helpdesk ticket for this ?
> He have an account on issues.apache.org/jira but he can't assign issues to
> himself.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> PL
>

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8894: Restrict vGPU enabled VM...

[anshul1886]

GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/868

CLOUDSTACK-8894: Restrict vGPU enabled VMs dynamic scaling if new service 
offering has different vGPU type



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/anshul1886/cloudstack-1 CLOUDSTACK-8894

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/868.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #868


commit 8c00e443cdee98eddbcf01537cbf14a350379e25
Author: Anshul Gangwar 
Date:   2015-09-22T06:14:11Z

CLOUDSTACK-8894: Restrict vGPU enabled VMs dynamic scaling if new service 
offering has different vGPU type




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[DISCUSS] Update service offering host tags

[ilya]

Is there any reason why we cant alter hosttags for service offering once
its created? i've done it many times from the backend and not seen any
issues, but i wonder if there any technical reason..

Thanks
ilya

Re: new user in Jira

[David Nalley]

As a PMC member, you should have karma to fix this, just add him to
the list of contributors. If you don't let me know and we'll sort your
karma.

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:
>  Hi,
>
> I'm not sure about the process but we have Patrick Dube (pdube) that we
> would like he have access to Jira so he can assign to himself some
> cloudstack issues.  Do we have to open a helpdesk ticket for this ?
> He have an account on issues.apache.org/jira but he can't assign issues to
> himself.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> PL

Re: jenkins disk full ?

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi David,
disk space issue again. Can you please do a little more cleanup?

http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/computer/coohq-slave-01/executors/0/causeOfDeath

~Rajani



On 18-Sep-2015, at 11:59 pm, David Nalley  wrote:

> I freed up a little bit of space, but we'll have to do something
> different in the long term.
> 
> --David
> 
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Srikanteswararao (or any one having access to jenkins server), do you think
>> you could do some more magic here?  We ran out of space again on the master
>> jenkins server for  j.bac.o.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> PL
>> 
>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:
>> 
>>> thanks  Srikanteswararao, it worked  and we have centos63 rpm now for
>>> master branch!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> *Pierre-Luc DION*
>>> Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
>>> t 855.652.5683
>>> 
>>> *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
>>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Srikanteswararao talluri <
>>> tall...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
 There is no space .
 
 /dev/xvdf1   50G   47G 0 100% /var/lib/jenkins/workspace
 
 I have cleaned up builds for 'fastsimulatorbuild' job which were using 9G.
 Modified the job to delete old builds and artefacts after 30
 builds/30days.
 
 
 ~Talluri
 
 On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion 
 wrote:
 
> Can someone that have access to the principal jenkins server to check
 disk
> space left?
> 
> getting this error on few slave, the one I've check does not have disk
 full
> 
> 
> Thread has died
> 
> java.io.IOException: No space left on device
>at java.io.FileOutputStream.writeBytes(Native Method)
>at java.io.FileOutputStream.write(FileOutputStream.java:318)
>at sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder.writeBytes(StreamEncoder.java:221)
>at sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder.implClose(StreamEncoder.java:316)
>at sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder.close(StreamEncoder.java:149)
>at java.io.OutputStreamWriter.close(OutputStreamWriter.java:233)
>at java.io.BufferedWriter.close(BufferedWriter.java:266)
>at hudson.util.AtomicFileWriter.close(AtomicFileWriter.java:94)
>at
 hudson.util.AtomicFileWriter.commit(AtomicFileWriter.java:109)
>at hudson.util.TextFile.write(TextFile.java:121)
>at hudson.model.Job.saveNextBuildNumber(Job.java:274)
>at hudson.model.Job.assignBuildNumber(Job.java:332)
>at hudson.model.Run.(Run.java:286)
>at hudson.model.AbstractBuild.(AbstractBuild.java:167)
>at hudson.model.Build.(Build.java:92)
>at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.(FreeStyleBuild.java:34)
>at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native
> Method)
>at
> 
 sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
>at
> 
 sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
>at
 java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:525)
>at
> jenkins.model.lazy.LazyBuildMixIn.newBuild(LazyBuildMixIn.java:186)
>at
 hudson.model.AbstractProject.newBuild(AbstractProject.java:1000)
>at
> hudson.model.AbstractProject.createExecutable(AbstractProject.java:1193)
>at
> hudson.model.AbstractProject.createExecutable(AbstractProject.java:143)
>at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:213)
> 
> more info 
> 
> 
> 
> ref:
> 
 http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/computer/cca-slave-02/executors/0/causeOfDeath
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
 
>>> 
>>> 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fixed box location on vagrant files for d...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/875#issuecomment-142487306
  
I faced the same issue and using bento/centos6.7 fixed it.
:+1: tested only in advanced


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8883: Resolved c...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/863#issuecomment-142491036
  
I tested this using redhat 6.3 as KVM hypervisor 
host is in UP state after stop/start of management server
Force reconnect of the host also worked.

:+1: 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8893: Fixing script as per the...

[nitt10prashant]

Github user nitt10prashant commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/871#issuecomment-142493294
  
LGTM!!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8883: Resolved c...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/863#issuecomment-142499721
  
ok. merging now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: new user in Jira

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi PL,
I added Patrick to the contributors list.
I also added you to the PMC list on jira. 

~Rajani



On 23-Sep-2015, at 3:59 am, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:

> Thanks guys for the quick response. Ill recheck but I didn't had such a
> great karma when we look at it earlier today.
> 
> Regards,
> On Sep 22, 2015 16:10, "David Nalley"  wrote:
> 
>> As a PMC member, you should have karma to fix this, just add him to
>> the list of contributors. If you don't let me know and we'll sort your
>> karma.
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion 
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure about the process but we have Patrick Dube (pdube) that we
>>> would like he have access to Jira so he can assign to himself some
>>> cloudstack issues.  Do we have to open a helpdesk ticket for this ?
>>> He have an account on issues.apache.org/jira but he can't assign issues
>> to
>>> himself.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> PL
>> 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8893: Fixing script as per the...

[pavanb018]

Github user pavanb018 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/871#issuecomment-142497091
  
@Desc: Test that Volume snapshot for root volume not allowed ... === 
TestName: test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

Sanju1010 , is the above description part of script ? The description looks 
misleading with the current functionality. If it is not part of the code then 
LGTM !! , else please modify the description so that it wont be confusing. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8883: Resolved c...

[pvr9711]

Github user pvr9711 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/863#issuecomment-142499253
  
Thanks Boris, the functionality is working now- agent log shows 
reconnecting to MS when a connection is lost.  Let's merge this!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: new user in Jira

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

Thanks guys for the quick response. Ill recheck but I didn't had such a
great karma when we look at it earlier today.

Regards,
On Sep 22, 2015 16:10, "David Nalley"  wrote:

> As a PMC member, you should have karma to fix this, just add him to
> the list of contributors. If you don't let me know and we'll sort your
> karma.
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion 
> wrote:
> >  Hi,
> >
> > I'm not sure about the process but we have Patrick Dube (pdube) that we
> > would like he have access to Jira so he can assign to himself some
> > cloudstack issues.  Do we have to open a helpdesk ticket for this ?
> > He have an account on issues.apache.org/jira but he can't assign issues
> to
> > himself.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > PL
>

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

[pdion891]

Github user pdion891 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r40155285
  
--- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/vpn/etc/ipsec.d/l2tp.conf ---
@@ -30,4 +33,6 @@ conn L2TP-PSK
 # --
 # Change 'ignore' to 'add' to enable this configuration.
 #
+
+rightsubnetwithin=10.1.2.0/8
--- End diff --

Has @terbolous is pointing out, could it be possible to use subnet defined 
in the VPC or guest network instead of hardcoding 10./8 ?

Regards,


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [DISCUSS] Update service offering host tags

[Mike Tutkowski]

We have the same restriction for storage tags in a compute and
disk offering.

I had initially assumed it was due to the following: If we, say, deployed a
VM to a host with the host tag X that we wanted to make sure that the
VM could only be migrated to those hosts that are tagged as X.

This doesn't appear to be the case, though. It seems that you can deploy a
VM to a host tagged as X and then migrate it to a host not tagged as X.

That being the case, it seems the host tags field should be mutable in a
compute offering.

On Tuesday, September 22, 2015, ilya  wrote:

> Is there any reason why we cant alter hosttags for service offering once
> its created? i've done it many times from the backend and not seen any
> issues, but i wonder if there any technical reason..
>
> Thanks
> ilya
>


-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
*™*

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fixed box location on vagrant files for d...

[pdion891]

Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/875#issuecomment-142443876
  
@pdube, we forgot to review that earlier but I think 
```binary-installation-advanced``` and  ```binary-installation-basic``` need to 
be updated as well. Can you update your PR ?  thanks! 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Build failed in Jenkins: build-systemvm-master #630

[jenkins]

See 

Changes:

[koushik] CLOUDSTACK-8826: XenServer - Use device id passed as part of attach 
volume API properly

--
[...truncated 5973 lines...]
++ [[ 

 == '' ]]
++ hooks+=("$PWD/.rvm/hooks")
++ _hooks_list=($(
__rvm_find -L "${hooks[@]}" -iname "$rvm_hook*" -type f 2>/dev/null
  ))
+++ __rvm_find -L '' 

 -iname 'after_cd*' -type f
++ unset rvm_hook hooks _hooks_list hook
+ true
+ tar cf ../systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0.box .
+ mv box/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0.box dist/
+ log INFO 'systemvmtemplate exported for vagrant: 
dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0.box'
+ local level=INFO
+ shift
+ [[ 1 != \1 ]]
+ local code=
++ date '+%F %T'
+ local 'line=[2015-09-22 22:22:07] INFO: systemvmtemplate exported for 
vagrant: dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0.box'
+ '[' -t 2 ']'
+ echo '[2015-09-22 22:22:07] INFO: systemvmtemplate exported for vagrant: 
dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0.box'
[2015-09-22 22:22:07] INFO: systemvmtemplate exported for vagrant: 
dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0.box
+ hyperv_export eb83cacb-0ffb-468d-974b-4fd887338983
+ log INFO 'creating hyperv export'
+ local level=INFO
+ shift
+ [[ 1 != \1 ]]
+ local code=
++ date '+%F %T'
+ local 'line=[2015-09-22 22:22:07] INFO: creating hyperv export'
+ '[' -t 2 ']'
+ echo '[2015-09-22 22:22:07] INFO: creating hyperv export'
[2015-09-22 22:22:07] INFO: creating hyperv export
+ local hdd_uuid=eb83cacb-0ffb-468d-974b-4fd887338983
+ vboxmanage clonehd eb83cacb-0ffb-468d-974b-4fd887338983 
systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd --format VHD
0%...10%...20%...30%...40%...50%...60%...70%...80%...90%...100%
Clone hard disk created in format 'VHD'. UUID: 
bae11957-3e9e-4f52-b143-958f6ba1bec3
+ zip systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd.zip 
systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd
  adding: systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd (deflated 74%)
+ add_on_exit rm systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd
+ local n=8
+ on_exit_items[${n}]='rm systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd'
+ '[' 8 -eq 0 ']'
+ mv systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd.zip dist/
+ log INFO 'systemvmtemplate exported for HyperV: 
dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd.zip'
+ local level=INFO
+ shift
+ [[ 1 != \1 ]]
+ local code=
++ date '+%F %T'
+ local 'line=[2015-09-22 22:22:59] INFO: systemvmtemplate exported for HyperV: 
dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd.zip'
+ '[' -t 2 ']'
+ echo '[2015-09-22 22:22:59] INFO: systemvmtemplate exported for HyperV: 
dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd.zip'
[2015-09-22 22:22:59] INFO: systemvmtemplate exported for HyperV: 
dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd.zip
+ md5sum dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0.box 
dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd.zip 
dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2 
dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-ovm.raw.bz2 
dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-vmware.ova 
dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-vmware.vmdk.bz2 
dist/systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-xen.vhd.bz2
+ add_on_exit log INFO 'BUILD SUCCESSFUL'
+ local n=9
+ on_exit_items[${n}]='log INFO BUILD SUCCESSFUL'
+ '[' 9 -eq 0 ']'
+ on_exit
+ (( i=10-1  ))
+ (( i>=0  ))
+ sleep 2
+ log DEBUG 'on_exit: log INFO BUILD SUCCESSFUL'
+ local level=DEBUG
+ shift
+ [[ 1 != \1 ]]
+ local code=
++ date '+%F %T'
+ local 'line=[2015-09-22 22:23:08] DEBUG: on_exit: log INFO BUILD SUCCESSFUL'
+ '[' -t 2 ']'
+ echo '[2015-09-22 22:23:08] DEBUG: on_exit: log INFO BUILD SUCCESSFUL'
[2015-09-22 22:23:08] DEBUG: on_exit: log INFO BUILD SUCCESSFUL
+ eval log INFO BUILD SUCCESSFUL
++ log INFO BUILD SUCCESSFUL
++ local level=INFO
++ shift
++ [[ 1 != \1 ]]
++ local code=
+++ date '+%F %T'
++ local 'line=[2015-09-22 22:23:08] INFO: BUILD SUCCESSFUL'
++ '[' -t 2 ']'
++ echo '[2015-09-22 22:23:08] INFO: BUILD SUCCESSFUL'
[2015-09-22 22:23:08] INFO: BUILD SUCCESSFUL
+ (( i--  ))
+ (( i>=0  ))
+ sleep 2
+ log DEBUG 'on_exit: rm systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd'
+ local level=DEBUG
+ shift
+ [[ 1 != \1 ]]
+ local code=
++ date '+%F %T'
+ local 'line=[2015-09-22 22:23:10] DEBUG: on_exit: rm 
systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd'
+ '[' -t 2 ']'
+ echo '[2015-09-22 22:23:10] DEBUG: on_exit: rm 
systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd'
[2015-09-22 22:23:10] DEBUG: on_exit: rm 
systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd
+ eval rm systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd
++ rm systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-hyperv.vhd
+ (( i--  ))
+ (( i>=0  ))
+ sleep 2
+ log DEBUG 'on_exit: rm -f systemvmtemplate-master-4.6.0-vmware.ovf-orig'
+ local level=DEBUG
+ shift
+ [[ 1 != \1 ]]
+ local code=
++ date '+%F %T'
+ local 'line=[2015-09-22 22:23:13] DEBUG: on_exit: rm -f 

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #2335

[jenkins]

See 

--
[...truncated 8165 lines...]
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- cobertura-maven-plugin:2.6:cobertura (default-cli) @ 
cloud-quickcloud ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO] 
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Developer Tools - Checkstyle Configuration  SUCCESS 
[3.943s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack . SUCCESS [2.108s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Maven Conventions Parent  SUCCESS [1.995s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Managed Context . SUCCESS [21.159s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Utils ... SUCCESS [1:28.280s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework ... SUCCESS [0.104s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS [51.291s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Configuration ... SUCCESS [26.815s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack API . SUCCESS [2:00.313s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - REST  SUCCESS [16.057s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - IPC . SUCCESS [30.321s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine  SUCCESS [0.088s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API  SUCCESS [29.480s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Security  SUCCESS [33.767s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Core  SUCCESS [1:17.157s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Agents .. SUCCESS [36.525s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Clustering .. SUCCESS [37.738s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS [15.029s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component ... SUCCESS [2:03.705s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Jobs  SUCCESS [42.410s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Internal Components API  SUCCESS [25.330s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Server .. SUCCESS [4:09.839s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Usage Server  SUCCESS [46.567s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Orchestration Component  SUCCESS 
[1:26.545s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Services .. SUCCESS [0.107s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage ... SUCCESS [0.546s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage Service ... SUCCESS [55.238s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Component  SUCCESS [47.831s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Volume Component . SUCCESS [30.471s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Image Component .. SUCCESS [25.999s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Data Motion Component  SUCCESS [22.474s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Cache Component .. SUCCESS [21.367s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Snapshot Component  SUCCESS [33.717s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API  SUCCESS [11.649s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Service  SUCCESS [6.662s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin POM .. SUCCESS [0.796s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API Rate Limit . SUCCESS [26.915s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Storage Volume default provider  SUCCESS 
[23.433s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Storage Volume SolidFire Provider  SUCCESS 
[35.127s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API SolidFire .. SUCCESS [17.202s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API Discovery .. SUCCESS [23.235s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - ACL Static Role Based .. SUCCESS [14.640s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Host Anti-Affinity Processor  SUCCESS 
[17.468s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Explicit Dedication Processor  SUCCESS 
[21.459s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - User Concentrated Pod Deployment Planner  
SUCCESS [15.975s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - User Dispersing Deployment Planner  SUCCESS 
[17.254s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Implicit Dedication Planner  SUCCESS [27.637s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Skip Heurestics Planner  SUCCESS [15.130s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Host Allocator Random .. SUCCESS [17.654s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Dedicated Resources  SUCCESS [32.478s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervisor OracleVM  SUCCESS [33.558s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Open vSwitch ... SUCCESS [35.148s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervisor XenServer ... SUCCESS [1:17.111s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervisor KVM . SUCCESS [1:13.456s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - RabbitMQ Event Bus . SUCCESS [18.664s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - In Memory Event Bus  SUCCESS [20.030s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Kafka Event Bus  SUCCESS [14.593s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervisor Baremetal ... SUCCESS [40.299s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervisor UCS . SUCCESS [26.204s]
[INFO] 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8883: Resolved c...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/863


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8751 minimise downtime of netw...

[insom]

Github user insom commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/866#issuecomment-142211053
  
I really like the look of this feature. I don't want to come across as too 
negative with respect to some niggles with the code formatting.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8893: Fixing script as per the...

[sanju1010]

GitHub user sanju1010 opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/871

CLOUDSTACK-8893: Fixing script as per the latest functionality

Please check https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8893 for more 
details.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/sanju1010/cloudstack vmsnap

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/871.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #871


commit 85fad5ae76c97ca17d258245007906a96aa04c21
Author: sanjeev 
Date:   2015-09-22T09:17:37Z

CLOUDSTACK-8893: Fixing script as per the latest functionality




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8895: Verify if storage on sto...

[pritisarap12]

GitHub user pritisarap12 opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/869

CLOUDSTACK-8895: Verify if storage on storage pool can be attached to VM

Test case to verify if data volume uploaded in a storage pool(Cluster wide 
storage pool) is available for attachment to a Virtual Machine.and also check 
that after attachment the volume is in correct storage pool.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/pritisarap12/cloudstack 
CLOUDSTACK-8895-Verify-if-storage-can-be-selected-when-attaching-uploaded-data-volume-to-VM

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/869.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #869


commit 48544cc7d007f05927bb291ee50871276e75
Author: Priti Sarap 
Date:   2015-09-22T07:41:44Z

CLOUDSTACK-8895: Verify if storage can be selected when attaching uploaded 
data volume to VM




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8883: Resolved c...

[wido]

Github user wido commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/863#discussion_r40059225
  
--- Diff: utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/nio/NioConnection.java ---
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ public void start() throws NioConnectionException {
 init();
 } catch (final ConnectException e) {
 s_logger.warn("Unable to connect to remote: is there a server 
running on port " + _port);
+return;
--- End diff --

Shouldn't we return on all Exceptions or just on this one?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8895: Verify if storage on sto...

[pritisarap12]

Github user pritisarap12 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/869#issuecomment-142205006
  
Test case result:

Attach Data Disk on CWPS To VM ... === TestName: 
test_01_attach_datadisk_to_vm_on_zwps | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 1 test in 188.574s

OK



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Configured dnsmasq to listen on all inter...

[jayapalu]

GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/870

Configured dnsmasq to listen on all interfaces so that vpn  client gets dns

1. Dnsmasq is not listening on the ppp+ interfaces due to this remote 
access vpn clients dns requests are  dropped.

2. Configured the dnsmasq to listen on all the interfaces except public. 
There is firewall to allow only specific cidr to allow the dns requests.

Tested from windows client nslookup.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/jayapalu/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-8874

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/870.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #870


commit dbedfe2557839332c394c44deb6c376f386681d9
Author: Jayapal 
Date:   2015-09-17T06:04:27Z

Configured dnsmasq to listen on all interfaces so that vpn  client gets dns




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.6][BLOCKER]CLOUDSTACK-8883: Resolved c...

[borisroman]

Github user borisroman commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/863#discussion_r40061561
  
--- Diff: utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/nio/NioConnection.java ---
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ public void start() throws NioConnectionException {
 init();
 } catch (final ConnectException e) {
 s_logger.warn("Unable to connect to remote: is there a server 
running on port " + _port);
+return;
--- End diff --

The others throw checked exceptions which are caught upstream.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

[jayapalu]

GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872

Strongswan vpn feature

This features is replacing the openswan ipsec with strongswan ipsec.
There are template changes for this features and changes are included in 
this PR as well.

1. Tested the s2s vpn functionality using the strongswan
2. Tested the remote access vpn functionality.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/jayapalu/cloudstack strongswanvpn

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #872


commit 6ce915359933d9c592fa031bf45092d044a04ed1
Author: Jayapal 
Date:   2015-08-05T08:36:05Z

CLOUDSTACK-8682: Strongswan site2site vpn changes
Added implementation of site2site vpn

commit bb75210a15abde533568f4ad4e05728926ded2f8
Author: Jayapal 
Date:   2015-08-12T05:59:35Z

CLOUDSTACK-8682: Removed openswan apackage installation for template

commit 2a64b32d036cbfc9db0fbe3f0460a5d79c26d86b
Author: Jayapal 
Date:   2015-08-25T05:14:24Z

CLOUDSTACK-8682: updated strongswan installation

commit ed00f720abb79434a0b890a74170576f934f8d19
Author: Jayapal 
Date:   2015-09-02T10:00:27Z

CLOUDSTACK-8682: Updated the strongswan initial config files

commit 3e64221cc2ecab926148e02ea11a710b7c6fb3d1
Author: Jayapal 
Date:   2015-09-02T12:20:08Z

CLOUDSTACK-8682: Updated the remote access vpn configuration for strongswan




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Configured dnsmasq to listen on all inter...

[terbolous]

Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/870#issuecomment-142232541
  
Tested by implementing the fix manually and testing DNS over VPC RA VPN. 
Works as expected.

LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

BVT report 9/22

[Raja Pullela]

Unfortunately, I had an issue with the automation code this morning- fixed the 
same and rerunning the BVTs.  I hope to post an update later in the day.  Sorry 
for the delay!

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8826: XenServer - Use device i...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/792


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

RE: Proposal to get to 100% passrate on BVTs

[Raja Pullela]

Bharat,  can you please repost if there is any specific ask ?  

Thanks,
Raja 
-Original Message-
From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:03 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal to get to 100% passrate on BVTs

Hi, 

I am already working towards this. We can already replicate the test infra 
using puppet. But i need some help in generating reports, sharing the test 
results and archiving them.
particularly archiving them since we need some space which is accessible by 
everyone.

I have also made a proposal to do this in the acs, It did not get much 
attention though. 

Thanks,
Bharat.


On 22-Sep-2015, at 9:43 am, Sanjeev N  wrote:

> I would be happy to lend my hand in generalizing the BVT Infra.
> 
> -Sanjeev
> 
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Raja Pullela 
> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Rohit, not sure about the efforts required to do this.  Can certainly 
>> work with you or someone to do this.  Please let me know,
>> 
>> best,
>> Raja
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 2:53 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Proposal to get to 100% passrate on BVTs
>> 
>> Great initiative Raja!
>> 
>> Any effort in generalizing the BVT infra so the infra can be 
>> reproduced using Puppet/Ansible?
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>> 
>> 
>> [cid:9DD97B41-04C5-45F0-92A7-951F3E962F7A]
>> 
>> 
>> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related 
>> services
>> 
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
>> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build/>
>> CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment 
>> framework
>> CloudStack Consulting
>> CloudStack Software Engineering<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses< 
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>> 
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are 
>> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is 
>> addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the 
>> author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or 
>> related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
>> email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor 
>> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe 
>> you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
>> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from 
>> Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
>> incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>> Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South 
>> Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a 
>> registered trademark.
>> 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8826: XenServer - Use device i...

[koushik-das]

Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/792#issuecomment-142236155
  
Merging as 2 LGTMs.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Strongswan vpn feature

[terbolous]

Github user terbolous commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#discussion_r40074130
  
--- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/vpn/etc/ipsec.d/l2tp.conf ---
@@ -30,4 +33,6 @@ conn L2TP-PSK
 # --
 # Change 'ignore' to 'add' to enable this configuration.
 #
+
+rightsubnetwithin=10.1.2.0/8
--- End diff --

Is the hard coding of rightsubnetwithin being reconfigured later to match 
the configured value?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8896: allocated percentage of ...

[karuturi]

GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873

CLOUDSTACK-8896: allocated percentage of storage pool going beyond 100%

This issue occurs when a volume in Ready state is moved across storage
pools.

While finding if the storage pool has enough space, it has a check to
consider the size of non Ready volumes only. This is true if the volume
to be attached to a vm is in the same storage pool. But, if the volume
is in another storage pool and has to be moved to a vm's storage pool,
the size of the volume should be considered in doing the space check.

computing the asking size when volume is not in ready state or when the 
volume is on a different storage pool.

Testing:
I couldnt write unittests for it. This class is not in a unittestable state.

manually tested in the below environment
1. xenserver 6.5 setup with 2 clusters and a host each in each of them.
2. added storage tags for the primary storage.
3. created two service offerings with the storage tags.
4. deployed two vms using newly created offerings in step 3.
5. at this stage, there are two vms one on each host with root disks on the 
corresponding primary.
6. create a data disk and attach it to vm1
7. detach the data disk. now the data disk is in the primary storage of the 
cluster of vm1 (let us say primary1)
8. attach this data disk to vm2(running on a host in different cluster)
9. the volume should be moved to the primary storage of another cluster and 
op_host_capacity should be accordingly updated.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/karuturi/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-8896

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #873


commit 5d8fd6e9acdc6b28d6a14b092290483614f412b3
Author: Rajani Karuturi 
Date:   2015-09-22T09:27:38Z

CLOUDSTACK-8896: allocated percentage of storage pool going beyond 100%

This issue occurs when a volume in Ready state is moved across storage
pools.

While finding if the storage pool has enough space, it has a check to
consider the size of non Ready volumes only. This is true if the volume
to be attached to a vm is in the same storage pool. But, if the volume
is in another storage pool and has to be moved to a vm's storage pool,
the size of the volume should be considered in doing the space check.

setting the asking size when volume is not in ready state or when on a
different storage pool.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [Automation]Volume migration between pool...

[nitt10prashant]

Github user nitt10prashant closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/742


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Proposal to get to 100% passrate on BVTs

[Bharat Kumar]

Hi,

I am sharing the link to the FS, it is not completely solid yet, but i intend 
to add more details as we progress further. Please go through this and let me 
know if someone wants to
help me on this. As i said earlier i want some help in generating, publishing 
and archiving the test results.

The link to the FS 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Test+bed+orchestrator+and+test+runner+to+enable+continuos+integration.


Thanks,
Bharat.


On 22-Sep-2015, at 3:35 pm, Raja Pullela 
> wrote:

Bharat,  can you please repost if there is any specific ask ?

Thanks,
Raja
-Original Message-
From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:03 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal to get to 100% passrate on BVTs

Hi,

I am already working towards this. We can already replicate the test infra 
using puppet. But i need some help in generating reports, sharing the test 
results and archiving them.
particularly archiving them since we need some space which is accessible by 
everyone.

I have also made a proposal to do this in the acs, It did not get much 
attention though.

Thanks,
Bharat.


On 22-Sep-2015, at 9:43 am, Sanjeev N 
> wrote:

I would be happy to lend my hand in generalizing the BVT Infra.

-Sanjeev

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Raja Pullela
>
wrote:

Rohit, not sure about the efforts required to do this.  Can certainly
work with you or someone to do this.  Please let me know,

best,
Raja
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 2:53 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal to get to 100% passrate on BVTs

Great initiative Raja!

Any effort in generalizing the BVT infra so the infra can be
reproduced using Puppet/Ansible?
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue


[cid:9DD97B41-04C5-45F0-92A7-951F3E962F7A]


M. +91 88 262 30892 | 
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: 
@_bhaisaab





Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build/>
CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment
framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software Engineering<
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or
related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor
copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe
you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
company incorporated in India and is operated under license from
Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South 
Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a 
registered trademark.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8897: baremetal:addHost:make h...

[harikrishna-patnala]

GitHub user harikrishna-patnala opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/874

CLOUDSTACK-8897: baremetal:addHost:make host tag info mandtory in bar…

CLOUDSTACK-8897: baremetal:addHost:make host tag info mandtory in baremetal 
addhost Api call

addhost api is successful with out providing the host tag info and we 
recommend host tag is mandatory for bare-metal.
In the current implementation host tag check is happening at vm deployment 
stage but it will be good to have host tag field as mandatory field during 
adding of the host 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/harikrishna-patnala/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-8897

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/874.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #874


commit 88f023cee3f2a52c3d1f6452cac84aa03477a2f1
Author: Harikrishna Patnala 
Date:   2015-09-22T11:41:16Z

CLOUDSTACK-8897: baremetal:addHost:make host tag info mandtory in baremetal 
addhost Api call

addhost api is successful with out providing the host tag info and we 
recommend host tag is mandatory for bare-metal.
In the current implementation host tag check is happening at vm deployment 
stage but it will be good to have host tag field as mandatory field during 
adding of the host it self.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8893: Fixing script as per the...

[sanju1010]

Github user sanju1010 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/871#issuecomment-142271544
  
@Desc: Test that Volume snapshot for root volume not allowed ... === 
TestName: test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 1 test in 165.417s

OK


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---