Re: Secondary VM https download certificate error

[Rajani Karuturi]

Do you see any error in the apache access logs on SSVM?

Check if the certs are uploaded properly at the below locations
/etc/ssl/private/cert_apache.key
/etc/ssl/certs/cert_apache.crt
/etc/ssl/certs/cert_apache_chain.crt

Also check the SSL configuration at
/etc/apache2/sites-available/default-ssl on SSVM.

When you destroy or reboot SSVM, check the setup command logs for
any configuration errors.

~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 17, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Marty Godsey
(ma...@gonsource.com) wrote:
Hello,

I have updated my SSVMs to use SSL for traffic. I have uploaded
my cert and almost everything works as intended. The console
proxy works without issue. If I go to an instance and click view
console, I am not prompted for an invalid certificate. However,
if I go to templates and click download template, I get a
properly formatted url:

https://ip.ip.ip.ip.mydomain.com/userdata/*

but the certificate is signed by systemvm which causes the
browser to complain. I followed the documentation as written. I
updated:

secstorage.encrypt.copy = true
secstorage.ssl.cert.domain = *.mydomain.com
consoleproxy.url.domain = *.mydomain.com

I also uploaded the cert and it was successful. I am confident
everything is set from the cert side since the proxy works. I
have rebooted the secondary storage vm numerous times and also
destroyed it so it was recreated.

My ACS version is 4.9.

Regards,
Marty Godsey

Re: AJAX video stream for VM console is broken in Chrome

[Sergey Levitskiy]

Yes, latest Chrome. No errors in console cloud.log. A parallel request from the 
same client using Firefox, Safari or IE works. It is obviously Chrome related 
but I am wondering if it is due to a way how Cloudstack sends video stream. 
Other sites seem to be OK in this regard accessed by Chrome from the same 
client.

On 8/17/16, 10:05 PM, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:

It can be browser specific. In the past, similar issues were
reported on IE8/9. Is it the latest chrome version?

It may be performace/bandwidth related. Do you see this when
there are more consoles open?
Do you see any errors in cloud.log on console proxy vm?

~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 18, 2016 at 2:16 AM, Sergey Levitskiy
(sergey.levits...@autodesk.com) wrote:
The screenshot is here:
https://autodesk.box.com/s/ry9xe5ugt8h9f3b9sr0ddv4qnsp9v8d8

From: Sergey Levitskiy 
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 1:42 PM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Subject: AJAX video stream for VM console is broken in Chrome

Has anyone observed issues in using Chrome for VM console
sessions? Since recently we have had reports from many but not
all users seeing white blank space where VM screen output goes.
Other parts of the window e.g. Ctrl-Alt-Del button works just
fine so it seems that AJAX stream is broken in Chrome although no
other sites were reported with the same issues.
I attached a screenshot of console window. Has anyone seen this
issue or knows if there is a workaround except using a different
browser?

Re: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master

[Rajani Karuturi]

Any errors in the SSVM logs?

~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 18, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:
I should have pointed out that this is a Basic Zone. Also, there
is only one KVM host in my one cluster.

From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 5:03 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master

Hi,

I am trying to build a cloud making use of KVM system VMs.

My SSVM VM comes up, but its agent doesn't seem to:

http://imgur.com/a/Fo2ax

Thoughts on what might be going on here?

Thanks!

Mike

Re: AJAX video stream for VM console is broken in Chrome

[Rajani Karuturi]

It can be browser specific. In the past, similar issues were
reported on IE8/9. Is it the latest chrome version?

It may be performace/bandwidth related. Do you see this when
there are more consoles open?
Do you see any errors in cloud.log on console proxy vm?

~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On August 18, 2016 at 2:16 AM, Sergey Levitskiy
(sergey.levits...@autodesk.com) wrote:
The screenshot is here:
https://autodesk.box.com/s/ry9xe5ugt8h9f3b9sr0ddv4qnsp9v8d8

From: Sergey Levitskiy 
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 1:42 PM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Subject: AJAX video stream for VM console is broken in Chrome

Has anyone observed issues in using Chrome for VM console
sessions? Since recently we have had reports from many but not
all users seeing white blank space where VM screen output goes.
Other parts of the window e.g. Ctrl-Alt-Del button works just
fine so it seems that AJAX stream is broken in Chrome although no
other sites were reported with the same issues.
I attached a screenshot of console window. Has anyone seen this
issue or knows if there is a workaround except using a different
browser?

Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

[Sally Khudairi]

Hi everyone --we received the following testimonial from Emil at Codero. Thank 
you, Emil!

“At Codero, we have been running our Public Cloud flawlessly on CloudStack 
since 2012 having selected it to power our Public and Hybrid Cloud due to its 
amazing stability, ease of use, and versatility," said Emil Sayegh, CEO and 
Chairman of Codero Hosting.  "We are excited for the release of the next 
version of Apache CloudStack with its new features and capabilities that cement 
it as the Open Source platform of choice for leading hosting providers”. 
Regards,
Sally

[From the mobile; please excuse top-posting, spelling/spacing errors, and 
brevity]

- Reply message -
From: "Sally Khudairi" 
To: "Giles Sirett" , 
"market...@cloudstack.apache.org" , 
"dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Subject: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release
Date: Wed, Aug 17, 2016 12:15

Thank you, Giles.


Also, re: "v4.9" vs. "4.9", the ASF House Style is to write it as "v4.9" in the 
heading of a press release and refer to it as "4.9" elsewhere.


This is similar to our need to reference "CloudStack" as its full name, "Apache 
CloudStack" in its initial mention (press release, Website, etc.). This is a 
Trademarks/Brand Management thing, but still relevant.


To that end, I will be going through the final draft of the press release and 
ensuring that we're in synch with respect to House Style, trademarks notice, 
etc., before going live.


Of course, any proposed editorial changes will be forwarded to you before 
anything happens on that front.


As always, feel free to let me know if you need anything!


Kind thanks,
Sally


= = = = =  vox +1 617 921 8656
gvox +1 646 598 4616
skype sallykhudairi


From: Giles Sirett 
To: Sally Khudairi ; "market...@cloudstack.apache.org" 
; "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 12:10 PM
Subject: RE: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release




Sally

All noted. I’m asking some folks for a quote – will come back to you




Kind Regards

Giles





giles.sir...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
@shapeblue







From: Sally Khudairi [mailto:s...@apache.org]

Sent: 17 August 2016 17:07
To: market...@cloudstack.apache.org; Giles Sirett ; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sally Khudairi 
Subject: Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release









Hello again, everyone --I want to reiterate that it would be a very good idea 
for us (= the Project) to solicit at few testimonials from
the Apache CloudStack user community.









One thing that we tout is that CloudStack "just works". It would be unusual for 
us to make a formal announcement regarding a major release
and not have any testimonials.









As the ASF's VP Marketing & Publicity, I can attest that we have only had one 
such announcement, which was received by the media/analyst
community with curiosity (to put it politely) ... "why won't anyone own up to 
using your product?" is not something I'd like us to have to deal with, 
particularly as that's not the case.









To that end, I will be happy to help work with you on this front, and strongly 
recommend that we consider holding off on issuing the
press release until we have secured some user quotes.









Should we choose to do this, and if we can secure the quotes by Sunday evening, 
I can issue the announcement as early as 4AM ET on Monday
22 August. Yes, I'll be sleepy, but it's worth it 









Thoughts?









Warmly,
Sally









= = = = = 



vox +1 617 921 8656




gvox +1 646 598 4616




skype sallykhudairi



















From: Sally Khudairi 
To: Giles Sirett ; 
"market...@cloudstack.apache.org" ;
"dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 

Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release










Thanks, Giles.









OK. Normally, we don't cross-collaborate on marketing/PR issues with public 
lists, but we can't unstrike the bell at this point.









I'll await your clearance.









-Sally









= = = = = 



vox +1 617 921 8656




gvox +1 646 598 4616




skype sallykhudairi




















From: Giles Sirett 
To: "market...@cloudstack.apache.org" ; 
"dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
 
Cc: Sally Khudairi 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 9:11 AM
Subject: RE: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release










Sally









I’m cross posting this to dev@ - we’ve not had much input on marketing@, so I’d 
like some other eyeballs on this if we’re going to
turn it around today









I agree, we need to get this finalised ASAP









My view 

RE: Hiding buttons based on role

[Will Stevens]

Right. By one off, I mean, I don't expect the entire community to adopt
this approach.

The one thing to pay attention to with this approach is that every time you
change a roles permissions, you have to adapt and redeploy the CSS to
reflect the permission change. I don't remember if you have to rebuild to
pick up a new CSS file (I sure hope not).  You could put the css in an
object store (like s3) and reference it in ACS, then update the CORS
settings to 'allow origin X' and serve it from a central location. This way
if you have multiple installs of ACS that will have the same permissions
you can update the visibility on all in a single place.

How you want to manage it will depend on how you are configuring and
managing your ACS setups, but you the idea.

On Aug 17, 2016 8:34 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:

> Not elegant but will work. This is not a one off to a degree. It's for my
> own servers but I will have at least 10-20 management server across the
> country in different zones  but this allows me to "hide" some elements that
> won't be used until a more elegant way is created/available.
>
> Thank you for the direction Will.
>
> Regards,
> Marty Godsey
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 8:29 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Hiding buttons based on role
>
> If I was doing a one off solution for my own use case with a limited
> scope, I would do it he following.
>
> Apply a CSS class to the  tag which corresponds to the role. Then I
> would use CSS to 'display:none' on the elements you want to turn off by
> referencing the body role class (and keep the permissions applied so if
> they unhide it won't work).
>
> It is not an elegant solution, but it will work.
>
> On Aug 17, 2016 8:19 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Ok. Thank you.
> >
> > I think for the time being I will enable all the project APIs again
> > but
> deny access to create a project.. this way at least he API errors on page
> load go away.
> >
> > This is something I think would be nice to have in the permissions
> > area
> now since we have granular rules. A way to "turn off" certain areas of the
> GUI and/or ACS functionality.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marty Godsey
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 8:10 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Hiding buttons based on role
> >
> > Yes. Most of the UI is built using huge json structures. These will
> > need
> to be adapted to account for a user's role. I don't think there has been
> work done on that yet, but I could be wrong.
> >
> > @rohit, do you know if anyone has looked into this at all yet?
> >
> > On Aug 17, 2016 7:41 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:
> >
> > > With that being said, we are now getting into the area of UI
> > > modification to hide the button huh?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Marty Godsey
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 7:23 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Hiding buttons based on role
> > >
> > > My understanding is that the permissions can be set, but they
> > > currently do not modify the UI in any way. I believe what you are
> > > experiencing is the expected behavior.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Will
> > >
> > > On Aug 17, 2016 6:47 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is it possible to hide a button based upon a role? As an example I
> > > > want to hide and deny access to the projects tab. I can modify the
> > > > role access to the API but the button is still present. In fact I
> > > > get an API error that states I don't have access.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Marty Godsey
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>

RE: Hiding buttons based on role

[Marty Godsey]

Not elegant but will work. This is not a one off to a degree. It's for my own 
servers but I will have at least 10-20 management server across the country in 
different zones  but this allows me to "hide" some elements that won't be used 
until a more elegant way is created/available.

Thank you for the direction Will.

Regards,
Marty Godsey

-Original Message-
From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 8:29 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Hiding buttons based on role

If I was doing a one off solution for my own use case with a limited scope, I 
would do it he following.

Apply a CSS class to the  tag which corresponds to the role. Then I would 
use CSS to 'display:none' on the elements you want to turn off by referencing 
the body role class (and keep the permissions applied so if they unhide it 
won't work).

It is not an elegant solution, but it will work.

On Aug 17, 2016 8:19 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:

>

> Ok. Thank you.
>
> I think for the time being I will enable all the project APIs again 
> but
deny access to create a project.. this way at least he API errors on page load 
go away.
>
> This is something I think would be nice to have in the permissions 
> area
now since we have granular rules. A way to "turn off" certain areas of the GUI 
and/or ACS functionality.
>
> Regards,
> Marty Godsey
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 8:10 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Hiding buttons based on role
>
> Yes. Most of the UI is built using huge json structures. These will 
> need
to be adapted to account for a user's role. I don't think there has been work 
done on that yet, but I could be wrong.
>
> @rohit, do you know if anyone has looked into this at all yet?
>
> On Aug 17, 2016 7:41 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:
>
> > With that being said, we are now getting into the area of UI 
> > modification to hide the button huh?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marty Godsey
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 7:23 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Hiding buttons based on role
> >
> > My understanding is that the permissions can be set, but they 
> > currently do not modify the UI in any way. I believe what you are 
> > experiencing is the expected behavior.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Will
> >
> > On Aug 17, 2016 6:47 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:
> >
> > > Is it possible to hide a button based upon a role? As an example I 
> > > want to hide and deny access to the projects tab. I can modify the 
> > > role access to the API but the button is still present. In fact I 
> > > get an API error that states I don't have access.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Marty Godsey
> > >
> > >
> >

RE: Hiding buttons based on role

[Will Stevens]

If I was doing a one off solution for my own use case with a limited scope,
I would do it he following.

Apply a CSS class to the  tag which corresponds to the role. Then I
would use CSS to 'display:none' on the elements you want to turn off by
referencing the body role class (and keep the permissions applied so if
they unhide it won't work).

It is not an elegant solution, but it will work.

On Aug 17, 2016 8:19 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:

>

> Ok. Thank you.
>
> I think for the time being I will enable all the project APIs again but
deny access to create a project.. this way at least he API errors on page
load go away.
>
> This is something I think would be nice to have in the permissions area
now since we have granular rules. A way to "turn off" certain areas of the
GUI and/or ACS functionality.
>
> Regards,
> Marty Godsey
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 8:10 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Hiding buttons based on role
>
> Yes. Most of the UI is built using huge json structures. These will need
to be adapted to account for a user's role. I don't think there has been
work done on that yet, but I could be wrong.
>
> @rohit, do you know if anyone has looked into this at all yet?
>
> On Aug 17, 2016 7:41 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:
>
> > With that being said, we are now getting into the area of UI
> > modification to hide the button huh?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marty Godsey
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 7:23 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Hiding buttons based on role
> >
> > My understanding is that the permissions can be set, but they
> > currently do not modify the UI in any way. I believe what you are
> > experiencing is the expected behavior.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Will
> >
> > On Aug 17, 2016 6:47 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:
> >
> > > Is it possible to hide a button based upon a role? As an example I
> > > want to hide and deny access to the projects tab. I can modify the
> > > role access to the API but the button is still present. In fact I
> > > get an API error that states I don't have access.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Marty Godsey
> > >
> > >
> >

RE: Hiding buttons based on role

[Marty Godsey]

Ok. Thank you.

I think for the time being I will enable all the project APIs again but deny 
access to create a project.. this way at least he API errors on page load go 
away.

This is something I think would be nice to have in the permissions area now 
since we have granular rules. A way to "turn off" certain areas of the GUI 
and/or ACS functionality.

Regards,
Marty Godsey

-Original Message-
From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 8:10 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Hiding buttons based on role

Yes. Most of the UI is built using huge json structures. These will need to be 
adapted to account for a user's role. I don't think there has been work done on 
that yet, but I could be wrong.

@rohit, do you know if anyone has looked into this at all yet?

On Aug 17, 2016 7:41 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:

> With that being said, we are now getting into the area of UI 
> modification to hide the button huh?
>
> Regards,
> Marty Godsey
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 7:23 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Hiding buttons based on role
>
> My understanding is that the permissions can be set, but they 
> currently do not modify the UI in any way. I believe what you are 
> experiencing is the expected behavior.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Will
>
> On Aug 17, 2016 6:47 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to hide a button based upon a role? As an example I 
> > want to hide and deny access to the projects tab. I can modify the 
> > role access to the API but the button is still present. In fact I 
> > get an API error that states I don't have access.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marty Godsey
> >
> >
>

RE: Hiding buttons based on role

[Will Stevens]

Yes. Most of the UI is built using huge json structures. These will need to
be adapted to account for a user's role. I don't think there has been work
done on that yet, but I could be wrong.

@rohit, do you know if anyone has looked into this at all yet?

On Aug 17, 2016 7:41 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:

> With that being said, we are now getting into the area of UI modification
> to hide the button huh?
>
> Regards,
> Marty Godsey
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 7:23 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Hiding buttons based on role
>
> My understanding is that the permissions can be set, but they currently do
> not modify the UI in any way. I believe what you are experiencing is the
> expected behavior.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Will
>
> On Aug 17, 2016 6:47 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to hide a button based upon a role? As an example I
> > want to hide and deny access to the projects tab. I can modify the
> > role access to the API but the button is still present. In fact I get
> > an API error that states I don't have access.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marty Godsey
> >
> >
>

RE: Hiding buttons based on role

[Marty Godsey]

With that being said, we are now getting into the area of UI modification to 
hide the button huh?

Regards,
Marty Godsey

-Original Message-
From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 7:23 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hiding buttons based on role

My understanding is that the permissions can be set, but they currently do not 
modify the UI in any way. I believe what you are experiencing is the expected 
behavior.

Cheers,

Will

On Aug 17, 2016 6:47 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:

> Is it possible to hide a button based upon a role? As an example I 
> want to hide and deny access to the projects tab. I can modify the 
> role access to the API but the button is still present. In fact I get 
> an API error that states I don't have access.
>
> Regards,
> Marty Godsey
>
>

Re: Hiding buttons based on role

[Will Stevens]

My understanding is that the permissions can be set, but they currently do
not modify the UI in any way. I believe what you are experiencing is the
expected behavior.

Cheers,

Will

On Aug 17, 2016 6:47 PM, "Marty Godsey"  wrote:

> Is it possible to hide a button based upon a role? As an example I want to
> hide and deny access to the projects tab. I can modify the role access to
> the API but the button is still present. In fact I get an API error that
> states I don't have access.
>
> Regards,
> Marty Godsey
>
>

Re: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master

[Tutkowski, Mike]

I should have pointed out that this is a Basic Zone. Also, there is only one 
KVM host in my one cluster.

From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 5:03 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Issue with SSVM on KVM on master

Hi,


I am trying to build a cloud making use of KVM system VMs.


My SSVM VM comes up, but its agent doesn't seem to:


http://imgur.com/a/Fo2ax


Thoughts on what might be going on here?


Thanks!

Mike

Issue with SSVM on KVM on master

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Hi,


I am trying to build a cloud making use of KVM system VMs.


My SSVM VM comes up, but its agent doesn't seem to:


http://imgur.com/a/Fo2ax


Thoughts on what might be going on here?


Thanks!

Mike

Hiding buttons based on role

[Marty Godsey]

Is it possible to hide a button based upon a role? As an example I want to hide 
and deny access to the projects tab. I can modify the role access to the API 
but the button is still present. In fact I get an API error that states I don't 
have access.

Regards,
Marty Godsey

Re: UnsatisfiedLink Error

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Just in case anyone else encounters this problem, I solved it this way:

sudo apt-get autoremove libjna-java


From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:42 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: UnsatisfiedLink Error

Hi everyone,


Does anyone know how I can circumvent this error when running dpkg-buildpackage 
-uc -us (I'm building with master on Ubuntu 14.04):


LibvirtComputingResourceTest.testMemoryFreeInKBsDomainReturningOfSomeMemoryStatistics:5045->createMemoryStatisticFreeMemory100:5063
 » UnsatisfiedLink


To get around problems when building with MVN, I had to add -Djna.nosys=true.


Thanks!

Mike

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1645: This converts the rbd raw format on disk to qcow2 fo...

[nathanejohnson]

Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
  
```
before:

[njohnson@csm01.nsvltn secondary]$ ls -lh 
snapshots/102/5022/a6baaf14-190a-4a06-b95a-5b502fbd7d06
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40G Aug 17 16:41 
snapshots/102/5022/a6baaf14-190a-4a06-b95a-5b502fbd7d06
[njohnson@csm01.nsvltn secondary]$ file 
snapshots/102/5022/a6baaf14-190a-4a06-b95a-5b502fbd7d06
snapshots/102/5022/a6baaf14-190a-4a06-b95a-5b502fbd7d06: x86 boot sector; 
partition 1: ID=0x7, active, starthead 32, startsector 2048, 716800 sectors; 
partition 2: ID=0x7, starthead 190, startsector 718848, 83165184 sectors, code 
offset 0xc0, OEM-ID "  м", Bytes/sector 190, sectors/cluster 124, reserved 
sectors 191, FATs 6, root entries 185, sectors 64514 (volumes <=32 MB) , Media 
descriptor 0xf3, sectors/FAT 20644, heads 6, hidden sectors 309755, sectors 
2147991229 (volumes > 32 MB) , physical drive 0x7e, dos < 4.0 BootSector (0x0)
[njohnson@csm01.nsvltn secondary]$

after:

[njohn...@dkrlab01.dev secondary]$ file 
snapshots/10/215/6c191b18-32fe-4ff3-b6e0-b1a216c3bdfd
snapshots/10/215/6c191b18-32fe-4ff3-b6e0-b1a216c3bdfd: QEMU QCOW Image 
(v3), 21474836480 bytes
[njohn...@dkrlab01.dev secondary]$ ls -lh 
snapshots/10/215/6c191b18-32fe-4ff3-b6e0-b1a216c3bdfd
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 193K Aug 17 16:10 
snapshots/10/215/6c191b18-32fe-4ff3-b6e0-b1a216c3bdfd
[njohn...@dkrlab01.dev secondary]$ 
```


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1645: This converts the rbd raw format on disk to qcow2 fo...

[nathanejohnson]

Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
  
On KVM where primary storage is ceph / rbd, and a snapshot is backed up to 
secondary, the comments seem to indicate that in this scenario the image will 
be converted to qcow2 to save space.  In implementation, however, it actually 
"converts" the source format (RAW in this case) into  RAW, which is effectly a 
straight copy.  This means that for a 20GB volume that is mostly empty, it will 
copy a full 20GB file onto secondary storage as a backup.  I have changed this 
to it always sets the source type to that of the disk (which should always be 
RAW for RBD), and sets the dest disk type to QCOW2.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1644: Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafter configuration ...

[nathanejohnson]

Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1644
  
Here is a snippet of the logs with storage.snapshot.backup.rightafter set 
to false.

```2016-08-17 15:34:38,530 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] 
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-b9fb719f) (logid:389a008f) ===START===  10.16.0.21 -- GET 
 
command=createSnapshot=json=c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85
=false=testsnap&_=1471466078445
2016-08-17 15:34:39,907 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-b9fb719f ctx-d879986a) (logid:389a008f) submit async 
job-2361, details: AsyncJobVO {id:2361, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instance
Type: Snapshot, instanceId: 21, cmd: 
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.snapshot.CreateSnapshotCmd, cmdInfo: 
{"id":"21","response":"json","ctxDetails":"{\"interface 
com.cloud.storage.Volume\":\"c02b4f35-aed4-
4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85\",\"interface 
com.cloud.storage.Snapshot\":\"db19bec0-60e0-497b-879e-08ee89c3266a\"}","cmdEventType":"SNAPSHOT.CREATE","ctxUserId":"2","volumeId":"c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85","nam

e":"testsnap","httpmethod":"GET","quiescevm":"false","_":"1471466078445","uuid":"db19bec0-60e0-497b-879e-08ee89c3266a","ctxAccountId":"2","ctxStartEventId":"5444"},
 cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStat
us: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 52239507206, completeMsid: 
null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null}
2016-08-17 15:34:39,908 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361) (logid:abb822e7) Add job-2361 into 
job monitoring
2016-08-17 15:34:39,911 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361) (logid:b56de38a) Executing 
AsyncJobVO {id:2361, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType: Snapshot, instanc
eId: 21, cmd: 
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.snapshot.CreateSnapshotCmd, cmdInfo: 
{"id":"21","response":"json","ctxDetails":"{\"interface 
com.cloud.storage.Volume\":\"c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85\
",\"interface 
com.cloud.storage.Snapshot\":\"db19bec0-60e0-497b-879e-08ee89c3266a\"}","cmdEventType":"SNAPSHOT.CREATE","ctxUserId":"2","volumeId":"c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85","name":"testsnap","httpmeth

od":"GET","quiescevm":"false","_":"1471466078445","uuid":"db19bec0-60e0-497b-879e-08ee89c3266a","ctxAccountId":"2","ctxStartEventId":"5444"},
 cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, r
esult: null, initMsid: 52239507206, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, 
lastPolled: null, created: null}
2016-08-17 15:34:39,919 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] 
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-b9fb719f ctx-d879986a) (logid:389a008f) ===END===  
10.16.0.21 -- GET  
command=createSnapshot=json=c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b
5c36615fa85=false=testsnap&_=1471466078445
2016-08-17 15:34:39,922 INFO  [o.a.c.a.c.u.s.CreateSnapshotCmd] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361 ctx-1d14d077) (logid:b56de38a) 
VOLSS: createSnapshotCmd starts:1471466079922
2016-08-17 15:34:39,976 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.d.ObjectInDataStoreManagerImpl] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361 ctx-1d14d077) (logid:b56de38a) find 
inconsistent db for snapshot 20
2016-08-17 15:34:40,017 DEBUG [c.c.h.o.r.Ovm3HypervisorGuru] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361 ctx-1d14d077) (logid:b56de38a) 
getCommandHostDelegation: class org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CreateO
bjectCommand
2016-08-17 15:34:40,017 DEBUG [c.c.h.XenServerGuru] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361 ctx-1d14d077) (logid:b56de38a) 
getCommandHostDelegation: class 
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CreateObjectComm
and
2016-08-17 15:34:40,019 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361 ctx-1d14d077) (logid:b56de38a) Seq 
1-4906671794020407360: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 52239507206, via: 
1(njcloudhost.dev.en
a.net), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, 
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CreateObjectCommand":{"data":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.SnapshotObjectTO":{"volume":{"uuid":"c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85",

"volumeType":"DATADISK","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"282d5a88-b298-39b9-bd65-aafb088270c2","id":3,"poolType":"RBD","host":"ceph-mon.labs.ena.net","path":"rbdnjcloudh

ost","port":6789,"url":"RBD://ceph-mon.labs.ena.net/rbdnjcloudhost/?ROLE=Primary=282d5a88-b298-39b9-bd65-aafb088270c2"}},"name":"","size":171798691840,"path":"c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85","

volumeId":187,"accountId":10,"format":"RAW","provisioningType":"THIN","id":187,"bytesReadRate":83886080,"bytesWriteRate":83886080,"iopsReadRate":80,"iopsWriteRate":80,"hypervisorType":"KVM"},"dataStore":{"org.apa

che.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"282d5a88-b298-39b9-bd65-aafb088270c2","id":3,"poolType":"RBD","host":"ceph-mon.labs.e

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1644: Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafter configuration ...

[nathanejohnson]

Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1644
  
`2016-08-17 15:34:38,530 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] 
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-b9fb719f) (logid:389a008f) ===START===  10.16.0.21 -- GET 
 
command=createSnapshot=json=c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85
=false=testsnap&_=1471466078445
2016-08-17 15:34:39,907 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-b9fb719f ctx-d879986a) (logid:389a008f) submit async 
job-2361, details: AsyncJobVO {id:2361, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instance
Type: Snapshot, instanceId: 21, cmd: 
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.snapshot.CreateSnapshotCmd, cmdInfo: 
{"id":"21","response":"json","ctxDetails":"{\"interface 
com.cloud.storage.Volume\":\"c02b4f35-aed4-
4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85\",\"interface 
com.cloud.storage.Snapshot\":\"db19bec0-60e0-497b-879e-08ee89c3266a\"}","cmdEventType":"SNAPSHOT.CREATE","ctxUserId":"2","volumeId":"c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85","nam

e":"testsnap","httpmethod":"GET","quiescevm":"false","_":"1471466078445","uuid":"db19bec0-60e0-497b-879e-08ee89c3266a","ctxAccountId":"2","ctxStartEventId":"5444"},
 cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStat
us: 0, resultCode: 0, result: null, initMsid: 52239507206, completeMsid: 
null, lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null}
2016-08-17 15:34:39,908 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361) (logid:abb822e7) Add job-2361 into 
job monitoring
2016-08-17 15:34:39,911 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361) (logid:b56de38a) Executing 
AsyncJobVO {id:2361, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType: Snapshot, instanc
eId: 21, cmd: 
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.snapshot.CreateSnapshotCmd, cmdInfo: 
{"id":"21","response":"json","ctxDetails":"{\"interface 
com.cloud.storage.Volume\":\"c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85\
",\"interface 
com.cloud.storage.Snapshot\":\"db19bec0-60e0-497b-879e-08ee89c3266a\"}","cmdEventType":"SNAPSHOT.CREATE","ctxUserId":"2","volumeId":"c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85","name":"testsnap","httpmeth

od":"GET","quiescevm":"false","_":"1471466078445","uuid":"db19bec0-60e0-497b-879e-08ee89c3266a","ctxAccountId":"2","ctxStartEventId":"5444"},
 cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, r
esult: null, initMsid: 52239507206, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, 
lastPolled: null, created: null}
2016-08-17 15:34:39,919 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] 
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-b9fb719f ctx-d879986a) (logid:389a008f) ===END===  
10.16.0.21 -- GET  
command=createSnapshot=json=c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b
5c36615fa85=false=testsnap&_=1471466078445
2016-08-17 15:34:39,922 INFO  [o.a.c.a.c.u.s.CreateSnapshotCmd] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361 ctx-1d14d077) (logid:b56de38a) 
VOLSS: createSnapshotCmd starts:1471466079922
2016-08-17 15:34:39,976 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.d.ObjectInDataStoreManagerImpl] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361 ctx-1d14d077) (logid:b56de38a) find 
inconsistent db for snapshot 20
2016-08-17 15:34:40,017 DEBUG [c.c.h.o.r.Ovm3HypervisorGuru] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361 ctx-1d14d077) (logid:b56de38a) 
getCommandHostDelegation: class org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CreateO
bjectCommand
2016-08-17 15:34:40,017 DEBUG [c.c.h.XenServerGuru] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361 ctx-1d14d077) (logid:b56de38a) 
getCommandHostDelegation: class 
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CreateObjectComm
and
2016-08-17 15:34:40,019 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
(API-Job-Executor-85:ctx-33ba3569 job-2361 ctx-1d14d077) (logid:b56de38a) Seq 
1-4906671794020407360: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 52239507206, via: 
1(njcloudhost.dev.en
a.net), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, 
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CreateObjectCommand":{"data":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.SnapshotObjectTO":{"volume":{"uuid":"c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85",

"volumeType":"DATADISK","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"282d5a88-b298-39b9-bd65-aafb088270c2","id":3,"poolType":"RBD","host":"ceph-mon.labs.ena.net","path":"rbdnjcloudh

ost","port":6789,"url":"RBD://ceph-mon.labs.ena.net/rbdnjcloudhost/?ROLE=Primary=282d5a88-b298-39b9-bd65-aafb088270c2"}},"name":"","size":171798691840,"path":"c02b4f35-aed4-4c23-bbc3-b5c36615fa85","

volumeId":187,"accountId":10,"format":"RAW","provisioningType":"THIN","id":187,"bytesReadRate":83886080,"bytesWriteRate":83886080,"iopsReadRate":80,"iopsWriteRate":80,"hypervisorType":"KVM"},"dataStore":{"org.apa

che.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"282d5a88-b298-39b9-bd65-aafb088270c2","id":3,"poolType":"RBD","host":"ceph-mon.labs.e

Re: AJAX video stream for VM console is broken in Chrome

[Sergey Levitskiy]

The screenshot is here:
https://autodesk.box.com/s/ry9xe5ugt8h9f3b9sr0ddv4qnsp9v8d8


From: Sergey Levitskiy 
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 1:42 PM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Subject: AJAX video stream for VM console is broken in Chrome

Has anyone observed issues in using Chrome for VM console sessions?  Since 
recently we have had reports from many but not all users seeing white blank 
space where VM screen output goes. Other parts of the window e.g. Ctrl-Alt-Del 
button works just fine so it seems that AJAX stream is broken in Chrome 
although no other sites were reported with the same issues.
I attached a screenshot of console window. Has anyone seen this issue or knows 
if there is a workaround except using a different browser?

AJAX video stream for VM console is broken in Chrome

[Sergey Levitskiy]

Has anyone observed issues in using Chrome for VM console sessions?  Since 
recently we have had reports from many but not all users seeing white blank 
space where VM screen output goes. Other parts of the window e.g. Ctrl-Alt-Del 
button works just fine so it seems that AJAX stream is broken in Chrome 
although no other sites were reported with the same issues.
I attached a screenshot of console window. Has anyone seen this issue or knows 
if there is a workaround except using a different browser?

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: System VMs on Managed Storage

[syed]

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@mike-tutkowski  the code LGTM. We have a managed storage in-house. I will 
run it there and report if I see any problems.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

UnsatisfiedLink Error

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Hi everyone,


Does anyone know how I can circumvent this error when running dpkg-buildpackage 
-uc -us (I'm building with master on Ubuntu 14.04):


LibvirtComputingResourceTest.testMemoryFreeInKBsDomainReturningOfSomeMemoryStatistics:5045->createMemoryStatisticFreeMemory100:5063
 » UnsatisfiedLink


To get around problems when building with MVN, I had to add -Djna.nosys=true.


Thanks!

Mike

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Thanks @rhtyd for the review!
I believe @syed will provide a review when he has time, as well.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

[Will Stevens]

I went through and fixed some grammatical items and made it read a little
easier.  Hopefully you are happy with my changes.

Cheers,

Will

-

[APACHE CLOUDSTACK LOGO]

Announcing Apache™ CloudStack™ v4.9

Mature, easy-to-deploy Open Source Cloud computing software which meets the
demands of the worlds largest cloud providers.

[DATELINE] -[date]- The Apache CloudStack project announced today the
immediate
availability of Apache CloudStack 4.9, the latest version of the turnkey
Open Source cloud
computing software platform used for creating private, public, and hybrid
cloud environments.

Apache CloudStack clouds enable billions of dollars' worth of business
transactions annually
across their clouds. Its maturity, stability and ease of deployment has led
it to become the Open Source
platform of choice for many service providers offering on-demand, elastic
public cloud computing services.
CloudStack is also leveraged by many enterprises to provide private or
hybrid clouds for use by their employees.

CloudStack includes an intuitive user interface and rich APIs for managing
the compute, networking, software, and storage infrastructure resources. It
supports a broad range of integration points for both traditional and
cloud-native workloads.

CloudStack 4.9 reflects dozens of new features and improvements, including:

- Out of band power management of hosts through IPMI, iLO, DRAC
- Enhancements to CloudStack networking model including deeper integration
with Nuage VSP SDN
- User defined security roles
- Over 180 minor enhancements and issues fixed

A complete overview of all new enhancements can be found in the project
release notes at
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.9.0/

CloudStack has been used by thousands of organizations worldwide and is in
use/production
at Alcatel-Lucent, Autodesk, BT Cloud, China Telecom, DataPipe, Exoscale,
Globo.com, GreenQloud,
Hokkaido University, IDC Frontier, Ikoula, Interoute, KDDI, KT/Korea
Telecom, LeaseWeb, NTT, Orange,
PCextreme, Schuberg Philis, Shopzilla, Slovak Telekom, Tata, Trader Media
Group, TomTom,
University of Melbourne, University of Sao Paolo, Verizon, WebMD and
cloud.ca among many others.
A list of known users of the software can be found at
http://cloudstack.apache.org/users.html

Will Stevens, VP of Apache CloudStack commented on the release: "we're
delighted to be releasing 4.9 of Apache CloudStack. This version brings
many new and exciting features, with the continued emphasis on making
Apache CloudStack the easiest cloud platform to deploy and most reliable
platform for running IaaS environments. This release is the culmination of
many months of hard work by our broad developer community."

Availability
CloudStack 4.9 is available immediately as a free download from
http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html.
Apache CloudStack software is released under the Apache License v2.0.

Governance and Oversight
Apache CloudStack is overseen by a self-selected team of active
contributors to the project.
A Project Management Committee (PMC) guides the Project's day-to-day
operations, including
community development and product releases.

Get Involved!
Apache CloudStack welcomes contribution and community participation through
mailing lists
as well as attending face-to-face MeetUps, developer trainings, and user
events.


About Apache CloudStack
Apache CloudStack is a mature, turnkey integrated
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) Open
Source software platform that allows users to build feature-rich public and
private cloud
environments. Hailed by Gartner Group as "a solid product", CloudStack
includes an intuitive
user interface and rich APIs for managing the compute, networking,
software, and storage infrastructure
resources. CloudStack entered the Apache Incubator in April 2012 and became
an Apache Top-level
Project in March 2013. For downloads, documentation, and ways to become
involved with Apache
CloudStack, visit http://cloudstack.apache.org/ and
https://twitter.com/CloudStack

-


On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Will Stevens 
wrote:

> Sorry, just saw this.  I will do a once through and get back to you...
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Sally Khudairi  wrote:
>
>> Thank you, Giles.
>>
>> Also, re: "v4.9" vs. "4.9", the ASF House Style is to write it as "v4.9"
>> in the heading of a press release and refer to it as "4.9" elsewhere.
>>
>> This is similar to our need to reference "CloudStack" as its full name,
>> "Apache CloudStack" in its initial mention (press release, Website, etc.).
>> This is a Trademarks/Brand Management thing, but still relevant.
>>
>> To that end, I will be going through the final draft of the press release
>> and ensuring that we're in synch with respect to House Style, trademarks
>> notice, etc., before going live.
>>
>> Of course, any proposed editorial changes will be forwarded to you before
>> anything happens on that front.
>>
>> 

Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

[Will Stevens]

Sorry, just saw this.  I will do a once through and get back to you...

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Sally Khudairi  wrote:

> Thank you, Giles.
>
> Also, re: "v4.9" vs. "4.9", the ASF House Style is to write it as "v4.9"
> in the heading of a press release and refer to it as "4.9" elsewhere.
>
> This is similar to our need to reference "CloudStack" as its full name,
> "Apache CloudStack" in its initial mention (press release, Website, etc.).
> This is a Trademarks/Brand Management thing, but still relevant.
>
> To that end, I will be going through the final draft of the press release
> and ensuring that we're in synch with respect to House Style, trademarks
> notice, etc., before going live.
>
> Of course, any proposed editorial changes will be forwarded to you before
> anything happens on that front.
>
> As always, feel free to let me know if you need anything!
>
> Kind thanks,
> Sally
>
> = = = = =
> vox +1 617 921 8656
> gvox +1 646 598 4616
> skype sallykhudairi
>
>
> --
> *From:* Giles Sirett 
> *To:* Sally Khudairi ; "market...@cloudstack.apache.org" <
> market...@cloudstack.apache.org>; "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 17, 2016 12:10 PM
>
> *Subject:* RE: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release
>
> Sally
> All noted. I’m asking some folks for a quote – will come back to you
>
> Kind Regards
> Giles
>
> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> @shapeblue
>
>
> *From:* Sally Khudairi [mailto:s...@apache.org]
> *Sent:* 17 August 2016 17:07
> *To:* market...@cloudstack.apache.org; Giles Sirett <
> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com>; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sally Khudairi <
> s...@apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release
>
> Hello again, everyone --I want to reiterate that it would be a very good
> idea for us (= the Project) to solicit at few testimonials from the Apache
> CloudStack user community.
>
> One thing that we tout is that CloudStack "just works". It would be
> unusual for us to make a formal announcement regarding a major release and
> not have any testimonials.
>
> As the ASF's VP Marketing & Publicity, I can attest that we have only had
> one such announcement, which was received by the media/analyst community
> with curiosity (to put it politely) ... "why won't anyone own up to using
> your product?" is not something I'd like us to have to deal with,
> particularly as that's not the case.
>
> To that end, I will be happy to help work with you on this front, and
> strongly recommend that we consider holding off on issuing the press
> release until we have secured some user quotes.
>
> Should we choose to do this, and if we can secure the quotes by Sunday
> evening, I can issue the announcement as early as 4AM ET on Monday 22
> August. Yes, I'll be sleepy, but it's worth it 
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Warmly,
> Sally
>
> = = = = =
> vox +1 617 921 8656
> gvox +1 646 598 4616
> skype sallykhudairi
>
> --
> *From:* Sally Khudairi 
> *To:* Giles Sirett ; "
> market...@cloudstack.apache.org" ; "
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 17, 2016 10:32 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release
>
> Thanks, Giles.
>
> OK. Normally, we don't cross-collaborate on marketing/PR issues with
> public lists, but we can't unstrike the bell at this point.
>
> I'll await your clearance.
>
> -Sally
>
> = = = = =
> vox +1 617 921 8656
> gvox +1 646 598 4616
> skype sallykhudairi
>
> --
> *From:* Giles Sirett 
> *To:* "market...@cloudstack.apache.org" ;
> "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
> *Cc:* Sally Khudairi 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 17, 2016 9:11 AM
> *Subject:* RE: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release
>
> Sally
>
> I’m cross posting this to dev@ - we’ve not had much input on marketing@,
> so I’d like some other eyeballs on this if we’re going to turn it around
> today
>
> I agree, we need to get this finalised ASAP
>
> My view would be to roll with the PR immediately. I know Thurs/Fri aren’t
> great but we’ve already actually announced this so run the risk of the PR
> being 10 days after the event
>
>
> Don’t think we’ll have time to get testimonials – unless somebody wants to
> jump in here quickly
>
> I’ve drafted a quote for Will  below.
> I’ve also taken Madan’s feedback and changed the order of the feature list
> Will – please  chime in if you want something different in the quote, what
> I’ve written is pretty bland
> Is Will unable to confirm, you can attribute it to me as PMC member  as an
> alternative
>
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
> Giles
>
> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> @shapeblue
>
>
> *From:* Sally Khudairi 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1645: This converts the rbd raw format on disk to q...

[nathanejohnson]

GitHub user nathanejohnson opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645

This converts the rbd raw format on disk to qcow2 for compression.



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/myENA/cloudstack feature/convert_rbd_to_qcow

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1645


commit 44220a41c119020404c55e7a82a808ddee828116
Author: Nathan Johnson 
Date:   2016-08-17T17:17:14Z

This converts the rbd raw format on disk to qcow2 for compression.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1644: - Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafter configuratio...

[nathanejohnson]

Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1644
  
I would like to get some feedback on this from the community, this has some 
potentially unwanted side-effects with regards to usage-tracking.  In the old 
code, the amount of space used by the snapshot backup was counted against the 
user as far as I can tell.  In this new one, if the snapshot is not backed up, 
the usage would be likely be considerably less.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1644: - Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafter confi...

[nathanejohnson]

GitHub user nathanejohnson opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1644

- Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafter configuration variable

- Unhides snapshot.backup.rightafter from global configuration

CLOUDSTACK-4858


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/myENA/cloudstack 
feature/upstream_storage_snapshot_backup_rightafter

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1644.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1644


commit df80460162a00df8b0caf79532a7f708cd086bb1
Author: Nathan Johnson 
Date:   2016-08-17T15:46:42Z

- Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafter configuration variable
- Unhides snapshot.backup.rightafter from global configuration

CLOUDSTACK-4858




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

[Sally Khudairi]

Thank you, Giles.
Also, re: "v4.9" vs. "4.9", the ASF House Style is to write it as "v4.9" in the 
heading of a press release and refer to it as "4.9" elsewhere.
This is similar to our need to reference "CloudStack" as its full name, "Apache 
CloudStack" in its initial mention (press release, Website, etc.). This is a 
Trademarks/Brand Management thing, but still relevant.
To that end, I will be going through the final draft of the press release and 
ensuring that we're in synch with respect to House Style, trademarks notice, 
etc., before going live.
Of course, any proposed editorial changes will be forwarded to you before 
anything happens on that front.
As always, feel free to let me know if you need anything!
Kind thanks,Sally = = = = =  vox +1 617 921 8656gvox +1 646 598 4616skype 
sallykhudairi

  From: Giles Sirett 
 To: Sally Khudairi ; "market...@cloudstack.apache.org" 
; "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 12:10 PM
 Subject: RE: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release
   
#yiv4977100104 #yiv4977100104 -- _filtered #yiv4977100104 
{font-family:Helvetica;panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;} _filtered #yiv4977100104 
{panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv4977100104 
{font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}#yiv4977100104 
#yiv4977100104 p.yiv4977100104MsoNormal, #yiv4977100104 
li.yiv4977100104MsoNormal, #yiv4977100104 div.yiv4977100104MsoNormal 
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv4977100104 a:link, 
#yiv4977100104 span.yiv4977100104MsoHyperlink 
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4977100104 a:visited, #yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104MsoHyperlinkFollowed 
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4977100104 
p.yiv4977100104msonormal, #yiv4977100104 li.yiv4977100104msonormal, 
#yiv4977100104 div.yiv4977100104msonormal 
{margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv4977100104 
p.yiv4977100104msonormal1, #yiv4977100104 li.yiv4977100104msonormal1, 
#yiv4977100104 div.yiv4977100104msonormal1 
{margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv4977100104 
p.yiv4977100104msochpdefault, #yiv4977100104 li.yiv4977100104msochpdefault, 
#yiv4977100104 div.yiv4977100104msochpdefault 
{margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104msohyperlink {}#yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104msohyperlinkfollowed {}#yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104msohyperlink1 {}#yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104msohyperlinkfollowed1 {}#yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104emailstyle171 {}#yiv4977100104 span.yiv4977100104emailstyle25 
{}#yiv4977100104 span.yiv4977100104emailstyle26 {}#yiv4977100104 
p.yiv4977100104msonormal2, #yiv4977100104 li.yiv4977100104msonormal2, 
#yiv4977100104 div.yiv4977100104msonormal2 
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104msohyperlink2 
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104msohyperlinkfollowed2 
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4977100104 
p.yiv4977100104msonormal11, #yiv4977100104 li.yiv4977100104msonormal11, 
#yiv4977100104 div.yiv4977100104msonormal11 
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;}#yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104msohyperlink11 
{color:#0563C1;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104msohyperlinkfollowed11 
{color:#954F72;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104emailstyle1711 {color:windowtext;}#yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104emailstyle251 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104emailstyle261 {color:windowtext;}#yiv4977100104 
p.yiv4977100104msochpdefault1, #yiv4977100104 li.yiv4977100104msochpdefault1, 
#yiv4977100104 div.yiv4977100104msochpdefault1 
{margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv4977100104 
span.yiv4977100104EmailStyle37 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv4977100104 
.yiv4977100104MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv4977100104 
{margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}#yiv4977100104 
div.yiv4977100104WordSection1 {}#yiv4977100104 Sally All noted. I’m asking some 
folks for a quote – will come back to you    Kind Regards Giles    
giles.sir...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
@shapeblue
From: Sally Khudairi [mailto:s...@apache.org]
Sent: 17 August 2016 17:07
To: market...@cloudstack.apache.org; Giles Sirett ; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sally Khudairi 
Subject: Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release    Hello again, everyone 
--I want to reiterate that it would be a very good idea for us (= the Project) 
to solicit at few testimonials from the Apache CloudStack user community.    
One thing that we tout is that CloudStack "just works". It would be unusual for 
us to make a formal announcement regarding a major release and not have any 
testimonials.    As the ASF's VP Marketing & Publicity, I can attest that we 
have only had one such 

RE: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

[Giles Sirett]

Sally
All noted. I’m asking some folks for a quote – will come back to you

Kind Regards
Giles


giles.sir...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

From: Sally Khudairi [mailto:s...@apache.org]
Sent: 17 August 2016 17:07
To: market...@cloudstack.apache.org; Giles Sirett ; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sally Khudairi 
Subject: Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

Hello again, everyone --I want to reiterate that it would be a very good idea 
for us (= the Project) to solicit at few testimonials from the Apache 
CloudStack user community.

One thing that we tout is that CloudStack "just works". It would be unusual for 
us to make a formal announcement regarding a major release and not have any 
testimonials.

As the ASF's VP Marketing & Publicity, I can attest that we have only had one 
such announcement, which was received by the media/analyst community with 
curiosity (to put it politely) ... "why won't anyone own up to using your 
product?" is not something I'd like us to have to deal with, particularly as 
that's not the case.

To that end, I will be happy to help work with you on this front, and strongly 
recommend that we consider holding off on issuing the press release until we 
have secured some user quotes.

Should we choose to do this, and if we can secure the quotes by Sunday evening, 
I can issue the announcement as early as 4AM ET on Monday 22 August. Yes, I'll 
be sleepy, but it's worth it 

Thoughts?

Warmly,
Sally

= = = = =
vox +1 617 921 8656
gvox +1 646 598 4616
skype sallykhudairi


From: Sally Khudairi >
To: Giles Sirett 
>; 
"market...@cloudstack.apache.org" 
>; 
"dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
>
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

Thanks, Giles.

OK. Normally, we don't cross-collaborate on marketing/PR issues with public 
lists, but we can't unstrike the bell at this point.

I'll await your clearance.

-Sally

= = = = =
vox +1 617 921 8656
gvox +1 646 598 4616
skype sallykhudairi


From: Giles Sirett 
>
To: "market...@cloudstack.apache.org" 
>; 
"dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
>
Cc: Sally Khudairi >
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 9:11 AM
Subject: RE: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

Sally

I’m cross posting this to dev@ - we’ve not had much input on marketing@, so I’d 
like some other eyeballs on this if we’re going to turn it around today

I agree, we need to get this finalised ASAP

My view would be to roll with the PR immediately. I know Thurs/Fri aren’t great 
but we’ve already actually announced this so run the risk of the PR being 10 
days after the event


Don’t think we’ll have time to get testimonials – unless somebody wants to jump 
in here quickly

I’ve drafted a quote for Will  below.
I’ve also taken Madan’s feedback and changed the order of the feature list
Will – please  chime in if you want something different in the quote, what I’ve 
written is pretty bland
Is Will unable to confirm, you can attribute it to me as PMC member  as an 
alternative




Kind Regards
Giles

giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
@shapeblue


From: Sally Khudairi [mailto:s...@apache.org]
Sent: 17 August 2016 13:50
To: Giles Sirett 
>; 
market...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

Thanks so much, Giles. This is a great draft. Glad to see that the template is 
still useful :-)

Do let me know when the copy is locked in. I'll need the final draft by 6PM ET 
prior to the day we'll be issuing the announcement over the wire.

Seeing that we're at the end of the "ideal" release timeframe (Thursdays and 
Fridays aren't best for global media visibility), were you wanting to go 
announce on Monday or whenever you're ready?

Also, if we could please include at least a quote from the PMC Chair, that 
would be ideal.

Are there any user testimonials you'd like to include? If so, those will need 
to be secured.

Thanking you in advance,
Sally

= = = = =
vox +1 617 921 8656
gvox +1 646 598 4616
skype sallykhudairi


From: Giles 

Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

[Sally Khudairi]

Hello again, everyone --I want to reiterate that it would be a very good idea 
for us (= the Project) to solicit at few testimonials from the Apache 
CloudStack user community.
One thing that we tout is that CloudStack "just works". It would be unusual for 
us to make a formal announcement regarding a major release and not have any 
testimonials.
As the ASF's VP Marketing & Publicity, I can attest that we have only had one 
such announcement, which was received by the media/analyst community with 
curiosity (to put it politely) ... "why won't anyone own up to using your 
product?" is not something I'd like us to have to deal with, particularly as 
that's not the case.
To that end, I will be happy to help work with you on this front, and strongly 
recommend that we consider holding off on issuing the press release until we 
have secured some user quotes.
Should we choose to do this, and if we can secure the quotes by Sunday evening, 
I can issue the announcement as early as 4AM ET on Monday 22 August. Yes, I'll 
be sleepy, but it's worth it 
Thoughts?
Warmly,
Sally = = = = =  vox +1 617 921 8656gvox +1 646 598 4616skype sallykhudairi

  From: Sally Khudairi 
 To: Giles Sirett ; 
"market...@cloudstack.apache.org" ; 
"dev@cloudstack.apache.org"  
 Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 10:32 AM
 Subject: Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release
   
Thanks, Giles.
OK. Normally, we don't cross-collaborate on marketing/PR issues with public 
lists, but we can't unstrike the bell at this point.
I'll await your clearance.
-Sally = = = = =  vox +1 617 921 8656gvox +1 646 598 4616skype sallykhudairi

  From: Giles Sirett 
 To: "market...@cloudstack.apache.org" ; 
"dev@cloudstack.apache.org"  
Cc: Sally Khudairi 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: RE: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release
  
 #yiv0330137803 #yiv0330137803 -- filtered {font-family:Helvetica;panose-1:2 11 
6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}#yiv0330137803 filtered {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 
4;}#yiv0330137803 filtered {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 
4;}#yiv0330137803 p.yiv0330137803MsoNormal, #yiv0330137803 
li.yiv0330137803MsoNormal, #yiv0330137803 div.yiv0330137803MsoNormal 
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv0330137803 a:link, 
#yiv0330137803 span.yiv0330137803MsoHyperlink 
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0330137803 a:visited, #yiv0330137803 
span.yiv0330137803MsoHyperlinkFollowed 
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0330137803 
p.yiv0330137803msonormal, #yiv0330137803 li.yiv0330137803msonormal, 
#yiv0330137803 div.yiv0330137803msonormal 
{margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv0330137803 
span.yiv0330137803msohyperlink {}#yiv0330137803 
span.yiv0330137803msohyperlinkfollowed {}#yiv0330137803 
span.yiv0330137803emailstyle17 {}#yiv0330137803 p.yiv0330137803msonormal1, 
#yiv0330137803 li.yiv0330137803msonormal1, #yiv0330137803 
div.yiv0330137803msonormal1 
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;}#yiv0330137803 
span.yiv0330137803msohyperlink1 
{color:#0563C1;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0330137803 
span.yiv0330137803msohyperlinkfollowed1 
{color:#954F72;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0330137803 
span.yiv0330137803emailstyle171 {color:windowtext;}#yiv0330137803 
span.yiv0330137803EmailStyle25 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv0330137803 
span.yiv0330137803EmailStyle26 {color:windowtext;}#yiv0330137803 
.yiv0330137803MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv0330137803 filtered 
{margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}#yiv0330137803 
div.yiv0330137803WordSection1 {}#yiv0330137803 Sally    I’m cross posting this 
to dev@ - we’ve not had much input on marketing@, so I’d like some other 
eyeballs on this if we’re going to turn it around today    I agree, we need to 
get this finalised ASAP    My view would be to roll with the PR immediately. I 
know Thurs/Fri aren’t great but we’ve already actually announced this so run 
the risk of the PR being 10 days after the event       Don’t think we’ll have 
time to get testimonials – unless somebody wants to jump in here quickly    
I’ve drafted a quote for Will  below. I’ve also taken Madan’s feedback and 
changed the order of the feature list Will – please  chime in if you want 
something different in the quote, what I’ve written is pretty bland Is Will 
unable to confirm, you can attribute it to me as PMC member  as an alternative  
           Kind Regards Giles    giles.sir...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
@shapeblue
From: Sally Khudairi [mailto:s...@apache.org]
Sent: 17 August 2016 13:50
To: Giles Sirett ; market...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release    Thanks so much, Giles. 
This is a great draft. Glad to see that the template is still useful :-)    Do 
let 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[serg38]

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
@jburwell Support for NFS version for Secondary storage is already merged 
via PR 1361.  Since there were integration tests developed and executed over 
there we seem to be needed tests only for new API behavior. Do you agree? 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1640: CLOUDSTACK-9458: Fix HA bug when VMs are stopped on ...

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
  
Are there Marvin test cases to verify this behavior?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1640: CLOUDSTACK-9458: Fix HA bug when VMs are stop...

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640#discussion_r75147713
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/ha/HighAvailabilityManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -497,7 +498,7 @@ protected Long restart(final HaWorkVO work) {
 
 boolean fenced = false;
 if (alive == null) {
-s_logger.debug("Fencing off VM that we don't know the 
state of");
+s_logger.debug("Fencing off VM " + vm + " that we 
don't know the state of");
--- End diff --

Please wrap in a isDebugEnabled check to avoid expensive string 
concatenation when DEBUG is off.  Also, should this message be a WARN instead 
of a DEBUG?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1640: CLOUDSTACK-9458: Fix HA bug when VMs are stopped on ...

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
  
@marcaurele Would you mind adding these notes to the bug ticket?  It seems 
like valuable information that people searching JIRA for issues would find very 
useful.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
@nvazquez could you please add Marvin test cases to verify the new API 
behavior? The tests should not only verify that the endpoints return the 
versions expected, but that the storage pools honor the version specified. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1640: CLOUDSTACK-9458: Fix HA bug when VMs are stopped on ...

[marcaurele]

Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
  
I'll do the long explanation regarding the bug in production we had.

Twice we had the VPN going down between 2 of our zones which resulted in 
the lost of the communication between the management server and all the agents 
of the other zone. After a few minutes the network went back and as the agents 
were reconnecting we started to see VMs being shutdown, even though we don't 
have HA enabled. We have 2 management servers in front of haproxy to balance 
agents & requests. When the network went back, the agent reconnected to the 
other management server 01. The server 02 had already started to issue some 
commands to shutdown the VM.

The important lines are here, I kept the line showing one VM being shutdown 
`111750`:

```
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,854 DEBUG [cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl] 
(AgentTaskPool-16:ctx-8b5b6956) PingInvestigator was able to determine host 
44692 is in Disconnected
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,855 WARN  [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] 
(AgentTaskPool-16:ctx-8b5b6956) Agent is disconnected but the host is still up: 
44692-virt-hv041
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,857 WARN  [apache.cloudstack.alerts] 
(AgentTaskPool-16:ctx-8b5b6956)  alertType:: 7 // dataCenterId:: 2 // podId:: 2 
// clusterId:: null // message:: Host disconnected, name: virt-hv041 
(id:44692), availability zone: ch-dk-2, pod: DK2-AZ1-POD01
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,884 INFO  [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] 
(AgentTaskPool-16:ctx-8b5b6956) Host 44692 is disconnecting with event 
AgentDisconnected
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,895 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] 
(AgentTaskPool-16:ctx-8b5b6956) The next status of agent 44692is Alert, current 
status is Up
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,896 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] 
(AgentTaskPool-16:ctx-8b5b6956) Deregistering link for 44692 with state Alert
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,896 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] 
(AgentTaskPool-16:ctx-8b5b6956) Remove Agent : 44692
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,897 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentAttache] 
(AgentTaskPool-16:ctx-8b5b6956) Seq 44692-4932286016900831481: Sending 
disconnect to class com.cloud.network.security.SecurityGroupListener
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,897 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentAttache] 
(AgentTaskPool-16:ctx-8b5b6956) Seq 44692-4932286016900834802: Sending 
disconnect to class com.cloud.network.security.SecurityGroupListener
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,897 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentAttache] 
(AgentTaskPool-16:ctx-8b5b6956) Seq 44692-4932286016900886805: Sending 
disconnect to class com.cloud.network.security.SecurityGroupListener
...
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,979 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkUsageManagerImpl] 
(AgentTaskPool-16:ctx-8b5b6956) Disconnected called on 44692 with status Alert
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,987 DEBUG [cloud.host.Status] 
(AgentTaskPool-16:ctx-8b5b6956) Transition:[Resource state = Enabled, Agent 
event = AgentDisconnected, Host id = 44692, name = virt-hv041]
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,998 DEBUG [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl] 
(AgentTaskPool-16:ctx-8b5b6956) Forwarding 
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.ChangeAgentCommand":{"agentId":44692,"event":"AgentDisconnected","contextMap":{},"wait":0}}]
 to 345049010805
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:03,998 DEBUG [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl] 
(Cluster-Worker-2:ctx-e087e71f) Cluster PDU 90520739220960 -> 345049010805. 
agent: 44692, pdu seq: 15, pdu ack seq: 0, json: 
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.ChangeAgentCommand":{"agentId":44692,"event":"AgentDisconnected","contextMap":{},"wait":0}}]
srv01 2016-08-08 11:56:04,002 DEBUG 
[agent.manager.ClusteredAgentManagerImpl] (Cluster-Worker-9:ctx-9101a6d4) 
Dispatch ->44692, json: 
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.ChangeAgentCommand":{"agentId":44692,"event":"AgentDisconnected","contextMap":{},"wait":0}}]
srv01 2016-08-08 11:56:04,002 DEBUG 
[agent.manager.ClusteredAgentManagerImpl] (Cluster-Worker-9:ctx-9101a6d4) 
Intercepting command for agent change: agent 44692 event: AgentDisconnected
srv01 2016-08-08 11:56:04,002 DEBUG 
[agent.manager.ClusteredAgentManagerImpl] (Cluster-Worker-9:ctx-9101a6d4) 
Received agent disconnect event for host 44692
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:04,002 DEBUG [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl] 
(Cluster-Worker-2:ctx-e087e71f) Cluster PDU 90520739220960 -> 345049010805 
completed. time: 3ms. agent: 44692, pdu seq: 15, pdu ack seq: 0, json: 
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.ChangeAgentCommand":{"agentId":44692,"event":"AgentDisconnected","contextMap":{},"wait":0}}]
srv01 2016-08-08 11:56:04,004 DEBUG 
[agent.manager.ClusteredAgentManagerImpl] (Cluster-Worker-9:ctx-9101a6d4) Not 
processing AgentDisconnected event for the host id=44692 as the host is 
directly connected to the current management server 345049010805
srv02 2016-08-08 11:56:04,004 WARN  [cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl] 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[GabrielBrascher]

Github user GabrielBrascher commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
@serg38 @nvazquez the code seems ok.
Is there anything pending with the _blueorangutan_ test?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

[Sally Khudairi]

Thanks, Giles.
OK. Normally, we don't cross-collaborate on marketing/PR issues with public 
lists, but we can't unstrike the bell at this point.
I'll await your clearance.
-Sally = = = = =  vox +1 617 921 8656gvox +1 646 598 4616skype sallykhudairi

  From: Giles Sirett 
 To: "market...@cloudstack.apache.org" ; 
"dev@cloudstack.apache.org"  
Cc: Sally Khudairi 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: RE: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release
   
 Sally    I’m cross 
posting this to dev@ - we’ve not had much input on marketing@, so I’d like some 
other eyeballs on this if we’re going to turn it around today    I agree, we 
need to get this finalised ASAP    My view would be to roll with the PR 
immediately. I know Thurs/Fri aren’t great but we’ve already actually announced 
this so run the risk of the PR being 10 days after the event       Don’t think 
we’ll have time to get testimonials – unless somebody wants to jump in here 
quickly    I’ve drafted a quote for Will  below. I’ve also taken Madan’s 
feedback and changed the order of the feature list Will – please  chime in if 
you want something different in the quote, what I’ve written is pretty bland Is 
Will unable to confirm, you can attribute it to me as PMC member  as an 
alternative             Kind Regards Giles    giles.sir...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
@shapeblue
From: Sally Khudairi [mailto:s...@apache.org]
Sent: 17 August 2016 13:50
To: Giles Sirett ; market...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release    Thanks so much, Giles. 
This is a great draft. Glad to see that the template is still useful :-)    Do 
let me know when the copy is locked in. I'll need the final draft by 6PM ET 
prior to the day we'll be issuing the announcement over the wire.    Seeing 
that we're at the end of the "ideal" release timeframe (Thursdays and Fridays 
aren't best for global media visibility), were you wanting to go announce on 
Monday or whenever you're ready?    Also, if we could please include at least a 
quote from the PMC Chair, that would be ideal.     Are there any user 
testimonials you'd like to include? If so, those will need to be secured.    
Thanking you in advance, Sally   = = = = =  vox +1 617 921 8656 gvox +1 646 598 
4616 skype sallykhudairi    From: Giles Sirett 
To: "market...@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Cc: Sally Khudairi 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 6:15 AM
Subject: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release    All I’ve drafted the 
following for the 4.9 press release. Please chime in with comments/changes/etc 
(bearing in mind, that we really need to get a release out ASAP as its been 
already 5 days since the [announce] was sent)   Despite the scale of this 
release , there are not many super-exciting/headline-grabbing new features so 
I’ve cherry picked these for the Press release:   - Enhancements to Cloudstack 
networking model including deeper integration with Nuage VSP SDN -Out of band 
power management of hosts through IPMI,iLO,DRAC -User defined security roles 
-Over 180 minor enhancements and issues fixed   Happy if somebody else can help 
find some other headline features from the release notes (BTW – the 180 came 
from the complete list of issues fixed)     ##starts##   [APACHE CLOUDSTACK 
LOGO]   Announcing Apache™ CloudStack™ v4.9   Mature, easy-to-deploy Open 
Source Cloud computing software continues to meet the demands of the worlds 
largest cloud providers.   [DATELINE] —[date]—The Apache CloudStack project 
today announced the immediate availability of Apache CloudStack v4.9, the 
latest version of the turnkey Open Source cloud computing software platform 
used for creating private-, public-, and hybrid cloud environments.   Apache 
CloudStack clouds enable billions of dollars' worth of business transactions 
annually across their clouds, and its maturity, stability and ease of 
deployment has led it to has become the Open Source platform for many service 
providers to set up on-demand, elastic public cloud computing services, as well 
as enterprises and others to set up a private or hybrid cloud for use by their 
own employees.   CloudStack includes an intuitive user interface and rich APIs 
for managing the compute, networking, software, and storage infrastructure 
resources. It supports a broad range of integration points for both traditional 
and cloud-native workloads.   CloudStack v4.9 reflects dozens of new features 
and improvements, including:    -Out of band power management of hosts through 
IPMI,iLO,DRAC - Enhancements to Cloudstack networking model including deeper 
integration with Nuage VSP SDN -User defined security roles -Over 180 minor 
enhancements and issues fixed   A complete overview of all new enhancements can 
be found in the project 

RE: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

[Giles Sirett]

Sally

I’m cross posting this to dev@ - we’ve not had much input on marketing@, so I’d 
like some other eyeballs on this if we’re going to turn it around today

I agree, we need to get this finalised ASAP

My view would be to roll with the PR immediately. I know Thurs/Fri aren’t great 
but we’ve already actually announced this so run the risk of the PR being 10 
days after the event


Don’t think we’ll have time to get testimonials – unless somebody wants to jump 
in here quickly

I’ve drafted a quote for Will  below.
I’ve also taken Madan’s feedback and changed the order of the feature list
Will – please  chime in if you want something different in the quote, what I’ve 
written is pretty bland
Is Will unable to confirm, you can attribute it to me as PMC member  as an 
alternative




Kind Regards
Giles


giles.sir...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

From: Sally Khudairi [mailto:s...@apache.org]
Sent: 17 August 2016 13:50
To: Giles Sirett ; market...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

Thanks so much, Giles. This is a great draft. Glad to see that the template is 
still useful :-)

Do let me know when the copy is locked in. I'll need the final draft by 6PM ET 
prior to the day we'll be issuing the announcement over the wire.

Seeing that we're at the end of the "ideal" release timeframe (Thursdays and 
Fridays aren't best for global media visibility), were you wanting to go 
announce on Monday or whenever you're ready?

Also, if we could please include at least a quote from the PMC Chair, that 
would be ideal.

Are there any user testimonials you'd like to include? If so, those will need 
to be secured.

Thanking you in advance,
Sally

= = = = =
vox +1 617 921 8656
gvox +1 646 598 4616
skype sallykhudairi


From: Giles Sirett 
>
To: "market...@cloudstack.apache.org" 
>
Cc: Sally Khudairi >
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 6:15 AM
Subject: [draft for review] -4.9 -press release

All
I’ve drafted the following for the 4.9 press release.
Please chime in with comments/changes/etc (bearing in mind, that we really need 
to get a release out ASAP as its been already 5 days since the [announce] was 
sent)

Despite the scale of this release , there are not many 
super-exciting/headline-grabbing new features so I’ve cherry picked these for 
the Press release:

- Enhancements to Cloudstack networking model including deeper integration with 
Nuage VSP SDN
-Out of band power management of hosts through IPMI,iLO,DRAC
-User defined security roles
-Over 180 minor enhancements and issues fixed

Happy if somebody else can help find some other headline features from the 
release notes
(BTW – the 180 came from the complete list of issues fixed)


##starts##

[APACHE CLOUDSTACK LOGO]

Announcing Apache™ CloudStack™ v4.9

Mature, easy-to-deploy Open Source Cloud computing software continues to meet 
the demands of the worlds largest cloud providers.

[DATELINE] —[date]—The Apache CloudStack project today announced the immediate
availability of Apache CloudStack v4.9, the latest version of the turnkey Open 
Source cloud
computing software platform used for creating private-, public-, and hybrid 
cloud environments.

Apache CloudStack clouds enable billions of dollars' worth of business 
transactions annually
across their clouds, and its maturity, stability and ease of deployment has led 
it to has become the Open Source
platform for many service providers to set up on-demand, elastic public cloud 
computing services,
as well as enterprises and others to set up a private or hybrid cloud for use 
by their own
employees.

CloudStack includes an intuitive user interface and rich APIs for managing the 
compute, networking, software, and storage infrastructure resources. It 
supports a broad range of integration points for both traditional and 
cloud-native workloads.

CloudStack v4.9 reflects dozens of new features and improvements, including:

-Out of band power management of hosts through IPMI,iLO,DRAC
- Enhancements to Cloudstack networking model including deeper integration with 
Nuage VSP SDN
-User defined security roles
-Over 180 minor enhancements and issues fixed

A complete overview of all new enhancements can be found in the project release 
notes at 
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.9.0/

CloudStack has been used by thousands of organizations worldwide and is in 
use/production
at Alcatel-Lucent, Autodesk, BT Cloud, China Telecom, DataPipe, Exoscale, 
Globo.com, GreenQloud,
Hokkaido University, IDC Frontier, Ikoula, Interoute, KDDI, KT/Korea Telecom, 
LeaseWeb, NTT, Orange,
PCextreme, Schuberg Philis, 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1640: CLOUDSTACK-9458: Fix HA bug when VMs are stopped on ...

[koushik-das]

Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
  
@marcaurele Can you share the MS logs for this issue? We need to understand 
the exact cause for restart of VM? When an agent/host is detected as 'Down', CS 
tries to check if VMs on it are alive or not, if found alive nothing is done on 
the VM.

Also if you think that the host got disconnected intermittently, then there 
are ways to adjust the timeout in CS after which it will start investigating 
the host status. Try adjusting the ping.timeout configuration parameter to see 
if the issue is resolved.

The investigation to check if VM is alive or not is done for all VMs 
irrespective of HA enabled or not. If a host is really down then it makes sense 
to mark the VMs as stopped. Additionally for HA enabled VMs, after they are 
successfully fenced off, attempt is made to restart them on other hosts in the 
cluster.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1643: CLOUDSTACK-9460: For long running transaction...

[abhinandanprateek]

GitHub user abhinandanprateek opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1643

CLOUDSTACK-9460: For long running transactions, if the connection is

timed out by the mysql server then refresh it

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack master_db_timeout

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1643.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1643


commit bbbd90abc982afd04d872b6f6b81927e11a05237
Author: Abhinandan Prateek 
Date:   2016-08-17T10:45:15Z

CLOUDSTACK-9460: For long running transactions, if the connection is
timed out by the mysql server then refresh it




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1640: CLOUDSTACK-9458: Fix HA bug when VMs are stopped on ...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian repo: 
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1640
Job ID-89


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: System VMs on Managed Storage

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian repo: 
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1642
Job ID-88


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1640: CLOUDSTACK-9458: Fix HA bug when VMs are stop...

[marcaurele]

Github user marcaurele commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640#discussion_r75091738
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/ha/HighAvailabilityManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -282,7 +282,9 @@ public void scheduleRestartForVmsOnHost(final HostVO 
host, boolean investigate)
 + hostId + " VM HA is done");
 continue;
 }
-scheduleRestart(vm, investigate);
+if (vm.isHaEnabled()) {
--- End diff --

Sure, I'll update


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1640: CLOUDSTACK-9458: Fix HA bug when VMs are stop...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640#discussion_r75089504
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/ha/HighAvailabilityManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -282,7 +282,9 @@ public void scheduleRestartForVmsOnHost(final HostVO 
host, boolean investigate)
 + hostId + " VM HA is done");
 continue;
 }
-scheduleRestart(vm, investigate);
+if (vm.isHaEnabled()) {
--- End diff --

Why not skip the loop with a `continue` around line 268 when vm is not HA 
enabled?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1640: CLOUDSTACK-9458: Fix HA bug when VMs are stopped on ...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1640: CLOUDSTACK-9458: Fix HA bug when VMs are stopped on ...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
  
@blueorangutan package

LGTM, @abhinandanprateek can you review this as well?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: System VMs on Managed Storage

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@blueorangutan package

@mike-tutkowski LGTM, we don't have any hardware to test it. I guess since 
builds have passed and if packaging passes too, we can merge with enough 
reviews.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: System VMs on Managed Storage

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1037: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-8937 - XenServer migrations with ...

[atrbgithub]

Github user atrbgithub commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1037
  
I believe this can be closed now. 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1336 and 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1596 address this problem. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #925: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-8937 - XenServer migrations with s...

[atrbgithub]

Github user atrbgithub commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/925
  
I believe this can be closed now. 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1336 and 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1596 address this problem. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Migrate master to Spring 4.x

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian repo: 
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/pr/1638
Job ID-87


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1611: marvin: deploy clusters in separate threads

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1611#discussion_r75074266
  
--- Diff: tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py ---
@@ -224,6 +225,15 @@ def createClusters(self, clusters, zoneId, podId, 
vmwareDc=None):
podId,
clusterId)
 
+threads = []
+for cluster in clusters:
+t = threading.Thread(target=createCluster, args=(cluster,))
+t.start()
+threads.append(t)
+
+for t in threads:
+t.join(1800)
--- End diff --

Thanks I'll fix this later this week.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Migrate master to Spring 4.x

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
  
@jburwell fixed, it's jdk7+spring4 now


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Proof of CloudStack compatibility with vSphere 6

[Alireza Eskandari]

Hi all,Our team want to test compatibility of CloudStack with vSphere 6.1- 
Which tests should we run in our environment to make sure that vSphere 6 is 
fully compatible with CloudStack?2- From which version of CloudStack we can use 
vSphere 6?Regards,Alireza 

Re: Upgrade from 4.8.0.1 to 4.9 issue

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Marty,


Please use this guide to switch to dynamic role feature from the default 
static-checker:

http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.io/en/4.9/accounts.html#using-dynamic-roles


If you've manually set the global setting to true, you need to move/rename the 
commands.properties file in the classpath (usually at 
/etc/cloudstack/management/ or somewhere in /usr/share/cloudstack-management). 
You can use a python script (see the link above) to migrate existing rules in 
commands.properties file to the database.


Regards.


From: Marty Godsey 
Sent: 17 August 2016 09:57:05
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Upgrade from 4.8.0.1 to 4.9 issue

I upgraded a very clean environment of 4.8.0.1 to 4.9 and I am receiving this 
error when trying to enable the dynamic.apichecker.enabled setting:

2016-08-17 00:20:03,148 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] 
(catalina-exec-25:ctx-01fb5369) (logid:3a6b506e) ===START===  192.168.250.250 
-- GET  
command=updateConfiguration=json=dynamic.apichecker.enabled=true&_=1471407604828
2016-08-17 00:20:03,156 INFO  [c.c.a.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-25:ctx-01fb5369 
ctx-9c3c87d4) (logid:3a6b506e) Restricted configuration update not allowed
2016-08-17 00:20:03,157 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-25:ctx-01fb5369 
ctx-9c3c87d4) (logid:3a6b506e) ===END===  192.168.250.250 -- GET  
command=updateConfiguration=json=dynamic.apichecker.enabled=true&_=1471407604828

When I say clean this is an environment that is all of two weeks old and has 2 
instances and about 5 accounts. These accounts are LDAP integrated and 
authenticate without issue after the update. All functions seems to work accept 
the role-based additions. The GUI doesn't even show the little icon in the tab. 
The management servers are Ubuntu 14.04.05 and the I am using community 
packages. There were no errors on the update.

Thank you for the help.

Regards,
Marty Godsey


rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1611: marvin: deploy clusters in separate threads

[koushik-das]

Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1611#discussion_r75071072
  
--- Diff: tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py ---
@@ -224,6 +225,15 @@ def createClusters(self, clusters, zoneId, podId, 
vmwareDc=None):
podId,
clusterId)
 
+threads = []
+for cluster in clusters:
+t = threading.Thread(target=createCluster, args=(cluster,))
+t.start()
+threads.append(t)
+
+for t in threads:
+t.join(1800)
--- End diff --

Instead of hardcoding, better to set it based on host count in the cluster. 
Also consider that waitForHost() can wait upto 60 secs.

If one t.join() throws what happens to the other threads. Also will 
__cleanAndExit() behave consistently if there are exceptions in multiple 
threads.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1619: Add the Transifex config for next version of CS (4.1...

[milamberspace]

Github user milamberspace commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1619
  

Add the transifex config for new L10N resources files must be done after 
each new major release on master branch (for the N+1 release, and after the 
creation of the release branch)

After, we must update the translation on each branch (releases and master 
branch) regularly or just before make a minor release.

For the documentation, I've just update the wiki:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Update+L10N+files+from+Transifex+to+git+repo



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1593: CLOUDSTACK-9417: Usage module refactoring

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Secondary VM https download certificate error

[Marty Godsey]

Hello,

I have updated my SSVMs to use SSL for traffic. I have uploaded my cert and 
almost everything works as intended. The console proxy works without issue. If 
I go to an instance and click view console, I am not prompted for an invalid 
certificate. However, if I go to templates and click download template, I get a 
properly formatted url:

https://ip.ip.ip.ip.mydomain.com/userdata/*

but the certificate is signed by systemvm which causes the browser to complain. 
I followed the documentation as written. I updated:

secstorage.encrypt.copy = true
secstorage.ssl.cert.domain = *.mydomain.com
consoleproxy.url.domain = *.mydomain.com

I also uploaded the cert and it was successful. I am confident everything is 
set from the cert side since the proxy works. I have rebooted the secondary 
storage vm numerous times and also destroyed it so it was recreated.

My ACS version is 4.9.


Regards,
Marty Godsey