date:20161127

RE: rVPC

2016-11-27 Thread Paul Angus

Thanks for this information Wei,

It there a detailed design document which imcludes this kind of information for 
the redundant routers and VPCs?
My understanding is that they use VRRP, which *can* use a 'virtual MAC' but the 
primary MAC addresses of the public interface should be unique - with the last 
byte of the MAC address matching representing the  Virtual Router Identifier.


I'd like to understand why this was implemented differently.



Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 28 November 2016 06:05
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: rVPC

Hi Paul,

CloudStack is designed like it. Not only RVR on VPC, but also RVR for isolated 
network, the MAC on public interface are the same on MASTER/BACKUP.

-Wei

2016-11-27 21:30 GMT+01:00 Paul Angus :

> Hey Wilder,
>
> I hope that you are well.
>
> We've found that the rVPC seems to use the same MAC address on the 
> public interface of both the Master and Backup rVPC nodes - was this by 
> design?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1755: CLOUDSTACK-9584: run component tests in Travis run

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1755
  
@abhinandanprateek @murali-reddy @jburwell @serg38 @nvazquez @syed 
@koushik-das @karuturi @milamberspace @wido @JayapalUradi @K0zka 
@rafaelweingartner @yvsubhash -- ping, please help review this.
This will add some existing (800+ test cases) component tests to Travis 
run, with aim to (1) finish each Travis sub-job within 45 mins, (2) run RAT 
related checks and build with `-Dnoredist` in the first job.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1623: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Enable/disable static NAT associate...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
  
@abhinandanprateek @murali-reddy ping


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1637: Command route not available on CentOS 7

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1637
  
@lmrv ping


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1655: Fix ajaxviewer.js to solve console on Firefox

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1655
  
@lygutas ping, can you get a JIRA id for this and rebase the branch to 4.8 
or 4.9, and change the PR's base branch to 4.8 or 4.9? Thanks.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1722: CLOUDSTACK-9558 Cleanup the snapshots on the primary...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1722
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1706: CLOUDSTACK-9500: remove the IP from the databag if i...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1706
  
@murali-reddy can you help review this? thanks.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1722: CLOUDSTACK-9558 Cleanup the snapshots on the primary...

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1722
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1781: CLOUDSTACK-9612: Fixed issue in restarting redundant...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1781
  
@jayapalu this looks useful, can you change PR's base branch to 4.9? Thanks.
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1781: CLOUDSTACK-9612: Fixed issue in restarting redundant...

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1781
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1782: CLOUDSTACK-9617: Fixed enabling remote access after ...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1782
  
@murali-reddy can you help review this?
@jayapalu this looks useful, can you rebase against 4.9 and change PR's 
base branch to 4.9?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
@jayapalu can you rebase against 4.9 and change PR's base branch to 4.9? 
Thanks.
@murali-reddy can you help review this?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1784: CS-505: Marvin test to check VR internal DNS Service

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1784
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1784: CS-505: Marvin test to check VR internal DNS Service

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1784
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Migrate master to Spring 4.x

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
  
Trillian test result (tid-466)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 28617 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1638-t466-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 46 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Failure` | 846.90 | 
test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 917.78 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_assign_and_removal_lb | `Failure` | 166.80 | test_loadbalance.py
test_02_create_lb_rule_non_nat | `Failure` | 166.91 | test_loadbalance.py
test_01_create_lb_rule_src_nat | `Failure` | 207.28 | test_loadbalance.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 154.38 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 85.91 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 265.11 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 281.60 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 542.59 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1315.82 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 578.06 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 780.50 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1365.40 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.46 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.36 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.27 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.26 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.15 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.23 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.75 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 712.57 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 302.73 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.64 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.68 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 130.70 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 130.66 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 45.28 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 90.56 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.12 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.08 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.11 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 55.38 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 166.71 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 168.59 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 136.73 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 138.65 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 137.00 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 168.82 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.22 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.32 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.02 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 244.41 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.03 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.07 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.10 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.13 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 40.25 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 30.23 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 15.14 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.03 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup |

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1792: CLOUDSTACK-9623: Deploying virtual machine fa...

2016-11-27 Thread nitin-maharana

GitHub user nitin-maharana opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1792

CLOUDSTACK-9623: Deploying virtual machine fails due to "Couldn't find 
vlanId" in Basic Zone

In Basic zone, while deploying a VM it fails with an unexpected exception.
This is reproducible only when java asserts are enabled.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/nitin-maharana/CloudStack-Nitin nitin4

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1792.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1792


commit f01778a1ddc9c2daeaf0f0a3c1eed7194d696ea4
Author: Nitin Kumar Maharana 
Date:   2016-11-28T06:41:41Z

CLOUDSTACK-9623: Deploying virtual machine fails due to "Couldn't find 
vlanId" in Basic Zone




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: rVPC

2016-11-27 Thread Wei ZHOU

Hi Paul,

CloudStack is designed like it. Not only RVR on VPC, but also RVR for
isolated network, the MAC on public interface are the same on MASTER/BACKUP.

-Wei

2016-11-27 21:30 GMT+01:00 Paul Angus :

> Hey Wilder,
>
> I hope that you are well.
>
> We've found that the rVPC seems to use the same MAC address on the public
> interface of both the Master and Backup rVPC nodes - was this by design?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Re: ACS 4.8.1: Virtual router - /var/log always full

2016-11-27 Thread Wei ZHOU

This is because the free space in systemvm template is not big, and
logrotate rules are not wise enough to hold the logs.

you can remove the "delaycompress" and reduce the "size" in
systemvm/patches/debian/config/etc/logrotate.d/rsyslog
(/etc/logrotate.d/rsyslog in VR/systemvms), then restart logrotate to fix
it.

-Wei

2016-11-28 5:45 GMT+01:00 Will Stevens :

> Are you using XenServer?  We recently found a bug in XenServer which has
> similar characteristics.  I can put together details of the problem if
> yes...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Will
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> 
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Cloud List  wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Please ignore this, managed to find the reason - paswd_server_ip process
> is
> > holding to a log file which has been deleted earlier to fix the disk
> space
> > issue. Restarted the process and the disk space is fine now.
> >
> > ===
> > passwd_se  2199   root1w  REG 254,10
> > 171802407 15 /var/log/cloud.log (deleted)
> > passwd_se  2199   root2w  REG 254,10
> > 171802407 15 /var/log/cloud.log (deleted)
> > passwd_se  2199   root3w  REG 254,10
> > 171802407 15 /var/log/cloud.log (deleted)
> > python 2202   root3w  REG 254,10
> > 171802407 15 /var/log/cloud.log (deleted)
> >
> >  2199 ?S  0:00 /bin/bash /opt/cloud/bin/passwd_server_ip
> > X.X.X.2 dummy
> >  2202 ?S  7:13 python /opt/cloud/bin/passwd_server_ip.py
> > X.X.X.2
> > ===
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Cloud List 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > After upgrading to ACS 4.8.1, one of our virtual router's /var/log
> > > partition is always full and used up quite fast. This caused the VR not
> > > able to serve DHCP and password requests from VM.
> > >
> > > root@r-4155-VM:/var/log# df -h
> > > Filesystem  Size  Used
> Avail
> > > Use% Mounted on
> > > rootfs  461M  158M
> 280M
> > > 37% /
> > > udev 10M 0
> > > 10M   0% /dev
> > > tmpfs25M  236K
> > > 25M   1% /run
> > > /dev/disk/by-uuid/30c81d3d-ee9f-4a88-81c1-5f349b22ba1d  461M  158M
> 280M
> > > 37% /
> > > tmpfs   5.0M 0
> > > 5.0M   0% /run/lock
> > > tmpfs   157M 0
> > > 157M   0% /run/shm
> > > /dev/vda173M   23M
>  47M
> > > 33% /boot
> > > /dev/vda692M  5.6M
> > > 81M   7% /home
> > > /dev/vda8   184M  6.2M
> > > 169M   4% /opt
> > > /dev/vda11   92M  5.6M
> > > 81M   7% /tmp
> > > /dev/vda7   751M  493M
> 219M
> > > 70% /usr
> > > /dev/vda9   563M  282M
> 252M
> > > 53% /var
> > > /dev/vda10  184M  176M
>  0
> > > 100% /var/log
> > >
> > > Even after rotating and clearing the logs, the usage of /var/log is
> only
> > > 4.7M so I am not too sure where is the 176M coming from.
> > >
> > > root@r-4155-VM:/var/log# du -h
> > > 1.0K./samba
> > > 3.8M./sysstat
> > > 68K ./apt
> > > 7.0K./apache2
> > > 3.0K./fsck
> > > 317K./installer/cdebconf
> > > 809K./installer
> > > 1.0K./news
> > > 12K ./lost+found
> > > 1.0K./ntpstats
> > > 4.7M.
> > >
> > > /dev/vda10  184M  175M
> 475K
> > > 100% /var/log
> > >
> > > I would need to clear the logs and do a "service dnsmasq restart"
> > > regularly to make the VR functioning again, which is quite troublesome.
> > >
> > > Any advice is greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > >
> > > Cheers.
> > >
> >
>

Re: ACS 4.8.1: Virtual router - /var/log always full

2016-11-27 Thread Will Stevens

Are you using XenServer?  We recently found a bug in XenServer which has
similar characteristics.  I can put together details of the problem if
yes...

Cheers,

Will

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer



On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Cloud List  wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Please ignore this, managed to find the reason - paswd_server_ip process is
> holding to a log file which has been deleted earlier to fix the disk space
> issue. Restarted the process and the disk space is fine now.
>
> ===
> passwd_se  2199   root1w  REG 254,10
> 171802407 15 /var/log/cloud.log (deleted)
> passwd_se  2199   root2w  REG 254,10
> 171802407 15 /var/log/cloud.log (deleted)
> passwd_se  2199   root3w  REG 254,10
> 171802407 15 /var/log/cloud.log (deleted)
> python 2202   root3w  REG 254,10
> 171802407 15 /var/log/cloud.log (deleted)
>
>  2199 ?S  0:00 /bin/bash /opt/cloud/bin/passwd_server_ip
> X.X.X.2 dummy
>  2202 ?S  7:13 python /opt/cloud/bin/passwd_server_ip.py
> X.X.X.2
> ===
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Cloud List  wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > After upgrading to ACS 4.8.1, one of our virtual router's /var/log
> > partition is always full and used up quite fast. This caused the VR not
> > able to serve DHCP and password requests from VM.
> >
> > root@r-4155-VM:/var/log# df -h
> > Filesystem  Size  Used Avail
> > Use% Mounted on
> > rootfs  461M  158M  280M
> > 37% /
> > udev 10M 0
> > 10M   0% /dev
> > tmpfs25M  236K
> > 25M   1% /run
> > /dev/disk/by-uuid/30c81d3d-ee9f-4a88-81c1-5f349b22ba1d  461M  158M  280M
> > 37% /
> > tmpfs   5.0M 0
> > 5.0M   0% /run/lock
> > tmpfs   157M 0
> > 157M   0% /run/shm
> > /dev/vda173M   23M   47M
> > 33% /boot
> > /dev/vda692M  5.6M
> > 81M   7% /home
> > /dev/vda8   184M  6.2M
> > 169M   4% /opt
> > /dev/vda11   92M  5.6M
> > 81M   7% /tmp
> > /dev/vda7   751M  493M  219M
> > 70% /usr
> > /dev/vda9   563M  282M  252M
> > 53% /var
> > /dev/vda10  184M  176M 0
> > 100% /var/log
> >
> > Even after rotating and clearing the logs, the usage of /var/log is only
> > 4.7M so I am not too sure where is the 176M coming from.
> >
> > root@r-4155-VM:/var/log# du -h
> > 1.0K./samba
> > 3.8M./sysstat
> > 68K ./apt
> > 7.0K./apache2
> > 3.0K./fsck
> > 317K./installer/cdebconf
> > 809K./installer
> > 1.0K./news
> > 12K ./lost+found
> > 1.0K./ntpstats
> > 4.7M.
> >
> > /dev/vda10  184M  175M  475K
> > 100% /var/log
> >
> > I would need to clear the logs and do a "service dnsmasq restart"
> > regularly to make the VR functioning again, which is quite troublesome.
> >
> > Any advice is greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1784: CS-505: Marvin test to check VR internal DNS Service

2016-11-27 Thread abhinandanprateek

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1784
  
@rhtyd the test_router_dns checks external dns service on virtual router. 
This test case checks the internal dns service from the user VMs.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: ACS 4.8.1: Virtual router - /var/log always full

2016-11-27 Thread Cloud List

Dear all,

Please ignore this, managed to find the reason - paswd_server_ip process is
holding to a log file which has been deleted earlier to fix the disk space
issue. Restarted the process and the disk space is fine now.

===
passwd_se  2199   root1w  REG 254,10
171802407 15 /var/log/cloud.log (deleted)
passwd_se  2199   root2w  REG 254,10
171802407 15 /var/log/cloud.log (deleted)
passwd_se  2199   root3w  REG 254,10
171802407 15 /var/log/cloud.log (deleted)
python 2202   root3w  REG 254,10
171802407 15 /var/log/cloud.log (deleted)

 2199 ?S  0:00 /bin/bash /opt/cloud/bin/passwd_server_ip
X.X.X.2 dummy
 2202 ?S  7:13 python /opt/cloud/bin/passwd_server_ip.py X.X.X.2
===

Thank you.


On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Cloud List  wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> After upgrading to ACS 4.8.1, one of our virtual router's /var/log
> partition is always full and used up quite fast. This caused the VR not
> able to serve DHCP and password requests from VM.
>
> root@r-4155-VM:/var/log# df -h
> Filesystem  Size  Used Avail
> Use% Mounted on
> rootfs  461M  158M  280M
> 37% /
> udev 10M 0
> 10M   0% /dev
> tmpfs25M  236K
> 25M   1% /run
> /dev/disk/by-uuid/30c81d3d-ee9f-4a88-81c1-5f349b22ba1d  461M  158M  280M
> 37% /
> tmpfs   5.0M 0
> 5.0M   0% /run/lock
> tmpfs   157M 0
> 157M   0% /run/shm
> /dev/vda173M   23M   47M
> 33% /boot
> /dev/vda692M  5.6M
> 81M   7% /home
> /dev/vda8   184M  6.2M
> 169M   4% /opt
> /dev/vda11   92M  5.6M
> 81M   7% /tmp
> /dev/vda7   751M  493M  219M
> 70% /usr
> /dev/vda9   563M  282M  252M
> 53% /var
> /dev/vda10  184M  176M 0
> 100% /var/log
>
> Even after rotating and clearing the logs, the usage of /var/log is only
> 4.7M so I am not too sure where is the 176M coming from.
>
> root@r-4155-VM:/var/log# du -h
> 1.0K./samba
> 3.8M./sysstat
> 68K ./apt
> 7.0K./apache2
> 3.0K./fsck
> 317K./installer/cdebconf
> 809K./installer
> 1.0K./news
> 12K ./lost+found
> 1.0K./ntpstats
> 4.7M.
>
> /dev/vda10  184M  175M  475K
> 100% /var/log
>
> I would need to clear the logs and do a "service dnsmasq restart"
> regularly to make the VR functioning again, which is quite troublesome.
>
> Any advice is greatly appreciated.
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>

ACS 4.8.1: Virtual router - /var/log always full

2016-11-27 Thread Cloud List

Dear all,

After upgrading to ACS 4.8.1, one of our virtual router's /var/log
partition is always full and used up quite fast. This caused the VR not
able to serve DHCP and password requests from VM.

root@r-4155-VM:/var/log# df -h
Filesystem  Size  Used Avail
Use% Mounted on
rootfs  461M  158M  280M
37% /
udev 10M 0   10M
0% /dev
tmpfs25M  236K   25M
1% /run
/dev/disk/by-uuid/30c81d3d-ee9f-4a88-81c1-5f349b22ba1d  461M  158M  280M
37% /
tmpfs   5.0M 0  5.0M
0% /run/lock
tmpfs   157M 0  157M
0% /run/shm
/dev/vda173M   23M   47M
33% /boot
/dev/vda692M  5.6M   81M
7% /home
/dev/vda8   184M  6.2M  169M
4% /opt
/dev/vda11   92M  5.6M   81M
7% /tmp
/dev/vda7   751M  493M  219M
70% /usr
/dev/vda9   563M  282M  252M
53% /var
/dev/vda10  184M  176M 0
100% /var/log

Even after rotating and clearing the logs, the usage of /var/log is only
4.7M so I am not too sure where is the 176M coming from.

root@r-4155-VM:/var/log# du -h
1.0K./samba
3.8M./sysstat
68K ./apt
7.0K./apache2
3.0K./fsck
317K./installer/cdebconf
809K./installer
1.0K./news
12K ./lost+found
1.0K./ntpstats
4.7M.

/dev/vda10  184M  175M  475K
100% /var/log

I would need to clear the logs and do a "service dnsmasq restart" regularly
to make the VR functioning again, which is quite troublesome.

Any advice is greatly appreciated.

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Trillian test result (tid-465)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 33609 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1753-t465-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Test completed. 44 look ok, 4 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 519.61 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1361.55 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 558.02 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcp_opts | `Failure` | 31.39 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 36.19 | 
test_password_server.py
ContextSuite context=TestSnapshotRootDisk>:teardown | `Error` | 61.67 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 356.02 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 141.43 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 558.18 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 320.93 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 714.53 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 880.93 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 1079.91 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 20.64 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 110.88 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 110.97 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 20.27 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.23 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.18 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.27 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 10.63 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 432.40 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.17 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 221.34 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 130.72 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 258.50 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.05 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 36.72 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.04 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 15.23 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 25.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 30.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 110.81 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.05 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.13 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.10 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.10 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 70.58 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 196.66 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 198.84 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 121.50 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 173.98 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 166.48 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 259.21 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.07 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.60 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.11 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 21.22 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 115.96 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.07 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.11 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.16 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_scale_vm | Success | 5.19 | test_scale_vm.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 65.42 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 50.35 |

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multipl...

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
  
Trillian test result (tid-464)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 28781 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1659-t464-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 44 look ok, 4 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 920.96 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcp_opts | `Failure` | 21.30 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 406.87 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 255.61 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 296.51 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_04_extract_template | `Error` | 5.12 | test_templates.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 161.06 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 91.39 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 321.88 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 285.18 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 574.36 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 528.63 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1394.26 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 565.28 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1318.80 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.88 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.55 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.50 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.36 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.23 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.21 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.33 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.83 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 711.70 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 283.93 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.65 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 81.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.81 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.92 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.18 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.35 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 85.73 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.19 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 60.56 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.80 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.80 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.81 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.75 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.92 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.90 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.27 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.54 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 16.38 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.68 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.09 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.12 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.17 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.20 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 40.34 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 30.34 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.18 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1710: CLOUDSTACK-9538: FIX failure in Deleting Snapshot Fr...

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver-65sp1) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1710: CLOUDSTACK-9538: FIX failure in Deleting Snapshot Fr...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-65sp1


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
Trillian test result (tid-459)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 40501 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1754-t459-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 47 look ok, 2 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_router_dhcp_opts | `Failure` | 21.25 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 507.16 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 859.69 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 237.39 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 415.09 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 708.11 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 696.18 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1630.74 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 751.38 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 805.81 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1472.58 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 31.35 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 65.74 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 105.24 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.22 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.31 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 63.80 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 539.89 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.21 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 232.25 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 177.00 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.78 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 273.64 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 27.04 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 185.30 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 81.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 337.38 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 15.26 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.13 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 141.09 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 241.99 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 294.16 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.63 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.68 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 202.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 203.97 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.20 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.57 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 26.24 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 121.91 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.19 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 181.18 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 186.27 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 25.25 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.67 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup |

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Trillian test result (tid-460)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 27593 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1753-t460-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 46 look ok, 2 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 860.01 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcp_opts | `Failure` | 21.11 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
ContextSuite context=TestVPCRedundancy>:teardown | `Error` | 523.86 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 161.07 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 61.26 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 241.09 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 270.77 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 604.41 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 518.75 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1412.27 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 554.38 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1079.39 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.57 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.43 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.45 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.38 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.29 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.20 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.74 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 721.83 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 309.49 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.63 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.44 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 35.92 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.89 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 126.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 5.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.30 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 110.91 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.19 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.10 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 80.68 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.56 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 164.53 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.41 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 103.23 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 136.62 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.43 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 0.98 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 2.95 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.23 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.96 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.13 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.19 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 40.35 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 30.30 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.17 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.08 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.71 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 60.53 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success |

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1710: CLOUDSTACK-9538: FIX failure in Deleting Snapshot Fr...

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
  
Trillian test result (tid-462)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 26823 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1710-t462-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 46 look ok, 2 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 873.43 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcp_opts | `Failure` | 20.89 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 144.25 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 65.83 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 229.84 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 278.50 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 542.32 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 499.58 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1400.05 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 532.40 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1273.02 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 10.36 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.30 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.35 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.34 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.26 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.16 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.26 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.79 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 651.67 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 282.83 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.70 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 30.62 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.68 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.69 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 110.75 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.22 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.08 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.16 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 45.34 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.56 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.55 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.51 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.00 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 106.78 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.20 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 2.92 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 16.05 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.42 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.03 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.06 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.11 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.13 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 40.27 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 30.22 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.13 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.03 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.67 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 60.39 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 0.85 | test_routers.py
test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.49 | test_routers.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Migrate master to Spring 4.x

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Migrate master to Spring 4.x

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Trillian test result (tid-455)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 38676 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1753-t455-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 46 look ok, 2 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 525.88 | test_vpc_vpn.py
ContextSuite context=TestRVPCSite2SiteVpn>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_vpc_vpn.py
ContextSuite context=TestVPCRedundancy>:teardown | `Error` | 745.79 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 166.18 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 469.97 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 816.99 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 740.72 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1562.73 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 767.28 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 757.69 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1453.67 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 30.80 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 95.73 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 105.22 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.13 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.23 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 64.86 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 529.17 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 285.28 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 234.66 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 201.19 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 163.67 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 232.44 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.01 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 27.07 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 106.38 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.07 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 25.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 427.38 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.05 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 20.23 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.08 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.15 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 140.79 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 231.35 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 273.53 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.54 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.30 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 201.45 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 178.29 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 0.98 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 4.17 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 36.04 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 96.96 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.02 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.08 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.12 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 160.94 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 166.49 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 25.18 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.03 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.62 | test_routers.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
Trillian test result (tid-457)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 34573 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1754-t457-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Test completed. 44 look ok, 5 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 580.13 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1392.53 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 618.62 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | `Failure` | 26.34 | test_snapshots.py
test_router_dhcp_opts | `Failure` | 31.36 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 102.40 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
ContextSuite context=TestRVPCSite2SiteVpn>:teardown | `Error` | 708.58 | 
test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 321.49 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 156.76 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 577.68 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 331.04 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 770.18 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 950.10 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 1032.20 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.70 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 90.83 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 95.87 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 30.43 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.24 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.20 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.28 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 11.20 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 388.79 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.25 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 220.02 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.84 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 303.68 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.83 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 185.31 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.04 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 5.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 10.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.22 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 30.29 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 141.02 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.05 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.31 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.18 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 85.71 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 226.64 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 234.75 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 141.52 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 153.95 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 166.81 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 173.96 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.24 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.50 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.11 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 126.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.09 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.10 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_scale_vm | Success | 5.24 | test_scale_vm.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 65.50 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 55.45 | test_routers.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1762: CLOUDSTACK-9595 Transactions are not getting retried...

2016-11-27 Thread rafaelweingartner

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1762
  
@serg38, it is great that you found one of the methods that cause the 
deadlock problem 
âcom.cloud.host.dao.HostDaoImpl.findAndUpdateDirectAgentToLoad(long, Long, 
long)â.

This method surely is problematic. I would first start asking, (i) does it 
need to manually open a transaction (at line 512)? Isnât that the goal of 
â@DBâ annotation? (ii) what is the objective of the method 
(âfindAndUpdateDirectAgentToLoadâ)? It is looking too complicated, with too 
many accesses to the DB.

The method âresetHostsâ at line 517 looks for hosts that are 
âmanagedâ by the current MS and are âDisconnectedâ to mark them as 
unmanaged by any MS. That means, it updates the âmanagementServerId = nullâ 
of hosts marked as âDisconnectâ.

Would not it be better to have a specific method/transaction only for the 
aforementioned process?  If we extract that chunk of code to an isolated 
method, could not we have an atomic access to the DB without locking? âupdate 
set managementServerId = null from hosts where â¦â¦â; If the method is 
isolated I do not see reasons for locks here.

A little further, there is another method which could be isolated, lines 
527 â 546. This block of code looks for clusters being managed by the current 
MS. Then, it searches for hosts of clusters that are managed by the current MS, 
which are not being managed by the current MS (or not managed at all?)? I did 
not understand that because I have seen in some other piece of code that we 
have a balancing approach; meaning that, we try to balance the number of hosts 
managed by an MS.  This piece of code seems to remove the balancing process.

Then, at line 551 and forward (if the number of hosts is less than the 
limit), it tries to look for hosts of clusters not being managed by any MS. 
This block could also be an isolated one. And again, we might be able to do 
this process without using locks.

My final comment, even if we choose not to refactor and improve this piece 
of code, there is one thing that is very strange for me. The method 
âfindAndUpdateDirectAgentToLoadâ  is annotated with â@DBâ, and also 
opens and tries to manage a transaction manually. Then, we have all of the 
pieces of code I mentioned, all of them call other methods that also are 
annotated with â@DBâ. Can this cause a problem?

For instance, when I use Spring, methods from a service layer (the place 
where I configure my pattern of transactions) call one another, they will all 
use/share the same transaction opened when the first method of the service 
layer was called, unless specified otherwise. How will it work here in ACS?



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

rVPC

2016-11-27 Thread Paul Angus

Hey Wilder,

I hope that you are well.

We've found that the rVPC seems to use the same MAC address on the public 
interface of both the Master and Backup rVPC nodes - was this by design?

Kind regards,

Paul Angus


paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@murali-reddy can you help investigate the failure with 
`test_router_dhcp_opts`


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
Trillian test result (tid-458)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 27752 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1754-t458-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 48 look ok, 1 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_router_dhcp_opts | `Failure` | 21.08 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 160.40 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 86.29 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 275.81 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 283.10 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 569.94 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 583.33 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1377.41 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 668.25 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 810.79 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1359.28 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.65 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.40 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.47 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.46 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.27 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.21 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.31 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 45.89 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 723.86 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 328.93 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 27.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.34 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.97 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 130.87 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 130.91 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.32 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 80.69 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.08 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.34 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.14 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 65.62 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 136.54 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 168.35 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 136.68 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 138.70 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 136.89 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 138.85 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.37 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.48 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.27 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 242.64 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.06 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.15 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.19 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 40.34 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 30.32 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 15.19 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.60 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 105.77 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 1.16 | test_routers.py
test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.62 | test_routers.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@serg38 I looked across PRs merged since 23rd Nov, and found an issue with 
fwd-merging a PR that caused an issue in CsDhcp.py. I've fixed the issue now, 
and kicked test runs. So, far it looks promising. We'll have results soon. 
Thanks.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

2016-11-27 Thread Rohit Yadav

All,

We're closer to cutting RCs now, we've only two outstanding PRs from John's 
list and an additional fix critical for VR (#1659):

  * 1579 (fix conflicts + commit squash; regression tests pending)
  * 1765 (code review feedback + regression tests pending)
  * 1659 (code review + regression tests pending)

Of this list, PR 1579 is a new feature on master/4.10 and can be merged post 
4.10.0.0 release and is not blocking the release work.

I've merged few UI/translation related PRs today ahead of the 4.10.0.0 release 
on master branch, and I've kicked tests for the 4.8[1], 4.9 [2] and master 
(4.10) [3] branches to evaluate current health of these branches.

Regards.

[1] 4.8: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
[2] 4.9: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
[3] 4.10/master: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754



From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 24 November 2016 12:24:00
To: John Burwell; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status


All,


We've managed to review/merge few PRs, but we still have five more to go after 
which we should be able to cut RCs. We've following PRs pending from previous 
list:


* 4.10.0.0
  * 1545 (code review comments; regression tests pending)
  * 1577 (Jenkins failures; regression tests pending)
  * 1579 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
  * 1580 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
* 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, 4.10.0.0

* 1765 (squash commits; code review feedback; regression tests pending)

On 4.8 [1], 4.9 [2] most of the integration tests are passing with exception to 
certain intermittent failures on xenserver and vmware.
On 4.10/master [3], some new errors related to volumes and snapshots were found 
on xenserver [3] and they are under investigation.

In addition to the on-going effort to get all green on these smoke tests across 
4.8, 4.9 and master branches, I've started looking into some component tests, 
especially identifying those that can be run against simulator and can added to 
Travis (and pass within 50 mins) [4]. As a general request, if you're writing a 
new integration test that can finish rather quickly (say less than 20 mins) 
please consider adding them to smoke tests.

I would request your help in above PRs and other on-going QA efforts. Thanks 
everyone.

Regards.

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
[2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
[3] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
[4] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1755

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
@shapeblue






rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

From: John Burwell
Sent: 17 November 2016 11:53:33
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Rohit Yadav
Subject: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status

All,

I apologize for being relatively radio silent.  We have mage good progress 
towards getting RCs out for 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, and 4.10.0.0.  On 31 October 
2016, we 17 outstanding PRs to be merged.  As of today (17 Nov 2016), we have 9 
PRs to merge with pending one potential blocker/critical defect fix:

* 4.10.0.0 (+ all 4.8.2.0 and 4.9.1.0 PRs)
* 1542 (regression tests running)
  * 1545 (code review comments; regression tests pending)
  * 1577 (Jenkins failures; regression tests pending)
  * 1579 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
  * 1580 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending)
* 4.9.1.0 (+ all 4.8.2.0 PRs)
  * 1681 (test failures to resolve)
  * 1684 (working out the proper fix to an upgrade issue)
* 4.8.2.0
* 1745 (test failures to resolve)
* 1765 (squash commits; code review feedback; regression tests pending)

Once all PRs are merged, we will re-execute the tests on each of the release 
branches.  Rohit has opened tracking PRs for 4.8 [1], 4.9 [2], and master [3] 
to understand the state of the release branches as we continue to merge PRs.

Thank you to everyone who has reviewed, tested, and merged PRs.  I am hopeful 
that we are very close to cutting these RCs.

Thanks again,
-John

[1]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
[2]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
[3]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754



[cid:f8j1YS5W0uYjO02tPIl0AShapeBlue_logo_sml_png]

John Burwell
s: +1 (571) 403-2411 | d: +44 (20) 3603 0542
e: john.burw...@shapeblue.com  |  w: www.shapeblue.com  |  t:  @shapeblue
a: 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK



Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services 
India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in 
Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd 
is a

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multipl...

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multipl...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1791: CLOUDSTACK-9622 Localisation for 'Project' la...

2016-11-27 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1791


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1791: CLOUDSTACK-9622 Localisation for 'Project' label on ...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1791
  
LGTM, tested manually similar changes as seen in screenshots from 
@milamberspace 
I'll proceed with merging this now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1789: Update L10N files from Transifex (2016-11-27)...

2016-11-27 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1789


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1789: Update L10N files from Transifex (2016-11-27) for th...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1789
  
Thanks @milamberspace I'll proceed with the merge now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Fault percentage value of CPU usage in Cloud Platform

2016-11-27 Thread Sergey Levitskiy

First of all, if you don’t have support for CCP you need to strongly consider 
migrating to ACP. This community doesn’t have access to CCP code so we have 
very limited way to assist you.
In any case looking at the log you provided it seems you have 2 cluster: one 
(cluster id =5) that crossed your allocation threshold for capacity CPU. The 
other cluster (id=1) simply has no host matching host tag of your service 
offering (“WinL”) so that cluster can’t be allocated either.
Can you execute this SQL query and post results back:

SELECT 
`c`.`uuid` AS `cluster_uuid`,
`c`.`id` AS `cluster_id`,
`c`.`name` AS `cluster_name`,
`d`.`uuid` AS `zone_uuid`,
`d`.`name` AS `zone_name`,
IF((`capacity`.`capacity_type` = 1),
'cpu',
'ram') AS `type`,
((SUM(`capacity`.`used_capacity`) + 
SUM(`capacity`.`reserved_capacity`)) + 0) AS `used_capacity`,
SUM((`capacity`.`total_capacity` * `overcommit`.`value`)) AS 
`total_capacity`,
FORMATSUM(`capacity`.`used_capacity`) + 
SUM(`capacity`.`reserved_capacity`)) + 0) / SUM((`capacity`.`total_capacity` * 
`overcommit`.`value`))),
2) AS `utilization`,
(CASE (SELECT 
COUNT(0)
FROM
`cluster_details` `details`
WHERE
((`details`.`cluster_id` = `capacity`.`cluster_id`)
AND (`details`.`name` = 
'cluster.cpu.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold')))
WHEN
1
THEN
(CASE
WHEN
ISNULL((SELECT 
`details`.`value`
FROM
`cluster_details` `details`
WHERE
((`details`.`cluster_id` = 
`capacity`.`cluster_id`)
AND (`details`.`name` = 
'cluster.cpu.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold'
THEN
(SELECT 
`config`.`value`
FROM
`configuration` `config`
WHERE
(`config`.`name` = 
'cluster.cpu.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold'))
ELSE (SELECT 
`details`.`value`
FROM
`cluster_details` `details`
WHERE
((`details`.`cluster_id` = `capacity`.`cluster_id`)
AND (`details`.`name` = 
'cluster.cpu.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold')))
END)
ELSE (SELECT 
`config`.`value`
FROM
`configuration` `config`
WHERE
(`config`.`name` = 
'cluster.cpu.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold'))
END) AS `threshold`,
(CASE (SELECT 
COUNT(0)
FROM
`cluster_details` `details`
WHERE
((`details`.`cluster_id` = `capacity`.`cluster_id`)
AND (`details`.`name` = 'cpuOvercommitRatio')))
WHEN
1
THEN
(CASE
WHEN
ISNULL((SELECT 
`details`.`value`
FROM
`cluster_details` `details`
WHERE
((`details`.`cluster_id` = 
`capacity`.`cluster_id`)
AND (`details`.`name` = 
'cpuOvercommitRatio'
THEN
(SELECT 
`config`.`value`
FROM
`configuration` `config`
WHERE
(`config`.`name` = 'cpuOvercommitRatio'))
ELSE (SELECT 
`details`.`value`
FROM
`cluster_details` `details`
WHERE
((`details`.`cluster_id` = `capacity`.`cluster_id`)
AND (`details`.`name` = 'cpuOvercommitRatio')))
END)
ELSE (SELECT 
`config`.`value`
FROM
`configuration` `config`
WHERE
(`config`.`name` = 'cpuOvercommitRatio'))
END) AS `overprovisioning`
FROM
`op_host_capacity` `capacity`
JOIN `cluster_details` `overcommit` ON ((`overcommit`.`cluster_id` = 
`capacity`.`cluster_id`)))
JOIN `cluster` `c` ON ((`c`.`id` =

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1789: Update L10N files from Transifex (2016-11-27) for th...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1789
  
LGTM, did manual tests. Cycled between various lang options, don't see any 
failures.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1710: CLOUDSTACK-9538: FIX failure in Deleting Snapshot Fr...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
  
Failure wrt debian pkg was due to an env issue.
@blueorangutan test



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1710: CLOUDSTACK-9538: FIX failure in Deleting Snapshot Fr...

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1771: CLOUDSTACK-9611: Dedicating a Guest VLAN range to Pr...

2016-11-27 Thread rajesh-battala

Github user rajesh-battala commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771
  
Gone through the patch. LGTM.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1592: CLOUDSTACK-9416 (Bug in ACS master GUI) : Ena...

2016-11-27 Thread prashanthvarma

Github user prashanthvarma closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1592


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1592: CLOUDSTACK-9416 (Bug in ACS master GUI) : Enabling S...

2016-11-27 Thread prashanthvarma

Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1592
  
Closing this PR as its shadow PR #1785 got merged into 4.9/master


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1789: Update L10N files from Transifex (2016-11-27) for th...

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1789
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-264


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multipl...

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-263


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1784: CS-505: Marvin test to check VR internal DNS Service

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1784
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-265


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Migrate master to Spring 4.x

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-266


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1710: CLOUDSTACK-9538: FIX failure in Deleting Snapshot Fr...

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-262


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt 
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@blueorangutan test matrix


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-261


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1791: CLOUDSTACK-9622 Localisation for 'Project' label on ...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1791
  
LGTM.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1791: CLOUDSTACK-9622 Localisation for 'Project' la...

2016-11-27 Thread milamberspace

GitHub user milamberspace opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1791

CLOUDSTACK-9622 Localisation for 'Project' label on the top of Web UI

[Base 4.9, forward to 4.10 too]

The label Project isn't localized.

Sample with chinese UI:
Current:

![selection_457](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3995882/20648086/56e54cfe-b495-11e6-9e78-3590a24302d1.png)

With this PR:

![selection_456](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3995882/20648088/6090960a-b495-11e6-9dc0-eb24e16dcdc6.png)

cc @rhtyd 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/milamberspace/cloudstack 
CLOUDSTACK-9622_Fix_Project_Not_L10N

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1791.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1791


commit 0522d0df934e9dea13315735ef5f111ec610b510
Author: Milamber 
Date:   2016-11-27T10:47:25Z

CLOUDSTACK-9622 Localisation for 'Project' label on the top of Web UI




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Migrate master to Spring 4.x

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1638: CLOUDSTACK-9456: Migrate master to Spring 4.x

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1790: CLOUDSTACK-9622 Localisation for 'Project' la...

2016-11-27 Thread milamberspace

Github user milamberspace closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1790


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1772: Fix template sync for region store.

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1772
  
@syed can you add a JIRA id for this and use that in the git commit summary.
LGTM.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1790: CLOUDSTACK-9622 Localisation for 'Project' label on ...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1790
  
LGTM.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1784: CS-505: Marvin test to check VR internal DNS Service

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1784
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1784: CS-505: Marvin test to check VR internal DNS Service

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1784
  
@abhinandanprateek can you check if `test_router_dns.py` is similar to your 
test, you may also move your test case in that test file? Thanks.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1784: CS-505: Marvin test to check VR internal DNS Service

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1784
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1789: Update L10N files from Transifex (2016-11-27) for th...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1789
  
Thanks @milamberspace can you also use that JIRA id in the git commit 
summary such as:
`CLOUDSTACK-: one liner...`


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1787: fix syntax error introduced in CsDhcp.py

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1787
  
Thanks @murali-reddy I've already fixed this with #1788 and kicking tests 
on PR #1753 #1754 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1788: systemvm: Fix regression from fwd-merging PR #1766

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1788
  
Notes: centos6 build failed due to an intermittent unit test that fails 
sometimes when clocks are skewed: `  
HypervisorUtilsTest.checkVolumeFileForActivityTest:68 Didn't block long enough, 
expected at least 2000 and got 1061`



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-260


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1778: CLOUDSTACK-9613: Unable to set NAT rules on a...

2016-11-27 Thread nitin-maharana

Github user nitin-maharana closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1778


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1788: systemvm: Fix regression from fwd-merging PR #1766

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1788
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-259


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1787: fix syntax error introduced in CsDhcp.py

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1787
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-258


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1789: Update L10N files from Transifex (2016-11-27) for th...

2016-11-27 Thread milamberspace

Github user milamberspace commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1789
  
@rhtyd Done: CLOUDSTACK-9621

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9621


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1789: Update L10N files from Transifex (2016-11-27) for th...

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1789
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1789: Update L10N files from Transifex (2016-11-27) for th...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1789
  
@milamberspace thanks for the PR, can you get a JIRA id for this. I'll kick 
one manual test to see that UI is broken.

@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1778: CLOUDSTACK-9613: Unable to set NAT rules on any inte...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1778
  
Thanks @nitin-maharana a similar fix was merged with #1785 since it was for 
4.9. Please close this PR.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1789: Update L10N files from Transifex (2016-11-27)...

2016-11-27 Thread milamberspace

GitHub user milamberspace opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1789

Update L10N files from Transifex (2016-11-27) for the new release 4.10.0.0

I've check manually the correct display of the UI foreach language.

Don't forget to merge this before 4.10 release.

cc @jburwell @rhtyd 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/milamberspace/cloudstack 
L10N-update-Master-20161124

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1789.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1789


commit 340d15d82f5abafdbc1da595d37165c2728798e8
Author: Milamber <milam...@apache.org>
Date:   2016-11-27T09:44:44Z

Improve conversion Transifex's JSON format to CloudStack JS

commit 38e31ec0e0b64bfa09ec33077fc79ffd65c813a6
Author: Milamber <milam...@apache.org>
Date:   2016-11-27T09:47:46Z

Update L10N resource files with 4.10 strings from Transifex (20161127)




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1785: CLOUDSTACK-9416 : Enabling Static NAT on an a...

2016-11-27 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1785


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1785: CLOUDSTACK-9416 : Enabling Static NAT on an associat...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1785
  
LGTM, this fixes the same issue as #1778. Since this is a pure UI change, 
manual testing with screenshot confirm the fix. I'll move with the merge now. 
The failure at Travis is not due to this change but intermittent/env issue.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multipl...

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1710: CLOUDSTACK-9538: FIX failure in Deleting Snapshot Fr...

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1710: CLOUDSTACK-9538: FIX failure in Deleting Snapshot Fr...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multipl...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1752: [4.8] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
  
@murali-reddy can you check why `test_router_dhcp_opts 
(test_router_dhcphosts.py)` failed, this test is failing intermittently on 4.9, 
master as well.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1788: systemvm: Fix regression from fwd-merging PR ...

2016-11-27 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1788


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1788: systemvm: Fix regression from fwd-merging PR #1766

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1788
  
Merging this based on internal tests, the issue was tuple did not include 
`lease`. Merging this now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1788: systemvm: Fix regression from fwd-merging PR ...

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1788

systemvm: Fix regression from fwd-merging PR #1766

Fixes merge conflict issue incorrectly fixed during a fwd-merge in 825935
from PR #1766.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack 4.9-fix-merge-pr1766

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1788.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1788


commit cc72e4da64e28ecf948246684233bbe8cfa46ab6
Author: Rohit Yadav 
Date:   2016-11-27T10:13:10Z

systemvm: Fix regression from 825935

Fixes merge conflict issue incorrectly fixed during a fwd-merge in 825935
from PR #1766

Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav 




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1788: systemvm: Fix regression from fwd-merging PR #1766

2016-11-27 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1788
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1788: systemvm: Fix regression from fwd-merging PR #1766

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1788
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1787: fix syntax error introduced in CsDhcp.py

2016-11-27 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1787
  
@murali-reddy a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1787: fix syntax error introduced in CsDhcp.py

2016-11-27 Thread murali-reddy

Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1787
  
@ blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

1 2 >

1 - 100 of 101 matches

Mail list logo