[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1794: added more guest os

[luhaijiao]

Github user luhaijiao commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794
  
can we have it too in 4.10 @karuturi 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1697: CLOUDSTACK-4858 Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafte...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1697
  
I think the conflicts were on VolumeOrchestrator.java and 
TemplateManagerImplTest.java


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

apidocs build failure

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi all,

All the apidocs builds[1] are failing after the recent java 8
change. Can anyone having access fix it? Or should we talk to
INFRA about it?

Error message:

[INFO]
-
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : [INFO]
-
[ERROR] javac: invalid target release: 1.8 Usage: javac use -help
for a list of possible options

[1] https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-apidocs-master/

Thanks

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

Re: GSoC projects

[Rajani Karuturi]

I added two:

CLOUDSTACK-8310 - commit to commit db upgrades and db version
control

CLOUDSTACK-9777 - decouple cloudstack UI

Thanks,

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On February 9, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Rafael Weingärtner
(rafaelweingart...@gmail.com) wrote:

Hi guys,
Do you find interesting integrating ACS with OpenID Connect
identity
providers?

Today ACS supports SAML; therefore, it can be used in federated
systems
that are created using Shibboleth or OpenAM. OpenID Connect is
an
alternative to SAML to create federations. Would you like to see
ACS
supporting OpenID Connect protocol?

I have been helping two students with their undergraduate
thesis. They are
creating an integration between ACS and OpenID Connect protocol
(it is an
authentication plugin, like the one created for SAML). It seems
that this
could be an interesting opportunity to push this integration
further and to
add another competitive advantage to ACS (BTW: OpenStack already
supports
OpenId Connect).

I could speak with them and work out their application with this
proposal.

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Rene Moser 
wrote:

On 02/08/2017 02:46 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote:

I want to propose another topic to relplace our old and crummy
console

with

a NoVNC console. Long time ago I developed a prototype and the
results

were

very promising [2]. I have opened a JIRA ticket for this as well
[1]

That would be AWESOME!

--
Rafael Weingärtner

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #844: [4.10] CLOUDSTACK-7985: assignVM in Advanced z...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/844


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #844: [4.10] CLOUDSTACK-7985: assignVM in Advanced zone wit...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/844
  
merging


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: GSoC projects

[Rafael Weingärtner]

Hi guys,
Do you find interesting integrating ACS with OpenID Connect identity
providers?

Today ACS supports SAML; therefore, it can be used in federated systems
that are created using Shibboleth or OpenAM. OpenID Connect is an
alternative to SAML to create federations. Would you like to see ACS
supporting OpenID Connect protocol?

I have been helping two students with their undergraduate thesis. They are
creating an integration between ACS and OpenID Connect protocol (it is an
authentication plugin, like the one created for SAML). It seems that this
could be an interesting opportunity to push this integration further and to
add another competitive advantage to ACS (BTW: OpenStack already supports
OpenId Connect).

I could speak with them and work out their application with this proposal.


On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Rene Moser  wrote:

>
>
> On 02/08/2017 02:46 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> > I want to propose another topic to relplace our old and crummy console
> with
> > a NoVNC console. Long time ago I developed a prototype and the results
> were
> > very promising [2]. I have opened a JIRA ticket for this as well [1]
>
> That would be AWESOME!
>



-- 
Rafael Weingärtner

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #844: [4.10] CLOUDSTACK-7985: assignVM in Advanced zone wit...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/844
  
Trillian test result (tid-807)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 34311 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr844-t807-kvm-centos7.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_router_nics.py
Test completed. 47 look ok, 2 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 869.41 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 340.78 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 155.48 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 66.21 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 250.93 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 277.36 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 520.18 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 518.31 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1416.80 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 548.16 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1285.50 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 156.67 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 156.42 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 161.53 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 156.38 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 155.81 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 151.29 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 156.36 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 89.64 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 712.28 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.25 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 95.73 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 158.70 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 242.59 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.69 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.98 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 130.88 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.85 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.18 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.34 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 50.93 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.16 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.18 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 20.31 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.62 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 133.57 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.59 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.50 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.78 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.68 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.27 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.27 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.73 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.14 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.20 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.34 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 30.28 | test_routers.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1727: CLOUDSTACK-9539: Support changing Service offering f...

[rafaelweingartner]

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1727
  
Great job. 
I just noticed two possible cases that might be a good idea to write a test 
case for.

Test case for method “createAndPersistVMSnapshot” to check when an 
exception for line 388 is thrown. The same for method 
“changeUserVmServiceOffering” when an exception for line 742 is thrown.

The idea is that, if those conditions are met, an exception should be 
accepted; so, it is a test case that prepares the code in a way that those 
conditions are satisfied and an exception is thrown.

I do not know if my explanation was intelligible. If you did not understand 
what I meant, please call me.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1727: CLOUDSTACK-9539: Support changing Service offering f...

[nvazquez]

Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1727
  
Hi @rafaelweingartner! Thanks a lot for your review! As usual, your 
comments are really valuable.
I agree with you on the points you've mentioned and I've refactored the PR 
based on them, mostly on the unit tests for the new methods which I have missed 
out.
About, `test_vm_snapshots.py` it passed successfully, please let me know if 
it is needed to post results and I'll rebase 4.9 branch and re ran the test.
Thanks again for taking the time to review the PR!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: PRs for 4.10

[Will Stevens]

@Daan: In order for the tests to pass with 1741, the tests have to be run
with the SystemVM from the PR being used.

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer



On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> About 1741, I started the packaging, Will but saw Boris making a
> remark about the system VMs. I'll look into that and start the tests.
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Will Stevens 
> wrote:
> > I would like to get 1741(strongswan) in, but I need to get Trillian to
> run
> > against it with a system vm built from my pr. I have done a CI in bubble
> > and it came back clean, but would like confirmation through Trillian as
> > well.
> >
> > On Feb 7, 2017 2:17 PM, "Milamber"  wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> And this PR for 4.9 but need to be foward to 4.10 too.
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1929
> >>
> >> 2 LGTM
> >> CI green
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07/02/2017 13:07, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>> If you know of any PRs which meet the below criteria, please mail them
> to
> >>> me.
> >>> 1. No open questions.
> >>> 2. Has two LGTMs
> >>> 3. Has CI test results.
> >>>
> >>> ~Rajani
> >>> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: [Vmware] Optimize vm expunge proces...

[nvazquez]

Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905
  
@karuturi thanks!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

[swill]

Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
  
@DaanHoogland I don't think this will work.  I think you have to manually 
specify a SystemVM template built from this PR in order for the tests to work.  
I don't think a SystemVM from this PR is used by default.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1747: CLOUDSTACK-9574: Redesign storage views

[serg38]

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1747
  
@rafaelweingartner Do we get you LGTM?
@DaanHoogland @rhtyd Can we kick off tests for this?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1697: CLOUDSTACK-4858 Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafte...

[nathanejohnson]

Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1697
  
@karuturi do you happen to remember which files conflicted?  I seem to 
remember 
VolumeOrchestrator.java having some changes in master that weren't in 4.9.  
I've looked over all of the files that were touched in this PR and it all looks 
good to me.  Thanks for merging this!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [PROPOSAL] Extra DHCP options

[Sergey Levitskiy]

I personally like this option. This way you can obtain all DHCP options at once 
very fast and manipulate them as you see fit in the respective module
   - A second option could be that we store all the DHCP options in *one*
   key,value pair.

As key we pick a specific value say; "extra_dhcp_options" and as value: we
decode all the dhcp options (code + value) as json. This makes updating
DHCP options on a nic more complex.

 

Re: [PROPOSAL] Extra DHCP options

[Sigert GOEMINNE]

Hi Syed,

We specified storing the DHCP options in the nic_details table as
alternatives in the FS.
There are however some downsides to this approach:

   - Storing each DHCP option as key (=dhcp code),value (=dhcp value) pair:

In this case nobody else can use numeric keys in nic_details because they
would be "reserved" for DHCP options. Secondly, we would need to retrieve
all nic_details (also details non related to DHCP) when listing the DHCP
options of a nic.


   - We could add a prefix like '"dhcp:"' to each DHCP code and use that as
  a key:

Then we could extend the DAO class to include a search criteria which only
returns the details starting with a certain prefix (in this example
"dhcp:").


   - A second option could be that we store all the DHCP options in *one*
   key,value pair.

As key we pick a specific value say; "extra_dhcp_options" and as value: we
decode all the dhcp options (code + value) as json. This makes updating
DHCP options on a nic more complex.

An extra table, specific for DHCP options, seems to be a cleaner way?

Kind regards,
Sigert



*Sigert Goeminne*
Software Development Engineer

*nuage* networks.net
Copernicuslaan 50
2018 Antwerp
Belgium




On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:

> Hi Sigert,
>
> Instead of creating a new table `nic_extra_dhcp_option` is it possible to
> use the table `nic_options` The *_details tables are usually used as a
> key-value store to store details about the various secondary params. You
> can have a look at host_details table for example. There is already
> boilerplate code (like NicDetailsDao & NicDetailsVO etc) in Cloudstack for
> doing this. You could just use that instead.
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Sigert GOEMINNE <
> sigert.goemi...@nuagenetworks.net> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > We would like to add support for extra DHCP options to Nuage in
> CloudStack.
> >
> > We want to add an extra optional parameter for extra DHCP options to the
> > deployVm, updateVM and addNic API, and pass this to the plugin, using a
> new
> > method on the DHCP Service provider interface.
> >
> > Please take a look at the FS [1], and jira ticket [2].
> >
> > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/C
> > loudStack+extra+DHCP+option+support
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9776
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > *Sigert Goeminne*
> > Software Development Engineer
> >
> > *nuage* networks.net
> > Copernicuslaan 50
> > 2018 Antwerp
> > Belgium
> >
>

Re: GSoC projects

[Rene Moser]

On 02/08/2017 02:46 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> I want to propose another topic to relplace our old and crummy console with
> a NoVNC console. Long time ago I developed a prototype and the results were
> very promising [2]. I have opened a JIRA ticket for this as well [1]

That would be AWESOME!

Re: [PROPOSAL] Extra DHCP options

[Dustin Wright]

This is somewhat off topic, but related. I've always thought
ApacheCloudStack should come with a PXE server on the controller to boot
the hypervisors over the network. Automatic construction of the hypervisors
so there are no local disks would be really nice. I imagine DHCP attributes
could be a part of provisioning functionality. It would be really nice if
you just racked up servers and the local disks showed up as a storage
option, but there was no OS disk on the hypervisor to get jacked up. Later
those local disks could be federated later.

Dustin

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Syed Ahmed  wrote:

> Hi Sigert,
>
> Instead of creating a new table `nic_extra_dhcp_option` is it possible to
> use the table `nic_options` The *_details tables are usually used as a
> key-value store to store details about the various secondary params. You
> can have a look at host_details table for example. There is already
> boilerplate code (like NicDetailsDao & NicDetailsVO etc) in Cloudstack for
> doing this. You could just use that instead.
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Sigert GOEMINNE <
> sigert.goemi...@nuagenetworks.net> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > We would like to add support for extra DHCP options to Nuage in
> CloudStack.
> >
> > We want to add an extra optional parameter for extra DHCP options to the
> > deployVm, updateVM and addNic API, and pass this to the plugin, using a
> new
> > method on the DHCP Service provider interface.
> >
> > Please take a look at the FS [1], and jira ticket [2].
> >
> > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/C
> > loudStack+extra+DHCP+option+support
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9776
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > *Sigert Goeminne*
> > Software Development Engineer
> >
> > *nuage* networks.net
> > Copernicuslaan 50
> > 2018 Antwerp
> > Belgium
> >
>

RE: PRs for 4.10

[Daan Hoogland]

Rajani, I found 844 browsing through old wishes and I think it should go in. 
testing is underway but I don't know about the review and new test code yet.

daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531 VENetherlands
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] 
Sent: woensdag 8 februari 2017 07:28
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: PRs for 4.10

A small bugfix for IPv6 in Basic Networking: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1927

Would be great!

Wido

> Op 7 feb. 2017 om 14:08 heeft Rajani Karuturi  het 
> volgende geschreven:
> 
> Hi all,
> If you know of any PRs which meet the below criteria, please mail them 
> to me.
> 1. No open questions.
> 2. Has two LGTMs
> 3. Has CI test results.
> 
> ~Rajani
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #844: [4.10] CLOUDSTACK-7985: assignVM in Advanced zone wit...

[DaanHoogland]

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/844
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #844: [4.10] CLOUDSTACK-7985: assignVM in Advanced zone wit...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/844
  
@DaanHoogland a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1767: CLOUDSTACK-9457: Allow retrieval and modification of...

[nvazquez]

Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1767
  
@karuturi @rafaelweingartner thanks! I closed Jira ticket 9379


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

FINAL REMINDER: CFP for ApacheCon closes February 11th

[Rich Bowen]

Dear Apache Enthusiast,

This is your FINAL reminder that the Call for Papers (CFP) for ApacheCon
Miami is closing this weekend - February 11th. This is your final
opportunity to submit a talk for consideration at this event.

This year, we are running several mini conferences in conjunction with
the main event, so if you're submitting for one of those events, please
pay attention to the instructions below.

Apache: Big Data
* Event information:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apache-big-data-north-america
* CFP:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apache-big-data-north-america/program/cfp

Apache: IoT (Internet of Things)
* Event Information: http://us.apacheiot.org/
* CFP -
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america/program/cfp
(Indicate 'IoT' in the Target Audience field)

CloudStack Collaboration Conference
* Event information: http://us.cloudstackcollab.org/
* CFP -
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america/program/cfp
(Indicate 'CloudStack' in the Target Audience field)

FlexJS Summit
* Event information - http://us.apacheflexjs.org/
* CFP -
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america/program/cfp
(Indicate 'Flex' in the Target Audience field)

TomcatCon
* Event information - https://tomcat.apache.org/conference.html
* CFP -
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america/program/cfp
(Indicate 'Tomcat' in the Target Audience field)

All other topics and projects
* Event information -
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america/program/about
* CFP -
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america/program/cfp

Admission to any of these events also grants you access to all of the
others.

Thanks, and we look forward to seeing you in Miami!

-- 
Rich Bowen
VP Conferences, Apache Software Foundation
rbo...@apache.org
Twitter: @apachecon



(You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to a dev@ or
users@ list of some Apache Software Foundation project. If you do not
wish to receive email from these lists any more, you must follow that
list's unsubscription procedure. View the headers of this message for
unsubscription instructions.)

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #844: [4.10] CLOUDSTACK-7985: assignVM in Advanced zone wit...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/844
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-475


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [PROPOSAL] Extra DHCP options

[Syed Ahmed]

Hi Sigert,

Instead of creating a new table `nic_extra_dhcp_option` is it possible to
use the table `nic_options` The *_details tables are usually used as a
key-value store to store details about the various secondary params. You
can have a look at host_details table for example. There is already
boilerplate code (like NicDetailsDao & NicDetailsVO etc) in Cloudstack for
doing this. You could just use that instead.

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Sigert GOEMINNE <
sigert.goemi...@nuagenetworks.net> wrote:

> All,
>
> We would like to add support for extra DHCP options to Nuage in CloudStack.
>
> We want to add an extra optional parameter for extra DHCP options to the
> deployVm, updateVM and addNic API, and pass this to the plugin, using a new
> method on the DHCP Service provider interface.
>
> Please take a look at the FS [1], and jira ticket [2].
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/C
> loudStack+extra+DHCP+option+support
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9776
>
> Kind regards,
>
> *Sigert Goeminne*
> Software Development Engineer
>
> *nuage* networks.net
> Copernicuslaan 50
> 2018 Antwerp
> Belgium
>

RE: GSoC projects

[Daan Hoogland]

Thanks Said,

I stopped using the consider.. label btw. It didn't add value in hindsight so I 
added GSoC2017 to yours as well

daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531 VENetherlands
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Syed Ahmed [mailto:sah...@cloudops.com] 
Sent: woensdag 8 februari 2017 14:46
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: sachin patil 
Subject: Re: GSoC projects

I want to propose another topic to relplace our old and crummy console with a 
NoVNC console. Long time ago I developed a prototype and the results were very 
promising [2]. I have opened a JIRA ticket for this as well [1]

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9778
[2] https://github.com/cloudops/go-xen-console-proxy

Thanks,
-Syed

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> FYI,
>
> I am adding the label “considerForGSoC” to issues in jira. Please do 
> the same if you want topropose anything.
>
> Verzonden vanuit Mail
> voor KVM-guests
>
> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531 VENetherlands 
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Re: GSoC projects

[Syed Ahmed]

I want to propose another topic to relplace our old and crummy console with
a NoVNC console. Long time ago I developed a prototype and the results were
very promising [2]. I have opened a JIRA ticket for this as well [1]

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9778
[2] https://github.com/cloudops/go-xen-console-proxy

Thanks,
-Syed

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> FYI,
>
> I am adding the label “considerForGSoC” to issues in jira. Please do the
> same if you want topropose anything.
>
> Verzonden vanuit Mail
> voor KVM-guests
>
> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531 VENetherlands
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #844: [4.10] CLOUDSTACK-7985: assignVM in Advanced zone wit...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/844
  
@DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #844: [4.10] CLOUDSTACK-7985: assignVM in Advanced zone wit...

[DaanHoogland]

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/844
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1898: CLOUDSTACK-8862: Lock on volume before attemp...

[ProjectMoon]

Github user ProjectMoon closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1898


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1898: CLOUDSTACK-8862: Lock on volume before attempting to...

[ProjectMoon]

Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1898
  
Closed in favor of #1900 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[PROPOSAL] Extra DHCP options

[Sigert GOEMINNE]

All,

We would like to add support for extra DHCP options to Nuage in CloudStack.

We want to add an extra optional parameter for extra DHCP options to the
deployVm, updateVM and addNic API, and pass this to the plugin, using a new
method on the DHCP Service provider interface.

Please take a look at the FS [1], and jira ticket [2].

[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/C
loudStack+extra+DHCP+option+support
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9776

Kind regards,

*Sigert Goeminne*
Software Development Engineer

*nuage* networks.net
Copernicuslaan 50
2018 Antwerp
Belgium

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1900: CLOUDSTACK-8862: Introduced new state attachi...

[anshul1886]

Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1900


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1900: CLOUDSTACK-8862: Introduced new state attachi...

[anshul1886]

GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1900

CLOUDSTACK-8862: Introduced new state attaching for volume. This will…

… make sure that other attach operation on same volume will fail 
gracefully without calling access calls for managed storage like SolidFire

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/anshul1886/cloudstack-1 CLOUDSTACK-8862

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1900.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1900


commit 40d1a82bd9b7e799f269fcfbdfc4ec5923c189b2
Author: Anshul Gangwar 
Date:   2017-01-10T11:40:28Z

CLOUDSTACK-8862: Introduced new state attaching for volume. This will make 
sure that other attach operation on same volume will fail gracefully without 
calling access calls for managed storage like SolidFire




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1929: [4.9] CLOUDSTACK-9770: fix missing ip routes ...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1929


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

old wishes

[Daan Hoogland]

H devs,

I am busy closing all wishes that haven’t been  discussed for more then 2 
years. Please feel free to reopen any that you feel are still relevant. Going 
through them one by one turned out to be to time consuming.

Verzonden vanuit Mail voor 
KV-guests


daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531 VENetherlands
@shapeblue
  
 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
  
@DaanHoogland a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

[DaanHoogland]

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

GSoC projects

[Daan Hoogland]

FYI,

I am adding the label “considerForGSoC” to issues in jira. Please do the same 
if you want topropose anything.

Verzonden vanuit Mail voor 
KVM-guests

daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531 VENetherlands
@shapeblue
  
 

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin issue #41: 50% of the doc strings are translated into ...

[lmrv]

Github user lmrv commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/41
  
Thanks @asfgit for merging.
There is an "Permission Denied

You don't have the proper permissions to view this page. Please contact the 
owner of this project to request permission."
on 
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.8/ 
website when asking for french pages.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1697: CLOUDSTACK-4858 Honors the snapshot.backup.ri...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1697


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1644: Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafter configu...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1644


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1697: CLOUDSTACK-4858 Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafte...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1697
  
@nathanejohnson @kiwiflyer  There were some conflicts while merging to 
master. I went ahead and resolved as they are minor conflicts. Please verify 
that everything is fine on master.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---