[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @rhtyd @jburwell Thank you for reviewing and helping us merge this PR, much appreciated !! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @rhtyd I have resolved all your comments and updated the PR. Moreover, all the tests that are run on this PR are now fully successful (blueorangutan tests + added Marvin tests in this PR). --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @rhtyd Here are the latest test results of the added Marvin tests that test the changes in this PR. 1) Marvin test run: nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/test_nuage_static_nat.py Test Nuage VSP Public IP Range creation and deletion ... === TestName: test_01_nuage_StaticNAT_public_ip_range | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Nuage Underlay (underlay networking) enabled Public ... === TestName: test_02_nuage_StaticNAT_underlay_public_ip_range | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Isolated networks with different combinations of ... === TestName: test_03_nuage_StaticNAT_isolated_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP VPC networks with different combinations of Static ... === TestName: test_04_nuage_StaticNAT_vpc_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality for Isolated network by ... === TestName: test_05_nuage_StaticNAT_isolated_networks_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality for VPC network by ... === TestName: test_06_nuage_StaticNAT_vpc_network_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with different Egress ... === TestName: test_07_nuage_StaticNAT_acl_rules_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with VM NIC operations by ... === TestName: test_08_nuage_StaticNAT_vm_nic_operations_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with VM migration by ... === TestName: test_09_nuage_StaticNAT_vm_migration_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with network restarts by ... === TestName: test_10_nuage_StaticNAT_network_restarts_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 16073.682s OK Test results: [results.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/612037/results.txt) [runinfo.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/612038/runinfo.txt) 2) Marvin test run: nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/test_nuage_source_nat.py Test Nuage VSP Isolated networks with different combinations of ... === TestName: test_01_nuage_SourceNAT_isolated_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP VPC networks with different combinations of Source ... === TestName: test_02_nuage_SourceNAT_vpc_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality for Isolated network by ... SKIP: Configured Nuage VSP SDN platform infrastructure does not support underlay networking: skipping test Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality for VPC network by ... SKIP: Configured Nuage VSP SDN platform infrastructure does not support underlay networking: skipping test Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with different Egress ... SKIP: Configured Nuage VSP SDN platform infrastructure does not support underlay networking: skipping test Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with VM NIC operations by ... SKIP: Configured Nuage VSP SDN platform infrastructure does not support underlay networking: skipping test Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with VM migration by ... SKIP: Configured Nuage VSP SDN platform infrastructure does not support underlay networking: skipping test Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with network restarts by ... SKIP: Configured Nuage VSP SDN platform infrastructure does not support underlay networking: skipping test -- Ran 8 tests in 1658.814s OK (SKIP=6) Test results: [results.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/612040/results.txt) [runinfo.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/612041/runinfo.txt) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 Trillian test result (tid-423) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 27940 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1580-t423-kvm-centos7.zip Test completed. 49 look ok, 0 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 160.12 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 61.09 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 245.94 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 270.39 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 582.17 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 533.14 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1279.01 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Success | 599.95 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 767.31 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1315.35 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.67 | test_volumes.py test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.44 | test_volumes.py test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.47 | test_volumes.py test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.32 | test_volumes.py test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.28 | test_volumes.py test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.20 | test_volumes.py test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py test_02_attach_volume | Success | 75.43 | test_volumes.py test_01_create_volume | Success | 652.46 | test_volumes.py test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 329.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.75 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 36.07 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.85 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.90 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.36 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 151.12 | test_templates.py test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.28 | test_templates.py test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.21 | test_templates.py test_01_create_template | Success | 60.75 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 162.01 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 193.88 | test_ssvm.py test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.63 | test_ssvm.py test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 134.39 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.99 | test_ssvm.py test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 164.45 | test_ssvm.py test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.20 | test_ssvm.py test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 4.76 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.15 | test_snapshots.py test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 205.18 | test_service_offerings.py test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.06 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.13 | test_secondary_storage.py test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.21 | test_secondary_storage.py test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.31 | test_routers.py test_08_start_router | Success | 40.38 | test_routers.py test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.18 | test_routers.py test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.08 | test_routers.py test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.05 | test_routers.py test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.70 | test_routers.py test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 70.62 | test_routers.py test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 0.93 | test_routers.py test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.51 | test_routers.py test_router_dns_guestipquery | Success | 82.82 | test_router_dns.py
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-242 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 Thanks @prashanthvarma I'll rekick some tests and awaiting for your test results. @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580
@rhtyd I have resolved and responded to your comments, and updated the PR
accordingly. Moreover, I have just kicked on our internal regression tests
(including the added Marvin tests in this PR that test the code changes in this
PR).
Regarding the above failures, all of them are either test environment
(intermittent errors) and are not related to the code changes in this PR.
1) TestRVPCSite2SiteVpn - Failing to download the template in the
setupClass.
Exception("Template download failed exception")
2) test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes - Failing to create privategateway
in the VPC as the specified vlan is already in use.
errorText:Network with vlan vlan://926 already exists in zone 1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 Trillian test result (tid-395) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 27905 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1580-t395-kvm-centos7.zip Test completed. 45 look ok, 3 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 184.14 | test_privategw_acl.py ContextSuite context=TestRVPCSite2SiteVpn>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_vpc_vpn.py ContextSuite context=TestVPCRedundancy>:teardown | `Error` | 520.17 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 155.01 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 71.31 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 259.79 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 551.66 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 515.06 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1446.78 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Success | 558.87 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 749.94 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1366.96 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.56 | test_volumes.py test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.40 | test_volumes.py test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.47 | test_volumes.py test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.30 | test_volumes.py test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.25 | test_volumes.py test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.20 | test_volumes.py test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.34 | test_volumes.py test_02_attach_volume | Success | 74.55 | test_volumes.py test_01_create_volume | Success | 721.57 | test_volumes.py test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 309.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.74 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 41.06 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.84 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 126.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.33 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 85.76 | test_templates.py test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.10 | test_templates.py test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.18 | test_templates.py test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.36 | test_templates.py test_01_create_template | Success | 80.69 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.74 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.79 | test_ssvm.py test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.50 | test_ssvm.py test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.28 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.75 | test_ssvm.py test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.77 | test_ssvm.py test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 0.99 | test_ssvm.py test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 2.96 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 21.35 | test_snapshots.py test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 234.54 | test_service_offerings.py test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.13 | test_secondary_storage.py test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.20 | test_secondary_storage.py test_09_reboot_router | Success | 40.35 | test_routers.py test_08_start_router | Success | 30.32 | test_routers.py test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.17 | test_routers.py test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.70 | test_routers.py test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 60.53 | test_routers.py
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 LGTM - based on our Internal regression testing and code review on the latest code in this PR. @rhtyd @jburwell --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-215 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @jburwell I have squashed all the commits in this PR into one logical commit as suggested by you. Moreover, I have briefly investigated the above failed test "test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes" and here are my findings: 1) The above test case fails during establishment of SSH connection to the VM via its public IP (SSH connection failed to setup, timeout error) 2) It looks like a test code (and/or) test environment issue as similar SSH tests in other test cases in the same test script "test_vpc_redundant.py" pass. 3) The only difference between this failing test case and other test cases being the number of retries while establishing SSH connection to the VM via its public IP (0 and 5 retries respectively). Thus, most likely, increasing the number of retries in the failing test case will fix this issue on your test environment. 4) This test case fails at the same point across different PRs (e.g. PR #1577 and PR #1579 ) Conclusion: The above test "test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes" is failing due to test code (and/or) test environment issues. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 Trillian test result (tid-346) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 25383 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1580-t346-kvm-centos7.zip Test completed. 47 look ok, 1 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 854.81 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 145.38 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 66.12 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 250.93 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 269.98 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 560.06 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 529.09 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1326.70 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Success | 553.12 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1275.78 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.67 | test_volumes.py test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.52 | test_volumes.py test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.45 | test_volumes.py test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.32 | test_volumes.py test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.29 | test_volumes.py test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.21 | test_volumes.py test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.28 | test_volumes.py test_02_attach_volume | Success | 43.59 | test_volumes.py test_01_create_volume | Success | 716.01 | test_volumes.py test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 273.57 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.73 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 35.91 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 126.04 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.82 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.31 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 65.59 | test_templates.py test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.12 | test_templates.py test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.18 | test_templates.py test_01_create_template | Success | 70.56 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.63 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.14 | test_ssvm.py test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.25 | test_ssvm.py test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 103.11 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.42 | test_ssvm.py test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.22 | test_ssvm.py test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 0.93 | test_ssvm.py test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 2.85 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.11 | test_ssvm.py test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 16.22 | test_snapshots.py test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.59 | test_service_offerings.py test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.12 | test_secondary_storage.py test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.17 | test_secondary_storage.py test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.29 | test_routers.py test_08_start_router | Success | 25.24 | test_routers.py test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.18 | test_routers.py test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.05 | test_routers.py test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.59 | test_routers.py test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 55.48 | test_routers.py test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 0.84 | test_routers.py test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.46 | test_routers.py test_router_dns_guestipquery | Success | 76.77 | test_router_dns.py
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @jburwell a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @prashanthvarma please squash all commits down into one logical commit for the enhancement. Multiple commits for the same feature muddy the long term history. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-163 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @jburwell a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @jburwell @rhtyd I have re-based this PR with latest master, and we now only have two commits (1 dev + 1 test). Jenkins and Travis are green now, you can now kick off regression tests on this PR via blueorangutan. Meanwhile, we are re-running our local regression tests on the latest build. Let me know, if you need anything from our side. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @prashanthvarma #1578 has been merged. Can you rebase this PR and squash the commits? Once that is done and Jenkins and Travis are green, I will kick regression tests via blueorganutan. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @rhtyd @jburwell As I mentioned in the earlier comments, this feature PR has dependency with our other open feature PR #1578. Thus, we re-based this PR (2 commits) on top of that PR (2 commits) as we don't know which PR will go in first. One option: Once PR #1578 has been merged into master, we will re-base this PR with latest master. Thus, we will have only two commits in this PR. Let me know, if you want us to do this in a different way. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @prashanthvarma I still see 4 different commits, can you squash them? At least squash the similar ones together, so we can effectively get two commits one around the feature and one around the marvin test. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @jburwell @rhtyd I have rebased this PR with latest master, and squashed commits. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @jburwell @rhtyd Ok, we will rebase the PR, and let you know here. Moreover, we can re-run the added Marvin tests and share the results after the re-base. This PR has dependency from our other open PR #1578 . Thus, we included that PR commits in this PR. Generally, we have two commits in a PR, one for dev and one for test (Marvin). Let me know, if you want us to do this in a different way. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @nlivens I would like to get this PR merged for 4.10.0.0. I will code review in the next few days. In the meantime, please rebase this PR to pick up the latest Marvin enhancements/fixes, as well as, resolve conflicts, and squash the commits. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 Marvin test code PEP8 & PyFlakes compliance: CloudStack$ CloudStack$ pep8 test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/.py CloudStack$ CloudStack$ pyflakes test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/.py CloudStack$ @remibergsma Our Marvin test code is now truly PEP8 & PyFlakes compliant. Moreover, we have extended our custom base class "test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/nuageTestCase.py" support for optimal creation of cloudstack objects at setUpClass level in order to re-use/test them across different testcases. Thus, conserving test resources (i.e. reduced test created objects and time). Note: We have updated with these changes our other outstanding PRs as well. Let me know, if you have any other questions for me. Thank you for your valuable review and suggestions !! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @remibergsma As a common team practice, we just happened to agree upon with this line length :). Agree, we should make our Marvin code truly PEP8 compliant as you suggested, and update our Marvin code accordingly. I ran all our Marvin tests with this PR as it involves Nuage VSP support for underlay networking besides our default overlay networking. Moreover, we perform quite a few VM deployments (reboots, migrations, expunges, etc.) and traffic tests (e.g. SSH into VM and then wget from the Internet) in these tests. Finally, the CentOS guest VM template that we use for our internal regressions takes a bit longer to start/stop guest VMs (rich feature set and programmes). Here are some metrics: VM deployements: 63 Isolated network creations: 57 SSH into VMs (reconnects) = 82 Note: Unless required, we don't always run all of our Marvin tests in a single Marvin run. Anyhow, we actively use nosetests features such as tags/attributes to run subset of these tests in the following scenarios: 1) simulator tests (required hardware=false) 2) feature specific tests 3) basic (smoke) tests 4) E2E (traffic) tests Note: Once we have considerable number of tests in our plugins/nuagevsp directory, we are also thinking about creating sub-directories as well (e.g. component, smoke, etc.). Let me know, your thoughts on this, and if you have any other questions for me. Thank you for your valuable review and suggestions !! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user remibergsma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 PEP8 recommends max line length of 79, why bump it to 150? That doesn't help in readability IMO. And yes, I know many other tests are crappy formatted too. But since you state it's PEP8 complaint I suggest to do it fully :-) Does that test take >7 hours? Wow. Do you have any metrics on why that takes so long? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 Marvin test code PEP8 & PyFlakes compliance: CloudStack$ CloudStack$ pep8 --max-line-length=150 test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/*.py CloudStack$ CloudStack$ pyflakes test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/*.py CloudStack$ Validations: 1) Nuage VSP underlay infra. Marvin test run: nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp Test user data and password reset functionality with Nuage VSP SDN plugin ... === TestName: test_nuage_UserDataPasswordReset | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Isolated networks with different combinations of Source NAT service providers ... === TestName: test_01_nuage_SourceNAT_isolated_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP VPC networks with different combinations of Source NAT service providers ... === TestName: test_02_nuage_SourceNAT_vpc_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality for Isolated network by performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: test_03_nuage_SourceNAT_isolated_network_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality for VPC network by performing (wget) traffic tests to the Internet ... === TestName: test_04_nuage_SourceNAT_vpc_network_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with different Egress Firewall/Network ACL rules by performing (wget) ... === TestName: test_05_nuage_SourceNAT_acl_rules_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with VM NIC operations by performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: test_06_nuage_SourceNAT_vm_nic_operations_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with VM migration by performing (wget) traffic tests to the Internet ... === TestName: test_07_nuage_SourceNAT_vm_migration_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with network restarts by performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: test_08_nuage_SourceNAT_network_restarts_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Public IP Range creation and deletion ... === TestName: test_01_nuage_StaticNAT_public_ip_range | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Nuage Underlay (underlay networking) enabled Public IP Range creation and deletion ... === TestName: test_02_nuage_StaticNAT_underlay_public_ip_range | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Isolated networks with different combinations of Static NAT service providers ... === TestName: test_03_nuage_StaticNAT_isolated_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP VPC networks with different combinations of Static NAT service providers ... === TestName: test_04_nuage_StaticNAT_vpc_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality for Isolated network by performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: test_05_nuage_StaticNAT_isolated_networks_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality for VPC network by performing (wget) traffic tests to the Internet ... === TestName: test_06_nuage_StaticNAT_vpc_network_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with different Egress Firewall/Network ACL rules by performing (wget) ... === TestName: test_07_nuage_StaticNAT_acl_rules_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with VM NIC operations by performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: test_08_nuage_StaticNAT_vm_nic_operations_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with VM migration by performing (wget) traffic tests to the Internet ... === TestName: test_09_nuage_StaticNAT_vm_migration_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with network restarts by performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: test_10_nuage_StaticNAT_network_restarts_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP VPC Offering with different combinations of LB service providers ... === TestName: test_01_nuage_internallb_vpc_Offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP VPC Network Offering with and without Internal LB service ... === TestName: test_02_nuage_internallb_vpc_network_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP VPC Networks with and without Internal LB service ... === TestName: test_03_nuage_internallb_vpc_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP VPC Internal LB functionality with different combinations of Internal LB rules ... === TestName: test_04_nuage_internallb_rules | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP VPC Internal LB functionality by performing
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @bvbharatk IMHO, above Marvin test failure is not related to the code on this PR. Let me know, if you want us to do any actions from our side. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 208 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=72 Failed=1 Skipped=3 _Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0 **Failed tests:** * test_vm_life_cycle.py * test_10_attachAndDetach_iso Failing since 2 runs **Skipped tests:** test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3 test_static_role_account_acls test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm **Passed test suits:** test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py test_affinity_groups_projects.py test_portable_publicip.py test_vpc_vpn.py test_over_provisioning.py test_global_settings.py test_scale_vm.py test_service_offerings.py test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py test_routers.py test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py test_snapshots.py test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py test_login.py test_list_ids_parameter.py test_public_ip_range.py test_multipleips_per_nic.py test_regions.py test_affinity_groups.py test_network_acl.py test_pvlan.py test_volumes.py test_nic.py test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py test_resource_detail.py test_secondary_storage.py test_disk_offerings.py --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 Our Marvin test code PEP8 & PyFlakes compliance: CloudStack$ CloudStack$ pep8 --max-line-length=150 test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/.py CloudStack$ CloudStack$ pyflakes test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/.py CloudStack$ Validations: 1) Underlay infra (PAT & FIP2UL) Marvin test run: nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg plugins/nuagevsp/test_nuage_source_nat.py Test results: Test Nuage VSP Isolated networks with different combinations of Source NAT service providers ... === TestName: test_01_nuage_SourceNAT_isolated_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP VPC networks with different combinations of Source NAT service providers ... === TestName: test_02_nuage_SourceNAT_vpc_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality for Isolated network by performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: test_03_nuage_SourceNAT_isolated_network_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality for VPC network by performing (wget) traffic tests to the Internet ... === TestName: test_04_nuage_SourceNAT_vpc_network_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with different Egress Firewall/Network ACL rules by performing (wget) ... === TestName: test_05_nuage_SourceNAT_acl_rules_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with VM NIC operations by performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: test_06_nuage_SourceNAT_vm_nic_operations_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with VM migration by performing (wget) traffic tests to the Internet ... === TestName: test_07_nuage_SourceNAT_vm_migration_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Source NAT functionality with network restarts by performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: test_08_nuage_SourceNAT_network_restarts_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 8 tests in 13360.858s OK Marvin test run: nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg plugins/nuagevsp/test_nuage_static_nat.py Test results: Test Nuage VSP Public IP Range creation and deletion ... === TestName: test_01_nuage_StaticNAT_public_ip_range | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Nuage Underlay (underlay networking) enabled Public IP Range creation and deletion ... === TestName: test_02_nuage_StaticNAT_underlay_public_ip_range | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Isolated networks with different combinations of Static NAT service providers ... === TestName: test_03_nuage_StaticNAT_isolated_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP VPC networks with different combinations of Static NAT service providers ... === TestName: test_04_nuage_StaticNAT_vpc_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality for Isolated network by performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: test_05_nuage_StaticNAT_isolated_networks_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality for VPC network by performing (wget) traffic tests to the Internet ... === TestName: test_06_nuage_StaticNAT_vpc_network_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with different Egress Firewall/Network ACL rules by performing (wget) ... === TestName: test_07_nuage_StaticNAT_acl_rules_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with VM NIC operations by performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: test_08_nuage_StaticNAT_vm_nic_operations_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with VM migration by performing (wget) traffic tests to the Internet ... === TestName: test_09_nuage_StaticNAT_vm_migration_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP Static NAT functionality with network restarts by performing (wget) traffic tests to the ... === TestName: test_10_nuage_StaticNAT_network_restarts_traffic | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 9472.468s OK 2) Overlay Infra (Source & Static NAT) Marvin test run: nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg plugins/nuagevsp/test_nuage_source_nat.py Test results: Test Nuage VSP Isolated networks with different combinations of Source NAT service providers ... === TestName: test_01_nuage_SourceNAT_isolated_networks | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Nuage VSP VPC networks with different combinations of Source NAT service providers ... ===
