[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
LGTM. The one failing test is due to environment issue, I've fixed it and 
will send a PR shortly.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
yes. I am merging this now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@rhtyd @karuturi I think we are good to go on this PR now. Do you agree?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Trillian test result (tid-178)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 25671 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1642-t178-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 48 look ok, 0 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_oobm_zchange_password | `Failure` | 20.50 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 175.25 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 66.25 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 255.94 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 310.18 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 541.03 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 515.16 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1322.44 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 559.41 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 755.94 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1296.27 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 16.10 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.42 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.67 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.35 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.26 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.21 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.31 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 45.61 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 735.31 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 268.64 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.76 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.94 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.88 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.84 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.33 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 90.80 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.17 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.10 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.15 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 40.45 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 131.83 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.88 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.76 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.61 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.84 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 138.72 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.18 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.36 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.16 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.26 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 242.72 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.09 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.12 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.16 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.19 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 45.42 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 35.35 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.16 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.74 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 60.55 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 1.21 | test_routers.py
test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.69 | test_routers.py
   

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Any way to easily just re-run test_05_stop_ssvm and test_07_reboot_ssvm?

I'm not sure how this PR would cause such failures. The only changed Java 
code does the following:

* Validates IOPS parameters in a certain situation when creating a new 
System Offering. (should not apply here)

* For managed storage, when the storage-cleanup thread runs, attempts to 
remove the remaining SR. If this fails, the exception is logged and processing 
continues as usual. (should not apply here)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@karuturi @mike-tutkowski the oobm related error was an env issue, the 
vpc/vr related failures are know (and fixes are on its way). I'm not sure what 
to make of the ssvm/storage related failures.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@blueorangutan @rhtyd How are we on this PR? are the failures related? Or 
can I go ahead and merge this?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Trillian test result (tid-164)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 38976 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1642-t164-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 44 look ok, 4 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 188.44 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_oobm_zchange_password | `Failure` | 20.52 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Failure` | 121.17 
| test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 496.76 | test_vpc_vpn.py
ContextSuite context=TestRVPCSite2SiteVpn>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_vpc_vpn.py
ContextSuite context=TestSnapshotRootDisk>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 166.82 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 375.66 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 768.11 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 693.88 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1560.40 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 699.93 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 679.90 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1381.37 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 26.03 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 70.62 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 105.30 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.21 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.32 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 63.84 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 510.29 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.25 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 224.32 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 161.33 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.74 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 274.05 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.89 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 76.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.23 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 5.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 266.78 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 15.27 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.17 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 130.93 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 261.94 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 233.93 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.68 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.65 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 176.93 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 239.06 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.26 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.60 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 130.05 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.13 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.18 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 161.04 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 151.02 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 25.32 | test_routers.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Trillian test result (tid-162)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 33772 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1642-t162-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Test completed. 46 look ok, 2 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 527.22 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1367.28 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 575.62 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 555.51 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 336.70 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 141.84 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 529.06 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 301.29 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 729.18 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 872.62 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 1106.86 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 16.25 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 81.13 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 101.11 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 20.42 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.29 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.28 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.36 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 10.80 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 434.13 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.34 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 224.62 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.77 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 279.07 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.85 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.43 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.50 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 10.20 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 30.31 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 156.38 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.21 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.14 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.20 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 60.65 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 226.86 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 259.32 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 151.76 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 174.39 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 166.86 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 139.46 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.46 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 36.74 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 126.25 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.19 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_scale_vm | Success | 5.26 | test_scale_vm.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 85.73 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 50.63 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 15.27 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.07 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
2016-10-23 19:32:49,315 - CRITICAL - EXCEPTION: test_05_stop_ssvm: 
['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', '  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 369, in run\ntestMethod()\n', 
'  File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_ssvm.py", line 733, in test_05_stop_ssvm\n
self.waitForSystemVMAgent(ssvm_response.name)\n', '  File 
"/marvin/tests/smoke/test_ssvm.py", line 81, in waitForSystemVMAgent\nraise 
Exception("Timed out waiting for SSVM agent to be Up")\n', 'Exception: Timed 
out waiting for SSVM agent to be Up\n']
2016-10-23 19:41:26,319 - CRITICAL - FAILED: test_07_reboot_ssvm: 
['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', '  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 369, in run\ntestMethod()\n', 
'  File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_ssvm.py", line 920, in test_07_reboot_ssvm\n  
  self.test_03_ssvm_internals()\n', '  File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_ssvm.py", 
line 440, in test_03_ssvm_internals\n"Check for warnings in tests"\n', '  
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 553, in assertEqual\n
assertion_func(first, second, msg=msg)\n', '  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 546, in _baseAssertEqual\n
raise self.failureException(msg)\n', 'AssertionError: Check for warnings in 
tests\n']

Off hand I'm not sure how this PR would cause these failures. Perhaps we 
could run these tests again?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
==
FAIL: Create a redundant VPC with two networks with two VMs in each network
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 582, in 
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL
self.do_vpc_test(False)
  File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 727, in do_vpc_test
self.check_ssh_into_vm(vm.get_vm(), vm.get_ip(), expectFail=expectFail, 
retries=retries)
  File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 571, in 
check_ssh_into_vm
self.fail("Failed to SSH into VM - %s" % 
(public_ip.ipaddress.ipaddress))
AssertionError: Failed to SSH into VM - 10.1.34.104

That might be a problem with the test.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Tests out-of-band management change password feature ... === TestName: 
test_oobm_zchange_password | Status : FAILED ===
FAIL

That might be a problem with the test.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Trillian test result (tid-163)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 25326 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1642-t163-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 46 look ok, 2 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 367.82 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | `Failure` | 355.37 | test_ssvm.py
test_oobm_zchange_password | `Failure` | 20.30 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | `Error` | 370.57 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 159.16 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 55.75 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 224.90 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 263.39 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 565.10 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 524.24 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1319.89 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 557.64 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 800.81 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.40 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.26 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.34 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.22 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.22 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.15 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.20 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.71 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 750.46 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 292.63 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.01 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.38 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 35.57 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.72 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.59 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 135.73 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.05 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.12 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.08 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.07 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 40.32 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 136.34 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.42 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.78 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 161.63 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.28 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 2.89 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.07 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 10.89 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.47 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.02 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.07 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.10 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.12 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 55.43 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 25.20 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.11 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.02 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.59 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 65.38 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 0.90 | test_routers.py
test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.47 | 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt 
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@blueorangutan test matrix


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Looks like re-pushing the commit did the trick, @rhtyd. I think we are good 
to go here.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@rhtyd I changed the SHA and re-pushed the commit. Hopefully that will 
clear up Travis.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-79


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
LGTM. @mike-tutkowski can you check why Travis failed?
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[koushik-das]

Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@mike-tutkowski If the LGTMs are there, this can get merged. There are lot 
of comments so difficult to go through all of them.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Just following up on this one. Is there any pending work item that remains 
or are we able to merge? Thanks!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@jburwell Excellent...closing and re-opening the ticket fixed the CI issue.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Closing and re-opening the PR fixed the Travis issue.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
I still got a weird Travis failure, so I decided to close and re-open this 
PR.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Travis, which was failing for a similar reason for #1600, passed, so I will 
(once again) change the commit SHA and re-push. In fact, while I'm at it, I'll 
rebase it against the latest from master before re-pushing.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@jburwell @mike-tutkowski  looks like marvin fails to get installed 
properly, one of the dependency fails with following:

Command "/opt/python/2.7.10/bin/python2.7 -u -c "import setuptools, 
tokenize;__file__='/tmp/pip-build-wNNQnH/cryptography/setup.py';exec(compile(getattr(tokenize,
 'open', open)(__file__).read().replace('\r\n', '\n'), __file__, 'exec'))" 
install --record /tmp/pip-ELOxnP-record/install-record.txt 
--single-version-externally-managed --compile --user --prefix=" failed with 
error code 1 in /tmp/pip-build-wNNQnH/cryptography/

Feel free to try to fix it, else I'll open a new PR and see if it works 
with latest 4.9 and master branches, and fix anything necessary tomorrow. I'll 
keep you posted.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@rhtyd any ideas?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@jburwell I think it's Travis. I've changed the commit SHA twice now and it 
failed both times plus it fails with #1600, as well (even though I pushed that 
one multiple times, too). Not sure why it can't find nosetests.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@mike-tutkowski The Travis build is failing with the following error:

```
0.04s$ ./tools/travis/script.sh ${TESTS}
Running tests:  smoke/test_usage_events smoke/test_vm_life_cycle 
smoke/test_vm_snapshots smoke/test_volumes smoke/test_vpc_redundant 
smoke/test_vpc_router_nics smoke/test_vpc_vpn smoke/misc/test_deploy_vm 
smoke/misc/test_vm_ha smoke/misc/test_escalations_templates 
smoke/misc/test_vm_sync
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./tools/travis/xunit-reader.py", line 27, in 
import texttable
ImportError: No module named texttable
```

I don't know if that is due to a change in the PR or Travis just need to be 
re-kicked.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Travis issue?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@karuturi awaiting feature enhancement to blueorangutan which was delayed 
due to an medical emergency.  Also, I want to wait to perform further testing 
until #1692 is tested and merged as it fixes a number of smoke test errors.  
Tests for it are running now, and I expect it to be merged tomorrow (28 Sept 
2016).  I apologize for the wait.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@blueorangutan @jburwell any update on the tests?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Thanks for running that, @serg38!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[serg38]

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
LGTM testing on Vmware hardware. RHEL 6 management servers, ESX 5.5 and 6  
hypervisors, advanced networking
```
test DeployVM in anti-affinity groups for project ... === TestName: 
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup_in_project | Status : SUCCESS ===
test DeployVM in anti-affinity groups ... === TestName: 
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test Deploy Virtual Machine from ISO ... === TestName: 
test_deploy_vm_from_iso | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test deploy virtual machine with root resize ... === TestName: 
test_00_deploy_vm_root_resize | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test proper failure to deploy virtual machine with rootdisksize of 0 ... 
=== TestName: test_01_deploy_vm_root_resize | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test proper failure to deploy virtual machine with rootdisksize less than 
template size ... === TestName: test_02_deploy_vm_root_resize | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
Test to deploy vm with a first fit offering ... === TestName: 
test_deployvm_firstfit | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test deploy VMs using user concentrated planner ... === TestName: 
test_deployvm_userconcentrated | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test deploy VMs using user dispersion planner ... === TestName: 
test_deployvm_userdispersing | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test userdata as GET, size > 2k ... === TestName: test_deployvm_userdata | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
Test userdata as POST, size > 2k ... === TestName: 
test_deployvm_userdata_post | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test to create disk offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_disk_offering 
| Status : SUCCESS ===
Test to create  a sparse type disk offering ... === TestName: 
test_02_create_sparse_type_disk_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test to create  a sparse type disk offering ... === TestName: 
test_04_create_fat_type_disk_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test to update existing disk offering ... === TestName: 
test_02_edit_disk_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test to delete disk offering ... === TestName: test_03_delete_disk_offering 
| Status : SUCCESS ===
Test to ensure 4 default roles cannot be deleted ... SKIP: Dynamic 
Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test
Test to check role, role permissions and account life cycles ... SKIP: 
Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test
Test for role-rule enforcement in case of multiple mgmt servers ... SKIP: 
Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test
Test to ensure role in use cannot be deleted ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based 
API checker not enabled, skipping test
Tests normal lifecycle operations for roles ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based 
API checker not enabled, skipping test
Tests role update ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, 
skipping test
Tests that default four roles exist ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API 
checker not enabled, skipping test
Tests role update ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, 
skipping test
Tests role update when role is in use by an account ... SKIP: Dynamic 
Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test
Tests concurrent order updation of role permission ... SKIP: Dynamic 
Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test
Tests creation of role permission ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker 
not enabled, skipping test
Tests deletion of role permission ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker 
not enabled, skipping test
Tests listing of default role's permission ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API 
checker not enabled, skipping test
Tests order updation of role permission ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API 
checker not enabled, skipping test
test update configuration setting at zone level scope ... === TestName: 
test_UpdateConfigParamWithScope | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test guest vlan range dedication ... === TestName: 
test_dedicateGuestVlanRange | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test create public & private ISO ... === TestName: test_01_create_iso | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
Test Edit ISO ... === TestName: test_02_edit_iso | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test delete ISO ... === TestName: test_03_delete_iso | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test for extract ISO ... === TestName: test_04_extract_Iso | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
Update & Test for ISO permissions ... === TestName: test_05_iso_permissions 
| Status : SUCCESS ===
Test for copy ISO from one zone to another ... SKIP: Not enough zones 
available to perform copy template
Test delete ISO ... === TestName: test_07_list_default_iso | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
Test listing Volumes using 'ids' parameter ... === TestName: 
test_01_list_volumes | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test listing Templates using 'ids' parameter ... === TestName: 
test_02_list_templates | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test listing Snapshots using 'ids' parameter ... === TestName: 
test_03_list_snapshots | Status : SUCCESS ===
Test to 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Great!! Hopefully, we can merge this by Monday then. 
This is one of the good PRs we have with good description, screenshots, 
demo, new tests and test runs by author. (Thanks @mike-tutkowski) 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@karuturi discussing with @rhtyd being able to specify a list of additional 
component tests to blueorgantan on the test command.  Hopefully, we can get 
something together by tomorrow (23 Sept 2016).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
That is great. Let us wait for @blueorangutan to post the results.

There still is a pending request for 'system VM integration test suites 
(SSVM, CPVM, and VR)'


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@jburwell a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs56sp1, centos7 
mgmt + vmware55u3, ubuntu mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@blueorangutan test matrix


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@blueorangutan matrix


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@jburwell I never asked you to remove your -1.  I am not even trying to 
convince you to remove your -1. 
If Vmware + nfs is such an important combination, it should be the 
prerequisite for every PR not just this one. 
I do understand the necessity of quality(which why we started with PRs in 
the first place) and all that is said makes sense in an ideal(or atleast 
corporate) world. There is lot of difference between being technically 'hard' 
and monetarily 'hard'. 
Quality is not going to improve by just waiting on test results. It will 
only improve if we make such an effort to run tests.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@jburwell Let me run those tests next week (probably Monday) as I'm just 
about ready to head out on a flight to a customer site for an upcoming meeting 
and won't be back until the weekend. Thanks


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@mike-tutkowski I only see results for the new test suites for XenServer + 
Managed Storage.  Have you also run the entire smoke test suite with 
`require_hardware` set to `true`?  If so, could you please add the test results 
to the PR?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@karuturi I am not going to debate the commonality of VMware.  It is the 
market leader in the hypervisor space, and NFS is one of the most popular 
storage protocols used with it.  Like the general hypervisor market, we have a 
large portion of our user community that relies on VMware with NFS.  Therefore, 
I will not remove my -1 from this PR until the necessary regression tests have 
been run.

Generally speaking, quality is the primary driver for merging PRs.  
Selective test coverage (both in the number of tests run and diversity of 
environments tests are run against) is one of the largest quality issues we are 
currently working to address.  A test scenario being "hard" is not a valid 
reason to ignore it and move a PR forward.  Given that quality is the primary 
driver for the community, then PRs must wait to be adequately tested. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@jburwell 'most commonly deployed' - I doubt. 
As @blueorangutan is ready to test, we can wait. In general, waiting for 
test results on a configuration which no one has(Hardware is hard), just halts 
a PR with no further steps to do. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@karuturi VMware with NFS primary/secondary storage.  It is one of the most 
commonly deployed CloudStack configurations.  Therefore, I am -1 on merging 
this PR until this regression test is performed.

The good news is that blueorgangutan is now back online and will be able to 
run such a test shortly.  @rhtyd is working to address a VMware Ansible/Marvin 
bug.  We will kick a CentOS 7.2/VMware 5.5u3 smoke test/integration test run 
for this PR when it is ready.  I expect that it will addressed today (22 Sept 
2016).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@mike-tutkowski  and @jburwell I think nobody has the test configurations 
requested. There is no point waiting indefinitely on a configuration which 
nobody has or wants to test. Let wait for 2 more days and if no one responds, 
lets merge. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Thanks, Sergey!

On 9/21/16, 5:37 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy"  wrote:

@mike-tutkowski @nvazquez We can probably run it this week



On 9/21/16, 12:11 PM, "mike-tutkowski"  wrote:

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Thank you, @karuturi!

Does anyone know who can run the VMware test that @jburwell asked 
for? I can't due to this issue: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9144 (but perhaps someone is 
using an Advanced Zone and doesn't see the problem described in 9144).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have 
your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this 
feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, 
please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA 
ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[Sergey Levitskiy]

@mike-tutkowski @nvazquez We can probably run it this week



On 9/21/16, 12:11 PM, "mike-tutkowski"  wrote:

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Thank you, @karuturi!

Does anyone know who can run the VMware test that @jburwell asked for? 
I can't due to this issue: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9144 (but perhaps someone is 
using an Advanced Zone and doesn't see the problem described in 9144).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Thank you, @karuturi!

Does anyone know who can run the VMware test that @jburwell asked for? I 
can't due to this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9144 
(but perhaps someone is using an Advanced Zone and doesn't see the problem 
described in 9144).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
I already posted the results for that configuration(a comment form 
@cloudmonger with test results) its all good there.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@karuturi That config is actually one of the ones John is asking for. :)

Smoke test suite + system VM integration test suites (SSVM, CPVM, and VR) 
against XenServer using Unmanaged Storage for System VMs


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@mike-tutkowski sorry mike. 2.b(xen+unmanaged) is what I ran. I dont have 
others.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---