[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user serverchief commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 Hi @koushik-das I believe you missed a discussion on this a while back - when this was initially proposed and we were gathering community feedback. please read this thread http://markmail.org/message/dtsfb6crbtqx3xut It will explain why we are choosing this solution and how current VM HA in production is not meeting the needs. Thanks -ilya PS: we also gave community ample of opportunity to respond to our FS, this was almost 2 years in the making.. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @abhinandanprateek Initially I also thought that this is about host HA. But after reading the FS I had doubts and asked about the definition of "host HA". If you refer to the discussion on dev@, it was mentioned that "host HA" would trigger VM HA so that they are started on other hosts. This is the same as existing VM HA and I don't think we should refer to it as host HA. @rhtyd I had replied with some specific questions/comments on the discussion thread. I didn't see any responses on those. Basically I would like to see a clear definition of "host HA". When a host is HA'd what all should happen? If the definition provided is nothing but VM HA then the question comes why a new framework when the existing framework is already there. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @koushik-das sorry could not get back to you earlier as I was busy with other work. I've replied on the ML thread to address several queries [1] that lists the advantages of this host-ha framework over existing building blocks and I've explained why we needed to implement it. Please have at the reply, if you still have any reservations let us know on the ML thread, we'll get back to you. [1] http://markmail.org/message/k7oaqyv5mzmlvzhx Note: As stated earlier in the ML thread as well -- *this is not a new VM HA framework*, the framework implementation is agnostic of the host-specific HA-provider to allow any custom host-ha plugin to be developed that is specific to a hypervisor as each hypervisor may have their own specific tools/infra/algorithms to check resource (disk/vm etc) activities, including scope for future extentions for other HA-able resources. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @koushik-das I see that main issue is that this is being confused as VM HA framework. Will like to again add that this framework is not for VM-HA but for host HA. With this implementation of OOBM framework, Cloudstack is now in the position to control and HA a host. These developments helped us in putting together a Host HA framework. Only that while designing and coding we tried to keep it flexible so that later other entities that can be HAed can be added to the framework. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 There are open questions that I had asked in the dev@ list and haven't seen satisfactory answers to them. I am -1 on this feature till the need for a new VM HA framework is justified. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 Travis failed due to failure in the test ``test_ha_multiple_mgmt_server_owner...`, I'll have a look shortly --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @rhtyd there seems to be a conflict for this merge, I'm currently running tests and will keep you posted --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 Trillian test result (tid-963) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 34953 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1960-t963-kvm-centos7.zip Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_ha_kvm_agent.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_hostha_simulator.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_templates.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py Test completed. 49 look ok, 3 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 874.51 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 330.43 | test_privategw_acl.py test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 0.04 | test_snapshots.py test_ha_list_providers | `Error` | 0.02 | test_hostha_simulator.py test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 170.43 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 66.20 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 260.69 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 277.21 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 548.46 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 527.13 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1330.72 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Success | 559.52 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1286.51 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 157.14 | test_volumes.py test_08_resize_volume | Success | 156.39 | test_volumes.py test_07_resize_fail | Success | 156.44 | test_volumes.py test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 156.36 | test_volumes.py test_05_detach_volume | Success | 155.84 | test_volumes.py test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 151.22 | test_volumes.py test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 156.28 | test_volumes.py test_02_attach_volume | Success | 124.18 | test_volumes.py test_01_create_volume | Success | 711.49 | test_volumes.py test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.19 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.65 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 158.72 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 277.88 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 31.69 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 30.92 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.86 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.85 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.35 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 40.45 | test_templates.py test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.09 | test_templates.py test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.31 | test_templates.py test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.13 | test_templates.py test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.14 | test_templates.py test_01_create_template | Success | 25.34 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.72 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.91 | test_ssvm.py test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.57 | test_ssvm.py test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.59 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.74 | test_ssvm.py test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.64 | test_ssvm.py test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.18 | test_ssvm.py test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.41 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.13 | test_snapshots.py test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.66 | test_service_offerings.py test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_edit_service_offering | Success |
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-600 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @borisstoyanov copy that, done --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @rhtyd PRs 2003 and 2011 got merged, could you please rebase against master so it'll pick up the fixes. Once we package I'll continue with the verification on the physical hosts. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @abhinandanprateek If you refer to the discussion on dev@ https://goo.gl/cU8RuX, @rhtyd proposed it as a generic HA framework for any resources (and not limited to VM). Now if it just a replacement of the existing VM-HA framework then we need to discuss the benefits it provides in more detail compared to the existing one. I have already made some specific comments on the justifications provided in favour of a new framework. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @koushik-das I've shared a list of advantages of this work over existing framework on dev@ that explain why existing VM-HA framework cannot be used for host-ha implementation. If you've more questions or comments, we can discuss them here or on dev@. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @koushik-das The current framework is specifically implemented for Host HA with KVM HA as the initial implementation. This framework is supposed to replace the framework that is specifically written for VM-HA. @rhtyd --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 I have already raised some questions on dev@ on the need for a new HA framework when the existing HA framework can do all the things mentioned. The new framework only supports VM HA. If we see some concrete implementation of network/storage or any other type of resource HA which doesn't currently exist using the new framework then it would be much more easier to see the value add. I think more discussion is needed on this. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 Thanks @DaanHoogland wherever applicable I'll address the comments. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 I went through the code and found no real issues. for any other reviewers I recommend reading the FS first. It is quit a big chunk but very neat. LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @rhtyd tests looks good, except this one: ``` ERROR: Tests default ha providers list -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_hostha_simulator.py", line 199, in test_ha_list_providers response = self.apiclient.listHostHAProviders(cmd)[0] TypeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute '__getitem__' ``` Looks like when simulator is not deployed test would fail. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 Trillian test result (tid-879) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 28334 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1960-t879-kvm-centos7.zip Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_ha_kvm_agent.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_hostha_simulator.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py Test completed. 50 look ok, 2 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 340.05 | test_privategw_acl.py test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 0.03 | test_snapshots.py test_ha_list_providers | `Error` | 0.10 | test_hostha_simulator.py test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 184.49 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 65.84 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 285.17 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 250.91 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 502.06 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 532.08 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1320.25 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Success | 561.77 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 790.78 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1315.14 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 156.78 | test_volumes.py test_08_resize_volume | Success | 156.30 | test_volumes.py test_07_resize_fail | Success | 156.18 | test_volumes.py test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 156.29 | test_volumes.py test_05_detach_volume | Success | 155.80 | test_volumes.py test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 146.25 | test_volumes.py test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 151.47 | test_volumes.py test_02_attach_volume | Success | 124.07 | test_volumes.py test_01_create_volume | Success | 718.67 | test_volumes.py test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.17 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.71 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 163.65 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 297.29 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.80 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.18 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 35.67 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.71 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.91 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 135.79 | test_templates.py test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.21 | test_templates.py test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.08 | test_templates.py test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.11 | test_templates.py test_01_create_template | Success | 40.35 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 191.68 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.76 | test_ssvm.py test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 161.37 | test_ssvm.py test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 103.06 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.39 | test_ssvm.py test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 134.02 | test_ssvm.py test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 0.96 | test_ssvm.py test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.21 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 10.93 | test_snapshots.py test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 209.78 | test_service_offerings.py test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.03 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.06 | test_service_offerings.py test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.09 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_sys_template_ready |
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-525 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1960: [4.11/Future] CLOUDSTACK-9782: Host HA and KVM HA pr...
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
