Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Wido den Hollander]

Hi Paul,

I'll build the DEB files, no problem! The RPMs is something I have no
infra for. Could you upload them?

Wido

On 11/22/18 9:16 AM, Paul Angus wrote:
> Hi Wido,
> 
> We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to 
> download.cloudstack.org  could you build the RPMs and DEBs please?
> If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul Angus
> 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav  
> Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> 
> Hi Andrija,
> 
> In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files so 
> you should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In my 
> local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to reproduce 
> the memory issue on VRs.
> 
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> 
> ____
> From: Andrija Panic 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> 
> FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while true..do 
> ...as Rene  suggested) and also observed small increase in memory, after 
> 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how significant 
> this is...
> 
> Andrija
> 
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel  
>> Hi Rohit
>>
>> I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware:
>> Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered
>> ones:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/mai
>> n/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql
>> :
>> 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default 
>> systemvmtemplate for VMware
>> 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on 
>> VMware/ESXi
>> 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8;
>>
>> When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS 
>> type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above 
>> update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. 
>> I do not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also 
>> other settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to 
>> handle memory well...
>>
>> As for the VPN part, you suggested
>>> you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings.
>> Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server, 
>> remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point 
>> me here in the right direction.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sam
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Rohit Yadav 
>>> Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>>>
>>> Hi Samuel,
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue:
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039
>>>
>>> Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and 
>>> see if
>> it
>>> helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also 
>>> work
>> with
>>> the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for 
>>> Debian
>> 9.6+.
>>>
>>>
>>> For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and 
>>> openswan for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco 
>>> endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC 
>>> VR and manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your 
>>> results or
>> send
>>> a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as
>> configure.py.
>>> The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a 
>>> general
>> error, if
>>> you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a
>> custom
>>> systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a 
>>> PR or submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc:
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues
>>>
>>>
>>> I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void
>> 4.11.2.0
>>> voting.
>>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Wei ZHOU]

Hi Paul,

yes, SSL offloading in VR is not implemented in 4.11.2.0. it is only
applicable for netscaler.
The button should be hidden it if there is no netscaler in use, same as
"health-check" and "autoScale"
see line 3421-3451 in ui/scripts/network.js

-Wei




Paul Angus  于2018年11月22日周四 下午1:51写道：

> Thanks Wei,
> I'll create a 4.11.2.1 milestone with a very limited scope.
> As well as this there seems to be an SSL cert column that has been put in
> by Accelerite that only pertains to NetScalers but appears for all
> networks, which is very confusing (well it confused me anyway).
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wei ZHOU 
> Sent: 22 November 2018 11:56
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> Hi Rohit,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I do not object to show these value to users. However, user should not be
> able to change/remove the settings, at least we can enable/disable it by
> some settings.
>
> If we can fix it in next minor release, this is not a blocker for me.
>
> -Wei
>
>
>
>
> Rohit Yadav  于2018年11月22日周四 下午12:19写道：
>
> > Hi Wei,
> >
> >
> > I think the details were available via the list API in past releases
> > (certainly 4.11.0, 4.11.1), and update API also existed therefore I
> > think it is not a blocker but could be major security issue. As a
> > workaround, admins may set the display field of keys in
> > user_vm_details details to 0, or hide the tab in UI and even disable
> > access to the update API (I get that it may not be ideal).
> >
> >
> > Let's plan to fix this and other bugs that we'll discover from
> > 4.11.2.0 towards 4.11.3.0 and we can work on 4.11.3.0's release effort
> > in next 1-2 months?
> >
> >
> > - Rohit
> >
> > <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: Wei ZHOU 
> > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 4:32:07 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >
> > found one blocker issue
> >
> > users can see the setting tab of vms, and change the value of
> > settings..
> > for example, memoryOvercommitRatio, cpuOvercommitRatio, SSH.PublicKey
> >
> > -Wei
> >
> > Wei ZHOU  于2018年11月22日周四 上午11:46写道：
> >
> > > +0
> > >
> > > tested with 4.11.2.0-rc6
> > >
> > > the following operations are ok on Ubuntu 16.04
> > >
> > > (0) build packages with the PR Rohit created
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3038. (also works on
> > > Ubuntu
> > > 18.04)
> > > (1) installation
> > > (2) created advanced zone with security groups by Marvin 4.11.2.0
> > > (3) system vms are Up.
> > > (4) upload ssl certificate, vm console works
> > > (5) install template
> > > (6) create vm
> > > (7) create vm with rootdisksize and datadisk
> > > (8) add domain/user, move vm to new user
> > > (9) change ip/mac, add new ip in vm, new ip/mac do not work. that's
> > > fine
> > >
> > > Found some issues below
> > > (1) upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.11.2.0, need to copy
> > > /etc/default/cloudstack-management.dpkg-dist to
> > > /etc/default/cloudstack-management. otherwise mgt server will not be
> > > up
> > > (2) create L2 network will get error "Unable to execute API command
> > > listnetworkofferings due to invalid value.". zoneid is not passed to
> > > UI
> > > (3) reset sshkey will reset password. new password not in response,
> > > and not shown on UI. cannot find new password anywhere
> > > (4) add network to vm, the second nic will not work. vm will be
> > > stuck at start up after reboot. We should disable it if it is not
> > > supported by cloudstack
> > >
> > > I will test advanced zone (without security groups) later.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Wei
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Paul Angus  于2018年11月22日周四 上午9:16写道：
> > >
> > >> Hi Wido,
> > >>
> > >> We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to
> > >> download.cloudstack.org  could you build the RPMs and DEBs please?
> > >> If it helps we 

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Paul Angus]

Thanks Wei,
I'll create a 4.11.2.1 milestone with a very limited scope.
As well as this there seems to be an SSL cert column that has been put in by 
Accelerite that only pertains to NetScalers but appears for all networks, which 
is very confusing (well it confused me anyway).



Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU  
Sent: 22 November 2018 11:56
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Hi Rohit,

Thanks for your reply.

I do not object to show these value to users. However, user should not be able 
to change/remove the settings, at least we can enable/disable it by some 
settings.

If we can fix it in next minor release, this is not a blocker for me.

-Wei




Rohit Yadav  于2018年11月22日周四 下午12:19写道：

> Hi Wei,
>
>
> I think the details were available via the list API in past releases 
> (certainly 4.11.0, 4.11.1), and update API also existed therefore I 
> think it is not a blocker but could be major security issue. As a 
> workaround, admins may set the display field of keys in 
> user_vm_details details to 0, or hide the tab in UI and even disable 
> access to the update API (I get that it may not be ideal).
>
>
> Let's plan to fix this and other bugs that we'll discover from 
> 4.11.2.0 towards 4.11.3.0 and we can work on 4.11.3.0's release effort 
> in next 1-2 months?
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
>
> 
> From: Wei ZHOU 
> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 4:32:07 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> found one blocker issue
>
> users can see the setting tab of vms, and change the value of 
> settings..
> for example, memoryOvercommitRatio, cpuOvercommitRatio, SSH.PublicKey
>
> -Wei
>
> Wei ZHOU  于2018年11月22日周四 上午11:46写道：
>
> > +0
> >
> > tested with 4.11.2.0-rc6
> >
> > the following operations are ok on Ubuntu 16.04
> >
> > (0) build packages with the PR Rohit created 
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3038. (also works on 
> > Ubuntu
> > 18.04)
> > (1) installation
> > (2) created advanced zone with security groups by Marvin 4.11.2.0
> > (3) system vms are Up.
> > (4) upload ssl certificate, vm console works
> > (5) install template
> > (6) create vm
> > (7) create vm with rootdisksize and datadisk
> > (8) add domain/user, move vm to new user
> > (9) change ip/mac, add new ip in vm, new ip/mac do not work. that's 
> > fine
> >
> > Found some issues below
> > (1) upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.11.2.0, need to copy 
> > /etc/default/cloudstack-management.dpkg-dist to 
> > /etc/default/cloudstack-management. otherwise mgt server will not be 
> > up
> > (2) create L2 network will get error "Unable to execute API command 
> > listnetworkofferings due to invalid value.". zoneid is not passed to 
> > UI
> > (3) reset sshkey will reset password. new password not in response, 
> > and not shown on UI. cannot find new password anywhere
> > (4) add network to vm, the second nic will not work. vm will be 
> > stuck at start up after reboot. We should disable it if it is not 
> > supported by cloudstack
> >
> > I will test advanced zone (without security groups) later.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Wei
> >
> >
> >
> > Paul Angus  于2018年11月22日周四 上午9:16写道：
> >
> >> Hi Wido,
> >>
> >> We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to 
> >> download.cloudstack.org  could you build the RPMs and DEBs please?
> >> If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign.
> >>
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >>
> >> Paul Angus
> >>
> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Rohit Yadav 
> >> Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >>
> >> Hi Andrija,
> >>
> >> In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files
> >> so you should not see any significant memory increase than say
> 25-50MBs. In
> >> my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to
> >> reproduce the memory is

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Wei ZHOU]

Hi Rohit,

Thanks for your reply.

I do not object to show these value to users. However, user should not be
able to change/remove the settings, at least we can enable/disable it by
some settings.

If we can fix it in next minor release, this is not a blocker for me.

-Wei




Rohit Yadav  于2018年11月22日周四 下午12:19写道：

> Hi Wei,
>
>
> I think the details were available via the list API in past releases
> (certainly 4.11.0, 4.11.1), and update API also existed therefore I think
> it is not a blocker but could be major security issue. As a workaround,
> admins may set the display field of keys in user_vm_details details to 0,
> or hide the tab in UI and even disable access to the update API (I get that
> it may not be ideal).
>
>
> Let's plan to fix this and other bugs that we'll discover from 4.11.2.0
> towards 4.11.3.0 and we can work on 4.11.3.0's release effort in next 1-2
> months?
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
>
> 
> From: Wei ZHOU 
> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 4:32:07 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> found one blocker issue
>
> users can see the setting tab of vms, and change the value of
> settings..
> for example, memoryOvercommitRatio, cpuOvercommitRatio, SSH.PublicKey
>
> -Wei
>
> Wei ZHOU  于2018年11月22日周四 上午11:46写道：
>
> > +0
> >
> > tested with 4.11.2.0-rc6
> >
> > the following operations are ok on Ubuntu 16.04
> >
> > (0) build packages with the PR Rohit created
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3038. (also works on Ubuntu
> > 18.04)
> > (1) installation
> > (2) created advanced zone with security groups by Marvin 4.11.2.0
> > (3) system vms are Up.
> > (4) upload ssl certificate, vm console works
> > (5) install template
> > (6) create vm
> > (7) create vm with rootdisksize and datadisk
> > (8) add domain/user, move vm to new user
> > (9) change ip/mac, add new ip in vm, new ip/mac do not work. that's fine
> >
> > Found some issues below
> > (1) upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.11.2.0, need to
> > copy /etc/default/cloudstack-management.dpkg-dist to
> > /etc/default/cloudstack-management. otherwise mgt server will not be up
> > (2) create L2 network will get error "Unable to execute API command
> > listnetworkofferings due to invalid value.". zoneid is not passed to UI
> > (3) reset sshkey will reset password. new password not in response, and
> > not shown on UI. cannot find new password anywhere
> > (4) add network to vm, the second nic will not work. vm will be stuck at
> > start up after reboot. We should disable it if it is not supported by
> > cloudstack
> >
> > I will test advanced zone (without security groups) later.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Wei
> >
> >
> >
> > Paul Angus  于2018年11月22日周四 上午9:16写道：
> >
> >> Hi Wido,
> >>
> >> We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to
> >> download.cloudstack.org  could you build the RPMs and DEBs please?
> >> If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign.
> >>
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >>
> >> Paul Angus
> >>
> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
> >> @shapeblue
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Rohit Yadav 
> >> Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >>
> >> Hi Andrija,
> >>
> >> In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files
> >> so you should not see any significant memory increase than say
> 25-50MBs. In
> >> my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to
> >> reproduce the memory issue on VRs.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Rohit Yadav
> >>
> >> 
> >> From: Andrija Panic 
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM
> >> To: dev
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >>
> >> FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while
> >> true..do ...as Rene  suggested) and also observed small increase in
> memory,
> >> after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how
> >> significant th

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Wei,


I think the details were available via the list API in past releases (certainly 
4.11.0, 4.11.1), and update API also existed therefore I think it is not a 
blocker but could be major security issue. As a workaround, admins may set the 
display field of keys in user_vm_details details to 0, or hide the tab in UI 
and even disable access to the update API (I get that it may not be ideal).


Let's plan to fix this and other bugs that we'll discover from 4.11.2.0 towards 
4.11.3.0 and we can work on 4.11.3.0's release effort in next 1-2 months?


- Rohit

<https://cloudstack.apache.org>




From: Wei ZHOU 
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 4:32:07 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

found one blocker issue

users can see the setting tab of vms, and change the value of settings..
for example, memoryOvercommitRatio, cpuOvercommitRatio, SSH.PublicKey

-Wei

Wei ZHOU  于2018年11月22日周四 上午11:46写道：

> +0
>
> tested with 4.11.2.0-rc6
>
> the following operations are ok on Ubuntu 16.04
>
> (0) build packages with the PR Rohit created
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3038. (also works on Ubuntu
> 18.04)
> (1) installation
> (2) created advanced zone with security groups by Marvin 4.11.2.0
> (3) system vms are Up.
> (4) upload ssl certificate, vm console works
> (5) install template
> (6) create vm
> (7) create vm with rootdisksize and datadisk
> (8) add domain/user, move vm to new user
> (9) change ip/mac, add new ip in vm, new ip/mac do not work. that's fine
>
> Found some issues below
> (1) upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.11.2.0, need to
> copy /etc/default/cloudstack-management.dpkg-dist to
> /etc/default/cloudstack-management. otherwise mgt server will not be up
> (2) create L2 network will get error "Unable to execute API command
> listnetworkofferings due to invalid value.". zoneid is not passed to UI
> (3) reset sshkey will reset password. new password not in response, and
> not shown on UI. cannot find new password anywhere
> (4) add network to vm, the second nic will not work. vm will be stuck at
> start up after reboot. We should disable it if it is not supported by
> cloudstack
>
> I will test advanced zone (without security groups) later.
>
> Kind regards,
> Wei
>
>
>
> Paul Angus  于2018年11月22日周四 上午9:16写道：
>
>> Hi Wido,
>>
>> We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to
>> download.cloudstack.org  could you build the RPMs and DEBs please?
>> If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Paul Angus
>>
>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rohit Yadav 
>> Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>>
>> Hi Andrija,
>>
>> In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files
>> so you should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In
>> my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to
>> reproduce the memory issue on VRs.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>>
>> 
>> From: Andrija Panic 
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM
>> To: dev
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>>
>> FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while
>> true..do ...as Rene  suggested) and also observed small increase in memory,
>> after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how
>> significant this is...
>>
>> Andrija
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel >
>> > Hi Rohit
>> >
>> > I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware:
>> > Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered
>> > ones:
>> >
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/mai
>> > n/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql
>> > :
>> > 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default
>> > systemvmtemplate for VMware
>> > 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on
>> > VMware/ESXi
>> > 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8;
>> >
>> > When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS
>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Wei ZHOU]

found one blocker issue

users can see the setting tab of vms, and change the value of settings..
for example, memoryOvercommitRatio, cpuOvercommitRatio, SSH.PublicKey

-Wei

Wei ZHOU  于2018年11月22日周四 上午11:46写道：

> +0
>
> tested with 4.11.2.0-rc6
>
> the following operations are ok on Ubuntu 16.04
>
> (0) build packages with the PR Rohit created
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3038. (also works on Ubuntu
> 18.04)
> (1) installation
> (2) created advanced zone with security groups by Marvin 4.11.2.0
> (3) system vms are Up.
> (4) upload ssl certificate, vm console works
> (5) install template
> (6) create vm
> (7) create vm with rootdisksize and datadisk
> (8) add domain/user, move vm to new user
> (9) change ip/mac, add new ip in vm, new ip/mac do not work. that's fine
>
> Found some issues below
> (1) upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.11.2.0, need to
> copy /etc/default/cloudstack-management.dpkg-dist to
> /etc/default/cloudstack-management. otherwise mgt server will not be up
> (2) create L2 network will get error "Unable to execute API command
> listnetworkofferings due to invalid value.". zoneid is not passed to UI
> (3) reset sshkey will reset password. new password not in response, and
> not shown on UI. cannot find new password anywhere
> (4) add network to vm, the second nic will not work. vm will be stuck at
> start up after reboot. We should disable it if it is not supported by
> cloudstack
>
> I will test advanced zone (without security groups) later.
>
> Kind regards,
> Wei
>
>
>
> Paul Angus  于2018年11月22日周四 上午9:16写道：
>
>> Hi Wido,
>>
>> We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to
>> download.cloudstack.org  could you build the RPMs and DEBs please?
>> If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Paul Angus
>>
>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com
>> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rohit Yadav 
>> Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>>
>> Hi Andrija,
>>
>> In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files
>> so you should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In
>> my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to
>> reproduce the memory issue on VRs.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>>
>> 
>> From: Andrija Panic 
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM
>> To: dev
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>>
>> FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while
>> true..do ...as Rene  suggested) and also observed small increase in memory,
>> after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how
>> significant this is...
>>
>> Andrija
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel >
>> > Hi Rohit
>> >
>> > I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware:
>> > Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered
>> > ones:
>> >
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/mai
>> > n/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql
>> > :
>> > 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default
>> > systemvmtemplate for VMware
>> > 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on
>> > VMware/ESXi
>> > 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8;
>> >
>> > When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS
>> > type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above
>> > update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs.
>> > I do not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also
>> > other settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to
>> > handle memory well...
>> >
>> > As for the VPN part, you suggested
>> > > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings.
>> > Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server,
>> > remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point
>> > me here in the right direction.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Sam
>> >
>> >
>> &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Wei ZHOU]

+0

tested with 4.11.2.0-rc6

the following operations are ok on Ubuntu 16.04

(0) build packages with the PR Rohit created
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3038. (also works on Ubuntu 18.04)
(1) installation
(2) created advanced zone with security groups by Marvin 4.11.2.0
(3) system vms are Up.
(4) upload ssl certificate, vm console works
(5) install template
(6) create vm
(7) create vm with rootdisksize and datadisk
(8) add domain/user, move vm to new user
(9) change ip/mac, add new ip in vm, new ip/mac do not work. that's fine

Found some issues below
(1) upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.11.2.0, need to
copy /etc/default/cloudstack-management.dpkg-dist to
/etc/default/cloudstack-management. otherwise mgt server will not be up
(2) create L2 network will get error "Unable to execute API command
listnetworkofferings due to invalid value.". zoneid is not passed to UI
(3) reset sshkey will reset password. new password not in response, and not
shown on UI. cannot find new password anywhere
(4) add network to vm, the second nic will not work. vm will be stuck at
start up after reboot. We should disable it if it is not supported by
cloudstack

I will test advanced zone (without security groups) later.

Kind regards,
Wei



Paul Angus  于2018年11月22日周四 上午9:16写道：

> Hi Wido,
>
> We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to
> download.cloudstack.org  could you build the RPMs and DEBs please?
> If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> Hi Andrija,
>
> In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files
> so you should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In
> my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to
> reproduce the memory issue on VRs.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
>
> ________
> From: Andrija Panic 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while
> true..do ...as Rene  suggested) and also observed small increase in memory,
> after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how
> significant this is...
>
> Andrija
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel 
> > Hi Rohit
> >
> > I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware:
> > Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered
> > ones:
> >
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/mai
> > n/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql
> > :
> > 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default
> > systemvmtemplate for VMware
> > 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on
> > VMware/ESXi
> > 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8;
> >
> > When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS
> > type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above
> > update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs.
> > I do not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also
> > other settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to
> > handle memory well...
> >
> > As for the VPN part, you suggested
> > > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings.
> > Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server,
> > remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point
> > me here in the right direction.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sam
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rohit Yadav 
> > > Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> > >
> > > Hi Samuel,
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue:
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039
> > >
> > > Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and
> > > see if
> > it
> > > helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also
> > > work
> > with
> > > the systemd project to see

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Paul Angus]

Hi Wido,

We're in a position to upload the 4.11.2.0 binaries to download.cloudstack.org  
could you build the RPMs and DEBs please?
If it helps we can build the RPMs and put them up for you to sign.


Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav  
Sent: 21 November 2018 16:26
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Hi Andrija,

In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files so you 
should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In my local 
testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to reproduce the 
memory issue on VRs.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav


From: Andrija Panic 
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while true..do 
...as Rene  suggested) and also observed small increase in memory, after 10min 
of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how significant this 
is...

Andrija

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel  Hi Rohit
>
> I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware:
> Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered
> ones:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/mai
> n/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql
> :
> 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default 
> systemvmtemplate for VMware
> 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on 
> VMware/ESXi
> 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8;
>
> When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS 
> type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above 
> update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. 
> I do not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also 
> other settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to 
> handle memory well...
>
> As for the VPN part, you suggested
> > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings.
> Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server, 
> remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point 
> me here in the right direction.
>
> Thanks,
> Sam
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rohit Yadav 
> > Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >
> > Hi Samuel,
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue:
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039
> >
> > Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and 
> > see if
> it
> > helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also 
> > work
> with
> > the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for 
> > Debian
> 9.6+.
> >
> >
> > For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and 
> > openswan for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco 
> > endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC 
> > VR and manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your 
> > results or
> send
> > a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as
> configure.py.
> > The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a 
> > general
> error, if
> > you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a
> custom
> > systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a 
> > PR or submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc:
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues
> >
> >
> > I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void
> 4.11.2.0
> > voting.
> >
> >
> > - Rohit
> >
> > <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: Zehnder, Samuel 
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >
> >
> > Hi Group
> >
> > First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the 
> > reply. It
> somehow
> > did not work..
> >
> >
> >
> > After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with 
> > vRouter
> > systemVMs:
> >
&g

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Andrija Panic]

Hi Rohit,

Yes exactly, I didn't see any significant rise, as said 10-20MB no more,
and that is after at least 10min of this script running - so I don't find
it significant.

Cheers

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 17:26 Rohit Yadav  Hi Andrija,
>
> In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files
> so you should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In
> my local testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to
> reproduce the memory issue on VRs.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
>
> 
> From: Andrija Panic 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while
> true..do ...as Rene  suggested) and also observed small increase in memory,
> after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how
> significant this is...
>
> Andrija
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel 
> > Hi Rohit
> >
> > I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware:
> > Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered
> > ones:
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql
> > :
> > 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default
> > systemvmtemplate for VMware
> > 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on VMware/ESXi
> > 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8;
> >
> > When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS
> > type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above
> > update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. I
> do
> > not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also other
> > settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to handle
> memory
> > well...
> >
> > As for the VPN part, you suggested
> > > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings.
> > Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server,
> > remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point me
> > here in the right direction.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sam
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rohit Yadav 
> > > Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> > >
> > > Hi Samuel,
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue:
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039
> > >
> > > Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and see
> if
> > it
> > > helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also work
> > with
> > > the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for Debian
> > 9.6+.
> > >
> > >
> > > For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and
> openswan
> > > for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco
> > > endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC VR
> and
> > > manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your results or
> > send
> > > a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as
> > configure.py.
> > > The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a general
> > error, if
> > > you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a
> > custom
> > > systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a PR
> or
> > > submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc:
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues
> > >
> > >
> > > I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void
> > 4.11.2.0
> > > voting.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Rohit
> > >
> > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > > From: Zehnder, Samuel 
> > > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Group
> > >
> > > First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mai

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Rohit Yadav]

Samuel,

We'll need to check if Debian8/9 guestos mappings even exist (last time I 
checked these oses were not available in drop down) as for older vmware 
versions these recent guest os are not supported/known. I'll help rectify this 
in the upgrade notes.

Rene, thanks please test and keep us posted.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav


From: Zehnder, Samuel 
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:05:51 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Rohit

> The upgrade notes do mention that you need to use  Other Linux (64bit) for
> vmware systemvmtemplate while registering the template prior to upgrade
> (pl see docs website). The reason for this is because newer vmware versions
> have deprecated older guets os like debian7

The doc says to use Other Linux (64 bit) or Debian 8.0 or 9.0 64-bit.

I will do some tests with strongswan and cisco and let you know about the 
findings.

Regards,
Samuel

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Rene Moser]

We used "Debian GNU/Linux 8 (64-bit)" and in the release notes I see a
"OS Type: Other Linux 64-bit (or Debian 8.0 or 9.0 64-bit)" for vmware [1].

However, let me change this to "Other Linux 64-bit" and verify if it
makes any difference here.

René

[1]
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.11.1.0/upgrading/upgrade/upgrade-4.5.html#update-system-vm-templates

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Zehnder, Samuel]

Rohit

> The upgrade notes do mention that you need to use  Other Linux (64bit) for
> vmware systemvmtemplate while registering the template prior to upgrade
> (pl see docs website). The reason for this is because newer vmware versions
> have deprecated older guets os like debian7

The doc says to use Other Linux (64 bit) or Debian 8.0 or 9.0 64-bit.

I will do some tests with strongswan and cisco and let you know about the 
findings.

Regards,
Samuel


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Andrija,

In 4.11.2 VR we've restricted the maximum size of systemd/journald files so you 
should not see any significant memory increase than say 25-50MBs. In my local 
testing with kvm, xenserver and vmware, I was never able to reproduce the 
memory issue on VRs.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav


From: Andrija Panic 
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:24:30 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while
true..do ...as Rene  suggested) and also observed small increase in memory,
after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how
significant this is...

Andrija

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel  Hi Rohit
>
> I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware:
> Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered
> ones:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql
> :
> 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default
> systemvmtemplate for VMware
> 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on VMware/ESXi
> 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8;
>
> When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS
> type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above
> update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. I do
> not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also other
> settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to handle memory
> well...
>
> As for the VPN part, you suggested
> > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings.
> Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server,
> remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point me
> here in the right direction.
>
> Thanks,
> Sam
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rohit Yadav 
> > Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >
> > Hi Samuel,
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue:
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039
> >
> > Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and see if
> it
> > helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also work
> with
> > the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for Debian
> 9.6+.
> >
> >
> > For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and openswan
> > for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco
> > endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC VR and
> > manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your results or
> send
> > a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as
> configure.py.
> > The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a general
> error, if
> > you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a
> custom
> > systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a PR or
> > submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc:
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues
> >
> >
> > I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void
> 4.11.2.0
> > voting.
> >
> >
> > - Rohit
> >
> > <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: Zehnder, Samuel 
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >
> >
> > Hi Group
> >
> > First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the reply. It
> somehow
> > did not work..
> >
> >
> >
> > After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with vRouter
> > systemVMs:
> >
> >
> >
> > 1) Memory Consumption on vSphere
> >
> > vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts
> > happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's no
> > process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", or other tools
> > report.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2) Site-2-Site VPN
> >
> > a) After a restart of the VPC (vRouter rebuild) VPN Tunnels are not
> > configured on vRouter. This has to be triggered manually with a call to
> > resetVpnCo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Samuel,

The upgrade notes do mention that you need to use  Other Linux (64bit) for 
vmware systemvmtemplate while registering the template prior to upgrade (pl see 
docs website). The reason for this is because newer vmware versions have 
deprecated older guets os like debian7. Glad you're finding that provide remedy 
to your VR memory issue.

For your VPN issue, can you first tune and share the strongswan config that 
works for you. I can then help you with the next steps on creating a bugfix for 
4.11.30 and advise you how to create and apply a custom systemvm.iso file.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav



From: Zehnder, Samuel
Sent: Wednesday, 21 November, 5:57 PM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org


Hi Rohit I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware: 
Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered ones: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql:
 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default systemvmtemplate 
for VMware 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on 
VMware/ESXi 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8; 
When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS type. I 
now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above update is doing, 
and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. I do not understand the 
reasons behind this behavior, I tried also other settings (Debian 9 64-bit, 
Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to handle memory well... As for the VPN part, 
you suggested > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings. 
Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server, remove 
it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point me here in the 
right direction. Thanks, Sam > -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav > 
Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > Hi Samuel, > > > Thanks 
for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue: > 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039 > > Please follow René's 
advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and see if it > helps, (b) have a 
script for reducing memory over time. We'll also work with > the systemd 
project to see if they can fix and backport this for Debian 9.6+. > > > For 
your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and openswan > for VPN, 
we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco > endpoint/integration can 
work with strongswan, please create a VPC VR and > manipulate the strongswan 
configs in that VR and share your results or send > a PR, the changes need to 
be in one of the python files such as configure.py. > The #2 issue is very 
specific to your environment and is not a general error, if > you're able to 
optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a custom > systemvm.iso file 
with those settings. In addition, you can send a PR or > submit a Github issue 
with details, logs, configurations etc: > 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues > > > I think both the issues are 
not general blockers and should not void 4.11.2.0 > voting. > > > - Rohit > > > 
> > > ________ > From: Zehnder, Samuel > Sent: Monday, 
November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: 
[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 > > > Hi Group > > First, sorry that I 
wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the reply. It somehow > did not work.. > 
> > > After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with vRouter > 
systemVMs: > > > > 1) Memory Consumption on vSphere > > vRouter are starting to 
swap with low memory available, this also starts > happening after increasing 
memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's no > process nor cache using the 
memory as far as "top", "ps", or other tools > report. > > > > 2) Site-2-Site 
VPN > > a) After a restart of the VPC (vRouter rebuild) VPN Tunnels are not > 
configured on vRouter. This has to be triggered manually with a call to > 
resetVpnConnection API. > > b) StrongSwan configuration does not work well with 
Cisco endpoints, I've > found following inputs: > > - multiple "rightsubnet=" 
entries are not supported with ikev1 [1], so > multiple conns should be 
configured instead > > - multiple subnets are supported with ikev2, but not 
with Cisco endpoints, > use multiple conns as well [2] > > > > For me it is 
unclear, what script should be modified for above issues, one of > those look 
promising: > > 
https://github

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Andrija Panic]

FYI, I also t tested this on KVM (ssh into VR many times with while
true..do ...as Rene  suggested) and also observed small increase in memory,
after 10min of script running, it went up by 10-20MB...but not sure how
significant this is...

Andrija

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 13:27 Zehnder, Samuel  Hi Rohit
>
> I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware:
> Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered
> ones:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql
> :
> 448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default
> systemvmtemplate for VMware
> 449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on VMware/ESXi
> 450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8;
>
> When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS
> type. I now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above
> update is doing, and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. I do
> not understand the reasons behind this behavior, I tried also other
> settings (Debian 9 64-bit, Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to handle memory
> well...
>
> As for the VPN part, you suggested
> > you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings.
> Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server,
> remove it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point me
> here in the right direction.
>
> Thanks,
> Sam
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rohit Yadav 
> > Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >
> > Hi Samuel,
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue:
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039
> >
> > Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and see if
> it
> > helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also work
> with
> > the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for Debian
> 9.6+.
> >
> >
> > For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and openswan
> > for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco
> > endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC VR and
> > manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your results or
> send
> > a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as
> configure.py.
> > The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a general
> error, if
> > you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a
> custom
> > systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a PR or
> > submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc:
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues
> >
> >
> > I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void
> 4.11.2.0
> > voting.
> >
> >
> > - Rohit
> >
> > <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: Zehnder, Samuel 
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >
> >
> > Hi Group
> >
> > First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the reply. It
> somehow
> > did not work..
> >
> >
> >
> > After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with vRouter
> > systemVMs:
> >
> >
> >
> > 1) Memory Consumption on vSphere
> >
> > vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts
> > happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's no
> > process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", or other tools
> > report.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2) Site-2-Site VPN
> >
> > a) After a restart of the VPC (vRouter rebuild) VPN Tunnels are not
> > configured on vRouter. This has to be triggered manually with a call to
> > resetVpnConnection API.
> >
> > b) StrongSwan configuration does not work well with Cisco endpoints, I've
> > found following inputs:
> >
> >   - multiple "rightsubnet=" entries are not supported with ikev1 [1], so
> > multiple conns should be configured instead
> >
> >   - multiple subnets are supported with ikev2, but not with Cisco
> endpoints,
> > use multiple conns as well [2]
> >
&

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Zehnder, Samuel]

Hi Rohit

I think I've found something regarding memory issues with vmware:
Schema-update only updates default system-vm, but not newly registered ones:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-41000to41100.sql:
448: -- Use 'Other Linux 64-bit' as guest os for the default systemvmtemplate 
for VMware
449: -- This fixes a memory allocation issue to systemvms on VMware/ESXi
450: UPDATE `cloud`.`vm_template` SET guest_os_id=99 WHERE id=8;

When I registered the new templates I selected Debian something as OS type. I 
now changed this to "Other Linux (64bit)", which is what above update is doing, 
and I can see significantly less memory used by VRs. I do not understand the 
reasons behind this behavior, I tried also other settings (Debian 9 64-bit, 
Other 3.x Linux), neither seem to handle memory well...

As for the VPN part, you suggested
> you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those settings.
Is it possible to simply replace the systemvm.iso file on mgmt-server, remove 
it from secondary and restart mgmt-server? Maybe you can point me here in the 
right direction.

Thanks,
Sam


> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2018 12:55
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> 
> Hi Samuel,
> 
> 
> Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039
> 
> Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and see if it
> helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also work with
> the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for Debian 9.6+.
> 
> 
> For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and openswan
> for VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco
> endpoint/integration can work with strongswan, please create a VPC VR and
> manipulate the strongswan configs in that VR and share your results or send
> a PR, the changes need to be in one of the python files such as configure.py.
> The #2 issue is very specific to your environment and is not a general error, 
> if
> you're able to optimize the configuration for a VR, you can build a custom
> systemvm.iso file with those settings. In addition, you can send a PR or
> submit a Github issue with details, logs, configurations etc:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues
> 
> 
> I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void 4.11.2.0
> voting.
> 
> 
> - Rohit
> 
> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> 
> 
> 
> ________
> From: Zehnder, Samuel 
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> 
> 
> Hi Group
> 
> First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the reply. It 
> somehow
> did not work..
> 
> 
> 
> After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with vRouter
> systemVMs:
> 
> 
> 
> 1) Memory Consumption on vSphere
> 
> vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts
> happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's no
> process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", or other tools
> report.
> 
> 
> 
> 2) Site-2-Site VPN
> 
> a) After a restart of the VPC (vRouter rebuild) VPN Tunnels are not
> configured on vRouter. This has to be triggered manually with a call to
> resetVpnConnection API.
> 
> b) StrongSwan configuration does not work well with Cisco endpoints, I've
> found following inputs:
> 
>   - multiple "rightsubnet=" entries are not supported with ikev1 [1], so
> multiple conns should be configured instead
> 
>   - multiple subnets are supported with ikev2, but not with Cisco endpoints,
> use multiple conns as well [2]
> 
> 
> 
> For me it is unclear, what script should be modified for above issues, one of
> those look promising:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/debian/opt/
> cloud/bin/ipsectunnel.sh
> 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/debian/opt/
> cloud/bin/configure.py
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Sam
> 
> 
> 
> [1]
> https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/ConnSection#leftrigh
> t-End-Parameters
> 
> [2] https://serverfault.com/questions/904028/strongswan-to-cisco-asa-with-
> multiple-right-subnet
> 
> 
> 
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
> 
> 


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Samuel,


Thanks for your email. I've opened this ticket for your first issue: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3039

Please follow René's advice to (a) try increase the VR memory and see if it 
helps, (b) have a script for reducing memory over time. We'll also work with 
the systemd project to see if they can fix and backport this for Debian 9.6+.


For your second issue, in 4.9 which used a Debian7 based VR and openswan for 
VPN, we've moved to strongswan. If your external Cisco endpoint/integration can 
work with strongswan, please create a VPC VR and manipulate the strongswan 
configs in that VR and share your results or send a PR, the changes need to be 
in one of the python files such as configure.py. The #2 issue is very specific 
to your environment and is not a general error, if you're able to optimize the 
configuration for a VR, you can build a custom systemvm.iso file with those 
settings. In addition, you can send a PR or submit a Github issue with details, 
logs, configurations etc: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues


I think both the issues are not general blockers and should not void 4.11.2.0 
voting.


- Rohit

<https://cloudstack.apache.org>




From: Zehnder, Samuel 
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 9:13:04 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5


Hi Group

First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the reply. It 
somehow did not work….



After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with vRouter 
systemVMs:



1) Memory Consumption on vSphere

vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts 
happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's no 
process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", or other tools report.



2) Site-2-Site VPN

a) After a restart of the VPC (vRouter rebuild) VPN Tunnels are not configured 
on vRouter. This has to be triggered manually with a call to resetVpnConnection 
API.

b) StrongSwan configuration does not work well with Cisco endpoints, I've found 
following inputs:

  - multiple "rightsubnet=" entries are not supported with ikev1 [1], so 
multiple conns should be configured instead

  - multiple subnets are supported with ikev2, but not with Cisco endpoints, 
use multiple conns as well [2]



For me it is unclear, what script should be modified for above issues, one of 
those look promising:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/debian/opt/cloud/bin/ipsectunnel.sh

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/debian/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py



Regards,

Sam



[1] 
https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/ConnSection#leftright-End-Parameters

[2] 
https://serverfault.com/questions/904028/strongswan-to-cisco-asa-with-multiple-right-subnet



rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Rene Moser]

Hi

On 11/19/18 4:43 PM, Zehnder, Samuel wrote:

> 1) Memory Consumption on vSphere
> 
> vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts
> happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's
> no process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", or other
> tools report.

We are seeing the same, looks like a memory leak to us but we assumed
that it might be related to our way we monitor the routers.

vSphere 5.5. We also increased the memory to 1gb but it only "takes more
time" to fill.

To us, it seems to be related to SSH connections or logins, and we found
a potential related issue on github indicating a memory leak in
systemd-logind

https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/8015

We were able to force the memory going down very quickly (200MB withing
minutes) by using, 2 parallel executions of the following commands ssh
in into a VR from the managemnt host (Sometimes a ctrl-c and restart is
required to enforce it)

while true; do ssh  'free'; done

with the following config

# cat .ssh/config
IdentityFile /var/cloudstack/management/.ssh/id_rsa
Port 3922
ControlPath ~/.ssh/master-%l-%r@%h:%p
ControlMaster auto

Host 10.100.10.*
  StrictHostKeyChecking no
  UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null

Regards
René

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Zehnder, Samuel]

Hi Group
First, sorry that I wasn't able to use the mailto-link for the reply. It 
somehow did not work

After Upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 we are seeing two issues with vRouter 
systemVMs:

1) Memory Consumption on vSphere
vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts 
happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's no 
process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", or other tools report.

2) Site-2-Site VPN
a) After a restart of the VPC (vRouter rebuild) VPN Tunnels are not configured 
on vRouter. This has to be triggered manually with a call to resetVpnConnection 
API.
b) StrongSwan configuration does not work well with Cisco endpoints, I've found 
following inputs:
  - multiple "rightsubnet=" entries are not supported with ikev1 [1], so 
multiple conns should be configured instead
  - multiple subnets are supported with ikev2, but not with Cisco endpoints, 
use multiple conns as well [2]

For me it is unclear, what script should be modified for above issues, one of 
those look promising:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/debian/opt/cloud/bin/ipsectunnel.sh
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/debian/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py

Regards,
Sam

[1] 
https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/ConnSection#leftright-End-Parameters
[2] 
https://serverfault.com/questions/904028/strongswan-to-cisco-asa-with-multiple-right-subnet



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Paul Angus]

+1 (binding) from me

As a result of smoke testing with VMware6.5, Ubuntu KVM 16.04 (basic zone), 
XS7.1, XCP7.4, CentOS 7.4 KVM and CentOS 6.9 KVM.


Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Rene Moser  
Sent: 17 November 2018 08:18
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

+0 Won't have a chance to test it, but RC4 look already not too bad to me.

Thanks for all the works!


On 11/13/18 2:59 PM, Paul Angus wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for 
> testing and a vote:
> 
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs
> /heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
> Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
> "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Additional information:
> 
> For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
> 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/
> 
> The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template 
> upgrade section has been updated.
> 
> 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/
> 
> Only the following changes have been added to RC5:
> 
> +-+--+---+--++
> | Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | Description 
>|
> +=+==+===+==+=
> +===+
> | 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | Prevent 
> error on GroupAnswers on VR creation   |
> +-+--+---+--++
> | 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ |   |  | Add missing 
> ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after|
> | |  |   |  | upgrade 
>|
> +-+--+---+--++
> | 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ |   |  | [4.11] Fix 
> set initial reservation on public IP ranges |
> +-+--+---+--++
> | 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ |   |  | Fix 
> DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase   |
> | |  |   |  | isolation 
> methods  |
> +-+--+---+--++
> 
> .. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012
> .. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018
> .. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007
> .. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980
> .. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul Angus
> 
> 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
>   
>  
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Rene Moser]

+0 Won't have a chance to test it, but RC4 look already not too bad to me.

Thanks for all the works!


On 11/13/18 2:59 PM, Paul Angus wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for 
> testing and a vote:
> 
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
> Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
> "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Additional information:
> 
> For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
> 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/
> 
> The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template 
> upgrade section has been updated.
> 
> 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/
> 
> Only the following changes have been added to RC5:
> 
> +-+--+---+--++
> | Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | Description 
>|
> +=+==+===+==++
> | 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | Prevent 
> error on GroupAnswers on VR creation   |
> +-+--+---+--++
> | 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ |   |  | Add missing 
> ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after|
> | |  |   |  | upgrade 
>|
> +-+--+---+--++
> | 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ |   |  | [4.11] Fix 
> set initial reservation on public IP ranges |
> +-+--+---+--++
> | 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ |   |  | Fix 
> DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase   |
> | |  |   |  | isolation 
> methods  |
> +-+--+---+--++
> 
> .. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012
> .. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018
> .. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007
> .. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980
> .. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul Angus
> 
> 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Tutkowski, Mike]

+1 (binding)

I performed manual testing of a Basic Zone making use of vSphere and XenServer.

On 11/16/18, 5:49 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




We're looking good so far, but I'd still like some more votes (hopefully 
+1s  ), Please do test and cast your vote.

Thanks.


Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic 
Sent: 16 November 2018 12:12
To: dev 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

+1

Tested:
- KVM environment
- building DEB packages for Ubuntu
- advanced and basic zone deployment, MGMT srv on Ubuntu 14.04, KVM Ubuntu
14.04 (qemu versions equivalent to Ubuntu 16.04)
- a bunch of integration tests done from in-house suite of tests (system 
and user tests)
- online and offline storage migration from NFS/CEPH to SolidFire


On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 10:13, Dag Sonstebo 
wrote:

> +1
>
> Various customer related configurations and lifecycle operations, all
> looking good.
>
> Environment:
> - Mgmt: CentOS7.5
> - HV: VMware 5.5
> - Advanced zone
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 16/11/2018, 08:48, "Boris Stoyanov" 
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was
> successful, I’ve also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation
> and it was looking good.
>
> Regards,
> Bobby.
>
>
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
> > On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher 
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles.
> >
> > Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04
> > Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04
> > - create/use/delete system and user VMs
> > - register new template
> > - register service offering
> > - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove)
> >
> > Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike <
> > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu:
> >
> >> Thanks, Rohit!
>     >>
    > >>
    > >> 
> >> From: Rohit Yadav 
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >>
> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
> links or
> >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is
> >> safe.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,
> >>
> >>
> >> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic
> zone and
> >> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but 
a
> >> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means
> of
> >> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for
> VMware. I
> >> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses
> VMware+basic
> >> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue:
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031
> >>
> >>
> >> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for
> this
> >> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.
> >>
> >>
> >> - Rohit
> >>
> >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Paul Angus]

We're looking good so far, but I'd still like some more votes (hopefully +1s  
), Please do test and cast your vote.

Thanks.


Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic  
Sent: 16 November 2018 12:12
To: dev 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

+1

Tested:
- KVM environment
- building DEB packages for Ubuntu
- advanced and basic zone deployment, MGMT srv on Ubuntu 14.04, KVM Ubuntu
14.04 (qemu versions equivalent to Ubuntu 16.04)
- a bunch of integration tests done from in-house suite of tests (system and 
user tests)
- online and offline storage migration from NFS/CEPH to SolidFire


On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 10:13, Dag Sonstebo 
wrote:

> +1
>
> Various customer related configurations and lifecycle operations, all 
> looking good.
>
> Environment:
> - Mgmt: CentOS7.5
> - HV: VMware 5.5
> - Advanced zone
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 16/11/2018, 08:48, "Boris Stoyanov" 
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was 
> successful, I’ve also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation 
> and it was looking good.
>
> Regards,
> Bobby.
>
>
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
> > On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher 
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles.
> >
> > Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04
> > Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04
> > - create/use/delete system and user VMs
> > - register new template
> > - register service offering
> > - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove)
> >
> > Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike <
> > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu:
> >
> >> Thanks, Rohit!
>     >>
>     >>
> >> 
> >> From: Rohit Yadav 
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >>
> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
> links or
> >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is
> >> safe.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,
> >>
> >>
> >> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic
> zone and
> >> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a
> >> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means
> of
> >> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for
> VMware. I
> >> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses
> VMware+basic
> >> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue:
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031
>     >>
>     >>
> >> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for
> this
> >> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.
> >>
> >>
> >> - Rohit
> >>
> >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> >> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >>
> >> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe
> that’s
> >> still supported in CS 4.11.
> >>
> >> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
> links or
> >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is
> >> safe.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.
&g

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Andrija Panic]

+1

Tested:
- KVM environment
- building DEB packages for Ubuntu
- advanced and basic zone deployment, MGMT srv on Ubuntu 14.04, KVM Ubuntu
14.04 (qemu versions equivalent to Ubuntu 16.04)
- a bunch of integration tests done from in-house suite of tests (system
and user tests)
- online and offline storage migration from NFS/CEPH to SolidFire


On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 10:13, Dag Sonstebo 
wrote:

> +1
>
> Various customer related configurations and lifecycle operations, all
> looking good.
>
> Environment:
> - Mgmt: CentOS7.5
> - HV: VMware 5.5
> - Advanced zone
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 16/11/2018, 08:48, "Boris Stoyanov" 
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was successful,
> I’ve also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation and it was looking
> good.
>
> Regards,
> Bobby.
>
>
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> > On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher 
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles.
> >
> > Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04
> > Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04
> > - create/use/delete system and user VMs
> > - register new template
> > - register service offering
> > - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove)
> >
> > Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike <
> > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu:
> >
> >> Thanks, Rohit!
> >>
>     >>
> >> 
> >> From: Rohit Yadav 
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >>
> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
> links or
> >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is
> >> safe.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,
> >>
> >>
> >> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic
> zone and
> >> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a
> >> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means
> of
> >> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for
> VMware. I
> >> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses
> VMware+basic
> >> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue:
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031
> >>
> >>
> >> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for
> this
> >> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.
> >>
> >>
> >> - Rohit
> >>
> >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> >> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
> >>
> >> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe
> that’s
> >> still supported in CS 4.11.
> >>
> >> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
> links or
> >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is
> >> safe.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.
>     >>
>     >> On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
> links or
> >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is
> >> safe.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Dag Sonstebo]

+1 

Various customer related configurations and lifecycle operations, all looking 
good.

Environment:
- Mgmt: CentOS7.5
- HV: VMware 5.5
- Advanced zone

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 16/11/2018, 08:48, "Boris Stoyanov"  wrote:

+1 

I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was successful, I’ve 
also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation and it was looking good. 

Regards, 
Bobby.


boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 


dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 

> On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher  wrote:
> 
> +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles.
> 
> Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04
> Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04
> - create/use/delete system and user VMs
> - register new template
> - register service offering
> - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove)
> 
> Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu:
> 
>> Thanks, Rohit!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Rohit Yadav 
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,
>> 
>> 
>> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and
>> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a
>> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of
>> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I
>> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic
>> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue:
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031
>> 
>> 
>> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this
>> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.
>> 
>> 
>> - Rohit
>> 
>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
>> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>> 
>> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s
>> still supported in CS 4.11.
>> 
>> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  
wrote:
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.
>> 
>> On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
    >> Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
>> I'll fire a similar build in out lab.
>> 
>> 
>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
>> @shapeblue
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
>> Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>> 
>> Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up
>> fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see
>> it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors 
in
>> cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Boris Stoyanov]

+1 

I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was successful, I’ve 
also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation and it was looking good. 

Regards, 
Bobby.


boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 

> On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher  wrote:
> 
> +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles.
> 
> Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04
> Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04
> - create/use/delete system and user VMs
> - register new template
> - register service offering
> - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove)
> 
> Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu:
> 
>> Thanks, Rohit!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Rohit Yadav 
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,
>> 
>> 
>> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and
>> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a
>> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of
>> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I
>> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic
>> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue:
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031
>> 
>> 
>> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this
>> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.
>> 
>> 
>> - Rohit
>> 
>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
>> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>> 
>> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s
>> still supported in CS 4.11.
>> 
>> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.
>> 
>> On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
>> I'll fire a similar build in out lab.
>> 
>> 
>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
>> @shapeblue
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
>> Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>> 
>> Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up
>> fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see
>> it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in
>> cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management
>> server?
>> 
>> On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess
>> that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware...
>> have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
>> I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
>> Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the
>> vCenter console what do you see?
>> 
>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> Amadeus House, Floral Street, L

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Gabriel Beims Bräscher]

+1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles.

Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04
Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04
- create/use/delete system and user VMs
- register new template
- register service offering
- work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove)

Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike <
mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu:

> Thanks, Rohit!
>
>
> 
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
>
>
>
> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,
>
>
> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and
> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a
> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of
> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I
> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic
> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031
>
>
> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this
> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
>
> 
> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s
> still supported in CS 4.11.
>
> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:
>
> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
>
>
>
> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.
>
> On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:
>
> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
>
>
>
> Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
> I'll fire a similar build in out lab.
>
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
> Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up
> fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see
> it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in
> cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management
> server?
>
> On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:
>
> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
>
>
>
> I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess
> that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware...
> have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
> I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
> Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the
> vCenter console what do you see?
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
> Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully.
>
> I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the
> system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.
>
> I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the
> GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade
> the template, the operation fails.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:
>
> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Thanks, Rohit!



From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open 
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,


I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and could 
see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a limitation from 
the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of security group 
(host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I think nobody 
reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic zone, I've opened an 
issue for this issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031


Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this 
limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.


- Rohit

<https://cloudstack.apache.org>




From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s still 
supported in CS 4.11.

On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open 
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.

On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open 
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. 
They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the 
login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. 
Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open 
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that 
it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you 
used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the vCenter 
console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM 
template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, 
it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the 
template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open 
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for 
testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,


I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and could 
see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a limitation from 
the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of security group 
(host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I think nobody 
reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic zone, I've opened an 
issue for this issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031


Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this 
limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.


- Rohit

<https://cloudstack.apache.org>




From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s still 
supported in CS 4.11.

On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.

On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up 
fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at 
the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in 
cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I 
guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... 
have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through 
the vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up 
successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using 
the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR 
in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade 
the template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following 
artefacts up for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the 
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 
16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure 
to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
  

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Paul Angus]

I'm seeing the same thing.  VR has a guest IP, but no management IP.
If I cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline I can see that the eth1 ip=0.0.0.0 and 
eth1mask=0.0.0.0 which is nonsense...

I'll get someone to look into it.

Thanks mike

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike  
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:58
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

The VR’s IP address was not being reported on the main GUI window, but I found 
it in the VR details (and also via ifconfig on the VR itself).

I can ping both ways successfully: From the management server to the VR and 
vice versa.

On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.

On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up 
fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at 
the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in 
cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I 
guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... 
have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through 
the vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
        Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up 
successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using 
the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR 
in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade 
the template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following 
artefacts up for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the 
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 
16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure 
to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional inform

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Tutkowski, Mike]

I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s still 
supported in CS 4.11.

On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.

On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up 
fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at 
the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in 
cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I 
guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... 
have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through 
the vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
        Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up 
successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using 
the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR 
in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade 
the template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following 
artefacts up for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the 
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 
16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure 
to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm 
template upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

   

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Tutkowski, Mike]

The VR’s IP address was not being reported on the main GUI window, but I found 
it in the VR details (and also via ifconfig on the VR itself).

I can ping both ways successfully: From the management server to the VR and 
vice versa.

On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.

On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up 
fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at 
the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in 
cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I 
guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... 
have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through 
the vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
        Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up 
successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using 
the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR 
in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade 
the template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following 
artefacts up for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the 
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 
16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure 
to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm 
template upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

   

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Tutkowski, Mike]

The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.

On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up 
fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at 
the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in 
cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I 
guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... 
have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through the 
vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up 
successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the 
system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in 
the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade 
the template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts 
up for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th 
Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm 
template upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

Only the following changes have been added to RC5:


+-+--+---+--++
| Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | 
Description|

+=+==+===+==++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | 
Prev

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Paul Angus]

Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike  
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. 
They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the 
login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. 
Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess 
that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have 
you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through the 
vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system 
VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the 
GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the 
template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up 
for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template 
upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

Only the following changes have been added to RC5:


+-+--+---+--++
| Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | 
Description|

+=+==+===+==++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | 
Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR creation   |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ |   |  | Add 
missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after|
| |  |   |  | 
upgrade|

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ |   |  | 
[4.11] Fix set initial r

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. 
They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the 
login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. 
Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess 
that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have 
you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through the 
vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system 
VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the 
GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the 
template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up 
for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template 
upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

Only the following changes have been added to RC5:


+-+--+---+--++
| Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | 
Description|

+=+==+===+==++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | 
Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR creation   |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ |   |  | Add 
missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after|
| |  |   |  | 
upgrade|

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ |   |  | 
[4.11] Fix set initial reservation on public IP ranges |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ |   |  | Fix 
DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase   |
| |  |   |

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Paul Angus]

I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that 
it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you 
used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through the vCenter 
console what do you see? 

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike  
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM 
template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, 
it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the 
template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for 
testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template 
upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

Only the following changes have been added to RC5:


+-+--+---+--++
| Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | 
Description|

+=+==+===+==++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | Prevent 
error on GroupAnswers on VR creation   |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ |   |  | Add 
missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after|
| |  |   |  | upgrade   
 |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ |   |  | [4.11] 
Fix set initial reservation on public IP ranges |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ |   |  | Fix 
DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase   |
| |  |   |  | isolation 
methods  |

+-+--+---+--++

.. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012
.. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018
.. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007
.. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980
.. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010



Kind regards,

Paul Angus


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Tutkowski, Mike]

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM 
template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, 
it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the 
template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for 
testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template 
upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

Only the following changes have been added to RC5:


+-+--+---+--++
| Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | 
Description|

+=+==+===+==++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | Prevent 
error on GroupAnswers on VR creation   |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ |   |  | Add 
missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after|
| |  |   |  | upgrade   
 |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ |   |  | [4.11] 
Fix set initial reservation on public IP ranges |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ |   |  | Fix 
DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase   |
| |  |   |  | isolation 
methods  |

+-+--+---+--++

.. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012
.. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018
.. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007
.. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980
.. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010



Kind regards,

Paul Angus


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Rohit Yadav]

+1 (binding)


Verified signed source tarball, deployed a local kvm based env in advanced zone 
and was able to validate vm, volume and network lifecycles tests.


- Rohit

<https://cloudstack.apache.org>




From: Paul Angus 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 7:29:33 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for 
testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template upgrade 
section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

Only the following changes have been added to RC5:

+-+--+---+--++
| Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | Description   
 |
+=+==+===+==++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | Prevent error 
on GroupAnswers on VR creation   |
+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ |   |  | Add missing 
ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after|
| |  |   |  | upgrade   
 |
+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ |   |  | [4.11] Fix 
set initial reservation on public IP ranges |
+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ |   |  | Fix 
DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase   |
| |  |   |  | isolation 
methods  |
+-+--+---+--++

.. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012
.. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018
.. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007
.. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980
.. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010



Kind regards,

Paul Angus


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Paul Angus]

Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for 
testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template upgrade 
section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

Only the following changes have been added to RC5:

+-+--+---+--++
| Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | Description   
 |
+=+==+===+==++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | Prevent error 
on GroupAnswers on VR creation   |
+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ |   |  | Add missing 
ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after|
| |  |   |  | upgrade   
 |
+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ |   |  | [4.11] Fix 
set initial reservation on public IP ranges |
+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ |   |  | Fix 
DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase   |
| |  |   |  | isolation 
methods  |
+-+--+---+--++

.. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012
.. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018
.. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007
.. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980
.. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010



Kind regards,

Paul Angus


paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue