Re: [vote] Ross Gardler as a new Cocoon committer

2005-10-06 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
On 10/5/05, Daniel Fagerstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi all!

 I'd like to propose Ross Gardler as a Cocoon committer. He is one of the
 driving forces in the Forrest project, he has been quite active in our
 documentation efforts and in integrating Forrest, Lenya and Cocoon.

+1, Ross well deserves it.

--
Gianugo Rabellino
Pro-netics s.r.l. -  http://www.pro-netics.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com
(blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/)


Re: [vote] Ross Gardler as a new Cocoon committer

2005-10-06 Thread Torsten Curdt


On 06.10.2005, at 08:10, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:


On 10/5/05, Daniel Fagerstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi all!

I'd like to propose Ross Gardler as a Cocoon committer. He is one  
of the
driving forces in the Forrest project, he has been quite active in  
our

documentation efforts and in integrating Forrest, Lenya and Cocoon.





+1
--
Torsten


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36466] - ImageReader problem with grayScaleFilter

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36466.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36466





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 09:56 ---
As i've said before, i've modified the code so that color and grayscalefilter
are recycled after each usage.

Can you test this with 2.1.8dev (built from SVN) and report back?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Re: Daisy on cocoon.zones.apache.org upgraded

2005-10-06 Thread hepabolu

Bruno Dumon wrote:

The Daisy on the zone is now upgraded to version 1.4-M1.

If you used the editor recently (within a day), it is best to clear your
browsers' cache first so the new javascript files etc. get loaded.

New in Daisy 1.4 is the ability to publish books out of Daisy documents.
I have created/published two of them, one for the new documentation and
one for the legacy documentation (the book structure is based on the
navigation structure). You can view them here:

http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/books/
(warning: PDFs are 1.2 MB and 4.3 MB for the legacy docs)



Thanks, it's brilliant.

Bye, Helma



Re: svn commit: r306534 - in /cocoon: blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/ blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/conf/ blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/ blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apach

2005-10-06 Thread Ralph Goers

Will you be applying this to 2.1.8?

Ralph

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Author: cziegeler
Date: Wed Oct  5 22:57:28 2005
New Revision: 306534

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=306534view=rev
Log:
Further cleanup of profile handling, improve user related event handling and 
adding profile saving to group based profile manager.

Added:
   cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/authenticationfw/
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/authenticationfw/LoginAction.java
 - copied, changed from r294901, 
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/acting/LoginAction.java
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/authenticationfw/LogoutAction.java
 - copied, changed from r294901, 
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/acting/LogoutAction.java
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/authenticationfw/User.java
   (with props)
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/event/user/UserEventUtil.java
   (with props)
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/event/user/UserIsAccessingEvent.java
   (with props)
Removed:
   cocoon/blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/conf/auth-fw.xconf
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/acting/LoginAction.java
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/acting/LogoutAction.java
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/profile/PortalUserInfoProvider.java
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/profile/impl/AuthenticationFWUserInfoProvider.java
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/profile/impl/UserInfoProvider.java
Modified:
   cocoon/blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/conf/auth-cowarp.xconf
   cocoon/blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/conf/cocoon-portal-sample.xconf
   cocoon/blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/sitemap-auth.xmap
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/event/impl/DefaultEventManager.java
   cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/portal.roles
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/profile/ProfileManager.java
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/profile/impl/AbstractProfileManager.java
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/profile/impl/GroupBasedProfileManager.java
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/profile/impl/MapProfileLS.java
   
cocoon/blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/profile/impl/UserInfo.java
   cocoon/trunk/lib/optional/cowarp-0.5-dev-20051002.jar

Modified: cocoon/blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/conf/auth-cowarp.xconf
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/cocoon/blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/conf/auth-cowarp.xconf?rev=306534r1=306533r2=306534view=diff
==
--- cocoon/blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/conf/auth-cowarp.xconf (original)
+++ cocoon/blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/conf/auth-cowarp.xconf Wed Oct  5 
22:57:28 2005
@@ -34,25 +34,6 @@
  --
  component role=org.osoco.cowarp.Application/portal 
 class=org.osoco.cowarp.portal.StandardPortalApplication 
- security-handler=portal

-profiles
-  copletbasedata-global-load 
uri=cocoon:raw:/load-global-profile?profile=copletbasedata/
-  copletdata-global-load 
uri=cocoon:raw:/load-global-profile?profile=copletdata/
-  copletdata-role-load 
uri=cocoon:raw:/load-role-profile?profile=copletdata/
-  copletdata-user-load 
uri=cocoon:raw:/load-user-profile?profile=copletdata/
-  copletinstancedata-global-load 
uri=cocoon:raw:/load-global-profile?profile=copletinstancedata/
-  copletinstancedata-role-load 
uri=cocoon:raw:/load-role-profile?profile=copletinstancedata/
-  copletinstancedata-user-load 
uri=cocoon:raw:/load-user-profile?profile=copletinstancedata/
-  copletinstancedata-user-save 
uri=cocoon:raw:/save-user-profile?profile=copletinstancedata/
-  layout-global-load 
uri=cocoon:raw:/load-global-profile?profile=layout/
-  layout-role-load uri=cocoon:raw:/load-role-profile?profile=layout/
-  layout-user-load uri=cocoon:raw:/load-user-profile?profile=layout/
-  layout-user-save uri=cocoon:raw:/save-user-profile?profile=layout/
-/profiles
-  /component
-  component 
class=org.apache.cocoon.portal.profile.impl.GroupBasedProfileManager
- role=org.apache.cocoon.portal.profile.ProfileManager
-parameter name=userinfo-provider 
value=org.osoco.cowarp.portal.UserInfoProviderImpl/
-  /component
+ security-handler=portal/

/components

Modified: 
cocoon/blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/conf/cocoon-portal-sample.xconf
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/cocoon/blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/conf/cocoon-portal-sample.xconf?rev=306534r1=306533r2=306534view=diff

Re: [RT] seven good reasons to close down users@cocoon.apache.org

2005-10-06 Thread Torsten Curdt


Too bad you cannot cross-post between the two lists, that alone  
could have made things easier.




The developer list should receive mails also from the user list  
with [Users] prepended. In this way developers get user mails, but  
users don't need to read all the longwinding discussions about  
internals (which tend to frighten some).


TBH I think forwarding the mails from users to dev
is nothing but saying developers have to be subscribed
to users. Whether forcing this is a good or a bad
idea is a different thing ...but I am still in
favor of *not* forwarding. I don't really see the
point of it.

Let's better have a few more developer subscribed
to users again.

cheers
--
Torsten


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: svn commit: r306534 - in /cocoon: blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/ blocks/portal-sample/trunk/samples/conf/ blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/portal/ blocks/portal/trunk/java/org/apach

2005-10-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Ralph Goers schrieb:
 Will you be applying this to 2.1.8?
 
Yes, as soon as its working :) I'm just trying to test it.

Carsten


-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, SN AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/


Re: [RT] seven good reasons to close down users@cocoon.apache.org

2005-10-06 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz

Le 6 oct. 05, à 10:04, Torsten Curdt a écrit :

...Let's better have a few more developer subscribed
to users again


Yes, after this discussion I think it's good enough - and I like the 
idea of filtering both lists to the same folder in my mail client, so 
as not to overlook user's messages. I'll try that!


-Bertrand



Re: [RT] seven good reasons to close down users@cocoon.apache.org

2005-10-06 Thread Torsten Curdt

 you want to reduce that count, I am still interested in hints on
- why I'm getting Attempted to release a $Proxy20 but its handler  
could not be located. messages in my logs. [1]
- why the ComponentManager appears to be null in my  
transformers' (SitemapComponentTestCase subclass) unit tests but  
not my actions'. [2]


In my experience, it doesn't matter which list I ask for help on,  
it still gets ignored.


That sounds really frustrated.
Sorry about that.


  Or maybe it's just me.


Maybe it just did not ring
a bell when people read it.

Being a developer does not
necessarily mean having the
answer right away.

In the end it probably comes
down to how much time a developer
can spend on tracking down
the bug you are seeing.
If you can reduce that time
you are more likely to get an
answer.

Just my 2 cents

cheers
--
Torsten



PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36781] - [PATCH] repeater min and maxsize attributes

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36781.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36781


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 10:28 ---
applied, thanks.

I did not apply the modifications to the samples, it would be better to have a
separate sample for this.

I have updated the documentation in Daisy. Please check if all went in ok and 
close.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34015] - Cforms greek messages

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34015.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34015


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 10:36 ---
FormsMessages is added to the CForms block system resources. The other two files
are saved for future processing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36612] - [Link] OSN

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36612.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36612


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 10:48 ---
Info added to Daisy

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36946] New: - error in forms samples

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36946.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36946

   Summary: error in forms samples
   Product: Cocoon 2
   Version: Current SVN 2.1
  Platform: Other
   URL: http://localhost:/samples/blocks/forms/v2/example
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Samples
AssignedTo: dev@cocoon.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Validation rule value-count cannot be used with strings, error at
file:/D:/src/cocoon-2.1.x/build/webapp/samples/blocks/forms/v2/form1.xml:115:38
file:/D:/src/cocoon-2.1.x/build/webapp/samples/blocks/forms/v2/form1.xml - 
115:38   

Error calling flowscript function example
file:/D:/src/cocoon-2.1.x/build/webapp/samples/blocks/forms/v2/form1.xml -
115:38  [Exception]
resource://org/apache/cocoon/forms/flow/javascript/v2/Form.js - 53:-1   
file:/D:/src/cocoon-2.1.x/build/webapp/samples/blocks/forms/v2/forms_flow_example.js
- 27:-1 
file:/D:/src/cocoon-2.1.x/build/webapp/samples/blocks/forms/v2/forms_flow_example.js
- 22:-1 
file:/D:/src/cocoon-2.1.x/build/webapp/samples/blocks/forms/v2/sitemap.xmap -
68:39   map:call
file:/D:/src/cocoon-2.1.x/build/webapp/samples/blocks/forms/sitemap.xmap -
575:65  map:mount
file:/D:/src/cocoon-2.1.x/build/webapp/samples/blocks/sitemap.xmap - 66:68
map:mount
file:/D:/src/cocoon-2.1.x/build/webapp/samples/sitemap.xmap - 194:65
map:mount
file:/D:/src/cocoon-2.1.x/build/webapp/sitemap.xmap - 663:66map:mount

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34084] - [2.1.7 Testing] Various

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34084.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34084


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 10:55 ---
@marco: the error still persists after applying your patch. I've moved this
particular issue to #36946

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36946] - error in forms samples

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36946.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36946


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 10:56 ---
initial patch from marco rolappe (bug #34084) did not resolve the issue.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34084] - [2.1.7 Testing] Various

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34084.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34084


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Antwort: RE: [GT2005] notetaking

2005-10-06 Thread manfred . weigel

Hi Arjé,

Please invite me :-)

mit freundlichen Grüßen / kind regards
Manfred Weigel

Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG
ORG/IT - Software Development
A-1030 Vienna, Am Stadtpark 9
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@inet









[EMAIL PROTECTED]@inet 
 
05.10.2005 12:00

Bitte antworten an
dev@cocoon.apache.org@inet









An
dev@cocoon.apache.org


Kopie



Thema
RE: [GT2005] notetaking








Apparentely, you have to be invited to be able to join this page...
Please reply on this thread and I'll invite you..

 -Original Message-
 From: Arje Cahn 
 Posted At: woensdag 5 oktober 2005 10:59
 Posted To: Cocoon Dev List
 Conversation: [GT2005] notetaking
 Subject: [GT2005] notetaking
 
 
 we're taking notes now at
 www.jotlive.com/hippo/Cocoon%20GT
 
 feel free to join!
 
 
 
 Kind regards,
 Met vriendelijke groet,
 
 Arjé Cahn
 
 Hippo 
 
 Oosteinde 11
 1017WT Amsterdam
 The Netherlands
 Tel +31 (0)20 5224466
 -
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.hippo.nl
 --
 
 
 
 

 


This message and any attachment (the Message) are confidential. If you have received the Message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the Message from your system , any use of the Message is forbidden.
Correspondence via e-mail is primarily for information purposes. RZB neither makes nor accepts legally binding statements unless otherwise agreed to the contrary.



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36872] - Internal pipelines eat HTTP headers without warning

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36872.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36872


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Internal pipelines and  |Internal pipelines eat HTTP
   |map:mount eat HTTP headers  |headers without warning
   |without warning |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 11:19 ---
Corrected the title, map:mount does not eat the headers

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36872] - Internal pipelines eat HTTP headers without warning

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36872.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36872





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 11:37 ---
The initial problem
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=109783251408219w=2) was

I have the following case :

  generatorreader
  |  |
  validator .. dtd
  |
  serializer

Where the dtd reader sets Content-Length, which is obviously wrong for the final
output.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35979] - fi:validation-errors styling element does not work in AJAX mode

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35979.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35979


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33315] - cygwin detection in build.sh is not optimal

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 11:50 ---
fixed using snippet from cocoon.sh

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


add --noconfig as a default ant option in build.sh?

2005-10-06 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Sandor Spruit suggests this, see 
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-usersm=112858673106600w=2


Any objections  to make this the default when ant is called from 
build.sh?


If not I'll add it to the branch and trunk builds.

What the option does for ant is:

  --noconfig suppress sourcing of /etc/ant.conf,
 $HOME/.ant/ant.conf, and $HOME/.antrc
 configuration files

-Bertrand



Re: add --noconfig as a default ant option in build.sh?

2005-10-06 Thread Upayavira

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Sandor Spruit suggests this, see 
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-usersm=112858673106600w=2


Any objections  to make this the default when ant is called from build.sh?

If not I'll add it to the branch and trunk builds.

What the option does for ant is:

  --noconfig suppress sourcing of /etc/ant.conf,
 $HOME/.ant/ant.conf, and $HOME/.antrc
 configuration files

Makes a lot of sense. This would explain why some people seem to have 
trouble with our ant build.


Regards, Upayavira



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30406] - [javaflow] JavaFlow throws VerifyError when using .class in code

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30406.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30406


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|dev@cocoon.apache.org   |commons-
   ||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Component|blocks  |Sandbox
Product|Cocoon 2|Commons
Summary|JavaFlow throws VerifyError |[javaflow] JavaFlow throws
   |when using .class in code   |VerifyError when using
   ||.class in code
Version|2.1.5   |Nightly Builds




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35595] - SQLTransformer makes Cocoon hang under high load

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35595.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35595


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 12:12 ---
You missed several things:

1. Since Cocoon 2.1.8 (not released yet), SQLTransformer re-uses connection for
nested queries, if possible. In your example, it will use 1 connection per
request, and will not block.

2. Even if you do require multiple connections, connectAttempts and
connectWaittime are configurable - see transformer docs.

3. Database connection pool can be configured either to block (and wait), or to
throw exception immediately if no connections are available in the pool.

Make sure you have properly configured both pool and transformer, and get latest
transformer version from the SVN.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23939] - document('relative-URI') seems to resolve wrongly depending on request-URI (SourceResolver?)

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23939.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23939


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 12:36 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
 Can someone tell the status of this bug?

I have tried to reproduce this bug in Cocoon 2.1.7, but was unsuccessful.
The scenarios described here all work. The only way to get a count of 0
(document cannot be read) is when the URL in the document function points to a
non-existent file, or when the file contains a DOCTYPE declaration which cannot
be resolved.
That is normal behaviour.

The files mentioned in this bug cannot be downloaded any more; they have
disappeared from the server. So I reconstructed something very close on the
basis of the info given.

I think this bug can be resolved as FIXED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30894] - SQLTransformer doesn't support SPs that return a result set

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30894.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30894


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dev@cocoon.apache.org
 AssignedTo|dev@cocoon.apache.org   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36949] New: - SendMailTransformer and HTML body

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36949

   Summary: SendMailTransformer and HTML body
   Product: Cocoon 2
   Version: Current SVN 2.1
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: blocks
AssignedTo: dev@cocoon.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


The SendMailTransformer is unable to handle XML tags directly in the SAX flow.
ex : 
email:sendmail
 email:smtphostsmtp/email:smtphost
 email:from[EMAIL PROTECTED]/email:from
 email:to[EMAIL PROTECTED]/email:to

 email:subject
   Bogus sendmailtrasformer
 /email:subject
 email:body
   htmlbody 
 pthis is a paragraph/p
 panother/p
   /body/html
 /email:body
/email:sendmail

It simply remove xml tags in the body !
It a a strange behaviour since DEFAULT_BODY_MIMETYPE = text/html ...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36949] - SendMailTransformer and HTML body

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36949





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 12:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=16604)
 -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16604action=view)
Patch to make it working

This patch solves the problem

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Re: [RT] seven good reasons to close down users@cocoon.apache.org

2005-10-06 Thread Antonio Fiol Bonnín
 In my experience, it doesn't matter which list I ask for help on, it still gets ignored.
That sounds really frustrated.Sorry about that.

My experience (although probably not objectively realistic, and biased
by bad experiences) is that my first request for help is usually
answered, even by a few people, but without fully solving the problem
(blame me: my first post contains most certainly insufficient
information), and the second round is unanswered.

So I usually get insightful answers which help me continue my research
(good), but that does not necessarily means the problem is solved
(bad). At most, what I tend to get is a kind of workaround (not too
bad, but could be better).


Maybe it just did not ringa bell when people read it.

That's the strange point about my feeling. It seems to ring the bell the first time, but not loud enough to follow up.

In the end it probably comesdown to how much time a developercan spend on tracking down
the bug you are seeing.If you can reduce that timeyou are more likely to get ananswer.

I try, but it is not always easy, if you don't have enough knowledge about internals.

OTOH, I know many users (myself included) seldom try to help others,
probably because of lack of time. But if users don't have time, why
should developers?-- Antonio


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23939] - document('relative-URI') seems to resolve wrongly depending on request-URI (SourceResolver?)

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23939.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23939





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 12:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=16605)
 -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16605action=view)
testcase (reconstructed from info in description)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28522] - fd:aggregatefield and fd:split pattern

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28522.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28522





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 12:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=16606)
 -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16606action=view)
Patch for AggregateField to check if the combined value matches the split
pattern

The problem is twofold:
1. The validation isn't done at all (patch fixes this)
2. Only the sub fields of the aggregate field are rendered, so any validation
error which is associated with the aggregate field itself has to be extracted
and displayed with separately. With the patch applied, you can use
ft:validation-error id=myaggregatefieldid/ to render only the validation
error (if there is one).

I also adapted the sample for the aggregate field to reflect this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30796] - exception when form has no action attribute

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30796.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30796





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 13:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=16607)
 -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16607action=view)
Checks if attributes are present

The patch adds some checking and throws an exception in case some attributes
are missing. The FormHandler catches the exception and throws a new
SAXException with location information so you know where it went wrong.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35811] - [html block] HTMLGenerator doesn't copy POST parameters

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35811.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35811





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 13:48 ---
/at the GT2005 Hackaton/

There would be still a need for a proper test cast/scenario for this issue.
Nevertheless a short exploration of the HTMLGenerator lead to two conclusions in
the subject of passing POST parameters (in addition to GET parameters) passed to
the Cocoon request that invoked this generator.

1. there is a chance of exceeding the GET request size limit that some servers
might still have. this chance also exists in the current implementation of the
HTMLGenerator as it concatenates the URI params from the Cocoon request and the
params in the src attribute passed to the generator in the sitemap

2. at first you might want to change the implementation of HTMLGenerator in a
simple manner, by changing: 

query.append(request.getQueryString());

to a loop iterating over the request.getParameterNames() and
request.getParameterValues()

BUT! this might lead to trouble as the request there is a Cocoon wrapper for the
real HTTPServletRequest object, and it's getParameterValues() implementation 
decodes this array of parameters before returning them. this might not be an
issue for the English language, but for many European languages this might break
the resulting URL. 

So the second conclusion is actually a tip that this bug (or call it a
restriction) can be overcome by adding a getRawParametersValues() method to the
request wrapper that simply returns the HTTPServletRequest.getParameterValues()
and iterating this array in the HTTPGenerator.setup instead of the
getQueryString() call.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33545] - [Enh] Make StatusGenerator show Cocoon version information

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33545.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33545





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 13:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=16608)
 -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16608action=view)
patch for the StatusGenerator.java in order to show the contents of WEB-INF/lib

patch for listing WEB-INF/lib directory contents, also added parameter lib in
order to hide the output for security reasons

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30796] - exception when form has no action attribute

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30796.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30796


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 14:01 ---
Thanks, applied. Please check and close.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33004] - Cocoon consumes 100% of CPU and never releases it

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33004.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33004


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution||LATER




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33004] - Cocoon consumes 100% of CPU and never releases it

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33004.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33004


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


[Docs] Semi-automatic update process of the Cocoon documentation

2005-10-06 Thread hepabolu
After talks to several people I feel we need a semi-automatic update 
process of the Cocoon documentation to cocoon.apache.org.


Several reasons:
- frequent updates show users that there is concern about their 
documentation wishes. We might even write documentation that answers 
FAQs and point the users to that, rather than rewriting the information 
on the mailing list.
- semi-automatic updates avoid the reinvention of the wheel for every 
committer trying to update the website and avoid the errors that created 
the current crippled site.
- the current Daisy on the cocoon.zones contains the most recent version 
of the documentation and provides an easier way of adding and updating 
the documentation.
- with the current update of Daisy, Daisy books have become available 
and allow the documentation to be exported as a book in both HTML and PDF.


New process:
- set up a small Cocoon branding website in the current xdocs section 
with only a few pages that contain relative static content. Compare it 
to the Springframework website.
- These pages contain links to the actual reference documentation which 
are available as Daisy book in both HTML (for browsing on the website) 
and in PDF (for downloading and printing).
- on cocoon.zones a Forrest configuration is setup with all the tweaks 
necessary to get the job done.
- a script is created that can do the Daisy books export, do the Forrest 
conversion and the upload on the cocoon.apache.org site and all the 
necessary steps in between.
- the end result of the script is that the documentation is available as 
a complete website on cocoon.apache.org AND for inclusion in the next 
Cocoon release.
- a secured button is available for committers to start this script. 
Whether it is available as a password protected page, a ssh command or 
whatever.
- a notification can be sent to the dev-list when the site update hasn't 
been done in X days.


WDYT?

It would be good to get the end result as described (but manual, rather 
than semi-automatic for now) ASAP for inclusion in the upcoming 2.1.8 
release.


Bye, Helma


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36949] - [PATCH] SendMailTransformer and HTML body

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36949


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |critical
Summary|SendMailTransformer and HTML|[PATCH] SendMailTransformer
   |body|and HTML body




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33545] - [PATCH] Make StatusGenerator show Cocoon version information

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33545.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33545


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[Enh] Make StatusGenerator  |[PATCH] Make StatusGenerator
   |show Cocoon version |show Cocoon version
   |information |information




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


Re: [Docs] Semi-automatic update process of the Cocoon documentation

2005-10-06 Thread Sylvain Wallez

hepabolu wrote:

After talks to several people I feel we need a semi-automatic update 
process of the Cocoon documentation to cocoon.apache.org.


Several reasons:
- frequent updates show users that there is concern about their 
documentation wishes. We might even write documentation that answers 
FAQs and point the users to that, rather than rewriting the 
information on the mailing list.



This last sentence is IMO a very good idea from the community point of 
view for both users and developers.
- users will be educated to search first in the docs, as we will have 
good and up to date docs, which is a kind of revolution :-)
- developers will have go to the docs in search of information, which 
will make them care more about it. One of the current problems is that 
devs don't really need docs and thus don't care much about it (as we say 
in France: far from the eyes is far from the heart).
- the documentation will be frequently updated based on user feeback and 
questions.


So this makes the documentation a part of the community conversations on 
the mailing-list. And this is very easy solution to help ensure it is 
kept up to date.


- semi-automatic updates avoid the reinvention of the wheel for every 
committer trying to update the website and avoid the errors that 
created the current crippled site.
- the current Daisy on the cocoon.zones contains the most recent 
version of the documentation and provides an easier way of adding and 
updating the documentation.
- with the current update of Daisy, Daisy books have become available 
and allow the documentation to be exported as a book in both HTML and 
PDF.


New process:
- set up a small Cocoon branding website in the current xdocs section 
with only a few pages that contain relative static content. Compare it 
to the Springframework website.
- These pages contain links to the actual reference documentation 
which are available as Daisy book in both HTML (for browsing on the 
website) and in PDF (for downloading and printing).
- on cocoon.zones a Forrest configuration is setup with all the tweaks 
necessary to get the job done.
- a script is created that can do the Daisy books export, do the 
Forrest conversion and the upload on the cocoon.apache.org site and 
all the necessary steps in between.
- the end result of the script is that the documentation is available 
as a complete website on cocoon.apache.org AND for inclusion in the 
next Cocoon release.
- a secured button is available for committers to start this script. 
Whether it is available as a password protected page, a ssh command or 
whatever.
- a notification can be sent to the dev-list when the site update 
hasn't been done in X days.



This last point ensure we don't let the website become obsolete, without 
having to setup some completely automated publication which isn't good 
as we must have a human oversight on what is published on the official 
website.



WDYT?



+1000 :-)

It would be good to get the end result as described (but manual, 
rather than semi-automatic for now) ASAP for inclusion in the upcoming 
2.1.8 release.



Another +1000. But we should not delay the release because of this, 
which probably means that the docs that will be shipped with 2.1.8 will 
not have a nice skin. But accurate information matters more than 
presentation.


Sylvain

--
Sylvain WallezAnyware Technologies
http://people.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com
Apache Software Foundation Member Research  Technology Director



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31275] - Add SitemapPathModule input module

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31275.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31275





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 14:55 ---
In bug 35435, Sylvain says:

The Environment object is internal to the Cocoon engine and the
CocoonComponentManager is for internal use only.

This makes the proposed input module a bad idea.
However, there seems to be no other way to get the absolute path to the current
sitemap (which may be mounted!).
If only an input module could have a source resolver, this would be easy to
implement.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27147] - Cocoon Forms field styling: selection lists with optgroups

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27147.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27147


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #10484|0   |1
is obsolete||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 15:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=16610)
 -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16610action=view)
Implements OptGroups in Static/Dynamic Selection lists for CForms

The patch implements optgroups for the current cforms trunk.
StaticSelectionList as well as the DynamicSelectionList now support it. Define
like this:

fd:selection-list
  fd:item value=fd:labelmylabel/fd:label/fd:item
  fd:optgroup
fd:labelgrouplabel/fd:label
fd:item value=1fd:labelsubitem 1/fd:label/fd:item
fd:item value=2fd:labelsubitem 2/fd:label/fd:item
  /fd:optgroup
/fd:selection-list

The forms-field-styling.xsl currently only renders optgroups and nested items
in  a dropdown list. Radio-/Checkboxes and output types are not implemented
yet.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25115] - [Roadmap] General review of all XML elements

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25115.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25115





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 15:12 ---
repeater-row = repeater-item

row might be misleading

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31813] - [Sample] DreamTeam (dependent widgets in a repeater)

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31813.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31813


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 15:29 ---
Shielding the vars from null fixes the problem and makes the content-view appear
again.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31813] - [Sample] DreamTeam (dependent widgets in a repeater)

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31813.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31813


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


Continuation Time-To-Live Config Not Being Honored

2005-10-06 Thread Daniel Curran
After experiencing some interesting behavior with Invalid Continuation 
Errors I have performed some tests and have found that no matter what I 
set the time-to-live value to in cocoon.xconf the continuations always 
expire after 10 minutes. Is the time-to-live attribute of the 
continuations-manager not being honored? Where is the default value of 
10 minutes being set?


Some more information based on the tests I ran is below.

It seems that the period and offset are being followed, I can see this 
in the log files, but the time to live is being ignored. The session is 
not timing out at 10 minutes. The session is set to 30 minutes and the 
log file for the session show the sessions ending correctly.


continuations-manager continuation-sharing-bug-compatible=false 
logger=flow.manager session-bound-continuations=true 
time-to-live=6

   expirations-check type=periodic
   offset3/offset
   period3/period
   /expirations-check
/continuations-manager

Every 30 seconds I see a continuation check being run, but it is 10 
minutes before the continuation is cleaned up.


continuations-manager continuation-sharing-bug-compatible=false 
logger=flow.manager session-bound-continuations=true 
time-to-live=180

   expirations-check type=periodic
   offset90/offset
   period90/period
   /expirations-check
/continuations-manager

These are the settings that I run with in my development environment. 30 
minutes time to live, with a 15 minute offset and period. When running 
with these settings, continuations are still deleted after 10 minutes. 
It is harder to observe this happening in this environment, as the 
period of 15 minutes can mask this.


To get a better picture I ran with

continuations-manager continuation-sharing-bug-compatible=false 
logger=flow.manager session-bound-continuations=true 
time-to-live=180

   expirations-check type=periodic
   offset6/offset
   period6/period
   /expirations-check
/continuations-manager

Still a 30 minute time-to-live, but a 1 minute offset and period. With 
these settings the continuations are cleaned up 10 minutes after they 
are created.


Thanks,
Dan



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36612] - [Link] OSN

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36612.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36612


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34015] - Cforms greek messages

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34015.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34015


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Introducing Guilder

2005-10-06 Thread Ugo Cei
Guilder is a little graphical interface whose aim is to simplify the 
life of Cocoon newbies by providing:


- easy selection of blocks and features, taking dependencies in due 
consideration

- starting the build
- starting and stopping Cocoon via Jetty

Most of the programming has been done by my colleague Daniele Madama 
(d.madama AT pronetics DOT it), who already introduced his work in this 
thread [1]. This is just a first, rough version, but we wanted to 
commit it as soon as possible, following the OSS mantra of release 
early, release often and what better occasion than the GetTogether to 
do it? Much work remains to be done, like for instance:


- polishing the UI
- stopping Jetty (does not work at the moment)
- showing the progress of the build in a window
- etc.

but now that the code is available, if you want to contribute you can 
check out the code from [2] and start hacking away. Just use ant to 
build it. It will copy a JAR file in Cocoon's directory (by default 
../../BRANCHES_2_1_X but you can ovveride it in guilder.properties) 
and you should then launch it by moving to Cocoon's home directory and 
running java -jar tools/lib/guilder.jar.


It is our hope that this tool will make Cocoon more popular by 
presenting a simpler approach than what is provided by the present 
installation procedure, which might scare some users away. Once it is 
sufficiently polished, we could simply distribute the jar together with 
every Cocoon release, as this is a simple addition that does not change 
in any other way the existing build.


Guilder is just for Cocoon 2.1. The configuration and build procedure 
in the coming major releases will be very different and won't probably 
need such a tool, but it is expected that many people will be working 
with 2.1 for a long time still.


Why the name Guilder?

The original name was Cocoon builder but soon it became something 
more than a simple builder. We also wanted to emphasize the GUI 
aspect. Since I am in Amsterdam right now, the name Guilder came up 
naturally. Guilder (gulden in Dutch) was the name of the Dutch 
currency before the Euro.


Ugo

[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=112722937629151w=2
[2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/whiteboard/guilder

--
Ugo Cei
Tech Blog: http://agylen.com/
Open Source Zone: http://oszone.org/
Wine  Food Blog: http://www.divinocibo.it/



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31275] - Add SitemapPathModule input module

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31275.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31275


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #12795|0   |1
is obsolete||




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


[VOTE] snapshot release of the bricks-cms example app

2005-10-06 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
I'd like to  put a snapshot of the bricks-cms [1] example on our 
download servers, so that people can get it without requiring an SVN 
client.


It is not a formal release, but I'd like to have the community's 
approval before doing it.


Please cast your votes, here's my own:
+1

-Bertrand

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/BricksCms




Problem with ESQL and Unicode

2005-10-06 Thread Berin Loritsch
Using ESQL against MSSQL Server, any NTEXT or NVARCHAR are incorrectly 
re-encoded to ISO 8859.


Directly using the driver yields the correct results.



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36251] - Cocoon 2.1.7 does not compile - in mysterious circumstances

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36251.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36251





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 17:24 ---
I got this same error with JDK 1.5.0_5, but it went away when I removed the
following jars from lib/ext:
avalon-framework-cvs-20020806.jar
batik.jar
fop.jar
jai_codec.jar
jai_core.jar
mlibwrapper_jai.jar
QTJava.zip
resolver.jar
saxon.jar
saxon653.jar
serializer.jar
xalan.jar
xalan25.jar
xercesImpl.jar
xml-apis.jar

For me, this was a user-configuration error. I don't know which jar was causing
the problem. Anyway, hope this helps.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Re: [Docs] Semi-automatic update process of the Cocoon documentation

2005-10-06 Thread Ross Gardler

hepabolu wrote:
After talks to several people I feel we need a semi-automatic update 
process of the Cocoon documentation to cocoon.apache.org.


snip what=details of proposal/

All sounds great, in fact, most of the automated publishing side an be 
done by the ForrestBot. See http://forrest.zones.apache.org/


The forrestbot can publish via various methods including SVN.

I just have to find the time to do the test build using Forrest+Daisy 
(should be in the next day or two).


Ross



Re: [VOTE] snapshot release of the bricks-cms example app

2005-10-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Bertrand Delacretaz schrieb:
 I'd like to  put a snapshot of the bricks-cms [1] example on our 
 download servers, so that people can get it without requiring an SVN 
 client.
 
 It is not a formal release, but I'd like to have the community's 
 approval before doing it.
 
 Please cast your votes, here's my own:
 +1
 
 -Bertrand
 
 [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/BricksCms
 
 
 
+1

(If you need some help, just let me know)

Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, SN AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/


[CForms] add-row widget

2005-10-06 Thread Thorsten Scherler
Hi all,

I am trying to invoke the add-row action from a custom jscript but I do
not know how.

I need to invoke the add-row action after some other steps on the client
side. I thought in just copying the transformed html code it would work,
but no.

I tried with something like:
a href=javascript:void(0)
onClick=forms_submitForm(document.getElementById('section.0.story.0.add'), 
'section.0.story.0.add')test/a

...but I get Error: forms_submitForm is not defined

On the other hand this is working fine when it is in the input /, so I
do not understand why it is not working in above code (I reckon it has
something to do with ajax, but not sure).

Is it possible to invoke the add-row action from custom jscript? If so
can somebody *please* give some hints. I am lost and spend the whole day
in try and error. :(

TIA for any hints

salu2
-- 
thorsten

Together we stand, divided we fall! 
Hey you (Pink Floyd)



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36954] New: - DELI Aspect Renderer for Cocoon Portal

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36954.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36954

   Summary: DELI Aspect Renderer for Cocoon Portal
   Product: Cocoon 2
   Version: Current SVN 2.2
  Platform: All
   URL: http://www.mail-
archive.com/users@cocoon.apache.org/msg29668.html
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P3
 Component: blocks
AssignedTo: dev@cocoon.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I developed an aspect renderer for cocoon portal. It is similar to XSLTAspect
but passes deli-capabilities parameter to the XSLT sheets used to render the
portal. Any comments?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36954] - DELI Aspect Renderer for Cocoon Portal

2005-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36954.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36954





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-10-06 19:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=16611)
 -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16611action=view)
Deli Aspect Renderer Class


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Cocoon Fat Test

2005-10-06 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Carsten hates me when I just talk, so here is some action: let's 
measure cocoon's fat.


Follow me and type the following in your terminal

 svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/ \
cocoon
 svn co http://simile.mit.edu/repository/linotype/trunk/ linotype
 export COCOON_HOME=../cocoon/
 cd linotype
 ant install
 ant run

then point your browser at http://127.0.0.1:/linotype/

you should see an empty linotype running.

Now, ctrl-break the above, and do

 zip -r linotype.war dist/

the resulting WAR is 12263572 bytes. How much of this is linotype?

 zip -r linotype.zip dist/linotype/

results in a 129673 bytes. Cocoon has a platform overhead of 11Mb. 
*compressed*


Now let's see where the things are:

 cd dist
 du -d1

returns

1152./linotype
144 ./resources
128 ./stylesheets
27472   ./WEB-INF
29000   .

so

 cd WEB-INF
 du -d1

returns

8   ./classes
1544./entities
25776   ./lib
27472   .

So, it's clear that cocoon weight is in the jars.

NOTE: the linotype build system builds cocoon from source with the most 
stripped-down version as Linotype does not depend on any blocks. This is 
the minimal 2.1.x cocoon possible right now.


Let's see the list of jars

 cd lib
 ls -AlS

(with some little hand cleaning)

2941481 jdtcore-3.0.2.jar
2730442 xalan-2.7.0.jar
1395202 cocoon-2.1.8-dev.jar
1203860 xercesImpl-2.7.1.jar
 607235 rhino1.5r4-continuations-R26.jar
 552263 commons-collections-3.1.jar
 522143 jakarta-bcel-20040329.jar
 394671 jcs-1.2.5-dev-20050313.jar
 358085 log4j-1.2.12.jar
 285104 commons-jxpath-1.2.jar
 225375 commons-httpclient-2.0.2.jar
 207723 commons-lang-2.1.jar
 194205 xml-apis-1.3.02.jar
 189284 util.concurrent-1.3.4.jar
 131458 commons-jexl-1.0.jar
 115506 excalibur-instrument-mgr-http-2.1.jar
  89145 excalibur-logger-2.1.jar
  86665 excalibur-xmlutil-2.1.jar
  83582 avalon-logkit-2.1.jar
  80572 excalibur-component-1.2.jar
  78599 excalibur-sourceresolve-2.1.jar
  65948 excalibur-naming-1.0.jar
  60047 xml-commons-resolver-1.1.jar
  59645 avalon-framework-impl-4.3.jar
  57548 excalibur-instrument-mgr-impl-2.1.jar
  47531 ehcache-1.1.jar
  42137 excalibur-store-2.1.jar
  40737 excalibur-io-1.1.jar
  38015 commons-logging-1.0.4.jar
  32112 avalon-framework-api-4.3.jar
  30117 commons-cli-1.0.jar
  28584 jakarta-regexp-1.4.jar
  27833 excalibur-pool-impl-2.1.jar
  21028 javacImpl-0.9.jar
  20640 excalibur-instrument-mgr-api-2.1.jar
  20328 excalibur-instrument-api-2.1.jar
  18329 excalibur-pool-instrumented-2.1.jar
  14728 excalibur-pool-api-2.1.jar
   8238 excalibur-i18n-1.1.jar
   3565 javacApi-0.9.jar

now, let's take a look

 1) I don't use XSP nor javaflow, therefore I wouldn't need JDTcore, 
nor BCEL, nor javacImpl and javacAPI, a total of several Mb.


 2) I don't use the avalon instrumentation

 3) I use logkit, so I don't need log4j

 4) I put the latest xalan and xerces in my app server, no need to have 
it here too


here is the slimmed down cocoon

1395202 cocoon-2.1.8-dev.jar
 607235 rhino1.5r4-continuations-R26.jar
 552263 commons-collections-3.1.jar
 285104 commons-jxpath-1.2.jar
 225375 commons-httpclient-2.0.2.jar
 207723 commons-lang-2.1.jar
 194205 xml-apis-1.3.02.jar
 189284 util.concurrent-1.3.4.jar
 131458 commons-jexl-1.0.jar
  89145 excalibur-logger-2.1.jar
  86665 excalibur-xmlutil-2.1.jar
  83582 avalon-logkit-2.1.jar
  80572 excalibur-component-1.2.jar
  78599 excalibur-sourceresolve-2.1.jar
  65948 excalibur-naming-1.0.jar
  60047 xml-commons-resolver-1.1.jar
  59645 avalon-framework-impl-4.3.jar
  47531 ehcache-1.1.jar
  42137 excalibur-store-2.1.jar
  40737 excalibur-io-1.1.jar
  38015 commons-logging-1.0.4.jar
  32112 avalon-framework-api-4.3.jar
  30117 commons-cli-1.0.jar
  28584 jakarta-regexp-1.4.jar
  27833 excalibur-pool-impl-2.1.jar
  18329 excalibur-pool-instrumented-2.1.jar
  14728 excalibur-pool-api-2.1.jar
   8238 excalibur-i18n-1.1.jar

which now yields a war file of 4Mb, still a lot but much better than before.

Anyway, I know some of this has been discussed at lenght on the mail 
list already, so I tried cocoon 2.2.x to see if things are improving, 
let's redo the little dance:


 svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk/ cocoon
 svn co http://simile.mit.edu/repository/linotype/trunk/ linotype
 export COCOON_HOME=../cocoon/
 cd linotype
 ant war

results in a 11516061 file, which is better than before, well, let's see 
if it works


 ant run

does cocoon work? [open http://127.0.0.1:/] yes it does.

does linotype work? [open http://127.0.0.1:/linotype/] nope

Type 'jx' does not exist for 'map:transform' at, let's see the sitemap

 map:components

   !-- include some additional components --
   map:include dir=context://WEB-INF/sitemap-additions 
pattern=*.xconf/


 /map:components

ah, ok, cool, now the components are located somewhere else, let's see 
the sitemap-additions


map:components xmlns:map=http://apache.org/cocoon/sitemap/1.0;
  map:generators
  	map:generator 

Re: Continuation Time-To-Live Config Not Being Honored

2005-10-06 Thread Leszek Gawron

Daniel Curran wrote:
After experiencing some interesting behavior with Invalid Continuation 
Errors I have performed some tests and have found that no matter what I 
set the time-to-live value to in cocoon.xconf the continuations always 
expire after 10 minutes. Is the time-to-live attribute of the 
continuations-manager not being honored? Where is the default value of 
10 minutes being set?

Thanks for reporting. I'll check that first thing in the morning.

--
Leszek Gawron  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67  http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812   fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65


Re: [VOTE] snapshot release of the bricks-cms example app

2005-10-06 Thread Andrew Savory

Hi,

On 6 Oct 2005, at 15:07, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:

I'd like to  put a snapshot of the bricks-cms [1] example on our  
download servers, so that people can get it without requiring an  
SVN client.


+1


Andrew.

--
Andrew Savory, Managing Director, Luminas Limited
Tel: +44 (0)870 741 6658  Fax: +44 (0)700 598 1135
Web: http://www.luminas.co.uk/
Orixo alliance: http://www.orixo.com/



[cforms] template.jx vs. jx-macros.xml

2005-10-06 Thread Mark Lundquist
Why do we still have 
src/blocks/forms/java/org/apache/cocoon/forms/generation/template.jx in 
BRANCH_2_1_X?  Isn't it time to get rid of it?

—ml—



Re: Cocoon Fat Test

2005-10-06 Thread Torsten Curdt
With a serious diet and an improved build system, cocoon could lose  
half of its weight and generate webapps that are much more friendly  
for smaller sites or for inclusion in places where size is an issue.


But even when size is not an issue, having smaller webapps helps in  
making users perceive what core functionality the cocoon framework  
gives them and what is add-on, something that we were never very  
good at marketing.


...one of the things I gonna tell the people on my talk (aside):
strip down the baby - otherwise it's a pain. It would be
more than nice if the build system would take care of that.
Maybe even http://proguard.sourceforge.net can help with it
...but in theory our build system should be smart enough
to take care of this.

AND ...I am way in favor of shipping with a minimal installation
instead of a cocoon-can-everything-lets-show-it configuration.
We passed that size. TBH I think the complexity more scares people
away than it helps.
Let's get them a clean and simple ...minimal sitemap to start
with and then improve the documentation you need this? - add that

My 2 cents
--
Torsten


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Docs] Semi-automatic update process of the Cocoon documentation

2005-10-06 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote:
 hepabolu wrote:
 After talks to several people I feel we need a semi-automatic update 
 process of the Cocoon documentation to cocoon.apache.org.

We have always needed this, but not possible with the
current setup of the project publishing mechanism at apache.org
If committers want to help, then subscribe to site-dev at a.o

 snip what=details of proposal/
 
 All sounds great, in fact, most of the automated publishing side an be 
 done by the ForrestBot. See http://forrest.zones.apache.org/
 
 The forrestbot can publish via various methods including SVN.

Yes it can. However there are issues.

Apache projects store the generated documents in SVN
and they are 'svn checkout' on the server to create
the website.

The forrestbot on our zone cannot automatically commit
them to the Cocoon SVN because forrestbot has no svn account.
It is not a committer.

All that forrestbot can do is to generate them on to
the server  (i.e. a staging area) but that does not
get them published onto the actual server. Hence the
site-dev discussion list is addressing this and other
site publishing issues.

Note that our zone is still very basic, only me working
there occasionally. We don't even use the zone forrestbot
for the Forrest project yet (just doing some useful
continuous build and error reporting so far).

For Forrest's own website, the committers use a local
forrestbot. Two easy commands and a publish is done:
'build; deploy'. Then we have a cronjob on the server
to do 'svn update'.
See forrest-trunk/etc/publishing_our_site.txt

That is the method that i recommend at this stage.

-David

 I just have to find the time to do the test build using Forrest+Daisy 
 (should be in the next day or two).
 
 Ross


Re: Continuation Time-To-Live Config Not Being Honored

2005-10-06 Thread Kris Schneider
I work with Dan and here's the rest of the story:

We ran into severe enough problems using flowscript on WebLogic 8.1
(Rhino issues, really), that we had to switch to Java flow. As we've
gone down that road, we've come to the realization that all of our
continuations seem to have a time to live of ten minutes, regardless
of how we configure the continuations-manager element in
cocoon.xconf. As it turns out, JavaInterpreter uses a hard-coded,
non-configurable value of 60 for continuation time to live. Have
we missed anything with regard to being able to configure that aspect
of JavaInterpreter?

During our investigation of the time to live issue, we also came
across some concurrency issues with ContinuationsManagerImpl. This
class uses the following to store/manage continuations:

protected SortedSet expirations =
Collections.synchronizedSortedSet(new TreeSet());

There are a couple of places where that collection is iterated by doing:

Iterator i = expirations.iterator();
while (...) {
  // use i
}

This really should be changed to something like this:

synchronized(expirations) {
  Iterator i = expirations.iterator();
  while (...) {
// use i
  }
}

This advice is contained within the Javadoc for
Collections.synchronizedSortedSet.

http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/api/java/util/Collections.html#synchronizedSortedSet(java.util.SortedSet)

Some other references worth reading:

http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/api/java/util/Iterator.html#remove()

http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/api/java/util/ConcurrentModificationException.html

Having said that, it seems like someone would have been screaming by
now about continuation management being horribly broken. So, is Java
flow just not being used, or used under such low levels of concurrency
that the problem hasn't surfaced yet? Or is our analysis of the code
just incorrect?

Thanks for any additional insight.

On 10/6/05, Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Daniel Curran wrote:
  After experiencing some interesting behavior with Invalid Continuation
  Errors I have performed some tests and have found that no matter what I
  set the time-to-live value to in cocoon.xconf the continuations always
  expire after 10 minutes. Is the time-to-live attribute of the
  continuations-manager not being honored? Where is the default value of
  10 minutes being set?
 Thanks for reporting. I'll check that first thing in the morning.

 --
 Leszek Gawron  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IT Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o.
 +48 (61) 855 06 67  http://www.mobilebox.pl
 mobile: +48 (501) 720 812   fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65


--
Kris Schneider mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project cocoon (in module cocoon) failed

2005-10-06 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage...

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For 
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, 
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Project cocoon has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 55 projects.
The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'.
For reference only, the following projects are affected by this:
- cocoon :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-ajax :  Ajax - Utilities and resources for Ajax applications.
- cocoon-block-apples :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-asciiart :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-authentication-fw :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-axis :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-batik :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-bsf :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-captcha :  Utilites to generate simple CAPTCHAs
- cocoon-block-chaperon :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-core-samples-additional :  Additional core samples.
- cocoon-block-core-samples-main :  Main core samples.
- cocoon-block-cron :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-databases :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-deli :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-eventcache :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-fop :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-forms :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-hsqldb :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-html :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-itext :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-javaflow :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-jcr :  A jcr: protocol for Cocoon
- cocoon-block-jfor :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-jms :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-jsp :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-linkrewriter :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-lucene :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-midi :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-naming :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-ojb :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-paranoid :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-petstore :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-profiler :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-proxy :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-python :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-qdox :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-querybean :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-repository :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-serializers :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-session-fw :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-slop :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-spring-app :  A demo for Spring and Cocoon
- cocoon-block-stx :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-taglib :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-template :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-tour :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-validation :  In-pipeline validation of documents
- cocoon-block-velocity :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-web3 :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-xmldb :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-xsp :  Java XML Framework
- forrest :  Apache Forrest is an XML standards-oriented documentation fr...
- forrest-test :  Apache Forrest is an XML standards-oriented documentation 
fr...
- lenya :  Content Management System


Full details are available at:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/cocoon/cocoon/index.html

That said, some information snippets are provided here.

The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were 
provided:
 -DEBUG- Output [cocoon.jar] identifier set to output basename: [cocoon]
 -DEBUG- Output [cocoon-testcase.jar] identifier set to output basename: 
[cocoon-testcase]
 -DEBUG- Output [cocoon-deprecated.jar] identifier set to output basename: 
[cocoon-deprecated]
 -INFO- Made directory 
[/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/cocoon/build/cocoon-06102005/test]
 -INFO- Failed with reason build failed
 -INFO- Project Reports in: 
/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/cocoon/build/cocoon-06102005/test/output
 -WARNING- No directory 
[/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/cocoon/build/cocoon-06102005/test/output]
 -INFO- Failed to extract fallback artifacts from Gump Repository



The following work was performed:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/cocoon/cocoon/gump_work/build_cocoon_cocoon.html
Work Name: build_cocoon_cocoon (Type: Build)
Work ended in a state of : Failed
Elapsed: 18 secs
Command Line: java -Djava.awt.headless=true 
-Xbootclasspath/p:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-commons/java/external/build/xml-apis.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xerces2/java/build/xercesImpl.jar
 org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dgump.merge=/x1/gump/public/gump/work/merge.xml 
-Dbuild.sysclasspath=only 
-Dlogkit.jar=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/avalon-trunk/runtime/logkit/target/deliverables/jars/avalon-logkit-06102005.jar
 -Dbuild=build/cocoon-06102005 gump-core 
[Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/cocoon]
CLASSPATH: 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project cocoon (in module cocoon) failed

2005-10-06 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage...

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For 
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, 
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Project cocoon has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 55 projects.
The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'.
For reference only, the following projects are affected by this:
- cocoon :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-ajax :  Ajax - Utilities and resources for Ajax applications.
- cocoon-block-apples :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-asciiart :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-authentication-fw :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-axis :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-batik :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-bsf :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-captcha :  Utilites to generate simple CAPTCHAs
- cocoon-block-chaperon :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-core-samples-additional :  Additional core samples.
- cocoon-block-core-samples-main :  Main core samples.
- cocoon-block-cron :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-databases :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-deli :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-eventcache :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-fop :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-forms :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-hsqldb :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-html :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-itext :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-javaflow :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-jcr :  A jcr: protocol for Cocoon
- cocoon-block-jfor :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-jms :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-jsp :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-linkrewriter :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-lucene :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-midi :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-naming :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-ojb :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-paranoid :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-petstore :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-profiler :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-proxy :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-python :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-qdox :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-querybean :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-repository :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-serializers :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-session-fw :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-slop :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-spring-app :  A demo for Spring and Cocoon
- cocoon-block-stx :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-taglib :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-template :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-tour :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-validation :  In-pipeline validation of documents
- cocoon-block-velocity :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-web3 :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-xmldb :  Java XML Framework
- cocoon-block-xsp :  Java XML Framework
- forrest :  Apache Forrest is an XML standards-oriented documentation fr...
- forrest-test :  Apache Forrest is an XML standards-oriented documentation 
fr...
- lenya :  Content Management System


Full details are available at:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/cocoon/cocoon/index.html

That said, some information snippets are provided here.

The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were 
provided:
 -DEBUG- Output [cocoon.jar] identifier set to output basename: [cocoon]
 -DEBUG- Output [cocoon-testcase.jar] identifier set to output basename: 
[cocoon-testcase]
 -DEBUG- Output [cocoon-deprecated.jar] identifier set to output basename: 
[cocoon-deprecated]
 -INFO- Made directory 
[/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/cocoon/build/cocoon-06102005/test]
 -INFO- Failed with reason build failed
 -INFO- Project Reports in: 
/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/cocoon/build/cocoon-06102005/test/output
 -WARNING- No directory 
[/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/cocoon/build/cocoon-06102005/test/output]
 -INFO- Failed to extract fallback artifacts from Gump Repository



The following work was performed:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/cocoon/cocoon/gump_work/build_cocoon_cocoon.html
Work Name: build_cocoon_cocoon (Type: Build)
Work ended in a state of : Failed
Elapsed: 18 secs
Command Line: java -Djava.awt.headless=true 
-Xbootclasspath/p:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-commons/java/external/build/xml-apis.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xerces2/java/build/xercesImpl.jar
 org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dgump.merge=/x1/gump/public/gump/work/merge.xml 
-Dbuild.sysclasspath=only 
-Dlogkit.jar=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/avalon-trunk/runtime/logkit/target/deliverables/jars/avalon-logkit-06102005.jar
 -Dbuild=build/cocoon-06102005 gump-core 
[Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/cocoon]
CLASSPATH: