Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-29 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò

On 29/mar/10, at 00:10, Cédric Damioli wrote:


[...]

BTW, for the records (and eventually some who use it page), here  
at Anyware, we build an Open Source CMS around Cocoon 2.1, called  
Ametys (http://www.ametys.org), which is currently in its 3.0 beta  
version, also leveraging JCR-Jackrabbit, Lucene and OSWorkflow.

We currently have about 50 live systems, handling 2+ web sites.
So we'll continue to use and support Cocoon for many years !


Hei, this is very interesting to know :-)
I really would like to see how you dealt with implementation of JCR- 
related components!
I tried to access [1] with no success, could you point me to a  
subversion repository? Thanks.


Cheers.

[1] http://viewvc.ametys.org/viewvc/ametys/trunk/cms/trunk



Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-29 Thread Cédric Damioli




Hi Francesco,

Sorry for the broken URL.
You have access to the SVN here : https://svn.ametys.org and to the
viewvc here : http://viewvc.ametys.org
For JCR details, its quite off topic here, but feel free to ask if you
have any questions

Regards,
Cdric

Le 29/03/2010 09:10, Francesco Chicchiricc a crit:
On 29/mar/10, at 00:10, Cdric Damioli wrote:
  
  
  [...]


BTW, for the records (and eventually some "who use it" page), here at
Anyware, we build an Open Source CMS around Cocoon 2.1, called Ametys
(http://www.ametys.org), which is currently in its "3.0 beta" version,
also leveraging JCR-Jackrabbit, Lucene and OSWorkflow.

We currently have about 50 live systems, handling 2+ web sites.

So we'll continue to use and support Cocoon for many years !

  
  
Hei, this is very interesting to know :-)
  
I really would like to see how you dealt with implementation of
JCR-related components!
  
I tried to access [1] with no success, could you point me to a
subversion repository? Thanks.
  
  
Cheers.
  
  
[1] http://viewvc.ametys.org/viewvc/ametys/trunk/cms/trunk
  
  


-- 


  

   
  
  www.anyware-services.com
  
  
  

  
 
Cdric Damioli
 
Directeur technique
cedric.dami...@anyware-services.com
Tel : +33(0)5 62 19 19 07
Mob : +33(0)6 87 03 61 63
Fax : +33(0)5 61 75 84 12
Adresse : Innopole 13 - L'Occitane - B.P 97672 - 31676 LABEGE CEDEX -
France 

Ametys: le CMS Web Java Open Source
 www.ametys.org 

  

  
  

  

Ce
message et toutes les pices jointes (le "Message") sont confidentiels
et tablis  l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires.
Toute modification, dition, utilisation ou diffusion non autorise est
interdite.
Anyware Services dcline
toute responsabilit au titre de ce Message s'il a t altr, dform,
falsifi ou dit, diffus sans autorisation.





Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-28 Thread Cédric Damioli




Hi all,

Now that I know that the 2.1 community is alive and healthy, I'll begin
to send various patches I've collected during the last few years :-)

First of all, may someone review and eventually apply
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2286 ?
It's a very small patch allowing users of serializers-block to start
Cocoon from a directory which path contains spaces (such as "C:\Program
Files")

BTW, for the records (and eventually some "who use it" page), here at
Anyware, we build an Open Source CMS around Cocoon 2.1, called Ametys
(http://www.ametys.org), which is currently in its "3.0 beta" version,
also leveraging JCR-Jackrabbit, Lucene and OSWorkflow.
We currently have about 50 live systems, handling 2+ web sites.
So we'll continue to use and support Cocoon for many years !

Regards,
Cdric

Le 23/03/2010 10:52, Sylvain Wallez a crit:
David
Crossley wrote:
  
  Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:


Cdric Damioli wrote:
  

  ...I'm wondering if someone around here
was still willing to maintain the

Cocoon-2.1 branch ?

If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us,
and I

don't want to have to fork it in our own repository

 
I'm +1 on someone maintaining the 2.1 branch and cutting releases as
needed.
  
  
I don't use Cocoon anymore, but some of the projects that I created
  
with 2.1.x a few years ago are still running very well and maintained,
  
though more at the application level where they probably don't need
  
changes to Cocoon itself.
  
  
I think 2.1.x is stable enough for people who use it to stay on that
  
version, so maintaining it makes at lot of sense.
  
  
Are there any current committers willing to help maintain it?
  
 

Yes, i will play a part. I can certainly help with the release

process.


I have tried on various occasions to apply some of the

outstanding patches, but had difficulty.


It would need the help of others.

 
  
I still have a pretty good memory of Cocoon 2.1.x internals, and can
help to review/apply patches. But I can't do any test on a real world
application, so will need help from the user community before we can
make a release.
  
  
Sylvain
  
  


-- 


  

   
  
  www.anyware-services.com
  
  
  

  
 
Cdric Damioli
 
Directeur technique
cedric.dami...@anyware-services.com
Tel : +33(0)5 62 19 19 07
Mob : +33(0)6 87 03 61 63
Fax : +33(0)5 61 75 84 12
Adresse : Innopole 13 - L'Occitane - B.P 97672 - 31676 LABEGE CEDEX -
France 

Ametys: le CMS Web Java Open Source
 www.ametys.org 

  

  
  

  

Ce
message et toutes les pices jointes (le "Message") sont confidentiels
et tablis  l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires.
Toute modification, dition, utilisation ou diffusion non autorise est
interdite.
Anyware Services dcline
toute responsabilit au titre de ce Message s'il a t altr, dform,
falsifi ou dit, diffus sans autorisation.





Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-24 Thread Antonio Gallardo
El 23/03/10 16:41, Alfred Nathaniel escribió:
   
 BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ?

 Best regards,
 Cédric Damioli
   
 At my daytime job I am also still running a number of high-profile
 websites with Cocoon 2.1.10.  So I am very much interested in continuing
 the 2.1.x branch.

 But could we agree that JDK1.5 should be the minimum for that future
 2.1.12 release?
   
+1

We also still have some applications running on Cocoon. I agree a
release is missing, but the trunk is pretty stable. I would like to add
a GSoC project to finish dojo update in 2.1. Perhaps Jeremy can help us
with this.

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo.

 Cheers, Alfred.
   



Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-24 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò

On 23/03/10 16:41, Alfred Nathaniel wrote:


BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ?

Best regards,
Cédric Damioli


+1
We have several applications based on Cocoon 2.1, ranging from 2.17 to  
2.1.11, especially in JSR-168 portlet environments.
We also submitted some patches about that, unfortunately without any  
feedback :(


Regards.



RE: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Laurent Medioni
Hi Cédric,
We have a lot of alive and kicking deployments of our applications in many 
sites across the World. A lot of older 2.1.5 but we managed to migrate our most 
recent versions to 2.1.11 (and BTW removing most of the patches we had to apply 
to 2.1.5, painful but worth it).
2.1.11 proves to be a very stable platform for what we use it (XSPs with 
multiple output formats, i18n, currently removing the Flowscript used for our 
in-house pageflow implementation, as the last expensive-and-not-that-useful 
feature)

So you are not alone ;)
Laurent

-Original Message-
From: Cédric Damioli [mailto:cedric.dami...@anyware-services.com] 
Sent: lundi, 22. mars 2010 20:23
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

Hi Cocoon community,

Here at Anyware, we have dozens of Cocoon-2.1 based applications in 
production.
We've hacked Cocoon a lot, so that migrating to most recent releases of 
Cocoon is not an option for us at the moment
Cocoon 2.1 is a *very* stable framework, especially the core, but I 
recently came across a bug and discovered that, even if I provide a 
patch, there will be nobody to commit it, let alone release the next 
2.1.12 maintenance version.
Diving in the ML archives, I discovered than Carsten, the last 2.1 
release manager, resigned from the job almost two years ago [1], and 
that nobody took over.

So I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain 
the Cocoon-2.1 branch ?
If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, 
and I don't want to have to fork it in our own repository.
Otherwise, do you have other solutions for me ?

BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ?

Best regards,
Cédric Damioli

[1] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cocoon-dev/200805.mbox/%3c483cf62f.3000...@apache.org%3e

-- 
Cédric Damioli
RD director
Ametys CMS
ANYWARE SERVICES
Tel : +33 (0)5 61 00 73 47
Mob : +33 (0)6 87 03 61 63
Fax : +33 (0)5 61 00 51 46
http://www.anyware-services.com
http://www.ametys.org





• This email and any files transmitted with it are CONFIDENTIAL and intended
  solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
• Any unauthorized copying, disclosure, or distribution of the material within
  this email is strictly forbidden.
• Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely those of the
  author and do not necessarily represent those of Odyssey Financial
Technologies SA unless otherwise specifically stated.
• An electronic message is not binding on its sender. Any message referring to
  a binding engagement must be confirmed in writing and duly signed.
• If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately
  and delete the original.


Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Cédric,

2010/3/22 Cédric Damioli cedric.dami...@anyware-services.com:
 ...I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the
 Cocoon-2.1 branch ?
 If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, and I
 don't want to have to fork it in our own repository

I'm +1 on someone maintaining the 2.1 branch and cutting releases as needed.

I don't use Cocoon anymore, but some of the projects that I created
with 2.1.x a few years ago are still running very well and maintained,
though more at the application level where they probably don't need
changes to Cocoon itself.

I think 2.1.x is stable enough for people who use it to stay on that
version, so maintaining it makes at lot of sense.

Are there any current committers willing to help maintain it?
If not we might need to elect some new ones based on who's currently
contributing in this area.

-Bertrand


Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread David Crossley
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
 Cédric Damioli wrote:
 
  ...I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the
  Cocoon-2.1 branch ?
  If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, and I
  don't want to have to fork it in our own repository
 
 I'm +1 on someone maintaining the 2.1 branch and cutting releases as needed.
 
 I don't use Cocoon anymore, but some of the projects that I created
 with 2.1.x a few years ago are still running very well and maintained,
 though more at the application level where they probably don't need
 changes to Cocoon itself.
 
 I think 2.1.x is stable enough for people who use it to stay on that
 version, so maintaining it makes at lot of sense.
 
 Are there any current committers willing to help maintain it?

Yes, i will play a part. I can certainly help with the release
process.

I have tried on various occasions to apply some of the
outstanding patches, but had difficulty.

It would need the help of others.

 If not we might need to elect some new ones based on who's currently
 contributing in this area.

That should be happening anyway.

-David


Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Sylvain Wallez

David Crossley wrote:

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
  

Cédric Damioli wrote:


...I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain the
Cocoon-2.1 branch ?
If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, and I
don't want to have to fork it in our own repository
  

I'm +1 on someone maintaining the 2.1 branch and cutting releases as needed.

I don't use Cocoon anymore, but some of the projects that I created
with 2.1.x a few years ago are still running very well and maintained,
though more at the application level where they probably don't need
changes to Cocoon itself.

I think 2.1.x is stable enough for people who use it to stay on that
version, so maintaining it makes at lot of sense.

Are there any current committers willing to help maintain it?



Yes, i will play a part. I can certainly help with the release
process.

I have tried on various occasions to apply some of the
outstanding patches, but had difficulty.

It would need the help of others.
  


I still have a pretty good memory of Cocoon 2.1.x internals, and can 
help to review/apply patches. But I can't do any test on a real world 
application, so will need help from the user community before we can 
make a release.


Sylvain

--
Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net



Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 20:22 +0100, Cédric Damioli wrote:
 Hi Cocoon community,
...
 So I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain 
 the Cocoon-2.1 branch ?

Apache Forrest and Apache Lenya are still based on cocoon 2.1.x. Both
communities devs are normally subscribed to here as well. Apache Lenya
is far from switching away from 2.1.x so there are still some souls
around here that have commit access here as well.

 If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, 
 and I don't want to have to fork it in our own repository.
 Otherwise, do you have other solutions for me ?

That is awesome news and we always need new volunteers here. As I can
see the other responses most of all we need beta tester of releases and
patch supplier. 

salu2

 
 BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ?
 
 Best regards,
 Cédric Damioli
 
 [1] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cocoon-dev/200805.mbox/%3c483cf62f.3000...@apache.org%3e
 
-- 
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions

Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad 
de la Información, S.A.U. (SADESI)






Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Alec Bickerton


Cédric Damioli wrote:

Hi Cocoon community,

Here at Anyware, we have dozens of Cocoon-2.1 based applications in 
production.
We've hacked Cocoon a lot, so that migrating to most recent releases of 
Cocoon is not an option for us at the moment
Cocoon 2.1 is a *very* stable framework, especially the core, but I 
recently came across a bug and discovered that, even if I provide a 
patch, there will be nobody to commit it, let alone release the next 
2.1.12 maintenance version.
Diving in the ML archives, I discovered than Carsten, the last 2.1 
release manager, resigned from the job almost two years ago [1], and 
that nobody took over.


So I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain 
the Cocoon-2.1 branch ?
If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, 
and I don't want to have to fork it in our own repository.

Otherwise, do you have other solutions for me ?

BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ?



Trust me, you are not alone. We are still using cocoon 2.1.9 for some 
fairly large deployments. Some of these deployments are in dialy use by 
the large multinationals so our trusty cocoon system will be with us for 
quite some time.


+1 from me and I'd also be willing to help maintain.

Alec,


Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-23 Thread Alfred Nathaniel

  
  BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ?
  
  Best regards,
  Cédric Damioli

At my daytime job I am also still running a number of high-profile
websites with Cocoon 2.1.10.  So I am very much interested in continuing
the 2.1.x branch.

But could we agree that JDK1.5 should be the minimum for that future
2.1.12 release?

Cheers, Alfred.



[2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-22 Thread Cédric Damioli

Hi Cocoon community,

Here at Anyware, we have dozens of Cocoon-2.1 based applications in 
production.
We've hacked Cocoon a lot, so that migrating to most recent releases of 
Cocoon is not an option for us at the moment
Cocoon 2.1 is a *very* stable framework, especially the core, but I 
recently came across a bug and discovered that, even if I provide a 
patch, there will be nobody to commit it, let alone release the next 
2.1.12 maintenance version.
Diving in the ML archives, I discovered than Carsten, the last 2.1 
release manager, resigned from the job almost two years ago [1], and 
that nobody took over.


So I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to maintain 
the Cocoon-2.1 branch ?
If not, I volunteer to do the job, as this branch is important for us, 
and I don't want to have to fork it in our own repository.

Otherwise, do you have other solutions for me ?

BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ?

Best regards,
Cédric Damioli

[1] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cocoon-dev/200805.mbox/%3c483cf62f.3000...@apache.org%3e


--
Cédric Damioli
RD director
Ametys CMS
ANYWARE SERVICES
Tel : +33 (0)5 61 00 73 47
Mob : +33 (0)6 87 03 61 63
Fax : +33 (0)5 61 00 51 46
http://www.anyware-services.com
http://www.ametys.org




Re: [2.1] Is Cocoon 2.1.x officially dead ?

2010-03-22 Thread Peter Hunsberger
2010/3/22 Cédric Damioli cedric.dami...@anyware-services.com:

 So I'm wondering if someone around here was still willing to
 maintain the Cocoon-2.1 branch ? If not, I volunteer to do the
 job, as this branch is important for us, and I don't want to have
 to fork it in our own repository. Otherwise, do you have other
 solutions for me ?

 BTW, is there still many Cocoon-2.1 users around here ?


Not sure who might be able to do a commit, in theory I could, but
we're no where close to current on 2.1 and I really don't have time to
bring up a current version and test.  Have you submitted the patch?
If it's a trivial I'm pretty sure someone should be able to look at
it, and maybe even if it's big.

We are using 2.1, but we're still on 2.1.8.

-- 
Peter Hunsberger