Re: DRAFT Board report
Henri Yandell wrote: > Releases from JIRA (from my Commons Dashboard): > > Commons Pool 1.5.420/Nov/09 > Commons Email 1.2 12/Nov/09 > Commons DbUtils 1.3 12/Nov/09 > Commons Exec 1.0.1 12/Nov/09 > Commons BeanUtils 1.8.2 12/Nov/09 > Commons BeanUtils 1.8.1 20/Oct/09 > Commons Pool 1.5.3 23/Sep/09 > > Few missing on your list. > > [A few were missing in JIRA too - I had to go 'release' Exec, Email > and Pool 1.5.4 :) ] > > Makes me want to add a 'releases in last 3 months' flag to the Latest > Releases portlet. Also an 'Activity in last 3 months' portlet. > Speaking of: > > JIRA: 188 issues created; 69 of them resolved. > JIRA: 67 issues created before the last report are resolved. (For a > total of 136 resolved). > SVN commits: 1314 > dev emails: 1169 > user emails: 349 > > Worthless numbers - I was just interested in how easy it was to find > (which was very easy with markmail, svnsearch and a few JIRA filters). Thanks, Henri! Phil > > Hen > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> Sorry for short notice, but I need to get this out tomorrow to hit >> board mtg SLA. Quick comments / review appreciated. Last report was >> 13-Sept. Thx. -Phil >> >> >> Apache Commons Board Report, December, 2009 >> >> General >> === >> >> o Continued healthy activity across multiple components and >> responsiveness on both dev and user lists. >> o New primitives sandbox component started >> o Voted to sponsor incubation of agimatec-validation, an >> implementation of JSR 303, the bean validation framework. >> (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal). >> >> Releases >> >> >> o Dbutils 1.3 >>http://markmail.org/message/3gdxb4bneto7hj7r >> o Exec 1.0.1 >>http://markmail.org/message/eqvg2sutflizasnf >> o Email 1.2 >>http://markmail.org/message/fcpz7nlpiv2xa7zg >> o Pool 1.5.3 >>http://markmail.org/message/7jmcva3kho7ngnv6 >> o Pool 1.5.4 >>http://markmail.org/message/gmhpz4zsuv2f2jap >> >> >> Community >> = >> o New Sandbox committers >>- Benson Margulies >> o No new committers >> o No new PMC members >> >> -Phil Steitz (on behalf of Apache Commons PMC) >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [dbcp] 1.3/1.4 RC1 available for review
Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Phil Steitz wrote: > >> I have prepared release candidates for DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. Please all >> interested parties have a look and test. If all goes well, I will >> kick off a release VOTE based on these artifacts in the next couple >> of days. I see these as really two sets of artifacts associated >> with one release, so I am inclined to just do one VOTE including >> both versions. If anyone disagrees with this, please speak up. I >> am happy to run two VOTEs. >> >> 1.3 (JDBC 3) version: >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/dbcp-1.3-rc1 >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/dbcp-1.3-rc1/site >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/dbcp-1.3-rc1/maven >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/dbcp/tags/DBCP_1_3_RC1/ > > Like Nial I changed geronimo-jta_1.1_spec to version 1.1. My compiler zoo > fails though for blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03, jrockit-jdk-1.4.2.16 and sun- > jdk-1.4.2.19. IMHO you must update the xerces version to a release that > contains the driver implementation in the Java-SPI (META-INF/services): > > == %< > Test set: org.apache.commons.jocl.TestJOCLContentHandler > --- > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.047 sec > <<< FAILURE! > testObject(org.apache.commons.jocl.TestJOCLContentHandler) Time elapsed: > 0.006 sec > testPrimitives(org.apache.commons.jocl.TestJOCLContentHandler) Time > elapsed: 0 sec > testParse(org.apache.commons.jocl.TestJOCLContentHandler) Time elapsed: > 0.028 sec <<< ERROR! > org.xml.sax.SAXException: System property org.xml.sax.driver not specified > at > org.xml.sax.helpers.XMLReaderFactory.createXMLReader(XMLReaderFactory.java:90) > at > org.apache.commons.jocl.JOCLContentHandler.parse(JOCLContentHandler.java:339) > at > org.apache.commons.jocl.JOCLContentHandler.parse(JOCLContentHandler.java:271) > at > org.apache.commons.jocl.TestJOCLContentHandler.testParse(TestJOCLContentHandler.java:255) I don't get this one. Works fine on Apple 1.4.2 jdk. I am struggling to get a box setup where I can get Sun JDKs installed. I would appreciate any suggestions on how to fix this. > == %< > > Using IBM-JDK 1.4.2.13 the build and all tests with Ant 1.6.5 succeed, but I > get nevertheless those exceptions, I do not see, when running the other JDKs > with Maven: > > == %< > [junit] org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedTrace$AbandonedObjectException: > DBCP object created 2009-12-08 23:03:07 by the following code was never > closed: > > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedTrace.setStackTrace(AbandonedTrace.java:138) > > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedObjectPool.borrowObject(AbandonedObjectPool.java:81) > > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolingDataSource.getConnection(PoolingDataSource.java:106) > > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource.getConnection(BasicDataSource.java:1044) > > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.TestAbandonedBasicDataSource.testAbandoned(TestAbandonedBasicDataSource.java:65) These are harmless, exceptions are expected. > == %< > > == %< > [junit] org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedTrace$AbandonedObjectException: > DBCP object created 2009-12-08 23:03:07 by the following code was never > closed: > > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedTrace.setStackTrace(AbandonedTrace.java:138) > > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedObjectPool.borrowObject(AbandonedObjectPool.java:81) > > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolingDataSource.getConnection(PoolingDataSource.java:106) > > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource.getConnection(BasicDataSource.java:1044) > > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.TestBasicDataSource.getConnection(TestBasicDataSource.java:44) > > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.dbcp.TestAbandonedBasicDataSource.testAbandonedClose(TestAbandonedBasicDataSource.java:75) > > > == %< > > == %< > [junit] org.apache.commons.dbcp.AbandonedTrace$AbandonedObje
Re: DRAFT Board report
Releases from JIRA (from my Commons Dashboard): Commons Pool1.5.420/Nov/09 Commons Email 1.2 12/Nov/09 Commons DbUtils 1.3 12/Nov/09 Commons Exec1.0.1 12/Nov/09 Commons BeanUtils 1.8.2 12/Nov/09 Commons BeanUtils 1.8.1 20/Oct/09 Commons Pool1.5.3 23/Sep/09 Few missing on your list. [A few were missing in JIRA too - I had to go 'release' Exec, Email and Pool 1.5.4 :) ] Makes me want to add a 'releases in last 3 months' flag to the Latest Releases portlet. Also an 'Activity in last 3 months' portlet. Speaking of: JIRA: 188 issues created; 69 of them resolved. JIRA: 67 issues created before the last report are resolved. (For a total of 136 resolved). SVN commits: 1314 dev emails: 1169 user emails: 349 Worthless numbers - I was just interested in how easy it was to find (which was very easy with markmail, svnsearch and a few JIRA filters). Hen On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Sorry for short notice, but I need to get this out tomorrow to hit > board mtg SLA. Quick comments / review appreciated. Last report was > 13-Sept. Thx. -Phil > > > Apache Commons Board Report, December, 2009 > > General > === > > o Continued healthy activity across multiple components and > responsiveness on both dev and user lists. > o New primitives sandbox component started > o Voted to sponsor incubation of agimatec-validation, an > implementation of JSR 303, the bean validation framework. > (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal). > > Releases > > > o Dbutils 1.3 > http://markmail.org/message/3gdxb4bneto7hj7r > o Exec 1.0.1 > http://markmail.org/message/eqvg2sutflizasnf > o Email 1.2 > http://markmail.org/message/fcpz7nlpiv2xa7zg > o Pool 1.5.3 > http://markmail.org/message/7jmcva3kho7ngnv6 > o Pool 1.5.4 > http://markmail.org/message/gmhpz4zsuv2f2jap > > > Community > = > o New Sandbox committers > - Benson Margulies > o No new committers > o No new PMC members > > -Phil Steitz (on behalf of Apache Commons PMC) > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [math] getting changes included into commons-math (was Re: Home for the colt fork)
MATH-312, 314, 316 and 317 were the first round. Some of the necessary changes included: - sparse iterators for sparse vectors - view semantics for sub-matrix and sub-vectors - additional sparse vector types for specialized applications - introduction of an unbounded sparse matrix/vector that simply remembers the highest bound set - introduction of abstract classes to allow off the cuff inner implementations of virtual vectors - introduction of additional decomposition classes - introduction of row and column label abstraction for matrices and vectors - higher performance implementations The 5 issues that Jake filed were mostly address the first point. That stalled out when he hit resistance to change. Since then we have adopted Colt as our matrix/linear algebra/collections implementation and we don't really need any changes to MATH. On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:35 AM, J.Pietschmann wrote: > On 09.12.2009 20:58, Jake Mannix wrote: > >> The commons-math linear APIs have been described as effectively locked >> until 3.0, due to back-compat requirements. >> > > Can you give a short summary of the API changes which are necessary > to incorporate and use the functionality you need? Some functionality > I've seen mentioned here could probably be pressed in the existing > API, but I may have missed some details. > > J.Pietschmann > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve
Re: Commons BeanUtils: RowSetDynaClass.setUseColumnLabel() useless?
Niall Pemberton wrote: Its a bug, can you create a bug report please: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-371 created - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r889641 - in /commons/proper/jexl/trunk: src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl2/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl2/introspection/ src/site/ src/test/java/org/apache/commons/jexl
OK, thanks! On 12/12/2009, henrib wrote: > > Fixed, sorry (switch to NB 6.8). > > > sebb-2-2 wrote: > > > > Please don't add copyright to the AL header ... > > > ... > > > Same applies to ClassCreator, ClassCreatorTest, PublicFieldsTest in > > src/test/java/org/apache/commons/jexl2 > > > ... > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r889641-in-commons-proper-jexl-trunk-src-main-java-org-apache-commons-jexl2-src-main-j-tp961316p961826.html > Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: DRAFT Board report
+1 On 12/12/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: > Sorry for short notice, but I need to get this out tomorrow to hit > board mtg SLA. Quick comments / review appreciated. Last report was > 13-Sept. Thx. -Phil > > > Apache Commons Board Report, December, 2009 > > General > === > > o Continued healthy activity across multiple components and > responsiveness on both dev and user lists. > o New primitives sandbox component started > o Voted to sponsor incubation of agimatec-validation, an > implementation of JSR 303, the bean validation framework. > (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal). > > Releases > > > o Dbutils 1.3 > http://markmail.org/message/3gdxb4bneto7hj7r > o Exec 1.0.1 > http://markmail.org/message/eqvg2sutflizasnf > o Email 1.2 > http://markmail.org/message/fcpz7nlpiv2xa7zg > o Pool 1.5.3 > http://markmail.org/message/7jmcva3kho7ngnv6 > o Pool 1.5.4 > http://markmail.org/message/gmhpz4zsuv2f2jap > > > Community > = > o New Sandbox committers > - Benson Margulies > o No new committers > o No new PMC members > > -Phil Steitz (on behalf of Apache Commons PMC) > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r889641 - in /commons/proper/jexl/trunk: src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl2/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl2/introspection/ src/site/ src/test/java/org/apache/commons/jexl
Fixed, sorry (switch to NB 6.8). sebb-2-2 wrote: > > Please don't add copyright to the AL header ... > ... > Same applies to ClassCreator, ClassCreatorTest, PublicFieldsTest in > src/test/java/org/apache/commons/jexl2 > ... > -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r889641-in-commons-proper-jexl-trunk-src-main-java-org-apache-commons-jexl2-src-main-j-tp961316p961826.html Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [math] getting changes included into commons-math (was Re: Home for the colt fork)
On 09.12.2009 20:58, Jake Mannix wrote: The commons-math linear APIs have been described as effectively locked until 3.0, due to back-compat requirements. Can you give a short summary of the API changes which are necessary to incorporate and use the functionality you need? Some functionality I've seen mentioned here could probably be pressed in the existing API, but I may have missed some details. J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
DRAFT Board report
Sorry for short notice, but I need to get this out tomorrow to hit board mtg SLA. Quick comments / review appreciated. Last report was 13-Sept. Thx. -Phil Apache Commons Board Report, December, 2009 General === o Continued healthy activity across multiple components and responsiveness on both dev and user lists. o New primitives sandbox component started o Voted to sponsor incubation of agimatec-validation, an implementation of JSR 303, the bean validation framework. (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal). Releases o Dbutils 1.3 http://markmail.org/message/3gdxb4bneto7hj7r o Exec 1.0.1 http://markmail.org/message/eqvg2sutflizasnf o Email 1.2 http://markmail.org/message/fcpz7nlpiv2xa7zg o Pool 1.5.3 http://markmail.org/message/7jmcva3kho7ngnv6 o Pool 1.5.4 http://markmail.org/message/gmhpz4zsuv2f2jap Community = o New Sandbox committers - Benson Margulies o No new committers o No new PMC members -Phil Steitz (on behalf of Apache Commons PMC) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] 3.0 status
On 12/12/2009, Henri Yandell wrote: > Updating status again. > > * 103 resolved issues out of 161. From Sep 6 we resolved 38 issues and > had 30 new ones. > * 78 contributors involved in the resolved issues, 80 patches and 511 > comments. > * I believe we now have 3 issues that would benefit from JDK 1.6. Sun > have "end of life"d Java 1.5, though presumably there are other > vendors who haven't. Personally I still lean towards becoming 1.6 > dependent. Which are these? Could LANG still be built to be 1.5 compatible, apart from the code that uses the 1.6 features? Seems to me that going from a minimum of Java 1.2 for 2.x to Java 1.6 for lang 3.x is a huge leap. > * Still lots to work on. Here's a short list of very approachable > issues (be they simple or tricky): > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-288 - bit of original code > to do. Fairly involved. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-521 - support "2." in NumberUtils. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-426 - possible new feature > for StrTokenizer. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-405 - needs unit test/bugfixing > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-403 - fun bit of code > > Collections continues to look inactive and I've got my eye on a few > pieces there for 'rescuing' into Lang. I especially think the > Comparator bits would be a better fit in Lang. (LANG-532). > > Major changes since Sep: > > * Package name changed to lang3 > * Maven groupId changed (org.apache.commons) > * Reverting of EqualsBuilder to not treat BigDecimal specially > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310481&updated%3Aafter=6%2FSep%2F09&status=5&status=6&sorter/field=updated&sorter/order=DESC > > Notable on-going work: > > * Validate being overhauled > * New concurrent package being developed > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310481&fixfor=12311714&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC > > Hen > > > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Thought I'd share the status of Lang 3.0. > > > > * 65 resolved issues out of 131. Basically around 50% of the way there. > > * 65 contributors involved, with 55 patches and 340 comments. Thanks > > to everyone out there for the work so far. > > * First commit on 25 Mar 2008, so about 18 months along now. That was > > one week after the last release (2.4). > > > > Ideally... March 2010 would be a great time to see 3.0 come out. :) > > > > I've started moving some issues to 3.x that don't have anything > > actionable. Things like "Maybe add a RegexUtils?" etc. Basically > > ideas. > > > > There's one JDK 1.6 dependent issue in there. WIth a circa March 2010 > > release, I think that's a fine dependency given that 1.5 goes end of > > life in Nov 2008. > > > > There are a good range of simple and complex issues in there to work on. > > > > Hen > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] 3.0 status
Updating status again. * 103 resolved issues out of 161. From Sep 6 we resolved 38 issues and had 30 new ones. * 78 contributors involved in the resolved issues, 80 patches and 511 comments. * I believe we now have 3 issues that would benefit from JDK 1.6. Sun have "end of life"d Java 1.5, though presumably there are other vendors who haven't. Personally I still lean towards becoming 1.6 dependent. * Still lots to work on. Here's a short list of very approachable issues (be they simple or tricky): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-288 - bit of original code to do. Fairly involved. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-521 - support "2." in NumberUtils. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-426 - possible new feature for StrTokenizer. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-405 - needs unit test/bugfixing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-403 - fun bit of code Collections continues to look inactive and I've got my eye on a few pieces there for 'rescuing' into Lang. I especially think the Comparator bits would be a better fit in Lang. (LANG-532). Major changes since Sep: * Package name changed to lang3 * Maven groupId changed (org.apache.commons) * Reverting of EqualsBuilder to not treat BigDecimal specially https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310481&updated%3Aafter=6%2FSep%2F09&status=5&status=6&sorter/field=updated&sorter/order=DESC Notable on-going work: * Validate being overhauled * New concurrent package being developed https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310481&fixfor=12311714&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC Hen On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Thought I'd share the status of Lang 3.0. > > * 65 resolved issues out of 131. Basically around 50% of the way there. > * 65 contributors involved, with 55 patches and 340 comments. Thanks > to everyone out there for the work so far. > * First commit on 25 Mar 2008, so about 18 months along now. That was > one week after the last release (2.4). > > Ideally... March 2010 would be a great time to see 3.0 come out. :) > > I've started moving some issues to 3.x that don't have anything > actionable. Things like "Maybe add a RegexUtils?" etc. Basically > ideas. > > There's one JDK 1.6 dependent issue in there. WIth a circa March 2010 > release, I think that's a fine dependency given that 1.5 goes end of > life in Nov 2008. > > There are a good range of simple and complex issues in there to work on. > > Hen > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org