Re: GSoC 2015 - very little interest so far

2015-02-13 Thread Richard Downer
Ah, disregard my email, I see that you answered later in the thread!

Thanks
Richard.

On 13 February 2015 at 09:33, Richard Downer rich...@apache.org wrote:
 Uli,

 Can incubator podlings participate? As a we don't have a PMC (instead,
 a PPMC) we didn't receive your mail but I think this could be a good
 opportunity for our project.

 Cheers,
 Richard.

 On 11 February 2015 at 22:18, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote:
 Hi Pierre,

 the original email went bcc p...@apache.org so all PMCs should be aware of 
 the programme.

 Great to hear that there is interest within Directory and OpenMeetings. 
 There are however no ideas
 on our list from those two projects. It would be great if you could remind 
 them to record them.

 Cheers,

 Uli

 On 2015-02-11 12:06, Pierre Smits wrote:
 Hi Ulrich,

 Don't know whether your call for action was also sent to PMC Members of the
 projects (via private@), but there is interest in Apache Directory and
 Apache OpenMeetings.

 For Apache Directory interest, have a look at:
 http://directory.markmail.org/message/fgvejt7gncwheyki
 For Apache OpenMeetings interest, have a look at:
 http://markmail.org/message/e23ishui3rt7hhsg

 Best regards,

 Pierre Smits

 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com

 On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote:

 Hi Folks,

 Our ideas list for GSoC projects [1] so far has only 38 entries. IMO this
 number is extremely low
 given the number of projects at Apache. I conclude that interest in GSoC
 this year is either very
 low or that my initial email has not reached the right people.

 Please help me spread the word by reminding your projects' communities of
 GSoC and the great
 opportunity for community building it provides.

 Thanks,

 Uli


 [1] http://s.apache.org/gsoc2015ideas




Re: Fast Feather Track - anyone want to take charge for Austin?

2015-02-13 Thread jan i
On 12 February 2015 at 23:23, Nick Burch n...@apache.org wrote:

 Hi All

 Hopefully most of you will know about the Fast Feather Track? For those
 who don't, it's often described as:

  a series of short talks, 10-20 minutes in length, covering things that
 are new / interesting / exciting / incubating / recently changed / etc.
 It's a great chance to learn about what's hot, what's new, and what's
 coming soon! Whether that's a new project entering the incubator, something
 shortly to graduate, or an amazing new area of technology that'll change
 everything when it's done, the Fast Feather Track is the place for it!


 It tends to be a mixture of people having their first chance of speaking
 at ApacheCon, and old-hands talking about the fun new thing that has got
 them all excited once more. As such, it's an important source of practice
 for new speakers (many of whom go on to give great full talks the session
 after), and a chance for more experience ASFers in the audience to learn
 about interesting new things in a friendly small space.

 (There have also been bigger FFT sessions during lunches, where more
 experienced speakers spoke to a bigger audience about fun/new/interesting
 stuff, which has worked well as and when the lunch setup permits it)


 A few years ago, I made the mistake of asking the then ApacheCon
 conference committee what was happening with the Fast Feather track that
 event, and somehow landed up running it then, and for some time to come...

 However, I worry that I might've been organising it too long, and so I'd
 like to offer it up in case someone else fancies taking over running it for
 Austin?

no way you do a good job, you have the experience. It is not so easy to
loose something you do well.




 Organisational wise, it isn't too much work. You need to write a little
 bit about what you want in the track and who should submit (plenty of
 examples on the wiki! Just search within http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon
 ).
 Then you just setup a form / google doc / etc to collect session
 proposals, put out the word to potential speakers (pmcs@, general@i.a.o,
 twitter etc), notify whoever you want to have, tell the LF what space you
 need, turn up and learn lots of new fun things! :)


 So, anyone fancy trying their hand at conference organising with a nice
 small, easily manageable, fun mini-track thing? Fast Feather needs you!

Well if you really want to give it up, I could offer to be point on FFT;
provided you promise to help behind the scenes (e.g. convincing the grey
beards to participate).

It of course need to be coordinated with my TAC work on site, but that
should be possible.

rgds
jan i.



 Nick



Re: [APACHECON] Proposed Science and Healthcare Track

2015-02-13 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
Cheers Suresh!

++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++






-Original Message-
From: Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 11:43 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: [APACHECON] Proposed Science and Healthcare Track

Thanks Lewis for volunteering to be the science track chair and pulling
together the talks. It looks great.

Suresh

 On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Rich and Folks,
 
 Here is version 2 which is more comprehensive.
 Again, one of my own presentations is in here I want to make that clear
to
 people.
 Thank you
 
 Day 1 - Science
 Getting Started with Apache OODT, Tom Barber
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4150
 
 Applying Apache Hadoop to NASA’s Big Climate Data, Glenn Tamkin
 
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4145
 
 
 Apache Tika: Cool insights into Polar Data, Annie Burgess
 
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4131
 
 
 Streaming-OODT: Combining Apache Spark's Power with Apache OODT, Michael
 Starch
 
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4100
 
 
 Exploring Apache Tika's Translate API to Enable Linguistic Analysis of
 Scientific Metadata through Internationalizing NASA JPL’s Physical
 Oceanographic Data Active Archive Centre, Lewis John McGibbney
 
 
 Content extraction from images and video in Tika, Chris Mattmann
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4244
 
 Day 2 - Science and Healthcare
 * Apache Airavata overview and roadmap, Suresh Marru
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4287
 
 Programming Math in Java - Lessons from Apache Commons Math, Phil Steitz
 
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4231
 
 
 Userfriendly workflows with Apache OODT, Tom Barber
 
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4149
 
 
 Pharmacovigilance - Big Data for RealTime Drug Monitoring, Pei Chen
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4081
 
 Redefining ETL pipelines with Apache technologies to accelerate
 decision-making and execution for clinical trials, Eran Withana
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4195
 
 Linked Biomedical Dataspace: Extending Apache Jena to Federate Large
Scale
 Open Data Repositories, Claude N. Warren, Jr.
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/3994
 
 Day 3 - Science
 
 Development of IBM Watson with UIMA DUCC, Eddie Epstein
 
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4199
 
 
 IPython Notebook and Apache Spark as a Unified Data Science Interface
for
 Hadoop, Casey Stella
 
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4155
 
 
 Apache UIMA BoFs, Marshall Schor
 
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4197
 
 
 The Emergence of the Datacenter Developer, Kiersten Gaffney
 
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4185
 
 
 Filtering Twitter with UIMA, Daniel Gruhl
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4166
 
 Internet of Things, Justin McLean
 
 http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/proposals/4191




Re: GSoC 2015 - very little interest so far

2015-02-13 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
My bad Uli. I will add a bunch of OODT, Tika, and Nutch
GSoC issues. We will engage sorry Uli. Will try and
add some to the tracker this weekend.

++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++






-Original Message-
From: Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 2:20 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: GSoC 2015 - very little interest so far

Hi Alex,

My email went to private@incubator with the explicit request to forward
it to podlings. I'll re-send
it to the general list hoping that it doesn't drown in the flood of
emails there.

Cheers,

Uli

On 2015-02-11 12:12, Alex B. wrote:
 There also might be a lot of issues submitted in the last minute
before
 the deadline, as it happens with talk for ApacheCon CFP,
 I.e by new projects from the Incubator who are interested but are just
 starting they ASF journey and did not have much time to prepare
beforehand
 this year (like Zeppelin http://markmail.org/message/kcidofpyr36eb5br)
 
 Might it be worth\appropriate posting a short notice on Incubator list
too?
 
 --
 Kind regards,
 Alex
 
 On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 Hi Ulrich,

 Don't know whether your call for action was also sent to PMC Members
of the
 projects (via private@), but there is interest in Apache Directory and
 Apache OpenMeetings.

 For Apache Directory interest, have a look at:
 http://directory.markmail.org/message/fgvejt7gncwheyki
 For Apache OpenMeetings interest, have a look at:
 http://markmail.org/message/e23ishui3rt7hhsg

 Best regards,

 Pierre Smits

 *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
 Services  Solutions for Cloud-
 Based Manufacturing, Professional
 Services and Retail  Trade
 http://www.orrtiz.com

 On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de
wrote:

 Hi Folks,

 Our ideas list for GSoC projects [1] so far has only 38 entries. IMO
this
 number is extremely low
 given the number of projects at Apache. I conclude that interest in
GSoC
 this year is either very
 low or that my initial email has not reached the right people.

 Please help me spread the word by reminding your projects'
communities of
 GSoC and the great
 opportunity for community building it provides.

 Thanks,

 Uli


 [1] http://s.apache.org/gsoc2015ideas


 



Re: A maturity model for Apache projects

2015-02-13 Thread Shane Curcuru
On 1/9/15 9:23 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
 
 
 On 01/07/2015 04:43 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
 I think we also need to discuss whether we expect projects to
 undertake self-evaluation and reflection, or whether we'd have a
 process of review involving peers, mentors, shepherds etc.
 
 No, I absolutely don't want to create another stack of overhead, or Yet
 Another hoop to jump through, as you said.
 
 I think directed self-evaluation is the way I'd want to go - one or
 two persons from ComDev, in conjunction with two or three persons from
 the PMC, doing an evaluation. I imagine this as a function of ComDev,
 not of the board. That is, it's a community/project strengthening
 exercise, not a Big Hammer.
 
Indeed, this whole process is merely coming up with a well-thought out
document that we hope helps people who are interested in it.  As I see
this, it's not any explicit process burden for podlings or TLPs (or
pTLPs, if we ever have them).

The board and project reporting schedules, and the list of minimal
project requirements are what Apache projects do have to follow/do/be.

  https://www.apache.org/dev/project-requirements.html

As always, it will be good to put some concise yet clear explanations
and links between the different documents.

- Shane