On 1/9/15 9:23 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 01/07/2015 04:43 AM, Scott Wilson wrote: >> I think we also need to discuss whether we expect projects to >> undertake self-evaluation and reflection, or whether we'd have a >> process of review involving peers, mentors, shepherds etc. > > No, I absolutely don't want to create another stack of overhead, or Yet > Another hoop to jump through, as you said. > > I think "directed self-evaluation" is the way I'd want to go - one or > two persons from ComDev, in conjunction with two or three persons from > the PMC, doing an evaluation. I imagine this as a function of ComDev, > not of the board. That is, it's a community/project strengthening > exercise, not a Big Hammer. > Indeed, this whole process is merely coming up with a well-thought out document that we hope helps people who are interested in it. As I see this, it's not any explicit process burden for podlings or TLPs (or pTLPs, if we ever have them).
The board and project reporting schedules, and the list of minimal project requirements are what Apache projects do have to follow/do/be. https://www.apache.org/dev/project-requirements.html As always, it will be good to put some concise yet clear explanations and links between the different documents. - Shane
