Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Chris, This is an excellent idea. Currently the entire suite of browser tests are also run from the command line, where we overload the CouchDB definition and use couchjs. We could break the suite out with a subset staying in share/www/script/test to be used as you suggest, and the lion's share of them moving to test/javascript to be run as part of make check. They serve a great role in testing end-end but go a little too far in making use of the browser. I'll take a closer look at this over the weekend. Best, Bob On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Chris Anderson wrote: I agree, the browser tests should move to the command line, and a small subset (30 seconds tops) of tests should be in the browser (useful for debugging proxy config, installation, spidermonkey version, or whatever. I'd rather not block 1.1 on rewriting the test suite, even though I agree the browser suite has started to outgrow itself. I am happy to report that all tests pass on my machine (basically stock macbook air). +1 from me. Thanks to everyone who helped with 1.1. Chris On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now. I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to 4 is also most of the issue. Could be. :) DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) -- Chris Anderson http://jchrisa.net http://couchbase.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 3 Jun 2011, at 11:09, Robert Dionne wrote: Chris, This is an excellent idea. Currently the entire suite of browser tests are also run from the command line, where we overload the CouchDB definition and use couchjs. We could break the suite out with a subset staying in share/www/script/test to be used as you suggest, and the lion's share of them moving to test/javascript to be run as part of make check. They serve a great role in testing end-end but go a little too far in making use of the browser. I'll take a closer look at this over the weekend. Related: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201010.mbox/%3c4897047e-3c28-4ff4-900f-ff564bbc3...@apache.org%3e I still intend to commit this once 1.1.0 is out :) Cheers Jan -- Best, Bob On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Chris Anderson wrote: I agree, the browser tests should move to the command line, and a small subset (30 seconds tops) of tests should be in the browser (useful for debugging proxy config, installation, spidermonkey version, or whatever. I'd rather not block 1.1 on rewriting the test suite, even though I agree the browser suite has started to outgrow itself. I am happy to report that all tests pass on my machine (basically stock macbook air). +1 from me. Thanks to everyone who helped with 1.1. Chris On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now. I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to 4 is also most of the issue. Could be. :) DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) -- Chris Anderson http://jchrisa.net http://couchbase.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Top posting to Bob's top posting, same for me. FF 4.0.1 has been fine on R14B01 / 03 also, when I remember to clear cache. Chrome also seems to be fine I've had no issues with safari current mac version either but not tested either systematically. @nslater when it hangs is there anything of note happening in the erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone! A+ Dave insert smiley of choice here On 2 June 2011 09:40, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com wrote: I'll note that I exclusively use firefox 4.0.1 and the test suite passes reliably in it of R14B01/02/03 (now that the replication bug is fixed). B. On 1 June 2011 21:55, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: Just tangentially FYI: From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by success or failure per browser and version: http://friendpaste.com/6GBZiLCVRF3t4JcLFqLKQ9 Cheers Jan -- On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:48, Noah Slater wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote: FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old versions of the test scripts cached. I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Hi Peter, thanks for cheering from the sidelines, you vote is most welcome :) Here's a link that should get you up to speed with the procedure and tell you what is expected or not: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html Let us know if you have any questions :) Cheers Jan -- On 2 Jun 2011, at 04:26, Peter Nolan wrote: well, i view myself as neither an active player nor a sidelined player but an eager first row fan in this community that looks forward to the advances in this couch 'game'. With minimal understanding of what would/wouldn't make a good release, my vote should have marginal weight. To quote, the streets lets push things forward. +0
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
mostly for fun, I did more testing than our standard procedure to even begin each round of this releasel +1 Mac OS X 10.6.7, erlang R14B03, firefox 4.0.1 digests and sigs verified. make check and Futon all clear (have to clear cache, though). As part of preparing for round 3 I ran all the above tests (and more) on R14B01 and R14B02 as well. B. On 2 June 2011 09:50, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: Hi Peter, thanks for cheering from the sidelines, you vote is most welcome :) Here's a link that should get you up to speed with the procedure and tell you what is expected or not: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html Let us know if you have any questions :) Cheers Jan -- On 2 Jun 2011, at 04:26, Peter Nolan wrote: well, i view myself as neither an active player nor a sidelined player but an eager first row fan in this community that looks forward to the advances in this couch 'game'. With minimal understanding of what would/wouldn't make a good release, my vote should have marginal weight. To quote, the streets lets push things forward. +0
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 2 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: @nslater when it hangs is there anything of note happening in the erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone! Nope, nothing.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: On 2 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: @nslater when it hangs is there anything of note happening in the erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone! Nope, nothing. If Chrome passed fine I'm guessing the error is in the browser.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 2 Jun 2011, at 14:38, Jan Lehnardt wrote: I've seen this in the past occasionally, where the test suite does a _restart and then waits forever for CouchDB to come back. The Erlang console will show the regular startup procedure output, but then it just waits there for requests. I have verified that it actually *does* accept requests when it is in this state. Maybe it is the wait for restart routine that has a bug or triggers one inside Firefox. Oh yes, restarting Firefox and running new tests works. CouchDB is sat there, happily waiting to requests. The problem is with the test code.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away. Unit tests fail for me. - replicator_db error 3001ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} rev_stemming error 7ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} rewrite error 10ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} security_validation error 6ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} show_documents error 11ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} stats error 7ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} update_documents error 5ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} users_db error 4ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} - Tried to re-run these tests in with debug on, but Firefox locked up. The tests lock up on me all the time. And I don't mean, while they're running through, as expected. When they fail, or I try to restart one, basically, the whole thing just freezes. I never seem to be able to do much more, other than restart Firefox. I'm not sure why this happens, but I really wish it wouldn't. Makes testing harder than it could be. - After restarting Firefox all these tests pass. Very weird. Going to run the whole test suite again. — auth_cache fails assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed assertion hits_after == hits_before failed cookie_auth fails error: file_exists The test suite then hung on replicator_db again. Killing Firefox and trying again. — auth_cache fails assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed assertion hits_after == hits_before failed The test suite then hung on replicator_db again. Killing Firefox and trying again, manually. Note I was not able to get debug output because the test suite hangs Firefox. I don't see anything happening in the CouchDB log either. So my best guess is that Firefox is just looping over something mindlessly. — Running auth_cache manually lots of times produces no errors. Running through all the tests manually from the start. cookie_auth fails again for the same reason. Ran with debug: Exception raised: {message:ddoc is null,fileName:http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js,lineNumber:41,stack:;()@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js:41\u000arun_on_modified_server([object Array],(function () {try {var usersDb = new CouchDB(\test_suite_users\, {'X-Couch-Full-Commit': \false\});usersDb.deleteDb();usersDb.createDb();var ddoc = usersDb.open(\_design/_auth\);T(ddoc.validate_doc_update);var password = \3.141592653589\;var jasonUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \Jason Davies\, roles: [\dev\]}, password);T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);var checkDoc = usersDb.open(jasonUserDoc._id);T(checkDoc.name == \Jason Davies\);var jchrisUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \jch...@apache.org\}, \funnybone\);T(usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc).ok);var duplicateJchrisDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \jch...@apache.org\}, \eh, Boo-Boo?\);try {usersDb.save(duplicateJchrisDoc);T(false \Can't create duplicate user names. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error == \conflict\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 409);}var underscoreUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \_why\}, \copperfield\);try {usersDb.save(underscoreUserDoc);T(false \Can't create underscore user names. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error == \forbidden\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}var badIdDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \foo\}, \bar\);badIdDoc._id = \org.apache.couchdb:w00x\;try {usersDb.save(badIdDoc);T(false \Can't create malformed docids. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error == \forbidden\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(CouchDB.login(\Jason Davies\, password).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \Jason Davies\);var xhr = CouchDB.request(\POST\, \/_session\, {headers: {'Content-Type': \application/json\}, body: JSON.stringify({name: \Jason Davies\, password: password})});T(JSON.parse(xhr.responseText).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \Jason Davies\);jasonUserDoc.foo = 2;T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\_admin\) == -1);try {usersDb.deleteDoc(jchrisUserDoc);T(false \Can't delete other users docs. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error == \forbidden\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(!CouchDB.login(\Jason Davies\, \2.71828\).ok);T(!CouchDB.login(\Robert Allen Zimmerman\, \d00d\).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name != \Jason Davies\);xhr = CouchDB.request(\POST\, \/_session?next=/\, {headers: {'Content-Type': \application/x-www-form-urlencoded\}, body: \name=Jason%20Daviespassword=\ + encodeURIComponent(password)});if (xhr.status == 200) {T(/Welcome/.test(xhr.responseText));} else {T(xhr.status == 302);T(xhr.getResponseHeader(\Location\));}T(CouchDB.login(\jch...@apache.org\, \funnybone\).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \jch...@apache.org\);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.length ==
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Noah, Does make check run with all the etaps passing? Bob On Jun 1, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Noah Slater wrote: Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away. Unit tests fail for me. - replicator_db error 3001ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} rev_stemming error 7ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} rewrite error 10ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} security_validation error 6ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} show_documents error 11ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} stats error 7ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} update_documents error 5ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} users_db error 4ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} - Tried to re-run these tests in with debug on, but Firefox locked up. The tests lock up on me all the time. And I don't mean, while they're running through, as expected. When they fail, or I try to restart one, basically, the whole thing just freezes. I never seem to be able to do much more, other than restart Firefox. I'm not sure why this happens, but I really wish it wouldn't. Makes testing harder than it could be. - After restarting Firefox all these tests pass. Very weird. Going to run the whole test suite again. — auth_cache fails assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed assertion hits_after == hits_before failed cookie_auth fails error: file_exists The test suite then hung on replicator_db again. Killing Firefox and trying again. — auth_cache fails assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed assertion hits_after == hits_before failed The test suite then hung on replicator_db again. Killing Firefox and trying again, manually. Note I was not able to get debug output because the test suite hangs Firefox. I don't see anything happening in the CouchDB log either. So my best guess is that Firefox is just looping over something mindlessly. — Running auth_cache manually lots of times produces no errors. Running through all the tests manually from the start. cookie_auth fails again for the same reason. Ran with debug: Exception raised: {message:ddoc is null,fileName:http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js,lineNumber:41,stack:;()@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js:41\u000arun_on_modified_server([object Array],(function () {try {var usersDb = new CouchDB(\test_suite_users\, {'X-Couch-Full-Commit': \false\});usersDb.deleteDb();usersDb.createDb();var ddoc = usersDb.open(\_design/_auth\);T(ddoc.validate_doc_update);var password = \3.141592653589\;var jasonUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \Jason Davies\, roles: [\dev\]}, password);T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);var checkDoc = usersDb.open(jasonUserDoc._id);T(checkDoc.name == \Jason Davies\);var jchrisUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \jch...@apache.org\}, \funnybone\);T(usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc).ok);var duplicateJchrisDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \jch...@apache.org\}, \eh, Boo-Boo?\);try {usersDb.save(duplicateJchrisDoc);T(false \Can't create duplicate user names. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error == \conflict\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 409);}var underscoreUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \_why\}, \copperfield\);try {usersDb.save(underscoreUserDoc);T(false \Can't create underscore user names. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error == \forbidden\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}var badIdDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \foo\}, \bar\);badIdDoc._id = \org.apache.couchdb:w00x\;try {usersDb.save(badIdDoc);T(false \Can't create malformed docids. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error == \forbidden\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(CouchDB.login(\Jason Davies\, password).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \Jason Davies\);var xhr = CouchDB.request(\POST\, \/_session\, {headers: {'Content-Type': \application/json\}, body: JSON.stringify({name: \Jason Davies\, password: password})});T(JSON.parse(xhr.responseText).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \Jason Davies\);jasonUserDoc.foo = 2;T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\_admin\) == -1);try {usersDb.deleteDoc(jchrisUserDoc);T(false \Can't delete other users docs. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error == \forbidden\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(!CouchDB.login(\Jason Davies\, \2.71828\).ok);T(!CouchDB.login(\Robert Allen Zimmerman\, \d00d\).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name != \Jason Davies\);xhr = CouchDB.request(\POST\, \/_session?next=/\, {headers: {'Content-Type': \application/x-www-form-urlencoded\}, body: \name=Jason%20Daviespassword=\ + encodeURIComponent(password)});if (xhr.status == 200)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away. Unit tests fail for me. - replicator_db error 3001ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} rev_stemming error 7ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} rewrite error 10ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} security_validation error 6ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} show_documents error 11ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} stats error 7ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} update_documents error 5ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} users_db error 4ms Run with debugger • Exception raised: {} This usually indicates that something broked on the server. I've only seen it in corner cases where I segfault in a NIF or similar. Did you check if couch was still running? auth_cache fails assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed assertion hits_after == hits_before failed This is related to browser cache. Command-Shift-R and the cache sweep button usually fixes it. cookie_auth fails error: file_exists Didn't we just fix this? Gonna give this -1 until we fix the unit tests. I wonder whether anyone else runs the unit tests at all, sometimes! ;) I ran them on Chrome and they passed just fine. Perhaps its a FF issue that no-one has noticed yet. Also, you don't have Firebug turned on do you? That can screw with things.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 19:21, Paul Davis wrote: This usually indicates that something broked on the server. I've only seen it in corner cases where I segfault in a NIF or similar. Did you check if couch was still running? Couch was running, and the tests afterwards all passed. auth_cache fails assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed assertion hits_after == hits_before failed This is related to browser cache. Command-Shift-R and the cache sweep button usually fixes it. Should the tests work around this? cookie_auth fails error: file_exists Didn't we just fix this? Evidently not. ;) Gonna give this -1 until we fix the unit tests. I wonder whether anyone else runs the unit tests at all, sometimes! ;) I ran them on Chrome and they passed just fine. Perhaps its a FF issue that no-one has noticed yet. Also, you don't have Firebug turned on do you? That can screw with things. I don't even have it installed! Just ran the tests in Chrome and they all pass. What gives?
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now. I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now. I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to 4 is also most of the issue. Could be. :) DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now. I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to 4 is also most of the issue. Could be. :) DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its excellent HTTP support.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now. I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to 4 is also most of the issue. Could be. :) DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its excellent HTTP support. insertwittyreply (I've got nothing) --
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old versions of the test scripts cached. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now. I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to 4 is also most of the issue. Could be. :) DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its excellent HTTP support. insertwittyreply (I've got nothing) --
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
What version of FF? 3.5 or newer? On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old versions of the test scripts cached. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now. I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to 4 is also most of the issue. Could be. :) DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its excellent HTTP support. insertwittyreply (I've got nothing) --
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote: Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 Please follow our test procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure Happy voting, B. I'm +1 on releasing these artifacts, but I would like to note that, contrary to the INSTALL.Unix instructions, CouchDB 1.1 will not work on Erlang/OTP R12B05. We should update the docs in a future patch release. Cheers, Adam
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:29, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote: What version of FF? 3.5 or newer? 4.0.1 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old versions of the test scripts cached. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now. I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome. Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it. Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to 4 is also most of the issue. Could be. :) DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY! (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.) I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its excellent HTTP support. insertwittyreply (I've got nothing) --
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote: FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old versions of the test scripts cached. I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Just tangentially FYI: From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by success or failure per browser and version: http://friendpaste.com/6GBZiLCVRF3t4JcLFqLKQ9 Cheers Jan -- On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:48, Noah Slater wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote: FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old versions of the test scripts cached. I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
I'll note that I exclusively use firefox 4.0.1 and the test suite passes reliably in it of R14B01/02/03 (now that the replication bug is fixed). B. On 1 June 2011 21:55, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: Just tangentially FYI: From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by success or failure per browser and version: http://friendpaste.com/6GBZiLCVRF3t4JcLFqLKQ9 Cheers Jan -- On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:48, Noah Slater wrote: On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote: FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox. Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old versions of the test scripts cached. I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
/me votes 'present'.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
well, i view myself as neither an active player nor a sidelined player but an eager first row fan in this community that looks forward to the advances in this couch 'game'. With minimal understanding of what would/wouldn't make a good release, my vote should have marginal weight. To quote, the streets lets push things forward. +0
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
+1 OS X 10.6 Erlang 14B01 All tests pass On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote: Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 Please follow our test procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure Happy voting, B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Verified, +1 On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Robert Dionne dio...@dionne-associates.com wrote: +1 OS X 10.6 Erlang 14B01 All tests pass On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote: Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 Please follow our test procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure Happy voting, B. -- Filipe David Manana, fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 31 May 2011 20:55, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: Hi Robert, I want to second the others' gratitude for your help pushing 1.1.0 out. What Jan said! This release has been a real saga and you are awesome!! A+ Dave
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 15:23, Dave Cottlehuber d...@muse.net.nz wrote: What Jan said! This release has been a real saga and you are awesome!! +1. (I've tried the release and make check passes for me. I don't think any of the browsers I run are supported for the Futon tests, so I'm skipping those -- but most look good, anyway.) Cheesr, Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Howdy, The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work! Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3: - SHA passes - `make check` passes all tests - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps hanging the browser with unresponsive script dialogs). - Root URL signature is correct Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1095523). We need to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases. -1 Cheers, -- Sam Bisbee www.sbisbee.com On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 Please follow our test procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure Happy voting, B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote: Howdy, The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work! Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3: - SHA passes - `make check` passes all tests - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps hanging the browser with unresponsive script dialogs). - Root URL signature is correct Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1095523). We need to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases. The required mentions are in the commit you reference: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE?r1=1095523r2=1095522pathrev=1095523 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/LICENSE?r1=1095523r2=1095522pathrev=1095523 Cheers Jan -- -1 Cheers, -- Sam Bisbee www.sbisbee.com On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 Please follow our test procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure Happy voting, B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote: Howdy, The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work! Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3: - SHA passes - `make check` passes all tests - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps hanging the browser with unresponsive script dialogs). - Root URL signature is correct Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1095523). We need to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases. The required mentions are in the commit you reference: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE?r1=1095523r2=1095522pathrev=1095523 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/LICENSE?r1=1095523r2=1095522pathrev=1095523 Cheers Jan I am surprised that it does not need to be in CHANGES, but since that is the case and everything else looks so awesome, I am +1 now on the release. Cheers, -- Sam Bisbee www.sbisbee.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 31 May 2011, at 17:51, Sam Bisbee wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote: Howdy, The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work! Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3: - SHA passes - `make check` passes all tests - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps hanging the browser with unresponsive script dialogs). - Root URL signature is correct Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1095523). We need to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases. The required mentions are in the commit you reference: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE?r1=1095523r2=1095522pathrev=1095523 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/LICENSE?r1=1095523r2=1095522pathrev=1095523 Cheers Jan I am surprised that it does not need to be in CHANGES, but since that is the case and everything else looks so awesome, I am +1 now on the release. I agree it'd be nice to have this in CHANGES, but AFAIK this is not required. I would not consider this a showstopper though, so thanks for changing your vote :) Cheers Jan --
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
OS X 10.6.7, Erlang R14B03 +1 * signatures: ok * make check: ok * browser test suite: Firefox 4.0.1 Safari 5.0.5: ok Great work! On 31.05.2011, at 00:25, Robert Newson wrote: Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 Please follow our test procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure Happy voting, B.
[VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 Please follow our test procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure Happy voting, B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
* Signature OK * MD5 OK * SHA1 OK * Make check OK * Futon OK +1 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:25, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 Please follow our test procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure Happy voting, B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
+1 here. Motions pass on latest OS X. On May 30, 2011, at 8:09 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote: * Signature OK * MD5 OK * SHA1 OK * Make check OK * Futon OK +1 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:25, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 Please follow our test procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure Happy voting, B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 Please follow our test procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure Happy voting, B. Ubuntu (10.04): All tests successful. Files=41, Tests=735, 73 wallclock secs ( 0.44 usr 0.11 sys + 18.82 cusr 2.52 csys = 21.89 CPU) Result: PASS FreeBSD: All tests successful. Files=41, Tests=735, 85 wallclock secs (20.09 cusr + 3.78 csys = 23.87 CPU) +1 @Robert: Thanks very, very much for pulling through on this release! This is really, really appreciated! Till
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
On 31 May 2011 10:25, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3. Two further issues have been resolved since round 2; 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03. 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin). We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! We are voting on the following release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/ These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0 Please follow our test procedure: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure Happy voting, B. +1 - md5 ok - sha1 ok Mac OS X 10.6.7 + erlang R14B01 - make check ok - futon ok (via ff 4.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7) Mac OS X 10.6.7 + erlang R14B03 - make check ok - futon ok (via ff 4.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7) Windows 7 Enterprise + erlang R14B01 - make check n/a as usual (note to self to fix this) - futon ok (via ff 4.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7) woo!!! A+ Dave