Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-03 Thread Robert Dionne
Chris,

  This is an excellent idea. Currently the entire suite of browser tests are 
also run from the command line, where we overload the CouchDB definition and 
use couchjs. We could break the suite out with a subset staying in 
share/www/script/test  to be used as you suggest, and the lion's share of them 
moving to test/javascript  to be run as part of make check. They serve a 
great role in testing end-end but go a little too far in making use of the 
browser. 

   I'll take a closer look at this over the weekend.

Best,

Bob





On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Chris Anderson wrote:

 I agree, the browser tests should move to the command line, and a
 small subset (30 seconds tops) of tests should be in the browser
 (useful for debugging proxy config, installation, spidermonkey
 version, or whatever. I'd rather not block 1.1 on rewriting the test
 suite, even though I agree the browser suite has started to outgrow
 itself.
 
 I am happy to report that all tests pass on my machine (basically
 stock macbook air).
 
 +1 from me.
 
 Thanks to everyone who helped with 1.1.
 
 Chris
 
 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
 
 On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
 
 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
 Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote 
 to +1 now.
 
 I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
 
 Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
 
 Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
 4 is also most of the issue.
 
 Could be. :)
 
 DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!
 
 (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Chris Anderson
 http://jchrisa.net
 http://couchbase.com



Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-03 Thread Jan Lehnardt

On 3 Jun 2011, at 11:09, Robert Dionne wrote:

 Chris,
 
  This is an excellent idea. Currently the entire suite of browser tests are 
 also run from the command line, where we overload the CouchDB definition and 
 use couchjs. We could break the suite out with a subset staying in 
 share/www/script/test  to be used as you suggest, and the lion's share of 
 them moving to test/javascript  to be run as part of make check. They serve 
 a great role in testing end-end but go a little too far in making use of the 
 browser. 
 
   I'll take a closer look at this over the weekend.

Related: 

  
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201010.mbox/%3c4897047e-3c28-4ff4-900f-ff564bbc3...@apache.org%3e

I still intend to commit this once 1.1.0 is out :)

Cheers
Jan
-- 



 
 Best,
 
 Bob
 
 
 
 
 
 On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Chris Anderson wrote:
 
 I agree, the browser tests should move to the command line, and a
 small subset (30 seconds tops) of tests should be in the browser
 (useful for debugging proxy config, installation, spidermonkey
 version, or whatever. I'd rather not block 1.1 on rewriting the test
 suite, even though I agree the browser suite has started to outgrow
 itself.
 
 I am happy to report that all tests pass on my machine (basically
 stock macbook air).
 
 +1 from me.
 
 Thanks to everyone who helped with 1.1.
 
 Chris
 
 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
 
 On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
 
 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
 Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote 
 to +1 now.
 
 I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to 
 Chrome.
 
 Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
 
 Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
 4 is also most of the issue.
 
 Could be. :)
 
 DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!
 
 (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Chris Anderson
 http://jchrisa.net
 http://couchbase.com
 



Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-02 Thread Dave Cottlehuber
Top posting to Bob's top posting, same for me. FF 4.0.1 has been fine
on R14B01 / 03 also, when I remember to clear cache. Chrome also seems
to be fine  I've had no issues with safari current mac version either
but not tested either systematically.

@nslater when it hangs is there anything of note happening in the
erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone!

A+
Dave
insert smiley of choice here

On 2 June 2011 09:40, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'll note that I exclusively use firefox 4.0.1 and the test suite
 passes reliably in it of R14B01/02/03 (now that the replication bug is
 fixed).

 B.

 On 1 June 2011 21:55, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
 Just tangentially FYI:

 From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by 
 success or failure per browser and version:

  http://friendpaste.com/6GBZiLCVRF3t4JcLFqLKQ9

 Cheers
 Jan
 --



 On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:48, Noah Slater wrote:


 On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote:

 FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
 Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
 versions of the test scripts cached.

 I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.






Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Hi Peter,

thanks for cheering from the sidelines, you vote is most welcome :)

Here's a link that should get you up to speed with the
procedure and tell you what is expected or not:

  http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

Let us know if you have any questions :)

Cheers
Jan
-- 

On 2 Jun 2011, at 04:26, Peter Nolan wrote:

 well, i view myself as neither an active player nor a sidelined player but
 an eager first row fan in this community that looks forward to the advances
 in this couch 'game'.
 
 With minimal understanding of what would/wouldn't make a good release, my
 vote should have marginal weight.
 
 To quote, the streets
 
 lets push things forward.
 
 
 +0



Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-02 Thread Robert Newson
mostly for fun, I did more testing than our standard procedure to even
begin each round of this releasel

+1

Mac OS X 10.6.7, erlang R14B03, firefox 4.0.1

digests and sigs verified.

make check and Futon all clear (have to clear cache, though).

As part of preparing for round 3 I ran all the above tests (and more)
on R14B01 and R14B02 as well.

B.

On 2 June 2011 09:50, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
 Hi Peter,

 thanks for cheering from the sidelines, you vote is most welcome :)

 Here's a link that should get you up to speed with the
 procedure and tell you what is expected or not:

  http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

 Let us know if you have any questions :)

 Cheers
 Jan
 --

 On 2 Jun 2011, at 04:26, Peter Nolan wrote:

 well, i view myself as neither an active player nor a sidelined player but
 an eager first row fan in this community that looks forward to the advances
 in this couch 'game'.

 With minimal understanding of what would/wouldn't make a good release, my
 vote should have marginal weight.

 To quote, the streets

 lets push things forward.


 +0




Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-02 Thread Noah Slater

On 2 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:

 @nslater when it hangs is there anything of note happening in the
 erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone!

Nope, nothing.



Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-02 Thread Paul Davis
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:

 On 2 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:

 @nslater when it hangs is there anything of note happening in the
 erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone!

 Nope, nothing.



If Chrome passed fine I'm guessing the error is in the browser.


Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-02 Thread Noah Slater

On 2 Jun 2011, at 14:38, Jan Lehnardt wrote:

 I've seen this in the past occasionally, where the test suite does
 a _restart and then waits forever for CouchDB to come back. The
 Erlang console will show the regular startup procedure output, but
 then it just waits there for requests. I have verified that it
 actually *does* accept requests when it is in this state. Maybe
 it is the wait for restart routine that has a bug or triggers 
 one inside Firefox.

Oh yes, restarting Firefox and running new tests works.

CouchDB is sat there, happily waiting to requests.

The problem is with the test code.




Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Noah Slater
Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away.

Unit tests fail for me.

-

replicator_db
error
3001ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}

rev_stemming
error
7ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}

rewrite
error
10ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}

security_validation
error
6ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}

show_documents
error
11ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}

stats
error
7ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}

update_documents
error
5ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}

users_db
error
4ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}

-

Tried to re-run these tests in with debug on, but Firefox locked up.

The tests lock up on me all the time. And I don't mean, while they're running 
through, as expected. When they fail, or I try to restart one, basically, the 
whole thing just freezes. I never seem to be able to do much more, other than 
restart Firefox. I'm not sure why this happens, but I really wish it wouldn't. 
Makes testing harder than it could be.

-

After restarting Firefox all these tests pass.

Very weird.

Going to run the whole test suite again.

—

auth_cache fails

assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed

assertion hits_after == hits_before failed

cookie_auth fails

error: file_exists

The test suite then hung on replicator_db again.

Killing Firefox and trying again.

—

auth_cache fails

assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed

assertion hits_after == hits_before failed

The test suite then hung on replicator_db again.

Killing Firefox and trying again, manually.

Note I was not able to get debug output because the test suite hangs Firefox.

I don't see anything happening in the CouchDB log either.

So my best guess is that Firefox is just looping over something mindlessly.

—

Running auth_cache manually lots of times produces no errors.

Running through all the tests manually from the start.

cookie_auth fails again for the same reason.

Ran with debug:

Exception raised: {message:ddoc is 
null,fileName:http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js,lineNumber:41,stack:;()@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js:41\u000arun_on_modified_server([object
 Array],(function () {try {var usersDb = new CouchDB(\test_suite_users\, 
{'X-Couch-Full-Commit': \false\});usersDb.deleteDb();usersDb.createDb();var 
ddoc = usersDb.open(\_design/_auth\);T(ddoc.validate_doc_update);var password 
= \3.141592653589\;var jasonUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \Jason 
Davies\, roles: [\dev\]}, password);T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);var 
checkDoc = usersDb.open(jasonUserDoc._id);T(checkDoc.name == \Jason 
Davies\);var jchrisUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: 
\jch...@apache.org\}, \funnybone\);T(usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc).ok);var 
duplicateJchrisDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \jch...@apache.org\}, 
\eh, Boo-Boo?\);try {usersDb.save(duplicateJchrisDoc);T(false  \Can't 
create duplicate user names. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) 
{T(e.error == \conflict\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 409);}var 
underscoreUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \_why\}, 
\copperfield\);try {usersDb.save(underscoreUserDoc);T(false  \Can't create 
underscore user names. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error 
== \forbidden\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}var badIdDoc = 
CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \foo\},  \bar\);badIdDoc._id = 
\org.apache.couchdb:w00x\;try {usersDb.save(badIdDoc);T(false  \Can't 
create malformed docids. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error 
== \forbidden\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(CouchDB.login(\Jason 
Davies\, password).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \Jason 
Davies\);var xhr = CouchDB.request(\POST\, \/_session\, {headers: 
{'Content-Type': \application/json\}, body: JSON.stringify({name: \Jason 
Davies\, password: 
password})});T(JSON.parse(xhr.responseText).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name
 == \Jason Davies\);jasonUserDoc.foo = 
2;T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\_admin\)
 == -1);try {usersDb.deleteDoc(jchrisUserDoc);T(false  \Can't delete other 
users docs. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error == 
\forbidden\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(!CouchDB.login(\Jason 
Davies\, \2.71828\).ok);T(!CouchDB.login(\Robert Allen Zimmerman\, 
\d00d\).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name != \Jason Davies\);xhr = 
CouchDB.request(\POST\, \/_session?next=/\, {headers: {'Content-Type': 
\application/x-www-form-urlencoded\}, body: \name=Jason%20Daviespassword=\ 
+ encodeURIComponent(password)});if (xhr.status == 200) 
{T(/Welcome/.test(xhr.responseText));} else {T(xhr.status == 
302);T(xhr.getResponseHeader(\Location\));}T(CouchDB.login(\jch...@apache.org\,
 \funnybone\).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == 
\jch...@apache.org\);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.length == 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Robert Dionne
Noah,

  Does make check run with all the etaps passing? 

Bob



On Jun 1, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Noah Slater wrote:

 Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away.
 
 Unit tests fail for me.
 
 -
 
 replicator_db
 error
 3001ms
 Run with debugger
   • Exception raised: {}
 
 rev_stemming
 error
 7ms
 Run with debugger
   • Exception raised: {}
 
 rewrite
 error
 10ms
 Run with debugger
   • Exception raised: {}
 
 security_validation
 error
 6ms
 Run with debugger
   • Exception raised: {}
 
 show_documents
 error
 11ms
 Run with debugger
   • Exception raised: {}
 
 stats
 error
 7ms
 Run with debugger
   • Exception raised: {}
 
 update_documents
 error
 5ms
 Run with debugger
   • Exception raised: {}
 
 users_db
 error
 4ms
 Run with debugger
   • Exception raised: {}
 
 -
 
 Tried to re-run these tests in with debug on, but Firefox locked up.
 
 The tests lock up on me all the time. And I don't mean, while they're running 
 through, as expected. When they fail, or I try to restart one, basically, the 
 whole thing just freezes. I never seem to be able to do much more, other than 
 restart Firefox. I'm not sure why this happens, but I really wish it 
 wouldn't. Makes testing harder than it could be.
 
 -
 
 After restarting Firefox all these tests pass.
 
 Very weird.
 
 Going to run the whole test suite again.
 
 —
 
 auth_cache fails
 
 assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
 
 assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
 
 cookie_auth fails
 
 error: file_exists
 
 The test suite then hung on replicator_db again.
 
 Killing Firefox and trying again.
 
 —
 
 auth_cache fails
 
 assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
 
 assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
 
 The test suite then hung on replicator_db again.
 
 Killing Firefox and trying again, manually.
 
 Note I was not able to get debug output because the test suite hangs Firefox.
 
 I don't see anything happening in the CouchDB log either.
 
 So my best guess is that Firefox is just looping over something mindlessly.
 
 —
 
 Running auth_cache manually lots of times produces no errors.
 
 Running through all the tests manually from the start.
 
 cookie_auth fails again for the same reason.
 
 Ran with debug:
 
 Exception raised: {message:ddoc is 
 null,fileName:http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js,lineNumber:41,stack:;()@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js:41\u000arun_on_modified_server([object
  Array],(function () {try {var usersDb = new CouchDB(\test_suite_users\, 
 {'X-Couch-Full-Commit': \false\});usersDb.deleteDb();usersDb.createDb();var 
 ddoc = usersDb.open(\_design/_auth\);T(ddoc.validate_doc_update);var 
 password = \3.141592653589\;var jasonUserDoc = 
 CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \Jason Davies\, roles: [\dev\]}, 
 password);T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);var checkDoc = 
 usersDb.open(jasonUserDoc._id);T(checkDoc.name == \Jason Davies\);var 
 jchrisUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \jch...@apache.org\}, 
 \funnybone\);T(usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc).ok);var duplicateJchrisDoc = 
 CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \jch...@apache.org\}, \eh, Boo-Boo?\);try 
 {usersDb.save(duplicateJchrisDoc);T(false  \Can't create duplicate user 
 names. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error == 
 \conflict\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 409);}var underscoreUserDoc = 
 CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \_why\}, \copperfield\);try 
 {usersDb.save(underscoreUserDoc);T(false  \Can't create underscore user 
 names. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error == 
 \forbidden\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}var badIdDoc = 
 CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \foo\},  \bar\);badIdDoc._id = 
 \org.apache.couchdb:w00x\;try {usersDb.save(badIdDoc);T(false  \Can't 
 create malformed docids. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) 
 {T(e.error == \forbidden\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 
 403);}T(CouchDB.login(\Jason Davies\, 
 password).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \Jason Davies\);var xhr = 
 CouchDB.request(\POST\, \/_session\, {headers: {'Content-Type': 
 \application/json\}, body: JSON.stringify({name: \Jason Davies\, 
 password: 
 password})});T(JSON.parse(xhr.responseText).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name
  == \Jason Davies\);jasonUserDoc.foo = 
 2;T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\_admin\)
  == -1);try {usersDb.deleteDoc(jchrisUserDoc);T(false  \Can't delete other 
 users docs. Should have thrown an error.\);} catch (e) {T(e.error == 
 \forbidden\);T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(!CouchDB.login(\Jason 
 Davies\, \2.71828\).ok);T(!CouchDB.login(\Robert Allen Zimmerman\, 
 \d00d\).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name != \Jason Davies\);xhr = 
 CouchDB.request(\POST\, \/_session?next=/\, {headers: {'Content-Type': 
 \application/x-www-form-urlencoded\}, body: 
 \name=Jason%20Daviespassword=\ + encodeURIComponent(password)});if 
 (xhr.status == 200) 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
 Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away.

 Unit tests fail for me.

 -

 replicator_db
 error
 3001ms
 Run with debugger
        • Exception raised: {}

 rev_stemming
 error
 7ms
 Run with debugger
        • Exception raised: {}

 rewrite
 error
 10ms
 Run with debugger
        • Exception raised: {}

 security_validation
 error
 6ms
 Run with debugger
        • Exception raised: {}

 show_documents
 error
 11ms
 Run with debugger
        • Exception raised: {}

 stats
 error
 7ms
 Run with debugger
        • Exception raised: {}

 update_documents
 error
 5ms
 Run with debugger
        • Exception raised: {}

 users_db
 error
 4ms
 Run with debugger
        • Exception raised: {}


This usually indicates that something broked on the server. I've only
seen it in corner cases where I segfault in a NIF or similar. Did you
check if couch was still running?

 auth_cache fails

 assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed

 assertion hits_after == hits_before failed


This is related to browser cache. Command-Shift-R and the cache sweep
button usually fixes it.

 cookie_auth fails

 error: file_exists


Didn't we just fix this?

 Gonna give this -1 until we fix the unit tests.

 I wonder whether anyone else runs the unit tests at all, sometimes! ;)

I ran them on Chrome and they passed just fine. Perhaps its a FF issue
that no-one has noticed yet. Also, you don't have Firebug turned on do
you? That can screw with things.


Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Noah Slater

On 1 Jun 2011, at 19:21, Paul Davis wrote:

 This usually indicates that something broked on the server. I've only
 seen it in corner cases where I segfault in a NIF or similar. Did you
 check if couch was still running?

Couch was running, and the tests afterwards all passed.

 auth_cache fails
 
 assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
 
 assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
 
 
 This is related to browser cache. Command-Shift-R and the cache sweep
 button usually fixes it.

Should the tests work around this?

 cookie_auth fails
 
 error: file_exists
 
 
 Didn't we just fix this?

Evidently not. ;)

 Gonna give this -1 until we fix the unit tests.
 
 I wonder whether anyone else runs the unit tests at all, sometimes! ;)
 
 I ran them on Chrome and they passed just fine. Perhaps its a FF issue
 that no-one has noticed yet. Also, you don't have Firebug turned on do
 you? That can screw with things.

I don't even have it installed!

Just ran the tests in Chrome and they all pass.

What gives?




Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Noah Slater
Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 
now.

I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.

Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Noah Slater

On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
 Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to 
 +1 now.
 
 I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
 
 Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
 
 Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
 4 is also most of the issue.

Could be. :)

DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!

(I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)



Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:

 On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
 Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to 
 +1 now.

 I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.

 Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.

 Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
 4 is also most of the issue.

 Could be. :)

 DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!

 (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)



I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its
excellent HTTP support.


Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Jan Lehnardt

On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
 
 On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
 
 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
 Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote 
 to +1 now.
 
 I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
 
 Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
 
 Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
 4 is also most of the issue.
 
 Could be. :)
 
 DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!
 
 (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
 
 
 
 I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its
 excellent HTTP support.

insertwittyreply

(I've got nothing)

-- 



Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Randall Leeds
FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
versions of the test scripts cached.

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:

 On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:

 On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
 Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote 
 to +1 now.

 I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to 
 Chrome.

 Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.

 Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
 4 is also most of the issue.

 Could be. :)

 DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!

 (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)



 I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its
 excellent HTTP support.

 insertwittyreply

 (I've got nothing)

 --




Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Paul Davis
What version of FF? 3.5 or newer?

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote:
 FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
 Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
 versions of the test scripts cached.

 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:

 On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:

 On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
 Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote 
 to +1 now.

 I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to 
 Chrome.

 Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.

 Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
 4 is also most of the issue.

 Could be. :)

 DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!

 (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)



 I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its
 excellent HTTP support.

 insertwittyreply

 (I've got nothing)

 --





Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Adam Kocoloski
On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
 
 Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
 
 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
 
 We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts 
 so
 that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone 
 is
 free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
 
 We are voting on the following release artifacts:
 
 http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
 
 These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
 
 Please follow our test procedure:
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
 
 Happy voting,
 
 B.

I'm +1 on releasing these artifacts, but I would like to note that, contrary to 
the INSTALL.Unix instructions, CouchDB 1.1 will not work on Erlang/OTP R12B05.  
We should update the docs in a future patch release.  Cheers,

Adam

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Randall Leeds
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:29, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
 What version of FF? 3.5 or newer?


4.0.1

 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote:
 FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
 Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
 versions of the test scripts cached.

 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:

 On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:

 On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
 Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my 
 vote to +1 now.

 I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to 
 Chrome.

 Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.

 Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
 4 is also most of the issue.

 Could be. :)

 DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!

 (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)



 I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its
 excellent HTTP support.

 insertwittyreply

 (I've got nothing)

 --






Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Noah Slater

On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote:

 FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
 Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
 versions of the test scripts cached.

I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.




Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Just tangentially FYI:

From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by 
success or failure per browser and version:

  http://friendpaste.com/6GBZiLCVRF3t4JcLFqLKQ9

Cheers
Jan
-- 



On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:48, Noah Slater wrote:

 
 On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote:
 
 FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
 Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
 versions of the test scripts cached.
 
 I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.




Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Robert Newson
I'll note that I exclusively use firefox 4.0.1 and the test suite
passes reliably in it of R14B01/02/03 (now that the replication bug is
fixed).

B.

On 1 June 2011 21:55, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
 Just tangentially FYI:

 From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by 
 success or failure per browser and version:

  http://friendpaste.com/6GBZiLCVRF3t4JcLFqLKQ9

 Cheers
 Jan
 --



 On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:48, Noah Slater wrote:


 On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote:

 FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
 Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
 versions of the test scripts cached.

 I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.





Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Peter Nolan
/me votes 'present'.


Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-06-01 Thread Peter Nolan
well, i view myself as neither an active player nor a sidelined player but
an eager first row fan in this community that looks forward to the advances
in this couch 'game'.

With minimal understanding of what would/wouldn't make a good release, my
vote should have marginal weight.

To quote, the streets

lets push things forward.


+0


Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-31 Thread Robert Dionne
+1

OS X 10.6 
Erlang 14B01
All tests pass



On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
 
 Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
 
 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
 
 We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts 
 so
 that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone 
 is
 free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
 
 We are voting on the following release artifacts:
 
 http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
 
 These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
 
 Please follow our test procedure:
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
 
 Happy voting,
 
 B.



Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-31 Thread Filipe David Manana
Verified, +1

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Robert Dionne
dio...@dionne-associates.com wrote:
 +1

 OS X 10.6
 Erlang 14B01
 All tests pass



 On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote:

 Hello,

 I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

 Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;

 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).

 We encourage the whole community to download and test these release 
 artifacts so
 that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. 
 Everyone is
 free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!

 We are voting on the following release artifacts:

 http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/

 These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0

 Please follow our test procedure:

 http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure

 Happy voting,

 B.





-- 
Filipe David Manana,
fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org

Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
 Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
 That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men.


Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-31 Thread Dave Cottlehuber
On 31 May 2011 20:55, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
 Hi Robert,

 I want to second the others' gratitude for your help pushing 1.1.0 out.

What Jan said!
This release has been a real saga and you are awesome!!

A+
Dave


Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-31 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 15:23, Dave Cottlehuber d...@muse.net.nz wrote:
 What Jan said!
 This release has been a real saga and you are awesome!!

+1.

(I've tried the release and make check passes for me. I don't think
any of the browsers I run are supported for the Futon tests, so I'm
skipping those -- but most look good, anyway.)

Cheesr,

Dirkjan


Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-31 Thread Sam Bisbee
Howdy,

The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work!

Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3:

  - SHA passes
  - `make check` passes all tests
  - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though
Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps
hanging the browser with unresponsive script dialogs).
  - Root URL signature is correct

Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on
jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1095523). We need
to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases.

-1

Cheers,

--
Sam Bisbee
www.sbisbee.com

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
 Hello,

 I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

 Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;

 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).

 We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts 
 so
 that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone 
 is
 free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!

 We are voting on the following release artifacts:

  http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/

 These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:

  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0

 Please follow our test procedure:

 http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure

 Happy voting,

 B.



Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-31 Thread Jan Lehnardt

On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote:

 Howdy,
 
 The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work!
 
 Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3:
 
  - SHA passes
  - `make check` passes all tests
  - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though
 Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps
 hanging the browser with unresponsive script dialogs).
  - Root URL signature is correct
 
 Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on
 jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131
 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1095523). We need
 to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases.

The required mentions are in the commit you reference:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE?r1=1095523r2=1095522pathrev=1095523
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/LICENSE?r1=1095523r2=1095522pathrev=1095523

Cheers
Jan
-- 


 
 -1
 
 Cheers,
 
 --
 Sam Bisbee
 www.sbisbee.com
 
 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
 
 Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
 
 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
 
 We encourage the whole community to download and test these release 
 artifacts so
 that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. 
 Everyone is
 free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
 
 We are voting on the following release artifacts:
 
  http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
 
 These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
 
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
 
 Please follow our test procedure:
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
 
 Happy voting,
 
 B.
 



Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-31 Thread Sam Bisbee
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:

 On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote:

 Howdy,

 The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work!

 Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3:

  - SHA passes
  - `make check` passes all tests
  - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though
 Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps
 hanging the browser with unresponsive script dialogs).
  - Root URL signature is correct

 Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on
 jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131
 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1095523). We need
 to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases.

 The required mentions are in the commit you reference:

 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE?r1=1095523r2=1095522pathrev=1095523
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/LICENSE?r1=1095523r2=1095522pathrev=1095523

 Cheers
 Jan

I am surprised that it does not need to be in CHANGES, but since that
is the case and everything else looks so awesome, I am +1 now on the
release.

Cheers,

-- 
Sam Bisbee
www.sbisbee.com


Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-31 Thread Jan Lehnardt

On 31 May 2011, at 17:51, Sam Bisbee wrote:

 On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
 
 On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote:
 
 Howdy,
 
 The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work!
 
 Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3:
 
  - SHA passes
  - `make check` passes all tests
  - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though
 Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps
 hanging the browser with unresponsive script dialogs).
  - Root URL signature is correct
 
 Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on
 jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131
 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1095523). We need
 to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases.
 
 The required mentions are in the commit you reference:
 
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE?r1=1095523r2=1095522pathrev=1095523
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/LICENSE?r1=1095523r2=1095522pathrev=1095523
 
 Cheers
 Jan
 
 I am surprised that it does not need to be in CHANGES, but since that
 is the case and everything else looks so awesome, I am +1 now on the
 release.

I agree it'd be nice to have this in CHANGES, but AFAIK this is not required. I 
would not consider this a showstopper though, so thanks for changing your vote 
:)

Cheers
Jan
-- 



Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-31 Thread Sebastian Cohnen
OS X 10.6.7, Erlang R14B03

+1

* signatures: ok
* make check: ok
* browser test suite: Firefox 4.0.1  Safari 5.0.5: ok

Great work!

On 31.05.2011, at 00:25, Robert Newson wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
 
 Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
 
 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
 
 We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts 
 so
 that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone 
 is
 free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
 
 We are voting on the following release artifacts:
 
 http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
 
 These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
 
 Please follow our test procedure:
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
 
 Happy voting,
 
 B.



[VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-30 Thread Robert Newson
Hello,

I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;

1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).

We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!

We are voting on the following release artifacts:

 http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/

These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0

Please follow our test procedure:

http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure

Happy voting,

B.


Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-30 Thread Randall Leeds
* Signature OK
* MD5 OK
* SHA1 OK
* Make check OK
* Futon OK

+1

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:25, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
 Hello,

 I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

 Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;

 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).

 We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts 
 so
 that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone 
 is
 free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!

 We are voting on the following release artifacts:

  http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/

 These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:

  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0

 Please follow our test procedure:

 http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure

 Happy voting,

 B.



Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-30 Thread Paul J. Davis
+1 here. Motions pass on latest OS X. 

On May 30, 2011, at 8:09 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote:

 * Signature OK
 * MD5 OK
 * SHA1 OK
 * Make check OK
 * Futon OK
 
 +1
 
 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:25, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
 
 Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
 
 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
 
 We encourage the whole community to download and test these release 
 artifacts so
 that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. 
 Everyone is
 free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
 
 We are voting on the following release artifacts:
 
  http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
 
 These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
 
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
 
 Please follow our test procedure:
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
 
 Happy voting,
 
 B.
 


Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-30 Thread till
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
 Hello,

 I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

 Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;

 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).

 We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts 
 so
 that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone 
 is
 free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!

 We are voting on the following release artifacts:

  http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/

 These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:

  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0

 Please follow our test procedure:

 http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure

 Happy voting,

 B.


Ubuntu (10.04):
All tests successful.
Files=41, Tests=735, 73 wallclock secs ( 0.44 usr  0.11 sys + 18.82
cusr  2.52 csys = 21.89 CPU)
Result: PASS

FreeBSD:
All tests successful.
Files=41, Tests=735, 85 wallclock secs (20.09 cusr +  3.78 csys = 23.87 CPU)

+1

@Robert: Thanks very, very much for pulling through on this release!
This is really, really appreciated!

Till


Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

2011-05-30 Thread Dave Cottlehuber
On 31 May 2011 10:25, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
 Hello,

 I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.

 Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;

 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).

 We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts 
 so
 that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone 
 is
 free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!

 We are voting on the following release artifacts:

  http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/

 These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:

  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0

 Please follow our test procedure:

 http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure

 Happy voting,

 B.


+1

- md5 ok
- sha1 ok

Mac OS X 10.6.7 + erlang R14B01
- make check ok
- futon ok (via ff 4.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7)

Mac OS X 10.6.7 + erlang R14B03
- make check ok
- futon ok (via ff 4.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7)

Windows 7 Enterprise + erlang R14B01
- make check n/a as usual (note to self to fix this)
- futon ok (via ff 4.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7)

woo!!!

A+
Dave