Re: Preparing the 1.0.2 release

2010-11-24 Thread Filipe David Manana
Paul,

you have my +1

cheers

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
 This email is to request that the CouchDB developer community provide
 comments on moving forward with the 1.0.2 release. I am instructed to
 specifically ask that developers check the NEWS and CHANGES files in
 the 1.0.x branch to ensure that they list all of the applicable
 information.

 Thanks,
 Paul Davis




-- 
Filipe David Manana,
fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org

Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
 Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
 That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men.


Re: Preparing the 1.0.2 release

2010-11-24 Thread Jeroen Janssen
Hi,

I was wondering about the 4+Gb append issue on Windows which has a
patch pending in Erlang.
This issue (indirectly) influences CouchDB's usefullness for larger
databases on the Windows platform.

Is this (more explicitly) being mentioned somewhere and/or will there
be a new couchdb release when a new Erlang (containing that patch) is
released?
i.e. this is more of a how to deal with 'couchdb depends on external
software which contains a certain important bug' question.

Best regards,

Jeroen

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
 This email is to request that the CouchDB developer community provide
 comments on moving forward with the 1.0.2 release. I am instructed to
 specifically ask that developers check the NEWS and CHANGES files in
 the 1.0.x branch to ensure that they list all of the applicable
 information.

 Thanks,
 Paul Davis



Re: Preparing the 1.0.2 release

2010-11-24 Thread Filipe David Manana
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Jeroen Janssen
jeroen.jans...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I was wondering about the 4+Gb append issue on Windows which has a
 patch pending in Erlang.
 This issue (indirectly) influences CouchDB's usefullness for larger
 databases on the Windows platform.

Right.


 Is this (more explicitly) being mentioned somewhere and/or will there
 be a new couchdb release when a new Erlang (containing that patch) is
 released?

The fix is on the OTP side, there's nothing to change in CouchDB.

 i.e. this is more of a how to deal with 'couchdb depends on external
 software which contains a certain important bug' question.

There's are some non-official Windows builds of OTP with the fix applied.
See the top section at http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Installing_on_Windows


 Best regards,

cheers

 Jeroen

 On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 This email is to request that the CouchDB developer community provide
 comments on moving forward with the 1.0.2 release. I am instructed to
 specifically ask that developers check the NEWS and CHANGES files in
 the 1.0.x branch to ensure that they list all of the applicable
 information.

 Thanks,
 Paul Davis





-- 
Filipe David Manana,
fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org

Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
 Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
 That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men.


Re: Preparing the 1.0.2 release

2010-11-24 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Jeroen Janssen
jeroen.jans...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I was wondering about the 4+Gb append issue on Windows which has a
 patch pending in Erlang.
 This issue (indirectly) influences CouchDB's usefullness for larger
 databases on the Windows platform.

 Is this (more explicitly) being mentioned somewhere and/or will there
 be a new couchdb release when a new Erlang (containing that patch) is
 released?
 i.e. this is more of a how to deal with 'couchdb depends on external
 software which contains a certain important bug' question.

 Best regards,

 Jeroen


I'm not entirely certain on the specifics. Perhaps there should be a
note on the wiki page or near the windows packages this specific fact,
but assuming that no code changes in CouchDB are required then I'd
consider this a documentation thing as we used to have to do with the
5.5.5 VM.

HTH,
Paul Davis

 On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 This email is to request that the CouchDB developer community provide
 comments on moving forward with the 1.0.2 release. I am instructed to
 specifically ask that developers check the NEWS and CHANGES files in
 the 1.0.x branch to ensure that they list all of the applicable
 information.

 Thanks,
 Paul Davis




Re: Preparing the 1.0.2 release

2010-11-24 Thread Jeroen Janssen
Hi,

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Filipe David Manana  Right.
 The fix is on the OTP side, there's nothing to change in CouchDB.

Yes I know, but the official CouchDB Windows installer also includes Erlang.

 i.e. this is more of a how to deal with 'couchdb depends on external
 software which contains a certain important bug' question.

 There's are some non-official Windows builds of OTP with the fix applied.
 See the top section at http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Installing_on_Windows

Ok, I see that section was recently added, so I missed it before.
As far as I can tell, that seems documented enough to me.

Best regards,

Jeroen


Re: Preparing the 1.0.2 release

2010-11-24 Thread Filipe David Manana
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Jeroen Janssen
jeroen.jans...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Filipe David Manana  Right.
 The fix is on the OTP side, there's nothing to change in CouchDB.

 Yes I know, but the official CouchDB Windows installer also includes Erlang.

Oh, I wasn't aware of that. So yes, it makes sense to me as well to
make a new installer once there's an official OTP release with the
fix.

cheers


 i.e. this is more of a how to deal with 'couchdb depends on external
 software which contains a certain important bug' question.

 There's are some non-official Windows builds of OTP with the fix applied.
 See the top section at http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Installing_on_Windows

 Ok, I see that section was recently added, so I missed it before.
 As far as I can tell, that seems documented enough to me.

 Best regards,

 Jeroen




-- 
Filipe David Manana,
fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org

Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
 Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
 That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men.


Re: Preparing the 1.0.2 release

2010-11-24 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Paul Davis
paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
 This email is to request that the CouchDB developer community provide
 comments on moving forward with the 1.0.2 release. I am instructed to
 specifically ask that developers check the NEWS and CHANGES files in
 the 1.0.x branch to ensure that they list all of the applicable
 information.

 Thanks,
 Paul Davis


This is *NOT* a vote on releasing 1.0.2.

I've gone through the directions for preparing a release and I'd like
to get some feedback on the artefacts themselves. This means things
like verifying the tarball signature, the sha1 and md5 checksums and
whether the tarball is missing anything.

To check the signatures, you can use the directions at [1]. The
artefacts themselves are located at [2].

To check what's in the tarball vs what's not you can do this:

$ mkdir tmp  cd tmp
$ svn export http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2
$ wget http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/apache-couchdb-1.0.2.tar.gz
$ tar -xvzf apache-couchdb-1.0.2.tar.gz
$ diff -r apache-couchdb-1.0.2 1.0.2

I repeat, this is *NOT* a vote on the release. We're merely working on
improving our bus factor.

Thanks,
Paul Davis

[1] http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/
[2] http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/


Re: Preparing the 1.0.2 release

2010-11-24 Thread Noah Slater
I have an hour or two to help you through this process Paul.

Are you around on IRC?

On 24 Nov 2010, at 20:34, Paul Davis wrote:

 On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Paul Davis
 paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
 This email is to request that the CouchDB developer community provide
 comments on moving forward with the 1.0.2 release. I am instructed to
 specifically ask that developers check the NEWS and CHANGES files in
 the 1.0.x branch to ensure that they list all of the applicable
 information.
 
 Thanks,
 Paul Davis
 
 
 This is *NOT* a vote on releasing 1.0.2.
 
 I've gone through the directions for preparing a release and I'd like
 to get some feedback on the artefacts themselves. This means things
 like verifying the tarball signature, the sha1 and md5 checksums and
 whether the tarball is missing anything.
 
 To check the signatures, you can use the directions at [1]. The
 artefacts themselves are located at [2].
 
 To check what's in the tarball vs what's not you can do this:
 
 $ mkdir tmp  cd tmp
 $ svn export http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2
 $ wget http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/apache-couchdb-1.0.2.tar.gz
 $ tar -xvzf apache-couchdb-1.0.2.tar.gz
 $ diff -r apache-couchdb-1.0.2 1.0.2
 
 I repeat, this is *NOT* a vote on the release. We're merely working on
 improving our bus factor.
 
 Thanks,
 Paul Davis
 
 [1] http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/
 [2] http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/



Re: Preparing the 1.0.2 release

2010-11-24 Thread Paul J. Davis
I've already got the bits made, if you can double check what's online, that'd 
be great. Unfortunately I'm already back in Iowa so free time will be hit or 
miss.

Paul Davis

On Nov 24, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:

 I have an hour or two to help you through this process Paul.
 
 Are you around on IRC?
 
 On 24 Nov 2010, at 20:34, Paul Davis wrote:
 
 On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Paul Davis
 paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
 This email is to request that the CouchDB developer community provide
 comments on moving forward with the 1.0.2 release. I am instructed to
 specifically ask that developers check the NEWS and CHANGES files in
 the 1.0.x branch to ensure that they list all of the applicable
 information.
 
 Thanks,
 Paul Davis
 
 
 This is *NOT* a vote on releasing 1.0.2.
 
 I've gone through the directions for preparing a release and I'd like
 to get some feedback on the artefacts themselves. This means things
 like verifying the tarball signature, the sha1 and md5 checksums and
 whether the tarball is missing anything.
 
 To check the signatures, you can use the directions at [1]. The
 artefacts themselves are located at [2].
 
 To check what's in the tarball vs what's not you can do this:
 
 $ mkdir tmp  cd tmp
 $ svn export http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2
 $ wget 
 http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/apache-couchdb-1.0.2.tar.gz
 $ tar -xvzf apache-couchdb-1.0.2.tar.gz
 $ diff -r apache-couchdb-1.0.2 1.0.2
 
 I repeat, this is *NOT* a vote on the release. We're merely working on
 improving our bus factor.
 
 Thanks,
 Paul Davis
 
 [1] http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/
 [2] http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/