Re: gitbox?

2018-05-02 Thread Vlad Rozov

All-

Drill was moved to gitbox. Please see update to 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16411.


Committers and PMC, please note a one time action required on your side 
to enable write access on github.


Thank you,

Vlad

On 4/20/18 15:40, Parth Chandra wrote:

Created INFRA request: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16411

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Parth Chandra <par...@apache.org> wrote:


Great.
Just as an additional clarification, once gitbox is enabled, we will not
need to have a remote set up to point to Apache hosted repository (you can
still point to the Apache github mirror) as it will no longer be
accessible.
All commits will be done via github.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Aman Sinha <amansi...@apache.org> wrote:


Yeah, let's go ahead with this.  I don't quite recall Vlad's explanations
in the hangout back in October, but I think we were all convinced, so I am
+1.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Arina Yelchiyeva <
arina.yelchiy...@gmail.com> wrote:


Thanks, Parth, that would be really helpful.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Parth Chandra <par...@apache.org>

wrote:

Hi Drill devs

   If no one has any objections I will open the Apache infra request to

move

to gitbox. Once this is setup, committers will be able to merge/commit
without ever leaving github.

Thanks

Parth

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>

wrote:

My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via
Google and mostly client related results came up.

Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:uw...@xhochy.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM
To: dev@drill.apache.org
Subject: Re: gitbox?

Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git

services

https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.

We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend

switching to

any other Apache project as soon as possible.

Uwe


Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>:

Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's

proven

to be pretty reliable for me for close to a year.

My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.

-Original Message-
From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
Subject: Re: gitbox?

Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge

process.

It

provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the

Apache

Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with

the

Apache master.

The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2)

run

the functional tests if doing a batch commit.

Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.




On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com

wrote:

For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes

of

the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an

absentee.

-Original Message-
From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
Subject: Re: gitbox?

Bumping this thread up.

Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we

would

like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!

Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.

I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.

Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process

document.




On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org>

wrote:

Hi,

As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the

community,

but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider
migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give
committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with

all

the perks that Github

provides.

Thank you,

Vlad







Re: gitbox?

2018-04-20 Thread Parth Chandra
Created INFRA request: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16411

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Parth Chandra <par...@apache.org> wrote:

> Great.
> Just as an additional clarification, once gitbox is enabled, we will not
> need to have a remote set up to point to Apache hosted repository (you can
> still point to the Apache github mirror) as it will no longer be
> accessible.
> All commits will be done via github.
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Aman Sinha <amansi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, let's go ahead with this.  I don't quite recall Vlad's explanations
>> in the hangout back in October, but I think we were all convinced, so I am
>> +1.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Arina Yelchiyeva <
>> arina.yelchiy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks, Parth, that would be really helpful.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Parth Chandra <par...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Drill devs
>> > >
>> > >   If no one has any objections I will open the Apache infra request to
>> > move
>> > > to gitbox. Once this is setup, committers will be able to merge/commit
>> > > without ever leaving github.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > Parth
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via
>> > > > Google and mostly client related results came up.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks!
>> > > >
>> > > > -Original Message-
>> > > > From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:uw...@xhochy.com]
>> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM
>> > > > To: dev@drill.apache.org
>> > > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
>> > > >
>> > > > Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git
>> > > services
>> > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.
>> > > >
>> > > > We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend
>> switching to
>> > > > any other Apache project as soon as possible.
>> > > >
>> > > > Uwe
>> > > >
>> > > > > Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's
>> > proven
>> > > > to be pretty reliable for me for close to a year.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -Original Message-
>> > > > > From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
>> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
>> > > > > To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
>> > > > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge
>> process.
>> > It
>> > > > provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the
>> Apache
>> > > > Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with
>> the
>> > > > Apache master.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2)
>> run
>> > > > the functional tests if doing a batch commit.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes
>> of
>> > > > >> the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an
>> > > > absentee.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> -Original Message-
>> > > > >> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
>> > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
>> > > > >> To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
>> > > > >> Subject: Re: gitbox?
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Bumping this thread up.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we
>> > would
>> > > > >> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process
>> > > > document.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Hi,
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
>> > > > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
>> > > > >>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the
>> community,
>> > > > >>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider
>> > > > >>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give
>> > > > >>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with
>> all
>> > > > >>> the perks that Github
>> > > > >> provides.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Thank you,
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Vlad
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>


Re: gitbox?

2018-04-18 Thread Parth Chandra
Great.
Just as an additional clarification, once gitbox is enabled, we will not
need to have a remote set up to point to Apache hosted repository (you can
still point to the Apache github mirror) as it will no longer be
accessible.
All commits will be done via github.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Aman Sinha <amansi...@apache.org> wrote:

> Yeah, let's go ahead with this.  I don't quite recall Vlad's explanations
> in the hangout back in October, but I think we were all convinced, so I am
> +1.
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Arina Yelchiyeva <
> arina.yelchiy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Parth, that would be really helpful.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Parth Chandra <par...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Drill devs
> > >
> > >   If no one has any objections I will open the Apache infra request to
> > move
> > > to gitbox. Once this is setup, committers will be able to merge/commit
> > > without ever leaving github.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Parth
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via
> > > > Google and mostly client related results came up.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:uw...@xhochy.com]
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM
> > > > To: dev@drill.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > > >
> > > > Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git
> > > services
> > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.
> > > >
> > > > We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend switching
> to
> > > > any other Apache project as soon as possible.
> > > >
> > > > Uwe
> > > >
> > > > > Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's
> > proven
> > > > to be pretty reliable for me for close to a year.
> > > > >
> > > > > My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
> > > > > To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
> > > > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > > > >
> > > > > Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge
> process.
> > It
> > > > provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the
> Apache
> > > > Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the
> > > > Apache master.
> > > > >
> > > > > The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2)
> run
> > > > the functional tests if doing a batch commit.
> > > > >
> > > > > Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of
> > > > >> the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an
> > > > absentee.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -Original Message-
> > > > >> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
> > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
> > > > >> To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
> > > > >> Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Bumping this thread up.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we
> > would
> > > > >> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process
> > > > document.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> > > > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> > > > >>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the
> community,
> > > > >>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider
> > > > >>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give
> > > > >>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with
> all
> > > > >>> the perks that Github
> > > > >> provides.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thank you,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Vlad
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: gitbox?

2018-04-18 Thread Aman Sinha
Yeah, let's go ahead with this.  I don't quite recall Vlad's explanations
in the hangout back in October, but I think we were all convinced, so I am
+1.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Arina Yelchiyeva <
arina.yelchiy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Parth, that would be really helpful.
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Parth Chandra <par...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Drill devs
> >
> >   If no one has any objections I will open the Apache infra request to
> move
> > to gitbox. Once this is setup, committers will be able to merge/commit
> > without ever leaving github.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Parth
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com> wrote:
> >
> > > My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via
> > > Google and mostly client related results came up.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:uw...@xhochy.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM
> > > To: dev@drill.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > >
> > > Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git
> > services
> > > https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.
> > >
> > > We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend switching to
> > > any other Apache project as soon as possible.
> > >
> > > Uwe
> > >
> > > > Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's
> proven
> > > to be pretty reliable for me for close to a year.
> > > >
> > > > My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
> > > > To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
> > > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > > >
> > > > Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge process.
> It
> > > provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the Apache
> > > Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the
> > > Apache master.
> > > >
> > > > The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2) run
> > > the functional tests if doing a batch commit.
> > > >
> > > > Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of
> > > >> the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an
> > > absentee.
> > > >>
> > > >> -Original Message-
> > > >> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
> > > >> To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
> > > >> Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > > >>
> > > >> Bumping this thread up.
> > > >>
> > > >> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we
> would
> > > >> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
> > > >>
> > > >> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
> > > >>
> > > >> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process
> > > document.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> > > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> > > >>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community,
> > > >>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider
> > > >>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give
> > > >>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with all
> > > >>> the perks that Github
> > > >> provides.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thank you,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Vlad
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>


Re: gitbox?

2018-04-18 Thread Arina Yelchiyeva
Thanks, Parth, that would be really helpful.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Parth Chandra <par...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Drill devs
>
>   If no one has any objections I will open the Apache infra request to move
> to gitbox. Once this is setup, committers will be able to merge/commit
> without ever leaving github.
>
> Thanks
>
> Parth
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com> wrote:
>
> > My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via
> > Google and mostly client related results came up.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:uw...@xhochy.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM
> > To: dev@drill.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> >
> > Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git
> services
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.
> >
> > We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend switching to
> > any other Apache project as soon as possible.
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > > Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>:
> > >
> > > Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's proven
> > to be pretty reliable for me for close to a year.
> > >
> > > My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
> > > To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
> > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > >
> > > Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge process. It
> > provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the Apache
> > Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the
> > Apache master.
> > >
> > > The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2) run
> > the functional tests if doing a batch commit.
> > >
> > > Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of
> > >> the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an
> > absentee.
> > >>
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
> > >> To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
> > >> Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > >>
> > >> Bumping this thread up.
> > >>
> > >> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would
> > >> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
> > >>
> > >> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
> > >>
> > >> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
> > >>
> > >> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process
> > document.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> > >>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community,
> > >>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider
> > >>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give
> > >>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with all
> > >>> the perks that Github
> > >> provides.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you,
> > >>>
> > >>> Vlad
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>


Re: gitbox?

2018-04-17 Thread Parth Chandra
Hi Drill devs

  If no one has any objections I will open the Apache infra request to move
to gitbox. Once this is setup, committers will be able to merge/commit
without ever leaving github.

Thanks

Parth

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com> wrote:

> My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via
> Google and mostly client related results came up.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:uw...@xhochy.com]
> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM
> To: dev@drill.apache.org
> Subject: Re: gitbox?
>
> Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git services
> https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.
>
> We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend switching to
> any other Apache project as soon as possible.
>
> Uwe
>
> > Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>:
> >
> > Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's proven
> to be pretty reliable for me for close to a year.
> >
> > My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
> > To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> >
> > Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge process. It
> provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the Apache
> Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the
> Apache master.
> >
> > The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2) run
> the functional tests if doing a batch commit.
> >
> > Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of
> >> the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an
> absentee.
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
> >> To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
> >> Subject: Re: gitbox?
> >>
> >> Bumping this thread up.
> >>
> >> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would
> >> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
> >>
> >> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
> >>
> >> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
> >>
> >> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process
> document.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> >>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community,
> >>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider
> >>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give
> >>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with all
> >>> the perks that Github
> >> provides.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >>>
> >>> Vlad
> >>>
> >>
>


RE: gitbox?

2017-11-12 Thread Kunal Khatua
My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via Google and 
mostly client related results came up. 

Thanks!

-Original Message-
From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:uw...@xhochy.com] 
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM
To: dev@drill.apache.org
Subject: Re: gitbox?

Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git services 
https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.

We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend switching to any 
other Apache project as soon as possible.

Uwe

> Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>:
> 
> Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's proven to be 
> pretty reliable for me for close to a year. 
> 
> My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
> To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: gitbox?
> 
> Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge process. It 
> provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the Apache Drill 
> mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the Apache master.
> 
> The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2) run the 
> functional tests if doing a batch commit.
> 
> Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.
> 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com> wrote:
>> 
>> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of 
>> the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an absentee.
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
>> To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: gitbox?
>> 
>> Bumping this thread up.
>> 
>> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would 
>> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
>> 
>> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
>> 
>> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
>> 
>> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process document.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
>>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community, 
>>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider 
>>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give 
>>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with all 
>>> the perks that Github
>> provides.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> 
>>> Vlad
>>> 
>> 


Re: gitbox?

2017-11-12 Thread Uwe L. Korn
Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git services 
https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.

We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend switching to any 
other Apache project as soon as possible.

Uwe

> Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com>:
> 
> Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's proven to be 
> pretty reliable for me for close to a year. 
> 
> My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
> To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: gitbox?
> 
> Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge process. It 
> provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the Apache Drill 
> mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the Apache master.
> 
> The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2) run the 
> functional tests if doing a batch commit.
> 
> Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.
> 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com> wrote:
>> 
>> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of the 
>> meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an absentee.
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
>> To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: gitbox?
>> 
>> Bumping this thread up.
>> 
>> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would 
>> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
>> 
>> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
>> 
>> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
>> 
>> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process document.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
>>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community, 
>>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider 
>>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give 
>>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with all 
>>> the perks that Github
>> provides.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> 
>>> Vlad
>>> 
>> 


RE: gitbox?

2017-11-12 Thread Kunal Khatua
Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's proven to be 
pretty reliable for me for close to a year. 

My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.

-Original Message-
From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
Subject: Re: gitbox?

Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge process. It 
provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the Apache Drill 
mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the Apache master.

The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2) run the 
functional tests if doing a batch commit.

Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.



On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com> wrote:

> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of the 
> meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an absentee.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
> To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: gitbox?
>
> Bumping this thread up.
>
> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would 
> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
>
> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
>
> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
>
> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process document.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> > https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community, 
> > but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider 
> > migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give 
> > committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with all 
> > the perks that Github
> provides.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Vlad
> >
>


Re: gitbox?

2017-11-11 Thread Abhishek Girish
+1

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Arina Yelchiyeva  wrote:

> +1 but as we have communicated on Hangouts committer should be responsible
> for:
>
> 1. making sure that there is only one commit (otherwise ask developer to
> squash the commits, unless several commits are required) and commit message
> is according to the Drill standards.
> 2. all unit tests pass.
> 3. all functional and advanced tests pass (
> https://github.com/mapr/drill-test-framework).
>
> Kind regards
> Arina
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Charles Givre  wrote:
>
> > I’d vote +1 for moving to gitbox.
> > — C
> >
> > > On Oct 31, 2017, at 13:54, Parth Chandra  wrote:
> > >
> > > Bumping this thread up.
> > >
> > > Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would
> > like
> > > to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
> > >
> > > Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
> > >
> > > I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
> > >
> > > Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process
> > document.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov  wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> > >> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community,
> but
> > >> from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider migrating
> > >> Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give committers write
> > access
> > >> to the Drill repository on Github with all the perks that Github
> > provides.
> > >>
> > >> Thank you,
> > >>
> > >> Vlad
> > >>
> >
> >
>


Re: gitbox?

2017-11-01 Thread Arina Yelchiyeva
+1 but as we have communicated on Hangouts committer should be responsible
for:

1. making sure that there is only one commit (otherwise ask developer to
squash the commits, unless several commits are required) and commit message
is according to the Drill standards.
2. all unit tests pass.
3. all functional and advanced tests pass (
https://github.com/mapr/drill-test-framework).

Kind regards
Arina

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Charles Givre  wrote:

> I’d vote +1 for moving to gitbox.
> — C
>
> > On Oct 31, 2017, at 13:54, Parth Chandra  wrote:
> >
> > Bumping this thread up.
> >
> > Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would
> like
> > to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
> >
> > Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
> >
> > I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
> >
> > Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process
> document.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> >> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community, but
> >> from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider migrating
> >> Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give committers write
> access
> >> to the Drill repository on Github with all the perks that Github
> provides.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >>
> >> Vlad
> >>
>
>


Re: gitbox?

2017-10-31 Thread Charles Givre
I’d vote +1 for moving to gitbox.
— C

> On Oct 31, 2017, at 13:54, Parth Chandra  wrote:
> 
> Bumping this thread up.
> 
> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would like
> to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
> 
> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
> 
> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
> 
> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process document.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov  wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community, but
>> from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider migrating
>> Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give committers write access
>> to the Drill repository on Github with all the perks that Github provides.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Vlad
>> 



Re: gitbox?

2017-10-31 Thread Parth Chandra
Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge process. It
provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the Apache
Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the
Apache master.

The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2) run the
functional tests if doing a batch commit.

Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.



On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com> wrote:

> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of the
> meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an absentee.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
> To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: gitbox?
>
> Bumping this thread up.
>
> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would like
> to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
>
> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
>
> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
>
> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process document.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> > https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community, but
> > from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider migrating
> > Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give committers write
> > access to the Drill repository on Github with all the perks that Github
> provides.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Vlad
> >
>


RE: gitbox?

2017-10-31 Thread Kunal Khatua
For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of the meeting? 
Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an absentee.

-Original Message-
From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org>
Subject: Re: gitbox?

Bumping this thread up.

Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would like to 
move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!

Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.

I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.

Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process document.



On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community, but 
> from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider migrating 
> Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give committers write 
> access to the Drill repository on Github with all the perks that Github 
> provides.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Vlad
>


Re: gitbox?

2017-10-31 Thread Parth Chandra
Bumping this thread up.

Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would like
to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!

Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.

I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.

Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process document.



On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community, but
> from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider migrating
> Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give committers write access
> to the Drill repository on Github with all the perks that Github provides.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Vlad
>