Re: Fineract Board Report for November

2016-10-31 Thread Ross Gardler
+1 (not conditional on another release)

The legal issues are addressed. The community is healthy. That's all we require 
for graduation.

Ross

---
Twitter: @rgardler


From: Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:42:00 AM
To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fineract Board Report for November

Sounds like a plan to me :)

> On Oct 30, 2016, at 7:30 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> Thx for the report!
>>
>> I would like to raise the possibility of calling for Graduation
>> of Fineract. What does everyone think?
>
> Personally I think having one more clean release would make me feel
> more comfortable about casting a +1 graduation vote. Also, sine I remember
> this community wanted to produce binary convenience artifacts at some
> point, I'd like to see that happen first.
>
> All in all: -0.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.



Re: Fineract Board Report for November

2016-10-31 Thread Jim Jagielski
Sounds like a plan to me :)

> On Oct 30, 2016, at 7:30 PM, Roman Shaposhnik  wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> Thx for the report!
>> 
>> I would like to raise the possibility of calling for Graduation
>> of Fineract. What does everyone think?
> 
> Personally I think having one more clean release would make me feel
> more comfortable about casting a +1 graduation vote. Also, sine I remember
> this community wanted to produce binary convenience artifacts at some
> point, I'd like to see that happen first.
> 
> All in all: -0.
> 
> Thanks,
> Roman.



Re: Fineract Board Report for November

2016-10-30 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Ed Cable  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've started the Board Report for November:
>
> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/2016-11+November+Report
> *
>
> Adi will be adding in technical details regarding the release and OpenJPA
> integration. Please review and add any comments/additions that you may
> have. The report is due on November 2 so I will be submitting it at the end
> of my work day on November 1 (PDT)

LGTM!

Thanks,
Roman.


Re: Fineract Board Report for November

2016-10-30 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> Thx for the report!
>
> I would like to raise the possibility of calling for Graduation
> of Fineract. What does everyone think?

Personally I think having one more clean release would make me feel
more comfortable about casting a +1 graduation vote. Also, sine I remember
this community wanted to produce binary convenience artifacts at some
point, I'd like to see that happen first.

All in all: -0.

Thanks,
Roman.


RE: Fineract Board Report for November

2016-10-27 Thread Markus Geiß
+1

-Original Message-
From: Adi Raju [mailto:adi.r...@confluxtechnologies.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 02:58 AM
To: dev <dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Fineract Board Report for November

+1

On 27-Oct-2016 11:59 PM, "Jim Jagielski" <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:

> It's not only the release but also the general way in which things are 
> progressing...
>
> > On Oct 27, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Myrle Krantz <mkra...@mifos.org> wrote:
> >
> > I think that would be great! This is my +1.
> >
> > I'm surprised that we would propose this after just one release though.
> Is that within the expected range?
> >
> > Greets,
> > Myrle
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On 27 Oct 2016, at 19:27, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thx for the report!
> >>
> >> I would like to raise the possibility of calling for Graduation of 
> >> Fineract. What does everyone think?
> >>
> >>> On Oct 27, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Ed Cable <edca...@mifos.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I've started the Board Report for November:
> >>>
> >>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/
> 2016-11+November+Report
> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/
> 2016-11+November+Report>*
> >>>
> >>> Adi will be adding in technical details regarding the release and
> OpenJPA
> >>> integration. Please review and add any comments/additions that you 
> >>> may have. The report is due on November 2 so I will be submitting 
> >>> it at
> the end
> >>> of my work day on November 1 (PDT)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Ed
> >>
>
>


Re: Fineract Board Report for November

2016-10-27 Thread Adi Raju
+1

On 27-Oct-2016 11:59 PM, "Jim Jagielski"  wrote:

> It's not only the release but also the general way in which things
> are progressing...
>
> > On Oct 27, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Myrle Krantz  wrote:
> >
> > I think that would be great! This is my +1.
> >
> > I'm surprised that we would propose this after just one release though.
> Is that within the expected range?
> >
> > Greets,
> > Myrle
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On 27 Oct 2016, at 19:27, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >>
> >> Thx for the report!
> >>
> >> I would like to raise the possibility of calling for Graduation
> >> of Fineract. What does everyone think?
> >>
> >>> On Oct 27, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I've started the Board Report for November:
> >>>
> >>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/
> 2016-11+November+Report
> >>>  2016-11+November+Report>*
> >>>
> >>> Adi will be adding in technical details regarding the release and
> OpenJPA
> >>> integration. Please review and add any comments/additions that you may
> >>> have. The report is due on November 2 so I will be submitting it at
> the end
> >>> of my work day on November 1 (PDT)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Ed
> >>
>
>


Re: Fineract Board Report for November

2016-10-27 Thread Myrle Krantz
I think that would be great! This is my +1.

I'm surprised that we would propose this after just one release though. Is that 
within the expected range?

Greets,
Myrle 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 27 Oct 2016, at 19:27, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> Thx for the report!
> 
> I would like to raise the possibility of calling for Graduation
> of Fineract. What does everyone think?
> 
>> On Oct 27, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I've started the Board Report for November:
>> 
>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/2016-11+November+Report
>> *
>> 
>> Adi will be adding in technical details regarding the release and OpenJPA
>> integration. Please review and add any comments/additions that you may
>> have. The report is due on November 2 so I will be submitting it at the end
>> of my work day on November 1 (PDT)
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Ed
> 


Re: Fineract Board Report for November

2016-10-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
Thx for the report!

I would like to raise the possibility of calling for Graduation
of Fineract. What does everyone think?

> On Oct 27, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I've started the Board Report for November:
> 
> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/2016-11+November+Report
> *
> 
> Adi will be adding in technical details regarding the release and OpenJPA
> integration. Please review and add any comments/additions that you may
> have. The report is due on November 2 so I will be submitting it at the end
> of my work day on November 1 (PDT)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ed



Fineract Board Report for November

2016-10-27 Thread Ed Cable
Hi all,

I've started the Board Report for November:

*https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/2016-11+November+Report
*

Adi will be adding in technical details regarding the release and OpenJPA
integration. Please review and add any comments/additions that you may
have. The report is due on November 2 so I will be submitting it at the end
of my work day on November 1 (PDT)

Thanks,

Ed