Re: mxmlc target fails with jdk 1.8.0_291x64

[Alex Harui]

Hi Andrew,

Can you repro?  If you can get it In the debugger there will probably be more 
info.

I think these are the release notes for JDK 1.8.0_291
https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/javase/8u291-relnotes.html

If I'm reading that right, lots of interesting changes in that release, like 
changes to TLS support, so maybe 291 can break something.

-Alex

On 7/10/23, 9:58 AM, "Frost, Andrew" mailto:andrew.fr...@harman.com.inva>LID> wrote:


EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.




Hi all


We have a customer with an odd issue and I wanted to check if anyone had found 
something similar already…


The odd part about this is that it works fine with Java 1.8.0 build 201 but 
fails with Java 1.8.0 build 291, both of them 64-bit.


The error is just when compiling an MXML file using Flex:




Loading configuration file C:\FlexSDK\frameworks\flex-config.xml


Error: null


We have managed to narrow it down to the use of CFF:


@font-face {


src: url("Roboto-Regular.ttf");


fontFamily: Roboto;


embedAsCFF: true;


}
Change the “true” to “false” and it compiles fine…




In terms of version:


>amxmlc.bat -version
Version 4.6.0 build 23201
Although they’ve also tried with 4.16.1, adding in the old jar files using “ant 
thirdparty-downloads” which apparently still works.


My thinking was that there’s an odd dependency upon the Adobe font embedding 
library, but I have never come across it working with one version of Java 1.8 
and failing with another version of 1.8…. (and of course anything later also 
fails so they can’t just update to Java 11 or 17..)




Does anyone have any hints or seen this sort of thing before?




Many thanks


Andrew

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex BlazeDS 4.8.0 Released!

[Alex Harui]

Awesome!  Congratulations!

On 4/17/23, 2:02 PM, "Josh Tynjala" mailto:joshtynj...@apache.org>> wrote:


EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.




The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex
Blaze DS 4.8.0


Apache Flex BlazeDS is the server-based Java remoting and web messaging
technology that enables developers to easily connect to back-end
distributed data and push data in real-time to Apache Flex, Apache Royale,
and Adobe AIR™ applications for more responsive rich Internet application
(RIA) experiences.


The Apache Flex Blaze DS 4.8.0 is an update to upgrade dependencies and
make general improvements, including the introduction of a binary
distribution.


For more details, see the release notes at:
https://www.apache.org/dist/flex/BlazeDS/4.8.0/RELEASE_NOTES 



Apache Flex Blaze DS is available in source and binary forms from the
following download page:
https://flex.apache.org/download-blazeds.html 



When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify the
downloads using signatures or SHA512 hashes.


For more information on Apache Flex Blaze DS, visit the project home page:
http://flex.apache.org/ 


Thank you for using Apache Flex Blaze DS,


The Apache Flex Community

Re: How To Debug Flash Apps on Packaged Browser

[Alex Harui]

IIRC, the SWF needs to have been built for debugging.  The browser may also 
need to have a debugger version of FlashPlayer installed.

If the SWF does not use ExternalInterface, you can sometimes connect FDB 
without a debugger player by having FDB launch the SWF w/o its HTML wrapper.  
That changes the security model though, so doesn't always work.

On 12/26/21, 3:46 AM, "Yishay Weiss"  wrote:

Hi,

I am trying to connect fdb to a client's packaged browser. I tried simply 
calling run and launching the browser but no success. Any ideas?

Thanks
Yishay

Re: CMS Migration for Flex

[Alex Harui]

Thanks for working on this Dave!

-Alex

On 6/9/21, 11:32 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:

As you may recall the Apache CMS has been deprecated for over five years 
now and will be decommissioned
by July 31, 2021.

I’ve been tasked with moving OpenWebBeans's website away from the Apache 
CMS.
I will migrate your website to a Pelican build with GitHub Flavored 
Markdown (GFM).
For your reference the already migrated www-site is here 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fwww-site%2Fdata=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0899ec288d52434074a608d92b74ce48%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637588603544156091%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000sdata=Lj%2F1L6vI9aqYGqRDH9NC9lW6YNJl8SAJx0kH2NBzvNI%3Dreserved=0

The following will occur.
- flex-site git repository is already a mirror of the CMS content. We’ll 
create a main branch.
- CMS mdtext and Cmspage files are converted to md and stored in the 
content tree.
- Page templates will be converted essentially as is with some minor 
improvements.
- HTML files (apidocs) built separately are copied into the content tree. 

The Apache CMS had a cumbersome process of individual checkouts -> staging 
-> publishing.
The new branching strategy is as follows:
- main will have the site content sources and any additional docs (like api 
docs).
- asf-site will have the production website which is automatically deployed 
to flex.apache.org.
During the migration we will deploy to flex.staged.apache.org
- preview/release will have the website prepared for the next release. You 
will add release specific docs to this branch
- preview/release-staging will have the built preview website which is 
automatically deployed to flex-release.staged.apache.org

This new plan allows for a redesign of your site without danger of 
premature deployment.
If you decide that GFM is not for flex then you can switch to a different 
process within a preview branch.

Release steps for the website could be:
- Branch main as preview/release
- Make your updates to preview/release
- Confirm your changes on flex-release.staged.apache.org
- Pull your changes from preview/release to main. flex.apache.org is 
automatically updated.

All The Best,
Dave Fisher

Re: App crash

[Alex Harui]

Is there a stack dump or does the app just disappear?  Post stack dumps.  If 
the app disappears check memory usage.

-Alex

On 4/6/21, 8:36 AM, "inkong"  wrote:

Hi,

I'm just trying to throw out this issue but I'm not sure if you guys have
been experiencing also. Currently I upgraded our app to sdk 4.16.0 from
apache flex. After that upgrade we have been experiencing crash mostly in
Windows. It's really hard to debug where the issue is and why it's
happening. The crash is not replicable in the same place. It can happen
anywhere in the application. Maybe you guys have any idea or someone is also
experiencing the same. Help is really much appreciated. Thank you. 



--
Sent from: 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdc623209230c46abc8a208d8f911acd2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637533201601089205%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000sdata=vBPFKMF9P%2F%2BZ1tZ07rqPomglXbcI7B%2BVRlPfKTWRhRg%3Dreserved=0

Re: Using Fdb

[Alex Harui]

It is working for me on java version "1.8.0_201"

On 12/14/20, 3:46 AM, "Yishay Weiss"  wrote:

When I try running fdb I get the following message:

C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Flash Builder 4.7 (64 
Bit)\sdks\4.6.0\bin>fdb.exe
Error loading: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_261\jre\bin\server\jvm.dll

Does it only run with java 7?

Any help appreciated.

Yishay

Re: Flex Website -- next steps

[Alex Harui]

I have not paid attention to how publishing site files has changed (if at all), 
but also consider this thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd574c6d14e3174d237008f04ac27b54513ca6ec9fcb012dc7801978c%40%3Cusers.flex.apache.org%3E

-Alex

On 11/13/20, 2:57 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

If no one knows. I will contact infra on Monday/Tuesday

pt., 13 lis 2020 o 11:43 Piotr Zarzycki 
napisał(a):

> Hi Guys,
>
> Does that mean that our website won't work anymore ? If I push something
> new it won't work  ? Can someone shed some light on it ?
>
> I have pushed MD5 update for playerglobal.swc which should help get up
> installer on feet but I don't see changes yet.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> niedz., 20 wrz 2020 o 12:23 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
>> Great Nicholas
>> thanks!
>>
>> El dom., 20 sept. 2020 a las 0:41, Nicholas Kwiatkowski (<
>> nicholaskwiatkow...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>>
>> > Since I haven't seen any -1's or other negative comments, I'll get
>> working
>> > down this path.
>> >
>> > -Nick
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:52 AM Olaf Krueger 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1 Thank you for working on this!!
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Sent from: 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd53d617ed2b246a0bfe408d887c2ea45%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637408618508473972%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000sdata=tRUdCl%2BDMlT7yxD5SOg7RAtO1Hzf4P%2F3RrhJiWJIf2E%3Dreserved=0
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd53d617ed2b246a0bfe408d887c2ea45%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637408618508483966%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000sdata=bYPx0gaaOyrognIoaoElG4GoEwACbmoY7pltlnVkW1k%3Dreserved=0
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Re: Board report time (June 2020)

[Alex Harui]

Hi Paul,

I see that someone else from your domain is subscribed to this list.  I will 
send a direct email to that other email address and if you get it then we will 
know and can unsubscribe that other email.

HTH,
-Alex

On 6/9/20, 5:16 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi Paul,

Here is the instruction how to unsubscribe from mailing list [1]

[1] 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Fcommunity-mailinglists.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce679ddf3cf914c7bf7e408d80c6ee19c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637273017655074562sdata=UfbRWnpk09O0%2BnCoODBVqJsGtzapnEyziy8biNfOfyw%3Dreserved=0

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 9 cze 2020 o 14:13 Paul Dandurand 
napisał(a):

> Hi Olaf,
>
> I’ve been getting these Flex emails probably from a past employee email
> being forwarded to me. Would happen to know who to contact to have our
> company emails removed from the apache-flex-development list?
>
> Thanks for any tips.
>
> Paul
>
> > On Jun 9, 2020, at 2:58 AM, Olaf Krueger  wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Leo!
> > I just updated the report and will send it now!
> >
> > Olaf
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from: 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce679ddf3cf914c7bf7e408d80c6ee19c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637273017655074562sdata=EYxhYebCBxS84eIlOHaQneZCTedYsX7BCeit0rboOQw%3Dreserved=0
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce679ddf3cf914c7bf7e408d80c6ee19c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637273017655074562sdata=Gtk0ozSv1Ks9KJwYU3hY7EGjMb5E%2F87Ge%2F8V%2BAN4U9Q%3Dreserved=0

*

Re: MXRoyale question - styleName

[Alex Harui]

ned to you previously, so I know you are aware of it. I know at
>> least
>> for certain browsers that es6 Proxy is very performant in spite of it
>> being
>> a 'Proxy' approach. I am not thinking about this for now, but really 
I
>> think IE11 is the only thing holding us back there. I personally
>> would like
>> to see us let go of IE11 asap after 1.0 - the more it continues to be
>> supported, the more it lingers and I do think we should look forward
>> more
>> rather than back. I think if people want to keep using old IE 
browsers
>> internally with its risks etc, then they could probably keep using
    >> IE10
>> just for swf apps (iirc IE10 probably won't, but IE11 will get the
>> maintenance update that removes flash player at the end of the
>> year if
>> IE11 did not, then I can't understand why we would continue to
>> support it
>> for Royale, IMO, it is just holding us back).
>>
>> anyway... that's off topic. For another time
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 6:37 PM Alex Harui 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Assuming you meant add/remove from classList as you proposed in the
>> first
>> > post, then I think the answer is yes.  I think that's simple enough
>> to
>> > emulate and will work most of the time.  I think you have to use
>> classList
>> > instead of className because there will be other things in the
>> classList.
>> >
>> > For MXRoyale/SparkRoyale we are trying to have people change their
>> code as
>> > little as possible.  We are not trying to set them up for the
>> future.  IMO,
>> > if the migrator is willing to change a lot of code then Jewel or
>> Basic
>> > should be considered.
>> >
>> > CSS is already funky in MXRoyale/SparkRoyale.  Flex supported style
>> > properties that don't exist in the browser (like gap and
>> horizontalCenter,
>> > IIRC) and width=100% has a completely different meaning.  The
>> emulation
>> > will eventually watch for certain styles and decide whether to
>> emulate it
>> > in browser CSS or never set it in the browser and store the values
>> > elsewhere for use by getStyle calls from other code.  The layouts
>> do the
>> > latter in most cases.  PercentWidth is never set on the
>> HTMLElement.  The
>> > old Flex layout code runs and interprets it.
>> >
>> > In the end, it should be a collaborative effort for the migrating
>> team and
>> > the framework team.  Time is running out on 2020 so the main
>> question is
>> > what will get someone migrated faster?  Emulation is usually faster
>> and
>> > safer than changing code paths in many places in the application
>> and helps
>> > others trying to use the emulations.  But some emulations (runtime
>> property
>> > access) are too hard or slow so the application does need to be
>> changed.
>> >
>> > HTH,
>> > -Alex
>> >
    >> > On 5/6/20, 11:08 PM, "Greg Dove"  wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks Alex, but - as a follow-on, do you think the styleName
>> setter
>> > should
>> > set the className if it has a string value assignment? Or
>> should we be
>> > telling people to manually edit the code/mxml and swap
>> styleName string
>> > value assignments to 'className' value assignments? I think for
>> the
>> > majority of cases (which I think will be string values), it
>> might be
>> > good
>> > to have it 'work by default' and we can add the warnings for
>> > non-strings,
>> > like you suggest, but I just wanted to be sure that it is
>> better to
>> > 'emulate' than to force review/attention
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 5:03 PM Alex Harui
>> 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Without thinking too

Re: MXRoyale question - styleName

[Alex Harui]

Most components work for the scenarios we've seen.   So if we've only seen 
GridRow used with a height set, it is not surprising it doesn't work without 
height set.  We reused a fair amount of code from Flex, but laying out elements 
is often different.

ADG has a working alternatingRowColors so hopefully you can move that down into 
DataGrid.

It's interesting that in the same month as someone wants modules to work in 
IE11 we also want to get rid of IE11 support.  Not sure what the right thing to 
do is.  I think we'd have to rewrite XML to use ES6 Proxy if we go that route 
since that's the other main runtime property access problem scenario.  Not sure 
if there are others.

-Alex

On 5/7/20, 2:09 AM, "Greg Dove"  wrote:

Assuming you meant add/remove from classList as you proposed in the first
post, then I think the answer is yes.

yes, that's what I really meant. Ok, I will add that to MXRoyale probably
tomorrow.

Other:
I do expect to be contributing more to MXRoyale over coming weeks/months -
such as mxDataGrid which still needs more work over time.
I also saw different behavior with GridItems inside GridRow recently when
there was no height set for example, it was not being set to full height by
default, so I will look into that at some point (I am often using
workarounds for issues, but noting them as needs attention in Royale - I
don't have time for logging issues for everything with repro at this point).
For styles, yeah I think I saw alternatingColors for datagrid in MXRoyale
is not correctly processed (I think it goes the browser which does not
understand it - and so ignores it).
I am working on a client project with similar justifications for choosing
emulation I know others are looking at emulation as well for the same
reasons.

For people who don't care about IE11, (and I actually had someone from my
client ask me 'why do we care about that?' recently with genuine surprise)
then es6 Proxy would support a lot of 'runtime' emulations I think, which I
mentioned to you previously, so I know you are aware of it. I know at least
for certain browsers that es6 Proxy is very performant in spite of it being
a 'Proxy' approach. I am not thinking about this for now, but really I
think IE11 is the only thing holding us back there. I personally would like
to see us let go of IE11 asap after 1.0 - the more it continues to be
supported, the more it lingers and I do think we should look forward more
rather than back. I think if people want to keep using old IE browsers
internally with its risks etc, then they could probably keep using IE10
just for swf apps (iirc IE10 probably won't, but IE11 will get the
maintenance update that removes flash player at the end of the year if
IE11 did not, then I can't understand why we would continue to support it
for Royale, IMO, it is just holding us back).

anyway... that's off topic. For another time



On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 6:37 PM Alex Harui  wrote:

> Assuming you meant add/remove from classList as you proposed in the first
> post, then I think the answer is yes.  I think that's simple enough to
> emulate and will work most of the time.  I think you have to use classList
> instead of className because there will be other things in the classList.
>
> For MXRoyale/SparkRoyale we are trying to have people change their code as
> little as possible.  We are not trying to set them up for the future.  
IMO,
> if the migrator is willing to change a lot of code then Jewel or Basic
> should be considered.
>
> CSS is already funky in MXRoyale/SparkRoyale.  Flex supported style
> properties that don't exist in the browser (like gap and horizontalCenter,
> IIRC) and width=100% has a completely different meaning.  The emulation
> will eventually watch for certain styles and decide whether to emulate it
> in browser CSS or never set it in the browser and store the values
> elsewhere for use by getStyle calls from other code.  The layouts do the
> latter in most cases.  PercentWidth is never set on the HTMLElement.  The
> old Flex layout code runs and interprets it.
>
> In the end, it should be a collaborative effort for the migrating team and
> the framework team.  Time is running out on 2020 so the main question is
> what will get someone migrated faster?  Emulation is usually faster and
> safer than changing code paths in many places in the application and helps
> others trying to use the emulations.  But some emulations (runtime 
property
> access) are too hard or slow so the application does need to be changed.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 5/6/20, 11:08 PM, "Greg Dove&q

Re: MXRoyale question - styleName

[Alex Harui]

Assuming you meant add/remove from classList as you proposed in the first post, 
then I think the answer is yes.  I think that's simple enough to emulate and 
will work most of the time.  I think you have to use classList instead of 
className because there will be other things in the classList.

For MXRoyale/SparkRoyale we are trying to have people change their code as 
little as possible.  We are not trying to set them up for the future.  IMO, if 
the migrator is willing to change a lot of code then Jewel or Basic should be 
considered.

CSS is already funky in MXRoyale/SparkRoyale.  Flex supported style properties 
that don't exist in the browser (like gap and horizontalCenter, IIRC) and 
width=100% has a completely different meaning.  The emulation will eventually 
watch for certain styles and decide whether to emulate it in browser CSS or 
never set it in the browser and store the values elsewhere for use by getStyle 
calls from other code.  The layouts do the latter in most cases.  PercentWidth 
is never set on the HTMLElement.  The old Flex layout code runs and interprets 
it.

In the end, it should be a collaborative effort for the migrating team and the 
framework team.  Time is running out on 2020 so the main question is what will 
get someone migrated faster?  Emulation is usually faster and safer than 
changing code paths in many places in the application and helps others trying 
to use the emulations.  But some emulations (runtime property access) are too 
hard or slow so the application does need to be changed.

HTH,
-Alex

On 5/6/20, 11:08 PM, "Greg Dove"  wrote:

Thanks Alex, but - as a follow-on, do you think the styleName setter should
set the className if it has a string value assignment? Or should we be
telling people to manually edit the code/mxml and swap styleName string
value assignments to 'className' value assignments? I think for the
majority of cases (which I think will be string values), it might be good
to have it 'work by default' and we can add the warnings for non-strings,
like you suggest, but I just wanted to be sure that it is better to
'emulate' than to force review/attention



On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 5:03 PM Alex Harui  wrote:

> Without thinking too hard, I would output a warning if someone passes
> something other than a string.  Then we'll know if anybody really needs 
the
> more complex cases and can figure out what to do about it then.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 5/6/20, 2:11 PM, "Greg Dove"  wrote:
>
> This question is mainly for Alex or anyone else involved in porting an
> MXRoyale application.
>
> When porting styleName='myStyleName' what is considered the best
> approach?
>
> I would have assumed that styleName could simply be added to the
> underlying
> element's classList if it is a string, so it (I assume) would
> correspond
> closely to how it was used in the original Flex app. But I know
> styleName
> is not always a string in Flex, but in my experience that seems to be
> the
> most frequent case, which relates to a named declaration in the
> stylesheet.
>
> Alex, and others, what are your thoughts? I am dealing with a large
> codebase and would like to use a consistent approach from the outset.
>
> At the moment we have;
>
> set styleName(value:Object /* String, CSSStyleDeclaration, or
> UIComponent
> */):void
> ...
>   // TODO
> trace("styleName not implemented");
>
> if it is a string, then I assume it could be considered as a
> custom/arbitrary css class, similar to how I remember it working in
> Flex.
>
> UIComponent seems more problematic I assume, but I have not thought 
too
> deeply about it.
>
> Anyway I would welcome thoughts. I guess one simple option is simply 
to
> change it to className when porting if it is a string. But for
> MXRoyale I
> wondered if this should work (if it can) without changes
>
>
>

Re: MXRoyale question - styleName

[Alex Harui]

Without thinking too hard, I would output a warning if someone passes something 
other than a string.  Then we'll know if anybody really needs the more complex 
cases and can figure out what to do about it then.

-Alex

On 5/6/20, 2:11 PM, "Greg Dove"  wrote:

This question is mainly for Alex or anyone else involved in porting an
MXRoyale application.

When porting styleName='myStyleName' what is considered the best approach?

I would have assumed that styleName could simply be added to the underlying
element's classList if it is a string, so it (I assume) would correspond
closely to how it was used in the original Flex app. But I know styleName
is not always a string in Flex, but in my experience that seems to be the
most frequent case, which relates to a named declaration in the stylesheet.

Alex, and others, what are your thoughts? I am dealing with a large
codebase and would like to use a consistent approach from the outset.

At the moment we have;

set styleName(value:Object /* String, CSSStyleDeclaration, or UIComponent
*/):void
...
  // TODO
trace("styleName not implemented");

if it is a string, then I assume it could be considered as a
custom/arbitrary css class, similar to how I remember it working in Flex.

UIComponent seems more problematic I assume, but I have not thought too
deeply about it.

Anyway I would welcome thoughts. I guess one simple option is simply to
change it to className when porting if it is a string. But for MXRoyale I
wondered if this should work (if it can) without changes

Re: [19/23] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-35328 - Update MDLExample with DataFieldProviderBead

[Alex Harui]

I couldn't easily tell if those differences are new features or fixed bugs. Bug 
fixes that all users of DateChooserModel will need should go in the Basic one.  
 Similarly, the change I made to Jewel's DateChooserModel to fix the build was 
a quick one.  I only added the missing property but didn't hook it up to 
anything as I don't know if there is Jewel has the same problem or not or can 
be refactored to leverage more code and the fix from the Basic one.

-Alex

On 1/31/20, 11:04 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:

About Jewel DateChooserModel, if you compare with Basic one will see that
has several more code, since implements a lot of things that was missed in
the Basic one.

El vie., 31 ene. 2020 a las 19:58, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi Alex,
>
> the problem is in dataProviderChangeHandler method
> Basic is adding styles just in case like this:
>
> var style:SimpleCSSStyles = new SimpleCSSStyles();
> style.marginBottom = presentationModel.separatorThickness;
> UIBase(ir).style = style;
>
> while Jewel tries to minimize (or remove at all) any set of styles and
> uses CSS
>
> As well
>
> UIBase(ir).percentWidth = 100;
>
> is removed too.
>
> another thing is
>
> dataGroup.addItemRenderer(ir, false);
>
> is executed at in other order in other place, I think I need to do that
> for some reason, but don't remember why
>
> For that reason, I was proposing to refactor to extend the basic one.
>
> What do you think?
>
> El vie., 31 ene. 2020 a las 18:09, Alex Harui ()
> escribió:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> The diff I ran didn't show anything obvious.   And as you noted in
>> another email, there is a copy of DateChooserModel in Jewel I didn't see
>> that I will fix shortly.
>>
>> Are we still concerned about re-use of Basic beads?  I thought all visual
>> CSS from Basic was moved to a Theme.  It may also be that we need to get
>> better at using interfaces (and the "has" pattern) and maybe more of 
these
>> beads and models can go in Core or maybe some other SWC.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 1/31/20, 4:01 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>> I've missed this email, sorry. I was comparing code and there's
>> various
>> changes most of all at the end of the file that are important for
>> Jewel,
>> I can try to make it extend the Basic Bead and see if that's possible
>> and
>> saves something
>>
>> El mié., 29 ene. 2020 a las 20:48, Alex Harui
>> ()
>> escribió:
>>
>> > @Carlos,
>> >
>> > While we're on the subject, it appears that Jewel has an actual
>> copy of,
>> > for example, Basic's DataItemRendererFactoryForArrayData.  What is
>> the
>> > rationale for that?  Is there some subtle difference I'm not seeing
>> or can
>> > we get rid of the duplicate copy?
>> >
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> > On 1/29/20, 8:46 AM, "Carlos Rovira" 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > It's ok to change it if other changes done this past months
>> make MDL
>> > DDL
>> > continue to work
>> > Maybe others are using it since is a full working set and we
>> should
>> > ensure
>> > it continue to work
>> > thanks
>> >
>> > El mié., 29 ene. 2020 a las 15:56, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> >
>> > > Hi Alex,
>> > >
>> > > I remember that DropDownl list was lack of dataField 
actually.
>> > Instead of
>> > > adding it trough property - I have created Bead which
>> provides that
>> > > feature. Whether it's needed now or not is actually something
>> I have
>> > no
>> > > idea about. I'm ok with removing it.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > wt., 28 sty 2020 o 20:55 Alex Harui 
>> napisał(a):
>> > >
>> > > > Ran into this while doing the has/is refactor.
>>

Re: [19/23] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-35328 - Update MDLExample with DataFieldProviderBead

[Alex Harui]

I think in the refactor I'm working on it will be easier for Jewel to use the 
Basic one and alter those few things.
-Alex

On 1/31/20, 10:59 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:

Hi Alex,

the problem is in dataProviderChangeHandler method
Basic is adding styles just in case like this:

var style:SimpleCSSStyles = new SimpleCSSStyles();
style.marginBottom = presentationModel.separatorThickness;
UIBase(ir).style = style;

while Jewel tries to minimize (or remove at all) any set of styles and uses
CSS

As well

UIBase(ir).percentWidth = 100;

is removed too.

another thing is

dataGroup.addItemRenderer(ir, false);

is executed at in other order in other place, I think I need to do that for
some reason, but don't remember why

For that reason, I was proposing to refactor to extend the basic one.

What do you think?

El vie., 31 ene. 2020 a las 18:09, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> Hi Carlos,
>
> The diff I ran didn't show anything obvious.   And as you noted in another
> email, there is a copy of DateChooserModel in Jewel I didn't see that I
> will fix shortly.
>
> Are we still concerned about re-use of Basic beads?  I thought all visual
> CSS from Basic was moved to a Theme.  It may also be that we need to get
> better at using interfaces (and the "has" pattern) and maybe more of these
> beads and models can go in Core or maybe some other SWC.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 1/31/20, 4:01 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
> I've missed this email, sorry. I was comparing code and there's 
various
> changes most of all at the end of the file that are important for
> Jewel,
> I can try to make it extend the Basic Bead and see if that's possible
    > and
> saves something
>
> El mié., 29 ene. 2020 a las 20:48, Alex Harui
> ()
> escribió:
>
> > @Carlos,
> >
> > While we're on the subject, it appears that Jewel has an actual copy
> of,
> > for example, Basic's DataItemRendererFactoryForArrayData.  What is
> the
> > rationale for that?  Is there some subtle difference I'm not seeing
> or can
> > we get rid of the duplicate copy?
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 1/29/20, 8:46 AM, "Carlos Rovira" 
> wrote:
> >
> > It's ok to change it if other changes done this past months make
> MDL
> > DDL
> > continue to work
> > Maybe others are using it since is a full working set and we
> should
> > ensure
> > it continue to work
> > thanks
> >
> > El mié., 29 ene. 2020 a las 15:56, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > I remember that DropDownl list was lack of dataField actually.
> > Instead of
> > > adding it trough property - I have created Bead which provides
> that
> > > feature. Whether it's needed now or not is actually something
> I have
> > no
> > > idea about. I'm ok with removing it.
> > >
> > >
> > > wt., 28 sty 2020 o 20:55 Alex Harui 
> napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Ran into this while doing the has/is refactor.
> > > >
> > > > In what ways is this different than the labelField in
> > IDataProviderModel?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 6/29/17, 12:22 PM, "pio...@apache.org"  >
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > FLEX-35328 - Update MDLExample with 
DataFieldProviderBead
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Project:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Frepodata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca6a4c75b230049f80b4e08d7a67fac93%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637160939597048112sdata=i3HkbrgC70ldpEK9Iz10gR3uqx7c6YtART2MztgHUDk%3Dreserved=0
> >   

Re: [19/23] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-35328 - Update MDLExample with DataFieldProviderBead

[Alex Harui]

Hi Carlos,

The diff I ran didn't show anything obvious.   And as you noted in another 
email, there is a copy of DateChooserModel in Jewel I didn't see that I will 
fix shortly.

Are we still concerned about re-use of Basic beads?  I thought all visual CSS 
from Basic was moved to a Theme.  It may also be that we need to get better at 
using interfaces (and the "has" pattern) and maybe more of these beads and 
models can go in Core or maybe some other SWC.

-Alex

On 1/31/20, 4:01 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:

Hi Alex,
I've missed this email, sorry. I was comparing code and there's various
changes most of all at the end of the file that are important for Jewel,
I can try to make it extend the Basic Bead and see if that's possible and
saves something

El mié., 29 ene. 2020 a las 20:48, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> @Carlos,
>
> While we're on the subject, it appears that Jewel has an actual copy of,
> for example, Basic's DataItemRendererFactoryForArrayData.  What is the
> rationale for that?  Is there some subtle difference I'm not seeing or can
> we get rid of the duplicate copy?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 1/29/20, 8:46 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> It's ok to change it if other changes done this past months make MDL
> DDL
> continue to work
> Maybe others are using it since is a full working set and we should
> ensure
> it continue to work
> thanks
>
> El mié., 29 ene. 2020 a las 15:56, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > I remember that DropDownl list was lack of dataField actually.
> Instead of
> > adding it trough property - I have created Bead which provides that
> > feature. Whether it's needed now or not is actually something I have
> no
> > idea about. I'm ok with removing it.
> >
> >
> > wt., 28 sty 2020 o 20:55 Alex Harui  napisał(a):
> >
> > > Ran into this while doing the has/is refactor.
> > >
> > > In what ways is this different than the labelField in
> IDataProviderModel?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 6/29/17, 12:22 PM, "pio...@apache.org" 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > FLEX-35328 - Update MDLExample with DataFieldProviderBead
> > >
> > >
> > > Project:
> > >
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Frepodata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C592a604967864eb0e11708d7a64546e5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637160688786949461sdata=vbGoXe2ruxsudriJpxXTOUi64NZYYMZzME7PrlQ70Mk%3Dreserved=0
> > > Commit:
> > >
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Fcommit%2Fc706278edata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C592a604967864eb0e11708d7a64546e5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637160688786959455sdata=uU6V1zehpZ8B7XwhmYuwrn1HxUHDIK%2Fs09xK3CMfXSg%3Dreserved=0
> > > Tree:
> > >
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Ftree%2Fc706278edata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C592a604967864eb0e11708d7a64546e5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637160688786959455sdata=sQlfHhZSf8uCAklIBZqeFS0wmFBTg9nvz%2BAReCZ2MLc%3Dreserved=0
> > > Diff:
> > >
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Fdiff%2Fc706278edata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C592a604967864eb0e11708d7a64546e5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637160688786959455sdata=7DBx1rxkufMwiJzNn9Xa5jFSpuzd0D8tX7eHTjlShqw%3Dreserved=0
> > >
> > > Branch: refs/heads/develop
> > > Commit: c706278ed1fe5d7ab5e763c572b3d97f16077a80
> > > Parents: eaa33ea
> > > Author: piotrz 
> > > Authored: Sun Jun 25 19:27:09 2017 +0200
> > > Committer: piotrz 
> > > Committed: Sun Jun 25 19:27:09 2017 +0200
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
> > 

Re: [19/23] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-35328 - Update MDLExample with DataFieldProviderBead

[Alex Harui]

@Carlos,
 
While we're on the subject, it appears that Jewel has an actual copy of, for 
example, Basic's DataItemRendererFactoryForArrayData.  What is the rationale 
for that?  Is there some subtle difference I'm not seeing or can we get rid of 
the duplicate copy?

-Alex

On 1/29/20, 8:46 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:

It's ok to change it if other changes done this past months make MDL DDL
continue to work
Maybe others are using it since is a full working set and we should ensure
it continue to work
thanks

El mié., 29 ene. 2020 a las 15:56, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi Alex,
>
> I remember that DropDownl list was lack of dataField actually. Instead of
> adding it trough property - I have created Bead which provides that
> feature. Whether it's needed now or not is actually something I have no
> idea about. I'm ok with removing it.
>
>
    > wt., 28 sty 2020 o 20:55 Alex Harui  napisał(a):
>
> > Ran into this while doing the has/is refactor.
> >
> > In what ways is this different than the labelField in 
IDataProviderModel?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 6/29/17, 12:22 PM, "pio...@apache.org"  wrote:
> >
> > FLEX-35328 - Update MDLExample with DataFieldProviderBead
> >
> >
> > Project:
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Frepodata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C90cd166f2afe4db321f408d7a4dad9b7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637159132175331931sdata=o8vCSEU8b3I95JDWtA2Cwp%2FKxzCizNP4ozJVYigIPeA%3Dreserved=0
> > Commit:
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Fcommit%2Fc706278edata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C90cd166f2afe4db321f408d7a4dad9b7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637159132175331931sdata=aRtlOlZBqgPbmYDnWKCudbvgGQ%2BiTT3SXfSwlcZOfTU%3Dreserved=0
> > Tree:
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Ftree%2Fc706278edata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C90cd166f2afe4db321f408d7a4dad9b7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637159132175331931sdata=rOgVJyXLul7KmWwekXkQ5fybxByoTXtDzz%2B%2BcRcM47c%3Dreserved=0
> > Diff:
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Fdiff%2Fc706278edata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C90cd166f2afe4db321f408d7a4dad9b7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637159132175341924sdata=vKp2yoZLcsqigRsNKO46lbwYY3339EXXokY8V7VtMRM%3Dreserved=0
> >
> > Branch: refs/heads/develop
> > Commit: c706278ed1fe5d7ab5e763c572b3d97f16077a80
> > Parents: eaa33ea
> > Author: piotrz 
> > Authored: Sun Jun 25 19:27:09 2017 +0200
> > Committer: piotrz 
> > Committed: Sun Jun 25 19:27:09 2017 +0200
> >
> >
>  --
> >  examples/flexjs/MDLExample/src/main/flex/DropDownList.mxml | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
>  --
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Fblob%2Fc706278e%2Fexamples%2Fflexjs%2FMDLExample%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fflex%2FDropDownList.mxmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C90cd166f2afe4db321f408d7a4dad9b7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637159132175341924sdata=A6jnQEpZw7WeUjive%2BZN53CAIkFKJr8orsVb1FO5YqE%3Dreserved=0
> >
>  --
> > diff --git
> > a/examples/flexjs/MDLExample/src/main/flex/DropDownList.mxml
> > b/examples/flexjs/MDLExample/src/main/flex/DropDownList.mxml
> > index 14d14fd..4231328 100644
> > --- a/examples/flexjs/MDLExample/src/main/flex/DropDownList.mxml
> > +++ b/examples/flexjs/MDLExample/src/main/flex/DropDownList.mxml
> > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ limitations under the License.
> >sourceID="menuModel"
> >sourcePropertyName="menuItems"
> >destinationPropertyName="dataProvider" />
> > -

Re: [19/23] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-35328 - Update MDLExample with DataFieldProviderBead

[Alex Harui]

Ran into this while doing the has/is refactor.

In what ways is this different than the labelField in IDataProviderModel?

Thanks,
-Alex

On 6/29/17, 12:22 PM, "pio...@apache.org"  wrote:

FLEX-35328 - Update MDLExample with DataFieldProviderBead


Project: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Frepo=02%7C01%7C%7Ce9a025206cd1484d5b5808d4bf2435e8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636343609641818561=BE4Z7ZcUMq%2FhFpeKmsQUAeqzgHHQ4fBT5JKJGOAQXLQ%3D=0
Commit: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Fcommit%2Fc706278e=02%7C01%7C%7Ce9a025206cd1484d5b5808d4bf2435e8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636343609641818561=18wyjAOAvTeMBC41hZK32BZ5yEBwL0q3eY6aOedltVo%3D=0
Tree: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Ftree%2Fc706278e=02%7C01%7C%7Ce9a025206cd1484d5b5808d4bf2435e8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636343609641818561=oizDT4asGP%2F3V4FKy2otyMW5PqmufwThJblkaC2YmKk%3D=0
Diff: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Fdiff%2Fc706278e=02%7C01%7C%7Ce9a025206cd1484d5b5808d4bf2435e8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636343609641818561=gadfSlqR%2BTh%2F5pirsxkEvSjF9PnrZO2mlIlhlWiNrpY%3D=0

Branch: refs/heads/develop
Commit: c706278ed1fe5d7ab5e763c572b3d97f16077a80
Parents: eaa33ea
Author: piotrz 
Authored: Sun Jun 25 19:27:09 2017 +0200
Committer: piotrz 
Committed: Sun Jun 25 19:27:09 2017 +0200

--
 examples/flexjs/MDLExample/src/main/flex/DropDownList.mxml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--



https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit-wip-us.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fflex-asjs%2Fblob%2Fc706278e%2Fexamples%2Fflexjs%2FMDLExample%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fflex%2FDropDownList.mxml=02%7C01%7C%7Ce9a025206cd1484d5b5808d4bf2435e8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636343609641818561=QBzrdEaKyzEBxXfodisqDQFthzf0%2FXwKB6GE22q9c2Y%3D=0
--
diff --git a/examples/flexjs/MDLExample/src/main/flex/DropDownList.mxml 
b/examples/flexjs/MDLExample/src/main/flex/DropDownList.mxml
index 14d14fd..4231328 100644
--- a/examples/flexjs/MDLExample/src/main/flex/DropDownList.mxml
+++ b/examples/flexjs/MDLExample/src/main/flex/DropDownList.mxml
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ limitations under the License.
   sourceID="menuModel"
   sourcePropertyName="menuItems"
   destinationPropertyName="dataProvider" />
-  
+  
   
   
 

Re: Unable to install Apache Flex SDK Installer on macOS Catalina

[Alex Harui]

I don't have access to Catalina.  I guess I would try making sure that all 
versions of the Apache Flex SDK Installer have been uninstalled.  Then go to 
Adobe or Harman and get the latest version of AIR and install that first.  Then 
try installing the Installer again.  Some folks were complaining of this 
message recently: 
https://community.adobe.com/t5/air/air-runtime-installation-failed/td-p/10481129

You can also use Apache Ant to install the Apache Flex SDK.  

HTH
-Alex

On 12/19/19, 6:05 AM, "Wim Deblauwe"  wrote:

Hello,

I just downloaded the latest Apache Flex SDK Installer from

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0337b7cf579e4eac395908d7848c840b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637123611358342901sdata=ugzeXHR23nQ9W5hqv4wTIJJU2aVoYA4l7y5vbbIxhlM%3Dreserved=0
 which is verion 3.3.2 at the time of
writing.

When I tried to install it on my macBook Pro using macOS Catalina 10.15.2,
I get the following message:

*This application requires an update to Adobe AIR that is not available for
your system. Please view the system requirements
 for Adobe AIR and update your system
accordingly.*


The link opens http://www.adobe.com/go/air_sysreqs/ but that just redirects
to 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.adobe.com%2F404.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0337b7cf579e4eac395908d7848c840b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637123611358342901sdata=v9nLXAzmGEW0Nw5PuXU1Ul0jPj2PHYYeIPaO%2BTpryO0%3Dreserved=0
 immediately.


How can I install the Flex SDK on my computer?


regards,


Wim

Re: [Vote] Release flex-dk-converter-maven-extension

[Alex Harui]

The KEYS file is used by others to verify your signature.

The Maven gpg-plugin expects your private key to be registered somewhere on 
your computer.  Check the documentation for the gpg-plugin.  There may also be 
some other configuration you need to do on Windows if you are using PowerShell.

HTH,
-Alex

On 11/14/19, 11:25 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:

Hi,

I just commit in flex-sdk my GPG sign to KEYS file, but maybe this is not
the right place for flex-utilities. Hope some of you could let me know if
that's the right place or not.
I'm trying to do a prepare release (mvn release:prepare
-DautoVersionSubmodules=true)
and it's failing do to sign:

[*INFO*] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE

[*INFO*] [INFO]


[*INFO*] [INFO] Total time:  2.149 s

[*INFO*] [INFO] Finished at: 2019-11-14T20:23:09+01:00

[*INFO*] [INFO]


[*INFO*] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign (sign-release-artifacts)
on project apache-flex-sdk-converter: Exit code: 2 -> [Help 1]

So my first thing to solve is to get my GPG sing in the right place

thanks


El jue., 14 nov. 2019 a las 17:52, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> Carlos,
>
> Release policy documented here:
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Frelease-policy.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C76ba983a720347adafe508d769387595%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637093563522317295sdata=JogXFvfsOI54YB27Gk02LxB4uhgG3RVhQuBA%2F37Uo1o%3Dreserved=0
>
> Releases are signed artifacts, not just a repo and a tag.  Christofer Dutz
> is still making commits to the repo.  He's done a Flex release before.  He
> should be able to help you or just do it himself.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 11/14/19, 6:26 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> Notice that repository is this:
>
>
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fflex-utilitiesdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C76ba983a720347adafe508d769387595%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637093563522317295sdata=Mj%2BHzYpbhHW9crYvhy5vuf1bkl%2FAfS20%2FR1FcHqnsp0%3Dreserved=0
>
> El jue., 14 nov. 2019 a las 15:18, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> escribió:
>
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> > people need to check this extension.
> >
> > 
> > org.apache.flex.utilities.converter
> > flex-sdk-converter-maven-extension
> > 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > 
> >
> > We're using it in Apache Royale, so a good place to check it is
> building
> > Apache Royale with Maven:
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El jue., 14 nov. 2019 a las 13:38, Justin Mclean (<
> > jus...@classsoftware.com>) escribió:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> > Since this is not a flex-sdk release, we just want to release 
that
> >> piece of code.
> >>
> >> In that case you need something to check (a release candidate) for
> people
> >> to vote on, otherwise it’s not a release.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Justin
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C76ba983a720347adafe508d769387595%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637093563522317295sdata=hguIOz0e1UgPSkrBCTD8UfPSg5xvxXcoB1NpmzedUDg%3Dreserved=0
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
>
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C76ba983a720347adafe508d769387595%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637093563522317295sdata=hguIOz0e1UgPSkrBCTD8UfPSg5xvxXcoB1NpmzedUDg%3Dreserved=0
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C76ba983a720347adafe508d769387595%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637093563522317295sdata=hguIOz0e1UgPSkrBCTD8UfPSg5xvxXcoB1NpmzedUDg%3Dreserved=0

Re: [Vote] Release flex-dk-converter-maven-extension

[Alex Harui]

Carlos,

Release policy documented here:  http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html

Releases are signed artifacts, not just a repo and a tag.  Christofer Dutz is 
still making commits to the repo.  He's done a Flex release before.  He should 
be able to help you or just do it himself.

HTH,
-Alex

On 11/14/19, 6:26 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:

Notice that repository is this:


https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fflex-utilitiesdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a24289aa982471007da08d7690ead96%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637093384071011080sdata=A5D0%2Bmuy1va9We%2FfGD%2BsxRbSpHmHxRn5aSjZrkpQW90%3Dreserved=0

El jue., 14 nov. 2019 a las 15:18, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi Justin,
>
> people need to check this extension.
>
> 
> org.apache.flex.utilities.converter
> flex-sdk-converter-maven-extension
> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> 
>
> We're using it in Apache Royale, so a good place to check it is building
> Apache Royale with Maven:
>
> Thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
>
> El jue., 14 nov. 2019 a las 13:38, Justin Mclean (<
> jus...@classsoftware.com>) escribió:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Since this is not a flex-sdk release, we just want to release that
>> piece of code.
>>
>> In that case you need something to check (a release candidate) for people
>> to vote on, otherwise it’s not a release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a24289aa982471007da08d7690ead96%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637093384071011080sdata=PJcFVA0Gb5GxdtJLz1eNVa18L4ZSr3CVoZKJyxdtQU8%3Dreserved=0
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a24289aa982471007da08d7690ead96%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637093384071011080sdata=PJcFVA0Gb5GxdtJLz1eNVa18L4ZSr3CVoZKJyxdtQU8%3Dreserved=0

Re: Using ForStatementNode for AST analysis of for each statements

[Alex Harui]

Hi,

I do not know the Flex MXMLC compiler very well at all, and I'm not sure anyone 
else does either at this point.

The next generation compiler (was known as Falcon) might be worth a try.  A few 
more of us do know this compiler better, and you might find that its AST has 
what you need.   The Apache Royale project has the latest version of the Falcon 
compiler so inquire on d...@royale.apache.org if you interested.

HTH,
-Alex

On 5/8/19, 10:15 PM, "Lance Johnson"  wrote:

Greetings.

This email will probably contain some dumb questions buried in a jumble 
of context, but I'm potentially looking at patching Flex to fix this 
problem and would like to exhaust all /other/ possibilities before I do 
so.  The project I am working on has already snowballed into an 
avalanche, so additional complexity is something I would like to avoid.

I'm involved in a rather complicated modding project, where, due to 
licensing restrictions, we are patching commercially-licensed but 
undistributable code[1] by using the usual diff method, and then using 
Flex's generated AST to find particular sequences of statements in 
parsed code. We then patch them appropriately, and then emit the patched 
ActionScript using a custom Evaluator. The evaluator in question is 
based on PrettyPrinter, but is ending up being quite more exhaustive in 
order to present compilable code. We use this tool to collect 
information and patch repetitive statements that can be parsed with 
tools like regular expressions, but need thousands of lines of 
supporting code to properly keep track of context and syntax.

The problem I'm running into is that I'm having to run the Parser with 
`Context.scriptAssistParsing` turned on, as I need the AST with as few 
mutations as possible, and without loading includes or imports. 
Unfortunately, this has resulted into running into a problem with 
ForStatementNodes in this mode.

It appears that, while `for each` statements are parsed, there is no 
indication applied in NodeFactory to the ForStatementNode to indicate 
that the Node is a `for each` loop /in scriptAssistParsing mode/. In 
addition, if I were to turn scriptAssistParsing off, there would be 
significant mutations applied.  In NodeFactory.java, it appears like 
there were plans made to introduce a boolean (is_each?) to mark this, 
but it never materialized.

Is there another way to determine this information, or will I need to 
patch Flex itself to expose it?  If this is something that should be 
added to the upstream project, what would be the most agreeable means to 
implement it?  Right now, I simply plan on adding a public boolean 
is_each to ForStatementNode, and updating NodeFactory accordingly.

Thanks in advance,

Lance Johnson

1: The owners of the code in question have released it on GitHub, but 
the license terms forbid distribution of modified code or binaries, so 
we distribute our mod as patches, instead.  There's also talk of more 
permissive licensing in the future. Maybe.

Re: Get paid to help bring Apache Royale to version to 1.0 -- submit your bid for assistance to the group by Friday May 3

[Alex Harui]

Hi Flex folks,

First, we should thank Justin Hill for his generous offer.

This offer turns out to be a good opportunity to educate and/or remind folks 
how Apache projects are different from corporate-driven projects.  Here's my 
take on some of important principles at Apache.  Other Apache folks may have 
different opinions.

1) The Apache Software Foundation (the ASF) itself does not pay people to 
contribute to its projects.  So the subject of this email is a bit concerning 
since it could imply that.  But in this case, a company (Prominic) or a person 
(Justin Hill) is proposing to pay for contributions just like anyone hiring a 
contractor or employee.  Which is totally fine and in fact, encouraged.  It 
would be great if all of you who are planning to use Royale would pay for 
contributions as long as you make it clear that the ASF is not the entity 
paying.  This includes, of course, contributing patches or features to Royale 
that you write yourself (where you are paying yourself or your employer is 
paying you).  Royale is free software, but Royale will be better if every user 
finds a way to contribute.  There is no big corporation like Adobe putting in 
money up front to try to guarantee success.  This is more like a potluck than a 
restaurant.

IMO, it is fine for now for folks to post job offers on the mailing lists.  If 
we get too many job offers, we can ask for a separate mailing list or some 
other place to share job information, but for now, I am personally ok with 
having offers of work-for-pay posted on the list with a [JOB] prefix.  Others 
are welcome to object or propose other ideas.  But basically, we want to 
encourage the growth of the Royale job ecosystem without implying that Apache 
pays for contributions.  So in the future, please use [JOB] or whatever we 
converge on to distinguish that someone else is paying.

And that leads to point 2...

2) Work paid for by someone else is not guaranteed to be accepted into the 
codebase.  Whatever code or other IP is paid for and generated (documentation, 
graphics, videos, etc) might be rejected just like any other code contribution 
from a committer.  Rejections should be very rare in Royale as we have designed 
Royale to be loosely-coupled so the impact of some code on other code should be 
minimized.  But the fact remains that if a contribution does not have technical 
merit or has licensing issues it may not be accepted and certainly not because 
someone paid someone for it.

One reason something could be rejected is because of point 3...

3) Apache does not want to appear to be influenced by corporations and 
business.  What this really means is that no business entity should appear to 
be running the project, dictating schedules, roadmaps, etc.  Apache is all 
about individuals.  The person with a few hours on the weekend should be able 
to contribute.  Of course, businesses with more money can pay more folks to 
write more code and overwhelm the weekend person.  That's just life.  But that 
business cannot reject the weekend person's contribution just because it 
doesn’t fit into that business's goals/schedule.  And, no business can claim to 
be "the provider", "the sponsor", "the home of", or use similar phrases to 
imply that they are the sole entity in charge of the project.  So if a paid 
contribution implies something like that, that would be grounds for rejection.

Similarly, because Apache is about individuals, we get to point 4...

4) No individual has more influence than any other individual.  No matter who 
pays you or how many hours you have to contribute or whether you contribute 
documentation or code or help answer questions, you have an equal voice.  Sure, 
there will be technical experts on subsections of the code that have a vision 
of what that subsection should do, but that's why Royale is loosely coupled:  
so you can fork that subsection and create your own variant.  Royale itself 
probably won't designate one component set as "the one to use".  There are many 
to choose from with pros and cons for your needs.  And thus, it isn't up to 
Carlos or me or any other person to dictate what is or isn't going to happen.

Instead, projects get work done in a different way...

5) Apache projects use consensus.  Without a boss to make the call, Apache 
projects rely on consensus (actually, general consensus) to make decisions.  
That can take more time when everyone has an equal say, but there really aren't 
other options.  So if you have an idea to help Royale, post it and neither 
Carlos nor I will make a decision on it.  We may voice our opinions, but it 
will be up to everyone else reading this email list and maybe responding to 
twitter posts to make it clear which ideas are most popular.  And then, since 
Prominic or Justin Hill is paying, ultimately it is his call which ones to 
actually pay.  We want whatever he pays for to have a return on investment for 
him so he has money to pay for more work.  And the 

Re: Broken link to Adobe Air license in apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml

[Alex Harui]

Today, the re-posted the license, but at a different URL.  I've requested that 
put in a redirect at the old URL.  We'll see.
The license URL is in a data file on dist.a.o, so we could modify the data file.

Thoughts?
-Alex

On 4/19/19, 4:18 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi Alex,

It's been a while. - Did you get any info back ?

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 19 mar 2019 o 19:26 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> I don't think we want to use a link to labs.adobe.com.  I'm checking with
> the AIR folks to find out what to do.  Will report back.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 3/19/19, 4:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have noticed that we have broken link [1] to Adobe Air SDK license. 
I
> would like to correct that. Do you know whether this one [2] is ok ?
>
> [1]
>
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fflex-sdk%2Fblob%2Fba414443032b49c45ff11b61db452c8a8f428bd8%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml%23L182data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdbf2bd60c5ac4f172b7d08d6c4b8ac41%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912694804589875sdata=ikxfMiCUEY4u15MgnVqLp8CHiYOkrJihhxqeppbak1w%3Dreserved=0
> [2]
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.adobe.com%2Ftechnologies%2Feula%2Fairsdk.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdbf2bd60c5ac4f172b7d08d6c4b8ac41%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912694804589875sdata=XNzWGVyBKGuZiHwtacDy8iQYRDS%2By300oyixOTkcHuU%3Dreserved=0
>
> Thanks,
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdbf2bd60c5ac4f172b7d08d6c4b8ac41%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912694804589875sdata=U0t990BXrZePV%2ByJLsoT7pUSeVL4%2Fs3d9EDLoOaAl44%3Dreserved=0
> <
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdbf2bd60c5ac4f172b7d08d6c4b8ac41%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912694804599884sdata=MIdejZORikPFXvu9jAHmFFLY92M%2FteTx5EJS200rqp4%3Dreserved=0
> >*
>
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdbf2bd60c5ac4f172b7d08d6c4b8ac41%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912694804599884sdata=MIdejZORikPFXvu9jAHmFFLY92M%2FteTx5EJS200rqp4%3Dreserved=0

<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdbf2bd60c5ac4f172b7d08d6c4b8ac41%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912694804599884sdata=MIdejZORikPFXvu9jAHmFFLY92M%2FteTx5EJS200rqp4%3Dreserved=0>*

Re: Broken link to Adobe Air license in apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml

[Alex Harui]

I pinged the AIR team again today.

-Alex

On 4/19/19, 4:18 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi Alex,

It's been a while. - Did you get any info back ?

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 19 mar 2019 o 19:26 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> I don't think we want to use a link to labs.adobe.com.  I'm checking with
> the AIR folks to find out what to do.  Will report back.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 3/19/19, 4:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have noticed that we have broken link [1] to Adobe Air SDK license. 
I
> would like to correct that. Do you know whether this one [2] is ok ?
>
> [1]
>
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fflex-sdk%2Fblob%2Fba414443032b49c45ff11b61db452c8a8f428bd8%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml%23L182data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdbf2bd60c5ac4f172b7d08d6c4b8ac41%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912694804589875sdata=ikxfMiCUEY4u15MgnVqLp8CHiYOkrJihhxqeppbak1w%3Dreserved=0
> [2]
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.adobe.com%2Ftechnologies%2Feula%2Fairsdk.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdbf2bd60c5ac4f172b7d08d6c4b8ac41%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912694804589875sdata=XNzWGVyBKGuZiHwtacDy8iQYRDS%2By300oyixOTkcHuU%3Dreserved=0
>
> Thanks,
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdbf2bd60c5ac4f172b7d08d6c4b8ac41%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912694804589875sdata=U0t990BXrZePV%2ByJLsoT7pUSeVL4%2Fs3d9EDLoOaAl44%3Dreserved=0
> <
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdbf2bd60c5ac4f172b7d08d6c4b8ac41%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912694804599884sdata=MIdejZORikPFXvu9jAHmFFLY92M%2FteTx5EJS200rqp4%3Dreserved=0
> >*
>
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdbf2bd60c5ac4f172b7d08d6c4b8ac41%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912694804599884sdata=MIdejZORikPFXvu9jAHmFFLY92M%2FteTx5EJS200rqp4%3Dreserved=0

<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdbf2bd60c5ac4f172b7d08d6c4b8ac41%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636912694804599884sdata=MIdejZORikPFXvu9jAHmFFLY92M%2FteTx5EJS200rqp4%3Dreserved=0>*

Re: Broken link to Adobe Air license in apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml

[Alex Harui]

I don't think we want to use a link to labs.adobe.com.  I'm checking with the 
AIR folks to find out what to do.  Will report back.

-Alex

On 3/19/19, 4:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi Guys,

I have noticed that we have broken link [1] to Adobe Air SDK license. I
would like to correct that. Do you know whether this one [2] is ok ?

[1]

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fflex-sdk%2Fblob%2Fba414443032b49c45ff11b61db452c8a8f428bd8%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml%23L182data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9e1ac161ffdb4d79822608d6ac5c2484%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636885909085847653sdata=1tm2O08QNaeYgFPFI4wQrIHtndRXdS1YWV6GXyoSUqQ%3Dreserved=0
[2]  
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.adobe.com%2Ftechnologies%2Feula%2Fairsdk.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9e1ac161ffdb4d79822608d6ac5c2484%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636885909085847653sdata=QcURgjQpEITouea0NRcJinuFg%2FQQ5jte2vZThxYO4QY%3Dreserved=0

Thanks,
-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9e1ac161ffdb4d79822608d6ac5c2484%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636885909085847653sdata=Ppqa%2BLkwqZrew4qblv04LMgDiitbVGCgNpOInI3%2BemE%3Dreserved=0

*

Re: StageWebView not displaying pdf from url

[Alex Harui]

Can you create a simple example?

On 1/10/19, 3:13 PM, "alberto.lo"  wrote:

Hi, 

I have a Flex app, that access information through coldfusion, everything
works fine with that, but I also need to display pdf files from another
server something like 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmiservidor.com%2Ffile.pdfdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cfc45af3725874799847b08d677513e19%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636827588189844942sdata=8PHuDarY5HeZPAl%2FM3tzw0%2F%2FSH7yGC3LyqXfmKf333k%3Dreserved=0.
   

But the file is not displayed in the StageWebView, it use to worked but now
that I am updating to 4.16.1 its not working, any pointing direction you
could give me 

thanks

Alberto 




--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cfc45af3725874799847b08d677513e19%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636827588189844942sdata=GdCrP5B%2BzCXGGArULYFzU0XleJowpC2AgYB8s943LGM%3Dreserved=0

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

[Alex Harui]

Are we going to say that we won't fix any of the bugs currently open in JIRA?  
That might be ok.  It would help prioritize and make more clear what folks are 
still interested in.  My concern is having two active bug bases.  You may still 
end up referencing the JIRA bugs when marking new bugs as duplicates.

-Alex

On 1/8/19, 11:37 AM, "Olaf Krueger"  wrote:

I was thinking more like a cut of the old Wiki and JIRA than a migration of
the existing stuff.
I think it would be easier and more transparent for folks to handle future
development (if it will happen) by using GitHub.
We may migrate some wiki stuff someday, don't know.

Thanks,
Olaf





--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C134f454fbec74f08d97a08d675a0bada%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636825730552562081sdata=GF7m81Kmna%2BISLtw2z1wsCKXyoTO4ps151zPAu2E9D0%3Dreserved=0

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

[Alex Harui]

I'm not opposed, but I'm not sure it is worth it.  I think there are a 800+ 
bugs filed since Flex came to Apache that are still open in JIRA so JIRA is 
known to our Flex users.  Not sure if it will be confusing to have two places 
to look and I don't think we should migrate those bugs either.  Same for the 
wiki.  There's good content there but that content may not be worth migrating.  
But if someone wants to take the time, update the website links, etc, that's 
fine with me.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 1/8/19, 8:41 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:

That's ok for me, thanks! :)

About the old flex wiki, I think we still have some good info about FlexJS
still not migrated to Royale. I assume all this migration is not about all
of that right?

thanks!



El mar., 8 ene. 2019 a las 10:10, Olaf Krueger ()
escribió:

> Hi,
> I would like to create an INFRA Jira in order to ask them to enable GitHub
> "Issues" and the "Wiki" for following repositories:
>
>  - flex-tlf.git
>  - flex-utilities.git
>  - flex-flexunit.git
>  - flex-site.git
>  - flex-external.git
>  - flex-sdk.git
>  - flex-blazeds.git
>  - flex-radii8.git
>
> We will maybe use these GitHub features mainly for the flex-sdk repo, but
> maybe it makes sense to just enable it for all flex repos?
>
> Any objections?
>
> Thanks,
> Olaf
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C082657ca2436418529cb08d675882ff3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636825625117173639sdata=FmviyLt3BGx3m7ysRUtjEMLfoUIGF35D%2F78xbhgsfz4%3Dreserved=0
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C082657ca2436418529cb08d675882ff3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636825625117173639sdata=Y2RMBHeYo3aP52ueG26cd805XInmz5V4Q8kGfOVdQ1I%3Dreserved=0

[LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

[Alex Harui]

Let's try it this way.  I've changed the subject to [LAZY], which means that 
someone has to object in the next 72 hours or we'll say we have consensus and 
will enter the INFRA ticket to have the migration done ASAP.

I can't think of any reason a migration next week would be disruptive.  We're 
not in the middle of a release or lots of changes.  Maybe we won't even change 
the website until someone complains just to see if anyone actually goes to 
those pages.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 1/4/19, 2:37 AM, "Olaf Krueger"  wrote:

Hi Carlos,
yes, the migration is mandatory.
They will do the migration after February 7th without any warnings.

But my understanding is, that they asked the communities to do it before
this deadline orderly in order to avoid as much trouble as possible.
Without any feedback from the communities, they won't migrate before
February 7th.

Of course, we could wait until February 7th, but the danger is that INFRA
could be very busy then with fixing whatever other issues from other
communities.

If we want to let them do the migration earlier, we need to get a consensus
about this and we need to inform INFRA.
To get a consensus I thought a simple vote is a proper way.

Makes sense? ...of course, I could be wrong ;-)

Thanks,
Olaf










--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C96d88c9ee0824a32af2008d67230968a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636821950380188562sdata=3OPprtGJwMSrQuuFT7PRpHN5Axa22APX4q%2BwA%2FJfdYY%3Dreserved=0

Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

[Alex Harui]

They are asking for permission to do it early.  We should oblige and agree that 
they can move early and we have the people to fix up the things that need 
fixing.  If we wait, we will have more trouble getting their attention if 
things go wrong for lots of projects at one time.

-Alex

On 1/3/19, 12:00 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

I the other words it looks like we should just wait for that migration.
Once they do that I will update all those links.

Piotr

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019, 7:33 PM Alex Harui  wrote:

>
> On 1/3/19, 5:53 AM, "Olaf Krueger"  wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> if I understand it correctly we have to vote for the migration and we
> optionally can specify a date for it.
>
> However,
> - Does anybody know if this migration will break anything?
> Well, that's what we should be brainstorming.  I think we will need
> someone to:
> -update the website links to the repos
> -update any Flex jobs on builds.a.o.
> -check for links to the repos in readme files
>
> FWIW, I turned off my CI server for Flex several weeks ago just to see if
> anybody would notice.  Nobody noticed, so I'm tempted to just let it sit
> until we actually need it and then we'll have to go update those jobs.
>
> - Do we need to keep the FlexJS repositories (Maybe they can be 
deleted
> because they moved to Royale)?
>
> We should move them.  You never know if someone is using them.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
>
>

Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

[Alex Harui]

On 1/3/19, 12:47 PM, "Olaf Krueger"  wrote:

Hi,

> -update any Flex jobs on builds.a.o. 

What is builds.a.o?

Apache runs a CI service at builds.a.o.  Royale uses it for Maven.  We use my 
other CI server for Ant because there are some issues with running Flash for 
tests on builds.a.o.

> FWIW, I turned off my CI server for Flex several weeks ago

Ok, for what was it used for?
Do we need it for making a release?

It was used for Flex nightly builds and checking the MD5s on the Adobe 
downloads.  We don't need it for making a release.  It might have helped 
knowing that some other Windows machine can build the source code into release 
packages.

Is the installer affected by the migration?

I can't think of any connection between the Installer and Apache Git, but that 
is a good example of the kinds of questions we should be asking.

-Alex 


--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C526ad293d15c4103e80108d671bcb3bb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636821452613734956sdata=n876%2BNgV1Az8%2BxL94j7%2BIrAGEMZ8mLnBpCuNlOuVkOk%3Dreserved=0

Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

[Alex Harui]

On 1/3/19, 5:53 AM, "Olaf Krueger"  wrote:

Hi guys,
if I understand it correctly we have to vote for the migration and we
optionally can specify a date for it.

However, 
- Does anybody know if this migration will break anything?
Well, that's what we should be brainstorming.  I think we will need someone to:
-update the website links to the repos
-update any Flex jobs on builds.a.o.
-check for links to the repos in readme files

FWIW, I turned off my CI server for Flex several weeks ago just to see if 
anybody would notice.  Nobody noticed, so I'm tempted to just let it sit until 
we actually need it and then we'll have to go update those jobs.

- Do we need to keep the FlexJS repositories (Maybe they can be deleted
because they moved to Royale)?

We should move them.  You never know if someone is using them.

My 2 cents,
-Alex
 

Re: Flex Roadmap 2019

[Alex Harui]

Regarding Cordova performance:  Can you provide a test case or links to 
articles that prove this claim?  I've heard it before, but could not find proof 
that it will affect most "companion"-style  Flex mobile apps.  It might affect 
games.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 12/18/18, 5:37 AM, "leokan23"  wrote:

True. Roadmap can become heavy but maybe we can note down some things which
might be interesting on working for 2019. Although Royale looks awesome, the
mobile part which uses Cordova can't compete with Flex (cordova has a very
poor performance).

So I was thinking about working on the following for 2019:
Material Theme - Skin Mobile components to use the latest Material (Android)
Cupertino Theme - Skin Mobile components to use the latest iOS theme

Of course it would be good to join forces and add some things :) 



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C84bd80bdf77c4446113608d664ee0503%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636807370789642150sdata=DXuwGjmRWLIHm1514nXSYyMqctK9543%2FPIHSaqnHN44%3Dreserved=0

Re: Help needed - Error: Type was not found IEventDispatcher, IBitmapDrawable

[Alex Harui]

Hi,

Yes, your understanding is correct, the missing classes come from playerglobal. 
 There must be some configuration issue.  I don't know IntelliJ so see if you 
can get it to dump out what compiler options it is using.  There may also be 
useful console output at the beginning of the compile.

HTH,
-Alex

On 12/16/18, 11:58 PM, "Mousumi"  wrote:

Hi,

I am trying to setup a Flex + Java application which was passed on to us. It
was being developed using Flex SDK4.11. I am using Intellij Idea as the IDE
and I have installed the necessary packages. But when I build the flex
application I get errors and .swf file is not generated -
Error:[HMT_Client (module HMT Client)]: (mx.managers:IFocusManagerContainer)
Error code: 1046: Type was not found or was not a compile-time constant:
[flash.events]::IEventDispatcher.
Error:[HMT_Client (module HMT Client)]: (mx.core:IFlexDisplayObject) Error
code: 1046: Type was not found or was not a compile-time constant:
[flash.display]::IBitmapDrawable.

Aren't these packages flash.events and flash.display part of flex sdk4.11? I
am using playerglobal.swc 11.1. I am quite new to flex and have no idea how
to resolve this. 
Any help/pointers would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Mousumi 



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccc5823ad9a374d75005508d663f57ac8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636806303311338179sdata=3h8feQdxpr9HfsFEr%2Fx2dIAAXxKcGuZnt40fSzpXZxc%3Dreserved=0

Re: Help required - Board report time

[Alex Harui]

Piotr,

The wiki has a different account system than the repos.  Did you have a 
different password just for the wiki?  If you don't remember, I can try to see 
if I have enough admin privs to reset it.

-Alex

On 12/5/18, 1:49 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi Tom,

I cannot login for some reason to my account on wiki, so some thoughts in
each section.
RELEASES
There wasn't releases in the report period.

ACTIVITY & COMMUNITY
Activity on mailing list among the users stayed the same as in previous
three months. We are taking care if users have problems with
downloading SDK in case of changes related to MD5 signature on Adobe sight.

Piotr

śr., 5 gru 2018 o 10:13 Tom Chiverton  napisał(a):

> It's time to report back to the main Apache project what we have been up
> to, and I will not have time to prepare the report.
>
>
> Would someone else be able to complete a new page for December under [1]
> on the Wiki, following the template of the previous ones ?
>
>
> [1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FFLEX%2F2018data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9cf5628f4df64e96412108d65afb76f6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636796433446054259sdata=8rxTf%2B5QrXNaZap4Avfs3iakKdekiR4cvfkwst6k%2FCc%3Dreserved=0
>
> --
> *Tom Chiverton*
> Lead Developer
> e:  t...@extravision.com 
> p:  0161 817 2922
> t:  @extravision 

> w:  
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.extravision.comdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9cf5628f4df64e96412108d65afb76f6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636796433446064264sdata=N2l%2F2t%2F2o4dilsSWZEMBfPci5HbZxaT13P5fbEI1spQ%3Dreserved=0
 

>
> Extravision - email worth seeing 

> Registered in the UK at: First floor, Tomorrow, MediaCityUK, Manchester,
> M50 2AB.
> Company Reg No: 0‌‌5017214 VAT: GB 8‌‌24 5386 19
>
> This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed
> and may contain confidential or privileged information.
> Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely of the author
> and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
>
>
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.symanteccloud.comdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9cf5628f4df64e96412108d65afb76f6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636796433446064264sdata=pw6HgpU%2FEX2oRsOp7YlwsEKC%2FUTovxzpjabvBkNMQXA%3Dreserved=0
> __



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9cf5628f4df64e96412108d65afb76f6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636796433446064264sdata=4T7MsVKTp3f2UHZrk5hpooOWU0nFOii4d%2FrwpOnPsuI%3Dreserved=0

*

Re: Can't debug. Plug-ins do nothing.

[Alex Harui]

I just checked today.  For me, on Mac, the debugger plugin works fine on Safari 
12.  On Windows, I use an older Firefox (47) for compatibility with the version 
of Selenium we currently use in Royale.  That is before the NPAPI deprecation.  
And the debugger plugin works fine in that older Firefox.

This article says there is an ESR version of Firefox that might work.  
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1176670

HTH,
-Alex

On 12/6/18, 11:29 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi Greg,

Good to know about Opera!

Thanks for that!
Piotr

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 8:03 AM Greg Dove  wrote:

> I went through this not so long ago. fyi the best option I found was 
Opera.
> It's now like Chrome, but flash debugging still worked for me. If you 
can't
> get anything else to work, you might want to try that.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 6:27 PM Piotr Zarzycki 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dannemann,
> >
> > If I remember correctly you have to push your application to the server.
> > Open in the browser and than attach debugger. This is the only way of
> > resolving that issue.
> >
> > Thanks, Piotr
> >
> > pt., 7 gru 2018 o 05:52 Dannemann  napisał(a):
> >
> > > I cannot debug after installing the debuggers (version 31).
> > >
> > > I looks like firefox has disabled npapi and edge has it sandboxed.. I
> > saw a
> > > topic in microsoft where the support says it is impossible to debug in
> it
> > > right now.. same thing in chrome.. I am using windows 10 and the most
> > > updated browsers
> > >
> > > I get the message "To view this page ensure that Adobe Flash Player
> > version
> > > 31.0.0 or greater is installed. "
> > >
> > > thank you in advance
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc6e7efb23a3449c44ce008d65c15b4fa%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636797645636876217sdata=AO219YYpOjgROO51rNu%2BIE%2BLdyVpvdn0M8cf4mW8W6I%3Dreserved=0
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc6e7efb23a3449c44ce008d65c15b4fa%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636797645636876217sdata=y3lDgYRjXSR5w4Hyii7VgXlV6wzDIDp0U9vzkASlKPg%3Dreserved=0
> > 
*
> >
>

Re: Evaluate Apache Royale Emulation

[Alex Harui]

I saw that once and fixed it. I wonder if you picked up a nightly before it 
integrated those changes.  Please grab the latest and try again.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 11/12/18, 1:02 AM, "hferreira"  wrote:

Hi piotrz,

Of course:

Uncaught ReferenceError: null0 is not defined
at new HelloRoyale (HelloRoyale.js:56)
at
HelloRoyale_mx_managers_SystemManager.mx.managers.SystemManager.create
(SystemManager.js:192)
at

HelloRoyale_mx_managers_SystemManager.mx.managers.SystemManager.initializeTopLevelWindow
(SystemManager.js:234)
at HelloRoyale_mx_managers_SystemManager.mx.managers.SystemManager.start
(SystemManager.js:222)
at index.html:477

I notice that with "pure" Roayle framework we need to use 
however this is the Emulation counterpart.



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca1bfd26a3c29473873c008d6487d8884%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636776101328520281sdata=Gn5XFtZYxKH1hAuQ7%2F9DgyiI1KRWKvH9NGfsbwfi%2F1g%3Dreserved=0

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

[Alex Harui]

Does any other PMC member have time to use an unsubscribed email to see what 
happens?  Otherwise, I will try myself later.

-Alex

On 11/11/18, 1:55 PM, "hferreira"  wrote:

Yes, I'm having issues posting on Apache Royale foruns for some reason.
What I'm doing here is login in nable and create a post and works.

On Apache Royale foruns, I tried exactly the same.
Also tried to send e-mail directly to us...@royale.apache.org as a desperate
measure but always got errors but I would like to use nable.

Yes, I agree that the community should make that happens.
I hope I can contribute any time soon.



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf63ce04ccd6e4285015308d648205dc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636775701186428155sdata=0zlwize7iVlCSwc9zOSQkedTJkBPR18pspi6hA%2F1IYc%3Dreserved=0

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

[Alex Harui]

I have never used Nabble other than to click on links to emails.  When you say 
"registration" what steps are you doing to register?  If you detail what steps 
you are taking I will try it using some other email address I have to see what 
happens and see if I can reproduce the problems you are having.  It would be a 
bad problem for Royale if folks cannot join us via Nabble.

When you write that the 1.0 Emulation Components should be as fully-compatible 
with Flex as possible, I feel compelled to keep reminding people that Royale is 
not an Adobe-led effort like Flex or even Cordova.  There is no plan for Adobe 
to try to make any money off of Royale, so  there is no team of Adobe employees 
trying to develop Royale.  I'm just here as a generous donation from Adobe to 
try to build a self-sustaining community of non-Adobe people at Apache.  So if 
you want maximum compatibility with Flex, you and others have to make that 
happen.  There is no way for me to do that by myself any time soon.  I would 
love to work on Royale for the rest of my career, but it is unlikely that Adobe 
will pay me to do that forever.  So everyone else who wants Royale to succeed 
must take it upon themselves to learn the code and contribute code.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 11/9/18, 4:59 AM, "hferreira"  wrote:

Hi Alex,

I see now at once all my attempts to Flex Users mailing list (I like to use
directly from Nabble, despite of the UI).

However, I still don't see any change no Royale Users mailing list:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1752a59686bd4468547808d646432f2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636773651702504677sdata=4vNOb3sV3xSMlYxuzepqEsUacLRSBqi929lJxuzTf5Y%3Dreserved=0
Perhaps a issue related with permissions of my user (I have the registration
on Apache Flex foruns from a long time but my registration on Royale is
new).

About the questions:
You can generate an API Report by following these instructions: 

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FGenerating-an-API-Reportdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1752a59686bd4468547808d646432f2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636773651702504677sdata=PxcasCNSgv0C%2BGp9PzRLKk%2FkrOOf2uR9VdUaqB4a8io%3Dreserved=0
R: Thank you. I will investigate that.

1) Apache Royale does have some support for FXG.  It might need 
improvement. 
R: OK. I use FXG and love it.
2) AIR APIs are generally replaced by Cordova APIs/Plugins.  So see if
Cordova has suitable SQLite plugins. 
R: OK.
3) AIR Native Extensions are also generally replaced by Cordova Plugins. 
R: OK.

Seems that I have a long way to go thru ...
I Will do it on baby steps as a parallel project along with my development
that can't stop.

I did the same with my backend for convert from .NET Framework to .NET Core.
It took me an year but is now it's a reallity and stable to finally ready to
move.
I converted the code, check the conflit points. Found alternatives
compatible with both frameworks at put them in productions (allows to
garantee that works).
And on the very limit I ended up build new components and offer then to the
community (since it's not my core).

I will try do the same strategy the frontend (Flex to Royale), because after
what I see now, Royale seems to be a real thing now and it's not a alpha
product anymore (at least on the general concept).

I first experience (a very long time ago) was so bad that even to build a
simple test case was a nightmare but now I can.

The new components are very important as good foundations however the
emulation that you guys are working is the key for the success.
There are a lot of projects out there that without the emulation are
impossible to migrate (even so it's a hard work) and if this projects move
to Royale, the community will grow.
On my opinion, the version 1.0 should have the emulation as complete as
possible.



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1752a59686bd4468547808d646432f2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636773651702504677sdata=7ReoVLVBX863OXFr15aiO4N6jdqGY3GRwXsx4JTL%2Fes%3Dreserved=0

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

[Alex Harui]

Your posts via Nabble to dev@flex.a.o are working.  I can see them without 
going to Nabble.

Something may be broken with Nabble and Royale.  I noticed you were trying 
users@royale.  Did you also try d...@royale.apache.org?  If not, give it a try, 
and also try directly sending an email instead of using Nabble.

-Alex

On 11/8/18, 10:25 AM, "hferreira"  wrote:

Alex, your e-mail is hidden on this thread.

I'm using directly nabble website.

Anyway, this was my post (attempt to):

Following

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2FQuestion-on-Migrating-from-Flex-to-FlexJS-td65514.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C532461892248464eb09508d645a79968%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636772983470391514sdata=Xk1EieutLb1l2Is7lwOzUcNqKkk2ruql4mVtpj3H3rs%3Dreserved=0
...

"we have some tooling to try to analyze your code"
Great. Can you please point me where this tools are and how to use them (I
suposed that's a command line) ?

A few questions:
1. Apache Roayle support FXG (visual elements and colors with XML) in the
same way as Flex SDK or there is plans to ?
2. Flex SDK on AIR have native support (without ANE) for SQLite. This is
very important for mobile applications and also for offline content on
desktop applications. Does Royale supports this ?
3. AIR supports native extensions that are important for mobile. How Apache
Roayle deals with that ?

Chears,
Hugo.



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C532461892248464eb09508d645a79968%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636772983470401518sdata=0I415cQsaR%2B25mHw1gBwxv6cDlf8YSUw3JeQrAYhbbQ%3Dreserved=0

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

[Alex Harui]

Hi,

Emails I sent at 6pm last night are finally showing up on the mailing list now 
(10am).  Sometimes the mail servers fall behind.

I just realized that I have not seen any moderation emails for users@royale.  I 
will check on that.

Nightly builds are here:
http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/

-Alex

On 11/8/18, 10:07 AM, "hferreira"  wrote:

Alex,

The e-mail links are hidden !
Anyway, I tried to subscribe again.

Meanwhile I tried to get the night build (I really, really want to see
MX/Spark emulation on action) but I got a page error !

"we have some tooling to try to analyze your code"
Great. Can you please point me where this tools are and how to use them (I
suposed that's a command line) ?

A few more questions:
1. Apache Roayle support FXG (visual elements and colors with XML) in the
same way as Flex SDK or there is plans to ?
2. Flex SDK on AIR have native support (without ANE) for SQLite. This is
very important for mobile applications and also for offline content on
desktop applications. Does Royale supports this ?
3. AIR supports native extensions that are important for mobile. How Apache
Roayle deals with that ?



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C35ce67ca107a45dc4c5b08d645a50b81%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636772972495360658sdata=k3rOPJ8Qu0pX3aq4g5er1vduMKY7knB%2Fc7hOn%2FQLvO4%3Dreserved=0

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

[Alex Harui]

Hmm.  Try sending an email to d...@royale.apache.org and cc aha...@apache.org 
so I can see what you send.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 11/7/18, 2:54 PM, "hferreira"  wrote:

Alex Harui-2,

I tried both !



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cba602fb975c642eb9c9108d6450407cd%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636772280950151954sdata=pPe9TByqFWnI30Cjk4xTDgd5n3KOXmqpeNf46i3rImg%3Dreserved=0

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

[Alex Harui]

Hmm.  Are you using Nabble to email the Royale Dev list or directly emailing 
d...@royale.apache.org?

All Apache lists are moderated.  It is recommended that you subscribe by 
emailing dev-subscr...@royale.apache.org and the email robot will send you an 
acknowledge email that you have to respond to.  If you directly email dev@ 
without subscribing, it should show up in the moderation queue and I didn't see 
anything in the queue.  If you are using Nabble, I don't know how it works 
because I don't use it.  Maybe someone else can help.

-Alex

On 11/7/18, 1:17 AM, "hferreira"  wrote:

Hi Alex,

I have replied on Apache Royale mailing list for users.
I don't see my post there.
There is an approval process ?

Regards,
Hugo.



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cab670c3bd99a467b1ec008d64491dd29%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636771790612395770sdata=3P4LuqvvPUaH2QuZyxqOpOMUyy%2BPU0wyNqJkt0HXMU8%3Dreserved=0

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

[Alex Harui]

Hi,

The next release should have better support for emulation components.  You do 
have to change the xml namespace to use them:

  xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx"
  xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"

need to be changed to:

  xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx"
  xmlns:s="library://ns.apache.org/royale/spark"

Regarding migrating your application, we have some tooling to try to analyze 
your code and see what Flash and Flex APIs are using.  And you can just fork 
your code, replace the XML namespaces and see what happens.

Regarding the external components, you can examine the imports they use to see 
what flash classes are being used.   MXML files have some hidden "automatic"  
imports so it is a bit harder to see what they use.  We have emulated some 
Flash classes, but it is not a goal to emulate all of them.  We want to get 
away from dependencies on Flash APIs because some sort of rely on the way Flash 
renders, and some features like listener priorities and weak references are not 
easily reproduced on other platforms.

You can get started now with a nightly build.  Please continue the conversation 
over at d...@royale.apache.org.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 11/6/18, 5:26 PM, "hferreira"  wrote:

Hi Alex,

I just come from the first Apache Royale test (current version 0.9.2).
I think that my last attempt was 0.5 (or less) !

Starting on the IDE:
I know by now why there is no starting tutorial for IntelliJ: Because does
guys are waiting to see where this will end up, so there is no official
IntelliJ support by now.
Flash Builder as said before is not an opinion for years and I will not go
back there.
I tryed Moonshine and seems that this IDE was designed for Apache Royale. I
couldn't expect that could be easier to start a project (even for a
beginner), however without intellisense support unfortunately it's a no.
For last but not least, I went thru Visual Studio Code (ho, boy that text
editor evolved from my last test). Everything it's manual however following
this instructions

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FVisual-Studio-Codedata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49a953b78b2a4e324c2208d6444fff87%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636771507711668266sdata=jIJop6p5wZur1kZksz%2BvBUGjxeQmchJ06Rpq21ffsoQ%3Dreserved=0
 I was able to
build a Hello Word test project and then started to play around.
Intellisense works out of the box !
And I saw references to TLF on intellisense that you mentioned before (very
good :) ).

Pure Apache Royale it's noticeable more mature than before and without
compiling errors on the first experience. It's not a alpha product anymore
an deserves to be almost version 1.0 but this was a short test.
I didn't even care about debug for now.

As explain before, for me, to be even possible to move from Apache Flex to
Apache Royale, I need to:
1. Move a very big ship (block by block) to your new approach emulation
components (accepting that they will not optimised for speed);
2. Find a way to move a few external components (I have the source code of
all them);
3. Fix a lot of issues during a few months in tests;
4. Then and only then, I can start moving pieces of components to pure
Apache Royale (accepting that there is the possibility to end up with a mix
of pure Apache Royale components and emulated ones but I already have that
with MX and Spark anyway).

During this test, I tryed but not be able to use any MX component so my
guess is that is not yet on this release and perhaps only on the night
builds or even on your local machine waiting for commit. This assumption is
correct ?
MX and Spark emulation are predicted for the next 0.9.3 ?

As you can imagine, there is old code that is not following the best
approach.
I have the business logic separated from the UI but it's not all the cases.
My first work will be starting refactoring and this, I can start right now.
As much perfection my code is before the port, easier will be.
Then, only after MX and Spark emulation be on a release will make sense to
start but I'm excited to do and when I enter on that space, for sure that I
will be a contributor (at least on documentation for others, report bugs and
provide fixs).

Thank you very much for you work since always on this project.
For what I saw, I believe that one day I may move my code (I was not
expecting that).



--
Sent from: 

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

[Alex Harui]

Hi,

Yes, your understanding is correct in that there is a set of components in 
Royale called Basic that are aimed more at small, fast applications than at 
backward-compatibility with Flex.

It is a fair amount of work to migrate your code to the Basic components, 
although still much less work than porting all of our code to some other JS 
Framework.  If you have good separation of "business logic" from your UI, you 
should find that your business logic can be used with few changes.  That's the 
biggest savings as you don't have to debug all of those lines of code agin.  
Instead, the work is in rewriting your UI to use the Basic components, although 
some folks want to do that anyway to modernize their UI.

Carlos is working on a component set called Jewel that has more modern UI 
widgets.

And I and some others are working on the Emulation Components.  Their goal is 
to require much less rewriting of your existing Flex MXML.  It won't be as 
small and fast, and you will be able to swap out some pieces for smaller/faster 
ones if you need to and have the time.  It isn't really a one-man show.  For 
sure, I am doing a significant amount of the work, but there are others helping 
out in smaller contributions and every contribution counts.  We hope you and 
others will join us.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 11/6/18, 11:10 AM, "hferreira"  wrote:

My beloved flex tour (not see for a long time now) in Roayle :D
I read in the past that intention but did not know it was actually done.

"I am focused on the Emulation Components that are intended to mimic MX and
Spark components in Flex in order to lower the effort of migrating from Flex
to Royale"
That would definitively make the things easier and it's on my opinion the
good way to go.
I understand that started as things in Royale that are not compatible with
Flex, so you could evolve however have a compatible layer it's a most to
have.
If I migrate an entire project, later I can move each piece for something
more like Royale.

I understand that this is a community but end up with one man show (you).

I would love to contribute as I already did (a little) with Flex, however I
need to first enter on Roayle that it's a completly new game for me, so I'm
new on that field but you wake up my interested, so I will check later.

Thank you.




--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce0c59550ffae46b87de408d6441b7dd2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636771282197811599sdata=CVggiJDcWzGHhWKKU930jt2RmG4Lj5fA87EL1HQJKz0%3Dreserved=0

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

[Alex Harui]

Yep, we can always use more tutorials and other "on-boarding" material.

I personally have not worked too much on that because I think for right now, my 
energy is best spent on making sure that the code actually works.  It seems 
that most folks don't have the experience and time to work on that.  I think 
that there are more folks, including you, who are capable of writing small bits 
of documentation and examples and could help us build up that set of material.

One thing about Royale is that there is no one set of UI widgets that you must 
use.  I think that's good in that you are not locked into using MX or Spark or 
in Royale's case, the Basic components or Jewel.  You can use Jquery, CreateJS, 
Material Design Lite.  You can wrap any existing JS framework that has a 
procedural API, and probably others if you really wanted to.  Royale is really 
in the business of creating a software developer workflow for assembling chunks 
of JavaScript together.  But that makes it harder for generating 
getting-started materials because there are multiple paths you can get started 
on.

Right now, I am focused on the Emulation Components that are intended to mimic 
MX and Spark components in Flex in order to lower the effort of migrating from 
Flex to Royale.  It won't be 100% backward compatible, but should be much less 
rewriting than porting to other JS frameworks.

Here is a link to Tour De Flex migrated to Royale with relatively few changes:
http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/TourDeFlexMigration/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules/bin/js-debug/index.html

Only  the MX/Visual Components/General Controls have been seen to run (except 
ColorPicker), but I'm finishing up LineChart right now.  The demo may break at 
times and the visuals are not tuned up, but it will give you an idea of what is 
possible.  We just need more folks to contribute.  Anyone who contributes helps 
lower the cost of migrating for everyone else.  If we get lots of people 
pitching in, it is like having a large team to migrate your app.

-Alex 

On 11/6/18, 10:28 AM, "hferreira"  wrote:

I just checked the Apache Royale web site and seems good (comparing to my
last visit a long time ago).
Still many "TODO" pages.

By change, I tried the starting IntelliJ and a TODO page.
However I see that the others IDE's already have a start page, but I don't
use Flash Builder (for many years now), Visual Studio Code it's not a IDE
and I would not go thru Moonshine (I don't want to see me there), so I will
try with Visual Studio Code the tutorial.

I checked the mailing list (for the very first time) and surprisingly seems
to be very active).

I definitively will try later to build a sample use case.

I know that this is a community project (and that a strong point on my
opinion), however I continue to think that an important peace is messing: A
lot of tutorials and sample starting projects.



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C98beed1437d84a741e8d08d64415b3c4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636771257328824888sdata=Bza%2BXb2j9086t6pxylfvIbm2vP%2FusJxy4pGrWHquuJc%3Dreserved=0

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

[Alex Harui]

FWIW, Harbs can say more about what didn't get migrated, but TLF is running in 
Royale without Flash/AIR.

What else is on your list of missing features?

Thanks,
-Alex

On 11/6/18, 3:30 AM, "hferreira"  wrote:

Hi,

I will give you my input of this one:
I have a large Flex project for many years now (more than 1.5 millions lines
of code and growing).
This project started for AIR because on that time was predicted that one day
Flash on Web will end and HTML5 was just an ideia on that time (also there
was the intention to use features directly from desktop that they are very
difficult to get on the web space).
Even so, this project have very complex features that it's not possible on
the present with any web technology that I know !

I already tested FlexJS (now Apache Royale) for about 2 years now and "for
me" it was a pre-alpha quality product on that time.
I believe that now it's more mature but even so without things like Flex TLF
support I wouldn't even take a look and probably we will never get this kind
of specific features.

If I was you, I would take a look on Apache Royale and invest a few time to
try to port the code (at least you will know if this is an option to
consider or not).

Than you have the AIR option that it's a guarantee low friction porting
option, however it's a change of paradigma (desktop vs web).
I strongly recommend a "click once"/"auto-update" or what ever you would
like to call, option.
For this, I designed mysef an auto-update mechanism compatible with Windows
and macOS available on Github with MIT license.



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce0c080802bd49874d9b08d643db3f9e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63677100627482sdata=6E6%2FQqdP4YmQ%2FZO3KhkeThl3oUpKvOmFhNd3nwX8k3A%3Dreserved=0

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

[Alex Harui]

Hi Michelle,

FlexJS became the Apache Royale project about a year ago.  I encourage you to 
find out more about FlexJS/Royale on the Royale mailing list 
(d...@royale.apache.org).

It isn't just IE and Edge.  Just about every popular browser will turn off 
Flash by the end of 2020.  Of course, I'm biased towards Royale since that's 
what I spend my day working on, but I think the safest choice is to choose an 
open-source development environment like Royale.  That way you are free from 
corporate decisions about product futures.  No corporation controls Apache 
projects like Royale, and users are encouraged to become contributors so that 
you or other people like you can help cut releases, fix bugs, create new 
features, etc.  That way, you ensure that you have more control over the future.

So far, I've heard the following options:

1) Apache Royale
2) Adobe AIR
3) Extended IE support
4) Custom Browser.

Depending on resources and timeframes, Adobe AIR might make sense if you are ok 
changing your deployment model.  All future updates have to be "installed" or 
your AIR app has to be a "shell" that downloads the rest of the app.  
Converting a Flash Browser app to AIR might be less work if there is a lot of 
Flash animation/timeline content.  Royale doesn't have any replacement for 
frame-based SWF animations.  If you know that browser video quality is 
insufficient, you might also choose AIR video.  You also need to be aware of 
subtle differences between AIR and Flash around security, ExternalInterface, 
and some other APIs.  On the other hand, having access to the file system might 
be a benefit.

If you control what browser your users use, I've heard that IE will have 
extended support for Flash, but I think there is an end date for that 
eventually.

I've also heard that some folks are trying to create browsers that will host 
the Flash plugin.

Anyway, I hope to see you on the Royale lists.

-Alex

On 11/1/18, 3:00 AM, "michelle_s...@tzuchi.com.tw" 
 wrote:

Hi, good day!

We have a very large and complex healthcare information system 
where its front-end is written in Flex 
(the Flex SDK we are currently using is FlexSDK416).

We are very concerned about the future of the browser support 
particularly Internet Explorer & Edge 
for our Flex applicaton.

If Internet Explorer & Edge will not be supporting Flex anymore starting 
next year,
how and to what technology should we migrate our Flex application?
Should we use AIR, FlexJS or which one is appropriate?
I would like to have your professional advise on this matter as you are 
the experts on Flex.

I would greatly appreciate your response on this matter.

Thanks and regards,
Michelle
Hualien, Taiwan
Tzu Chi Medical Foundation

Re: Info

[Alex Harui]

Hi Dino,

As I understand it, there are two phases to building an AIR app.  The first 
phase is building a SWF.  The second phase is packaging.

I have not tried it myself, but one thing you can try is using Flash Builder 
with Flex 4.0 and whatever AIR SDK came with your Flash Builder to build the 
SWF.  SWFs are not 32-bit or 64-bit.

Then, without Flash Builder, run a script to do the packaging with a newer AIR 
SDK.  If you use Apache Ant as the scripting language, you can launch that 
script from Flash Builder.

HTH,
-Alex

On 9/21/18, 12:29 AM, "cataldo.debenedic...@sabanet.it" 
 wrote:

HI Alex,

we use Flash Builder 4.7 and flex 4.0 sdk and in this situation the build 
is at 32 bit.

We try to set the environment variable AIR_ARC_WIN = 64, in the o.s., but 
have no effect and the build of air application is again at 32 bit.

I have found a work around in the merge the flex sdk 4.6 with air sdk 31.0 
beta and building a captive application air and then we have finally a 64 bit 
application (but the distribution of this kind of app is very more difficult 
and the upgrade of the library from 4.0 to 4.6 take it problem of compatibilty).

If you have any suggestion to solve this solution, please reply me.

HYH,
Dino.

-Messaggio originale-
    Da: Alex Harui  
Inviato: giovedì 20 settembre 2018 18:18
A: dev@flex.apache.org
Oggetto: Re: Info

The Flex SDK Installer is 64-bit for Windows.   It is done by setting:

64

In the -app.xml file before packaging.

HTH,
-Alex

On 9/20/18, 1:34 AM, "cataldo.debenedic...@sabanet.it" 
 wrote:

Hy,

 

i'm porting a flex desktop application to an air application but i don't
have any idea on how to compile the AIR applicaton to 64 bit (because 
the
version at 32 bit have a limit memory of 1.3 gigabyte).

 

Any suggestion to solve the problem?

 

Cataldo De Benedictis  

CTO | Sabanet S.r.l.

 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sabanet.it%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6f03e8a7c25745f9b55208d61f93f5ef%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636731117702050158sdata=mcLFfn2xNTlkK1lvUmmUz0eqHOpp2ErMqAo5bn991G8%3Dreserved=0>
 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.sabanet.itdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6f03e8a7c25745f9b55208d61f93f5ef%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636731117702050158sdata=s1AzPdrczlzfRo%2BWr0pBXMJNWHxJ%2B7ZuK28OGhjKm6Q%3Dreserved=0

 <mailto:cataldo.debenedic...@sabacom.it> 
cataldo.debenedic...@sabacom.it

 

Mobile +39 393 891 59 06

 

Re: Info

[Alex Harui]

The Flex SDK Installer is 64-bit for Windows.   It is done by setting:

64

In the -app.xml file before packaging.

HTH,
-Alex

On 9/20/18, 1:34 AM, "cataldo.debenedic...@sabanet.it" 
 wrote:

Hy,

 

i'm porting a flex desktop application to an air application but i don't
have any idea on how to compile the AIR applicaton to 64 bit (because the
version at 32 bit have a limit memory of 1.3 gigabyte).

 

Any suggestion to solve the problem?

 

Cataldo De Benedictis  

CTO | Sabanet S.r.l.

 

 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.sabanet.itdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6787c23b58c94188767408d61ed3eb92%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636730292887237510sdata=KNH%2BwVHdx9N%2B%2FW9YQL9a%2FDSd0kExx1nkYtdA8MVEVA4%3Dreserved=0

  cataldo.debenedic...@sabacom.it

 

Mobile +39 393 891 59 06

 

Re: [Announce] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 Released

[Alex Harui]

In theory, no users would use binaries, even the convenience installer.  
Everyone would use source packages and build themselves.  I see emails where 
new projects are being instructed not to provide binaries.  In practice for 
Flex, that isn't even close to reality, but nobody has bothered to try to come 
up with a more "pro" name, and the experience was supposed to start with the 
badge installer which I think would hide the name anyway.  If you want to 
create a new release with different names, propose a patch and volunteer to be 
the release manager.  IMO, there are bigger fish to fry.

I think we've seen certificate issues with installers built by my computers.  
Not sure why.  I was hoping that it would get verified during the voting 
period.  But if you had downloaded a pre-release version of the installer then 
it has a temporary certificate and you must uninstall it before installing the 
release version.  I guess we'll find out how many other folks hit this issue.

-Alex

On 7/17/18, 1:02 PM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:

Why would we need to be emphasizing the source in the name of the
convenience installer, as compared to in the name of the source code
download? I would think the installer names should look as "pro" as
possible.

Uninstalling the previous version and then installing worked. If that is
the expected behavior, do we say so anywhere?

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Alex Harui 
wrote:

> The name is a standard pattern at Apache.  I don't think it is a
> requirement, but we are supposed to be emphasizing the "source".
>
> Try uninstalling whatever version you have and re-installing.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 7/17/18, 12:25 PM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
>
> Why does the installer file name include "bin"? That does not seem
> ideal.
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
>
> > When I try to install the installer, I get a message that there is
> > something wrong with the certificate. Has anyone else installed is
> > successfully?
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of
> Apache
> >> Flex
> >> SDK Installer 3.3.2
> >>
> >> Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application
> framework for
> >> building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy
> consistently
> >> on all major browsers, desktops and devices (including smartphones,
> >> tablets
> >> and tv).
> >>
> >> Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 is an update to Apache Flex SDK
> Installer
> >> 3.3.1. Installer 3.3.1 has an issue on Windows to handle large
> downloads
> >> because of its 32-bit version. In order to work around this issue,
> the
> >> 32-bit based installer runs a 64-bit version of the installer now.
> You
> >> will
> >> be notified about that during the execution of the installer.
> >>
> >> Apache Flex SDK Installer is available in source form from the
> following
> >> download page: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Fdownload-source.html
> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8254d7fd61704bbe705f08d5ec1b0563%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636674523159474317
> sdata=61zn8Whrjrg%2BVqpn04lVWvNm5RuUj4vVuFkz%2Bq1V4L4%3Dreserved=0
> >>
> >> Executables for Windows and Mac are available here:
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller.htmldata=02%
> 7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8254d7fd61704bbe705f08d5ec1b0563%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636674523159474317sdata=
> v84mCd6bQZzgbpu7O9lOet0S3tiirjQFgI1Pto1kp1U%3Dreserved=0
> >>
> >> When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify the
> >> downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.
> >>
> >> For more information on Apache Flex, visit the project home page:
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.orgdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C8254d7fd6170

Re: [Announce] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 Released

[Alex Harui]

The name is a standard pattern at Apache.  I don't think it is a requirement, 
but we are supposed to be emphasizing the "source".

Try uninstalling whatever version you have and re-installing.

HTH,
-Alex

On 7/17/18, 12:25 PM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:

Why does the installer file name include "bin"? That does not seem ideal.

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Andrew Wetmore  wrote:

> When I try to install the installer, I get a message that there is
> something wrong with the certificate. Has anyone else installed is
> successfully?
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
>> Flex
>> SDK Installer 3.3.2
>>
>> Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework for
>> building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy consistently
>> on all major browsers, desktops and devices (including smartphones,
>> tablets
>> and tv).
>>
>> Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 is an update to Apache Flex SDK Installer
>> 3.3.1. Installer 3.3.1 has an issue on Windows to handle large downloads
>> because of its 32-bit version. In order to work around this issue, the
>> 32-bit based installer runs a 64-bit version of the installer now. You
>> will
>> be notified about that during the execution of the installer.
>>
>> Apache Flex SDK Installer is available in source form from the following
>> download page: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Fdownload-source.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8254d7fd61704bbe705f08d5ec1b0563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636674523159474317sdata=61zn8Whrjrg%2BVqpn04lVWvNm5RuUj4vVuFkz%2Bq1V4L4%3Dreserved=0
>>
>> Executables for Windows and Mac are available here:
>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8254d7fd61704bbe705f08d5ec1b0563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636674523159474317sdata=v84mCd6bQZzgbpu7O9lOet0S3tiirjQFgI1Pto1kp1U%3Dreserved=0
>>
>> When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify the
>> downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.
>>
>> For more information on Apache Flex, visit the project home page:
>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.orgdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8254d7fd61704bbe705f08d5ec1b0563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636674523159474317sdata=S3uWXTFdBMbVONG3v%2B2%2B3duZZR288lQMEhK1ObVax%2B4%3Dreserved=0
>>
>> Thank you for using Apache Flex,
>> The Apache Flex Community
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8254d7fd61704bbe705f08d5ec1b0563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636674523159474317sdata=9SWPKn9netXJ8mwKqIakqzJxfiDegKYyG1KFAasQ4uU%3Dreserved=0
>> 
*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8254d7fd61704bbe705f08d5ec1b0563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636674523159474317sdata=fOEeWjp%2FeGgoCj7zJ1LlbycGa5%2BUypfOgIR5ZLKrFCY%3Dreserved=0
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore


https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8254d7fd61704bbe705f08d5ec1b0563%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636674523159474317sdata=fOEeWjp%2FeGgoCj7zJ1LlbycGa5%2BUypfOgIR5ZLKrFCY%3Dreserved=0

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 Released!

[Alex Harui]

"Installer 3.3.1 has an on"  Should this be  "Installer 3.3.1 has an issue on"

Otherwise, looks ok.

On 7/12/18, 1:54 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Draft proposition with Olaf's changes.

--- Start Draft ---
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex
SDK Installer 3.3.2

Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework for
building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy consistently
on all major browsers, desktops and devices (including smartphones, tablets
and tv).

Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 is an update to Apache Flex SDK Installer
3.3.1. Installer 3.3.1 has an on Windows to handle large downloads because
of its 32-bit version. In order to work around this issue, the 32-bit based
installer runs a 64-bit version of the installer now. You will be notified
about that during the execution of the installer.

Apache Flex SDK Installer is available in source form from the following
download page: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Fdownload-source.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C23b2b70f28db4cde185908d5e8399f6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636670256542486187sdata=%2BQc6NY23ro0Zp7wRNopfUKbPDwigY8gGtlT6iMfx%2B6I%3Dreserved=0

Executables for Windows and Mac are available here:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C23b2b70f28db4cde185908d5e8399f6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636670256542486187sdata=1leiK7LIVhubgNP77WZqDeejkkf%2Bl8j3AFdNWwN%2BK2E%3Dreserved=0

When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify the
downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.

For more information on Apache Flex, visit the project home page:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.orgdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C23b2b70f28db4cde185908d5e8399f6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636670256542486187sdata=brFMnuQRMDKAXd6t1lp35MeDF3%2FU7GY9o4iZ1PIyMRE%3Dreserved=0

Thank you for using Apache Flex,
The Apache Flex Community

 End Draft -

Thanks,
Piotr

śr., 11 lip 2018 o 08:02 Olaf Krueger  napisał(a):

> Hi Piotr,
> thanks again for preparing the release!
> I just wonder if we should inform the users a bit more about what happens
> by
> using the current release.
> So, just a suggestion:
> Instead of this [1] maybe something like this?:
>
> The Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 is an update to the Apache Flex SDK
> Installer
> 3.3.1 which has an issue to handle large downloads because of its 32-bit
> version.
> In order to work around this issue, the 32-bit based installer runs a
> 64-bit
> version
> of the installer now. You'll be notified about this during the execution 
of
> the installer.
>
> Thanks,
> Olaf
>
>
> [1]
> Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 is an update to Apache Flex SDK Installer
> 3.3.1. It provides ability to run on Windows Apache Flex Installer as
> 64-bit app in order to handle large memory consumption during downloads.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C23b2b70f28db4cde185908d5e8399f6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636670256542486187sdata=M6mGHuRwkdYvAOjUBW779%2BmKUSux36b%2FL4fy32JPOEU%3Dreserved=0
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C23b2b70f28db4cde185908d5e8399f6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636670256542486187sdata=EJLHy9ARLNCfg4VGvFX6pSiatmRa1f9k47sFZ2IaBnc%3Dreserved=0

*

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 Released!

[Alex Harui]

Hi Piotr,

Looks fine.  I wonder if we should mention how on Windows the 32-bit version 
will load and run the 64-bit version.

Thoughts?
-Alex

On 7/9/18, 10:53 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi Guys,

I'll send this out after the mirrors and the web pages get updated.

-- Start Draft announcement ---

The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex
SDK Installer 3.3.2

Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework for
building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy consistently
on all major browsers, desktops and devices (including smartphones, tablets
and tv).

Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 is an update to Apache Flex SDK Installer
3.3.1.

Apache Flex SDK Installer is available in source form from the following
download page: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Fdownload-source.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5ca92ec317a4103309008d5e5c4d228%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636667555852497278sdata=qq0K5i7I9rPrrGxDSTANw2dW8eQcgFXy1neYgsvzTns%3Dreserved=0

Executables for Windows and Mac are available here:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller.htmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5ca92ec317a4103309008d5e5c4d228%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636667555852507283sdata=xBQWjnS8zwW9bL0VyxHc5C%2FBoiNsYO74vcEzwzYcq%2B8%3Dreserved=0

When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify the
downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.

For more information on Apache Flex, visit the project home page:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.orgdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5ca92ec317a4103309008d5e5c4d228%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636667555852507283sdata=tSpqi9yUic%2F2W8A3xnzzmQfD3hql0SsH0XdO5NAmDIw%3Dreserved=0

Thank you for using Apache Flex,
The Apache Flex Community

-- end draft announcement --

Thanks,
-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5ca92ec317a4103309008d5e5c4d228%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636667555852507283sdata=R7soSswPVv5K2%2FQ90yU1NPjjm0nPtQKCzBUZVx4Uj7A%3Dreserved=0

*

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC1*

[Alex Harui]

Hi Olaf,

The reason for this odd configuration is so that we can run the Windows version 
of the Apache Flex Installer as a 64-bit app so it has more memory to handle 
the downloads.  You can only make Windows 64-bit AIR apps as captive runtime.  
The Native versions are always 32-bit.  But the Native versions can be 
installed with the NativeInstaller and be launched by a badge installer from a 
web page.  Captive Runtime apps need to be installed somehow.

So, we keep a 32-bit version around that can be installed and launched by the 
web page, but it always tries to download (if needed) and run the 64-bit 
version to do any actual installing of Flex SDKs.  IOW, the 32-bit version is 
the installer for the 64-bit version.

A volunteer is welcome to create some other Windows installer for the 64-bit 
captive runtime version.  It could use MSI, or something else, even another AIR 
app.  I just decided to use the same Apache Flex Installer so I wouldn't have 
to figure out some other installer.

HTH,
-Alex

On 7/3/18, 12:32 PM, "Olaf Krueger"  wrote:

Hi,
it works for me on Windows7/64bit.

Just my observations:
- The first warning came up after starting the installer
- After the SDK download has started the second warning came up and after
confirming it the installer closed itself
- After I manually restarted the installer I had to go through the initial
steps again (without warnings) and from this point, it just works!

As already mentioned it is not the best user experience but I think we can
go with it as it is.

I've not followed the entire discussions around the installer issues, so
just for my understanding:
Is the reason for this workaround only to get the Native Installer work in
order to be able to start it from the webpage?
And would work a "standalone captive runtime" version also?

Thank you!!
Olaf





--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd79adfebb90b44bbb67208d5e11bc445%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636662431733449605=APlRWcGzHJ%2F1fTYORNWJI4U8v%2F8HmQ9pvK3CguFVh9E%3D=0

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC2

[Alex Harui]

+1
Package 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.3.2/rc2/apache-flex-sdk-installer-3.3.2-src.tar.gz
Java 1.8
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.12.6
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives: y
No unapproved binaries: y

On 7/3/18, 10:03 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hello,

Release candidate contains fix for issue [1] and changes which allow launch
64-bit Captive Runtime Installer. More information here [2]

In order to test that RC try to install latest Apache Flex SDK with newest
Adobe Air.

Sources can be found:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Finstaller%2F3.3.2%2Frc2%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce643c4e42cf046d83f8d08d5e16b6e82%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636662773889760820=VUI2Bul6Tn%2BO9GnXSp4OMuVE4aSJHxTwVDLhaUTzRdM%3D=0

Binary distributions for Windows and Mac:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Finstaller%2F3.3.2%2Frc2%2Fbinaries%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce643c4e42cf046d83f8d08d5e16b6e82%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636662773889760820=CGeWV7o9ORdcNbMlwwihr4eMWA%2F2D%2Fr3JACQka290Cc%3D=0

Before voting review ASF requirements:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce643c4e42cf046d83f8d08d5e16b6e82%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636662773889760820=fuCH%2BRFx1U8V3%2BTRp5D6AcDkfUO4Hz%2FvZEX6XD%2Bht7Q%3D=0

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Frelease-policy.html%23approving-a-release=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce643c4e42cf046d83f8d08d5e16b6e82%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636662773889760820=qr3tQ23rdSp5Hl46%2FBa88JBdfyYMjLzRe22V1TK0KTc%3D=0

Vote
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

[1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FFLEX-35388=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce643c4e42cf046d83f8d08d5e16b6e82%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636662773889760820=A%2Btxe98Anmb%2FQLinhldf3eut6dDumZCbJ0e4HFnKNBQ%3D=0
[2]

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2FDiscuss-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-3-3-2-RC1-tp65400p65405.html=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce643c4e42cf046d83f8d08d5e16b6e82%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636662773889760820=JY%2FCKZbrwaNwoGDLJzM7TKAgj2EkJVgd7WSh8LRi4v8%3D=0

Thanks,
-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce643c4e42cf046d83f8d08d5e16b6e82%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636662773889760820=W4v8mtfuIXdwa96T9O4998WjoNqNXtM%2Fzj9n8BRnNFk%3D=0

*

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC1*

[Alex Harui]

Yes, but I am concerned that we have not seen feedback from other PMC members.

-Alex

On 7/2/18, 4:57 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Alex,

Can I use your RC2 to start a vote?

Thanks,
Piotr

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018, 12:12 PM Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> Anyone have some spare time to look into the windows build? I would like
> to start a vote etc.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 25 cze 2018 o 18:56 Piotr Zarzycki 
> napisał(a):
>
>> Alex,
>>
>> Thanks! Good to know! I got positive feedback from Stuart off list. He
>> also encountered some problems to sending emails here.
>>
>> Let's see for some feedback from others!
    >>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>>
>> pon., 25 cze 2018 o 18:43 Alex Harui 
>> napisał(a):
>>
>>> The RC2 folders are populated with both source and binary, AFAICT.  We
>>> could just start the vote, but I would like more PMC members to try the
>>> Windows user experience and make sure we are comfortable with the "rough
>>> edges" in the experience that Greg Dove mentioned before we open a new 
vote
>>> thread.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 6/25/18, 6:47 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I couldn't send for some reason any email to this list for past
>>> several
>>> days. I will prepare RC2 with Alex's changes soon.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>>
>>> pt., 22 cze 2018 o 00:07 Vincent Sotto 
>>> napisał(a):
>>>
>>> > Works perfectly win10
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, 3:19 AM urthling 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > RC2 worked for us on Windows too.
>>> > >
>>> > > Excellent, ty Alex.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Sent from:
>>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2931c6607c54453dd1e908d5daa22b0f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636655312397438772=c20uWJi4JKSjme%2FB7I0tjfRlN18bpO51haPgL1tDItI%3D=0
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>
>>> Patreon: *
>>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2931c6607c54453dd1e908d5daa22b0f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636655312397438772=agk9d3yYFzLH5Rakmq%2FjeyQguiAfOMgnC9n8afXFRBI%3D=0
>>> <
>>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2931c6607c54453dd1e908d5daa22b0f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636655312397438772=agk9d3yYFzLH5Rakmq%2FjeyQguiAfOMgnC9n8afXFRBI%3D=0
>>> >*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C650323281d3a49defa1008d5e012eb2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636661294217761473=x7oU13iuqP1WTxX3GjThAuMDdXlw7nRvkBg7%2BSo6%2BHc%3D=0
>> 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C650323281d3a49defa1008d5e012eb2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636661294217761473=x7oU13iuqP1WTxX3GjThAuMDdXlw7nRvkBg7%2BSo6%2BHc%3D=0>*
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C650323281d3a49defa1008d5e012eb2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636661294217771478=sCpTZt1JxpiolssE5M%2FWmoEZ5R%2Bn4YYdIgcpm6ll9oo%3D=0
> 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C650323281d3a49defa1008d5e012eb2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636661294217771478=sCpTZt1JxpiolssE5M%2FWmoEZ5R%2Bn4YYdIgcpm6ll9oo%3D=0>*
>

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC1*

[Alex Harui]

The RC2 folders are populated with both source and binary, AFAICT.  We could 
just start the vote, but I would like more PMC members to try the Windows user 
experience and make sure we are comfortable with the "rough edges" in the 
experience that Greg Dove mentioned before we open a new vote thread.

Thanks,
-Alex 

On 6/25/18, 6:47 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

I couldn't send for some reason any email to this list for past several
days. I will prepare RC2 with Alex's changes soon.

Thanks,
Piotr

pt., 22 cze 2018 o 00:07 Vincent Sotto  napisał(a):

> Works perfectly win10
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, 3:19 AM urthling  wrote:
>
> > RC2 worked for us on Windows too.
> >
> > Excellent, ty Alex.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2931c6607c54453dd1e908d5daa22b0f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636655312397438772=c20uWJi4JKSjme%2FB7I0tjfRlN18bpO51haPgL1tDItI%3D=0
> >
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2931c6607c54453dd1e908d5daa22b0f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636655312397438772=agk9d3yYFzLH5Rakmq%2FjeyQguiAfOMgnC9n8afXFRBI%3D=0

*

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC1*

[Alex Harui]

Hi Greg,

Thanks for trying it.  Good to know that it works.

I don't know that we will ship it like this.  I first wanted to make sure it 
actually worked and get some folks to experience it so we can consider how much 
time we want to spend to "reduce friction".  The app knows it is 64-bit because 
we modify the -app.xml file.  I also noticed that System.totalMemory is larger 
in the 64-bit app.  So the 64-bit version could have a different UI or 
background color or something if that will help.  Right now, the only 
difference is that it says "64-bit" in the log.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 6/20/18, 6:04 PM, "Greg Dove"  wrote:

I just gave it a try (Win 10).

It's definitely not without some friction, but it works!

I think I did not realize that it had launched the downloaded 64 bit
version so I did exit and relaunch from 32 bit again before I 'got' it.
Anyhow I installed 4.16.1/Air 30 sdk sucessfully with it.

Observations:
It also did have a weird startup window position where it was spanning
monitors and had a vertical offset in my multi-monitor setup when launched
(which may be something new or may be because I have a new setup and this
is the first time I am using the installer on it) but that is just a simple
matter of moving the window.

I saw a couple of Norton warnings along the way, including one for the
downloaded 64 bit version missing a valid signature.


On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:14 AM Alex Harui 
wrote:

> Can some folks on Windows try this version of the Installer?  You will
> need to uninstall the current Installer first.
>
>
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Finstaller%2F3.3.2%2Frc2%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-3.3.2-bin.exe=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca2a00948fa034d41347908d5d712f2b4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636651398740578723=ju2qA9MiyxATP8PxqczVZNu1%2BidUHZGmraGjLepUkM8%3D=0
>
> In theory, this will install the 32-bit installer which will warn you it
> will upgrade to the 64-bit installer then warn you that it will launch the
> 64-bit installer and close the 32-bit Installer.  And then, installing 
with
> the 64-bit installer should actually work.
>
    > Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 6/19/18, 11:38 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>
> I think we're just plain running out of memory in 32-bit Windows.
>
> AFAICT, you still can't build a 64-bit Windows Native Installer even
> with AIR 30.  I think we want a Native Installer so that it can be 
launched
> from our website and we don't have to write some other installer.
>
> So today, I tried a trick where I taught the 32-bit installer to
> download and launch a 64-bit Captive Runtime Installer.  It works locally,
> so I pushed the changes so I can try it on Mac to make sure I didn't break
> anything.  The build changed to generate both a 32-bit Native Installer 
and
> a 64-bit Captive Runtime on Windows.
>
> It isn't a great user experience but it seemed easier than trying to
> implement some other 64-bit Captive Runtime Installer.  The 32-bit Native
> Installer knows how to create shortcuts in the Windows Start Menu.  Each
> time you run the Windows version of the Installer, it will put up an Alert
> saying it will launch the 64-bit version and close.  If someone wants to
> make a better experience, feel free.
>
> In the next RC, we'll need to post both the 32-bit Native and 64-bit
> Captive and update sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml to point to the 64-bit
> Captive.  To test locally, you can use the command-iine argument
> -64-bit=file:///C:/
>
> I think I'm out of time for tonight so will test Mac tomorrow.  Others
> are welcome to jump in.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 6/19/18, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>
> I see that too on Windows.  Mac seems ok.  Looking into it.
>
> On 6/18/18, 4:25 PM, "extraordinaryalien" 
> wrote:
>
> Having issues on Windows - here's the log (at least we're able
> to pull FLEX
> :p):
>
> Installer version 3.3.2 (windows)
> Using Locale: en_US
> Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
> SDK version Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1
> AIR version 30.0
> Flash Player version 30.0
> Creating Apache Flex home
> Creating temporary directory
>

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC1*

[Alex Harui]

Can some folks on Windows try this version of the Installer?  You will need to 
uninstall the current Installer first.

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.3.2/rc2/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-installer-3.3.2-bin.exe

In theory, this will install the 32-bit installer which will warn you it will 
upgrade to the 64-bit installer then warn you that it will launch the 64-bit 
installer and close the 32-bit Installer.  And then, installing with the 64-bit 
installer should actually work.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 6/19/18, 11:38 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

I think we're just plain running out of memory in 32-bit Windows.

AFAICT, you still can't build a 64-bit Windows Native Installer even with 
AIR 30.  I think we want a Native Installer so that it can be launched from our 
website and we don't have to write some other installer.

So today, I tried a trick where I taught the 32-bit installer to download 
and launch a 64-bit Captive Runtime Installer.  It works locally, so I pushed 
the changes so I can try it on Mac to make sure I didn't break anything.  The 
build changed to generate both a 32-bit Native Installer and a 64-bit Captive 
Runtime on Windows.

It isn't a great user experience but it seemed easier than trying to 
implement some other 64-bit Captive Runtime Installer.  The 32-bit Native 
Installer knows how to create shortcuts in the Windows Start Menu.  Each time 
you run the Windows version of the Installer, it will put up an Alert saying it 
will launch the 64-bit version and close.  If someone wants to make a better 
experience, feel free.

In the next RC, we'll need to post both the 32-bit Native and 64-bit 
Captive and update sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml to point to the 64-bit Captive. 
 To test locally, you can use the command-iine argument 
-64-bit=file:///C:/

I think I'm out of time for tonight so will test Mac tomorrow.  Others are 
welcome to jump in.

HTH,
-Alex

On 6/19/18, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

I see that too on Windows.  Mac seems ok.  Looking into it.

On 6/18/18, 4:25 PM, "extraordinaryalien"  
wrote:

Having issues on Windows - here's the log (at least we're able to 
pull FLEX
:p):

Installer version 3.3.2 (windows)
Using Locale: en_US
Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
SDK version Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1
AIR version 30.0
Flash Player version 30.0
Creating Apache Flex home
Creating temporary directory
Downloading Apache Flex SDK from:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache.cs.utah.edu%2Fflex%2F4.16.1%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin.zip=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C126875e8c9314db9740408d5d572cfe6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636649611450867090=DM4brfWC%2FpUxUvI9QFvY3mFLCHAcgc8OBQpeQrUcPc0%3D=0
Verifying Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature
The Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature of the downloaded files matches 
the
reference. The file is valid.
Uncompressing:

C:\Users\stho...@beyondconnect.com\Documents\Flex\temp\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin.zip
Finished uncompressing:

C:\Users\stho...@beyondconnect.com\Documents\Flex\temp\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin.zip
Downloading Adobe AIR Runtime Kit for Windows from:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fairdownload.adobe.com%2Fair%2Fwin%2Fdownload%2F30.0%2F%2FAdobeAIRSDK.zip=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C126875e8c9314db9740408d5d572cfe6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636649611450867090=ATzeaOFv0QE4%2BhqX%2BuJABWZuptcGyp14xnhJQFTyo2w%3D=0
Error #1000
Error: Error #1000
at flash.net::URLLoader/onComplete()
Installation aborted:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Ftrack-installer.html%3Ffailure%3Dtrue%26label%3DApache=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C126875e8c9314db9740408d5d572cfe6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636649611450867090=54fWb75HZ8hhqKWW6gViJATYmpB%2Bffmnt945kwsJxhE%3D=0
 Flex
SDK 
4.16.1=4.16.1=windows=3.3.2=Error #1000
Error: Error #1000
at flash.net::URLLoader/onComplete()




Attempting to pull AIR 29 right now - also trying on MAC





--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C126875e8c9314db9740408d5d572cfe6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636649611450867090=FCmTvhVglrw9sueF7LgzA2R3Z85z5%2BDKmGL7SiyvrvA%3D=0

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC1*

[Alex Harui]

I think we're just plain running out of memory in 32-bit Windows.

AFAICT, you still can't build a 64-bit Windows Native Installer even with AIR 
30.  I think we want a Native Installer so that it can be launched from our 
website and we don't have to write some other installer.

So today, I tried a trick where I taught the 32-bit installer to download and 
launch a 64-bit Captive Runtime Installer.  It works locally, so I pushed the 
changes so I can try it on Mac to make sure I didn't break anything.  The build 
changed to generate both a 32-bit Native Installer and a 64-bit Captive Runtime 
on Windows.

It isn't a great user experience but it seemed easier than trying to implement 
some other 64-bit Captive Runtime Installer.  The 32-bit Native Installer knows 
how to create shortcuts in the Windows Start Menu.  Each time you run the 
Windows version of the Installer, it will put up an Alert saying it will launch 
the 64-bit version and close.  If someone wants to make a better experience, 
feel free.

In the next RC, we'll need to post both the 32-bit Native and 64-bit Captive 
and update sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml to point to the 64-bit Captive.  To 
test locally, you can use the command-iine argument -64-bit=file:///C:/

I think I'm out of time for tonight so will test Mac tomorrow.  Others are 
welcome to jump in.

HTH,
-Alex

On 6/19/18, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

I see that too on Windows.  Mac seems ok.  Looking into it.

On 6/18/18, 4:25 PM, "extraordinaryalien"  wrote:

Having issues on Windows - here's the log (at least we're able to pull 
FLEX
:p):

Installer version 3.3.2 (windows)
Using Locale: en_US
Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
SDK version Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1
AIR version 30.0
Flash Player version 30.0
Creating Apache Flex home
Creating temporary directory
Downloading Apache Flex SDK from:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache.cs.utah.edu%2Fflex%2F4.16.1%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin.zip=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C126875e8c9314db9740408d5d572cfe6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636649611450867090=DM4brfWC%2FpUxUvI9QFvY3mFLCHAcgc8OBQpeQrUcPc0%3D=0
Verifying Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature
The Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature of the downloaded files matches the
reference. The file is valid.
Uncompressing:

C:\Users\stho...@beyondconnect.com\Documents\Flex\temp\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin.zip
Finished uncompressing:

C:\Users\stho...@beyondconnect.com\Documents\Flex\temp\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin.zip
Downloading Adobe AIR Runtime Kit for Windows from:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fairdownload.adobe.com%2Fair%2Fwin%2Fdownload%2F30.0%2F%2FAdobeAIRSDK.zip=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C126875e8c9314db9740408d5d572cfe6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636649611450867090=ATzeaOFv0QE4%2BhqX%2BuJABWZuptcGyp14xnhJQFTyo2w%3D=0
Error #1000
Error: Error #1000
at flash.net::URLLoader/onComplete()
Installation aborted:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Ftrack-installer.html%3Ffailure%3Dtrue%26label%3DApache=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C126875e8c9314db9740408d5d572cfe6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636649611450867090=54fWb75HZ8hhqKWW6gViJATYmpB%2Bffmnt945kwsJxhE%3D=0
 Flex
SDK 4.16.1=4.16.1=windows=3.3.2=Error 
#1000
Error: Error #1000
at flash.net::URLLoader/onComplete()




Attempting to pull AIR 29 right now - also trying on MAC





--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C126875e8c9314db9740408d5d572cfe6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636649611450867090=FCmTvhVglrw9sueF7LgzA2R3Z85z5%2BDKmGL7SiyvrvA%3D=0

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC1*

[Alex Harui]

I see that too on Windows.  Mac seems ok.  Looking into it.

On 6/18/18, 4:25 PM, "extraordinaryalien"  wrote:

Having issues on Windows - here's the log (at least we're able to pull FLEX
:p):

Installer version 3.3.2 (windows)
Using Locale: en_US
Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
SDK version Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1
AIR version 30.0
Flash Player version 30.0
Creating Apache Flex home
Creating temporary directory
Downloading Apache Flex SDK from:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache.cs.utah.edu%2Fflex%2F4.16.1%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin.zip=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C126875e8c9314db9740408d5d572cfe6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636649611450867090=DM4brfWC%2FpUxUvI9QFvY3mFLCHAcgc8OBQpeQrUcPc0%3D=0
Verifying Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature
The Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature of the downloaded files matches the
reference. The file is valid.
Uncompressing:

C:\Users\stho...@beyondconnect.com\Documents\Flex\temp\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin.zip
Finished uncompressing:

C:\Users\stho...@beyondconnect.com\Documents\Flex\temp\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin.zip
Downloading Adobe AIR Runtime Kit for Windows from:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fairdownload.adobe.com%2Fair%2Fwin%2Fdownload%2F30.0%2F%2FAdobeAIRSDK.zip=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C126875e8c9314db9740408d5d572cfe6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636649611450867090=ATzeaOFv0QE4%2BhqX%2BuJABWZuptcGyp14xnhJQFTyo2w%3D=0
Error #1000
Error: Error #1000
at flash.net::URLLoader/onComplete()
Installation aborted:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Ftrack-installer.html%3Ffailure%3Dtrue%26label%3DApache=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C126875e8c9314db9740408d5d572cfe6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636649611450867090=54fWb75HZ8hhqKWW6gViJATYmpB%2Bffmnt945kwsJxhE%3D=0
 Flex
SDK 4.16.1=4.16.1=windows=3.3.2=Error #1000
Error: Error #1000
at flash.net::URLLoader/onComplete()




Attempting to pull AIR 29 right now - also trying on MAC





--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C126875e8c9314db9740408d5d572cfe6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636649611450867090=FCmTvhVglrw9sueF7LgzA2R3Z85z5%2BDKmGL7SiyvrvA%3D=0

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Hi Piotr,

I did my testing on Mac.  This error implies you are not using AIR SDK 30 when 
compiling.  Probably you are using something older, maybe even 29.

-Alex

On 6/17/18, 5:29 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi Guys,

Today I was trying to prepare RC1 and I have strange error on Mac. Not sure
why. [1] Can someone build on their machine and tell me whether there is
the same issue. On Windows I got release build without the problem!

[java] /Users/piotr/Downloads/flex-utilities/flex-installer/installer/src/
InstallApacheFlex-app.xml: error 102: Invalid namespace 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8299aa9c42a413413cd08d5d44dea58%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636648353485972207=IJstojC9VcwUIwyzA11RG2uviXK13wJPFiKrPUkIfL0%3D=0
air/application/30.0

[1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FnW9L=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8299aa9c42a413413cd08d5d44dea58%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636648353485972207=9y86uCw6ZoaCQ52oD8wN4Hc%2BraU1qubjAQYtiyY1pbE%3D=0

Thanks,
Piotr

pt., 15 cze 2018 o 20:56 hferreira  napisał(a):

> BUILD SUCCESSFUL
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8299aa9c42a413413cd08d5d44dea58%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636648353485972207=jFL2kYxGt%2B%2Bk8pr9LKrXflSY3H7MvEcfsRKqjuffSWo%3D=0
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8299aa9c42a413413cd08d5d44dea58%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636648353485972207=UVPho2y7eJ53aNmHLapVEkxndPkHtlkU0tCBxIiP7iE%3D=0

*

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Hi,

Hit this link:  http://flex.apache.org/installer/properties/sdk/en_US.properties
Search for sourceforge.  The urls should now be https.  If not, refresh the 
browser, clear the browser cache, etc.

Then try it again.

HTH,
-Alex

On 6/15/18, 10:52 AM, "hferreira"  wrote:

C:\SDK\apache-ant-1.10.3\bin>ant -f
c:\sdk\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin\installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=30.0
-Dflash.sdk.version=30.0
Buildfile: c:\sdk\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin\installer.xml
  [get] Getting:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fproperties%2Fsdk%2Fen_US.properties=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca871b9f5f2fb46bec3e808d5d2e8b293%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636646819221565850=9DePx1%2Fc3dAsS2s7D77%2B%2FAyHcMzG3MCkuCGruTYqYr4%3D=0
  [get] To: c:\sdk\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin\en_US.properties

get-data:
  [get] Getting:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fsdk-installer-config-4.0.xml%3Fts%3D201806151843=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca871b9f5f2fb46bec3e808d5d2e8b293%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636646819221565850=75nhr4n%2BlXS6seeebineyxC7nlqXbPQ9%2B9vZDJl6zIU%3D=0
  [get] To:
c:\sdk\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin\sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml

get-air-md5-data:

get-flash-md5-data:

get-md5-data:

check-binary:

ask-air:
[input] Apache Flex SDK uses the Adobe AIR SDK to build Adobe AIR
applications.
[input] The Adobe AIR SDK is subject to and governed by the
[input] Adobe AIR SDK License Agreement specified here:
[input] http://www.adobe.com/products/air/sdk-eula.html.
[input] This license is not compatible with the Apache v2 license.
[input] Do you want to download and install the Adobe AIR SDK? (y, [n])
y

ask-flash:
[input] Apache Flex SDK uses the Adobe Flash Player's playerglobal.swc
to build Adobe Flash applications.
[input]
[input] The playerglobal.swc file is subject to and governed by the
[input] Adobe Flex SDK License Agreement specified here:
[input]

http://www.adobe.com/products/eulas/pdfs/adobe_flex_software_development_kit-combined-20110916_0930.pdf,
[input] By downloading, modifying, distributing, using and/or accessing
the playerglobal.swc file
[input] you agree to the terms and conditions of the applicable end user
license agreement.
[input]
[input] In addition to the Adobe license terms, you also agree to be
bound by the third-party terms specified here:
[input] http://www.adobe.com/products/eula/third_party/.
[input] Adobe recommends that you review these third-party terms.
[input]
[input] This license is not compatible with the Apache v2 license.
[input] Do you want to download and install the playerglobal.swc? (y,
[n])
y

ask-swfobject:

ask-ofl:

ask-adobe-osmf:

ask-adobe-fontswf:
[input] Apache Flex can optionally integrate with Adobe's embedded font
support.
[input] This feature requires a few font jars from the Adobe Flex SDK.
[input] The Adobe SDK license agreement for Adobe Flex 4.6 applies to
these jars.
[input] This license is not compatible with the Apache v2 license.
[input]
[input] Adobe Flex SDK License Agreement:
[input]
[input] All files contained in this Adobe Flex SDK download are subject
to and governed by the
[input] Adobe Flex SDK License Agreement specified here:
[input]

http://www.adobe.com/products/eulas/pdfs/adobe_flex_software_development_kit-combined-20110916_0930.pdf,
[input] By downloading, modifying, distributing, using and/or accessing
any files in this Adobe Flex SDK,
[input] you agree to the terms and conditions of the applicable end user
license agreement.
[input]
[input] In addition to the Adobe license terms, you also agree to be
bound by the third-party terms specified here: 
[input] http://www.adobe.com/products/eula/third_party/.
[input] Adobe recommends that you review these third-party terms.
[input]
[input] Do you want to install this jar from the Adobe Flex SDK? (y,
[n])
y

ask-licenses:

air-check:

air-download:
[mkdir] Created dir: c:\sdk\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin\in
  [get] Getting:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fproperties%2Fsdk%2Fen_US.properties=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca871b9f5f2fb46bec3e808d5d2e8b293%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636646819221565850=9DePx1%2Fc3dAsS2s7D77%2B%2FAyHcMzG3MCkuCGruTYqYr4%3D=0
  [get] To: 

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-utilities] [refs/heads/develop] - switch to AIR 30 so we can use TLSSocket against TLS1.2. Replace the as3crypto TLSSocket with our own that uses AIR 30 SecureSocket

[Alex Harui]

Original code links.

https://github.com/timkurvers/as3-crypto/blob/master/src/com/hurlant/crypto/tls/TLSSocket.as
https://github.com/timkurvers/as3-crypto/blob/master/src/com/hurlant/util/Base64.as


-Alex

On 6/15/18, 9:00 AM, "Justin Mclean"  wrote:

Hi,

I don’t believe this is the correct way to handle this ie by replacing the 
3rd party headers with ASF even though changes have been made. Can you point me 
to the original code?

Changes to 3rd party files are generally made under the original license 
and changes need to be major before adding an ASF header. You might want to 
read this [1] that come up on the incubator general list recently about the 
same issue. Also are you including the full text of the BSD license anywhere 
(perhaps it’s in another check in and I missed it) as that is required by the 
BSD license?

Thanks,
Justin

1. 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread.html%2F111ce40196f4f81c9b394fc7399298f72f7afc8d3cc144ed0f6320cc%40%253Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%253E=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C764ba1298ee742d343b308d5d2d919d5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636646752235329806=TVAjCOaT1QHZ2prdJ9vo8wILWxOs2%2BYoZuywCnIKraU%3D=0

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Done.

On 6/15/18, 12:30 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Alex,

Can you add to jira installer version 3.3.1 and 3.3.2?

pt., 15 cze 2018 o 09:25 Piotr Zarzycki 
napisał(a):

> Ok! Thank you I will try to prepare everything soon.
>
> pt., 15 cze 2018 o 09:23 Alex Harui  napisał(a):
>
>> Hi Piotr,
>>
>> You are welcome to be the Release Manager.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 6/15/18, 12:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> I just build installer with Air 30 and it's working perfectly! Do you
>> want
>> me to start release process or you will handle that ?
    >>
>> I have tested on Windows 10.
>>
>> Thank you!!
>>
>> pt., 15 cze 2018 o 08:09 Alex Harui 
>> napisał(a):
>>
>> > Try using Apache Ant.
>> >
>> > Get the Flex binary and unpack it into a folder.
>> >
>> > In that folder, run:
>> >
>> >   ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=30.0
>> -Dflash.sdk.version=30.0
>> >
>> > HTH,
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> > On 6/14/18, 7:32 PM, "hferreira"  wrote:
>> >
>> > Can any one provide me a zip file for Windows of Flex 4.16.1 +
>> AIR 30
>> > (or
>> > older version and then I can overlay) + Adobe Embedded Fonts
>> Library
>> > (on
>> > other words all options from installer) ?
>> >
>> > Or better, explain me how to do.
>> > I can grab Flex binaries from here:
>> >
>> >
>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Fflex%2F4.16.1%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin.zip=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f33c3927571400ae39d08d5d26836d1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636646267394189237=qYD2Lrb2zM%2FKU0k3y7PNnsEYACVz215l5G3uncDlH%2B0%3D=0
>> > I can grab AIR 30 SDK from here:
>> >
>> >
>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.adobe.com%2Fdevnet%2Fair%2Fair-sdk-download.html=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f33c3927571400ae39d08d5d26836d1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636646267394189237=7ZDtB8BhuNj2XdoTm2aWRLhDUC4q8CZdiQ64pQrYeuk%3D=0
>> > Than I can copy AIR 30 SDK content to Flex folder.
>> >
>> > But I don't know here to grab Adobe Embedded Fonts Library to I
>> also
>> > need
>> > for Flat Spark.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Hugo.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent from:
>> >
>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f33c3927571400ae39d08d5d26836d1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636646267394189237=SHdlXOmwHf9XoE5BPC9CwOWAIFRcaEZme5apDp8uUgE%3D=0
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: *
>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C92354d074b22428735d208d5d29080be%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636646440433201491=EtnRhEyZiaPbeaw9REDMCgzcRueRyUibe7MJVE06Sy0%3D=0
>> <
>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C92354d074b22428735d208d5d29080be%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636646440433201491=EtnRhEyZiaPbeaw9REDMCgzcRueRyUibe7MJVE06Sy0%3D=0
>> >*
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1e40370363e54be9996708d5d291e0f4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636646446367908763=nB0Qk1LVr6Ul8p%2FeO9YvEPzwqcf34X%2FDKFdlqi%2FpLCE%3D=0
> 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40ad

Re: Board report time !

[Alex Harui]

Yeah, I will see if I can get the reporter.a.o folks to clean that up.  June 20 
is the date of the meeting.   I think it is a convention that reports are due a 
week early.  I always see lots of reports trickle in at the last minute, but it 
helps the board to have a week to review reports before the meeting.

You should have seen an email from Phil Steitz remininding us that the report 
was due on the 13th.

HTH,
-Alex

On 6/15/18, 2:17 AM, "Tom Chiverton"  wrote:

This may have been a misunderstanding on my part.

I've been going off

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freporter.apache.org%2F%3Fflex%23tab_flex=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cbbd3130f2c9a487faf8f08d5d2a0dbdf%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636646510684112404=Jb66mR9IYdHpS1CX6vgEK%2Bfp2OgALOPMbzCiDO4s5lo%3D=0
which has the "next report date" of 20th.

Tom


    On 14/06/18 17:01, Alex Harui wrote:
> Sounds reasonable, but I'm pretty sure the deadline was yesterday.  The 
meeting is a week from now and we're supposed to have the report filed a week 
in front.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 6/14/18, 1:34 AM, "Tom Chiverton"  wrote:
>
>  On the deadline ( a week from now ) I copy and paste from the Wiki to
>  the Apache reporting tools.
>  Apache also remind me to do this, so it's difficult to miss.
>  
>  I don't see a need to copy this to the mailing lists, because it's
>  available on the public wiki anyway.
>  If we did want to communicate the final version, why would this need 
to
>  be sent to private@ rather than dev@ or user@ ?
>  
>  Tom
>  
>  
>  On 13/06/18 17:20, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
>  > Hi Tom,
>  >
>  > Are you sending directly to the board that report?
>  >
>  > Could you include also private list? I don't follow board list in 
general
>  > and would love to know that report was sent.
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > Piotr
>  >
>  > On Sat, Jun 9, 2018, 8:07 AM Piotr Zarzycki 

>  > wrote:
>  >
>  >> Hi Tom,
>  >>
>  >> I did update dates of release latest installer.
>  >>
>  >> In the Activity section I propose to write that we are active 
around bug
>  >> fixing, especially in the installer. We would like to continue to 
provide
>  >> smooth download experience in case of Flex. We are providing 
constant help
>  >> to the users on the list.
>  >>
>  >> Thoughts?
>  >>
>  >> Thanks,
>  >> Piotr
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> wt., 29 maj 2018 o 20:58 Tom Chiverton  
napisał(a):
>  >>
>  >>> Iin the next few weeks we have to give one of our periodic 
updates to the
>  >>> Apache board on what we've been up to.
>  >>>
>  >>> Please take a look at
>  >>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FFLEX%2FJune=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3b690f7b5ae8484260a908d5d1d1a248%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636645620669918695=eNwhc1GLu6WUCEHVYBgIOCJka0az%2BDiL5mfBJabOshI%3D=0
>  >>>
>  >>> And (start !) adding things that have changed since last quarter 
- I've
>  >>> put
>  >>> some basic sub titles in already.
>  >>> --
>  >>> Tom
>  >>> Apache Flex
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >> --
>  >>
>  >> Piotr Zarzycki
>  >>
>  >> Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3b690f7b5ae8484260a908d5d1d1a248%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636645620669918695=kWp%2Bf12weT6qHP%2BqxCeTM0jntyJikM1OWAPWhEL%2BiCo%3D=0
>  >> 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3b690f7b5ae8484260a908d5d1d1a248%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C63664562066991869

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Try hitting this link: 
http://flex.apache.org/installer/sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml
Search for mac.29.0 or win.29.0 and see if the URLs are set to https.  If not, 
refresh the browser, clear the cache and try again.  I see https there.

Then try again and provide the entire console output if there is an error.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 6/15/18, 5:42 AM, "hferreira"  wrote:

Installed JAVA + ANT (first time).

Tried ANT (first time) with AIR 30.0 but failed.
Next tried with AIR 29.0 (for later overlap to AIR 30.0).

First I got a warning about: Unable to locate tools.jar. Expected to find it
in c:\Program Files\java\jre1.8.0_171\lib\tools.jar but the build continued.

I got the questions step by step and at the very end I got:
c:\sdk\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin\installer.xml:970: Redirection detected
from http to https. Protocol switch unsafe, not allowed.

Seems related with the issues about the Flex SDK Installer GUI that you
folks are talking about.



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce55e63f8d864442de4308d5d2bd649b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636646633236955185=bl66XspF8Awr9mt6DV3Htu1lIwBxCh5XkUdqekDJZFg%3D=0

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Hi Piotr,

You are welcome to be the Release Manager.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 6/15/18, 12:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi Alex,

I just build installer with Air 30 and it's working perfectly! Do you want
me to start release process or you will handle that ?

I have tested on Windows 10.

Thank you!!

pt., 15 cze 2018 o 08:09 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> Try using Apache Ant.
>
> Get the Flex binary and unpack it into a folder.
>
> In that folder, run:
>
>   ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=30.0 -Dflash.sdk.version=30.0
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 6/14/18, 7:32 PM, "hferreira"  wrote:
>
> Can any one provide me a zip file for Windows of Flex 4.16.1 + AIR 30
> (or
> older version and then I can overlay) + Adobe Embedded Fonts Library
> (on
> other words all options from installer) ?
>
> Or better, explain me how to do.
> I can grab Flex binaries from here:
>
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Fflex%2F4.16.1%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin.zip=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f33c3927571400ae39d08d5d26836d1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636646267394189237=qYD2Lrb2zM%2FKU0k3y7PNnsEYACVz215l5G3uncDlH%2B0%3D=0
> I can grab AIR 30 SDK from here:
>
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.adobe.com%2Fdevnet%2Fair%2Fair-sdk-download.html=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f33c3927571400ae39d08d5d26836d1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636646267394189237=7ZDtB8BhuNj2XdoTm2aWRLhDUC4q8CZdiQ64pQrYeuk%3D=0
> Than I can copy AIR 30 SDK content to Flex folder.
>
> But I don't know here to grab Adobe Embedded Fonts Library to I also
> need
> for Flat Spark.
>
> Thank you,
> Hugo.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f33c3927571400ae39d08d5d26836d1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636646267394189237=SHdlXOmwHf9XoE5BPC9CwOWAIFRcaEZme5apDp8uUgE%3D=0
>
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C92354d074b22428735d208d5d29080be%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636646440433201491=EtnRhEyZiaPbeaw9REDMCgzcRueRyUibe7MJVE06Sy0%3D=0

<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C92354d074b22428735d208d5d29080be%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636646440433201491=EtnRhEyZiaPbeaw9REDMCgzcRueRyUibe7MJVE06Sy0%3D=0>*

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Try using Apache Ant.  

Get the Flex binary and unpack it into a folder.

In that folder, run:

  ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=30.0 -Dflash.sdk.version=30.0

HTH,
-Alex

On 6/14/18, 7:32 PM, "hferreira"  wrote:

Can any one provide me a zip file for Windows of Flex 4.16.1 + AIR 30 (or
older version and then I can overlay) + Adobe Embedded Fonts Library (on
other words all options from installer) ?

Or better, explain me how to do.
I can grab Flex binaries from here:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua%2Fflex%2F4.16.1%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin.zip=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f33c3927571400ae39d08d5d26836d1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636646267394189237=qYD2Lrb2zM%2FKU0k3y7PNnsEYACVz215l5G3uncDlH%2B0%3D=0
I can grab AIR 30 SDK from here:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.adobe.com%2Fdevnet%2Fair%2Fair-sdk-download.html=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f33c3927571400ae39d08d5d26836d1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636646267394189237=7ZDtB8BhuNj2XdoTm2aWRLhDUC4q8CZdiQ64pQrYeuk%3D=0
Than I can copy AIR 30 SDK content to Flex folder.

But I don't know here to grab Adobe Embedded Fonts Library to I also need
for Flat Spark.

Thank you,
Hugo.



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f33c3927571400ae39d08d5d26836d1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636646267394189237=SHdlXOmwHf9XoE5BPC9CwOWAIFRcaEZme5apDp8uUgE%3D=0

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

I just pushed changes that replace the as3crypto TLSSocket with one that uses 
AIR 30 SecureSocket.  This seems to fix the installer and should allow the 
installer to fetch over HTTPS from other servers as earlier TLS versions go 
away.

I asked my colleagues on the AIR team and they say that SecureSocket is not 
dependent on IE settings so it shouldn't return us to having those problems 
again.

Can another committer build from sources and see if it works for them?  You 
will need to use AIR30.  You can use AIR29 if you update the -app.xml, but 
TLS1.2 is not supported before AIR29.

Let us know if it works.
-Alex

On 6/13/18, 8:48 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

Hi, there was a more recent comment from Infra that Apache no longer 
supports TLS1.0 (and TLS1.1) per security recommendations.  I suspect the code 
we are using relies on TLS1.0.  I wrote a simple test harness this morning and 
we cannot access any files on 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.a.o%2Fdist=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C21718da7984f4c7afc1408d5d1451870%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636645017047686321=qRM%2FV9wqea%2Fg3NWzZ7xgYnNtaOodkrRMTJ6%2FJZmeYCs%3D=0
 over HTTPS, but we can on fpdownloads.macromedia.com.  If you have a server 
that no longer supports TLS1.0, I can post the example and you can try it on 
that server and see if the code gets stuck there as well.

So this means that if some day Adobe also drops TLS1.0 support (which it 
should) then this same code will start to fail to download the Adobe code.

I've been unable to figure out from our archives why we chose to use our 
own HTTPS handling code in the first place.  Does anybody remember?  I seem to 
recall we had lots of failures downloading third-party files.  There was also 
an issue with AIR relying on IE settings on Windows.  I'm trying to understand 
if we switch to using AIR's SecureSocket for TLS support whether that also uses 
IE settings.

I think my next step is to try to find sources for the current code and see 
where it gets stuck.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 6/13/18, 12:27 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

FYI, I just tried suggestion from Henk in infra comments and it's 
failed as
well.

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 12 cze 2018 o 09:28 Piotr Zarzycki 
napisał(a):

> Ok Let's wait to their answer. Thanks!
>
> wt., 12 cze 2018 o 09:19 Alex Harui  
napisał(a):
>
>> I decided to ask Infra 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-16640=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C333a36f4a7f84a07e3a908d5d0ff12c7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636644716304449784=9k3t3GcBqURaNt5M5v6pIawviZx%2F4DnkJ5h4m9BAo9s%3D=0
>>
>> I also saw this:
>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblog.pcisecuritystandards.org%2Fare-you-ready-for-30-june-2018-sayin-goodbye-to-ssl-early-tls=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C333a36f4a7f84a07e3a908d5d0ff12c7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636644716304449784=kymNLcXx0IihC6pdzrNLoGSdHPEc86ckVpzJwXN3DcM%3D=0
>>
>> I'm wondering if the HTTPS code in the installer can handle the 
latest
>> TLS.  The notes for the code we use says "partial TLS1.0 
implementation".
>>
    >> Thoughts?
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 6/11/18, 9:43 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>>
>> Because Rawgit could be a faster remedy than putting together a 
whole
>> new release.
>>
>> However, before we go that route, we need to verify that the
>> Installer can in fact download over HTTPS from the rawgit server.  My
>> understanding from this thread is that HTTPS may be working on some 
servers
>> but not others?
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 6/11/18, 9:03 PM, "Justin Mclean" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Do we really want to go with a service that states "this is a
>> free service,
>> so there are no uptime or support guarantees.". I not sure we
>> even have an
>> issue with downloading the binary connivance releases so why 
do
>> we need to
>> move them from where they currently are?
>>
>> Justin
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:05 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
>> bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>

Re: Board report time !

[Alex Harui]

Sounds reasonable, but I'm pretty sure the deadline was yesterday.  The meeting 
is a week from now and we're supposed to have the report filed a week in front.

HTH,
-Alex

On 6/14/18, 1:34 AM, "Tom Chiverton"  wrote:

On the deadline ( a week from now ) I copy and paste from the Wiki to 
the Apache reporting tools.
Apache also remind me to do this, so it's difficult to miss.

I don't see a need to copy this to the mailing lists, because it's 
available on the public wiki anyway.
If we did want to communicate the final version, why would this need to 
be sent to private@ rather than dev@ or user@ ?

Tom


On 13/06/18 17:20, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Are you sending directly to the board that report?
>
> Could you include also private list? I don't follow board list in general
> and would love to know that report was sent.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2018, 8:07 AM Piotr Zarzycki 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> I did update dates of release latest installer.
>>
>> In the Activity section I propose to write that we are active around bug
>> fixing, especially in the installer. We would like to continue to provide
>> smooth download experience in case of Flex. We are providing constant 
help
>> to the users on the list.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>>
>> wt., 29 maj 2018 o 20:58 Tom Chiverton  napisał(a):
>>
>>> Iin the next few weeks we have to give one of our periodic updates to 
the
>>> Apache board on what we've been up to.
>>>
>>> Please take a look at
>>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FFLEX%2FJune=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3b690f7b5ae8484260a908d5d1d1a248%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636645620669918695=eNwhc1GLu6WUCEHVYBgIOCJka0az%2BDiL5mfBJabOshI%3D=0
>>>
>>> And (start !) adding things that have changed since last quarter - I've
>>> put
>>> some basic sub titles in already.
>>> --
>>> Tom
>>> Apache Flex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3b690f7b5ae8484260a908d5d1d1a248%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636645620669918695=kWp%2Bf12weT6qHP%2BqxCeTM0jntyJikM1OWAPWhEL%2BiCo%3D=0
>> 
*
>>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.symanteccloud.com=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3b690f7b5ae8484260a908d5d1d1a248%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636645620669918695=he9fQgpRn0SIkBdhVPLU8CwdhdxoPi3OEgv9X7DC%2B4I%3D=0
> __

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Hi, there was a more recent comment from Infra that Apache no longer supports 
TLS1.0 (and TLS1.1) per security recommendations.  I suspect the code we are 
using relies on TLS1.0.  I wrote a simple test harness this morning and we 
cannot access any files on www.a.o/dist over HTTPS, but we can on 
fpdownloads.macromedia.com.  If you have a server that no longer supports 
TLS1.0, I can post the example and you can try it on that server and see if the 
code gets stuck there as well.

So this means that if some day Adobe also drops TLS1.0 support (which it 
should) then this same code will start to fail to download the Adobe code.

I've been unable to figure out from our archives why we chose to use our own 
HTTPS handling code in the first place.  Does anybody remember?  I seem to 
recall we had lots of failures downloading third-party files.  There was also 
an issue with AIR relying on IE settings on Windows.  I'm trying to understand 
if we switch to using AIR's SecureSocket for TLS support whether that also uses 
IE settings.

I think my next step is to try to find sources for the current code and see 
where it gets stuck.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 6/13/18, 12:27 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

FYI, I just tried suggestion from Henk in infra comments and it's failed as
well.

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 12 cze 2018 o 09:28 Piotr Zarzycki 
napisał(a):

> Ok Let's wait to their answer. Thanks!
>
> wt., 12 cze 2018 o 09:19 Alex Harui  napisał(a):
>
>> I decided to ask Infra 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-16640=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C333a36f4a7f84a07e3a908d5d0ff12c7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636644716304449784=9k3t3GcBqURaNt5M5v6pIawviZx%2F4DnkJ5h4m9BAo9s%3D=0
>>
>> I also saw this:
>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblog.pcisecuritystandards.org%2Fare-you-ready-for-30-june-2018-sayin-goodbye-to-ssl-early-tls=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C333a36f4a7f84a07e3a908d5d0ff12c7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636644716304449784=kymNLcXx0IihC6pdzrNLoGSdHPEc86ckVpzJwXN3DcM%3D=0
>>
>> I'm wondering if the HTTPS code in the installer can handle the latest
>> TLS.  The notes for the code we use says "partial TLS1.0 implementation".
    >>
>> Thoughts?
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 6/11/18, 9:43 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>>
>> Because Rawgit could be a faster remedy than putting together a whole
>> new release.
>>
>> However, before we go that route, we need to verify that the
>> Installer can in fact download over HTTPS from the rawgit server.  My
>> understanding from this thread is that HTTPS may be working on some 
servers
>> but not others?
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 6/11/18, 9:03 PM, "Justin Mclean" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Do we really want to go with a service that states "this is a
>> free service,
>> so there are no uptime or support guarantees.". I not sure we
>> even have an
>> issue with downloading the binary connivance releases so why do
>> we need to
>> move them from where they currently are?
>>
>> Justin
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:05 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
>> bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Rawgit might be a good option for us:
>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce1271815ffce4da34b4308d5d0197f62%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643730289596335=3GuiC1GhJIPPW3LowsPOUNtYobe%2FS3SvUhPqj%2FNFQl8%3D=0
>> >
>> > If no one has objections, I can set this up.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Om
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 5:12 PM Alex Harui
>>  wrote:
    >> >
>> > > Also, I think if we can find a volunteer to host the entire
>> binary folder
>> > > (and thus pay the bandwidth costs) that will solve the
>> problem without
>> > > requiring an update to the installer.
>> > >
>> > > My 2 cents,
>> > > -Alex
>> > >
>> > > On 6/11/18, 

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

I decided to ask Infra https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16640

I also saw this:  
https://blog.pcisecuritystandards.org/are-you-ready-for-30-june-2018-sayin-goodbye-to-ssl-early-tls

I'm wondering if the HTTPS code in the installer can handle the latest TLS.  
The notes for the code we use says "partial TLS1.0 implementation".

Thoughts?
-Alex

On 6/11/18, 9:43 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

Because Rawgit could be a faster remedy than putting together a whole new 
release.

However, before we go that route, we need to verify that the Installer can 
in fact download over HTTPS from the rawgit server.  My understanding from this 
thread is that HTTPS may be working on some servers but not others?

-Alex

On 6/11/18, 9:03 PM, "Justin Mclean"  wrote:

Hi,

Do we really want to go with a service that states "this is a free 
service,
so there are no uptime or support guarantees.". I not sure we even have 
an
issue with downloading the binary connivance releases so why do we need 
to
move them from where they currently are?

Justin

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:05 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala 

wrote:

> Rawgit might be a good option for us: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce1271815ffce4da34b4308d5d0197f62%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643730289596335=3GuiC1GhJIPPW3LowsPOUNtYobe%2FS3SvUhPqj%2FNFQl8%3D=0
>
> If no one has objections, I can set this up.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
    >
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 5:12 PM Alex Harui  
wrote:
>
> > Also, I think if we can find a volunteer to host the entire binary 
folder
> > (and thus pay the bandwidth costs) that will solve the problem 
without
> > requiring an update to the installer.
> >
    > > My 2 cents,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 6/11/18, 5:05 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. Are you proposing a new release of the installer?  The 
location
> > of the apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml is supposed to be
> > release-specific.  Each release can have its own version in case we 
need
> to
> > change steps in the release, so I don't think we want to hardcode 
it to
> the
> > URL you are using for testing.
> >
> > Did you say that if you use https to access this file on our 
website
> > that it also fails?  I find that really interesting if you are also
> saying
> > that the install does complete if we use https to download some of 
the
> > artifacts like AIR29.  Can you verify that this is only an issue for
> > hitting apache.org sites via HTTPS and make sure your AIR29 didn't 
come
> > out of the download cache?
> >
> > If it is an HTTPS for apache.org only, I think we want to 
understand
> > why and build a really small test case to show Infra.  Because if 
they
> made
> > a config change on apache.org/dist, if one of the other places we
> > download from make the same change we will be stuck again.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 6/11/18, 1:25 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 

> > wrote:
> >
> > I simply placed link here [1].
> >
> > APACHE_FLEX_BIN_INSTALLER_URL =
> > "
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fapache-flex-sdk-
> installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7Ceda63602f32e4a98d35f08d5cfd97c84%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643455386260834=8%2FKeViaRU2QlsM%2BDVqI9%
> 2B5VwFRaoR3cYywVPiD8iiI4%3D=0
> > "
> >
> >
> > [1]
    > > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%
> 
2F2JC5dcX=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ceda63602f32e4a98d35f08d5cfd9
> 7c84%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%
> 7C636643455386260834=k3wKVwi2OH9dwPoTXlvYz4gKQnNs85
> II6JxH7GUSMPE%3D=0
> >
> > pon., 11 cze 2018 o 22:10 Alex Harui 

> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > But what code knew to start

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Because Rawgit could be a faster remedy than putting together a whole new 
release.

However, before we go that route, we need to verify that the Installer can in 
fact download over HTTPS from the rawgit server.  My understanding from this 
thread is that HTTPS may be working on some servers but not others?

-Alex

On 6/11/18, 9:03 PM, "Justin Mclean"  wrote:

Hi,

Do we really want to go with a service that states "this is a free service,
so there are no uptime or support guarantees.". I not sure we even have an
issue with downloading the binary connivance releases so why do we need to
move them from where they currently are?

Justin

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:05 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala 
wrote:

> Rawgit might be a good option for us: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce1271815ffce4da34b4308d5d0197f62%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643730289596335=3GuiC1GhJIPPW3LowsPOUNtYobe%2FS3SvUhPqj%2FNFQl8%3D=0
>
> If no one has objections, I can set this up.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 5:12 PM Alex Harui  wrote:
>
> > Also, I think if we can find a volunteer to host the entire binary 
folder
> > (and thus pay the bandwidth costs) that will solve the problem without
> > requiring an update to the installer.
> >
    > > My 2 cents,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 6/11/18, 5:05 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. Are you proposing a new release of the installer?  The location
> > of the apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml is supposed to be
> > release-specific.  Each release can have its own version in case we need
> to
> > change steps in the release, so I don't think we want to hardcode it to
> the
> > URL you are using for testing.
> >
> > Did you say that if you use https to access this file on our website
> > that it also fails?  I find that really interesting if you are also
> saying
> > that the install does complete if we use https to download some of the
> > artifacts like AIR29.  Can you verify that this is only an issue for
> > hitting apache.org sites via HTTPS and make sure your AIR29 didn't come
> > out of the download cache?
> >
> > If it is an HTTPS for apache.org only, I think we want to understand
> > why and build a really small test case to show Infra.  Because if they
> made
> > a config change on apache.org/dist, if one of the other places we
> > download from make the same change we will be stuck again.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 6/11/18, 1:25 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> > wrote:
> >
> > I simply placed link here [1].
> >
> > APACHE_FLEX_BIN_INSTALLER_URL =
> > "
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fapache-flex-sdk-
> installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7Ceda63602f32e4a98d35f08d5cfd97c84%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643455386260834=8%2FKeViaRU2QlsM%2BDVqI9%
> 2B5VwFRaoR3cYywVPiD8iiI4%3D=0
> > "
> >
> >
> >     [1]
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%
> 2F2JC5dcX=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ceda63602f32e4a98d35f08d5cfd9
> 7c84%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%
> 7C636643455386260834=k3wKVwi2OH9dwPoTXlvYz4gKQnNs85
> II6JxH7GUSMPE%3D=0
> >
> > pon., 11 cze 2018 o 22:10 Alex Harui 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > But what code knew to start looking at the website instead of
> > dist?
> > > Didn't something else need to change?  I'm trying to 
understand
> > all of the
> > > pieces.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 6/11/18, 12:34 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Alex,
> > >
> > > When we are trying to read following file [1], we are
> > getting time out
> > > in
> > > installer. I moved that file to our website [2] and 
locally
> > tested
> > > instal

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Also, I think if we can find a volunteer to host the entire binary folder (and 
thus pay the bandwidth costs) that will solve the problem without requiring an 
update to the installer.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 6/11/18, 5:05 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

Hmm. Are you proposing a new release of the installer?  The location of the 
apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml is supposed to be release-specific.  Each 
release can have its own version in case we need to change steps in the 
release, so I don't think we want to hardcode it to the URL you are using for 
testing.

Did you say that if you use https to access this file on our website that 
it also fails?  I find that really interesting if you are also saying that the 
install does complete if we use https to download some of the artifacts like 
AIR29.  Can you verify that this is only an issue for hitting apache.org sites 
via HTTPS and make sure your AIR29 didn't come out of the download cache?

If it is an HTTPS for apache.org only, I think we want to understand why 
and build a really small test case to show Infra.  Because if they made a 
config change on apache.org/dist, if one of the other places we download from 
make the same change we will be stuck again.

Thoughts?
-Alex

On 6/11/18, 1:25 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

I simply placed link here [1].

APACHE_FLEX_BIN_INSTALLER_URL =

"https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ceda63602f32e4a98d35f08d5cfd97c84%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643455386260834=8%2FKeViaRU2QlsM%2BDVqI9%2B5VwFRaoR3cYywVPiD8iiI4%3D=0;


[1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F2JC5dcX=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ceda63602f32e4a98d35f08d5cfd97c84%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636643455386260834=k3wKVwi2OH9dwPoTXlvYz4gKQnNs85II6JxH7GUSMPE%3D=0

pon., 11 cze 2018 o 22:10 Alex Harui  
napisał(a):

> But what code knew to start looking at the website instead of dist?
> Didn't something else need to change?  I'm trying to understand all 
of the
> pieces.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 6/11/18, 12:34 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  
wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> When we are trying to read following file [1], we are getting 
time out
> in
> installer. I moved that file to our website [2] and locally tested
> installer. - I got positive results. It's started to work.
>
> [1]
>
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdist%2Fflex%2F4.16.1%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8cf556e5bf954296e05908d5cfd26258%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643424854057105=WaA3FpmHKJuhJI5Dpvxy6gfIBXOYBNg862fzTpLSucQ%3D=0
> [2]
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8cf556e5bf954296e05908d5cfd26258%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643424854057105=nRM0G2Vsc3uVg9sg3SEiF%2FnKzmO34dUJACfhl47MbEc%3D=0
    >
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 11 cze 2018 o 17:24 Alex Harui 
> napisał(a):
>
> > I think I'm lost.  The commit message shows that one file was 
added
> to our
> > site.  What file is pointing to it and how did it know to look 
at
> our site?
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 6/11/18, 12:58 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 

> wrote:
> >
> > I moved file on our website [1] and it's working. If I 
change it
> to
> > https
> > we have time out issue as well. When file was used from my
> server I
> > also
> > used https and it was working.
> >
> > Can we just use that location [1] and we will have installer
> working ?
> >
> > [1]
> >
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4d8ae8042ed840e0cd9908d5cf712b17%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643007320096225=YmowJViVHdhqCrxcGSZLg%2BYY86G%2BsbJCAqsYkcOWEHw%3D=0
> >
> > Thanks,
   

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Hmm. Are you proposing a new release of the installer?  The location of the 
apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml is supposed to be release-specific.  Each 
release can have its own version in case we need to change steps in the 
release, so I don't think we want to hardcode it to the URL you are using for 
testing.

Did you say that if you use https to access this file on our website that it 
also fails?  I find that really interesting if you are also saying that the 
install does complete if we use https to download some of the artifacts like 
AIR29.  Can you verify that this is only an issue for hitting apache.org sites 
via HTTPS and make sure your AIR29 didn't come out of the download cache?

If it is an HTTPS for apache.org only, I think we want to understand why and 
build a really small test case to show Infra.  Because if they made a config 
change on apache.org/dist, if one of the other places we download from make the 
same change we will be stuck again.

Thoughts?
-Alex

On 6/11/18, 1:25 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

I simply placed link here [1].

APACHE_FLEX_BIN_INSTALLER_URL =

"https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ceda63602f32e4a98d35f08d5cfd97c84%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643455386260834=8%2FKeViaRU2QlsM%2BDVqI9%2B5VwFRaoR3cYywVPiD8iiI4%3D=0;


[1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F2JC5dcX=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ceda63602f32e4a98d35f08d5cfd97c84%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636643455386260834=k3wKVwi2OH9dwPoTXlvYz4gKQnNs85II6JxH7GUSMPE%3D=0

pon., 11 cze 2018 o 22:10 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> But what code knew to start looking at the website instead of dist?
> Didn't something else need to change?  I'm trying to understand all of the
> pieces.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 6/11/18, 12:34 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> When we are trying to read following file [1], we are getting time out
> in
> installer. I moved that file to our website [2] and locally tested
> installer. - I got positive results. It's started to work.
>
> [1]
>
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdist%2Fflex%2F4.16.1%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8cf556e5bf954296e05908d5cfd26258%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643424854057105=WaA3FpmHKJuhJI5Dpvxy6gfIBXOYBNg862fzTpLSucQ%3D=0
> [2]
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8cf556e5bf954296e05908d5cfd26258%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643424854057105=nRM0G2Vsc3uVg9sg3SEiF%2FnKzmO34dUJACfhl47MbEc%3D=0
    >
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 11 cze 2018 o 17:24 Alex Harui 
> napisał(a):
>
> > I think I'm lost.  The commit message shows that one file was added
> to our
> > site.  What file is pointing to it and how did it know to look at
> our site?
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 6/11/18, 12:58 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> wrote:
> >
> > I moved file on our website [1] and it's working. If I change it
> to
> > https
> > we have time out issue as well. When file was used from my
> server I
> > also
> > used https and it was working.
> >
> > Can we just use that location [1] and we will have installer
> working ?
> >
> > [1]
> >
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4d8ae8042ed840e0cd9908d5cf712b17%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643007320096225=YmowJViVHdhqCrxcGSZLg%2BYY86G%2BsbJCAqsYkcOWEHw%3D=0
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > pon., 11 cze 2018 o 09:31 Justin Mclean <
> jus...@classsoftware.com>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > No I'm not suggesting that. AFAIK it's only the config text
> file
> > that Prior
> > > wants to host.
> > >
> > > On Mon., 11 Jun. 2018, 8:47 am Alex Harui,
>  > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
>  

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

But what code knew to start looking at the website instead of dist?  Didn't 
something else need to change?  I'm trying to understand all of the pieces.

-Alex

On 6/11/18, 12:34 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Alex,

When we are trying to read following file [1], we are getting time out in
installer. I moved that file to our website [2] and locally tested
installer. - I got positive results. It's started to work.

[1]

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdist%2Fflex%2F4.16.1%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8cf556e5bf954296e05908d5cfd26258%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643424854057105=WaA3FpmHKJuhJI5Dpvxy6gfIBXOYBNg862fzTpLSucQ%3D=0
[2]  
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8cf556e5bf954296e05908d5cfd26258%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643424854057105=nRM0G2Vsc3uVg9sg3SEiF%2FnKzmO34dUJACfhl47MbEc%3D=0

Thanks,
Piotr

pon., 11 cze 2018 o 17:24 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> I think I'm lost.  The commit message shows that one file was added to our
> site.  What file is pointing to it and how did it know to look at our 
site?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 6/11/18, 12:58 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> I moved file on our website [1] and it's working. If I change it to
> https
> we have time out issue as well. When file was used from my server I
> also
> used https and it was working.
>
> Can we just use that location [1] and we will have installer working ?
>
> [1]
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4d8ae8042ed840e0cd9908d5cf712b17%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643007320096225=YmowJViVHdhqCrxcGSZLg%2BYY86G%2BsbJCAqsYkcOWEHw%3D=0
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 11 cze 2018 o 09:31 Justin Mclean 
> napisał(a):
>
> > No I'm not suggesting that. AFAIK it's only the config text file
    > that Prior
> > wants to host.
> >
> > On Mon., 11 Jun. 2018, 8:47 am Alex Harui,  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Justin,
> > >
> > > Are you suggesting that we distribute a binary artifact from our
> project
> > > website?  Do other projects do that?
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 6/10/18, 10:27 PM, "Justin Mclean" 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > I'm talking about that file [1]. What kind of security
> issues do
> > you
> > > > exactly see if I move that file on my server ?
> > >
> > > Well if someone changed the paths in those files, our users
> could
> > > unwitting be made to download walware or other stuff. Risk is
> probably
> > low
> > > but I have no details on the server this file is going on, for
> instance
> > it
> > > it a dedicated server or one that contains shared hosts for
> instance.
> > What
> > > other services are running on this server? How is the file
> > uloaded/updated
> > > on that server? What security is in place to stop others modifying
> that
> > > file? If it located in Poland is that going to cause performance
> issues
> > for
> > > people outside of Europe? What happens if the server falls overs
> can
> > > someone on the PMC restart it? Will the rest of the PMC have
> access to
> > this
> > > server? Might be best to answer on the private list if you don’t
> want
> > > details about your server made public.
> > >
> > > Perhaps a better solution would be to host them on the Apache
> Flex
> > > website as currently we do for [1] which the installer gets. Is it
> too
> > hard
> > > to have a
> > >
> >
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2FXXX%2Fsdk-installer-config-4.0.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cbe3b60c8248

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

I think I'm lost.  The commit message shows that one file was added to our 
site.  What file is pointing to it and how did it know to look at our site?

-Alex

On 6/11/18, 12:58 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

I moved file on our website [1] and it's working. If I change it to https
we have time out issue as well. When file was used from my server I also
used https and it was working.

Can we just use that location [1] and we will have installer working ?

[1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4d8ae8042ed840e0cd9908d5cf712b17%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643007320096225=YmowJViVHdhqCrxcGSZLg%2BYY86G%2BsbJCAqsYkcOWEHw%3D=0

Thanks,
Piotr

pon., 11 cze 2018 o 09:31 Justin Mclean 
napisał(a):

> No I'm not suggesting that. AFAIK it's only the config text file that 
Prior
> wants to host.
>
> On Mon., 11 Jun. 2018, 8:47 am Alex Harui, 
> wrote:
>
> > Justin,
> >
> > Are you suggesting that we distribute a binary artifact from our project
> > website?  Do other projects do that?
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 6/10/18, 10:27 PM, "Justin Mclean"  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I'm talking about that file [1]. What kind of security issues do
> you
> > > exactly see if I move that file on my server ?
> >
> > Well if someone changed the paths in those files, our users could
> > unwitting be made to download walware or other stuff. Risk is probably
> low
> > but I have no details on the server this file is going on, for instance
> it
> > it a dedicated server or one that contains shared hosts for instance.
> What
> > other services are running on this server? How is the file
> uloaded/updated
> > on that server? What security is in place to stop others modifying that
> > file? If it located in Poland is that going to cause performance issues
> for
> > people outside of Europe? What happens if the server falls overs can
> > someone on the PMC restart it? Will the rest of the PMC have access to
> this
> > server? Might be best to answer on the private list if you don’t want
> > details about your server made public.
> >
> > Perhaps a better solution would be to host them on the Apache Flex
> > website as currently we do for [1] which the installer gets. Is it too
> hard
> > to have a
> >
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2FXXX%2Fsdk-installer-config-4.0.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cbe3b60c824884a383f7d08d5cf5c1704%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636642916791710330=CUrCENwFIuMoAtvJnjoNXT9o41rbsXGXojcwa5QH%2Bys%3D=0
> ,
> > were XXX if the flex version number as well? Given the issue is only 
with
> > 4.16.0 and 4.16.1that’s only two files we would need to host there. That
> > way access and security are handled by ASF infrastructure and we don’t
> have
> > to worry about them.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1.
> >
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fsdk-installer-config-4.0.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cbe3b60c824884a383f7d08d5cf5c1704%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636642916791710330=2ld9NbW8Uar2ARRbaXv14uQ1cNN2U2ZIxWjqpnJdqX0%3D=0
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4d8ae8042ed840e0cd9908d5cf712b17%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643007320096225=v5vx417pobFqInf08DbisQPeFu%2FU0WyzufbVEL%2F%2B2Ho%3D=0

<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4d8ae8042ed840e0cd9908d5cf712b17%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636643007320106230=S3Q%2FNmTpKKkr9oEtYLfIDNZvz7pYHcQyeiuVF7cPLq0%3D=0>*

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Justin,

Are you suggesting that we distribute a binary artifact from our project 
website?  Do other projects do that?

-Alex

On 6/10/18, 10:27 PM, "Justin Mclean"  wrote:

Hi,

> I'm talking about that file [1]. What kind of security issues do you
> exactly see if I move that file on my server ?

Well if someone changed the paths in those files, our users could unwitting 
be made to download walware or other stuff. Risk is probably low but I have no 
details on the server this file is going on, for instance it it a dedicated 
server or one that contains shared hosts for instance. What other services are 
running on this server? How is the file uloaded/updated on that server? What 
security is in place to stop others modifying that file? If it located in 
Poland is that going to cause performance issues for people outside of Europe? 
What happens if the server falls overs can someone on the PMC restart it? Will 
the rest of the PMC have access to this server? Might be best to answer on the 
private list if you don’t want details about your server made public. 

Perhaps a better solution would be to host them on the Apache Flex website 
as currently we do for [1] which the installer gets. Is it too hard to have a 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2FXXX%2Fsdk-installer-config-4.0.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cbe3b60c824884a383f7d08d5cf5c1704%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636642916791710330=CUrCENwFIuMoAtvJnjoNXT9o41rbsXGXojcwa5QH%2Bys%3D=0,
 were XXX if the flex version number as well? Given the issue is only with 
4.16.0 and 4.16.1that’s only two files we would need to host there. That way 
access and security are handled by ASF infrastructure and we don’t have to 
worry about them.

Thanks,
Justin

1. 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fsdk-installer-config-4.0.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cbe3b60c824884a383f7d08d5cf5c1704%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636642916791710330=2ld9NbW8Uar2ARRbaXv14uQ1cNN2U2ZIxWjqpnJdqX0%3D=0

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

I think you can, or even some company like the folks behind Moonshine.  I 
cannot think of any restrictions against doing that.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 6/8/18, 1:12 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi PMCs,

What if I store problematic file on my server ? Can I do that without
breaking some Apache policies ?

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 5 cze 2018 o 08:34 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> See:
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread.html%2Fc8abaa83b83c260e899517e32baf6dfe5d4de6524eb2b2a3ffcdff31%40%253Cdev.flex.apache.org%253E=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca63ca9106c7c4948ff8f08d5cd1785b2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636640423293428892=t7oRNB2z1H3F3CYvh7eQ%2FhV60Ws3D0HtJWTRm83mVp4%3D=0
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 6/4/18, 9:35 PM, "joho"  wrote:
>
> I am getting an SSL Error when running "ant -f installer.xml"
>
> Has one else encountered a similar error?
>
> /Users/dev/Downloads/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/installer.xml:927: The
> following error occurred while executing this line:
> /Users/dev/Downloads/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/installer.xml:967:
> javax.net.ssl.SSLException: Received fatal alert: protocol_version
> at sun.security.ssl.Alerts.getSSLException(Alerts.java:208)
> at sun.security.ssl.Alerts.getSSLException(Alerts.java:154)
> at
> sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.recvAlert(SSLSocketImpl.java:1979)
> at
> sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.readRecord(SSLSocketImpl.java:1086)
> at
>
> 
sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.performInitialHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1332)
> at
> sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1359)
> at
> sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1343)
> at
>
> sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsClient.afterConnect(HttpsClient.java:559)
> at
>
> 
sun.net.www.protocol.https.AbstractDelegateHttpsURLConnection.connect(AbstractDelegateHttpsURLConnection.java:185)
> at
>
> 
sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl.connect(HttpsURLConnectionImpl.java:153)
> at
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.openConnection(Get.java:737)
> at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.get(Get.java:650)
> at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.run(Get.java:640)
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca4325be303b444a5dd7f08d5ca9dc763%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636637701363988747=%2B93MVlqQ5kXO%2FDTra2kET9XmZa7YrDIoK3q0%2B8YiiCo%3D=0
>
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca63ca9106c7c4948ff8f08d5cd1785b2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636640423293428892=YU7GFQofMlK26Adym0qmxQ8tJHb%2BD1GW9p2PWGknGpk%3D=0

<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca63ca9106c7c4948ff8f08d5cd1785b2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636640423293428892=YU7GFQofMlK26Adym0qmxQ8tJHb%2BD1GW9p2PWGknGpk%3D=0>*

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

See: 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c8abaa83b83c260e899517e32baf6dfe5d4de6524eb2b2a3ffcdff31@%3Cdev.flex.apache.org%3E

HTH,
-Alex

On 6/4/18, 9:35 PM, "joho"  wrote:

I am getting an SSL Error when running "ant -f installer.xml"

Has one else encountered a similar error?

/Users/dev/Downloads/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/installer.xml:927: The
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/dev/Downloads/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/installer.xml:967:
javax.net.ssl.SSLException: Received fatal alert: protocol_version
at sun.security.ssl.Alerts.getSSLException(Alerts.java:208)
at sun.security.ssl.Alerts.getSSLException(Alerts.java:154)
at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.recvAlert(SSLSocketImpl.java:1979)
at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.readRecord(SSLSocketImpl.java:1086)
at

sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.performInitialHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1332)
at 
sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1359)
at 
sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1343)
at
sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsClient.afterConnect(HttpsClient.java:559)
at

sun.net.www.protocol.https.AbstractDelegateHttpsURLConnection.connect(AbstractDelegateHttpsURLConnection.java:185)
at

sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl.connect(HttpsURLConnectionImpl.java:153)
at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.openConnection(Get.java:737)
at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.get(Get.java:650)
at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.run(Get.java:640)



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca4325be303b444a5dd7f08d5ca9dc763%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636637701363988747=%2B93MVlqQ5kXO%2FDTra2kET9XmZa7YrDIoK3q0%2B8YiiCo%3D=0

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Hit this URL:  http://flex.apache.org/installer/sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml

Search for:  air.sdk.version.windows.29.0 and air.sdk.version.mac.29.0
The URLs should be HTTPS and not HTTP
If they are still HTTP, try refreshing the browser or clearing its cache.

Then try again with "ant -f installer.xml" and if it still fails, post a link 
to the entire log.

HTH,
-Alex

On 6/4/18, 12:43 PM, "oharkins"  wrote:

Can we get some traction on this as I cant update AIR or Flex to the latest,
and Apple is blocking my app.

I have tried "ant -f installer.xml" same failure as the previous post.

If there is any way to get this installed by downloading the AIR SDK and
installing flex I am all ears.

Thanks

P.S. This is what Apple is sending me for a rejection for my app. Supposed
to be fixed in 29

Your app uses or references the following non-public APIs:

_IOPSGetPowerSourceDescription, _IOPSCopyPowerSourcesList,
_IOPSCopyPowerSourcesInfo

The use of non-public APIs is not permitted on the App Store because it can
lead to a poor user experience should these APIs change. 

Continuing to use or conceal non-public APIs in future submissions of this
app may result in the termination of your Apple Developer account, as well
as removal of all associated apps from the App Store.



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4d602c3b6cf54b982d1208d5ca537af1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636637382249982080=dR0%2BqLUpBjWXXLIN6OOMV7cnNN%2Figlq1RvF9M5oQHxE%3D=0

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Hi Maxim,

You got the correct results.  The browser says that because the cgi returned 
plain text instead of html.  Do a "View Source" on the page and you should see 
it is plain text which should be what we want.

Maybe there is a bug in the mirror the cgi picks for Justin.  We'll see what 
Piotr finds.  I just noticed that single-mirror is returning an HTTP and not an 
HTTPS url so I'm now confused why the attempt to fetch 
flex/4.16.1/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml is going through 
HTTPS.  Is anybody getting an HTTPS result?  Is anybody else getting more than 
one line back from single-mirror besides Justin?

-Alex

On 6/1/18, 2:12 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik"  wrote:


https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Fsingle-mirror-url--xml.cgi=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc0eb76c101d14c17dc5808d5c79fdc1d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636634411766729056=2KI%2BgmBP9vlV7dUlD6JhBNbSM9LLU9w2gKMFizqhOoQ%3D=0

Returns:
--
This page contains the following errors:

error on line 1 at column 1: Document is empty

Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error.
--

Maybe it worth to contact the INFRA and ask for the script similar to

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.lua=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc0eb76c101d14c17dc5808d5c79fdc1d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636634411766729056=rI0upItBGUuEkedBGUA2XkiazROT%2Bb37NNoYmYNAVGM%3D=0
But returning URL without HTML ... ?

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
 wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> I see exactly the same thing as Maxim.
>
> This site can’t provide a secure connection
>
> *apache.melbourneitmirror.net 
*
 uses
> an unsupported protocol.
> ERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCH
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pt., 1 cze 2018 o 10:57 Justin Mclean  napisał(a):
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > The worst thing that I have seen the same as Alex - that there is a
>> problem
>> > with https, not parsing itself.
>>
>> If it is an https issue like this (one of the possible mirrors that can 
be
>> returned)
>>
>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.melbourneitmirror.net%2Fflex%2F4.16.1%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc0eb76c101d14c17dc5808d5c79fdc1d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636634411766729056=pI1lIZ3Q66mD0dzhT205q2Bhc%2Fzbs0ci9IqnqVsjDvE%3D=0
>> <
>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.melbourneitmirror.net%2Fflex%2F4.16.1%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc0eb76c101d14c17dc5808d5c79fdc1d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636634411766729056=pI1lIZ3Q66mD0dzhT205q2Bhc%2Fzbs0ci9IqnqVsjDvE%3D=0
>> >
>>
>> I can’t see how we could easily solve it as it likely at the mirrors end.
>> (Open that URL in a browser and see what you get.)
>>
>> It may be that SSL in not supported on all Apache mirrors, perhaps on
>> purpose?? Has anyone asked infra? I have no idea if this is the case or 
not
>> and a quick search of teh documentation doesn’t mention https and 
mirrors.
>>
>> I know that the KEY files and hashes need to checked via SSL and not
>> placed on mirrors, but all mirror examples use http not https and there 
is
>> this JIRA which suggests that https requests need to redirect and return
>> 301s. [1] (which is moved permanently)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
>> 1. 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-13442=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc0eb76c101d14c17dc5808d5c79fdc1d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636634411766729056=98JWUAAah%2FRLNN7dxi12wrLclDb6lRz%2Bt6y4f55cntA%3D=0
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc0eb76c101d14c17dc5808d5c79fdc1d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636634411766729056=rsGpcdht%2FGLo%2Fqh09nPHPjTYYL22DQwwlt3xoteSBnI%3D=0
> 

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Hi Justin,

I think you've proposed multiple causes.  One is that the cgi isn't returning 
the right thing, the other was that fetching apache-flex-installer-config.xml 
over https was failing.  Which one or both are you claiming to be the issue?

If I just use my browser to hit: 
http://flex.apache.org/single-mirror-url--xml.cgi
I am getting the expected single line back.  Can some other folks hit this link 
above?  You should get a single line of text, not even an HTML page.   Same 
with using CURL.  I only get one line of text back.

-Alex


On 5/31/18, 10:35 PM, "Justin Mclean"  wrote:

Hi,

> That doesn't sound like what I saw when I debugged into it last week, but 
if you are right, then it sounds like you can prepare a fix for it.

I’ve run into through a reverse proxy to record the installers traffic and 
also though the debugger and both match. Perhaps there was also a different 
issue last week or we also have another issue that occurs after this step. But 
note that the call to that cgi script is http call not a https call when made 
by the installer. I’ve include the response to the cgi script below as seen by 
the reverse proxy. You’ll can also see that 5K is a lot bigger than the 
expected response should be.

Sorry I’m running back to back courses on the weekend and all next week 
(inter state) and then off to Berlin for The Apache Roadshow the week after so 
I'm not sure when I’ll have time over the next couple of weeks to fix it. It 
should just be a simple mater of changing the cgi script / web site config to 
produce what that installer expects and there no need to change the installer 
code or make a new release of the installer. This could be probably easily 
tested by briefly putting up a hard coded response in replace of that cgi 
script to see if the current installer works with that.

Thanks,
Justin

Reverse proxy request:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Fsingle-mirror-url--xml.cgi=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cfd4e314adc7741d747a408d5c7816fc9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636634281130451434=O9nfK6AW68caytlSJV%2BlKIJoSnGGbeiDL%2Bkx8m9ZswA%3D=0
Complete
200 OK
Total size: 5.14 KB (5268 bytes)
72.6% (gzip)

Reverse proxy response:



  
  
  
  
  https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdyn%2Fcloser.cgi=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cfd4e314adc7741d747a408d5c7816fc9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636634281130451434=NLcVNejk18DywgVnwScu3Y53Sho1GGuutbk7qJmpRb4%3D=0;
 />
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  Apache Download Mirrors
  
  








  

  

  

  Toggle navigation
  
  
  


  
  
HomeDyn

  
About 

Overview
Members
Process
Sponsorship
Glossary
FAQ
Code of Conduct
Contact

  
Projects

People 

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpeople.apache.org%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cfd4e314adc7741d747a408d5c7816fc9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636634281130451434=soAQCoO1Zt6NGblRQJi3nlDR2fUZM0r8Cvb8Gyeq2Mc%3D=0;>Overview
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpeople.apache.org%2Fcommitter-index.html=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cfd4e314adc7741d747a408d5c7816fc9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636634281130451434=yNuPaV7FkkYvQluwgGwU%2BPluNK2d64cgYFZRTtcQqAs%3D=0;>Committers
Meritocracy
Roles
Code of Conduct
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fplanet.apache.org%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cfd4e314adc7741d747a408d5c7816fc9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636634281130451434=IS%2F97ikLM73sAXItSyW1ZevLi2x%2B6LOyTKTDBBVkx9o%3D=0;>Planet
 Apache


  
Get 

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Hi Justin,

That doesn't sound like what I saw when I debugged into it last week, but if 
you are right, then it sounds like you can prepare a fix for it.

-Alex

On 5/31/18, 7:36 PM, "Justin Mclean"  wrote:

Hi,

> 1. The page structure has changed and it failing to correctly parse the 
mirror URL out of the page so the URL it manufactures times out

And Ive confirmed (in the debugger) that exactly what is happening. This 
code below in MirrorURLUtil.as is no longer parsing the correct mirror name out 
of the content returned.

var result:String = _internetUtil.result;

_mirrorURL = (result.search("") != -1) ? 
result.substring(3, result.length - 4) : 
result;

Issue being I think that the cgi script is returning full page of HTML 
which is not what this code expects.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Hi Joel,

There are two different issues that have been brought up.  The installer 
program is required to use a mirror to download the latest release (4.16.1) per 
Apache policy.  The installer is failing to fetch the mirror information over 
HTTPS.  We have asked for help from the original developer of our HTTPS 
handling code.

So, as an alternative until that is fixed, I have suggested folks use Apache 
Ant.  One user wrote in to say that the Adobe AIR SDK would not download 
because Ant would not allow a redirection from HTTP to HTTPS, so I just updated 
the AIR 29 URL we download from to HTTPS so there won't be a switch.  So folks 
who have tried Apache Ant to install Apache Flex should try again.

But the installer program will not work for Flex 4.16.1 until we find a way to 
host the release some place without requiring a mirror lookup.  I think 
Justin's original reply on this thread was not quite right and led to confusion.

So, folks wanting to install Apache Flex 4.16.1 should use Ant for now.  But I 
think I've made other changes today so that you can use the installer program 
to Install 4.16.0 and earlier, but you may not be successful using the 
installer program with these older releases and Adobe AIR 28 and 29.  You may 
need to use older releases and older Adobe AIR SDKs.

Hopefully we will get this straightened out soon.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 5/31/18, 3:30 PM, "Joel Tan"  wrote:

Hi Justin,

> Look like Alex has updated that UTL to use https, you might want to try
again.
Have tried it but still the same timeout issue, I am using the same version
of installer (3.3.1 Mac) to install, do I need to use the older versions of
installer instead?

Joel

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:21 AM, Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > As what Justin has explained, it is due to the redirection from http to
> > https issue, this mean even if I use the order version of the installer
> > will still having the same problem.
>
> Look like Alex has updated that UTL to use https, you might want to try
> again.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

I updated the AIR 29 to start with HTTPS.  Please try again.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 5/31/18, 1:08 PM, "oharkins"  wrote:

Tried Installing via ant -f install.xml here is my log with a failed build. 

check-cache:

download_using_get:
  [get] Getting:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fproperties%2Fsdk%2Fen_US.properties=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C425b7e9656174c1faa6b08d5c7325347%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633941330917025=YGYqRik8h4bpSxNnPs%2FPzhBAf4YcrOpDYuidBNE47T4%3D=0
  [get] To:

/Users/oharkins/Documents/Adobe/ApachieFlex/test/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/en_US.properties

get-if-not-cached:
  [get] Getting:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Finstaller%2Fproperties%2Fsdk%2Fen_US.properties=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C425b7e9656174c1faa6b08d5c7325347%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633941330917025=YGYqRik8h4bpSxNnPs%2FPzhBAf4YcrOpDYuidBNE47T4%3D=0
  [get] To:

/Users/oharkins/Documents/Adobe/ApachieFlex/test/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/en_US.properties

check-params:

get-with-no-params:
  [get] Getting:

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fairdownload.adobe.com%2Fair%2Fmac%2Fdownload%2F29.0%2F%2FAdobeAIRSDK.dmg%3Fts%3D201805311405=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C425b7e9656174c1faa6b08d5c7325347%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633941330917025=SLMfem6kXDSsQCIBrjO1x13mivyOIhv0ga4LK3SBj54%3D=0
  [get] To:

/Users/oharkins/Documents/Adobe/ApachieFlex/test/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/in/AdobeAIRSDK.dmg
  [get]

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fairdownload.adobe.com%2Fair%2Fmac%2Fdownload%2F29.0%2F%2FAdobeAIRSDK.dmg%3Fts%3D201805311405=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C425b7e9656174c1faa6b08d5c7325347%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633941330917025=SLMfem6kXDSsQCIBrjO1x13mivyOIhv0ga4LK3SBj54%3D=0
permanently moved to

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fairdownload.adobe.com%2Fair%2Fmac%2Fdownload%2F29.0%2FAdobeAIRSDK.dmg%3Fts%3D201805311405=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C425b7e9656174c1faa6b08d5c7325347%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633941330917025=YLAB8NJWoe96f3eE78sPiuoCZ4W4kcM%2BjPSSYfP1ZO0%3D=0

BUILD FAILED

/Users/oharkins/Documents/Adobe/ApachieFlex/test/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/installer.xml:351:
The following error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/oharkins/Documents/Adobe/ApachieFlex/test/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/installer.xml:371:
The following error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/oharkins/Documents/Adobe/ApachieFlex/test/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/installer.xml:895:
The following error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/oharkins/Documents/Adobe/ApachieFlex/test/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/installer.xml:920:
The following error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/oharkins/Documents/Adobe/ApachieFlex/test/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/installer.xml:927:
The following error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/oharkins/Documents/Adobe/ApachieFlex/test/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin/installer.xml:967:
Redirection detected from http to https. Protocol switch unsafe, not
allowed.



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C425b7e9656174c1faa6b08d5c7325347%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633941330917025=Sc533WBHbzbAbPnubhBv9m9b5TCMsL7PADxKmGRpv4Y%3D=0

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Hi Joel,

I thought there was a way to run the old version even though you were prompted 
to upgrade.

4.16.0 was also using the mirrors.  I just fixed that but if it still doesn't 
work for you the config file might be cached.  4.15.0 installed for me.

HTH,
-Alex

On 5/31/18, 2:16 AM, "Joel Tan"  wrote:

Hi,

Previously I was prompted to upgrade to new version (3.3.1), I click the
upgrade button to upgrade from the existing installer, it doesn't work
after I upgrade to the new version, it has timeout issue once I click the
Next button. I also try to uninstall the installer and reinstall again by
downloading the installer from the web, it still having the same issue
regardless of which version of SDK I choose.

Thanks.

Joel

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Alex Harui 
wrote:

> Hmm, that's interesting.  Does someone have time to try an older version
> of the installer?  I have crappy internet at the moment.
>
> 3.2 is available here: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchive.apache.org%2Fdist%2Fflex%2Finstaller%2F3.2%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4c104c945c0e4d1bc4cc08d5c6d735ea%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633549982502782=S6tdqmORPzdrX9Wojokey7qnUu%2BHLHWVbtMR6rhdv%2FY%3D=0
> binaries/
> 3.3 is available here: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchive.apache.org%2Fdist%2Fflex%2Finstaller%2F3.3%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4c104c945c0e4d1bc4cc08d5c6d735ea%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633549982502782=kTapzVwAvUW%2FdVoiCapQLoj2MA33oRQSa%2Fcj30cFOQs%3D=0
> binaries/
>
> You will probably have to uninstall the 3.3.1 version before installing
> the older version.  Some has gone wonky with the HTTPS code.  Not sure 
what
> it is yet.  Folks can use the binary packages and Apache Ant as an
> alternative.
>
> Get the binary package from 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Fdownload-binaries.html=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4c104c945c0e4d1bc4cc08d5c6d735ea%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633549982502782=snB5lZfTlFrVsmAx5JUw5VugC%2BbwtC2S67O6uB%2BAFZU%3D=0
> Unpack it.
> Run "ant -f installer.xml"
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 5/30/18, 6:43 PM, "Joel Tan"  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am facing the same issue here after upgrading to version 3.3.1 
(Mac).
>
> Joel
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 7:17 AM, oharkins 
> wrote:
>
> > Entire log is:
> >
> > Installer version 3.3.1 (mac)
> > Using Locale: en_US
> > Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
> > Timeout
> > Installation aborted:
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Ftrack-installer.html%
> 3Ffailure%3Dtrue%26label%3DApache=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C77f8dfd71ea64e8ff6e808d5c697eaa3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633278145970805=%2Bh4IvrRp38F4HURH65JJ7RRj8WQQZ
> FDOKqb%2BH3Q4TYs%3D=0 Flex
> > SDK 4.16.1=4.16.1=mac=3.3.1=Timeout
> >
> >
> > I cant get past the first screen, Flex Version 4.16.1
> > Air 29
> > Player 29.0
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.
> com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C77f8dfd71ea64e8ff6e808d5c697
> eaa3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636633278145970805=9ZKYzlh0m5xGXnWDyBOc3aWPCvhN2s
> hl2ACyH9hFS6Y%3D=0
> >
>
>
>

Re: Installer Issue: Host binaries elsewhere?

[Alex Harui]

Free CDN is also a solution.  I could go look at our analytics, but I'm hoping 
some other member of our community will step up and save me the time.  Old Flex 
Board Reports used to tell us about installer downloads.

-Alex

On 5/31/18, 2:03 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:

What kind of data usage are we talking about?

What about open source CDN options?

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.maxcdn.com%2Fopen-source%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5008893e818c44996ed508d5c6d54fab%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633541825301608=GQM14EfzDEzwjdja34IBi6cN20sZFMnNCa4K5AlylQ4%3D=0
 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.maxcdn.com%2Fopen-source%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5008893e818c44996ed508d5c6d54fab%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633541825301608=GQM14EfzDEzwjdja34IBi6cN20sZFMnNCa4K5AlylQ4%3D=0>

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.keycdn.com%2Fopen-source-cdn=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5008893e818c44996ed508d5c6d54fab%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633541825301608=70NWXCLbf57Ca4cNQBSldTF4EzbU4iqTyflLkH8VFcs%3D=0

Harbs

> On May 31, 2018, at 11:51 AM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> Hi Flex PMC.
> 
> As you hopefully know, lots of people are having trouble with the 
installer.  Can someone look to see if we've had any successful 4.16.1 installs 
in the past week or two?
> 
> The issue seems to be about fetching the mirror data over HTTPS.  Not 
sure why it doesn't work.  But one workaround might be to find a volunteer to 
host the binaries elsewhere without a mirror system that we can access over 
HTTP (I don't think HTTPS will work there either).  We might be able to add 
some thanks to the host in the installer.log.
> 
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
> 

Installer Issue: Host binaries elsewhere?

[Alex Harui]

Hi Flex PMC.

As you hopefully know, lots of people are having trouble with the installer.  
Can someone look to see if we've had any successful 4.16.1 installs in the past 
week or two?

The issue seems to be about fetching the mirror data over HTTPS.  Not sure why 
it doesn't work.  But one workaround might be to find a volunteer to host the 
binaries elsewhere without a mirror system that we can access over HTTP (I 
don't think HTTPS will work there either).  We might be able to add some thanks 
to the host in the installer.log.

Thoughts?
-Alex

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

[Alex Harui]

Hmm, that's interesting.  Does someone have time to try an older version of the 
installer?  I have crappy internet at the moment.

3.2 is available here: 
http://archive.apache.org/dist/flex/installer/3.2/binaries/
3.3 is available here: 
http://archive.apache.org/dist/flex/installer/3.3/binaries/

You will probably have to uninstall the 3.3.1 version before installing the 
older version.  Some has gone wonky with the HTTPS code.  Not sure what it is 
yet.  Folks can use the binary packages and Apache Ant as an alternative.  

Get the binary package from http://flex.apache.org/download-binaries.html
Unpack it.
Run "ant -f installer.xml"

HTH,
-Alex

On 5/30/18, 6:43 PM, "Joel Tan"  wrote:

Hi,

I am facing the same issue here after upgrading to version 3.3.1 (Mac).

Joel

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 7:17 AM, oharkins 
wrote:

> Entire log is:
>
> Installer version 3.3.1 (mac)
> Using Locale: en_US
> Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
> Timeout
> Installation aborted:
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Ftrack-installer.html%3Ffailure%3Dtrue%26label%3DApache=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C77f8dfd71ea64e8ff6e808d5c697eaa3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633278145970805=%2Bh4IvrRp38F4HURH65JJ7RRj8WQQZFDOKqb%2BH3Q4TYs%3D=0
 Flex
> SDK 4.16.1=4.16.1=mac=3.3.1=Timeout
>
>
> I cant get past the first screen, Flex Version 4.16.1
> Air 29
> Player 29.0
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C77f8dfd71ea64e8ff6e808d5c697eaa3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636633278145970805=9ZKYzlh0m5xGXnWDyBOc3aWPCvhN2shl2ACyH9hFS6Y%3D=0
>

Re: Flex SDK Installer - is it broken?

[Alex Harui]

Hi Piotr,

I don't think that is the right solution.  Hopefully Nick will notice this 
thread and offer his thoughts.

AIUI, this code is intended to route HTTPS calls through the custom code.  
IIRC, that fixed some issue that was causing Installer failures in other 
situations.  I think your proposed change works because you changed the test so 
that HTTPS calls no longer go through the custom code, but I think that will 
just lead to the original failures.  You could try some code that figures out 
the custom code failed and reverts to trying super.load() as a backup plan, but 
I am more curious as to why that custom code is now failing.

Of course, I could be wrong...
-Alex

On 5/27/18, 2:29 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Alex,

Moved thread to dev.

I just take a look into the installer and found some problem, but not sure
if my fix is appropriate. I'm not sure why it looks like that right now.
[1] Why we have such condition here. Whenever comes url which has been
started from "https" it will be always false, because indexOf returns 0.

I have changed it to indexOf("https://;) != -1 and installer is working,
but not sure if I should commit that.

[1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F2xeQhzC=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc24bf18f2aa5421913c808d5c3b44570%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636630101416589405=lOXAB3omHonChJR%2BpY41vcsB%2F3V45waAxAwadEge1qA%3D=0

Thanks,
Piotr


2018-05-27 11:24 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:

> That list looked reasonable.  I just downloaded the tar.gz and extracted
> the files and before running any scripts there were SWCs in
> frameworks/libs.  If you haven't run any scripts yet, see what is in your
> frameworks/libs.
>
> I think you should run either "ant thirdparty-downloads" or "ant -f
> installer.xml" but maybe not both.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 5/26/18, 10:46 PM, "1600...@gmail.com on behalf of Douglas McCarroll"
> <1600...@gmail.com on behalf of list.apache-flex@brightworks.com>
> wrote:
>
> Alex wrote:
>
> > extract the binary package and before running any scripts post the
> list
> of files at the top level.
>
> Here's the list:
>
> Douglass-MacBook-Pro:apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin douglasmccarroll$ ls
>
> CONTRIBUTING asdoc installer.properties
>
> CONTRIBUTORS bin installer.xml
>
> LICENSE build.properties lib
>
> NOTICE build.xml licenseParts
>
> README env-template.properties samples
>
> RELEASE_NOTES flex-sdk-description.xml templates
>
> ant frameworks
>
> apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml ide
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Delete the folder of extracted files. Then extract the binary
> package and
> > before running any scripts post the list of files at the top level.
> >
> > Get Outlook for 
Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks.protection.outlook=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc24bf18f2aa5421913c808d5c3b44570%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636630101416589405=0%2B57f2GC8UKO6P%2BLhEtneSqVWgw2kd2nh64%2Bl7lGRv4%3D=0.
> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C154c5fcea4314892211a08d5c3953c03%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636629968110222550=2684lfrALyuyzpePuVZiVyWi%
> 2Fz98e4MTBg19Xx9b0vk%3D=0>
> >
> > 
> > From: 1600...@gmail.com <1600...@gmail.com> on behalf of Douglas
> > McCarroll <list.apache-flex@brightworks.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 7:39:49 AM
> > To: Flex-Users (Apache)
> > Subject: Re: Flex SDK Installer - is it broken?
> >
> > Hi Piotr & All,
> >
> > I've downloaded and extracted the apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-bin.tar.gz
> file
> > from the page you specified.
> >
> > As the page suggests, I've run "ant thirdparty-downloads" in the
> frameworks
> > subfolder to install optional dependencies. This runs successfully.
> >
> > When I run "ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=29.0
> > -D

Re: [Announce] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 Released

[Alex Harui]

OK, good to know.  Interestingly, all of those are served by SourceForge.

Glad to know you were finally successful.

-Alex

On 5/9/18, 6:13 PM, "Bink"  wrote:

Thansk Alex.  I was eventually able to make it work using *ant* as you
suggested.

The install failed frequently, when a redirect from HTTP to HTTPS occurred
on a file *get*.  To get around this, I created the local.properties file in
the root directory of Flex.  Then for only the problem files, I would add
properties pointing to a local version of the file I'd downloaded using the
URL reported in the error, like below.  Note, the ones here were the ones I
specifically had issues with.


osmf.url.server=file:///C:/Development/_SDK/
osmf.url.folder=Build
osmf.url.file=OSMF2_0.swc

afe.url.server=file:///C:/Development/_SDK/
afe.url.folder=Build
afe.url.file=afe.jar

agl.url.server=file:///C:/Development/_SDK/
agl.url.folder=Build
agl.url.file=aglj40.jar

fontkit.url.server=file:///C:/Development/_SDK/
fontkit.url.folder=Build
fontkit.url.file=flex-fontkit.jar

rideau.url.server=file:///C:/Development/_SDK/
rideau.url.folder=Build
rideau.url.file=rideau.jar



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9536e6ec58b0452d51dc08d5b61337a0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636615116018821023=fsuOoqslXoiQ%2FhHdwO1RCLgtpulwBZJ0zFgXlHGk48o%3D=0

Re: [Announce] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 Released

[Alex Harui]

Some problems, like the ability to get the CGI script from Apache, affect 
everyone.  Usually that means that the server for the CGI script is having 
problems.

Other problems seem to affect people who are geographically far from the 
servers.  Often they have more success using Apache Ant to install than the 
installer.  But at least one person had to manually download all of the big 
downloads and cache them locally.

So, I think you should try Apache Ant next.  Get the binary artifact, expand 
it, and run "ant -f installer.xml".

HTH,
-Alex

On 5/9/18, 1:59 AM, "Bink"  wrote:

I managed to get to the next stage again.  Disabling the Windows firewall 
has
not helped.  I'm interested to know how you go.  You know, is it everyone,
or just me? 



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C411604d768884e6cbe2108d5b58b25f6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636614531601183617=Gyxp7dkahXKHPJpAVTrLyTr%2BgULjsa2Af9iRQjICosg%3D=0

Re: Unable to build 4.13 SDK with AIR v24 or later on Mac (was Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*)

[Alex Harui]

I think that would be too hard to do, timing-wise.  Just using Ant might be 
better.  Get the binary, unzip it, replace installer.xml, run ant -f 
installer.xml.

-Alex

On 4/23/18, 11:56 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:

Agree with Alex - that probably is the thing.

I would go with following path:
1) Prepare installer.xml from 4.16.1
2) Start downloading 4.13 - once you see that finish downloading SDK - try
to replace it

I'm not sure in what moment installer.xml is being read, but maybe it's
happen after Adobe AIR is being downloaded.

Thanks,
Piotr

2018-04-24 8:49 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:

> I think the issue is that 4.13's script doesn't know about DMG files.  One
> thing to try is to unzip 4.13, replace the installer.xml with one from
> 4.16.1 and see if that works.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/23/18, 10:10 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Phil,
>
> Thanks for looking into that. You can try to fix it on your own and
> make
> pull request!
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 3:31 AM Phil Haeusler <philhaeus...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Piotr
> >
> > FLEX-35384 Raised [1]
> >
> > I don't appear to have the permission to assign issues, so it's
> currently
> > left unassigned.
> >
> > I am using High Sierra.
> >
> > I grabbed the installer code and had a quick look, and it appears
> that the
> > method InstallApacheFlex.unzipAdobeAIRSDKMac() is always calling
> untar() on
> > the downloaded file without taking into account that AIR v24 and
> later is
> > now delivered as a .dmg
> >
> > [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FFLEX-
> 35384=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C390fb45de10d431bf77408d5a9a1
> c0dc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636601434553072833=2%2FVNonnPUmJ189NeM7MFnmkIZ1nNxc
> F1qj9V7Q1lH%2FI%3D=0
> >
> > Thanks
> > Phil
> >
> >
> > On 23 April 2018 at 18:20, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Phil,
> > >
> > > Many Thanks for all of those tests. Can you raise JIRA and assign
> to me
> > [1]
> > > with all your findings. I will try to find some time this month
> and play
> > a
> > > bit with that stuff on my Mac. Are you running High Sierra ?
> > >
> > > [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fprojects%2FFLEX%
> 2Fsummary=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C390fb45de10d431bf77408d5a9a1
> c0dc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636601434553072833=LXwKc1wWPfiGE%2Bgs27eNH0jSMDkdlFGJ9LmyhS5g5b
> Q%3D=0
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > 2018-04-23 5:08 GMT+02:00 Phil Haeusler <philhaeus...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I have done some further investigation into this issue and have
> found
> > > that
> > > > I am unable to successfully build a v4.13 SDK with any AIR
> version
> > after
> > > > v23 using a Mac.
> > > >
> > > > From AIR 24 or later, it appears that the AIR SDK is not 
overlaid
> > > > successfully resulting in a SDK that the installer says is
> packaged
> > > > successfully, but it cannot be used with an IDE.
> > > >
> > > > While i initially discovered this testing the 3.3.1 RC, I have
> since
> > > > switched back to the v3.3 installer and experienced the same
> behaviour.
> > > >
> > > > In my testing I am successfully able to build the 4.13 SDK with
> AIR 20,
> > > 21
> > > > and 23.
> > > >
> > > > I've run 2 tests packaging with AIR 22 but both times the
> installer
> > > errors

Re: Unable to build 4.13 SDK with AIR v24 or later on Mac (was Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*)

[Alex Harui]

I think the issue is that 4.13's script doesn't know about DMG files.  One 
thing to try is to unzip 4.13, replace the installer.xml with one from 4.16.1 
and see if that works.

HTH,
-Alex

On 4/23/18, 10:10 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Phil,

Thanks for looking into that. You can try to fix it on your own and make
pull request!

Thanks,
Piotr

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 3:31 AM Phil Haeusler  wrote:

> Hi Piotr
>
> FLEX-35384 Raised [1]
>
> I don't appear to have the permission to assign issues, so it's currently
> left unassigned.
>
> I am using High Sierra.
>
> I grabbed the installer code and had a quick look, and it appears that the
> method InstallApacheFlex.unzipAdobeAIRSDKMac() is always calling untar() 
on
> the downloaded file without taking into account that AIR v24 and later is
> now delivered as a .dmg
>
> [1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FFLEX-35384=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C390fb45de10d431bf77408d5a9a1c0dc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601434553072833=2%2FVNonnPUmJ189NeM7MFnmkIZ1nNxcF1qj9V7Q1lH%2FI%3D=0
>
> Thanks
> Phil
>
>
> On 23 April 2018 at 18:20, Piotr Zarzycki 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > Many Thanks for all of those tests. Can you raise JIRA and assign to me
> [1]
> > with all your findings. I will try to find some time this month and play
> a
> > bit with that stuff on my Mac. Are you running High Sierra ?
> >
> > [1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fprojects%2FFLEX%2Fsummary=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C390fb45de10d431bf77408d5a9a1c0dc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601434553072833=LXwKc1wWPfiGE%2Bgs27eNH0jSMDkdlFGJ9LmyhS5g5bQ%3D=0
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-04-23 5:08 GMT+02:00 Phil Haeusler :
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I have done some further investigation into this issue and have found
> > that
> > > I am unable to successfully build a v4.13 SDK with any AIR version
> after
> > > v23 using a Mac.
> > >
> > > From AIR 24 or later, it appears that the AIR SDK is not overlaid
> > > successfully resulting in a SDK that the installer says is packaged
> > > successfully, but it cannot be used with an IDE.
> > >
> > > While i initially discovered this testing the 3.3.1 RC, I have since
> > > switched back to the v3.3 installer and experienced the same 
behaviour.
> > >
> > > In my testing I am successfully able to build the 4.13 SDK with AIR 
20,
> > 21
> > > and 23.
> > >
> > > I've run 2 tests packaging with AIR 22 but both times the installer
> > errors
> > > out and leaves a 1.5gig directory.  This errors attempting to retrieve
> > > playerglobal_22.swc and leaves the in/ folder on disk.  I'm not
> concerned
> > > about this failure as part of my current issue.
> > >
> > > Then for AIR 24 through 29, the installer reports a successfully
> created
> > > SDK, however in all cases the AIR SDK hasn't been overlaid - resulting
> > in a
> > > SDK directory that cannot be used for development.
> > >
> > > Here's a snapshot of the folder sizes of each of the SDK packages i've
> > > tried creating.
> > >
> > > 556M flex413air20
> > >
> > > 569M flex413air21
> > >
> > > 1.5G flex413air22
> > >
> > > 534M flex413air23
> > >
> > > 125M flex413air24
> > >
> > > 125M flex413air25
> > >
> > > 125M flex413air26
> > >
> > > 125M flex413air27
> > >
> > > 125M flex413air28
> > >
> > > 125M flex413air29
> > >
> > > Reading through the installer.log for the AIR 23 vs AIR 24 builds, the
> > only
> > > difference i can see is that from v24 onwards, the AIR SDK is
> downloaded
> > as
> > > a .dmg file rather than a .tbz2 file
> > >
> > > i.e.
> > > AIR 23 - Downloading Adobe AIR Runtime Kit for Mac from:
> > > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fairdownload.adobe.com%2Fair%2Fmac%2Fdownload%2F23.0%2F%2FAdobeAIRSDK.tbz2=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C390fb45de10d431bf77408d5a9a1c0dc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601434553072833=O%2Bwbdhk%2FNE%2FShB%2FquTK9bAeDRFCVp25xwz%2FOYK%2FCh6E%3D=0
> > >
> > > AIR 24 - Downloading Adobe AIR Runtime Kit for Mac from:
> > > 

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

[Alex Harui]

FWIW, I confirmed with the author that this code is Adobe-owned.  Consider it 
"donated".

Thanks,
-Alex

On 4/20/18, 8:36 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:

When I will be next time RM in Flex or Royale project and license issue
occur I'm not going to wait for answer, but immediately raise Legal jira.
Right now it is a waste of our time to make an attention to something which
seems to do not going to bring us any problems with law.

Does that make sense ?

2018-04-20 17:20 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:

> You are going to make up copyright law by having an "or" in the copyright
> statement and somehow think that makes things better?
>
> The release has the ASF header for this file.  I believe Adobe owns this
> code.   I believe have the right to donate this code on behalf of Adobe.
> The release is therefore correct.  Does anybody else disagree?  I don't
> think your changes of adding an "or" are conformant to copyright law
> anywhere.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/20/18, 12:00 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > IMO, we'd be better off having these files donated to Apache so the
> header
> > does not need to change.  There is no need to keep it as third-party
> since
> > the original author hasn't touched it in years.  I'm pretty sure it
> is ok
> > for me to just say it is owned by Adobe and thus donated.   We've
> done
> > this in the past without a whole SGA.  It is just a couple of files.
>
> I’ve changed the headers IMO it better to comply with ASF legal policy
> than not to. If you want retroactively get them donated I believe you 
would
> need to confirm that Adobe does own the copyright and check on legal
> discuss if that’s OK. I’ll change the headers back to ASF ones for you if
> they need to be.
>
> I put the copyright as "Copyright 2011 Piotr Walczyszyn or Adobe” as
> although he was working for Adobe at the time this was his personal blog
> and I don’t know the what the terms of his contact with Adobe was or how
> employee/employer copyright ownership works under Polish copyright law. 
(He
> was based in Poland according to his blog.)
>
> Re "There is no need to keep it as third-party since the original
> author hasn't touched it in years.” I think you find that copyright lasts 
a
> little longer than that :-) I’ve no idea what it is in Poland but here 
(and
> the US) it’s life of the author + 70 years.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8addf80cbb874dad350008d5a6d476b5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598353810889864=xtr3InvAhOKjB9cz3HJWjey54eEWJFxtGX15oNv2pnI%3D=0

<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8addf80cbb874dad350008d5a6d476b5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598353810889864=xtr3InvAhOKjB9cz3HJWjey54eEWJFxtGX15oNv2pnI%3D=0>*

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

[Alex Harui]

You are going to make up copyright law by having an "or" in the copyright 
statement and somehow think that makes things better?

The release has the ASF header for this file.  I believe Adobe owns this code.  
 I believe have the right to donate this code on behalf of Adobe.  The release 
is therefore correct.  Does anybody else disagree?  I don't think your changes 
of adding an "or" are conformant to copyright law anywhere.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 4/20/18, 12:00 AM, "Justin Mclean"  wrote:

Hi,

> IMO, we'd be better off having these files donated to Apache so the header
> does not need to change.  There is no need to keep it as third-party since
> the original author hasn't touched it in years.  I'm pretty sure it is ok
> for me to just say it is owned by Adobe and thus donated.   We've done
> this in the past without a whole SGA.  It is just a couple of files.

I’ve changed the headers IMO it better to comply with ASF legal policy than 
not to. If you want retroactively get them donated I believe you would need to 
confirm that Adobe does own the copyright and check on legal discuss if that’s 
OK. I’ll change the headers back to ASF ones for you if they need to be.

I put the copyright as "Copyright 2011 Piotr Walczyszyn or Adobe” as 
although he was working for Adobe at the time this was his personal blog and I 
don’t know the what the terms of his contact with Adobe was or how 
employee/employer copyright ownership works under Polish copyright law. (He was 
based in Poland according to his blog.)

Re "There is no need to keep it as third-party since the original author 
hasn't touched it in years.” I think you find that copyright lasts a little 
longer than that :-) I’ve no idea what it is in Poland but here (and the US) 
it’s life of the author + 70 years.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3

[Alex Harui]

Hi Piotr,

We've always made this an official release in the past.  I don't see any
need to change that.  Interestingly I found forks of the source on GitHub.
 It might be used for installing other apps.

AIUI, the 72 hours is not a requirement, just a recommended practice.  It
is ok that you moved the bits to the release server.  The last set of
changes were not functional anyway.   We can just wait a bit before
announcing.  Either way we can see if folks are actually having success
running the installer.  But we should eventually make put the source on
the mirrors.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 4/19/18, 11:22 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi Maxim,
>
>You are right :) However we are actually not releasing sources, so that
>VOTE is just for US as I understand.
>
>Piotr
>
>2018-04-20 8:11 GMT+02:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello Piotr,
>>
>> I believe the official VOTE should last 72 hours minimum 
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Passed.
>> >
>> > Result 3 +1 binding votes and 1 +1 from community!
>> >
>> > Thanks guys!
>> >
>> >
>> > 2018-04-19 21:16 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>> >
>> >> +1 Binding
>> >> Package
>> >> 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
>>che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Finstaller%2F3.3.1%2F=02%7C01%7
>>Caharui%40adobe.com%7C08ec980957c148fe78e808d5a6872cd9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b344387
>>94aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598021929823566=3svtSummZt0CWAWRmzuml
>>1vG8dnfzym8ClWyX0Ksp%2Fg%3D=0
>> >> rc3/apache-flex
>> >> -sdk-installer-3.3.1-src.tar.gz
>> >> Java 1.8
>> >> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.12.5
>> >> Source kit signatures match: y
>> >> Source kit builds: y
>> >> README is ok: y
>> >> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
>> >> NOTICE is ok: y
>> >> LICENSE is ok: y
>> >> No unapproved licenses or archives: y
>> >> No unapproved binaries: y
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 4/19/18, 11:47 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>> Muppirala"
>> >> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >+1 Binding
>> >> >
>> >> >On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
>> >> ><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> +1 (Binding)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - I was able to build from sources
>> >> >> - Downloading newest version of SDK went well on Mac and Windows
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> Piotr
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2018-04-19 16:05 GMT+02:00 Fréderic Cox <coxfrede...@gmail.com>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > +1 | installer is working for me on both Windows and Mac
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <
>> >> >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > > Hello,
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > This is official thread for Vote to approve Apache Flex SDK
>> >> >>Installer
>> >> >> > > version 3.3.1 to be released.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Release candidate contains fix for issue [1].
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Changes in RC3:
>> >> >> > > - Update RELEASE_NOTES
>> >> >> > > - Fixed year in some files
>> >> >> > > - Fixes related to licenses
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > In order to test fix install on installer on Windows and
>>download
>> >> >> newest
>> >> >> > > Apache Flex SDK with newest Adobe Flash/Air version.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Sources can be found:
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
>> >> >>che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Finstaller%2F3.
>> >> 3.1%2Frc3%2F=02%
>>