[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5325) iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

2010-06-11 Thread Rex Wang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12877725#action_12877725
 ] 

Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-5325:


I think it's pretty hard to replace the iframe with div, and also make our 
console code more complex, and more bugs will be involved. My intent is to make 
our console's structure more clear and easy to maintain. It is just an admin 
console with the specified user and not a widely-used web application by the 
people all-over the world(like GMail), so I think it make sense to do such 
changes..

 iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
 ---

 Key: GERONIMO-5325
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Rex Wang
Assignee: Ben Liang
 Fix For: 2.2.1

 Attachments: 5325-Ben_2_new.patch, 5325_Ben.patch, 
 screenshot-1-assembly-portlet.jpg, screenshot-debug-views.jpg, 
 screenshot-huge-blank.jpg


 #1. The assemble server page is not formatting properly in 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT. Go 
 to assemble server page, click expert user and try to scroll down. Unless I 
 make the font type very small, I can't see the system plugins and can't 
 scroll down to them. 
 #2, This also cause the debugviews portlet displays incorrectly.
 #3, Go to repository portlet first, and then go to JMS Resources portlet. The 
 scroll bar is pretty long and when you scroll down, you can see  there is a 
 huge blank at the bottom of the page.
 See the attachment.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5325) iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

2010-06-11 Thread Ben Liang
Actuall, now  every time reload the page the navagation tree node will open
according to the url.

I think the user may want to check a portlet and those portlets in the same
group.

So if we have made a good category then the user will feel it easy to find
the related portlets.

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:

 To revert the iframe.  Each click will result in a whole dojo tree reload.
   The most important thing is that the user context will lost.

 In addition, the problems described in this JIRA is easy to fix.
 Including the timeout bug.   I'll find a time to get them done.

 Please hold on this patch.

 On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Rex Wang (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:


[
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12877725#action_12877725]

 Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-5325:
 

 I think it's pretty hard to replace the iframe with div, and also make our
 console code more complex, and more bugs will be involved. My intent is to
 make our console's structure more clear and easy to maintain. It is just an
 admin console with the specified user and not a widely-used web
 application by the people all-over the world(like GMail), so I think it make
 sense to do such changes..

  iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
  ---
 
  Key: GERONIMO-5325
  URL:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325
  Project: Geronimo
   Issue Type: Bug
   Security Level: public(Regular issues)
 Affects Versions: 2.2
 Reporter: Rex Wang
 Assignee: Ben Liang
  Fix For: 2.2.1
 
  Attachments: 5325-Ben_2_new.patch, 5325_Ben.patch,
 screenshot-1-assembly-portlet.jpg, screenshot-debug-views.jpg,
 screenshot-huge-blank.jpg
 
 
  #1. The assemble server page is not formatting properly in
 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT. Go to assemble server page, click expert user and try to
 scroll down. Unless I make the font type very small, I can't see the system
 plugins and can't scroll down to them.
  #2, This also cause the debugviews portlet displays incorrectly.
  #3, Go to repository portlet first, and then go to JMS Resources
 portlet. The scroll bar is pretty long and when you scroll down, you can see
  there is a huge blank at the bottom of the page.
  See the attachment.

 --
 This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
 -
 You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.




 --
 Shawn




-- 
Best Regards
Ben Liang


[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5376) OpenEJB failover failed

2010-06-11 Thread Ivan (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12877737#action_12877737
 ] 

Ivan commented on GERONIMO-5376:


1. I opened a JIRA OpenEJB-1297, and David has kindly fixed the issue in the 
trunk, it should be ported to 3.1.3 branch soon.
2. openejb.client.requestretry system property is need to configured on the 
client side, or we could get an exception in the first call after the last 
server is down
3. The configuration in the description is not correctly, you might refer to 
the https://cwiki.apache.org/OPENEJBx30/failover.html.

 OpenEJB failover failed 
 

 Key: GERONIMO-5376
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: OpenEJB
Affects Versions: 2.2.1
 Environment: windows 2003, suse10 sp2, redhat 5.3
 jdk: sun 1.6.10
Reporter: viola.lu
Assignee: Ivan
 Fix For: 2.2.1

 Attachments: loadbean.zip


 Server 1: window 2003, viola-dev
 Server 2: suse 10 sp2, suse10sp268
 Server 3: redhat 5.3, rhel53x86
 1. Add MultipointServers=suse10sp268:4212  to server 1
 2. Add MultipointServers=rhel53x86:4212 to server 2
 3. Add MultipointServers=rhel53x86:4212 to server 3
 4.Deploy loadbean interface to server 1. deploy loadbean implementation to 
 server 2, server 3
 Deploy a openejb client servlet to server 1 which call server 2. server 3
  
 p.setProperty(Context.PROVIDER_URL,failover:ejbd://suse10sp2:4201,ejbd://rhel53x86:4201);
 5.Shutdown server 2, it should failover to server 3, but failed, server  1 
 reported errors:
 Invalid response from server -1.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5325) iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

2010-06-11 Thread Ben Liang (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ben Liang updated GERONIMO-5325:


Attachment: Two scroll bars.jpg

 iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
 ---

 Key: GERONIMO-5325
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Rex Wang
Assignee: Ben Liang
 Fix For: 2.2.1

 Attachments: 5325-Ben_2_new.patch, 5325_Ben.patch, 
 screenshot-1-assembly-portlet.jpg, screenshot-debug-views.jpg, 
 screenshot-huge-blank.jpg, timeout.bmp, Two scroll bars.jpg


 #1. The assemble server page is not formatting properly in 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT. Go 
 to assemble server page, click expert user and try to scroll down. Unless I 
 make the font type very small, I can't see the system plugins and can't 
 scroll down to them. 
 #2, This also cause the debugviews portlet displays incorrectly.
 #3, Go to repository portlet first, and then go to JMS Resources portlet. The 
 scroll bar is pretty long and when you scroll down, you can see  there is a 
 huge blank at the bottom of the page.
 See the attachment.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5325) iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

2010-06-11 Thread Rex Wang
Yes, Ben and I have noticed the context problem of the dojo tree, and IMHO
the current solution is acceptable :-) It's really boring in fixing such
small bugs in console after pulling in the iframe, That should not be the
focus of our geronimo. Besides the issues we list in the jira, I also found
a lot of other small problems, so let's get rid of it one time.

2010/6/11 Ben Liang ben.liang.j...@gmail.com

 Actuall, now  every time reload the page the navagation tree node will open
 according to the url.

 I think the user may want to check a portlet and those portlets in the same
 group.

 So if we have made a good category then the user will feel it easy to find
 the related portlets.


 On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:

 To revert the iframe.  Each click will result in a whole dojo tree reload.
   The most important thing is that the user context will lost.

 In addition, the problems described in this JIRA is easy to fix.
 Including the timeout bug.   I'll find a time to get them done.

 Please hold on this patch.

 On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Rex Wang (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:


[
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12877725#action_12877725]

 Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-5325:
 

 I think it's pretty hard to replace the iframe with div, and also make
 our console code more complex, and more bugs will be involved. My intent is
 to make our console's structure more clear and easy to maintain. It is just
 an admin console with the specified user and not a widely-used web
 application by the people all-over the world(like GMail), so I think it make
 sense to do such changes..

  iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
  ---
 
  Key: GERONIMO-5325
  URL:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325
  Project: Geronimo
   Issue Type: Bug
   Security Level: public(Regular issues)
 Affects Versions: 2.2
 Reporter: Rex Wang
 Assignee: Ben Liang
  Fix For: 2.2.1
 
  Attachments: 5325-Ben_2_new.patch, 5325_Ben.patch,
 screenshot-1-assembly-portlet.jpg, screenshot-debug-views.jpg,
 screenshot-huge-blank.jpg
 
 
  #1. The assemble server page is not formatting properly in
 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT. Go to assemble server page, click expert user and try to
 scroll down. Unless I make the font type very small, I can't see the system
 plugins and can't scroll down to them.
  #2, This also cause the debugviews portlet displays incorrectly.
  #3, Go to repository portlet first, and then go to JMS Resources
 portlet. The scroll bar is pretty long and when you scroll down, you can see
  there is a huge blank at the bottom of the page.
  See the attachment.

 --
 This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
 -
 You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.




 --
 Shawn




 --
 Best Regards
 Ben Liang




-- 
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org


Re: Release new javamail components.

2010-06-11 Thread Ivan
Seems that the parent pom of all the java mail modules is still
genesis-java5-flava, I am thinking that we still need to compile the
artifacts with Java 5 ?
I tried to compile the modules with Java 5, but get some errors, with Java
6, all build OK.

2010/6/9 Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com

 This is a bug fix release to fix a major problem with using the javamail
 code on EBCDIC-based platforms.  The JIRA in question is

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5326

 This is a single vote for new versions of the javamail spec, providers, and
 mail uber-jar.

 The 3 components up for vote are:

 geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1
 geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider-1.8.1
 geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8.1

  Vote will be open for 72 hours.

  [ ] +1  approve
  [ ] +0  no opinion
  [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


 Staging repo:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-044/

 The source repos are:


 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1

 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.1

 Rick






-- 
Ivan


[WS-Security] Axis2/Tomcat (patches available)

2010-06-11 Thread rahul.soa
Hello Devs,

As you know, I worked on enabling ws-security in CXF/Jetty last year during
my Google Summer of Code (its still going via jira GERONIMO-4642). I have
been trying to understand the Axis2/tomcat part in Geronimo in past several
days. I thought of starting some work on it. Hence I created a new jira
GERONIMO-5366 dedicated to this. I have attached two patches on this jira
last night.

*Patch:1 RampartModule.txt:* This will bring the required Rampart module in
Axis2/Geronimo.
*Patch:2 WebServiceSecurity_ClientSide.txt:* This patch will allow user to
set the ws-security at Client side to send the secure messages
(UsernameToken, Signature, Encryption)

More details on the above patches are on the JIRA 5366

Please kindly review those patches, and apply them.

Many Thanks for your help and support. Look forward to seeing your feedback.

Rahul


[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5325) iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

2010-06-11 Thread Rex Wang (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-5325:
---

Attachment: screenshot-timeout.jpg

 iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
 ---

 Key: GERONIMO-5325
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Rex Wang
Assignee: Ben Liang
 Fix For: 2.2.1

 Attachments: 5325-Ben_2_new.patch, 5325_Ben.patch, 
 screenshot-1-assembly-portlet.jpg, screenshot-debug-views.jpg, 
 screenshot-huge-blank.jpg, screenshot-timeout.jpg, timeout.bmp, Two scroll 
 bars.jpg


 #1. The assemble server page is not formatting properly in 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT. Go 
 to assemble server page, click expert user and try to scroll down. Unless I 
 make the font type very small, I can't see the system plugins and can't 
 scroll down to them. 
 #2, This also cause the debugviews portlet displays incorrectly.
 #3, Go to repository portlet first, and then go to JMS Resources portlet. The 
 scroll bar is pretty long and when you scroll down, you can see  there is a 
 huge blank at the bottom of the page.
 See the attachment.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 953558

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953558 built with tests included
 
See the full build-0200.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100611/build-0200.log
 
Download the binaries from 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100611
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO] 
[INFO] Total time: 26 minutes 28 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Jun 11 03:09:29 EDT 2010
[INFO] Final Memory: 284M/937M
[INFO] 
 
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=
 
Assembly: tomcat
=
See full test results and logs at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100611/logs-0200-tomcat/
 
[INFO] Running console-testsuite.basic-console
[INFO] Tests run: 38, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 94.802 
sec  FAILURE!
[INFO] Running console-testsuite.advance-test
[INFO] Tests run: 15, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 78.246 
sec  FAILURE!
--
[INFO] Running sec-testsuite.security
[INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.277 
sec  FAILURE!
--
[INFO] Running security-testsuite.security
[INFO] Tests run: 36, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 31.759 
sec  FAILURE!
 
Assembly: jetty
=
See full test results and logs at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100611/logs-0200-jetty/
 
[INFO] Running console-testsuite.basic-console
[INFO] Tests run: 38, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 99.336 
sec  FAILURE!
[INFO] Running console-testsuite.advance-test
[INFO] Tests run: 15, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 80.35 
sec  FAILURE!
--
[INFO] Running sec-testsuite.security
[INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.781 
sec  FAILURE!
 
Samples: branches/2.1
=
Log: 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100611/samples-0200.log
 
Build status: FAILED
 


[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 953585

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953585 built with tests included
 
See the full build-0300.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611/build-0300.log
 
Download the binaries from 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO] 
[INFO] Total time: 39 minutes 50 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Jun 11 03:45:57 EDT 2010
[INFO] Final Memory: 606M/1007M
[INFO] 
 
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=
 
Assembly: tomcat
=
See full test results and logs at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611/logs-0300-tomcat/
 
Running TestSuite
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.845 sec  
FAILURE!
 
[INFO] [surefire:test {execution: default-test}]
[INFO] Tests are skipped.
[INFO] [war:war {execution: default-war}]
[INFO] Packaging webapp
[INFO] Assembling webapp[appname-war] in 
[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Processing war project
[INFO] Copying webapp 
webResources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/src/main/webapp]
 
to[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Copying webapp 
webResources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/classes]
 
to[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Copying webapp 
resources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/src/main/webapp]
[INFO] Building jar: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] Webapp assembled in[51 msecs]
[INFO] Building war: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
[INFO] [failsafe:integration-test {execution: integration-test}]
[INFO] Failsafe report directory: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/failsafe-reports

---
 T E S T S
---
There are no tests to run.

Results :

Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[WARNING] Skipping verification of legal files in artifacts:
[WARNING] org.apache.geronimo.testsuite:appname-war:war:3.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] [install:install {execution: default-install}]
[INFO] Installing 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
 to 
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/appname-war/3.0-SNAPSHOT/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
[INFO] [failsafe:verify {execution: verify}]
[INFO] Failsafe report directory: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/failsafe-reports
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Geronimo TestSuite :: Enterprise Testsuite :: AppName - Client
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO] 
[INFO] [genesis:validate-configuration {execution: default}]
[INFO] [geronimo-property:set-property {execution: set-property}]
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources {execution: default-resources}]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 2 resources
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/main/filtered-resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:compile {execution: default-compile}]
[INFO] Compiling 1 source file to 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/target/classes
[INFO] [resources:testResources {execution: default-testResources}]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/test/resources
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/test/filtered-resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:testCompile {execution: default-testCompile}]
[INFO

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5325) iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly

2010-06-11 Thread Shawn Jiang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1280#action_1280
 ] 

Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-5325:
---

Fixed the problems described in this JIRA.  Thanks Ben and Rex for the help !

Repository  RevisionDateUserMessage
ASF #953636 Fri Jun 11 05:57:49 EDT 2010genspring   GERONIMO-5325 
iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
Files Changed
MODIFY 
/geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/debugviews/debugviews-portlets/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/view/classloaderview/view.jsp
 
MODIFY 
/geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/debugviews/debugviews-portlets/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/view/dependencyview/view.jsp
 
MODIFY 
/geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/debugviews/debugviews-portlets/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/view/jndiview/view.jsp
 
MODIFY 
/geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/console/console-portal-driver/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/themes/portlets-with-tree.jsp
 
MODIFY 
/geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/console/console-portal-driver/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/themes/navigation.jsp
 

Repository  RevisionDateUserMessage
ASF #953642 Fri Jun 11 06:28:59 EDT 2010genspring   GERONIMO-5325 
iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
Files Changed
MODIFY 
/geronimo/server/trunk/plugins/console/console-portal-driver/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/themes/navigation.jsp
 
MODIFY 
/geronimo/server/trunk/plugins/debugviews/debugviews-portlets/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/view/dependencyview/view.jsp
MODIFY 
/geronimo/server/trunk/plugins/debugviews/debugviews-portlets/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/view/jndiview/view.jsp
 
MODIFY 
/geronimo/server/trunk/plugins/debugviews/debugviews-portlets/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/view/classloaderview/view.jsp
 
MODIFY 
/geronimo/server/trunk/plugins/console/console-portal-driver/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/themes/portlets-with-tree.jsp
 


 iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
 ---

 Key: GERONIMO-5325
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Rex Wang
Assignee: Ben Liang
 Fix For: 2.2.1

 Attachments: 5325-Ben_2_new.patch, 5325_Ben.patch, 
 screenshot-1-assembly-portlet.jpg, screenshot-debug-views.jpg, 
 screenshot-huge-blank.jpg, screenshot-timeout.jpg, timeout.bmp, Two scroll 
 bars.jpg


 #1. The assemble server page is not formatting properly in 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT. Go 
 to assemble server page, click expert user and try to scroll down. Unless I 
 make the font type very small, I can't see the system plugins and can't 
 scroll down to them. 
 #2, This also cause the debugviews portlet displays incorrectly.
 #3, Go to repository portlet first, and then go to JMS Resources portlet. The 
 scroll bar is pretty long and when you scroll down, you can see  there is a 
 huge blank at the bottom of the page.
 See the attachment.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Release new javamail components -- second attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Rick McGuire
This is a bug fix release to fix a major problem with using the javamail 
code on EBCDIC-based platforms.  The JIRA in question is


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5326

The second attempt version also corrects the Java 5 compilation errors 
encountered with the first attempt.


This is a single vote for new versions of the javamail spec, providers, 
and mail uber-jar.


The 3 components up for vote are:

geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1
geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider-1.8.1
geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8.1

 Vote will be open for 72 hours.

 [ ] +1  approve
 [ ] +0  no opinion
 [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Staging repo:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-048/

The source repos are:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1 

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.1 



Rick




[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 953665

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953665 built with tests included
 
See the full build-0800.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100611/build-0800.log
 
 
See the unit test reports at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100611/unit-test-reports
 
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//org/springframework/spring-jms/2.5.6/spring-jms-2.5.6.jar
190K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repo.fusesource.com/maven2/commons-pool/commons-pool/1.5.4/commons-pool-1.5.4.jar
Downloading: 
http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external/commons-pool/commons-pool/1.5.4/commons-pool-1.5.4.jar
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//commons-pool/commons-pool/1.5.4/commons-pool-1.5.4.jar
93K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//org/springframework/spring-context-support/2.5.6/spring-context-support-2.5.6.jar
94K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-pool/5.4-SNAPSHOT/activemq-pool-5.4-SNAPSHOT.jar
35K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external/rome/rome/0.8/rome-0.8.jar
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//rome/rome/0.8/rome-0.8.jar
192K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external/org/springframework/spring-webmvc/3.0.1.RELEASE/spring-webmvc-3.0.1.RELEASE.jar
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//org/springframework/spring-webmvc/3.0.1.RELEASE/spring-webmvc-3.0.1.RELEASE.jar
388K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//stax/stax/1.2.0/stax-1.2.0.jar
175K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external/xmlpull/xmlpull/1.1.3.4d_b4_min/xmlpull-1.1.3.4d_b4_min.jar
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//xmlpull/xmlpull/1.1.3.4d_b4_min/xmlpull-1.1.3.4d_b4_min.jar
23K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-xmpp/5.4-SNAPSHOT/activemq-xmpp-5.4-SNAPSHOT.jar
173K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/2/org/codehaus/woodstox/woodstox-core-asl/4.0.7/woodstox-core-asl-4.0.7.jar
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1/org.codehaus.woodstox/jars/woodstox-core-asl-4.0.7.jar
Downloading: 
http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external/org/codehaus/woodstox/woodstox-core-asl/4.0.7/woodstox-core-asl-4.0.7.jar
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//org/codehaus/woodstox/woodstox-core-asl/4.0.7/woodstox-core-asl-4.0.7.jar
471K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/2/org/codehaus/woodstox/stax2-api/3.0.1/stax2-api-3.0.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1/org.codehaus.woodstox/jars/stax2-api-3.0.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external/org/codehaus/woodstox/stax2-api/3.0.1/stax2-api-3.0.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//org/codehaus/woodstox/stax2-api/3.0.1/stax2-api-3.0.1.jar
175K downloaded
[WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Checksum failed on download: local = 
'12393455d7d25eab09bb9b2043b6df13406ec70d'; remote = 
'88985bfab2394cf8e56fcbd97cd44f7cac7bf8ca' - RETRYING
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//org/codehaus/woodstox/stax2-api/3.0.1/stax2-api-3.0.1.jar
175K downloaded
[WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Checksum failed on download: local = 
'12393455d7d25eab09bb9b2043b6df13406ec70d'; remote = 
'88985bfab2394cf8e56fcbd97cd44f7cac7bf8ca' - IGNORING
Downloading: 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-console/5.4-SNAPSHOT/activemq-console-5.4-SNAPSHOT.jar
109K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repo.fusesource.com/maven2/net/sf/josql/josql/1.5/josql-1.5.jar
193K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repo.fusesource.com/maven2/net/sf/josql/gentlyweb-utils/1.5/gentlyweb-utils-1.5.jar
67K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//opensymphony/sitemesh/2.2.1/sitemesh-2.2.1.jar
130K downloaded
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-webconsole-jetty/src/main/resources
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-webconsole-jetty/src/main/filtered-resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [car:validate-configuration]
[INFO] [car:prepare-plan]
[INFO] Generated: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-webconsole-jetty/target/work/plan.xml
[INFO] [car:verify-no-dependency-change]
[INFO] 
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] 
[INFO

Re: Release new javamail components -- second attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Donald Woods
+1

Built both artifacts from source.
Jars contained correct looking License/Notice files.
RAT returned some hits, but they were not new files and were mostly for
provider and test files.  Can we get some excludes added for future
releases?


-Donald


On 6/11/10 6:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
 This is a bug fix release to fix a major problem with using the javamail
 code on EBCDIC-based platforms.  The JIRA in question is
 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5326
 
 The second attempt version also corrects the Java 5 compilation errors
 encountered with the first attempt.
 
 This is a single vote for new versions of the javamail spec, providers,
 and mail uber-jar.
 
 The 3 components up for vote are:
 
 geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1
 geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider-1.8.1
 geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8.1
 
  Vote will be open for 72 hours.
 
  [ ] +1  approve
  [ ] +0  no opinion
  [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
 
 
 Staging repo:
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-048/
 
 The source repos are:
 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1
 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.1
 
 
 Rick
 
 
 


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Donald Woods
+1  as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release.

Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.


-Donald


On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
 +0.5
 
 M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
 the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
 be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
 setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
 var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
 following in var/config/config.xml:
 
 attribute name=ServerUrltcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
 PortOffset}/attribute
 
 to
 
 attribute name=ServerUrltcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
 PortOffset}/attribute
 
 Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
 server startup by the activemq plugin.
 
 M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
 error from time to time.
 
 Jarek
 
 On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
 A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE problem has
 been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been
 included.

 See the JIRA issues here:

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220

 Staged to

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/

 The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz

 If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
 plausible builds from them.

 The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.

 [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
 [  ]  0 no opinion
 [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

 Rick

 


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Donald,

I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried with
Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK 1.6.0_20.  Which
version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the tag?


On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:

 +1  as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release.

 Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.


 -Donald


 On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
  +0.5
 
  M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
  the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
  be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
  setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
  var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
  following in var/config/config.xml:
 
  attribute name=ServerUrltcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
  PortOffset}/attribute
 
  to
 
  attribute name=ServerUrltcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
  PortOffset}/attribute
 
  Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
  server startup by the activemq plugin.
 
  M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
  error from time to time.
 
  Jarek
 
  On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
  A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE problem
 has
  been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have
 been
  included.
 
  See the JIRA issues here:
 
 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220
 
  Staged to
 
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
 
  The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
 
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
 
  If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
  plausible builds from them.
 
  The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
 
  [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
  [  ]  0 no opinion
  [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
 
  Rick
 
 




-- 
Vamsi


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Donald Woods
Those versions on Mac

What problem did you encounter?  Did you run the bootstrap build first?
mvn install -Dstage=bootstrap
mvn install


-Donald


On 6/11/10 12:33 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
 Donald,
 
 I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried
 with Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK
 1.6.0_20.  Which version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the
 tag?
 
 
 On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
 mailto:dwo...@apache.org wrote:
 
 +1  as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release.
 
 Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.
 
 
 -Donald
 
 
 On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
  +0.5
 
  M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
  the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
  be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
  setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
  var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
  following in var/config/config.xml:
 
  attribute name=ServerUrltcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
  PortOffset}/attribute
 
  to
 
  attribute name=ServerUrltcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
  PortOffset}/attribute
 
  Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
  server startup by the activemq plugin.
 
  M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
  error from time to time.
 
  Jarek
 
  On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com
 mailto:rick...@gmail.com wrote:
  A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE
 problem has
  been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek
 noticed have been
  included.
 
  See the JIRA issues here:
 
 
 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220
 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220
 
  Staged to
 
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
 
  The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
 
 
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
 
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
 
  If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
  plausible builds from them.
 
  The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
 
  [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
  [  ]  0 no opinion
  [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
 
  Rick
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Vamsi


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

2010-06-11 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Ah... missed the bootstrap build step :D .  The build seems to run fine now.
Will post again if it fails. Thanks Donald.

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:

 Those versions on Mac

 What problem did you encounter?  Did you run the bootstrap build first?
 mvn install -Dstage=bootstrap
 mvn install


 -Donald


 On 6/11/10 12:33 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
  Donald,
 
  I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried
  with Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK
  1.6.0_20.  Which version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the
  tag?
 
 
  On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
  mailto:dwo...@apache.org wrote:
 
  +1  as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone
 release.
 
  Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.
 
 
  -Donald
 
 
  On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
   +0.5
  
   M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind
 to
   the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you
 won't
   be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
   setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
   var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing
 the
   following in var/config/config.xml:
  
   attribute name=ServerUrltcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort
 +
   PortOffset}/attribute
  
   to
  
   attribute name=ServerUrltcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
   PortOffset}/attribute
  
   Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated
 at
   server startup by the activemq plugin.
  
   M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
   error from time to time.
  
   Jarek
  
   On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com
  mailto:rick...@gmail.com wrote:
   A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE
  problem has
   been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek
  noticed have been
   included.
  
   See the JIRA issues here:
  
  
 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220
  
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090styleName=TextprojectId=10220
 
  
   Staged to
  
  
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
  
   The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
  
  
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
  
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
  
   If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure
 something
   plausible builds from them.
  
   The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
  
   [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
   [  ]  0 no opinion
   [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
  
   Rick
  
  
 
 
 
 
  --
  Vamsi




-- 
Vamsi


[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 953780

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953780 built with tests included
 
See the full build-1400.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100611/build-1400.log
 
 
See the unit test reports at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100611/unit-test-reports
 
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//org/springframework/spring-jms/2.5.6/spring-jms-2.5.6.jar
190K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repo.fusesource.com/maven2/commons-pool/commons-pool/1.5.4/commons-pool-1.5.4.jar
Downloading: 
http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external/commons-pool/commons-pool/1.5.4/commons-pool-1.5.4.jar
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//commons-pool/commons-pool/1.5.4/commons-pool-1.5.4.jar
93K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//org/springframework/spring-context-support/2.5.6/spring-context-support-2.5.6.jar
94K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-pool/5.4-SNAPSHOT/activemq-pool-5.4-SNAPSHOT.jar
35K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external/rome/rome/0.8/rome-0.8.jar
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//rome/rome/0.8/rome-0.8.jar
192K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external/org/springframework/spring-webmvc/3.0.1.RELEASE/spring-webmvc-3.0.1.RELEASE.jar
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//org/springframework/spring-webmvc/3.0.1.RELEASE/spring-webmvc-3.0.1.RELEASE.jar
388K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//stax/stax/1.2.0/stax-1.2.0.jar
175K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external/xmlpull/xmlpull/1.1.3.4d_b4_min/xmlpull-1.1.3.4d_b4_min.jar
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//xmlpull/xmlpull/1.1.3.4d_b4_min/xmlpull-1.1.3.4d_b4_min.jar
23K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-xmpp/5.4-SNAPSHOT/activemq-xmpp-5.4-SNAPSHOT.jar
173K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/2/org/codehaus/woodstox/woodstox-core-asl/4.0.7/woodstox-core-asl-4.0.7.jar
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1/org.codehaus.woodstox/jars/woodstox-core-asl-4.0.7.jar
Downloading: 
http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external/org/codehaus/woodstox/woodstox-core-asl/4.0.7/woodstox-core-asl-4.0.7.jar
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//org/codehaus/woodstox/woodstox-core-asl/4.0.7/woodstox-core-asl-4.0.7.jar
471K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/2/org/codehaus/woodstox/stax2-api/3.0.1/stax2-api-3.0.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://download.java.net/maven/1/org.codehaus.woodstox/jars/stax2-api-3.0.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external/org/codehaus/woodstox/stax2-api/3.0.1/stax2-api-3.0.1.jar
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//org/codehaus/woodstox/stax2-api/3.0.1/stax2-api-3.0.1.jar
175K downloaded
[WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Checksum failed on download: local = 
'12393455d7d25eab09bb9b2043b6df13406ec70d'; remote = 
'88985bfab2394cf8e56fcbd97cd44f7cac7bf8ca' - RETRYING
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//org/codehaus/woodstox/stax2-api/3.0.1/stax2-api-3.0.1.jar
175K downloaded
[WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Checksum failed on download: local = 
'12393455d7d25eab09bb9b2043b6df13406ec70d'; remote = 
'88985bfab2394cf8e56fcbd97cd44f7cac7bf8ca' - IGNORING
Downloading: 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-console/5.4-SNAPSHOT/activemq-console-5.4-SNAPSHOT.jar
109K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repo.fusesource.com/maven2/net/sf/josql/josql/1.5/josql-1.5.jar
193K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://repo.fusesource.com/maven2/net/sf/josql/gentlyweb-utils/1.5/gentlyweb-utils-1.5.jar
67K downloaded
Downloading: 
http://maven.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/nexus-proxy//opensymphony/sitemesh/2.2.1/sitemesh-2.2.1.jar
130K downloaded
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-webconsole-jetty/src/main/resources
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-webconsole-jetty/src/main/filtered-resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [car:validate-configuration]
[INFO] [car:prepare-plan]
[INFO] Generated: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-webconsole-jetty/target/work/plan.xml
[INFO] [car:verify-no-dependency-change]
[INFO] 
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] 
[INFO

svn problems

2010-06-11 Thread Rick McGuire
I'm seeing some serious problems accessing svn right now, and 
unfortunately, I think this might have messed some things up.  I was 
using the release plugin to create a branch from the 2.2 tag, and 
received the following error while attempting to create the branch 
version from the modified tag version:


svn: PROPFIND of 
'/repos/asf/!svn/bc/953750/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.2/pl
ugins/connector': SSL negotiation failed: SSL error: parse tlsext 
(https://svn.a

pache.org)
svn: Error reading spooled REPORT request response

This killed the mvn command, which means the tag version has been 
altered and not restored.  Things are stuck in an intermediate state.  
I've been attempting to revert the changes to the tag version, but every 
time I attempt the merge to back out the revision, I get the same error 
as above at different locations in the process.  Unfortunately, I need 
to leave here very shortly and will be away for the weekend.  If anybody 
has the knowledge and time to try to fix this, that would be great.  
Otherwise, I'll try to fix this on Monday.  The revision that needs 
reverting is r953750.


Rick




[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 953836

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953836 built with tests included
 
See the full build-1500.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611/build-1500.log
 
Download the binaries from 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO] 
[INFO] Total time: 38 minutes 36 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Jun 11 15:41:04 EDT 2010
[INFO] Final Memory: 479M/1015M
[INFO] 
 
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=
 
Assembly: tomcat
=
See full test results and logs at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611/logs-1500-tomcat/
 
Running TestSuite
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.661 sec  
FAILURE!
 
[INFO] No sources to compile
[INFO] [surefire:test {execution: default-test}]
[INFO] Tests are skipped.
[INFO] [war:war {execution: default-war}]
[INFO] Packaging webapp
[INFO] Assembling webapp[appname-war] in 
[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Processing war project
[INFO] Copying webapp 
webResources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/src/main/webapp]
 
to[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Copying webapp 
webResources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/classes]
 
to[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Copying webapp 
resources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/src/main/webapp]
[INFO] Building jar: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] Webapp assembled in[46 msecs]
[INFO] Building war: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
[INFO] [failsafe:integration-test {execution: integration-test}]
[INFO] Failsafe report directory: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/failsafe-reports

---
 T E S T S
---
There are no tests to run.

Results :

Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[WARNING] Skipping verification of legal files in artifacts:
[WARNING] org.apache.geronimo.testsuite:appname-war:war:3.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] [install:install {execution: default-install}]
[INFO] Installing 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
 to 
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/appname-war/3.0-SNAPSHOT/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
[INFO] [failsafe:verify {execution: verify}]
[INFO] Failsafe report directory: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/failsafe-reports
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Geronimo TestSuite :: Enterprise Testsuite :: AppName - Client
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO] 
[INFO] [genesis:validate-configuration {execution: default}]
[INFO] [geronimo-property:set-property {execution: set-property}]
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources {execution: default-resources}]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 2 resources
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/main/filtered-resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:compile {execution: default-compile}]
[INFO] Compiling 1 source file to 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/target/classes
[INFO] [resources:testResources {execution: default-testResources}]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/test/resources
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/test/filtered-resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:testCompile {execution

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5091) Bundlize the yoko jar files.

2010-06-11 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12878143#action_12878143
 ] 

David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5091:


I have been told that there's a good chance that if we don't let the framework 
export corba and rmi classes, we don't need to put ours in the endorsed 
directory.  We should try this and see if it works.

 Bundlize the yoko jar files. 
 -

 Key: GERONIMO-5091
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5091
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Sub-task
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: CORBA, osgi
Reporter: Rick McGuire



-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 953904

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953904 built with tests included
 
See the full build-2000.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100611/build-2000.log
 
Download the binaries from 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100611
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO] 
[INFO] Total time: 41 minutes 41 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Jun 11 20:44:29 EDT 2010
[INFO] Final Memory: 332M/972M
[INFO] 
 
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=
 
Assembly: tomcat
=
See full test results and logs at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100611/logs-2000-tomcat/
 
 
[INFO] [INFO] Building Geronimo TestSuite :: Commands Testsuite :: GShell
[INFO] [INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO] [INFO] 

[INFO] [INFO] [genesis:validate-configuration {execution: default}]
[INFO] [INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [INFO] Setting property: classpath.resource.loader.class = 
'org.codehaus.plexus.velocity.ContextClassLoaderResourceLoader'.
[INFO] [INFO] Setting property: velocimacro.messages.on = 'false'.
[INFO] [INFO] Setting property: resource.loader = 'classpath'.
[INFO] [INFO] Setting property: resource.manager.logwhenfound = 'false'.
[INFO] [INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/testsuite/commands-testsuite/gshell/src/main/resources
[INFO] [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/testsuite/commands-testsuite/gshell/src/main/filtered-resources
[INFO] [INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] [INFO] No sources to compile
[INFO] [INFO] [resources:testResources]
[INFO] [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/testsuite/commands-testsuite/gshell/src/test/filtered-resources
[INFO] [INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [INFO] [compiler:testCompile]
[INFO] [INFO] Compiling 1 source file to 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/testsuite/commands-testsuite/gshell/target/test-classes
[INFO] [INFO] [surefire:test]
[INFO] [INFO] Tests are skipped.
[INFO] [INFO] [jar:jar]
[INFO] [INFO] Building jar: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/testsuite/commands-testsuite/gshell/target/gshell-2.2.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] [INFO] [failsafe:integration-test {execution: integration-test}]
[INFO] [INFO] Failsafe report directory: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/testsuite/commands-testsuite/gshell/target/failsafe-reports
[INFO] 
[INFO] ---
[INFO]  T E S T S
[INFO] ---
[INFO] Running TestSuite
[INFO] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 19.515 
sec
[INFO] 
[INFO] Results :
[INFO] 
[INFO] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO] 
[INFO] [WARNING] File encoding has not been set, using platform encoding 
ANSI_X3.4-1968, i.e. build is platform dependent!
[INFO] [INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[INFO] [WARNING] Skipping verification of legal files in artifacts:
[INFO] [WARNING] org.apache.geronimo.testsuite:gshell:jar:2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] [INFO] [failsafe:verify {execution: verify}]
[INFO] [INFO] Failsafe report directory: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/testsuite/commands-testsuite/gshell/target/failsafe-reports
[INFO] [WARNING] File encoding has not been set, using platform encoding 
ANSI_X3.4-1968, i.e. build is platform dependent!
[INFO] [INFO] [install:install]
[INFO] [INFO] Installing 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/testsuite/commands-testsuite/gshell/target/gshell-2.2.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
 to 
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/gshell/2.2.1-SNAPSHOT/gshell-2.2.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] [INFO] 

[INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO] [INFO] 

[INFO] [INFO] Total time: 38 seconds
[INFO] [INFO] Finished at: Fri Jun 11 20:55:26 EDT 2010
[INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 37M/566M
[INFO] [INFO] 

[INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[INFO] [install:install]
[INFO] Installing 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/testsuite/commands-testsuite/pom.xml to 
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/commands-testsuite/2.2.1-SNAPSHOT/commands-testsuite-2.2.1-SNAPSHOT.pom
[INFO] [geronimo:stop-server {execution: stop}]
[INFO] Stopping Geronimo server

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5380) Optionally expose gbeans in the osgi serviice registry

2010-06-11 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
Optionally expose gbeans in the osgi serviice registry
--

 Key: GERONIMO-5380
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5380
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Security Level: public (Regular issues)
  Components: kernel, osgi
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: David Jencks
Assignee: David Jencks
 Fix For: 3.0


One step for better osgi integration would be to optionally expose gbeans as 
osgi services.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5376) OpenEJB failover failed

2010-06-11 Thread viola.lu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12878191#action_12878191
 ] 

viola.lu commented on GERONIMO-5376:


Paste a post on openejb dev mail list about openejb multipoint failover
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Multipoint-URI-td2239616.html#a2251237
from this thread, this problem and configuration become clear, my configuration 
seems no problem, anyway i will double check.

 OpenEJB failover failed 
 

 Key: GERONIMO-5376
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: OpenEJB
Affects Versions: 2.2.1
 Environment: windows 2003, suse10 sp2, redhat 5.3
 jdk: sun 1.6.10
Reporter: viola.lu
Assignee: Ivan
 Fix For: 2.2.1

 Attachments: loadbean.zip


 Server 1: window 2003, viola-dev
 Server 2: suse 10 sp2, suse10sp268
 Server 3: redhat 5.3, rhel53x86
 1. Add MultipointServers=suse10sp268:4212  to server 1
 2. Add MultipointServers=rhel53x86:4212 to server 2
 3. Add MultipointServers=rhel53x86:4212 to server 3
 4.Deploy loadbean interface to server 1. deploy loadbean implementation to 
 server 2, server 3
 Deploy a openejb client servlet to server 1 which call server 2. server 3
  
 p.setProperty(Context.PROVIDER_URL,failover:ejbd://suse10sp2:4201,ejbd://rhel53x86:4201);
 5.Shutdown server 2, it should failover to server 3, but failed, server  1 
 reported errors:
 Invalid response from server -1.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 953918

2010-06-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 953918 built with tests included
 
See the full build-2100.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611/build-2100.log
 
Download the binaries from 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO] 
[INFO] Total time: 36 minutes 59 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Jun 11 21:41:30 EDT 2010
[INFO] Final Memory: 596M/994M
[INFO] 
 
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=
 
Assembly: tomcat
=
See full test results and logs at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100611/logs-2100-tomcat/
 
Running TestSuite
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.74 sec  
FAILURE!
 
[INFO] [surefire:test {execution: default-test}]
[INFO] Tests are skipped.
[INFO] [war:war {execution: default-war}]
[INFO] Packaging webapp
[INFO] Assembling webapp[appname-war] in 
[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Processing war project
[INFO] Copying webapp 
webResources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/src/main/webapp]
 
to[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Copying webapp 
webResources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/classes]
 
to[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT]
[INFO] Copying webapp 
resources[/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/src/main/webapp]
[INFO] Building jar: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] Webapp assembled in[55 msecs]
[INFO] Building war: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
[INFO] [failsafe:integration-test {execution: integration-test}]
[INFO] Failsafe report directory: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/failsafe-reports

---
 T E S T S
---
There are no tests to run.

Results :

Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] [ianal:verify-legal-files {execution: default}]
[WARNING] Skipping verification of legal files in artifacts:
[WARNING] org.apache.geronimo.testsuite:appname-war:war:3.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] [install:install {execution: default-install}]
[INFO] Installing 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
 to 
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/appname-war/3.0-SNAPSHOT/appname-war-3.0-SNAPSHOT.war
[INFO] [failsafe:verify {execution: verify}]
[INFO] Failsafe report directory: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-war/target/failsafe-reports
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Geronimo TestSuite :: Enterprise Testsuite :: AppName - Client
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO] 
[INFO] [genesis:validate-configuration {execution: default}]
[INFO] [geronimo-property:set-property {execution: set-property}]
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources {execution: default-resources}]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 2 resources
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/main/filtered-resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:compile {execution: default-compile}]
[INFO] Compiling 1 source file to 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/target/classes
[INFO] [resources:testResources {execution: default-testResources}]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/test/resources
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/appname-tests/appname-client/src/test/filtered-resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:testCompile {execution: default-testCompile}]
[INFO

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5376) OpenEJB failover failed

2010-06-11 Thread Ivan (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12878192#action_12878192
 ] 

Ivan commented on GERONIMO-5376:


a. If you program the url like 
p.setProperty(Context.PROVIDER_URL,failover:ejbd://suse10sp2:4201,ejbd://rhel53x86:4201);.
 which means that the client has already knows some options, in this scenario, 
it is expected that some other cluster servers should be updated from server, 
it might not be clear that where the client get the server list.
b. If you configure MutlpointServers in the server 1, but the ejb application 
is not deployed to that server, there will be issues while all the server 2 and 
server 3 are down.
c. Configure the server itself in the MultipointServers make no sense, like 
what you do in server 3.


 OpenEJB failover failed 
 

 Key: GERONIMO-5376
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: OpenEJB
Affects Versions: 2.2.1
 Environment: windows 2003, suse10 sp2, redhat 5.3
 jdk: sun 1.6.10
Reporter: viola.lu
Assignee: Ivan
 Fix For: 2.2.1

 Attachments: loadbean.zip


 Server 1: window 2003, viola-dev
 Server 2: suse 10 sp2, suse10sp268
 Server 3: redhat 5.3, rhel53x86
 1. Add MultipointServers=suse10sp268:4212  to server 1
 2. Add MultipointServers=rhel53x86:4212 to server 2
 3. Add MultipointServers=rhel53x86:4212 to server 3
 4.Deploy loadbean interface to server 1. deploy loadbean implementation to 
 server 2, server 3
 Deploy a openejb client servlet to server 1 which call server 2. server 3
  
 p.setProperty(Context.PROVIDER_URL,failover:ejbd://suse10sp2:4201,ejbd://rhel53x86:4201);
 5.Shutdown server 2, it should failover to server 3, but failed, server  1 
 reported errors:
 Invalid response from server -1.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5376) OpenEJB failover failed

2010-06-11 Thread viola.lu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12878194#action_12878194
 ] 

viola.lu commented on GERONIMO-5376:


Some adjustification of description here:
I deployed ejb to server 1, server 2, server 3, and add server 2 as server 1 
mulitpoint server via initialmulitpointerserver attribute in 
var/config/config-substition.propteries, server 3 as server 2 mutlipoint 
servers, server 3 as server 1 multipoint server
EJB client application is in another server 4, totally sperated from server 1, 
2, 3.

So the three problems figured out here don't exist any more.


 OpenEJB failover failed 
 

 Key: GERONIMO-5376
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: OpenEJB
Affects Versions: 2.2.1
 Environment: windows 2003, suse10 sp2, redhat 5.3
 jdk: sun 1.6.10
Reporter: viola.lu
Assignee: Ivan
 Fix For: 2.2.1

 Attachments: loadbean.zip


 Server 1: window 2003, viola-dev
 Server 2: suse 10 sp2, suse10sp268
 Server 3: redhat 5.3, rhel53x86
 1. Add MultipointServers=suse10sp268:4212  to server 1
 2. Add MultipointServers=rhel53x86:4212 to server 2
 3. Add MultipointServers=rhel53x86:4212 to server 3
 4.Deploy loadbean interface to server 1. deploy loadbean implementation to 
 server 2, server 3
 Deploy a openejb client servlet to server 1 which call server 2. server 3
  
 p.setProperty(Context.PROVIDER_URL,failover:ejbd://suse10sp2:4201,ejbd://rhel53x86:4201);
 5.Shutdown server 2, it should failover to server 3, but failed, server  1 
 reported errors:
 Invalid response from server -1.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5376) OpenEJB failover failed

2010-06-11 Thread viola.lu (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

viola.lu updated GERONIMO-5376:
---

Description: 
Server 1: window 2003, viola-dev
Server 2: suse 10 sp2, suse10sp268
Server 3: redhat 5.3, rhel53x86
Server 4: windows xp
1. Add MultipointServers=suse10sp268:4212  to server 1
2. Add MultipointServers=rhel53x86:4212 to server 2
3. Add MultipointServers=viola-dev to server 3
4.Deploy loadbean ejb to server 1, server 2, server 3
Deploy a openejb client servlet loadbeanwar to server 4 which call server 1. 
 p.setProperty(Context.PROVIDER_URL,failover:ejbd://suse10sp2:4201);
5.Shutdown server 2, it should failover to server 3, but failed, server  1 
reported errors:
Invalid response from server -1.

  was:
Server 1: window 2003, viola-dev
Server 2: suse 10 sp2, suse10sp268
Server 3: redhat 5.3, rhel53x86
1. Add MultipointServers=suse10sp268:4212  to server 1
2. Add MultipointServers=rhel53x86:4212 to server 2
3. Add MultipointServers=rhel53x86:4212 to server 3
4.Deploy loadbean interface to server 1. deploy loadbean implementation to 
server 2, server 3
Deploy a openejb client servlet to server 1 which call server 2. server 3
 
p.setProperty(Context.PROVIDER_URL,failover:ejbd://suse10sp2:4201,ejbd://rhel53x86:4201);
5.Shutdown server 2, it should failover to server 3, but failed, server  1 
reported errors:
Invalid response from server -1.


 OpenEJB failover failed 
 

 Key: GERONIMO-5376
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5376
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: OpenEJB
Affects Versions: 2.2.1
 Environment: windows 2003, suse10 sp2, redhat 5.3
 jdk: sun 1.6.10
Reporter: viola.lu
Assignee: Ivan
 Fix For: 2.2.1

 Attachments: loadbean.zip


 Server 1: window 2003, viola-dev
 Server 2: suse 10 sp2, suse10sp268
 Server 3: redhat 5.3, rhel53x86
 Server 4: windows xp
 1. Add MultipointServers=suse10sp268:4212  to server 1
 2. Add MultipointServers=rhel53x86:4212 to server 2
 3. Add MultipointServers=viola-dev to server 3
 4.Deploy loadbean ejb to server 1, server 2, server 3
 Deploy a openejb client servlet loadbeanwar to server 4 which call server 1. 
  p.setProperty(Context.PROVIDER_URL,failover:ejbd://suse10sp2:4201);
 5.Shutdown server 2, it should failover to server 3, but failed, server  1 
 reported errors:
 Invalid response from server -1.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5381) Monitoring can not open graphs

2010-06-11 Thread Ben Liang (JIRA)
Monitoring can not open graphs
--

 Key: GERONIMO-5381
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5381
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public (Regular issues)
  Components: console
Affects Versions: 2.2.1
 Environment: xp sp2
jdk 1.6
Reporter: Ben Liang
Priority: Critical
 Fix For: 2.2.1, 3.0


When you open monitoring portlet and click the any name in Graphs table, there 
is a javascript error which makes the graphs label can not open .

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5381) Monitoring can not open graphs

2010-06-11 Thread Ben Liang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12878197#action_12878197
 ] 

Ben Liang commented on GERONIMO-5381:
-

Hi all,

This problem not always occurs, sometimes if I double click the name then I got 
a dojo error:

could not load 'dojox.charting.Chart2D'; last tried 
'../dojox/charting.Chart2D.js'   


Ben

 Monitoring can not open graphs
 --

 Key: GERONIMO-5381
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5381
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: console
Affects Versions: 2.2.1
 Environment: xp sp2
 jdk 1.6
Reporter: Ben Liang
Priority: Critical
 Fix For: 2.2.1, 3.0


 When you open monitoring portlet and click the any name in Graphs table, 
 there is a javascript error which makes the graphs label can not open .

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5380) Optionally expose gbeans in the osgi serviice registry

2010-06-11 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12878205#action_12878205
 ] 

David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5380:


Conversely we can provide some base support for exposing osgi services as 
gbeans.

 Optionally expose gbeans in the osgi serviice registry
 --

 Key: GERONIMO-5380
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5380
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: kernel, osgi
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: David Jencks
Assignee: David Jencks
 Fix For: 3.0


 One step for better osgi integration would be to optionally expose gbeans as 
 osgi services.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.