Re: Java EE 7 API jars

2013-04-17 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Hi Kevan,

Maybe I could help on EJB 3.2 part.

Jean-Louis


2013/4/17 Kevan Miller 

>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Kevin Sutter  wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Is there any activity in the Geronimo community to create and house the
> API jar files for Java EE 7 technologies, just like we've had available in
> the past with previous spec levels?  Is this work has already been started,
> could you point me at the JIRA or wiki or whatever is tracking this piece
> of work?  If the work hasn't been started, how should we kickstart this
> activity?
> >
> > The Java EE 7 family of specifications is very near to being finalized.
>  It would be great to have these API jar files available for those projects
> that will be implementing the specifications.  And, I think the Geronimo
> project is a great holding place.  Not that the Geronimo team has to do all
> the work, but it would be good to have a central project.
>
> Hi Kevin,
> Yes, there has been some work/discussion. Mark Struberg mentioned that he
> was going to start work on commons-annotation-1.2.
>
> I haven't seen any concerted effort to start building all Java 7 specs.
> Nor any effort to track Java 7 spec creation. A Jira with sub-tasks is
> probably a good way to start. Perhaps you want to give it a try? (Since it
> seems you may have an itch… ;-)
>
> --kevan
>
>


-- 
Jean-Louis


Re: Java EE 7 API jars

2013-04-17 Thread Kevan Miller

On Apr 17, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Kevin Sutter  wrote:

> Hi,
> Is there any activity in the Geronimo community to create and house the API 
> jar files for Java EE 7 technologies, just like we've had available in the 
> past with previous spec levels?  Is this work has already been started, could 
> you point me at the JIRA or wiki or whatever is tracking this piece of work?  
> If the work hasn't been started, how should we kickstart this activity?
> 
> The Java EE 7 family of specifications is very near to being finalized.  It 
> would be great to have these API jar files available for those projects that 
> will be implementing the specifications.  And, I think the Geronimo project 
> is a great holding place.  Not that the Geronimo team has to do all the work, 
> but it would be good to have a central project.

Hi Kevin,
Yes, there has been some work/discussion. Mark Struberg mentioned that he was 
going to start work on commons-annotation-1.2. 

I haven't seen any concerted effort to start building all Java 7 specs. Nor any 
effort to track Java 7 spec creation. A Jira with sub-tasks is probably a good 
way to start. Perhaps you want to give it a try? (Since it seems you may have 
an itch… ;-)

--kevan



Java EE 7 API jars

2013-04-17 Thread Kevin Sutter
Hi,
Is there any activity in the Geronimo community to create and house the API
jar files for Java EE 7 technologies, just like we've had available in the
past with previous spec levels?  Is this work has already been started,
could you point me at the JIRA or wiki or whatever is tracking this piece
of work?  If the work hasn't been started, how should we kickstart this
activity?

The Java EE 7 family of specifications is very near to being finalized.  It
would be great to have these API jar files available for those projects
that will be implementing the specifications.  And, I think the Geronimo
project is a great holding place.  Not that the Geronimo team has to do all
the work, but it would be good to have a central project.

Thanks,
Kevin Sutter
Apache OpenJPA PMC


[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6446) Build with Java 7

2013-04-17 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13633993#comment-13633993
 ] 

Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6446:


Working for me

> Build with Java 7
> -
>
> Key: GERONIMO-6446
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6446
> Project: Geronimo
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>  Components: buildsystem
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Jarek Gawor
>Assignee: Jarek Gawor
>
> Ensure that 3.0 branch builds with Java 7.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


xbean finder getURLs()

2013-04-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi,

in org.apache.xbean.finder.UrlSet#getUrls we rely on META-INF (or "") to
find jars. There are cases where it doesn't work at all (a common case
where i saw it is when you only have META-INF/MANIFEST.MF which is consider
for a single entry and not META-INF then MANIFEST.MF - depends the build
tool/zip format if i understood correctly)

the question are:
1) do we getresources("META-INF/MANIFEST.MF") too
2) why not simply querying the classloader which is very very often an
URLClassLoader -> if (yes) return Arrays.asList(classLoader.getURLs());
else currentImpl;

The 2 seems less correct but in practise i think it is more efficient - we
can do both too (testing URLClassLoader and if not adding MANIFEST.MF
listing)

wdyt?

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau *
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*