Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-04-06 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Thanks, just making sure my report is correct. :)


Regards,
Alan

> On Apr 6, 2015, at 12:34 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  wrote:
> 
> Yes they have been
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Tomitriber 
> 
> 2015-04-06 21:21 GMT+02:00 Alan D. Cabrera  >:
> We need to follow up w/ a [RESULT].  Did the artifacts get pushed out?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alan
> 
> 
>> On Apr 6, 2015, at 8:12 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > wrote:
>> 
>> Think i did then
>> 
>> Le 6 avr. 2015 16:49, "Mark Struberg" > > a écrit :
>> Remain sent the tally but forgot to change the subject to [RESULT].
>> 
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
>> > Am 05.04.2015 um 16:46 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera > > >:
>> >
>> > I was scanning the mailing lists and I don’t think that saw the result.  I 
>> > double checked and found it.  :)
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Alan
>> >
>> >> On Apr 5, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Done AFAIK
>> >>
>> >> Le 4 avr. 2015 21:41, "Alan D. Cabrera" > >> > a écrit :
>> >> Time to wrap up this vote?  :)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Alan
>> >>
>> >> > On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera > >> > > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag.  
>> >> > Can you at least tell us the svn revision?
>> >> >
>> >> > +1 - binding
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
>> >> >> mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hello guys,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
>> >> >> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here is the staging repo:
>> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
>> >> >>  
>> >> >> 
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> My key can be found as last time at
>> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >>
>> >> >> please VOTE
>> >> >> [+1] all fine, ship it
>> >> >> [+0] don't care
>> >> >> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
>> >> >>
>> >> >> here is my +1
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com 
>> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com 
>> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau 
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> 
> 
> 



Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-04-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Yes they have been


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber


2015-04-06 21:21 GMT+02:00 Alan D. Cabrera :

> We need to follow up w/ a [RESULT].  Did the artifacts get pushed out?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Apr 6, 2015, at 8:12 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> wrote:
>
> Think i did then
> Le 6 avr. 2015 16:49, "Mark Struberg"  a écrit :
>
>> Remain sent the tally but forgot to change the subject to [RESULT].
>>
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>> > Am 05.04.2015 um 16:46 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera :
>> >
>> > I was scanning the mailing lists and I don’t think that saw the
>> result.  I double checked and found it.  :)
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Alan
>> >
>> >> On Apr 5, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Done AFAIK
>> >>
>> >> Le 4 avr. 2015 21:41, "Alan D. Cabrera"  a
>> écrit :
>> >> Time to wrap up this vote?  :)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Alan
>> >>
>> >> > On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera 
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a
>> tag.  Can you at least tell us the svn revision?
>> >> >
>> >> > +1 - binding
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hello guys,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
>> >> >> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here is the staging repo:
>> >> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> My key can be found as last time at
>> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
>> >> >>
>> >> >> please VOTE
>> >> >> [+1] all fine, ship it
>> >> >> [+0] don't care
>> >> >> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
>> >> >>
>> >> >> here is my +1
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>


Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-04-06 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
We need to follow up w/ a [RESULT].  Did the artifacts get pushed out?


Regards,
Alan


> On Apr 6, 2015, at 8:12 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau  wrote:
> 
> Think i did then
> 
> Le 6 avr. 2015 16:49, "Mark Struberg"  > a écrit :
> Remain sent the tally but forgot to change the subject to [RESULT].
> 
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> > Am 05.04.2015 um 16:46 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera  > >:
> >
> > I was scanning the mailing lists and I don’t think that saw the result.  I 
> > double checked and found it.  :)
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> >> On Apr 5, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau  >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Done AFAIK
> >>
> >> Le 4 avr. 2015 21:41, "Alan D. Cabrera"  >> > a écrit :
> >> Time to wrap up this vote?  :)
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alan
> >>
> >> > On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera  >> > > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag.  
> >> > Can you at least tell us the svn revision?
> >> >
> >> > +1 - binding
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  >> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hello guys,
> >> >>
> >> >> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
> >> >> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
> >> >>
> >> >> Here is the staging repo:
> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
> >> >>  
> >> >> 
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> My key can be found as last time at
> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS 
> >> >> 
> >> >>
> >> >> please VOTE
> >> >> [+1] all fine, ship it
> >> >> [+0] don't care
> >> >> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
> >> >>
> >> >> here is my +1
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> @rmannibucau
> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com 
> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com 
> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau 
> >> >
> >>
> >
> 



Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-04-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Think i did then
Le 6 avr. 2015 16:49, "Mark Struberg"  a écrit :

> Remain sent the tally but forgot to change the subject to [RESULT].
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 05.04.2015 um 16:46 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera :
> >
> > I was scanning the mailing lists and I don’t think that saw the result.
> I double checked and found it.  :)
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> >> On Apr 5, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Done AFAIK
> >>
> >> Le 4 avr. 2015 21:41, "Alan D. Cabrera"  a écrit
> :
> >> Time to wrap up this vote?  :)
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alan
> >>
> >> > On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera 
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag.
> Can you at least tell us the svn revision?
> >> >
> >> > +1 - binding
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hello guys,
> >> >>
> >> >> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
> >> >> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
> >> >>
> >> >> Here is the staging repo:
> >> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> My key can be found as last time at
> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
> >> >>
> >> >> please VOTE
> >> >> [+1] all fine, ship it
> >> >> [+0] don't care
> >> >> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
> >> >>
> >> >> here is my +1
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> >> @rmannibucau
> >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
>


Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-04-06 Thread Mark Struberg
Remain sent the tally but forgot to change the subject to [RESULT].


LieGrue,
strub


> Am 05.04.2015 um 16:46 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera :
> 
> I was scanning the mailing lists and I don’t think that saw the result.  I 
> double checked and found it.  :)
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alan
> 
>> On Apr 5, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Done AFAIK
>> 
>> Le 4 avr. 2015 21:41, "Alan D. Cabrera"  a écrit :
>> Time to wrap up this vote?  :)
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>> 
>> > On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera  wrote:
>> >
>> > I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag.  Can 
>> > you at least tell us the svn revision?
>> >
>> > +1 - binding
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello guys,
>> >>
>> >> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
>> >> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
>> >>
>> >> Here is the staging repo:
>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> My key can be found as last time at
>> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
>> >>
>> >> please VOTE
>> >> [+1] all fine, ship it
>> >> [+0] don't care
>> >> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
>> >>
>> >> here is my +1
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >
>> 
> 



Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-04-05 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
I was scanning the mailing lists and I don’t think that saw the result.  I 
double checked and found it.  :)


Regards,
Alan

> On Apr 5, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau  wrote:
> 
> Done AFAIK
> 
> Le 4 avr. 2015 21:41, "Alan D. Cabrera"  > a écrit :
> Time to wrap up this vote?  :)
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alan
> 
> > On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera  > > wrote:
> >
> > I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag.  Can 
> > you at least tell us the svn revision?
> >
> > +1 - binding
> >
> >
> >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello guys,
> >>
> >> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
> >> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
> >>
> >> Here is the staging repo:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/ 
> >> 
> >>
> >>
> >> My key can be found as last time at
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS 
> >> 
> >>
> >> please VOTE
> >> [+1] all fine, ship it
> >> [+0] don't care
> >> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
> >>
> >> here is my +1
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com 
> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com 
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau 
> >
> 



Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-04-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Done AFAIK
Le 4 avr. 2015 21:41, "Alan D. Cabrera"  a écrit :

> Time to wrap up this vote?  :)
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> > On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera 
> wrote:
> >
> > I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag.
> Can you at least tell us the svn revision?
> >
> > +1 - binding
> >
> >
> >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello guys,
> >>
> >> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
> >> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
> >>
> >> Here is the staging repo:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
> >>
> >>
> >> My key can be found as last time at
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
> >>
> >> please VOTE
> >> [+1] all fine, ship it
> >> [+0] don't care
> >> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
> >>
> >> here is my +1
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
>
>


Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-04-04 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Time to wrap up this vote?  :)


Regards,
Alan

> On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera  wrote:
> 
> I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag.  Can you 
> at least tell us the svn revision?
> 
> +1 - binding
> 
> 
>> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello guys,
>> 
>> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
>> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
>> 
>> Here is the staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
>> 
>> 
>> My key can be found as last time at
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
>> 
>> please VOTE
>> [+1] all fine, ship it
>> [+0] don't care
>> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
>> 
>> here is my +1
>> 
>> 
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> 



Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-02-19 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi

with 3 bindings and 2 non binding votes this vote passes. I'll publish
binaries after this mail.

Thank you all guys


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2015-02-19 23:04 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg :
> +1 binding
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>> Am 18.02.2015 um 23:04 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
>>
>> up?
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2015-02-13 19:27 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>>> Hi Alan,
>>>
>>> tag is here 
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_2.0_spec-1.0-alpha-2/
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-02-13 19:25 GMT+01:00 Alan D. Cabrera :
 I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag.  Can 
 you at least tell us the svn revision?

 +1 - binding


> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  
> wrote:
>
> Hello guys,
>
> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
>
> Here is the staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
>
>
> My key can be found as last time at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
>
> please VOTE
> [+1] all fine, ship it
> [+0] don't care
> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
>
> here is my +1
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau

>


Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-02-19 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 binding

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 18.02.2015 um 23:04 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 
> up?
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> 
> 
> 2015-02-13 19:27 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>> Hi Alan,
>> 
>> tag is here 
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_2.0_spec-1.0-alpha-2/
>> 
>> 
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> 
>> 
>> 2015-02-13 19:25 GMT+01:00 Alan D. Cabrera :
>>> I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag.  Can 
>>> you at least tell us the svn revision?
>>> 
>>> +1 - binding
>>> 
>>> 
 On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  
 wrote:
 
 Hello guys,
 
 As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
 geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
 
 Here is the staging repo:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
 
 
 My key can be found as last time at
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
 
 please VOTE
 [+1] all fine, ship it
 [+0] don't care
 [-1] stop, because ${reason}
 
 here is my +1
 
 
 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
 https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> 



Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-02-18 Thread John D. Ament
+1 (non binding)

On Thu Feb 12 2015 at 3:45:17 PM Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> Hello guys,
>
> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
>
> Here is the staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
>
>
> My key can be found as last time at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
>
> please VOTE
> [+1] all fine, ship it
> [+0] don't care
> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
>
> here is my +1
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>


Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
up?


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2015-02-13 19:27 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> Hi Alan,
>
> tag is here 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_2.0_spec-1.0-alpha-2/
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2015-02-13 19:25 GMT+01:00 Alan D. Cabrera :
>> I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag.  Can 
>> you at least tell us the svn revision?
>>
>> +1 - binding
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello guys,
>>>
>>> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
>>> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
>>>
>>> Here is the staging repo:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
>>>
>>>
>>> My key can be found as last time at
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
>>>
>>> please VOTE
>>> [+1] all fine, ship it
>>> [+0] don't care
>>> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
>>>
>>> here is my +1
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>


Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-02-13 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Alan,

tag is here 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_2.0_spec-1.0-alpha-2/


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2015-02-13 19:25 GMT+01:00 Alan D. Cabrera :
> I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag.  Can you 
> at least tell us the svn revision?
>
> +1 - binding
>
>
>> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
>> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
>>
>> Here is the staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
>>
>>
>> My key can be found as last time at
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
>>
>> please VOTE
>> [+1] all fine, ship it
>> [+0] don't care
>> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
>>
>> here is my +1
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>


Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-02-13 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
I imagine since this is an alpha release we won’t be creating a tag.  Can you 
at least tell us the svn revision?

+1 - binding


> On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau  
> wrote:
> 
> Hello guys,
> 
> As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
> geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
> 
> Here is the staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
> 
> 
> My key can be found as last time at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
> 
> please VOTE
> [+1] all fine, ship it
> [+0] don't care
> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
> 
> here is my +1
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau



Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-02-13 Thread Martyn Taylor

+1 (non-binding)

Thanks for the quick turn around Romain.

On 12/02/15 20:43, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:

Hello guys,

As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.

Here is the staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/


My key can be found as last time at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS

please VOTE
[+1] all fine, ship it
[+0] don't care
[-1] stop, because ${reason}

here is my +1


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau




[VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-02-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hello guys,

As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.

Here is the staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/


My key can be found as last time at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS

please VOTE
[+1] all fine, ship it
[+0] don't care
[-1] stop, because ${reason}

here is my +1


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau