Board report time 2015-12

[Alan Cabrera]

Here's the report that I sent to the board:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-12+-+December
 


If I missed something please let me know.  Thanks!


Regards,
Alan

Re: Board report time 2015-11

[Eduardo Garcia]

Some time ago, I was trying to download the source code of Geronimo, in 
order to start playing with it and see if something can be done on it.  
Unfortunatelly, there is no enough updated documentation at website 
about how to do that.


I tried with svn, and using "mvn install" it keeps showing errors due 
some repositories not found.  If you have any updated doc to do this, I 
will appreciate having it.  I would like to work in creating a good 
documentation about how to download it step by step and compiling code 
smoothly.  This is the begining to bring more devs to the project.


I'm using Geronimo with OSGi in some projects with Aries and OpenJPA.  
Using also MyFaces and Trinidad (or PrimeFaces).  I like how easy you 
can develop OSGi applications with Geronimo, and if there is a chance to 
colaborate in any way, I would like to do it.


Regards,


Eduardo García


On 11/18/2015 08:33 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:

Here's the report that I sent to the board:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-18+-+November

If I missed something please let me know directly.  I’m sorry about 
being so tardy with the report.



Regards,
Alan

Board report time 2015-11

[Alan D. Cabrera]

Here's the report that I sent to the board:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-18+-+November
 


If I missed something please let me know directly.  I’m sorry about being so 
tardy with the report.


Regards,
Alan

Re: Board report time 2015-07

[Mark Struberg]

looks fine.

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 09.07.2015 um 07:11 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera :
> 
> Here's the report that I sent to the board:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-07+-+July
> 
> If I missed something please let me know directly.  I’m sorry about being so 
> tardy with the report.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alan 
> 

Board report time 2015-07

[Alan D. Cabrera]

Here's the report that I sent to the board:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-07+-+July
 


If I missed something please let me know directly.  I’m sorry about being so 
tardy with the report.


Regards,
Alan 

Re: Board report time 2015-04

[Russell E. Glaue]

Looking at this from an angle of enterprise management, I always liked the 
following features about Geronimo:

1) I can load any service as a gbean on top of Geronimo, and run it. This 
includes: Tomcat, Jetty, or even Apache JAMES. In fact, I could run Apache 
JAMES by itself inside Geronimo without Tomcat or Jetty. When the first example 
JAMES gbean was discussed, I was happy to see it. I wished it had gone 
somewhere.
I think this feature points at the OSGi - being able to load and manage 
services on top of the kernel.

2) With Geronimo, I don't have to run tomcat on top of the tanuki wrapper 
(http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/). Tomcat is shipped without any kind of 
watchdog. Running it in the enterprise requires some kind of active monitoring 
to make sure it keeps running. Geronimo meets this need.

3) Geronimo was working towards being friendly in Web Server Farm management. 
It was having a model that allowed configuration to be pushed out from a 
central maven-like repository.

4) Geronimo works with a maven-like repository. For building, installing, 
distributing, and maintaining components and applications in Geronimo, its 
adherence to a maven model makes that really structured and more understandable 
as we integrate other things into Geronimo.

5) Geronimo instances. At one time Geronimo allowed multiple instances, then 
later in version 3 it did not, then I contributed to get multiple instance 
working again, then the project team started discussing changes that would not 
allow that again.
Okay, with today's docker/component standard, perhaps multiple instance support 
is not as necessary. However, I still think it is a good feature to have. One 
should be able to install Geronimo one time, after which they should be able to 
create and destroy multiple instances at will without a lot of heavy lifting.
In the enterprise, we want to run different services in their own JVM, but we 
do not necessarily want to have to install and configure the entire Geronimo 
package every time. We want to install Geronimo only once on a server - 
especially when we are talking about web farm management, we want one admin 
node on one server to proxy-manage all local instances.

-RG


- Original Message -
From: "Mark Struberg" 
To: "geronimo-dev" 
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 2:25:54 AM
Subject: Re: Board report time 2015-04

It’s not only the spec-api stuff.
There are also many other things like xbean, geronimo-jta, javamail, etc. It’s 
basically a commons-EE atm.

If you talk about a reboot then I wonder what you had in mind. There is TomEE 
which takes the really lightweight approach. And having two implementations 
providing the same doesn’t make sense. At least not if there are exactly the 
same people involved…
Should the Geronimo-Server focus on OSGi? That is what made the big difference 
so far. No clue otherwise.

LieGrue,
strub




> Am 07.04.2015 um 08:10 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera :
>
> I agree, we should start moving our focus.
>
> When you speak of #2, what bits do you speak of?  The glue that assembles the 
> various JSR implementations of the JEE spec?
>
> I wonder if we should start a total re-write.  We’ve learned a thing or two 
> since this project started and the current Zeitgeist for server software has 
> moved on.
>
> I think it’s an exciting time to take a fresh look at Geronimo and to 
> “re-imagine” it.  If you all agree, what to keep and what to re-write?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>> On Apr 6, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Mark Struberg  wrote:
>>
>> Txs Alan!
>>
>>
>> I think we should probably move our focus finally? The Geronimo project 
>> basically consists of 2 different things.
>> 1.) the Geronimo EE server
>> 2.) all the rest ;)
>>
>> 2 is doing really fine. 1 is worrying. Or are there any significant people 
>> interested in continueing with 1?
>>
>> Should we reflect this in the report?
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 04.04.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera :
>>>
>>> Here's my initial draft:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April
>>>
>>> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page 
>>> directly.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>>
>>
>

Re: Board report time 2015-04

[Mark Struberg]

It’s not only the spec-api stuff.
There are also many other things like xbean, geronimo-jta, javamail, etc. It’s 
basically a commons-EE atm.

If you talk about a reboot then I wonder what you had in mind. There is TomEE 
which takes the really lightweight approach. And having two implementations 
providing the same doesn’t make sense. At least not if there are exactly the 
same people involved…
Should the Geronimo-Server focus on OSGi? That is what made the big difference 
so far. No clue otherwise.

LieGrue,
strub




> Am 07.04.2015 um 08:10 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera :
> 
> I agree, we should start moving our focus.
> 
> When you speak of #2, what bits do you speak of?  The glue that assembles the 
> various JSR implementations of the JEE spec?
> 
> I wonder if we should start a total re-write.  We’ve learned a thing or two 
> since this project started and the current Zeitgeist for server software has 
> moved on.
> 
> I think it’s an exciting time to take a fresh look at Geronimo and to 
> “re-imagine” it.  If you all agree, what to keep and what to re-write? 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alan
> 
>> On Apr 6, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Mark Struberg  wrote:
>> 
>> Txs Alan!
>> 
>> 
>> I think we should probably move our focus finally? The Geronimo project 
>> basically consists of 2 different things.
>> 1.) the Geronimo EE server
>> 2.) all the rest ;)
>> 
>> 2 is doing really fine. 1 is worrying. Or are there any significant people 
>> interested in continueing with 1?
>> 
>> Should we reflect this in the report?
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 04.04.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera :
>>> 
>>> Here's my initial draft:
>>> 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April
>>> 
>>> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page 
>>> directly.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>> 
>> 
> 

Re: Board report time 2015-04

[Alan D. Cabrera]

I agree, we should start moving our focus.

When you speak of #2, what bits do you speak of?  The glue that assembles the 
various JSR implementations of the JEE spec?

I wonder if we should start a total re-write.  We’ve learned a thing or two 
since this project started and the current Zeitgeist for server software has 
moved on.

I think it’s an exciting time to take a fresh look at Geronimo and to 
“re-imagine” it.  If you all agree, what to keep and what to re-write? 


Regards,
Alan

> On Apr 6, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Mark Struberg  wrote:
> 
> Txs Alan!
> 
> 
> I think we should probably move our focus finally? The Geronimo project 
> basically consists of 2 different things.
> 1.) the Geronimo EE server
> 2.) all the rest ;)
> 
> 2 is doing really fine. 1 is worrying. Or are there any significant people 
> interested in continueing with 1?
> 
> Should we reflect this in the report?
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 04.04.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera :
>> 
>> Here's my initial draft:
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April
>> 
>> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page 
>> directly.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>> 
> 

Re: Board report time 2015-04

[Jack Cai]

Hi,

  For 1, it will be nice to be able to build geronimo server with more
packaging/assembly options. For example, it will be very useful to be able
to have an assembly that supports tomcat war without ejb, rar, ear. Also,
it will be very useful as well to be able to customize assembly options at
the framework level to fine services to be bundled in.

Regards

Jack

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Mark Struberg  wrote:

> Txs Alan!
>
>
> I think we should probably move our focus finally? The Geronimo project
> basically consists of 2 different things.
> 1.) the Geronimo EE server
> 2.) all the rest ;)
>
> 2 is doing really fine. 1 is worrying. Or are there any significant people
> interested in continueing with 1?
>
> Should we reflect this in the report?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 04.04.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera :
> >
> > Here's my initial draft:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April
> >
> > If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page
> directly.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
>
>

Re: Board report time 2015-04

[Mark Struberg]

Txs Alan!


I think we should probably move our focus finally? The Geronimo project 
basically consists of 2 different things.
1.) the Geronimo EE server
2.) all the rest ;)

2 is doing really fine. 1 is worrying. Or are there any significant people 
interested in continueing with 1?

Should we reflect this in the report?

LieGrue,
strub



> Am 04.04.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera :
> 
> Here's my initial draft:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April
> 
> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page 
> directly.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alan
> 

Board report time 2015-04

[Alan D. Cabrera]

Here's my initial draft:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April
 


If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page 
directly.


Regards,
Alan

Re: Board report time

[Jarek Gawor]

Yep. I updated the board report & submitted it.

Thanks!

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
 wrote:
> Hello Jarek,
>
> we can say we released some spec jars + javamail as well
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2015-02-16 6:34 GMT+01:00 Jarek Gawor :
>> I'll submit this tomorrow. Any last minute updates?
>>
>> Jarek
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Since I forgot to create a board report for January we have to provide
>>> one for February. Here's my initial draft:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-02+-+February
>>>
>>> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
>>> page directly.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jarek

Re: Board report time

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hello Jarek,

we can say we released some spec jars + javamail as well


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2015-02-16 6:34 GMT+01:00 Jarek Gawor :
> I'll submit this tomorrow. Any last minute updates?
>
> Jarek
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since I forgot to create a board report for January we have to provide
>> one for February. Here's my initial draft:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-02+-+February
>>
>> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
>> page directly.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jarek

Re: Board report time

[Jarek Gawor]

I'll submit this tomorrow. Any last minute updates?

Jarek

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since I forgot to create a board report for January we have to provide
> one for February. Here's my initial draft:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-02+-+February
>
> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
> page directly.
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek

Board report time

[Jarek Gawor]

Hi all,

Since I forgot to create a board report for January we have to provide
one for February. Here's my initial draft:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-02+-+February

If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
page directly.

Thanks,
Jarek

Re: Board report time

[Kevan Miller]

Looks good. Thanks Jarek.

--kevan

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a bit late but I created a draft board report for October:
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-10+-+October
>
> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
> page directly.
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek
>

Re: Board report time

[Alan D. Cabrera]

LGTM, thanks!


Regards,
Alan

On Oct 11, 2014, at 5:23 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This is a bit late but I created a draft board report for October:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-10+-+October
> 
> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
> page directly.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jarek

Board report time

[Jarek Gawor]

Hi all,

This is a bit late but I created a draft board report for October:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-10+-+October

If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
page directly.

Thanks,
Jarek

Re: Board report time

[Mark Struberg]

+1 for the report. looks good.


> Are we loosing steam as a community?

Well, geronimo contains quite a few interesting pieces. It's kind of an 
'EE-commons' project now. 

But to be honest I'm not sure about the future of Geronimo as EE server. All 
the OSGi stuff is way too complex and I personally never liked it much to have 
tons of different projects with highly different constellations on one JVM. 
This is just too complicated to maintain, too difficult to search errors (e.g. 
how to do javaagent or classreload with different openjpa versions?), freaking 
difficult to read logs, rule out deadlocks between different apps on the same 
app server, etc. This is actually not a Geronimo issue. I do see all these 
problems with big WebLogic and WebSphere installations as well (I'm doing quite 
a few huge customers). Most times it's easier to have 5 smaller servers which 
only serve a single 'application' Of course such an app could consist of 
multiple WARs, etc but they all work nicely together, use the same shared libs, 
etc. 

And in such a case all the complexity of OSGi is just unecessary overhead and 
heavy lifting.


LieGrue,
strub



On Tuesday, 8 July 2014, 20:20, Sandip Ghayal  wrote:


>
>
>Are we loosing steam as a community?
>Thanks,
>Sandip Ghayal
>Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
>
>
> Kevan Miller wrote 
>
>
>Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek.
>
>
>--kevan
>
>
>
>On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
>
>Hi all,
>>
>>Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for July:
>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-07+-+July
>>
>>If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
>>page directly.
>>
>>The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday).
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Jarek
>>
>
>
>

Re: Board report time

[Sandip Ghayal]

Are we loosing steam as a community?

Thanks,

Sandip Ghayal

Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone

 Kevan Miller wrote 

>Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek.
>
>
>--kevan
>
>
>
>On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
>
>Hi all,
>
>Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for July:
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-07+-+July
>
>If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
>page directly.
>
>The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday).
>
>Thanks,
>Jarek
>
>

Re: Board report time

[Kevan Miller]

Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek.

--kevan


On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for July:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-07+-+July
>
> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
> page directly.
>
> The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday).
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek
>

Board report time

[Jarek Gawor]

Hi all,

Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for July:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-07+-+July

If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
page directly.

The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday).

Thanks,
Jarek

Re: Board Report Time

[Kevan Miller]

Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek.

--kevan


On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I created a draft board report for April:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-04+-+April
>
> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
> page directly.
>
> The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday).
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek
>

Board Report Time

[Jarek Gawor]

Hi all,

I created a draft board report for April:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-04+-+April

If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
page directly.

The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday).

Thanks,
Jarek

Re: Board Report Time

[Mark Struberg]

+1

LieGrue,
strub





>
> From: Alan Cabrera 
>To: "dev@geronimo.apache.org Developers"  
>Sent: Wednesday, 8 January 2014, 22:22
>Subject: Re: Board Report Time
> 
>
>
>+1  Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Alan
>
>
>On Jan 8, 2014, at 10:50 AM, Kevan Miller  wrote:
>
>Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek!
>>--kevan
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
>>
>>Last chance to review / update the draft. I will publish it later today.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Jarek
>>>
>>>
>>>On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
>>>> Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January:
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January
>>>>
>>>> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
>>>> page directly.
>>>>
>>>> The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday).
>>>>
>>>> Jarek
>>>
>>
>
>
>

Re: Board Report Time

[Alan Cabrera]

+1  Thanks!


Regards,
Alan

On Jan 8, 2014, at 10:50 AM, Kevan Miller  wrote:

> Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek!
> --kevan
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
> Last chance to review / update the draft. I will publish it later today.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jarek
> 
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
> > Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January
> >
> > If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
> > page directly.
> >
> > The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday).
> >
> > Jarek
> 

Re: Board Report Time

[Alan Cabrera]

+1  Thanks!


Regards,
Alan

On Jan 8, 2014, at 10:50 AM, Kevan Miller  wrote:

> Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek!
> --kevan
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
> Last chance to review / update the draft. I will publish it later today.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jarek
> 
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
> > Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January
> >
> > If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
> > page directly.
> >
> > The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday).
> >
> > Jarek
> 

Re: Board Report Time

[Alan Cabrera]

+1  Thanks!


Regards,
Alan

On Jan 8, 2014, at 10:50 AM, Kevan Miller  wrote:

> Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek!
> --kevan
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
> Last chance to review / update the draft. I will publish it later today.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jarek
> 
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
> > Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January
> >
> > If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
> > page directly.
> >
> > The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday).
> >
> > Jarek
> 

Re: Board Report Time

[Kevan Miller]

Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek!
--kevan


On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:

> Last chance to review / update the draft. I will publish it later today.
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
> > Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January
> >
> > If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
> > page directly.
> >
> > The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday).
> >
> > Jarek
>

Re: Board Report Time

[Jarek Gawor]

Last chance to review / update the draft. I will publish it later today.

Thanks,
Jarek

On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:
> Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January
>
> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
> page directly.
>
> The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday).
>
> Jarek

Board Report Time

[Jarek Gawor]

Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for January:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-01+-+January

If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the
page directly.

The report is due on the 8th (Wednesday).

Jarek

Re: Board Report Time

[Alan D. Cabrera]

+1


Regards,
Alan

On Oct 4, 2013, at 11:13 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:

> I created a draft board report for October:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2013-10+-+October
> 
> If I missed something please let me know of update the page.
> 
> The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday).
> 
> Jarek

Re: Board Report Time

[Kevan Miller]

Thanks Jarek. Looks good to me.

--kevan


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Jarek Gawor  wrote:

> I created a draft board report for October:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2013-10+-+October
>
> If I missed something please let me know of update the page.
>
> The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday).
>
> Jarek
>

Board Report Time

[Jarek Gawor]

I created a draft board report for October:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2013-10+-+October

If I missed something please let me know of update the page.

The report is due on the 9th (Wednesday).

Jarek