Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Hi Vasiliy, I put a draft out about two weeks ago and need to publish the final. I'd expect with Thanksgiving and some other stuff I'd be able to get going in early December. On Nov 13, 2007, at 10:40 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Matt, Are there any news on that? :) Thanks! Vasily -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:48 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ? Excellent ... I'm finishing some other performance work. When I get that completed I'd like to get this tested. It will be nice to finally run the monster ;-P On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Matt, Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news! I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I could, here's what I have now: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- app.x ml http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- db.xm l http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- jms.x ml http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/ SPECjAppServer2004 It has issues working (e. g. for now I can't lookup the beans through JNDI externally), but at least it deploys with no errors. I assume some things there are anyway obsolete and have to be replaced. Please also note issues OPENEJB-700 and OPENEJB-701 filed while trying to make the things above work, adjustments were made to workaround OPENEJB-701. Thanks alot for your help! Vasily -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:56 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ? Vasily, We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3 and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/ repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/ On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT? Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/ When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue GERONIMO-2128 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ GERONIMO-2128 is related to this issue, and it's still open. At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary support in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL 1.3: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926 Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the current situation with this issue? Thank you very much! Vasily Zakharov Intel ESSD --- Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
RE: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Whoa, that's great! If there's anything I could do to help - I'd gladly do. Thank you! Vasily -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 9:36 PM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ? Hi Vasiliy, I put a draft out about two weeks ago and need to publish the final. I'd expect with Thanksgiving and some other stuff I'd be able to get going in early December. On Nov 13, 2007, at 10:40 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Matt, Are there any news on that? :) Thanks! Vasily -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:48 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ? Excellent ... I'm finishing some other performance work. When I get that completed I'd like to get this tested. It will be nice to finally run the monster ;-P On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Matt, Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news! I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I could, here's what I have now: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- app.x ml http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- db.xm l http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- jms.x ml http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/ SPECjAppServer2004 It has issues working (e. g. for now I can't lookup the beans through JNDI externally), but at least it deploys with no errors. I assume some things there are anyway obsolete and have to be replaced. Please also note issues OPENEJB-700 and OPENEJB-701 filed while trying to make the things above work, adjustments were made to workaround OPENEJB-701. Thanks alot for your help! Vasily -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:56 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ? Vasily, We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3 and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/ repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/ On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT? Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/ When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue GERONIMO-2128 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ GERONIMO-2128 is related to this issue, and it's still open. At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary support in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL 1.3: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926 Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the current situation with this issue? Thank you very much! Vasily Zakharov Intel ESSD --- Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
RE: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Matt, Are there any news on that? :) Thanks! Vasily -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:48 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ? Excellent ... I'm finishing some other performance work. When I get that completed I'd like to get this tested. It will be nice to finally run the monster ;-P On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Matt, Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news! I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I could, here's what I have now: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- app.x ml http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- db.xm l http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- jms.x ml http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/ SPECjAppServer2004 It has issues working (e. g. for now I can't lookup the beans through JNDI externally), but at least it deploys with no errors. I assume some things there are anyway obsolete and have to be replaced. Please also note issues OPENEJB-700 and OPENEJB-701 filed while trying to make the things above work, adjustments were made to workaround OPENEJB-701. Thanks alot for your help! Vasily -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:56 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ? Vasily, We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3 and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/ repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/ On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT? Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/ When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue GERONIMO-2128 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ GERONIMO-2128 is related to this issue, and it's still open. At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary support in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL 1.3: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926 Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the current situation with this issue? Thank you very much! Vasily Zakharov Intel ESSD --- Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
RE: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Yeah, indeed. :) Thank you! Vasily -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:48 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ? Excellent ... I'm finishing some other performance work. When I get that completed I'd like to get this tested. It will be nice to finally run the monster ;-P On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Matt, Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news! I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I could, here's what I have now: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- app.x ml http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- db.xm l http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- jms.x ml http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/ SPECjAppServer2004 It has issues working (e. g. for now I can't lookup the beans through JNDI externally), but at least it deploys with no errors. I assume some things there are anyway obsolete and have to be replaced. Please also note issues OPENEJB-700 and OPENEJB-701 filed while trying to make the things above work, adjustments were made to workaround OPENEJB-701. Thanks alot for your help! Vasily -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:56 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ? Vasily, We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3 and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/ repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/ On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT? Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/ When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue GERONIMO-2128 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ GERONIMO-2128 is related to this issue, and it's still open. At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary support in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL 1.3: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926 Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the current situation with this issue? Thank you very much! Vasily Zakharov Intel ESSD --- Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Vasily, We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3 and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/ repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/ On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT? Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/ When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue GERONIMO-2128 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2128 is related to this issue, and it's still open. At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary support in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL 1.3: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926 Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the current situation with this issue? Thank you very much! Vasily Zakharov Intel ESSD --- Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
RE: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Hi, Matt, Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news! I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I could, here's what I have now: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-app.x ml http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-db.xm l http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-jms.x ml http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/SPECjAppServer2004 It has issues working (e. g. for now I can't lookup the beans through JNDI externally), but at least it deploys with no errors. I assume some things there are anyway obsolete and have to be replaced. Please also note issues OPENEJB-700 and OPENEJB-701 filed while trying to make the things above work, adjustments were made to workaround OPENEJB-701. Thanks alot for your help! Vasily -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:56 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ? Vasily, We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3 and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/ repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/ On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT? Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/ When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue GERONIMO-2128 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2128 is related to this issue, and it's still open. At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary support in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL 1.3: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926 Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the current situation with this issue? Thank you very much! Vasily Zakharov Intel ESSD --- Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Excellent ... I'm finishing some other performance work. When I get that completed I'd like to get this tested. It will be nice to finally run the monster ;-P On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Matt, Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news! I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I could, here's what I have now: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- app.x ml http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- db.xm l http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas- jms.x ml http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/ SPECjAppServer2004 It has issues working (e. g. for now I can't lookup the beans through JNDI externally), but at least it deploys with no errors. I assume some things there are anyway obsolete and have to be replaced. Please also note issues OPENEJB-700 and OPENEJB-701 filed while trying to make the things above work, adjustments were made to workaround OPENEJB-701. Thanks alot for your help! Vasily -Original Message- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:56 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ? Vasily, We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3 and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/ repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/ On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: Hi, Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT? Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/ When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue GERONIMO-2128 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ GERONIMO-2128 is related to this issue, and it's still open. At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary support in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL 1.3: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926 Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the current situation with this issue? Thank you very much! Vasily Zakharov Intel ESSD --- Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation, Chapayevsky Per, 14. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
