Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: There's a source file missing a license header. Not sure if it was added after my last scan of the code or if I just missed it. Anyway, it needs to be fixed. All servers start. I'm getting some [info] log messages sent to STDOUT, but I don't think that should hold up an M1 release. I've scanned the jetty java ee5 binary -- looks good. Working on tomcat and some more sanity checks. Other that the license header, things look good... --kevan Kevan, If you'll add it to tags I'll re-spin that module. This doesn't affect the server binaries so updating and spinning that module should be fine. I'd say thanks for finding this but I now officially hate your keen eye :) On the positive note...we are doing way better than we ever have previously in terms of legal clearance so thanks to you and all the others making this easier. I think Jason's legal plugin plus the RAT tool, plus all the paranoid eyes are helping :)
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
anita, If I turn logging up to INFO in var/log/server-log4j.properties I get information in the log. On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, I opened this thread for general comments and questions about the release. Let's have the discussions here and leave the vote thread for +/- voting only so it will be easier to process Thanks. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: There's a source file missing a license header. Not sure if it was added after my last scan of the code or if I just missed it. Anyway, it needs to be fixed. All servers start. I'm getting some [info] log messages sent to STDOUT, but I don't think that should hold up an M1 release. I've scanned the jetty java ee5 binary -- looks good. Working on tomcat and some more sanity checks. Other that the license header, things look good... --kevan Kevan, If you'll add it to tags I'll re-spin that module. This doesn't affect the server binaries so updating and spinning that module should be fine. I'd say thanks for finding this but I now officially hate your keen eye :) On the positive note...we are doing way better than we ever have previously in terms of legal clearance so thanks to you and all the others making this easier. I think Jason's legal plugin plus the RAT tool, plus all the paranoid eyes are helping :) Ok. Fixed with 488326. --kevan
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
Matt, I had to change the following lines in server-log4j.properties to get system information logged: log4j.rootLogger=INFO, CONSOLE, FILE log4j.appender.FILE.Threshold=INFO In addition I see the following stack trace during shutdown. A fix for this is already available in rev 488106: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r488106geronimo-server-trunk-modules-geronimo-naming-src-main-java-org-apache-geronimo-gjndi-binding-GBeanBinding.java-p7930963.html Is it a good idea to supress all warning messages like this even for a M1 release ? Thanks Anita 12:39:24,552 WARN [BasicLifecycleMonitor] Exception occured while notifying listener java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.geronimo.gjndi.binding.GBeanBinding.removeBinding(GBeanBinding.java:159) at org.apache.geronimo.gjndi.binding.GBeanBinding$GBeanLifecycleListener.stopped(GBeanBinding.java:108) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicLifecycleMonitor.fireStoppedEvent(BasicLifecycleMonitor.java:197) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicLifecycleMonitor.access$500(BasicLifecycleMonitor.java:41) at ... --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: anita, If I turn logging up to INFO in var/log/server-log4j.properties I get information in the log. On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, I opened this thread for general comments and questions about the release. Let's have the discussions here and leave the vote thread for +/- voting only so it will be easier to process Thanks. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
I think its a preference. At this point I think M1 is what it is and we'll update the Wiki with known issues. On Dec 18, 2006, at 12:49 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: Matt, I had to change the following lines in server-log4j.properties to get system information logged: log4j.rootLogger=INFO, CONSOLE, FILE log4j.appender.FILE.Threshold=INFO In addition I see the following stack trace during shutdown. A fix for this is already available in rev 488106: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r488106geronimo- server-trunk-modules-geronimo-naming-src-main-java-org-apache- geronimo-gjndi-binding-GBeanBinding.java-p7930963.html Is it a good idea to supress all warning messages like this even for a M1 release ? Thanks Anita 12:39:24,552 WARN [BasicLifecycleMonitor] Exception occured while notifying listener java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.geronimo.gjndi.binding.GBeanBinding.removeBinding (GBeanBinding.java:159) at org.apache.geronimo.gjndi.binding.GBeanBinding $GBeanLifecycleListener.stopped(GBeanBinding.java:108) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicLifecycleMonitor.fireStoppedEven t(BasicLifecycleMonitor.java:197) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicLifecycleMonitor.access$500 (BasicLifecycleMonitor.java:41) at ... --- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: anita, If I turn logging up to INFO in var/log/server-log4j.properties I get information in the log. On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, I opened this thread for general comments and questions about the release. Let's have the discussions here and leave the vote thread for +/- voting only so it will be easier to process Thanks. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
Thanks for finding this Kevan. I reposted the source, there are no modules. Updated source is in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M1/ Thanks for finding this. On Dec 18, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: There's a source file missing a license header. Not sure if it was added after my last scan of the code or if I just missed it. Anyway, it needs to be fixed. All servers start. I'm getting some [info] log messages sent to STDOUT, but I don't think that should hold up an M1 release. I've scanned the jetty java ee5 binary -- looks good. Working on tomcat and some more sanity checks. Other that the license header, things look good... --kevan Kevan, If you'll add it to tags I'll re-spin that module. This doesn't affect the server binaries so updating and spinning that module should be fine. I'd say thanks for finding this but I now officially hate your keen eye :) On the positive note...we are doing way better than we ever have previously in terms of legal clearance so thanks to you and all the others making this easier. I think Jason's legal plugin plus the RAT tool, plus all the paranoid eyes are helping :) Ok. Fixed with 488326. --kevan Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M1 Release
Rerouting to this thread from [VOTE] 2.0-M1 Release Hi All, I have two basic comments/questions. 1- I see a bunch of INFO messages in both Tomcat and Jetty at startup, not a show stopper for this release. 2- Deployment on Jetty is not behaving exactly as I expected. Not sure if I messed up the deployment plans given the new specs, however this same WAR works just fine with Tomcat. In Jetty I deploy a WAR and when I access the application it will list the content of the WAR, if I click on the JSP it will work fine. Something like not following the web.xml welcome-file maybe? The context-root however is correct. Just in case you may ask, here are the deployment plans: geronimo-web.xml == ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? web-app xmlns=http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/web-1.2; environment moduleId groupIdsample.applications/groupId artifactIdHelloWorldApp/artifactId version2.0/version typewar/type /moduleId /environment context-root/hello/context-root /web-app == web.xml == ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? web-app version=2.4 xmlns=http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee; xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; xsi:schemaLocation=http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd; welcome-file-list welcome-fileHelloWorld.jsp/welcome-file /welcome-file-list /web-app == Am I missing anything obvious? Cheers! Hernan Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, I opened this thread for general comments and questions about the release. Let's have the discussions here and leave the vote thread for +/- voting only so it will be easier to process Thanks. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
