Re: Systemd support in 2.4
On 09/15/2014 08:00 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote: On 09/14/2014 01:21 PM, Martynas Bendorius wrote: Hello, Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available in trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet? Hi, I think mod_systemd could be proposed for 2.4 branch (maybe even with the changes adding socket activation), but for mod_journald, we would have to backport modular logging, which breaks the API/ABI and therefore I'm afraid that won't happen in 2.4 branch :(. mod_systemd and socket activation proposed in r1625531. Jan Kaluza Jan Kaluza As we have a lot of distributions already using systemd by default (CentOS/RHEL 7, Fedora, Arch Linux, CoreOS, openSUSE), and more of them are going to use systemd by default (Debian 8 (Jessie), Ubuntu), it requires manual patching of apache for the support of systemd/journald. Thank you!
Re: Systemd support in 2.4
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/14/2014 01:21 PM, Martynas Bendorius wrote: Hello, Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available in trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet? Hi, I think mod_systemd could be proposed for 2.4 branch (maybe even with the changes adding socket activation), but for mod_journald, we would have to backport modular logging, which breaks the API/ABI and therefore I'm afraid that won't happen in 2.4 branch :(. I have an old patch somewhere that doesn't break the API/ABI, and accommodates such differences as syslog being built-in in 2.4.x. I didn't realize that anybody besides me actually cared. I'll try to find time to see how it fits in 2.4.x-HEAD. Jan Kaluza As we have a lot of distributions already using systemd by default (CentOS/RHEL 7, Fedora, Arch Linux, CoreOS, openSUSE), and more of them are going to use systemd by default (Debian 8 (Jessie), Ubuntu), it requires manual patching of apache for the support of systemd/journald. Thank you! -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
Re: Systemd support in 2.4
Whether we like it or not, systemd is here to stay. systemd: The Emacs of Linux init implementations. *grin* On Sep 17, 2014, at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/14/2014 01:21 PM, Martynas Bendorius wrote: Hello, Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available in trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet? Hi, I think mod_systemd could be proposed for 2.4 branch (maybe even with the changes adding socket activation), but for mod_journald, we would have to backport modular logging, which breaks the API/ABI and therefore I'm afraid that won't happen in 2.4 branch :(. I have an old patch somewhere that doesn't break the API/ABI, and accommodates such differences as syslog being built-in in 2.4.x. I didn't realize that anybody besides me actually cared. I'll try to find time to see how it fits in 2.4.x-HEAD. Jan Kaluza As we have a lot of distributions already using systemd by default (CentOS/RHEL 7, Fedora, Arch Linux, CoreOS, openSUSE), and more of them are going to use systemd by default (Debian 8 (Jessie), Ubuntu), it requires manual patching of apache for the support of systemd/journald. Thank you! -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
