Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-11-11 Thread Reindl Harald



Am 11.10.2015 um 22:06 schrieb Rainer Jung:

Am 11.10.2015 um 21:14 schrieb Reindl Harald:



Am 11.10.2015 um 21:07 schrieb Yann Ylavic:

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Reindl Harald
 wrote:


Google only showed discussions, Bugzilla and so on and finding the new
directive is hard - maybe the hint should made it into the changelog
for GA
release


Yes you're right, I should have mentioned that directive in the
CHANGES entry.
Unfortunately I'm afraid it's too late now, the 2.4.17 tag is frozen.
Hopefully the (new) documentation will quickly be indexed...


no problem since it's diabled by default


"ab -c 100 -n 5 http://small-image.gif; did not make me that happy
after a short test on a quadcore machine, after some time httpd stopped
to respond for a tinay statical image with a few bytes

# SO_REUSEPORT support
# = 2.4.17>
#  ListenCoresBucketsRatio 4
# 


You might run into problems if your server accumulates to many TIME_WAIT
connections. Check their number in the "netstat -an" output.

ab without "-k" does in connection per request and if those are only
used very short and the server is fast you can end up with a couple of
10.000s of TIME_WAIT connections (independent of SO_REUSEPORT)


sorry for the last reply

no, it's only when "ListenCoresBucketsRatio 4" is used while otherwise a 
"ab -c 100 -n 500 http://small-image.gif; is no problem




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-12 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
>
> NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.
>
> Thx!
>
>
[X] +1: no regression, works with my existing production config with no
apparent problems

On Fedora 22, the only platform where I ran the test suite (latest version
as of yesterday afternoon), I'm getting a bunch of errors for http2 which I
don't see mentioned elsewhere.  I guess they're most likely triggered by
the Perl side of things???

t/modules/http2.t ... 1/52 # Failed test 11 in
t/modules/http2.t at line 174
# Failed test 12 in t/modules/http2.t at line 176
# Failed test 13 in t/modules/http2.t at line 174 fail #2
# Failed test 14 in t/modules/http2.t at line 176 fail #2
# Failed test 15 in t/modules/http2.t at line 162
# Failed test 16 in t/modules/http2.t at line 164
# Failed test 17 in t/modules/http2.t at line 162 fail #2
# Failed test 18 in t/modules/http2.t at line 164 fail #2
# Failed test 19 in t/modules/http2.t at line 174 fail #3
# Failed test 20 in t/modules/http2.t at line 176 fail #3
# Failed test 21 in t/modules/http2.t at line 162 fail #3
# Failed test 22 in t/modules/http2.t at line 164 fail #3
# Failed test 23 in t/modules/http2.t at line 162 fail #4
# Failed test 24 in t/modules/http2.t at line 164 fail #4
# Failed test 25 in t/modules/http2.t at line 162 fail #5
# Failed test 26 in t/modules/http2.t at line 164 fail #5
# Failed test 37 in t/modules/http2.t at line 174 fail #4
# Failed test 38 in t/modules/http2.t at line 176 fail #4
# Failed test 39 in t/modules/http2.t at line 174 fail #5
# Failed test 40 in t/modules/http2.t at line 176 fail #5
# Failed test 41 in t/modules/http2.t at line 162 fail #6
# Failed test 42 in t/modules/http2.t at line 164 fail #6
# Failed test 43 in t/modules/http2.t at line 162 fail #7
# Failed test 44 in t/modules/http2.t at line 164 fail #7
# Failed test 45 in t/modules/http2.t at line 174 fail #6
# Failed test 46 in t/modules/http2.t at line 176 fail #6
# Failed test 47 in t/modules/http2.t at line 162 fail #8
# Failed test 48 in t/modules/http2.t at line 164 fail #8
# Failed test 49 in t/modules/http2.t at line 162 fail #9
# Failed test 50 in t/modules/http2.t at line 164 fail #9
# Failed test 51 in t/modules/http2.t at line 162 fail #10
# Failed test 52 in t/modules/http2.t at line 164 fail #10
t/modules/http2.t ... Failed 32/52 subtests

(no other errors, DAV tests were skipped due to lack of appropriate Perl
module)

-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-12 Thread Rainer Jung

Am 09.10.2015 um 19:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
at the usual place:

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/

I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.

[X] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.

Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.


+1 to release and thank a bunch for RMing.
Hooray to HTTP/2.

In short: No regressions found.

Detailed report:

- Sigs and hashes OK
- contents of tarballs identical
- contents of tag and tarballs identical
  except for expected deltas
  (we could cleanup some m4 files in apr-util/xml/expat/conftools
   at the end of buildconf, no regression)

Built on

- Solaris 8+10 Sparc as 32 Bit Binaries
- SLES 10+11 (64 Bits)
- RHEL 6 (64 Bits)

For all platforms built

- with default (shared), shared and static modules
- with module sets none, few, most, all, reallyall and default
  (always mod_privileges disabled)
- using --enable-load-all-modules
- against "included" APR/APU from deps tarball,
  plus external APR/APU 1.5.2/1.5.4

- using external libraries
  - expat 2.1.0
  - pcre 8.37
  - openssl 1.0.2d
  - lua 5.2.4
  - distcache 1.5.1
  - libxml2 2.9.2
  - libnghttp2 1.3.4

- Tool chain:
- platform gcc except for Solaris
  (gcc 4.1.2 for Solaris 8 and 4.9.2 for Solaris 10)
- CFLAGS: -O2 -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing
  (and -mpcu=v9 on Solaris)

All builds succeeded
  - one compiler warning (no regression)
ssl/ssl_util_stapling.c:657: warning: 'ok' may be used uninitialized in 
this function


Tested for

- Solaris 8+10 (32), SLES 10+11 (64), RHEL 6 (64)
- MPMs prefork, worker, event
  (except event on Solaris8, unsupported)
- default, shared and static modules
- log levels info, debug and trace8
- module set reallyall (122 modules plus MPMs)
- Solaris 8 and SLES 10 still ongoing but so far OK

The following test failures were seen:

a Test 4 or 5 in t/modules/dav.t:
  Happens for 38 out of 319 runs (7 on SLES 10, 16 on SLES 11,
  13 on RHEL6, 2 on Solaris 10).
  Creation, modified and now times not in the correct order.
  This seems to be a system issue, all tests done on NFS,
  many tested on virtualized guests.
  Not a regression.

b Various tests in t/apache/expr_string.t: (6, 11, 14, 17, 20 ,23)
  Happens for 41 out of 319 runs (31 on SLES 10, 1 on SLES 11,
  9 on RHEL6).
  The failure is always on line 68, where the error_log contents
  are checked.
  Not a regression.

c Test 59 of t/modules/include.t only and always on
  Solaris.
  This is due to a bug in the test, which uses strftime()
  with a "%s" pattern that is not supported on Solaris.
  Until recently the server and the test client both returned
  verbatim "%s" and the test succeeded. After updating some
  Perl modules for the http2 tests, the perl client even
  on Solaris now supports "%s" in strftime and the test starts
  to fail. It seems we have to fix the test.

d Failure of t/modules/session.t on SlES 10.
  Warning: Use of "shift" without parentheses is ambiguous at line 39.
  Perl version is 5.8.8. The script uses a somewhat advances
  $x = shift // "NOTFOUND";
  construct, which seems to be ambiguous for old Perl (I had
  to look in the fine perl docs for the // operator).
  We could probably use a less elegant but more compatible
  construct instead.

e Failure of two tests in t/modules/http2.t.
  The tests do not run in a consistent order, so the test numbers don't
  help, but it always seems to be the "misdirected" test under SSL
  returning 404 instead of 421. Analysis by Yann indicates, that
  the test might be broken and needs some refinement to actually
  trigger a 421.

Regards,

Rainer


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-12 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.

+1

Tested on AIX 7.1/ppc64/xlc

After much head-scratching, compiling of new openssl/nghttp2, and lots
of myserious CPAN stuff, Test framework passed everything but the two
421 Misidireected testcases in http2.t already discussed elsewhere.

Michael Felt -- if you're listening, it would be nice if perzlr had
openssl 1.0.2 and nghttp2.  The latter compiled quite easily with just
-qcpluscmt.


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
A little over 4.5 hours until the VOTE closes...

test early, test often! :)

> On Oct 9, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
> at the usual place:
> 
>   http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> 
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
> 
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
> 
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
> 
> NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.
> 
> Thx!
> 



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-12 Thread Stefan Eissing
+1

> Am 12.10.2015 um 15:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
> 
> A little over 4.5 hours until the VOTE closes...
> 
> test early, test often! :)
> 
>> On Oct 9, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
>> at the usual place:
>> 
>>  http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>> 
>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
>> 
>> [ ] +1: Good to go
>> [ ] +0: meh
>> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>> 
>> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
>> 
>> NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.
>> 
>> Thx!
>> 
> 



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-12 Thread Steffen

All looks fine with building and running Win32/Win64 VC14/11/10

No regressions/issues seen.

Build with:

nghttp2 1.3.4 
apr 1.5.2 with IPv6 enabled 
apr-util 1.5.4 with Crypto OpenSSL enabled 
apr-iconv 1.2.1 
openssl 1.0.2d +asm 
zlib 1.2.8 +asm 
pcre 8.37 
httpd.exe with OPENSSL_Applink and VC14 SupportedOS Manifest 
libxml2 2.9.2 
lua 5.1.5 
expat 2.1.0



Steffen

-Original Message- 
From: Jim Jagielski

Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 10:33 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: httpd
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.16 as GA

The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.16 can be found
at the usual place:

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/

I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.16 GA.


-Original Message- 
From: Jim Jagielski 
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 7:40 PM 
To: httpd 
Subject: ** [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA 


The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
at the usual place:

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/

I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.

[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.

Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.

NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.

Thx!



[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
The VOTE is CLOSED.

With more than the required 3 +1 (binding) votes, the VOTE
PASSES!

Thx to all testers and contributors. I will start the process
of pushing to the mirrors and will announce on Weds.

> On Oct 9, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
> at the usual place:
> 
>   http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> 
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
> 
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
> 
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
> 
> NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.
> 
> Thx!
> 



Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-12 Thread Stefan Eissing
Yay! Thanks to all!

> Am 12.10.2015 um 19:41 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
> 
> The VOTE is CLOSED.
> 
> With more than the required 3 +1 (binding) votes, the VOTE
> PASSES!
> 
> Thx to all testers and contributors. I will start the process
> of pushing to the mirrors and will announce on Weds.
> 
>> On Oct 9, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
>> at the usual place:
>> 
>>http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>> 
>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
>> 
>> [ ] +1: Good to go
>> [ ] +0: meh
>> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>> 
>> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
>> 
>> NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.
>> 
>> Thx!
> 


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-11 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
>
> [X] +1: Good to go

* md5/sha1/asc
=> OK

* Debian 8.2 (Jessie)
- Linux 3.14.15-2
- autoconf 2.69-8
- automake 1.14.1-4
- libtool 2.4.2-1.11
- gcc 4.9.2-10
- libc6 2.19-18+deb8u1
- openssl 1.0.1k-3+deb8u1
- pcre 8.35-3.3
=> All tests passed.

* Debian 7.9 (Wheezy)
- Linux 3.2.68-1+deb7u4
- autoconf 2.69-1
- automake 1.11.6-1
- libtool 2.4.2-1.1
- gcc 4.7.2-5
- libc6 2.13-38+deb7u8
- openssl 1.0.1e-2+deb7u17
- pcre 8.30-5
=> All passed passed.

* Debian 6.0.10 (Squeeze)
- Linux 2.6.32-48squeeze13
- autoconf 2.67-2
- automake 1.11.1-1+squeeze11
- libtool 2.2.6b-2
- gcc 4.4.5-8
- libc6 2.11.3-4+deb6u6
- openssl 0.9.8o-4squeeze21
- pcre 8.02-1.1
=> No regression.

Thanks Jim!


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-11 Thread Reindl Harald



Am 11.10.2015 um 21:07 schrieb Yann Ylavic:

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Reindl Harald  wrote:


Google only showed discussions, Bugzilla and so on and finding the new
directive is hard - maybe the hint should made it into the changelog for GA
release


Yes you're right, I should have mentioned that directive in the CHANGES entry.
Unfortunately I'm afraid it's too late now, the 2.4.17 tag is frozen.
Hopefully the (new) documentation will quickly be indexed...


no problem since it's diabled by default


"ab -c 100 -n 5 http://small-image.gif; did not make me that happy 
after a short test on a quadcore machine, after some time httpd stopped 
to respond for a tinay statical image with a few bytes


# SO_REUSEPORT support
# = 2.4.17>
#  ListenCoresBucketsRatio 4
# 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-11 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Reindl Harald  wrote:
>
> "ab -c 100 -n 5 http://small-image.gif; did not make me that happy after
> a short test on a quadcore machine, after some time httpd stopped to respond
> for a tinay statical image with a few bytes

Hm, with 4 cores and a ratio of 4, there is only one bucket per
listener, which is the same as the default.
Did you try the same test without the directive or with a ratio of 0?
(I rather suspect a connectivity issue with ab).


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-11 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Reindl Harald  wrote:
>
> Am 09.10.2015 um 19:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>
>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
>> at the usual place:
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>
>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
>>
>> [ ] +1: Good to go
>> [ ] +0: meh
>> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why
>
>
> +1 on Fedora 21 / 22 x86_64
>
> one question:
> MPMs: Support SO_REUSEPORT to create multiple duplicated listener
>
> does that get automatic enabled on recent Linux kernels or is there any
> configuration needed to enable it?

You need to configure this directive:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mpm_common.html#listencoresbucketsratio

Regards,
Yann.


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-11 Thread Reindl Harald



Am 11.10.2015 um 20:51 schrieb Yann Ylavic:

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Reindl Harald  wrote:


Am 09.10.2015 um 19:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:


The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
at the usual place:

 http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/

I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.

[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why



+1 on Fedora 21 / 22 x86_64

one question:
MPMs: Support SO_REUSEPORT to create multiple duplicated listener

does that get automatic enabled on recent Linux kernels or is there any
configuration needed to enable it?


You need to configure this directive:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mpm_common.html#listencoresbucketsratio


thanks!

Google only showed discussions, Bugzilla and so on and finding the new 
directive is hard - maybe the hint should made it into the changelog for 
GA release



will give it a try

however, 2.4.17 without touch configs looks fine



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-11 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Reindl Harald  wrote:
>
> Google only showed discussions, Bugzilla and so on and finding the new
> directive is hard - maybe the hint should made it into the changelog for GA
> release

Yes you're right, I should have mentioned that directive in the CHANGES entry.
Unfortunately I'm afraid it's too late now, the 2.4.17 tag is frozen.
Hopefully the (new) documentation will quickly be indexed...


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-11 Thread Rainer Jung

Am 11.10.2015 um 21:14 schrieb Reindl Harald:



Am 11.10.2015 um 21:07 schrieb Yann Ylavic:

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Reindl Harald
 wrote:


Google only showed discussions, Bugzilla and so on and finding the new
directive is hard - maybe the hint should made it into the changelog
for GA
release


Yes you're right, I should have mentioned that directive in the
CHANGES entry.
Unfortunately I'm afraid it's too late now, the 2.4.17 tag is frozen.
Hopefully the (new) documentation will quickly be indexed...


no problem since it's diabled by default


"ab -c 100 -n 5 http://small-image.gif; did not make me that happy
after a short test on a quadcore machine, after some time httpd stopped
to respond for a tinay statical image with a few bytes

# SO_REUSEPORT support
# = 2.4.17>
#  ListenCoresBucketsRatio 4
# 


You might run into problems if your server accumulates to many TIME_WAIT 
connections. Check their number in the "netstat -an" output.


ab without "-k" does in connection per request and if those are only 
used very short and the server is fast you can end up with a couple of 
10.000s of TIME_WAIT connections (independent of SO_REUSEPORT).


Regards,

Rainer



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-11 Thread Reindl Harald



Am 11.10.2015 um 21:25 schrieb Yann Ylavic:

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Reindl Harald  wrote:


"ab -c 100 -n 5 http://small-image.gif; did not make me that happy after
a short test on a quadcore machine, after some time httpd stopped to respond
for a tinay statical image with a few bytes


Hm, with 4 cores and a ratio of 4, there is only one bucket per
listener, which is the same as the default.
Did you try the same test without the directive or with a ratio of 0?
(I rather suspect a connectivity issue with ab)


i did not test it much and honestly i am not able to make a decision 
based on 
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mpm_common.html#listencoresbucketsratio 



without the directive all is unchanged and stable

0 is not accepted which i would consider a bug given
the docs days default  "ListenCoresBucketsRatio 0 (disabled)"
AH00526: Syntax error on line 48 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd-core.conf:
ListenCoresBucketsRatio must be > 0

= 2.4.17>
 ListenCoresBucketsRatio 0

__

i just wanted to test the new feature on a 4.2.3 kernel

"ab" don't scale well but likely not a connectivity issue runnig it on 
the same machine like httpd




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-10 Thread Stefan Eissing

> Am 09.10.2015 um 19:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
> 
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
> at the usual place:
> 
>   http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> 
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
> 
> [ ] +1: Good to go

Apart from the sslvar lookup failures reported in a separate mail

Tested:
* OSX 10.11 / Xcode 7.0.1, x64
  - event, worker, prefork: http2
* Ubuntu 14.04.1, x64
  - event, worker, prefork: http2


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-10 Thread Noel Butler

On 10/10/2015 03:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:

The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
at the usual place:

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/

I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.

[X] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.

Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.

NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.




built with mysql, apr-1.5.2 and apr-util 1.5.4
all good   slackware 13.1/13.37/14.0/14.1


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-10 Thread Kaspar Brand
On 09.10.2015 19:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
> at the usual place:
> 
>   http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> 
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
> 
> [X] +1: Good to go

Tested with mod_ssl compiled against OpenSSL 0.9.8/1.0.0/1.0.1/1.0.2.

Kaspar


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-10 Thread Stefan Eissing
Will check the release later today. The nit in the doc should not hold us back.

> Am 10.10.2015 um 00:02 schrieb Gregg Smith :
> 
>> On 10/9/2015 10:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
>> at the usual place:
>> 
>>http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>> 
>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
> Not a vote, I haven't gotten that far yet. It's been pointed out to me that 
> on our potential first release of the new module that the docs for it are 
> wrong : (  I suppose this happens when something is renamed at a relatively 
> last minute.
> 
> The docs still state the module identifier as  h2_module which of course it's 
> http2_module.
> 


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-09 Thread Gregg Smith

On 10/9/2015 10:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
at the usual place:

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/

I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
Not a vote, I haven't gotten that far yet. It's been pointed out to me 
that on our potential first release of the new module that the docs for 
it are wrong : (  I suppose this happens when something is renamed at a 
relatively last minute.


The docs still state the module identifier as  h2_module which of course 
it's http2_module.




[VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
at the usual place:

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/

I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.

[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.

Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.

NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.

Thx!



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

2015-10-09 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 10/09/2015 07:40 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
> at the usual place:
> 
>   http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> 
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
> 
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
> 
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
> 
> NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.
> 
> Thx!
> 

+1 (binding)

I ran it through my usual tests, results at
http://compliance.rocks/result.html?1e67b9ba

Might need to tweak some headers, but meh..

configure, compile, install, run - all works fine (Ubuntu 14.04).
AAAND it installs mod_lua just fine, so yay!

With regards,
Daniel.