Re: Adding timestamp to apache releases?
On 01.10.2007, at 12:22, Erik Abele wrote: On 01.10.2007, at 09:58, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: ... I like the idea of adding a date to each news item, be it on httpd.a.o, or our www.apache.org. +1. +1, see attached patch which adds dates to the index and download pages (see changes to site.vsl which add a 2nd column to the relevant section headers as soon as a new date= attribute is present). Please test and give your opinion, works for me on Safari and Firefox... Got a chance to test it on IE today, looks fine so I've added it at the moment. Cheers, Erik
Re: Adding timestamp to apache releases?
Boyle Owen wrote: Might it be an idea for 2.2.7? I like the idea of adding a date to each news item, be it on httpd.a.o, or our www.apache.org. +1. (Especially since the datestamps of our tarballs are several days prior to each release).
Re: Adding timestamp to apache releases?
On 10/1/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Boyle Owen wrote: Might it be an idea for 2.2.7? I like the idea of adding a date to each news item, be it on httpd.a.o, or our www.apache.org. +1. (Especially since the datestamps of our tarballs are several days prior to each release). I like that idea too! +1 -- ~Jorge
Re: Adding timestamp to apache releases?
On 01.10.2007, at 09:58, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Boyle Owen wrote: Might it be an idea for 2.2.7? You can also get it from here for now: http://projects.apache.org/projects/http_server.html or as a feed: http://projects.apache.org/feeds/rss/http_server.xml I like the idea of adding a date to each news item, be it on httpd.a.o, or our www.apache.org. +1. +1, see attached patch which adds dates to the index and download pages (see changes to site.vsl which add a 2nd column to the relevant section headers as soon as a new date= attribute is present). Please test and give your opinion, works for me on Safari and Firefox... Cheers, Erik dates.patch Description: Binary data
Re: Adding timestamp to apache releases?
On Oct 1, 2007, at 12:34 AM, Boyle Owen wrote: Is there a reason for the coyness or is it just an oversight, like people who send out invites to parties with elaborate directions and clip-art but forget to put the date? PGP to the rescue! Just downloaded the release, and Safari preserves the modification time: [EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads $ curl -I http://mirrors.sirium.net/ pub/apache/httpd/httpd-2.2.6.tar.gz HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:51:22 GMT Server: Apache Last-Modified: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 19:31:02 GMT ETag: 547541-5bfe97-46e05576 Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 6028951 Content-Type: application/x-gzip [EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads $ ls -lt httpd-2.2.6.tar.gz* -rw-r--r-- 1 sctemme admin 53 Sep 6 12:31 httpd-2.2.6.tar.gz.md5 -rw-r--r-- 1 sctemme admin 6028951 Sep 6 12:31 httpd-2.2.6.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 sctemme admin 186 Sep 6 12:31 httpd-2.2.6.tar.gz.asc Now when I verify the PGP signature: [EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads $ gpg --verify httpd-2.2.6.tar.gz.asc gpg: Signature made Tue Sep 4 13:09:41 2007 PDT using DSA key ID 08C975E5 gpg: Good signature from Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note the time stamp on the signature. Of course this is the time of the clock on Jim's computer: I don't think GPG can get a trusted timestamp for signatures. I looked through the options and saw none. Perhaps that's something to look into, but for now there is a timestamp on the signature. S. -- Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
