Re: [Survey] Maintained builds - was Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On 25.04.2010 18:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 4/23/2010 8:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 4/23/2010 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: For those who are working on httpd trunk and Linux, what are you using? You raise interesting questions about what the httpd folks actually test on a day to day basis, given the dozen combinations of build approaches. Maintainers, which of the below do you *frequently* use during development against trunk (as opposed to occasional/infrequent testing)? [X] ./configure and build entirely in-tree (httpd/srclib/* etc) [ ] ../httpd/configure into a single seperate vpath tree [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned expat [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned pcre [ ] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned apr[-util] Please check off all-of-the-above that apply, thanks! Regards Rüdiger
Re: [Survey] Maintained builds - was Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On 25.04.2010 18:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 4/23/2010 8:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 4/23/2010 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: For those who are working on httpd trunk and Linux, what are you using? You raise interesting questions about what the httpd folks actually test on a day to day basis, given the dozen combinations of build approaches. Maintainers, which of the below do you *frequently* use during development against trunk (as opposed to occasional/infrequent testing)? [X] ./configure and build entirely in-tree (httpd/srclib/* etc) [ ] ../httpd/configure into a single seperate vpath tree [ ] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned expat [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned pcre [ ] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned apr[-util] Please check off all-of-the-above that apply, thanks! Regards, Rainer
Re: [Survey] Maintained builds - was Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 4/23/2010 8:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 4/23/2010 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: For those who are working on httpd trunk and Linux, what are you using? You raise interesting questions about what the httpd folks actually test on a day to day basis, given the dozen combinations of build approaches. Maintainers, which of the below do you *frequently* use during development against trunk (as opposed to occasional/infrequent testing)? [ ] ./configure and build entirely in-tree (httpd/srclib/* etc) [ ] ../httpd/configure into a single seperate vpath tree [ ] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned expat [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned pcre [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned apr[-util]
Re: [Survey] Maintained builds - was Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On Apr 25, 2010, at 12:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 4/23/2010 8:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 4/23/2010 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: For those who are working on httpd trunk and Linux, what are you using? You raise interesting questions about what the httpd folks actually test on a day to day basis, given the dozen combinations of build approaches. Maintainers, which of the below do you *frequently* use during development against trunk (as opposed to occasional/infrequent testing)? [X] ./configure and build entirely in-tree (httpd/srclib/* etc) [ ] ../httpd/configure into a single seperate vpath tree [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned expat [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned pcre [ ] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned apr[-util] The latter seems impossible for OS-provisioned apr, does it not?
Re: [Survey] Maintained builds - was Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On 4/26/2010 10:27 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Apr 25, 2010, at 12:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 4/23/2010 8:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 4/23/2010 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: For those who are working on httpd trunk and Linux, what are you using? You raise interesting questions about what the httpd folks actually test on a day to day basis, given the dozen combinations of build approaches. Maintainers, which of the below do you *frequently* use during development against trunk (as opposed to occasional/infrequent testing)? [X] ./configure and build entirely in-tree (httpd/srclib/* etc) [ ] ../httpd/configure into a single seperate vpath tree [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned expat [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned pcre [ ] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned apr[-util] The latter seems impossible for OS-provisioned apr, does it not? You mean, that apr 1.4 (not apr-util 1.4) is a prerequisite? Its true that few vendors are likely to be shipping apr 1.4.2 yet.
Re: [Survey] Maintained builds - was Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On Sunday 25 April 2010, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: [X] ./configure and build entirely in-tree (httpd/srclib/* etc) [ ] ../httpd/configure into a single seperate vpath tree [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned expat [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned pcre [ ] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned apr[-util] Cheers, Stefan
Re: [Survey] Maintained builds - was Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On 2010-04-25 at 12:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: You raise interesting questions about what the httpd folks actually test on a day to day basis, given the dozen combinations of build approaches. Maintainers, which of the below do you *frequently* use during development against trunk (as opposed to occasional/infrequent testing)? [ ] ./configure and build entirely in-tree (httpd/srclib/* etc) [ ] ../httpd/configure into a single seperate vpath tree [x] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned expat [x] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned pcre [x] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned apr[-util] Please check off all-of-the-above that apply, thanks!
[Survey] Maintained builds - was Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On 4/23/2010 8:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 4/23/2010 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: For those who are working on httpd trunk and Linux, what are you using? You raise interesting questions about what the httpd folks actually test on a day to day basis, given the dozen combinations of build approaches. Maintainers, which of the below do you *frequently* use during development against trunk (as opposed to occasional/infrequent testing)? [ ] ./configure and build entirely in-tree (httpd/srclib/* etc) [ ] ../httpd/configure into a single seperate vpath tree [ ] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned expat [ ] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned pcre [ ] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned apr[-util] Please check off all-of-the-above that apply, thanks!
Re: [Survey] Maintained builds - was Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
[ ] ./configure and build entirely in-tree (httpd/srclib/* etc) [X] ../httpd/configure into a single seperate vpath tree [X] configure for OS-provisioned expat [X] configure for OS-provisioned pcre [X] configure for separately built apr[-util]
Re: [Survey] Maintained builds - was Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On Apr 25, 2010, at 9:07 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Maintainers, which of the below do you *frequently* use during development against trunk (as opposed to occasional/infrequent testing)? [ ] ./configure and build entirely in-tree (httpd/srclib/* etc) [ ] ../httpd/configure into a single seperate vpath tree [√] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned expat [√] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned pcre [√] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned apr[-util] Please check off all-of-the-above that apply, thanks! My typical build on my laptop goes as follows: 1) svn up apr and apr-util 1.4.x and httpd 2) Put my own autotools build in front of my PATH (specifically for libtool 1.5.26) 3) Buildconf and build apr and apr-util in a directory keyed to their revision (like /tmp/r937654) 4) Buildconf httpd trunk and try to configure it 5) svn up pcre, buildconf, build and install it in the same prefix 6) Configure httpd with the following script: #! /bin/sh -x # # Created by configure prefix=$1 if [ x$prefix = x ]; then echo Usage: $0 install-prefix exit 1 fi CFLAGS=-DDEBUG -O0 -DDYNAMIC_MODULE_LIMIT=128; export CFLAGS ./configure \ --prefix=$prefix \ --with-apr=$prefix \ --with-apr-util=$prefix \ --with-pcre=$prefix \ --with-ssl=$prefix \ --with-port=8080 \ --enable-maintainer-mode \ --enable-so \ --with-layout=Apache \ --enable-modules=all \ --enable-mods-shared=all \ --enable-isapi=shared \ --enable-bucketeer=shared \ --enable-echo=shared \ --enable-example-hooks=shared \ --enable-case-filter=shared \ --enable-case-filter-in=shared \ --enable-example-ipc=shared \ --enable-charset-lite=shared \ --enable-proxy=shared \ --enable-proxy-connect=shared \ --enable-proxy-ftp=shared \ --enable-proxy-http=shared \ --enable-proxy-fcgi=shared \ --enable-proxy-ajp=shared \ --enable-proxy-balancer=shared \ --enable-ssl=shared \ --enable-optional-hook-export=shared \ --enable-optional-hook-import=shared \ --enable-optional-fn-import=shared \ --enable-optional-fn-export=shared \ --enable-dialup=shared \ --enable-suexec=shared \ --enable-dav-lock=shared Note that this can also pull in an included OpenSSL, but quietly falls back on the system copy if none have been installed under $prefix. I guess I could do this vpath, and I should be able to independently vary the httpd --prefix so I can build multiple httpds when experimenting. But this works. The module complement is what the perl-framework needs. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
(sorry for the cross-post but httpd-trunk and APR are now so entwined that its required)... OK... I've been playing around with building httpd-trunk on Linux and I've been having troubles left and right (using the 1.4 branches of both apr and apr-util installed right in ./srclib)... First of all, Ubuntu 8.10 can't even get past a top level ./buildconf (likely due to libtool issues (2.2.4)... But Ubuntu 9.10 dies when getting to build apr-util due to expat issues (can't find the system installed version and the bundled version's config/make is toast)... checking Expat 1.95.x... no checking old Debian-packaged expat... no checking old FreeBSD-packaged expat... no checking Expat 1.0/1.1... no setting LDFLAGS to -L/usr/local/lib adding -I/usr/local/include to CPPFLAGS checking Expat 1.95.x in /usr/local... no nulling LDFLAGS removed -I/usr/local/include from CPPFLAGS configuring package in xml/expat now checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu /home/jim/src/asf/code/dev/httpd-trunk/srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/configure: line 3321: syntax error near unexpected token `lt_decl_varnames,' /home/jim/src/asf/code/dev/httpd-trunk/srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/configure: line 3321: `lt_if_append_uniq(lt_decl_varnames, SED, , ,' configure failed for xml/expat For those who are working on httpd trunk and Linux, what are you using?
Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On 4/23/2010 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: For those who are working on httpd trunk and Linux, what are you using? Expat 2.0.1 or os vendor expat
Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: (sorry for the cross-post but httpd-trunk and APR are now so entwined that its required)... OK... I've been playing around with building httpd-trunk on Linux and I've been having troubles left and right (using the 1.4 branches of both apr and apr-util installed right in ./srclib)... First of all, Ubuntu 8.10 can't even get past a top level ./buildconf (likely due to libtool issues (2.2.4)... But Ubuntu 9.10 dies when getting to build apr-util due to expat issues (can't find the system installed version and the bundled version's config/make is toast)... Hmmm... my Ubuntu 9.10 x86 ./buildconf found apr source: srclib/apr found apr-util source: srclib/apr-util rebuilding srclib/apr/configure buildconf: checking installation... buildconf: python version 2.6.4 (ok) buildconf: autoconf version 2.64 (ok) buildconf: libtool version 1.5.26 (ok) ... /home/trawick/svn/httpd-trunk-full/configure --enable-maintainer-mode --prefix=/home/trawick/inst/23 --with-included-apr --with-ldap=ldap --enable-maintainer-mode --enable-nonportable-atomics --enable-VARIOUS-MODULES configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-ldap, --enable-nonportable-atomics checking Expat 1.95.x... no checking Expat 1.95.x... yes setting APRUTIL_EXPORT_LIBS to -lexpat setting APRUTIL_LIBS to -lexpat checking old Debian-packaged expat... no checking old FreeBSD-packaged expat... no checking Expat 1.0/1.1... no setting LDFLAGS to -L/usr/local/lib adding -I/usr/local/include to CPPFLAGS checking Expat 1.95.x in /usr/local... no nulling LDFLAGS removed -I/usr/local/include from CPPFLAGS configuring package in xml/expat now checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu /home/jim/src/asf/code/dev/httpd-trunk/srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/configure: line 3321: syntax error near unexpected token `lt_decl_varnames,' /home/jim/src/asf/code/dev/httpd-trunk/srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/configure: line 3321: `lt_if_append_uniq(lt_decl_varnames, SED, , ,' configure failed for xml/expat
Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On Apr 23, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: (sorry for the cross-post but httpd-trunk and APR are now so entwined that its required)... OK... I've been playing around with building httpd-trunk on Linux and I've been having troubles left and right (using the 1.4 branches of both apr and apr-util installed right in ./srclib)... First of all, Ubuntu 8.10 can't even get past a top level ./buildconf (likely due to libtool issues (2.2.4)... But Ubuntu 9.10 dies when getting to build apr-util due to expat issues (can't find the system installed version and the bundled version's config/make is toast)... Hmmm... my Ubuntu 9.10 x86 ./buildconf found apr source: srclib/apr found apr-util source: srclib/apr-util rebuilding srclib/apr/configure buildconf: checking installation... buildconf: python version 2.6.4 (ok) buildconf: autoconf version 2.64 (ok) buildconf: libtool version 1.5.26 (ok) Weird... my default libtool is 2.2.6 under 9.10... checking Expat 1.95.x... no checking Expat 1.95.x... yes setting APRUTIL_EXPORT_LIBS to -lexpat setting APRUTIL_LIBS to -lexpat So far, if I install libtool 2.2.6b, expat 2.0.1 and pcre 8.02 then I can get to at least a completed compile, both with Ubuntu 8.10 and 9.10.
Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Apr 23, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: (sorry for the cross-post but httpd-trunk and APR are now so entwined that its required)... OK... I've been playing around with building httpd-trunk on Linux and I've been having troubles left and right (using the 1.4 branches of both apr and apr-util installed right in ./srclib)... First of all, Ubuntu 8.10 can't even get past a top level ./buildconf (likely due to libtool issues (2.2.4)... But Ubuntu 9.10 dies when getting to build apr-util due to expat issues (can't find the system installed version and the bundled version's config/make is toast)... Hmmm... my Ubuntu 9.10 x86 ./buildconf found apr source: srclib/apr found apr-util source: srclib/apr-util rebuilding srclib/apr/configure buildconf: checking installation... buildconf: python version 2.6.4 (ok) buildconf: autoconf version 2.64 (ok) buildconf: libtool version 1.5.26 (ok) Weird... my default libtool is 2.2.6 under 9.10... Ahh, I have my own autoconf and libtool in /usr/local/bin. checking Expat 1.95.x... no checking Expat 1.95.x... yes setting APRUTIL_EXPORT_LIBS to -lexpat setting APRUTIL_LIBS to -lexpat So far, if I install libtool 2.2.6b, expat 2.0.1 and pcre 8.02 then I can get to at least a completed compile, both with Ubuntu 8.10 and 9.10.
Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
On Apr 23, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Apr 23, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: ./buildconf found apr source: srclib/apr found apr-util source: srclib/apr-util rebuilding srclib/apr/configure buildconf: checking installation... buildconf: python version 2.6.4 (ok) buildconf: autoconf version 2.64 (ok) buildconf: libtool version 1.5.26 (ok) Weird... my default libtool is 2.2.6 under 9.10... Ahh, I have my own autoconf and libtool in /usr/local/bin. Gotcha... 2.2.6b seems to work, but needs to be built by hand.
