Re: [DISCUSS] Support popular metrics reporter
Thank you all for the approval! Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-836 On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:40 PM dongdong hong wrote: > +1 > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Support popular metrics reporter
+1
Re: [DISCUSS] Support popular metrics reporter
+1 Balaji Varadarajan 于2020年4月23日周四 上午12:12写道: > +1 > On Wednesday, April 22, 2020, 08:35:30 AM PDT, leesf < > leesf0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > Vinoth Chandar 于2020年4月22日周三 下午2:24写道: > > > +1 from me as well > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 9:37 PM vino yang wrote: > > > > > Hi Raymond, > > > > > > Thanks for opening this discussion. > > > > > > IMHO, as Hudi's user base grows, we need to enhance our metrics > reporter. > > > From an ecological point of view, this is also very important. > > > > > > So, +1 from my side. > > > > > > Best, > > > Vino > > > > > > Shiyan Xu 于2020年4月21日周二 上午10:59写道: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I'd like raise the topic of supporting multiple metrics reporters. > > > > > > > > Currently hudi supports graphite and JMX. And there are 2 proposed > > > reporter > > > > types: CSV and Prometheus > > > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-210 > > > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-361 > > > > > > > > I think supporting multiple metrics backends gives Hudi competitive > > > > advantage on user expansion. It reduces the friction for different > > > > organizations to adopt Hudi. And we only need to support a few > popular > > > ones > > > > to achieve that. > > > > > > > > In terms of determining the list, as mentioned by @vinoyang, flink > has > > a > > > > nice list of supported ones: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.10/monitoring/metrics.html#reporter > > > > which can be used as a reference. > > > > > > > > From that list, I'd like to propose supporting Datadog as well, due > to > > > its > > > > popularity. May I get +1 on this? > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Raymond > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Support popular metrics reporter
+1 On Wednesday, April 22, 2020, 08:35:30 AM PDT, leesf wrote: +1 Vinoth Chandar 于2020年4月22日周三 下午2:24写道: > +1 from me as well > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 9:37 PM vino yang wrote: > > > Hi Raymond, > > > > Thanks for opening this discussion. > > > > IMHO, as Hudi's user base grows, we need to enhance our metrics reporter. > > From an ecological point of view, this is also very important. > > > > So, +1 from my side. > > > > Best, > > Vino > > > > Shiyan Xu 于2020年4月21日周二 上午10:59写道: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like raise the topic of supporting multiple metrics reporters. > > > > > > Currently hudi supports graphite and JMX. And there are 2 proposed > > reporter > > > types: CSV and Prometheus > > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-210 > > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-361 > > > > > > I think supporting multiple metrics backends gives Hudi competitive > > > advantage on user expansion. It reduces the friction for different > > > organizations to adopt Hudi. And we only need to support a few popular > > ones > > > to achieve that. > > > > > > In terms of determining the list, as mentioned by @vinoyang, flink has > a > > > nice list of supported ones: > > > > > > > > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.10/monitoring/metrics.html#reporter > > > which can be used as a reference. > > > > > > From that list, I'd like to propose supporting Datadog as well, due to > > its > > > popularity. May I get +1 on this? > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Raymond > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Support popular metrics reporter
+1 Vinoth Chandar 于2020年4月22日周三 下午2:24写道: > +1 from me as well > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 9:37 PM vino yang wrote: > > > Hi Raymond, > > > > Thanks for opening this discussion. > > > > IMHO, as Hudi's user base grows, we need to enhance our metrics reporter. > > From an ecological point of view, this is also very important. > > > > So, +1 from my side. > > > > Best, > > Vino > > > > Shiyan Xu 于2020年4月21日周二 上午10:59写道: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like raise the topic of supporting multiple metrics reporters. > > > > > > Currently hudi supports graphite and JMX. And there are 2 proposed > > reporter > > > types: CSV and Prometheus > > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-210 > > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-361 > > > > > > I think supporting multiple metrics backends gives Hudi competitive > > > advantage on user expansion. It reduces the friction for different > > > organizations to adopt Hudi. And we only need to support a few popular > > ones > > > to achieve that. > > > > > > In terms of determining the list, as mentioned by @vinoyang, flink has > a > > > nice list of supported ones: > > > > > > > > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.10/monitoring/metrics.html#reporter > > > which can be used as a reference. > > > > > > From that list, I'd like to propose supporting Datadog as well, due to > > its > > > popularity. May I get +1 on this? > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Raymond > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Support popular metrics reporter
+1 from me as well On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 9:37 PM vino yang wrote: > Hi Raymond, > > Thanks for opening this discussion. > > IMHO, as Hudi's user base grows, we need to enhance our metrics reporter. > From an ecological point of view, this is also very important. > > So, +1 from my side. > > Best, > Vino > > Shiyan Xu 于2020年4月21日周二 上午10:59写道: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like raise the topic of supporting multiple metrics reporters. > > > > Currently hudi supports graphite and JMX. And there are 2 proposed > reporter > > types: CSV and Prometheus > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-210 > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-361 > > > > I think supporting multiple metrics backends gives Hudi competitive > > advantage on user expansion. It reduces the friction for different > > organizations to adopt Hudi. And we only need to support a few popular > ones > > to achieve that. > > > > In terms of determining the list, as mentioned by @vinoyang, flink has a > > nice list of supported ones: > > > > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.10/monitoring/metrics.html#reporter > > which can be used as a reference. > > > > From that list, I'd like to propose supporting Datadog as well, due to > its > > popularity. May I get +1 on this? > > > > Thank you. > > > > Regards, > > Raymond > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Support popular metrics reporter
Hi Raymond, Thanks for opening this discussion. IMHO, as Hudi's user base grows, we need to enhance our metrics reporter. >From an ecological point of view, this is also very important. So, +1 from my side. Best, Vino Shiyan Xu 于2020年4月21日周二 上午10:59写道: > Hi all, > > I'd like raise the topic of supporting multiple metrics reporters. > > Currently hudi supports graphite and JMX. And there are 2 proposed reporter > types: CSV and Prometheus > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-210 > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-361 > > I think supporting multiple metrics backends gives Hudi competitive > advantage on user expansion. It reduces the friction for different > organizations to adopt Hudi. And we only need to support a few popular ones > to achieve that. > > In terms of determining the list, as mentioned by @vinoyang, flink has a > nice list of supported ones: > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.10/monitoring/metrics.html#reporter > which can be used as a reference. > > From that list, I'd like to propose supporting Datadog as well, due to its > popularity. May I get +1 on this? > > Thank you. > > Regards, > Raymond >
[DISCUSS] Support popular metrics reporter
Hi all, I'd like raise the topic of supporting multiple metrics reporters. Currently hudi supports graphite and JMX. And there are 2 proposed reporter types: CSV and Prometheus https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-210 https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-361 I think supporting multiple metrics backends gives Hudi competitive advantage on user expansion. It reduces the friction for different organizations to adopt Hudi. And we only need to support a few popular ones to achieve that. In terms of determining the list, as mentioned by @vinoyang, flink has a nice list of supported ones: https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.10/monitoring/metrics.html#reporter which can be used as a reference. >From that list, I'd like to propose supporting Datadog as well, due to its popularity. May I get +1 on this? Thank you. Regards, Raymond