Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Nikita Safonov]

P.S.

Forgot to attach the ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14932

Regards,
Nikita

чт, 15 июл. 2021 г. в 15:34, Nikita Safonov :

> Hey guys!
>
> Could you please also cherry pick the changes below to the 2.11
> documentation?
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9181
>
> Regards,
> Nikita
>
> пн, 5 июл. 2021 г. в 16:46, Nikita Safonov :
>
>> Hi guys!
>>
>> Alexey, I do confirm that some of the issues are already resolved (for
>> example, IGNITE-14658
>>  is already
>> documented).
>> What is more, some of the tickets seem to be minor or "very internal"
>> things that do not change the behaviour/are not accessible for users,
>> including tests' improvements.
>>
>> I would say that most of these tickets should be reflected only in the
>> Release notes, while some should even be omitted.
>>
>> Alexey, could you or someone else please look through these tickets once
>> again and say which of them are worth documenting?
>> Then I'll be able to give the approximate time estimates.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nikita
>>
>> пн, 5 июл. 2021 г. в 12:20, Alex Plehanov :
>>
>>> Alexey,
>>>
>>> Some of these tickets are already documented. Do we need to clear the
>>> "Docs
>>> Required" flag if documentation for the ticket has been merged to the
>>> master and release branch? AFAIK we didn't do that for previous releases.
>>>
>>> пн, 5 июл. 2021 г. в 13:53, Alexey Gidaspov :
>>>
>>> > Hi, Nikita!
>>> >
>>> > As I can see, these are the tickets we need to document [1]
>>> >
>>> > Can you tell me how long it will take to complete work on
>>> documentation?
>>> >
>>> > [1]
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20'Ignite'%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20('2.11')%20AND%20cf%5B12313620%5D%20%3D%20%22Docs%20Required%22
>>> >
>>> > On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov 
>>> wrote:
>>> > > Hello Igniters!
>>> > >
>>> > > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
>>> > > I'll be glad to help with this.
>>> > > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to
>>> document.
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > > Nikita
>>> > >
>>> > > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>:
>>> > >
>>> > > > hello,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
>>> > > >
>>> > > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a
>>> > > > valuable one.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
>>> > > > > Sure, thanks for your reply
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account
>>> integration
>>> > for
>>> > > > non-committers?
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > For the page
>>> > > > >
>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
>>> > > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not
>>> sufficient.
>>> > Can
>>> > > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his own?
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin 
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear
>>> there
>>> > are
>>> > > > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov <
>>> dpav...@apache.org>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a
>>> chance ))
>>> > > > >>>
>>> > > > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin <
>>> timonin.ma...@gmail.com>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
>>> > guess
>>> > > > if
>>> > > > >>> it
>>> > > >  is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
>>> > > > 
>>> > > >  Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release
>>> it
>>> > > > within
>>> > > > >>> the
>>> > > >  next release.
>>> > > > 
>>> > > >  On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov <
>>> dpav...@apache.org>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > > 
>>> > > > > Hi Alexey,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
>>> > guess
>>> > > > if
>>> > > > >>> it
>>> > > > > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big
>>> > deal,
>>> > > > but
>>> > > > > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki
>>> > page and
>>> > > > > create branch.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could
>>> you
>>> > > > please
>>> > > > > notify me in advance.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Sincerely,
>>> > > > > Dmitriy 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Nikita Safonov]

Hey guys!

Could you please also cherry pick the changes below to the 2.11
documentation?
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9181

Regards,
Nikita

пн, 5 июл. 2021 г. в 16:46, Nikita Safonov :

> Hi guys!
>
> Alexey, I do confirm that some of the issues are already resolved (for
> example, IGNITE-14658  is
> already documented).
> What is more, some of the tickets seem to be minor or "very internal"
> things that do not change the behaviour/are not accessible for users,
> including tests' improvements.
>
> I would say that most of these tickets should be reflected only in the
> Release notes, while some should even be omitted.
>
> Alexey, could you or someone else please look through these tickets once
> again and say which of them are worth documenting?
> Then I'll be able to give the approximate time estimates.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Regards,
> Nikita
>
> пн, 5 июл. 2021 г. в 12:20, Alex Plehanov :
>
>> Alexey,
>>
>> Some of these tickets are already documented. Do we need to clear the
>> "Docs
>> Required" flag if documentation for the ticket has been merged to the
>> master and release branch? AFAIK we didn't do that for previous releases.
>>
>> пн, 5 июл. 2021 г. в 13:53, Alexey Gidaspov :
>>
>> > Hi, Nikita!
>> >
>> > As I can see, these are the tickets we need to document [1]
>> >
>> > Can you tell me how long it will take to complete work on documentation?
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20'Ignite'%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20('2.11')%20AND%20cf%5B12313620%5D%20%3D%20%22Docs%20Required%22
>> >
>> > On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov 
>> wrote:
>> > > Hello Igniters!
>> > >
>> > > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
>> > > I'll be glad to help with this.
>> > > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to
>> document.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Nikita
>> > >
>> > > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>:
>> > >
>> > > > hello,
>> > > >
>> > > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
>> > > >
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
>> > > >
>> > > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a
>> > > > valuable one.
>> > > >
>> > > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
>> > > > > Sure, thanks for your reply
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account
>> integration
>> > for
>> > > > non-committers?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > For the page
>> > > > >
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
>> > > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not
>> sufficient.
>> > Can
>> > > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his own?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin 
>> > wrote:
>> > > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear
>> there
>> > are
>> > > > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov > >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a
>> chance ))
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin > >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
>> > guess
>> > > > if
>> > > > >>> it
>> > > >  is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
>> > > > 
>> > > >  Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release
>> it
>> > > > within
>> > > > >>> the
>> > > >  next release.
>> > > > 
>> > > >  On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov <
>> dpav...@apache.org>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > 
>> > > > > Hi Alexey,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
>> > guess
>> > > > if
>> > > > >>> it
>> > > > > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big
>> > deal,
>> > > > but
>> > > > > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki
>> > page and
>> > > > > create branch.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could
>> you
>> > > > please
>> > > > > notify me in advance.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Sincerely,
>> > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
>> > > > > olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >> :scope:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite
>> > 2.11
>> > > > > release
>> > > > >> Let's start discussion
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> [1]
>> 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Nikita Safonov]

Hi guys!

Alexey, I do confirm that some of the issues are already resolved (for
example, IGNITE-14658  is
already documented).
What is more, some of the tickets seem to be minor or "very internal"
things that do not change the behaviour/are not accessible for users,
including tests' improvements.

I would say that most of these tickets should be reflected only in the
Release notes, while some should even be omitted.

Alexey, could you or someone else please look through these tickets once
again and say which of them are worth documenting?
Then I'll be able to give the approximate time estimates.

Thank you!

Regards,
Nikita

пн, 5 июл. 2021 г. в 12:20, Alex Plehanov :

> Alexey,
>
> Some of these tickets are already documented. Do we need to clear the "Docs
> Required" flag if documentation for the ticket has been merged to the
> master and release branch? AFAIK we didn't do that for previous releases.
>
> пн, 5 июл. 2021 г. в 13:53, Alexey Gidaspov :
>
> > Hi, Nikita!
> >
> > As I can see, these are the tickets we need to document [1]
> >
> > Can you tell me how long it will take to complete work on documentation?
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20'Ignite'%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20('2.11')%20AND%20cf%5B12313620%5D%20%3D%20%22Docs%20Required%22
> >
> > On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov 
> wrote:
> > > Hello Igniters!
> > >
> > > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
> > > I'll be glad to help with this.
> > > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to
> document.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Nikita
> > >
> > > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>:
> > >
> > > > hello,
> > > >
> > > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
> > > >
> > > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a
> > > > valuable one.
> > > >
> > > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
> > > > > Sure, thanks for your reply
> > > > >
> > > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account
> integration
> > for
> > > > non-committers?
> > > > >
> > > > > For the page
> > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
> > > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not
> sufficient.
> > Can
> > > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his own?
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin 
> > wrote:
> > > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear there
> > are
> > > > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance
> ))
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
> > guess
> > > > if
> > > > >>> it
> > > >  is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > > > 
> > > >  Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it
> > > > within
> > > > >>> the
> > > >  next release.
> > > > 
> > > >  On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov <
> dpav...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hi Alexey,
> > > > >
> > > > > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
> > guess
> > > > if
> > > > >>> it
> > > > > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > > > >
> > > > > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big
> > deal,
> > > > but
> > > > > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki
> > page and
> > > > > create branch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you
> > > > please
> > > > > notify me in advance.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
> > > > > olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> :scope:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite
> > 2.11
> > > > > release
> > > > >> Let's start discussion
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > > > >> On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov 
> > wrote:
> > > > >>> Hi Alexey,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> :pmc to sign distribution:
> > 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Alex Plehanov]

Alexey,

Some of these tickets are already documented. Do we need to clear the "Docs
Required" flag if documentation for the ticket has been merged to the
master and release branch? AFAIK we didn't do that for previous releases.

пн, 5 июл. 2021 г. в 13:53, Alexey Gidaspov :

> Hi, Nikita!
>
> As I can see, these are the tickets we need to document [1]
>
> Can you tell me how long it will take to complete work on documentation?
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20'Ignite'%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20('2.11')%20AND%20cf%5B12313620%5D%20%3D%20%22Docs%20Required%22
>
> On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov  wrote:
> > Hello Igniters!
> >
> > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
> > I'll be glad to help with this.
> > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to document.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nikita
> >
> > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>:
> >
> > > hello,
> > >
> > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
> > >
> > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a
> > > valuable one.
> > >
> > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
> > > > Sure, thanks for your reply
> > > >
> > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account integration
> for
> > > non-committers?
> > > >
> > > > For the page
> > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
> > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not sufficient.
> Can
> > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his own?
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin 
> wrote:
> > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear there
> are
> > > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance ))
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin 
> > > wrote:
> > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
> guess
> > > if
> > > >>> it
> > >  is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > > 
> > >  Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it
> > > within
> > > >>> the
> > >  next release.
> > > 
> > >  On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi Alexey,
> > > >
> > > > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
> > > >
> > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
> guess
> > > if
> > > >>> it
> > > > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > > >
> > > > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big
> deal,
> > > but
> > > > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki
> page and
> > > > create branch.
> > > >
> > > > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you
> > > please
> > > > notify me in advance.
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
> > > > olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> :scope:
> > > >>
> > > >> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite
> 2.11
> > > > release
> > > >> Let's start discussion
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]
> > > >>>
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > > >> On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov 
> wrote:
> > > >>> Hi Alexey,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> :pmc to sign distribution:
> > > >>> Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of
> > > > activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If
> noone
> > > >>> else
> > > > want to help you here, I would.
> > > >>> :timeline:
> > > >>> And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> :scope:
> > > >>> I guess we can just pick up master current state and release
> it.
> > > >>> But
> > > > if someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular
> feature to
> > > >>> be
> > > > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build,
> please
> > > let
> > > >>> know.
> > > >>> Sincerely,
> > > >>> Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов  >
> > > > wrote:
> > >  Dear Ignite Community!
> > > 
> > >  I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also
> > > > suggest
> > >  myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan
> 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Alexey Gidaspov]

Hi, Nikita!

As I can see, these are the tickets we need to document [1]

Can you tell me how long it will take to complete work on documentation?

[1] 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20'Ignite'%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20('2.11')%20AND%20cf%5B12313620%5D%20%3D%20%22Docs%20Required%22

On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov  wrote: 
> Hello Igniters!
> 
> I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
> I'll be glad to help with this.
> And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to document.
> 
> Regards,
> Nikita
> 
> пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>:
> 
> > hello,
> >
> > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
> >
> > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a
> > valuable one.
> >
> > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
> > > Sure, thanks for your reply
> > >
> > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account integration for
> > non-committers?
> > >
> > > For the page
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
> > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not sufficient. Can
> > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his own?
> > >
> > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin  wrote:
> > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear there are
> > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
> > >>>
> > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance ))
> > >>>
> > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin 
> > wrote:
> > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess
> > if
> > >>> it
> >  is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > 
> >  Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it
> > within
> > >>> the
> >  next release.
> > 
> >  On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Alexey,
> > >
> > > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
> > >
> > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess
> > if
> > >>> it
> > > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > >
> > > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big deal,
> > but
> > > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki page and
> > > create branch.
> > >
> > > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you
> > please
> > > notify me in advance.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >
> > > On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
> > > olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> :scope:
> > >>
> > >> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite 2.11
> > > release
> > >> Let's start discussion
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > >> On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:
> > >>> Hi Alexey,
> > >>>
> > >>> :pmc to sign distribution:
> > >>> Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of
> > > activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone
> > >>> else
> > > want to help you here, I would.
> > >>> :timeline:
> > >>> And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> > >>>
> > >>> :scope:
> > >>> I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it.
> > >>> But
> > > if someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to
> > >>> be
> > > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please
> > let
> > >>> know.
> > >>> Sincerely,
> > >>> Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >>>
> > >>> On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов 
> > > wrote:
> >  Dear Ignite Community!
> > 
> >  I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also
> > > suggest
> >  myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release
> > >>> at
> > > the end
> >  of june 2021.
> > 
> >  ___
> > 
> >  Best Regards,
> >  Alexey Gidaspov
> > 
> >
> 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Nikita Safonov]

Guys, I've created the following ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15046

Please feel free to comment or edit it.

If there are no objections, I'll create a PR soon.

Regards,
Nikita

чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:54, Nikita Safonov :

> Ivan, thank you for the links!
>
> Well, I can still find the docs on Python Thin Client under the "Thin
> Сlients"->"Python Thin Client" in 2.10:
> https://ignite.apache.org/docs/2.10.0/thin-clients/python-thin-client
>
> So, I can replace the contents of  "Thin Сlients"->"Python Thin Client"
> page with a link to the
> https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ and
> a short note as follows:
> "To see the documentation on Python Thin Client, please click here[link to
> the readthedocs.io
> ].
> +
> And I can also change the link here
> 
>  (after
> "Ignite provides the following thin clients:", so that it would lead to the
> readthedocs.io
> 
>  too).
>
> Alex, my bad, I misread the first question and thought that all the docs
> on thin clients have been migrated to the readthedocs.io
> .
> The articles are absolutely OK :)
>
> Regards,
> Nikita
>
> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:44, Alex Plehanov :
>
>> Nikita,
>>
>> What's wrong with platform-specific thin-client articles? These articles
>> describe how to configure and use specific thin client implementation, why
>> should we remove them?
>>
>> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:06, Ivan Daschinsky :
>>
>>> Binary prorocol description should stand and improved (there are some
>>> mistakes in this article)
>>>
>>> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 16:05 Ivan Daschinsky :
>>>
>>> > https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
>>> >
>>> > AFAIK, thin clients have been already removed since 2.10
>>> >
>>> > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 15:57 Nikita Safonov :
>>> >
>>> >> Hi guys!
>>> >>
>>> >> Sorry, totally missed this email.
>>> >>
>>> >> I can do this right away.
>>> >>
>>> >> Just a couple of questions first:
>>> >>
>>> >> [1] On the website, under the Thin Clients tab, we have the following
>>> >> articles:
>>> >>
>>> >> Thin Clients
>>> >> Thin Clients Overview
>>> >> Java Thin Client
>>> >> .NET Thin Client
>>> >> C++ Thin Client
>>> >> Python Thin Client
>>> >> PHP Thin Client
>>> >> Node.js Thin Client
>>> >> Binary Client Protocol
>>> >>
>>> >> I do believe that the introduction ( "Thin Clients" - the first one)
>>> >> should
>>> >> remain, while we can remove the rest (by the way, what about Binary
>>> Client
>>> >> Protocol? Should it remain too?).
>>> >> What do you think about this?
>>> >>
>>> >> [2] Could you please indicate the place in the docs where the link to
>>> the
>>> >> actual readthedocs.io documentation is? I didn't manage to find it.
>>> >> If we don't have it, I would place it at the beginning of the Thin
>>> >> clients'
>>> >> introduction article.
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >> Nikita
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 09:36, Alexey Gidaspov :
>>> >>
>>> >> > Hi, Nikita!
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Your help with documentation is really needed. Can you describe how
>>> we
>>> >> can
>>> >> > start with it?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov 
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > > Hello Igniters!
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
>>> >> > > I'll be glad to help with this.
>>> >> > > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to
>>> >> document.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Regards,
>>> >> > > Nikita
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > > hello,
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it
>>> is a
>>> >> > > > valuable one.
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
>>> >> > > > > Sure, thanks for your reply
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account
>>> >> integration
>>> >> > for
>>> >> > > > non-committers?
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > For the page
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> >
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
>>> >> > > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not
>>> >> sufficient.
>>> >> > Can
>>> >> > > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his
>>> own?
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin <
>>> timonin.ma...@gmail.com>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> > > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear
>>> >> there
>>> >> > are
>>> >> > > > >> chances for 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Nikita Safonov]

Ivan, thank you for the links!

Well, I can still find the docs on Python Thin Client under the "Thin
Сlients"->"Python Thin Client" in 2.10:
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/2.10.0/thin-clients/python-thin-client

So, I can replace the contents of  "Thin Сlients"->"Python Thin Client"
page with a link to the
https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ and
a short note as follows:
"To see the documentation on Python Thin Client, please click here[link to
the readthedocs.io
].
+
And I can also change the link here

(after
"Ignite provides the following thin clients:", so that it would lead to the
readthedocs.io

 too).

Alex, my bad, I misread the first question and thought that all the docs on
thin clients have been migrated to the readthedocs.io
.
The articles are absolutely OK :)

Regards,
Nikita

чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:44, Alex Plehanov :

> Nikita,
>
> What's wrong with platform-specific thin-client articles? These articles
> describe how to configure and use specific thin client implementation, why
> should we remove them?
>
> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:06, Ivan Daschinsky :
>
>> Binary prorocol description should stand and improved (there are some
>> mistakes in this article)
>>
>> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 16:05 Ivan Daschinsky :
>>
>> > https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
>> >
>> > AFAIK, thin clients have been already removed since 2.10
>> >
>> > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 15:57 Nikita Safonov :
>> >
>> >> Hi guys!
>> >>
>> >> Sorry, totally missed this email.
>> >>
>> >> I can do this right away.
>> >>
>> >> Just a couple of questions first:
>> >>
>> >> [1] On the website, under the Thin Clients tab, we have the following
>> >> articles:
>> >>
>> >> Thin Clients
>> >> Thin Clients Overview
>> >> Java Thin Client
>> >> .NET Thin Client
>> >> C++ Thin Client
>> >> Python Thin Client
>> >> PHP Thin Client
>> >> Node.js Thin Client
>> >> Binary Client Protocol
>> >>
>> >> I do believe that the introduction ( "Thin Clients" - the first one)
>> >> should
>> >> remain, while we can remove the rest (by the way, what about Binary
>> Client
>> >> Protocol? Should it remain too?).
>> >> What do you think about this?
>> >>
>> >> [2] Could you please indicate the place in the docs where the link to
>> the
>> >> actual readthedocs.io documentation is? I didn't manage to find it.
>> >> If we don't have it, I would place it at the beginning of the Thin
>> >> clients'
>> >> introduction article.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Nikita
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 09:36, Alexey Gidaspov :
>> >>
>> >> > Hi, Nikita!
>> >> >
>> >> > Your help with documentation is really needed. Can you describe how
>> we
>> >> can
>> >> > start with it?
>> >> >
>> >> > On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov 
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > > Hello Igniters!
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
>> >> > > I'll be glad to help with this.
>> >> > > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to
>> >> document.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Regards,
>> >> > > Nikita
>> >> > >
>> >> > > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > hello,
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is
>> a
>> >> > > > valuable one.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
>> >> > > > > Sure, thanks for your reply
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account
>> >> integration
>> >> > for
>> >> > > > non-committers?
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > For the page
>> >> > > > >
>> >> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
>> >> > > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not
>> >> sufficient.
>> >> > Can
>> >> > > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his
>> own?
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin <
>> timonin.ma...@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear
>> >> there
>> >> > are
>> >> > > > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov <
>> dpav...@apache.org
>> >> >
>> >> > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > > > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> > > > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a
>> >> chance ))
>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> > > > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin <
>> 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Alex Plehanov]

Nikita,

What's wrong with platform-specific thin-client articles? These articles
describe how to configure and use specific thin client implementation, why
should we remove them?

чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:06, Ivan Daschinsky :

> Binary prorocol description should stand and improved (there are some
> mistakes in this article)
>
> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 16:05 Ivan Daschinsky :
>
> > https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
> >
> > AFAIK, thin clients have been already removed since 2.10
> >
> > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 15:57 Nikita Safonov :
> >
> >> Hi guys!
> >>
> >> Sorry, totally missed this email.
> >>
> >> I can do this right away.
> >>
> >> Just a couple of questions first:
> >>
> >> [1] On the website, under the Thin Clients tab, we have the following
> >> articles:
> >>
> >> Thin Clients
> >> Thin Clients Overview
> >> Java Thin Client
> >> .NET Thin Client
> >> C++ Thin Client
> >> Python Thin Client
> >> PHP Thin Client
> >> Node.js Thin Client
> >> Binary Client Protocol
> >>
> >> I do believe that the introduction ( "Thin Clients" - the first one)
> >> should
> >> remain, while we can remove the rest (by the way, what about Binary
> Client
> >> Protocol? Should it remain too?).
> >> What do you think about this?
> >>
> >> [2] Could you please indicate the place in the docs where the link to
> the
> >> actual readthedocs.io documentation is? I didn't manage to find it.
> >> If we don't have it, I would place it at the beginning of the Thin
> >> clients'
> >> introduction article.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Nikita
> >>
> >>
> >> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 09:36, Alexey Gidaspov :
> >>
> >> > Hi, Nikita!
> >> >
> >> > Your help with documentation is really needed. Can you describe how we
> >> can
> >> > start with it?
> >> >
> >> > On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov 
> >> wrote:
> >> > > Hello Igniters!
> >> > >
> >> > > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
> >> > > I'll be glad to help with this.
> >> > > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to
> >> document.
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Nikita
> >> > >
> >> > > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>:
> >> > >
> >> > > > hello,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a
> >> > > > valuable one.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
> >> > > > > Sure, thanks for your reply
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account
> >> integration
> >> > for
> >> > > > non-committers?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > For the page
> >> > > > >
> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
> >> > > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not
> >> sufficient.
> >> > Can
> >> > > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his
> own?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin  >
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear
> >> there
> >> > are
> >> > > > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov <
> dpav...@apache.org
> >> >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a
> >> chance ))
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin <
> timonin.ma...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness.
> I
> >> > guess
> >> > > > if
> >> > > > >>> it
> >> > > >  is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > >  Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release
> >> it
> >> > > > within
> >> > > > >>> the
> >> > > >  next release.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > >  On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov <
> >> dpav...@apache.org>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > > Hi Alexey,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness.
> I
> >> > guess
> >> > > > if
> >> > > > >>> it
> >> > > > > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a
> big
> >> > deal,
> >> > > > but
> >> > > > > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki
> >> > page and
> >> > > > > create branch.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could
> >> you
> >> > > > please
> >> > > > > notify me in advance.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Sincerely,
> >> > > > 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Ivan Daschinsky]

Binary prorocol description should stand and improved (there are some
mistakes in this article)

чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 16:05 Ivan Daschinsky :

> https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
>
> AFAIK, thin clients have been already removed since 2.10
>
> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 15:57 Nikita Safonov :
>
>> Hi guys!
>>
>> Sorry, totally missed this email.
>>
>> I can do this right away.
>>
>> Just a couple of questions first:
>>
>> [1] On the website, under the Thin Clients tab, we have the following
>> articles:
>>
>> Thin Clients
>> Thin Clients Overview
>> Java Thin Client
>> .NET Thin Client
>> C++ Thin Client
>> Python Thin Client
>> PHP Thin Client
>> Node.js Thin Client
>> Binary Client Protocol
>>
>> I do believe that the introduction ( "Thin Clients" - the first one)
>> should
>> remain, while we can remove the rest (by the way, what about Binary Client
>> Protocol? Should it remain too?).
>> What do you think about this?
>>
>> [2] Could you please indicate the place in the docs where the link to the
>> actual readthedocs.io documentation is? I didn't manage to find it.
>> If we don't have it, I would place it at the beginning of the Thin
>> clients'
>> introduction article.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nikita
>>
>>
>> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 09:36, Alexey Gidaspov :
>>
>> > Hi, Nikita!
>> >
>> > Your help with documentation is really needed. Can you describe how we
>> can
>> > start with it?
>> >
>> > On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov 
>> wrote:
>> > > Hello Igniters!
>> > >
>> > > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
>> > > I'll be glad to help with this.
>> > > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to
>> document.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Nikita
>> > >
>> > > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>:
>> > >
>> > > > hello,
>> > > >
>> > > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
>> > > >
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
>> > > >
>> > > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a
>> > > > valuable one.
>> > > >
>> > > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
>> > > > > Sure, thanks for your reply
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account
>> integration
>> > for
>> > > > non-committers?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > For the page
>> > > > >
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
>> > > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not
>> sufficient.
>> > Can
>> > > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his own?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin 
>> > wrote:
>> > > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear
>> there
>> > are
>> > > > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov > >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a
>> chance ))
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin > >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
>> > guess
>> > > > if
>> > > > >>> it
>> > > >  is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
>> > > > 
>> > > >  Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release
>> it
>> > > > within
>> > > > >>> the
>> > > >  next release.
>> > > > 
>> > > >  On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov <
>> dpav...@apache.org>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > 
>> > > > > Hi Alexey,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
>> > guess
>> > > > if
>> > > > >>> it
>> > > > > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big
>> > deal,
>> > > > but
>> > > > > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki
>> > page and
>> > > > > create branch.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could
>> you
>> > > > please
>> > > > > notify me in advance.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Sincerely,
>> > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
>> > > > > olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >> :scope:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite
>> > 2.11
>> > > > > release
>> > > > >> Let's start discussion
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> [1]
>> > > > >>>
>> > > >
>> >
>> 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Ivan Daschinsky]

https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/

AFAIK, thin clients have been already removed since 2.10

чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 15:57 Nikita Safonov :

> Hi guys!
>
> Sorry, totally missed this email.
>
> I can do this right away.
>
> Just a couple of questions first:
>
> [1] On the website, under the Thin Clients tab, we have the following
> articles:
>
> Thin Clients
> Thin Clients Overview
> Java Thin Client
> .NET Thin Client
> C++ Thin Client
> Python Thin Client
> PHP Thin Client
> Node.js Thin Client
> Binary Client Protocol
>
> I do believe that the introduction ( "Thin Clients" - the first one) should
> remain, while we can remove the rest (by the way, what about Binary Client
> Protocol? Should it remain too?).
> What do you think about this?
>
> [2] Could you please indicate the place in the docs where the link to the
> actual readthedocs.io documentation is? I didn't manage to find it.
> If we don't have it, I would place it at the beginning of the Thin clients'
> introduction article.
>
> Regards,
> Nikita
>
>
> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 09:36, Alexey Gidaspov :
>
> > Hi, Nikita!
> >
> > Your help with documentation is really needed. Can you describe how we
> can
> > start with it?
> >
> > On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov 
> wrote:
> > > Hello Igniters!
> > >
> > > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
> > > I'll be glad to help with this.
> > > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to
> document.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Nikita
> > >
> > > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>:
> > >
> > > > hello,
> > > >
> > > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
> > > >
> > > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a
> > > > valuable one.
> > > >
> > > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
> > > > > Sure, thanks for your reply
> > > > >
> > > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account
> integration
> > for
> > > > non-committers?
> > > > >
> > > > > For the page
> > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
> > > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not
> sufficient.
> > Can
> > > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his own?
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin 
> > wrote:
> > > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear there
> > are
> > > > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance
> ))
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
> > guess
> > > > if
> > > > >>> it
> > > >  is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > > > 
> > > >  Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it
> > > > within
> > > > >>> the
> > > >  next release.
> > > > 
> > > >  On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov <
> dpav...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hi Alexey,
> > > > >
> > > > > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
> > guess
> > > > if
> > > > >>> it
> > > > > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > > > >
> > > > > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big
> > deal,
> > > > but
> > > > > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki
> > page and
> > > > > create branch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you
> > > > please
> > > > > notify me in advance.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
> > > > > olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> :scope:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite
> > 2.11
> > > > > release
> > > > >> Let's start discussion
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > > > >> On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov 
> > wrote:
> > > > >>> Hi Alexey,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> :pmc to sign distribution:
> > > > >>> Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part
> of
> > > > > activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If
> > noone
> > 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Nikita Safonov]

Hi guys!

Sorry, totally missed this email.

I can do this right away.

Just a couple of questions first:

[1] On the website, under the Thin Clients tab, we have the following
articles:

Thin Clients
Thin Clients Overview
Java Thin Client
.NET Thin Client
C++ Thin Client
Python Thin Client
PHP Thin Client
Node.js Thin Client
Binary Client Protocol

I do believe that the introduction ( "Thin Clients" - the first one) should
remain, while we can remove the rest (by the way, what about Binary Client
Protocol? Should it remain too?).
What do you think about this?

[2] Could you please indicate the place in the docs where the link to the
actual readthedocs.io documentation is? I didn't manage to find it.
If we don't have it, I would place it at the beginning of the Thin clients'
introduction article.

Regards,
Nikita


ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 09:36, Alexey Gidaspov :

> Hi, Nikita!
>
> Your help with documentation is really needed. Can you describe how we can
> start with it?
>
> On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov  wrote:
> > Hello Igniters!
> >
> > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
> > I'll be glad to help with this.
> > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to document.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nikita
> >
> > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>:
> >
> > > hello,
> > >
> > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
> > >
> > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a
> > > valuable one.
> > >
> > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
> > > > Sure, thanks for your reply
> > > >
> > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account integration
> for
> > > non-committers?
> > > >
> > > > For the page
> > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
> > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not sufficient.
> Can
> > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his own?
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin 
> wrote:
> > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear there
> are
> > > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance ))
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin 
> > > wrote:
> > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
> guess
> > > if
> > > >>> it
> > >  is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > > 
> > >  Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it
> > > within
> > > >>> the
> > >  next release.
> > > 
> > >  On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi Alexey,
> > > >
> > > > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
> > > >
> > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
> guess
> > > if
> > > >>> it
> > > > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > > >
> > > > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big
> deal,
> > > but
> > > > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki
> page and
> > > > create branch.
> > > >
> > > > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you
> > > please
> > > > notify me in advance.
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
> > > > olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> :scope:
> > > >>
> > > >> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite
> 2.11
> > > > release
> > > >> Let's start discussion
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]
> > > >>>
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > > >> On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov 
> wrote:
> > > >>> Hi Alexey,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> :pmc to sign distribution:
> > > >>> Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of
> > > > activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If
> noone
> > > >>> else
> > > > want to help you here, I would.
> > > >>> :timeline:
> > > >>> And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> :scope:
> > > >>> I guess we can just pick up master current state and release
> it.
> > > >>> But
> > > > if someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular
> feature to
> > > >>> be
> > > > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build,
> please
> > > let
> > > >>> know.
> > > >>> Sincerely,

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Alexey Gidaspov]

Hi, Nikita!

Your help with documentation is really needed. Can you describe how we can 
start with it?

On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov  wrote: 
> Hello Igniters!
> 
> I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
> I'll be glad to help with this.
> And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to document.
> 
> Regards,
> Nikita
> 
> пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>:
> 
> > hello,
> >
> > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
> >
> > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a
> > valuable one.
> >
> > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
> > > Sure, thanks for your reply
> > >
> > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account integration for
> > non-committers?
> > >
> > > For the page
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
> > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not sufficient. Can
> > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his own?
> > >
> > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin  wrote:
> > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear there are
> > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
> > >>>
> > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance ))
> > >>>
> > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin 
> > wrote:
> > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess
> > if
> > >>> it
> >  is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > 
> >  Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it
> > within
> > >>> the
> >  next release.
> > 
> >  On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Alexey,
> > >
> > > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
> > >
> > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess
> > if
> > >>> it
> > > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > >
> > > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big deal,
> > but
> > > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki page and
> > > create branch.
> > >
> > > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you
> > please
> > > notify me in advance.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >
> > > On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
> > > olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> :scope:
> > >>
> > >> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite 2.11
> > > release
> > >> Let's start discussion
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > >> On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:
> > >>> Hi Alexey,
> > >>>
> > >>> :pmc to sign distribution:
> > >>> Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of
> > > activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone
> > >>> else
> > > want to help you here, I would.
> > >>> :timeline:
> > >>> And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> > >>>
> > >>> :scope:
> > >>> I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it.
> > >>> But
> > > if someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to
> > >>> be
> > > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please
> > let
> > >>> know.
> > >>> Sincerely,
> > >>> Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >>>
> > >>> On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов 
> > > wrote:
> >  Dear Ignite Community!
> > 
> >  I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also
> > > suggest
> >  myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release
> > >>> at
> > > the end
> >  of june 2021.
> > 
> >  ___
> > 
> >  Best Regards,
> >  Alexey Gidaspov
> > 
> >
> 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Ivan Daschinsky]

I suppose that python thin client documentation should be removed, only
link to actual readthedocs.io documentation should remain

пт, 11 июн. 2021 г., 14:01 Игорь Гусев :

>
> Hello all.
>
> I’d also join in on Nikita’s question n what docs are required for
> release. Currently we only have one doc issue for over 200 tickets resolved
> in the released, and it looks like we might be missing something.
>
>
> >Hello Igniters!
> >
> >I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
> >I'll be glad to help with this.
> >And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to document.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Nikita
> >пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 < 18624049...@163.com >:
> >>hello,
> >>
> >>can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
> >>
> >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
> >>
> >>This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a
> >>valuable one.
> >>
> >>在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
> >>> Sure, thanks for your reply
> >>>
> >>> Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account integration
> for non-committers?
> >>>
> >>> For the page
> >>>  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
> >>> I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not sufficient.
> Can wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his own?
> >>>
> >>> On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin < timonin.ma...@gmail.com >
> wrote:
>  I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear there are
>  chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
> 
> 
>  On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov < dpav...@apache.org >
> wrote:
> 
> > ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
> >
> > We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance ))
> >
> > On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin < timonin.ma...@gmail.com >
> wrote:
> >>> Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
> guess if
> > it
> >> is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> >>
> >> Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it
> within
> > the
> >> next release.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov < dpav...@apache.org
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Alexey,
> >>>
> >>> Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
> >>>
> >>> Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I
> guess if
> > it
> >>> is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> >>>
> >>> We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big
> deal, but
> >>> still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki page
> and
> >>> create branch.
> >>>
> >>> Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you
> please
> >>> notify me in advance.
> >>>
> >>> Sincerely,
> >>> Dmitriy Pavlov
> >>>
> >>> On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, <
> >>>  olive.c...@gmail.com > wrote:
>  :scope:
> 
>  Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite 2.11
> >>> release
>  Let's start discussion
> 
>  [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
>  On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov < dpav...@apache.org >
> wrote:
> > Hi Alexey,
> >
> > :pmc to sign distribution:
> > Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of
> >>> activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If
> noone
> > else
> >>> want to help you here, I would.
> > :timeline:
> > And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> >
> > :scope:
> > I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it.
> > But
> >>> if someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature
> to
> > be
> >>> completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please
> let
> > know.
> > Sincerely,
> > Dmitriy Pavlov
> >
> > On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов < olive.c...@gmail.com
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >> Dear Ignite Community!
> >>
> >> I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also
> >>> suggest
> >> myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release
> > at
> >>> the end
> >> of june 2021.
> >>
> >> ___
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Alexey Gidaspov
> >>
>
>
> --
> Igor Gusev
>

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Nikita Safonov]

Hello Igniters!

I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
I'll be glad to help with this.
And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to document.

Regards,
Nikita

пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>:

> hello,
>
> can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
>
> This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a
> valuable one.
>
> 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
> > Sure, thanks for your reply
> >
> > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account integration for
> non-committers?
> >
> > For the page
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
> > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not sufficient. Can
> wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his own?
> >
> > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin  wrote:
> >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear there are
> >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
> >>>
> >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance ))
> >>>
> >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin 
> wrote:
> > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess
> if
> >>> it
>  is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> 
>  Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it
> within
> >>> the
>  next release.
> 
>  On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Alexey,
> >
> > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
> >
> > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess
> if
> >>> it
> > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> >
> > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big deal,
> but
> > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki page and
> > create branch.
> >
> > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you
> please
> > notify me in advance.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Dmitriy Pavlov
> >
> > On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
> > olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> :scope:
> >>
> >> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite 2.11
> > release
> >> Let's start discussion
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> >> On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:
> >>> Hi Alexey,
> >>>
> >>> :pmc to sign distribution:
> >>> Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of
> > activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone
> >>> else
> > want to help you here, I would.
> >>> :timeline:
> >>> And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> >>>
> >>> :scope:
> >>> I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it.
> >>> But
> > if someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to
> >>> be
> > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please
> let
> >>> know.
> >>> Sincerely,
> >>> Dmitriy Pavlov
> >>>
> >>> On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов 
> > wrote:
>  Dear Ignite Community!
> 
>  I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also
> > suggest
>  myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release
> >>> at
> > the end
>  of june 2021.
> 
>  ___
> 
>  Best Regards,
>  Alexey Gidaspov
> 
>

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[18624049226]

hello,

can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852

This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a 
valuable one.


在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:

Sure, thanks for your reply

Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account integration for 
non-committers?

For the page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not sufficient. Can wiki 
admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his own?

On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin  wrote:

I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear there are
chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.


On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:


ok, Maksim, keep us posted.

We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance ))

On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin  wrote:

Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if

it

is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.

Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it within

the

next release.

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:


Hi Alexey,

Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.

Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if

it

is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.

We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big deal, but
still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki page and
create branch.

Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you please
notify me in advance.

Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov

On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:

:scope:

Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite 2.11

release

Let's start discussion

[1]

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC

On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:

Hi Alexey,

:pmc to sign distribution:
Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of

activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone

else

want to help you here, I would.

:timeline:
And, could you estimate all phases of the release.

:scope:
I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it.

But

if someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to

be

completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please let

know.

Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov

On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов 

wrote:

Dear Ignite Community!

I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also

suggest

myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release

at

the end

of june 2021.

___

Best Regards,
Alexey Gidaspov

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Dmitry Pavlov]

Sure, thanks for your reply

Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account integration for 
non-committers?

For the page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not sufficient. Can wiki 
admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his own?

On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin  wrote: 
> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear there are
> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:
> 
> > ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
> >
> > We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance ))
> >
> > On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin  wrote:
> > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if
> > it
> > > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > >
> > > Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it within
> > the
> > > next release.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Alexey,
> > > >
> > > > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
> > > >
> > > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if
> > it
> > > > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > > >
> > > > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big deal, but
> > > > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki page and
> > > > create branch.
> > > >
> > > > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you please
> > > > notify me in advance.
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
> > > > olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > :scope:
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite 2.11
> > > > release
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's start discussion
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Alexey,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > :pmc to sign distribution:
> > > > > > Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of
> > > > activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone
> > else
> > > > want to help you here, I would.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > :timeline:
> > > > > > And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > :scope:
> > > > > > I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it.
> > But
> > > > if someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to
> > be
> > > > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please let
> > know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Dear Ignite Community!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also
> > > > suggest
> > > > > > > myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release
> > at
> > > > the end
> > > > > > > of june 2021.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ___
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > Alexey Gidaspov
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Maksim Timonin]

I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear there are
chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.


On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:

> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
>
> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance ))
>
> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin  wrote:
> > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if
> it
> > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> >
> > Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it within
> the
> > next release.
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alexey,
> > >
> > > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
> > >
> > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if
> it
> > > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> > >
> > > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big deal, but
> > > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki page and
> > > create branch.
> > >
> > > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you please
> > > notify me in advance.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >
> > > On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
> > > olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > :scope:
> > > >
> > > > Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite 2.11
> > > release
> > > >
> > > > Let's start discussion
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:
> > > > > Hi Alexey,
> > > > >
> > > > > :pmc to sign distribution:
> > > > > Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of
> > > activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone
> else
> > > want to help you here, I would.
> > > > >
> > > > > :timeline:
> > > > > And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> > > > >
> > > > > :scope:
> > > > > I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it.
> But
> > > if someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to
> be
> > > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please let
> know.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > Dear Ignite Community!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also
> > > suggest
> > > > > > myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release
> at
> > > the end
> > > > > > of june 2021.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ___
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > Alexey Gidaspov
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Dmitry Pavlov]

ok, Maksim, keep us posted.

We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance ))

On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin  wrote: 
> > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if it
> is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> 
> Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it within the
> next release.
> 
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:
> 
> > Hi Alexey,
> >
> > Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
> >
> > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if it
> > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
> >
> > We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big deal, but
> > still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki page and
> > create branch.
> >
> > Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you please
> > notify me in advance.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Dmitriy Pavlov
> >
> > On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
> > olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > :scope:
> > >
> > > Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite 2.11
> > release
> > >
> > > Let's start discussion
> > >
> > > [1]
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > >
> > > On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:
> > > > Hi Alexey,
> > > >
> > > > :pmc to sign distribution:
> > > > Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of
> > activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone else
> > want to help you here, I would.
> > > >
> > > > :timeline:
> > > > And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> > > >
> > > > :scope:
> > > > I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it. But
> > if someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to be
> > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please let know.
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов 
> > wrote:
> > > > > Dear Ignite Community!
> > > > >
> > > > > I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also
> > suggest
> > > > > myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release at
> > the end
> > > > > of june 2021.
> > > > >
> > > > > ___
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Alexey Gidaspov
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Maksim Timonin]

> Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if it
is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.

Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it within the
next release.

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:

> Hi Alexey,
>
> Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
>
> Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if it
> is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.
>
> We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big deal, but
> still makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki page and
> create branch.
>
> Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you please
> notify me in advance.
>
> Sincerely,
> Dmitriy Pavlov
>
> On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��  <
> olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > :scope:
> >
> > Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite 2.11
> release
> >
> > Let's start discussion
> >
> > [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> >
> > On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:
> > > Hi Alexey,
> > >
> > > :pmc to sign distribution:
> > > Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of
> activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone else
> want to help you here, I would.
> > >
> > > :timeline:
> > > And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> > >
> > > :scope:
> > > I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it. But
> if someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to be
> completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please let know.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >
> > > On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов 
> wrote:
> > > > Dear Ignite Community!
> > > >
> > > > I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also
> suggest
> > > > myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release at
> the end
> > > > of june 2021.
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Alexey Gidaspov
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Dmitry Pavlov]

Hi Alexey,

Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.

Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if it is 
not in the master, we can skip and release it next time.

We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big deal, but still 
makes sense to start discussion, create and share wiki page and create branch.

Since committer privileges required to create branch, could you please notify 
me in advance.

Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov

On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��   
wrote: 
> :scope:
> 
> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite 2.11 release
> 
> Let's start discussion
> 
> [1] 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> 
> On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov  wrote: 
> > Hi Alexey,
> > 
> > :pmc to sign distribution:
> > Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of activities 
> > should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone else want to help 
> > you here, I would.
> > 
> > :timeline:
> > And, could you estimate all phases of the release. 
> > 
> > :scope:
> > I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it. But if 
> > someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to be 
> > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please let know.
> > 
> > Sincerely,
> > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > 
> > On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов  wrote: 
> > > Dear Ignite Community!
> > > 
> > > I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also suggest
> > > myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release at the end
> > > of june 2021.
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > 
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Alexey Gidaspov
> > > 
> > 
> 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Алексей Гидаспов]

:scope:

Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite 2.11 release

Let's start discussion

[1] 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC

On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov  wrote: 
> Hi Alexey,
> 
> :pmc to sign distribution:
> Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of activities 
> should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone else want to help 
> you here, I would.
> 
> :timeline:
> And, could you estimate all phases of the release. 
> 
> :scope:
> I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it. But if 
> someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to be 
> completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please let know.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Dmitriy Pavlov
> 
> On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов  wrote: 
> > Dear Ignite Community!
> > 
> > I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also suggest
> > myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release at the end
> > of june 2021.
> > 
> > ___
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Alexey Gidaspov
> > 
> 

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Maksim Timonin]

Hi, Ilya!

I've picked it.

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 7:04 PM Ilya Kasnacheev 
wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I have found a blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> пт, 21 мая 2021 г. в 15:30, Maksim Timonin :
>
> > Hi, Andrey!
> >
> > Phase 1 delivers complete query functionality. So users will get the API
> to
> > query indexes and can start to use it. This functionality is not supposed
> > to be changed in the next phases. I think there could be changes in the
> > internal part that can affect performance of queries in next steps, but
> API
> > will not change.
> >
> > Phases 2 and 3 are improvements and provide additional API. Those
> features
> > should be discussed on the dev list later. On this dev list topic [1] we
> > discussed phase 1 only and agreed that it is a useful feature.
> >
> > I'll prepare a PR for this feature today, and then up this topic [1].
> > Actually there are some issues to discuss. So after discussing those
> issues
> > we can decide to deliver the feature to 2.11 or postpone until 2.12.
> > Currently it's some time until the scope freeze (31 of May), so I'll
> write
> > to this topic about progress and decisions.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-IEP-71-Public-API-for-secondary-index-search-td52177.html
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 2:39 PM Andrey Gura  wrote:
> >
> > > Maksim,
> > >
> > > why do you want to include just one phase of functionality into
> > > release instead of full implementation? History of Ignie development
> > > shows (at least from my point of view) that it is bad practice. As
> > > result users will have unfinished and badly tested functionality. We
> > > have (or had in the past) some examples of such things: MVCC, IEP-35,
> > > etc.
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:11 PM Алексей Гидаспов  >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi, Dmitriy!
> > > >
> > > > I suggest this timeline
> > > >
> > > > Scope Freeze: May 31, 2021
> > > > Code Freeze: 14 June, 2021
> > > > Voting Date: 21 June, 2021
> > > > Release Date: 28 June, 2021
> > > >
> > > > пт, 14 мая 2021 г. в 11:32, Maksim Timonin  >:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, I'd like to include Phase 1 of index queries feature [1] to the
> > > next AI
> > > > > release. Currently there are 2 tickets in progress ([2], [3]), and
> > they
> > > > > will be ready for review next week. What is a time of code freeze
> if
> > > it's
> > > > > going to release AI 2.11 at the end of June?
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-71%3A+Public+API+for+secondary+index+search
> > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14699
> > > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14703
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 5:27 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Alexey,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > :pmc to sign distribution:
> > > > > > Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of
> > > activities
> > > > > > should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone else
> want
> > > to
> > > > > help
> > > > > > you here, I would.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > :timeline:
> > > > > > And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > :scope:
> > > > > > I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it.
> > But
> > > if
> > > > > > someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature
> to
> > be
> > > > > > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build,
> please
> > > let
> > > > > know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Dear Ignite Community!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also
> > > suggest
> > > > > > > myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release
> > at
> > > the
> > > > > > end
> > > > > > > of june 2021.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ___
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > Alexey Gidaspov
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Ilya Kasnacheev]

Hello!

I have found a blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781

Regards,
-- 
Ilya Kasnacheev


пт, 21 мая 2021 г. в 15:30, Maksim Timonin :

> Hi, Andrey!
>
> Phase 1 delivers complete query functionality. So users will get the API to
> query indexes and can start to use it. This functionality is not supposed
> to be changed in the next phases. I think there could be changes in the
> internal part that can affect performance of queries in next steps, but API
> will not change.
>
> Phases 2 and 3 are improvements and provide additional API. Those features
> should be discussed on the dev list later. On this dev list topic [1] we
> discussed phase 1 only and agreed that it is a useful feature.
>
> I'll prepare a PR for this feature today, and then up this topic [1].
> Actually there are some issues to discuss. So after discussing those issues
> we can decide to deliver the feature to 2.11 or postpone until 2.12.
> Currently it's some time until the scope freeze (31 of May), so I'll write
> to this topic about progress and decisions.
>
> [1]
>
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-IEP-71-Public-API-for-secondary-index-search-td52177.html
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 2:39 PM Andrey Gura  wrote:
>
> > Maksim,
> >
> > why do you want to include just one phase of functionality into
> > release instead of full implementation? History of Ignie development
> > shows (at least from my point of view) that it is bad practice. As
> > result users will have unfinished and badly tested functionality. We
> > have (or had in the past) some examples of such things: MVCC, IEP-35,
> > etc.
> >
> > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:11 PM Алексей Гидаспов 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, Dmitriy!
> > >
> > > I suggest this timeline
> > >
> > > Scope Freeze: May 31, 2021
> > > Code Freeze: 14 June, 2021
> > > Voting Date: 21 June, 2021
> > > Release Date: 28 June, 2021
> > >
> > > пт, 14 мая 2021 г. в 11:32, Maksim Timonin :
> > >
> > > > Hi, I'd like to include Phase 1 of index queries feature [1] to the
> > next AI
> > > > release. Currently there are 2 tickets in progress ([2], [3]), and
> they
> > > > will be ready for review next week. What is a time of code freeze if
> > it's
> > > > going to release AI 2.11 at the end of June?
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-71%3A+Public+API+for+secondary+index+search
> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14699
> > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14703
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 5:27 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Alexey,
> > > > >
> > > > > :pmc to sign distribution:
> > > > > Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of
> > activities
> > > > > should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone else want
> > to
> > > > help
> > > > > you here, I would.
> > > > >
> > > > > :timeline:
> > > > > And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> > > > >
> > > > > :scope:
> > > > > I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it.
> But
> > if
> > > > > someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to
> be
> > > > > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please
> > let
> > > > know.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов 
> > wrote:
> > > > > > Dear Ignite Community!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also
> > suggest
> > > > > > myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release
> at
> > the
> > > > > end
> > > > > > of june 2021.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ___
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > Alexey Gidaspov
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Maksim Timonin]

Hi, Andrey!

Phase 1 delivers complete query functionality. So users will get the API to
query indexes and can start to use it. This functionality is not supposed
to be changed in the next phases. I think there could be changes in the
internal part that can affect performance of queries in next steps, but API
will not change.

Phases 2 and 3 are improvements and provide additional API. Those features
should be discussed on the dev list later. On this dev list topic [1] we
discussed phase 1 only and agreed that it is a useful feature.

I'll prepare a PR for this feature today, and then up this topic [1].
Actually there are some issues to discuss. So after discussing those issues
we can decide to deliver the feature to 2.11 or postpone until 2.12.
Currently it's some time until the scope freeze (31 of May), so I'll write
to this topic about progress and decisions.

[1]
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-IEP-71-Public-API-for-secondary-index-search-td52177.html



On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 2:39 PM Andrey Gura  wrote:

> Maksim,
>
> why do you want to include just one phase of functionality into
> release instead of full implementation? History of Ignie development
> shows (at least from my point of view) that it is bad practice. As
> result users will have unfinished and badly tested functionality. We
> have (or had in the past) some examples of such things: MVCC, IEP-35,
> etc.
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:11 PM Алексей Гидаспов 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Dmitriy!
> >
> > I suggest this timeline
> >
> > Scope Freeze: May 31, 2021
> > Code Freeze: 14 June, 2021
> > Voting Date: 21 June, 2021
> > Release Date: 28 June, 2021
> >
> > пт, 14 мая 2021 г. в 11:32, Maksim Timonin :
> >
> > > Hi, I'd like to include Phase 1 of index queries feature [1] to the
> next AI
> > > release. Currently there are 2 tickets in progress ([2], [3]), and they
> > > will be ready for review next week. What is a time of code freeze if
> it's
> > > going to release AI 2.11 at the end of June?
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-71%3A+Public+API+for+secondary+index+search
> > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14699
> > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14703
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 5:27 PM Dmitry Pavlov 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Alexey,
> > > >
> > > > :pmc to sign distribution:
> > > > Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of
> activities
> > > > should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone else want
> to
> > > help
> > > > you here, I would.
> > > >
> > > > :timeline:
> > > > And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> > > >
> > > > :scope:
> > > > I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it. But
> if
> > > > someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to be
> > > > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please
> let
> > > know.
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов 
> wrote:
> > > > > Dear Ignite Community!
> > > > >
> > > > > I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also
> suggest
> > > > > myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release at
> the
> > > > end
> > > > > of june 2021.
> > > > >
> > > > > ___
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Alexey Gidaspov
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Andrey Gura]

Maksim,

why do you want to include just one phase of functionality into
release instead of full implementation? History of Ignie development
shows (at least from my point of view) that it is bad practice. As
result users will have unfinished and badly tested functionality. We
have (or had in the past) some examples of such things: MVCC, IEP-35,
etc.

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:11 PM Алексей Гидаспов  wrote:
>
> Hi, Dmitriy!
>
> I suggest this timeline
>
> Scope Freeze: May 31, 2021
> Code Freeze: 14 June, 2021
> Voting Date: 21 June, 2021
> Release Date: 28 June, 2021
>
> пт, 14 мая 2021 г. в 11:32, Maksim Timonin :
>
> > Hi, I'd like to include Phase 1 of index queries feature [1] to the next AI
> > release. Currently there are 2 tickets in progress ([2], [3]), and they
> > will be ready for review next week. What is a time of code freeze if it's
> > going to release AI 2.11 at the end of June?
> >
> > [1]
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-71%3A+Public+API+for+secondary+index+search
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14699
> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14703
> >
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 5:27 PM Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alexey,
> > >
> > > :pmc to sign distribution:
> > > Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of activities
> > > should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone else want to
> > help
> > > you here, I would.
> > >
> > > :timeline:
> > > And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> > >
> > > :scope:
> > > I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it. But if
> > > someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to be
> > > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please let
> > know.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >
> > > On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов  wrote:
> > > > Dear Ignite Community!
> > > >
> > > > I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also suggest
> > > > myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release at the
> > > end
> > > > of june 2021.
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Alexey Gidaspov
> > > >
> > >
> >

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Алексей Гидаспов]

Hi, Dmitriy!

I suggest this timeline

Scope Freeze: May 31, 2021
Code Freeze: 14 June, 2021
Voting Date: 21 June, 2021
Release Date: 28 June, 2021

пт, 14 мая 2021 г. в 11:32, Maksim Timonin :

> Hi, I'd like to include Phase 1 of index queries feature [1] to the next AI
> release. Currently there are 2 tickets in progress ([2], [3]), and they
> will be ready for review next week. What is a time of code freeze if it's
> going to release AI 2.11 at the end of June?
>
> [1]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-71%3A+Public+API+for+secondary+index+search
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14699
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14703
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 5:27 PM Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:
>
> > Hi Alexey,
> >
> > :pmc to sign distribution:
> > Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of activities
> > should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone else want to
> help
> > you here, I would.
> >
> > :timeline:
> > And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
> >
> > :scope:
> > I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it. But if
> > someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to be
> > completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please let
> know.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Dmitriy Pavlov
> >
> > On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов  wrote:
> > > Dear Ignite Community!
> > >
> > > I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also suggest
> > > myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release at the
> > end
> > > of june 2021.
> > >
> > > ___
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Alexey Gidaspov
> > >
> >
>

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Maksim Timonin]

Hi, I'd like to include Phase 1 of index queries feature [1] to the next AI
release. Currently there are 2 tickets in progress ([2], [3]), and they
will be ready for review next week. What is a time of code freeze if it's
going to release AI 2.11 at the end of June?

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-71%3A+Public+API+for+secondary+index+search
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14699
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14703

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 5:27 PM Dmitry Pavlov  wrote:

> Hi Alexey,
>
> :pmc to sign distribution:
> Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of activities
> should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone else want to help
> you here, I would.
>
> :timeline:
> And, could you estimate all phases of the release.
>
> :scope:
> I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it. But if
> someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to be
> completed before branch divergence/release candidate build, please let know.
>
> Sincerely,
> Dmitriy Pavlov
>
> On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов  wrote:
> > Dear Ignite Community!
> >
> > I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also suggest
> > myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release at the
> end
> > of june 2021.
> >
> > ___
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Alexey Gidaspov
> >
>

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

[Dmitry Pavlov]

Hi Alexey,

:pmc to sign distribution:
Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of activities 
should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone else want to help you 
here, I would.

:timeline:
And, could you estimate all phases of the release. 

:scope:
I guess we can just pick up master current state and release it. But if someone 
has some ideas if we should wait for particular feature to be completed before 
branch divergence/release candidate build, please let know.

Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov

On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов  wrote: 
> Dear Ignite Community!
> 
> I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release activities. Also suggest
> myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan release at the end
> of june 2021.
> 
> ___
> 
> Best Regards,
> Alexey Gidaspov
>