[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)

2019-06-01 Thread Andy Seaborne

The vote passes with +1 from Andy, Adam and Bruno

Thanks all,

Andy

On 28/05/2019 09:48, Andy Seaborne wrote:

Hi,

Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0.
This is the first proposed release candidate.

The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC


Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)

2019-06-01 Thread Andy Seaborne

Thanks!

On 01/06/2019 13:13, ajs6f wrote:

I was able to check the sigs, checksums, and that the source distribution 
builds and works.

Assuming that our NOTICE is up-to-date with the new contributions (it looks to 
be, but I didn't follow the discussion of the new geospatial component), I can 
vote:


Please vote to approve this release:
 [ ] +1 Approve the release
 [ ]  0 Don't care
 [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...


+1

ajs6f


On Jun 1, 2019, at 6:37 AM, Andy Seaborne  wrote:

Hi - would 2+ people from the PMC be able to check and vote please?

Andy

On 28/05/2019 09:48, Andy Seaborne wrote:

Hi,
Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0.
This is the first proposed release candidate.
The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
 Release changes:
The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki GeoSPARQL 
modules.
The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is:
https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE
 Other JIRA:
https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira
== Updates
JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086)
 Release Vote
Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
Please download and test the proposed release.
Staging repository:
   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031
Proposed dist/ area:
   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
Keys:
   https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
Git commit (browser URL):
   https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9
Git Commit Hash:
   d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd
Git Commit Tag:
   jena-3.12.0
Please vote to approve this release:
 [ ] +1 Approve the release
 [ ]  0 Don't care
 [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open until at least
 Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
and we can extend the vote period.
Thanks,
   Andy
Checking needed:
+ are the GPG signatures fine?
+ are the checksums correct?
+ is there a source archive?
+ can the source archive really be built?
   (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
   (both source and binary artifacts)?
+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
+ does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?




Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)

2019-06-01 Thread ajs6f
I was able to check the sigs, checksums, and that the source distribution 
builds and works.

Assuming that our NOTICE is up-to-date with the new contributions (it looks to 
be, but I didn't follow the discussion of the new geospatial component), I can 
vote:

>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ]  0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

+1

ajs6f

> On Jun 1, 2019, at 6:37 AM, Andy Seaborne  wrote:
> 
> Hi - would 2+ people from the PMC be able to check and vote please?
> 
>Andy
> 
> On 28/05/2019 09:48, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0.
>> This is the first proposed release candidate.
>> The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
>>  Release changes:
>> The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki GeoSPARQL 
>> modules.
>> The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is:
>> https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE
>>  Other JIRA:
>> https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira
>> == Updates
>> JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086)
>>  Release Vote
>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
>> Please download and test the proposed release.
>> Staging repository:
>>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031
>> Proposed dist/ area:
>>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
>> Keys:
>>   https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>> Git commit (browser URL):
>>   https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9
>> Git Commit Hash:
>>   d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd
>> Git Commit Tag:
>>   jena-3.12.0
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ]  0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>> This vote will be open until at least
>> Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC
>> If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
>> for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
>> and we can extend the vote period.
>> Thanks,
>>   Andy
>> Checking needed:
>> + are the GPG signatures fine?
>> + are the checksums correct?
>> + is there a source archive?
>> + can the source archive really be built?
>>   (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
>> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
>>   (both source and binary artifacts)?
>> + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>> + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
>>if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
>> + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?



Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)

2019-06-01 Thread Andy Seaborne




On 01/06/2019 13:34, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:



  [x] +1 Approve the release


Thank you!



* only minor note is the source contains pom.xml.versionsBackup, which I 
believe is not necessary, though harmless?


Yes, harmless.

I've removed them all from my release area copy of jena now and they are 
not in git. Must be left over from having to reset the version for Jena 
3.11.0 RC2.


Andy


Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)

2019-06-01 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita



 [x] +1 Approve the release


* only minor note is the source contains pom.xml.versionsBackup, which I 
believe is not necessary, though harmless?


Build from commit hash passing on


Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe; 
2018-06-18T06:33:14+12:00)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.5.4
Java version: 1.8.0_212, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: 
/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre
Default locale: en_NZ, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version: "4.15.0-50-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix"


with `mvn clean install -Pdev`.


+ are the GPG signatures fine?

Looks good to me (checked dist area)

+ are the checksums correct?

Looks good to me (checked dist area)

+ is there a source archive?

Dist area contains source. Checked a few artefacts on Maven staging. All good.

+ can the source archive really be built?
  (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)

Tested dist source, `mvn clean install -Pdev`.

+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
  (both source and binary artifacts)?

Checked a few in the source from commit hash, and from dist area.

+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?

I think so (was lurking in some recent discussion, found nothing that I could 
tell was missing)

+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
    if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?

Not sure, sorry. Missed recent conversation about licenses regarding changes in 
this release.

+ does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?

Yup!


Cheers

Bruno






On Tuesday, 28 May 2019, 8:48:41 pm NZST, Andy Seaborne  
wrote: 





Hi,

Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0.
This is the first proposed release candidate.

The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC

 Release changes:

The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki 
GeoSPARQL modules.

The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is:

https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE

Other JIRA:
https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira

== Updates

JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086)

 Release Vote

Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
Please download and test the proposed release.

Staging repository:
  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031

Proposed dist/ area:
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/

Keys:
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS

Git commit (browser URL):
  https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9

Git Commit Hash:
  d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd

Git Commit Tag:
  jena-3.12.0

Please vote to approve this release:

        [ ] +1 Approve the release
        [ ]  0 Don't care
        [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

This vote will be open until at least

    Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC

If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
and we can extend the vote period.

Thanks,

      Andy

Checking needed:

+ are the GPG signatures fine?
+ are the checksums correct?
+ is there a source archive?

+ can the source archive really be built?
          (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
          (both source and binary artifacts)?
+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
            if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
+ does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?


Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)

2019-06-01 Thread Andy Seaborne

Hi - would 2+ people from the PMC be able to check and vote please?

Andy

On 28/05/2019 09:48, Andy Seaborne wrote:

Hi,

Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0.
This is the first proposed release candidate.

The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC

 Release changes:

The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki 
GeoSPARQL modules.


The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is:

https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE 



Other JIRA:
https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira

== Updates

JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086)

 Release Vote

Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
Please download and test the proposed release.

Staging repository:
   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031

Proposed dist/ area:
   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/

Keys:
   https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS

Git commit (browser URL):
   https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9

Git Commit Hash:
   d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd

Git Commit Tag:
   jena-3.12.0

Please vote to approve this release:

     [ ] +1 Approve the release
     [ ]  0 Don't care
     [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

This vote will be open until at least

 Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC

If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
and we can extend the vote period.

Thanks,

   Andy

Checking needed:

+ are the GPG signatures fine?
+ are the checksums correct?
+ is there a source archive?

+ can the source archive really be built?
   (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
   (both source and binary artifacts)?
+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
    if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
+ does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?


Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)

2019-05-28 Thread ajs6f
No, I missed something-- I didn't see that the evaluation test question was 
unresolved, my mistake.

ajs6f

> On May 28, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Andy Seaborne  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 28/05/2019 13:00, Marco Neumann wrote:
>> median function not going to be in this release?
> 
> I see an outstanding request for evaluation tests on the PR.  Did I miss 
> something?
> 
> This release is a direct follow-on to 3.11 when we got 3.11 out close to 
> schedule leaving GeoSPARQL to follow as soon as it was ready.
> 
>Andy
> 
> 
>> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:25 AM Andy Seaborne  wrote:
>>> +1
>>> 
 Please vote to approve this release:
 
  [ ] +1 Approve the release
  [ ]  0 Don't care
  [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>> 



Re: [] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)

2019-05-28 Thread Andy Seaborne




On 28/05/2019 13:00, Marco Neumann wrote:

median function not going to be in this release?


I see an outstanding request for evaluation tests on the PR.  Did I miss 
something?


This release is a direct follow-on to 3.11 when we got 3.11 out close to 
schedule leaving GeoSPARQL to follow as soon as it was ready.


Andy




On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:25 AM Andy Seaborne  wrote:


+1


Please vote to approve this release:

  [ ] +1 Approve the release
  [ ]  0 Don't care
  [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...







Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)

2019-05-28 Thread Marco Neumann
OK sounds good, my next stats package will be released as a property
functions package I believe and not as part of ARQ. I will make changes to
the logging configuration tomorrow.

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 1:33 PM ajs6f  wrote:

> I'm afraid not. Honestly, I didn't realize that Andy was going to start
> releasing so quickly. Time flies!
>
> I've got a last request for you to stop using System.out.println to log,
> but other than that it looks like you've responded to all the comments, so
> thank you! We should be able to merge very soon.
>
> ajs6f
>
>
> > On May 28, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Marco Neumann 
> wrote:
> >
> > median function not going to be in this release?
> >
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:25 AM Andy Seaborne  wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >>> Please vote to approve this release:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >>> [ ]  0 Don't care
> >>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Marco Neumann
> > KONA
>
>

-- 


---
Marco Neumann
KONA


Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)

2019-05-28 Thread ajs6f
I'm afraid not. Honestly, I didn't realize that Andy was going to start 
releasing so quickly. Time flies!

I've got a last request for you to stop using System.out.println to log, but 
other than that it looks like you've responded to all the comments, so thank 
you! We should be able to merge very soon.

ajs6f


> On May 28, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Marco Neumann  wrote:
> 
> median function not going to be in this release?
> 
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:25 AM Andy Seaborne  wrote:
> 
>> +1
>> 
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ]  0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> ---
> Marco Neumann
> KONA



Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)

2019-05-28 Thread Marco Neumann
median function not going to be in this release?

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:25 AM Andy Seaborne  wrote:

> +1
>
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> >  [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >  [ ]  0 Don't care
> >  [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>


-- 


---
Marco Neumann
KONA


Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)

2019-05-28 Thread Andy Seaborne

+1


Please vote to approve this release:

     [ ] +1 Approve the release
     [ ]  0 Don't care
     [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...


[VOTE] Apache Jena 3.12.0 RC 1 (GeoSPARQL)

2019-05-28 Thread Andy Seaborne

Hi,

Here is a vote on a release of Apache Jena 3.12.0.
This is the first proposed release candidate.

The deadline for the vote is Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC

 Release changes:

The main feature of this release is the new GeoSPARQL and Fuseki 
GeoSPARQL modules.


The new NOTICE file for the combined binary for fuseki+geosparql is:

https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-geosparql/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE

Other JIRA:
https://s.apache.org/jena-3.12.0-jira

== Updates

JENA-1711 : Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.9 (CVE-2019-12086)

 Release Vote

Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
Please download and test the proposed release.

Staging repository:
  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1031

Proposed dist/ area:
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/

Keys:
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS

Git commit (browser URL):
  https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d4beb7d9

Git Commit Hash:
  d4beb7d99d48e98c981d434c980f83784b519ebd

Git Commit Tag:
  jena-3.12.0

Please vote to approve this release:

[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ]  0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

This vote will be open until at least

Friday, 31th May, 2019 at 20:00 UTC

If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
and we can extend the vote period.

Thanks,

  Andy

Checking needed:

+ are the GPG signatures fine?
+ are the checksums correct?
+ is there a source archive?

+ can the source archive really be built?
  (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
  (both source and binary artifacts)?
+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
   if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
+ does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?