Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha < > > ka...@harsha.io > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted > to > > > > > address > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > pluggable classes we should make a move on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini, > > > > > > > > > > > > >Can you restart the voting thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Harsha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the > > scope > > > of > > > > > > > KIP-43 > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reduced so that it can be integrated into > 0.10.0.0. > > > The > > > > > > > updated > > > > > > > > > KIP > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira < > > > > > > > > g...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Harsha, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do > you > > > > mind > > > > > > > > jumping > > > > > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the discussion thread and help me understand > the > > > > > decision > > > > > > > > > behind > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single > > > Login > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting > to > > > me, > > > > > and > > > > > > > > while > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I > remain > > > > > > doubtful. > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), > > you > > > > can > > > > > > > help > > > > > > > > me > > > > > > > > > > see > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what I am missing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha < > > > > > ka...@harsha.io > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew > Schofield < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL > > > > > > enhancements > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini > > > > Sivaram > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting > process > > > for > > > > > > > *KIP-43: > > > > > > > > > > Kafka > > > > > > > > > > > > > SASL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the > SASL > > > > > > > > implementation > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kafka to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > support > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to > be > > > > > > > integrated > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> authentication servers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> The KIP is available here for > reference: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion > on > > > the > > > > > > > mailing > > > > > > > > > > list: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> Thank you... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Grant Henke > Software Engineer | Cloudera > gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke > -- Regards, Rajini
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
jini > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the vote didn't pass yet? > > > > > > > If I can see correctly, Harsha and I are the only committers > who > > > > voted, > > > > > > so > > > > > > > we are missing a 3rd vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > > > > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. I have pinged Ismael, Harsha and Jun Rao for PR > > > review. > > > > If > > > > > > any > > > > > > > > of them has time for reviewing the PR, I will update the PR > > over > > > > the > > > > > > > > weekend. If you can suggest any other reviewers, I can ping > > them > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Gwen Shapira < > > g...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This can be discussed in the review. > > > > > > > > > If there's good test coverage, is low risk and passes > review > > > and > > > > > gets > > > > > > > > > merged before Monday morning... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We won't be doing an extra release candidate just for this > > > > though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > > > > > > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it still possible to include this in 0.10.0.0? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gwen Shapira < > > > > > g...@confluent.io> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry! Got distracted by the impending release! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 on the current revision of the KIP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha < > ka...@harsha.io > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to > > > > address > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > pluggable classes we should make a move on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini, > > > > > > > > > > > >Can you restart the voting thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Harsha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the > scope > > of > > > > > > KIP-43 > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
ail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. I have pinged Ismael, Harsha and Jun Rao for PR > > review. > > > If > > > > > any > > > > > > > of them has time for reviewing the PR, I will update the PR > over > > > the > > > > > > > weekend. If you can suggest any other reviewers, I can ping > them > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Gwen Shapira < > g...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This can be discussed in the review. > > > > > > > > If there's good test coverage, is low risk and passes review > > and > > > > gets > > > > > > > > merged before Monday morning... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We won't be doing an extra release candidate just for this > > > though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > > > > > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it still possible to include this in 0.10.0.0? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gwen Shapira < > > > > g...@confluent.io> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry! Got distracted by the impending release! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 on the current revision of the KIP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to > > > address > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > pluggable classes we should make a move on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini, > > > > > > > > > > >Can you restart the voting thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > Harsha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope > of > > > > > KIP-43 > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > > > > reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. > The > > > > > updated > > > > > > > KIP > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we continue the v
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
t; If there's good test coverage, is low risk and passes review > and > > > gets > > > > > > > merged before Monday morning... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We won't be doing an extra release candidate just for this > > though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > > > > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it still possible to include this in 0.10.0.0? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gwen Shapira < > > > g...@confluent.io> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry! Got distracted by the impending release! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 on the current revision of the KIP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to > > address > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > pluggable classes we should make a move on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini, > > > > > > > > > >Can you restart the voting thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Harsha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of > > > > KIP-43 > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > > > reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The > > > > updated > > > > > > KIP > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira < > > > > > g...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Harsha, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you > mind > > > > > jumping > > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > > > > the discussion thread and help me understand the > > decision > > > > > > behind > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, > > and > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
t; > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gwen Shapira < > > g...@confluent.io> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry! Got distracted by the impending release! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 on the current revision of the KIP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to > address > > > the > > > > > > > > > pluggable classes we should make a move on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini, > > > > > > > > >Can you restart the voting thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Harsha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > > > > > > > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of > > > KIP-43 > > > > > has > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > > reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The > > > updated > > > > > KIP > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira < > > > > g...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Harsha, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind > > > > jumping > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > > > the discussion thread and help me understand the > decision > > > > > behind > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login > and > > > > > > > > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, > and > > > > while > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain > > doubtful. > > > > > > Perhaps > > > > > > > > > > > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can > > > help > > > > me > > > > > > see > > > > > > > > > > > what I am missing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha < > ka...@harsha.io > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < > > > > > > > > > > > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL > > enhancements > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram > < > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for > > > *KIP-43: > > > > > > Kafka > > > > > > > > > SASL > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL > > > > implementation > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > Kafka to > > > > > > > > > > > >> > support > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be > > > integrated > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> authentication servers. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the > > > mailing > > > > > > list: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> Thank you... > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > -- Regards, Rajini
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
t; > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > > > > > > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of > > KIP-43 > > > > has > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The > > updated > > > > KIP > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira < > > > g...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Harsha, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind > > > jumping > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > > the discussion thread and help me understand the decision > > > > behind > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and > > > > > > > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and > > > while > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain > doubtful. > > > > > Perhaps > > > > > > > > > > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can > > help > > > me > > > > > see > > > > > > > > > > what I am missing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < > > > > > > > > > > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL > enhancements > > > > > > > > > > >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > > > > > > > > >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for > > *KIP-43: > > > > > Kafka > > > > > > > > SASL > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL > > > implementation > > > > > in > > > > > > > > Kafka to > > > > > > > > > > >> > support > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be > > integrated > > > > with > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> authentication servers. > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the > > mailing > > > > > list: > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> Thank you... > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> Regards, > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> Rajini > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Rajini > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Harsha, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind > > jumping > > > > into > > > > > > > > > the discussion thread and help me understand the decision > > > behind > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and > > > > > > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and > > while > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. > > > > Perhaps > > > > > > > > > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can > help > > me > > > > see > > > > > > > > > what I am missing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < > > > > > > > > > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > > > > > > > > >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + > > > > > > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements > > > > > > > > > >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > > > > > > > >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for > *KIP-43: > > > > Kafka > > > > > > > SASL > > > > > > > > > >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL > > implementation > > > > in > > > > > > > Kafka to > > > > > > > > > >> > support > > > > > > > > > >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be > integrated > > > with > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > >> > >> authentication servers. > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the > mailing > > > > list: > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> Thank you... > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> Regards, > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> Rajini > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Rajini >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
Gwen, Ah, I clearly don't know the rules. So it looks like it would not really be possible to get this into 0.10.0.0 after all. Rajini On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > Rajini, > > I think the vote didn't pass yet? > If I can see correctly, Harsha and I are the only committers who voted, so > we are missing a 3rd vote. > > Gwen > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Gwen, > > > > Thank you. I have pinged Ismael, Harsha and Jun Rao for PR review. If any > > of them has time for reviewing the PR, I will update the PR over the > > weekend. If you can suggest any other reviewers, I can ping them too. > > > > Many thanks. > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > This can be discussed in the review. > > > If there's good test coverage, is low risk and passes review and gets > > > merged before Monday morning... > > > > > > We won't be doing an extra release candidate just for this though. > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Gwen, > > > > > > > > Is it still possible to include this in 0.10.0.0? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sorry! Got distracted by the impending release! > > > > > > > > > > +1 on the current revision of the KIP. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to address the > > > > > > pluggable classes we should make a move on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini, > > > > > >Can you restart the voting thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Harsha > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > > > > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of KIP-43 > > has > > > > been > > > > > > > reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The updated > > KIP > > > > is > > > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira < > g...@confluent.io > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Harsha, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind > jumping > > > into > > > > > > > > the discussion thread and help me understand the decision > > behind > > > > the > > > > > > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and > > > > > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and > while > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. > > > Perhaps > > > > > > > > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help > me > > > see > > > > > > > > what I am missing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue,
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
Rajini, I think the vote didn't pass yet? If I can see correctly, Harsha and I are the only committers who voted, so we are missing a 3rd vote. Gwen On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Rajini Sivaram < rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Gwen, > > Thank you. I have pinged Ismael, Harsha and Jun Rao for PR review. If any > of them has time for reviewing the PR, I will update the PR over the > weekend. If you can suggest any other reviewers, I can ping them too. > > Many thanks. > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > This can be discussed in the review. > > If there's good test coverage, is low risk and passes review and gets > > merged before Monday morning... > > > > We won't be doing an extra release candidate just for this though. > > > > Gwen > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > Gwen, > > > > > > Is it still possible to include this in 0.10.0.0? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Sorry! Got distracted by the impending release! > > > > > > > > +1 on the current revision of the KIP. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to address the > > > > > pluggable classes we should make a move on this. > > > > > > > > > > Rajini, > > > > >Can you restart the voting thread. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Harsha > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > > > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of KIP-43 > has > > > been > > > > > > reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The updated > KIP > > > is > > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Harsha, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind jumping > > into > > > > > > > the discussion thread and help me understand the decision > behind > > > the > > > > > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and > > > > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and while > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. > > Perhaps > > > > > > > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help me > > see > > > > > > > what I am missing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < > > > > > > > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > > > > > > >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
Gwen, Thank you. I have pinged Ismael, Harsha and Jun Rao for PR review. If any of them has time for reviewing the PR, I will update the PR over the weekend. If you can suggest any other reviewers, I can ping them too. Many thanks. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > This can be discussed in the review. > If there's good test coverage, is low risk and passes review and gets > merged before Monday morning... > > We won't be doing an extra release candidate just for this though. > > Gwen > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Gwen, > > > > Is it still possible to include this in 0.10.0.0? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rajini > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > > > Sorry! Got distracted by the impending release! > > > > > > +1 on the current revision of the KIP. > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > > > > > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to address the > > > > pluggable classes we should make a move on this. > > > > > > > > Rajini, > > > >Can you restart the voting thread. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Harsha > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of KIP-43 has > > been > > > > > reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The updated KIP > > is > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Harsha, > > > > > > > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind jumping > into > > > > > > the discussion thread and help me understand the decision behind > > the > > > > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and > > > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and while > > > Rajini > > > > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. > Perhaps > > > > > > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help me > see > > > > > > what I am missing. > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < > > > > > > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > > > > > >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + > > > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements > > > > > > >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > > > > >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: > Kafka > > > > SASL > > > > > > >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation > in > > > > Kafka to > > > > > > >> > support > > > > > > >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with > > > > different > > > > > > >> > >> authentication servers. > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing > list: > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Thank you... > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Regards, > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Rajini > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Rajini > > > -- Regards, Rajini
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
This can be discussed in the review. If there's good test coverage, is low risk and passes review and gets merged before Monday morning... We won't be doing an extra release candidate just for this though. Gwen On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Rajini Sivaram < rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Gwen, > > Is it still possible to include this in 0.10.0.0? > > Thanks, > > Rajini > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > Sorry! Got distracted by the impending release! > > > > +1 on the current revision of the KIP. > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > > > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to address the > > > pluggable classes we should make a move on this. > > > > > > Rajini, > > >Can you restart the voting thread. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Harsha > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of KIP-43 has > been > > > > reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The updated KIP > is > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > . > > > > > > > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Harsha, > > > > > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind jumping into > > > > > the discussion thread and help me understand the decision behind > the > > > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and > > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and while > > Rajini > > > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. Perhaps > > > > > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help me see > > > > > what I am missing. > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < > > > > > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > > > > >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + > > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements > > > > > >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > > > >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka > > > SASL > > > > > >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in > > > Kafka to > > > > > >> > support > > > > > >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with > > > different > > > > > >> > >> authentication servers. > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> Thank you... > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> Regards, > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> Rajini > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Rajini >
RE: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
+1 (non-binding) on the revised KIP > Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:21:14 + > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements > From: rajinisiva...@googlemail.com > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > Gwen, > > Is it still possible to include this in 0.10.0.0? > > Thanks, > > Rajini > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > >> Sorry! Got distracted by the impending release! >> >> +1 on the current revision of the KIP. >> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: >> >>> Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to address the >>> pluggable classes we should make a move on this. >>> >>> Rajini, >>> Can you restart the voting thread. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Harsha >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: >>>> As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of KIP-43 has been >>>> reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The updated KIP is >>>> here: >>>> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements >>>> . >>>> >>>> Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> >>>> Rajini >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Harsha, >>>>> >>>>> Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind jumping into >>>>> the discussion thread and help me understand the decision behind the >>>>> configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and >>>>> CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and while >> Rajini >>>>> is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. Perhaps >>>>> (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help me see >>>>> what I am missing. >>>>> >>>>> Gwen >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < >>>>>>> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: ism...@juma.me.uk >>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements >>>>>>>>> To: dev@kafka.apache.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < >>>>>>>>> rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka >>> SASL >>>>>>>>>> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in >>> Kafka to >>>>>>>> support >>>>>>>>>> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with >>> different >>>>>>>>>> authentication servers. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The KIP is available here for reference: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rajini >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Rajini >>> >> > > > > -- > Regards, > > Rajini
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
Gwen, Is it still possible to include this in 0.10.0.0? Thanks, Rajini On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > Sorry! Got distracted by the impending release! > > +1 on the current revision of the KIP. > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to address the > > pluggable classes we should make a move on this. > > > > Rajini, > >Can you restart the voting thread. > > > > Thanks, > > Harsha > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of KIP-43 has been > > > reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The updated KIP is > > > here: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > . > > > > > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > > > > > Harsha, > > > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind jumping into > > > > the discussion thread and help me understand the decision behind the > > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and while > Rajini > > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. Perhaps > > > > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help me see > > > > what I am missing. > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > >> > > > > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < > > > > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > > > >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements > > > > >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > > >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka > > SASL > > > > >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in > > Kafka to > > > > >> > support > > > > >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with > > different > > > > >> > >> authentication servers. > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> Thank you... > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> Regards, > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> Rajini > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > > > > Rajini > > > -- Regards, Rajini
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
Sorry! Got distracted by the impending release! +1 on the current revision of the KIP. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to address the > pluggable classes we should make a move on this. > > Rajini, >Can you restart the voting thread. > > Thanks, > Harsha > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of KIP-43 has been > > reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The updated KIP is > > here: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > . > > > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? > > > > Thank you, > > > > Rajini > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > Harsha, > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind jumping into > > > the discussion thread and help me understand the decision behind the > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and while Rajini > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. Perhaps > > > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help me see > > > what I am missing. > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < > > > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > > >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements > > > >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > >> > > > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka > SASL > > > >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in > Kafka to > > > >> > support > > > >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with > different > > > >> > >> authentication servers. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Thank you... > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Regards, > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Rajini > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Rajini >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to address the pluggable classes we should make a move on this. Rajini, Can you restart the voting thread. Thanks, Harsha On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of KIP-43 has been > reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The updated KIP is > here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > . > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? > > Thank you, > > Rajini > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > Harsha, > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind jumping into > > the discussion thread and help me understand the decision behind the > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and while Rajini > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. Perhaps > > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help me see > > what I am missing. > > > > Gwen > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < > > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements > > >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > >> > > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka SASL > > >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in Kafka to > > >> > support > > >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with different > > >> > >> authentication servers. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > >> > >> > > >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Thank you... > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Regards, > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Rajini > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Rajini
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of KIP-43 has been reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The updated KIP is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements . Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? Thank you, Rajini On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > Harsha, > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind jumping into > the discussion thread and help me understand the decision behind the > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and while Rajini > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. Perhaps > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help me see > what I am missing. > > Gwen > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 (non-binding) > >> > > >> > ---- > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements > >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > >> > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka SASL > >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in Kafka to > >> > support > >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with different > >> > >> authentication servers. > >> > >> > >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > >> > >> > >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Thank you... > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> > >> Rajini > >> > >> > >> > > -- Regards, Rajini
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
Harsha, Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind jumping into the discussion thread and help me understand the decision behind the configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and while Rajini is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. Perhaps (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help me see what I am missing. Gwen On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: >> >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org >> > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka SASL >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in Kafka to >> > support >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with different >> > >> authentication servers. >> > >> >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: >> > >> >> > >> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements >> > >> >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: >> > >> >> > >> >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> Thank you... >> > >> >> > >> Regards, >> > >> >> > >> Rajini >> > >> >> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
+1 (binding) On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < > andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements > > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka SASL > > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in Kafka to > > support > > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with different > > >> authentication servers. > > >> > > >> The KIP is available here for reference: > > >> > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > >> > > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: > > >> > > >> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > >> > > >> > > >> Thank you... > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Rajini > > >> > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 +0000 > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka SASL > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in Kafka to > support > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with different > >> authentication servers. > >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: > >> > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >> > >> > >> Thank you... > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Rajini > >> >
RE: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
+1 (non-binding) > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 + > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka SASL >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in Kafka to support >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with different >> authentication servers. >> >> The KIP is available here for reference: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements >> >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: >> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> >> >> Thank you... >> >> Regards, >> >> Rajini >>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka SASL > enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in Kafka to support > new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with different > authentication servers. > > The KIP is available here for reference: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > Thank you... > > Regards, > > Rajini >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements
It will be good to get the SASL enhancements into 0.10.0.0 if possible. There are no outstanding questions related to the KIP and the PR is ready for review. Feedback is appreciated. Thank you... On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka SASL > enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in Kafka > to support new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with > different authentication servers. > > The KIP is available here for reference: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > Thank you... > > Regards, > > Rajini > -- Regards, Rajini
