Re: Apache Kibble 2.0

2021-02-20 Thread Kaxil Naik
Added my comments to the doc too.

Regards,
Kaxil

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:07 PM Fourat ZOUARI  wrote:

> Hi Tomek, Sharan, Added some suggests to the doc
>
> Thx, Fourat
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 1:53 PM Tomasz Urbaszek 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Sharan!
> >
> > I already prepared the project structure together with some automation
> > (pre-commits, CI, etc) on my fork:
> > https://github.com/turbaszek/kibble
> >
> > Best,
> > Tomek
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 09:57, Sharan Foga  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Tomek
> > >
> > > Great initiative! I will take a look.
> > >
> > > I am still waiting on feedback from infra regarding the repo rename so
> > will follow up on that  again today as it would be good to get started
> with
> > the new version.
> > >
> > > And yes - interesting to see popularity increasing :-)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Sharan
> > >
> > > On 2021/02/20 08:11:10, Tomasz Urbaszek  wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I drafted some proposal of Kibble 2.0 design decisions:
> > > > https://s.apache.org/kibble-2-0
> > > >
> > > > This is a google docs - I found those much easier to work with than
> > > > confluence. But once we have something that we accept I will move it
> > > > to cwiki.
> > > >
> > > > Please feel free to add all your ideas and concerns!
> > > >
> > > > I think the crucial point (not covered in doc) is to decide if we
> want
> > > > to reuse the existing Kibble database or not. In my opinion, breaking
> > > > backward compatibility may improve development speed.
> > > >
> > > > And as an interesting fact I think Kibble is getting interestingly
> > "popular":
> > > > https://imgur.com/JssRETL
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Tomek
> > > >
> >
>


Re: Apache Kibble 2.0

2021-02-20 Thread Fourat ZOUARI
Hi Tomek, Sharan, Added some suggests to the doc

Thx, Fourat


On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 1:53 PM Tomasz Urbaszek 
wrote:

> Thanks Sharan!
>
> I already prepared the project structure together with some automation
> (pre-commits, CI, etc) on my fork:
> https://github.com/turbaszek/kibble
>
> Best,
> Tomek
>
>
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 09:57, Sharan Foga  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tomek
> >
> > Great initiative! I will take a look.
> >
> > I am still waiting on feedback from infra regarding the repo rename so
> will follow up on that  again today as it would be good to get started with
> the new version.
> >
> > And yes - interesting to see popularity increasing :-)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sharan
> >
> > On 2021/02/20 08:11:10, Tomasz Urbaszek  wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I drafted some proposal of Kibble 2.0 design decisions:
> > > https://s.apache.org/kibble-2-0
> > >
> > > This is a google docs - I found those much easier to work with than
> > > confluence. But once we have something that we accept I will move it
> > > to cwiki.
> > >
> > > Please feel free to add all your ideas and concerns!
> > >
> > > I think the crucial point (not covered in doc) is to decide if we want
> > > to reuse the existing Kibble database or not. In my opinion, breaking
> > > backward compatibility may improve development speed.
> > >
> > > And as an interesting fact I think Kibble is getting interestingly
> "popular":
> > > https://imgur.com/JssRETL
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Tomek
> > >
>


Re: Apache Kibble 2.0

2021-02-20 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
Thanks Sharan!

I already prepared the project structure together with some automation
(pre-commits, CI, etc) on my fork:
https://github.com/turbaszek/kibble

Best,
Tomek


On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 09:57, Sharan Foga  wrote:
>
> Hi Tomek
>
> Great initiative! I will take a look.
>
> I am still waiting on feedback from infra regarding the repo rename so will 
> follow up on that  again today as it would be good to get started with the 
> new version.
>
> And yes - interesting to see popularity increasing :-)
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
> On 2021/02/20 08:11:10, Tomasz Urbaszek  wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I drafted some proposal of Kibble 2.0 design decisions:
> > https://s.apache.org/kibble-2-0
> >
> > This is a google docs - I found those much easier to work with than
> > confluence. But once we have something that we accept I will move it
> > to cwiki.
> >
> > Please feel free to add all your ideas and concerns!
> >
> > I think the crucial point (not covered in doc) is to decide if we want
> > to reuse the existing Kibble database or not. In my opinion, breaking
> > backward compatibility may improve development speed.
> >
> > And as an interesting fact I think Kibble is getting interestingly 
> > "popular":
> > https://imgur.com/JssRETL
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tomek
> >


Re: Apache Kibble 2.0

2021-02-20 Thread Sharan Foga
Hi Tomek

Great initiative! I will take a look.

I am still waiting on feedback from infra regarding the repo rename so will 
follow up on that  again today as it would be good to get started with the new 
version.

And yes - interesting to see popularity increasing :-)

Thanks
Sharan

On 2021/02/20 08:11:10, Tomasz Urbaszek  wrote: 
> Hi all,
> 
> I drafted some proposal of Kibble 2.0 design decisions:
> https://s.apache.org/kibble-2-0
> 
> This is a google docs - I found those much easier to work with than
> confluence. But once we have something that we accept I will move it
> to cwiki.
> 
> Please feel free to add all your ideas and concerns!
> 
> I think the crucial point (not covered in doc) is to decide if we want
> to reuse the existing Kibble database or not. In my opinion, breaking
> backward compatibility may improve development speed.
> 
> And as an interesting fact I think Kibble is getting interestingly "popular":
> https://imgur.com/JssRETL
> 
> Cheers,
> Tomek
> 


Apache Kibble 2.0

2021-02-20 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
Hi all,

I drafted some proposal of Kibble 2.0 design decisions:
https://s.apache.org/kibble-2-0

This is a google docs - I found those much easier to work with than
confluence. But once we have something that we accept I will move it
to cwiki.

Please feel free to add all your ideas and concerns!

I think the crucial point (not covered in doc) is to decide if we want
to reuse the existing Kibble database or not. In my opinion, breaking
backward compatibility may improve development speed.

And as an interesting fact I think Kibble is getting interestingly "popular":
https://imgur.com/JssRETL

Cheers,
Tomek